Another brilliant performance by Judit Polgar in a rapid game against Nigel Short.
Пікірлер: 256
@dmaster20ify8 жыл бұрын
This is the perfect voice for Chess commentating.
@RaziFakhrur7 жыл бұрын
I think it's GM Daniel King's voice
@RaziFakhrur7 жыл бұрын
Search ''PowerPlayChess'' on youtube
@kickoutdude6 жыл бұрын
I prefer Mato
@cozm08596 жыл бұрын
John Brown You clearly haven’t visited Mato Jelick and his channel. His voice is godlike when it comes to chess!
@Shogo50006 жыл бұрын
To me, this is the perfect voice for mute audio after 30 seconds
@MotoGreciaMarios6 жыл бұрын
What a nice commentary. I loved the pace, the style and the analysis.
@MrPicolina123 Жыл бұрын
The way Judit managed to deactivate Nigel’s knight, bishop and rock at the same time is just beautiful, this is exactly what alpha zero does nowadays, Polgar was a real chess star.
@broken1394 Жыл бұрын
She still is!
@mytube923696 жыл бұрын
Incredible game, Judit is just amazing!
@energeticenterprizes49747 жыл бұрын
Beautiful comeback, Judit! Poise, patience and power...the trifecta you always display. Bravo!!!
@colinjava84475 жыл бұрын
It was great comeback, but was it flawed to start with? Meaning that she only won cause of shorts mistakes? It was only a 25min game I think, she might not have played so aggressively at the start if it was a long game, but thought due to the lack of time it was worth risking a crazy opening.
@guidoheuts3 жыл бұрын
@@colinjava8447 That's what the game of chess is all about my friend, exploiting your opponent's mistakes. If no one ever made a mistake no single chess game would ever be won, and they would all end in a draw.
@colinjava84473 жыл бұрын
@@guidoheuts That's probably true, but chess hasn't been solved, we don't know if its a draw with best play, but I'm 99% sure it is as whites advantage should be too small to convert to a win. I haven't analysed the game, did short screw up from a winning position, or was polgar always ahead from the start?
@ericmol26142 жыл бұрын
There was no come back. If you understand that then you understand her preparation for Nigels usual French defense. She prepared for his game. She sacked her pieces for position. He was taking bait. He needed a come back not her. If you understand what I just said then you understand her play and positional play. Look at Josh Waitkin. He was winning a game by position then he lost a rook, then he lost a queen... his dad is upset. "You were winning Josh, why'd you do that"? Can he make a comeback?.... Come back from what? Take the rook, take the queen, who cares the game is about check mate and Josh got that. That's what Judith saw too. That's what Fisher sees. There are no weaknesses or come backs in the wake of check mate. Josh and Fisher got board of the game, that's why they left, they knew the positions. Nigel would be rated as the top blitz player in the world. He allegedly met up with Fisher online. I don't remember the exact results but Nigel got blown away by about 8 out of 10 or ten out of ten. You could dig up a recording of a game on KZbin. The other player didn't reveal his name but Nigel mentioned a date in time to the other player and within a second or 2 his opponent (most likely Fisher) responded with the name of a winning chess player from south America who Fisher may have had a match with. Fisher got board with chess opening theory. In his alleged game with Nigel, the opponent used a very irregular opening. It was original, creative and out of genius. He lost his queen, but did he make a come back? Come back from what? He was opening his position and pieces. Nigel never made a come back after taking those pieces and not playing position. Nigel played well but Judith played Nigel. Does Nigel know this yet? This defeat was a 2 edged sword because Nigel refuted women in the chess world. He arrogantly mocked them... she could have mocked him after this win, but she didn't, she didn't have to because she's better than him and this was the ultimate dagger. That game really tore him a new one as you understand the psychological build up to that match and his. He was a big balloon and she had a pin waiting to happen.
This must be the funniest chess game in history. To see Short's face as he's getting his ass whipped...and Judit's surgical dismembering... LOL
@MrSupernova1113 жыл бұрын
Love it!
@groovybuddha6674 жыл бұрын
I just love he queen of chess, she has incredible insight into the game.
@luisfernandoyepezsilva32455 жыл бұрын
Beatiful video.Thank you very much!😊👌
@debrag.c.30697 жыл бұрын
Nigel seem to underestimated Judit early in the game. Brilliantly played Judit!
@southparkninja31904 жыл бұрын
Debra G.C. If you play the french it doesn’t mean you are underestimating your opponent.
@paulepstein97392 жыл бұрын
@@southparkninja3190 Yes, you are correct. I don't see any evidence whatsoever for underestimation.
@palebluedot8733 Жыл бұрын
Yeah he totally underestimated her by playing french defense, should've gone for bongcloud defense instead.
@yellowdart66668 жыл бұрын
short is making his "BUT DAMMIT i WAS WINNING" face. :D
@bobradford26377 жыл бұрын
Nigel must be having nightmares after these losses.
@ri10q448 жыл бұрын
I love these! Keep uploading please!
@yggdrasil90397 жыл бұрын
Classic game. Great stuff.
@yanbox1233 жыл бұрын
This woman is a chess killer! Awesome! The best, simply!
@isaakvandaalen3899 Жыл бұрын
Me watching the game: "Damn Judit is getting crushed." *Three or four normal-looking moves later* Me: "Holy damn where did that attack just come from? Where are Nigel's pieces? What just happened???"
@nigelsouthworth55772 ай бұрын
Thanks for your insight!
@zebra3stripes7 жыл бұрын
In chess, as in life, the Short bishop gets no action in the end.
@myphonediaz69735 жыл бұрын
Thanks i had a good laugh at that one pretty clever :)
@DexterHaven7 жыл бұрын
This video is mis-titled. It makes it look like Polgar is playing black, when she's playing white. Very misleading. It should be Polgar vs. Short.
@andrewptob5 жыл бұрын
It's Short vs. Polgar, which is titled correctly. The subtitle is correct, too, because Nigel had a winning position and let it slip away.
@nowekant934 жыл бұрын
@@andrewptob No. Whoever plays white is mentioned first, it's as simple as that.
@andrewptob4 жыл бұрын
@@nowekant93 Yes, I was incorrect.
@talyannatal59697 жыл бұрын
This is strategic
@alexroc172 Жыл бұрын
what a lovely game!
@kingshearer27 жыл бұрын
Fantastic game
@gaspot0072 жыл бұрын
Judit Polgar is my favorite Grandmaster.
@MrUtubePete7 жыл бұрын
Nagyon szep, Judit
@gerrylast35532 жыл бұрын
4:46. the turnaround. But watch the whole game to experience the brilliancy of Judit Polgár.
@Enigmaprince8 жыл бұрын
Wow that so educational game to watch. I love how she plays calmly and simple yet effective and demolishing such a joy to watch her style compared to Mikhal Tal which is unexpected, magical and from another planet :)
@fredleoni33047 жыл бұрын
Judith is fantastic
@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar2 жыл бұрын
Would also like to commend the commentator on his intonation and accurate remarks while keeping the pace of the replay at a nice rate.
@dionlindsay25 жыл бұрын
Enormous bouquet? It couldn't have been any smaller! I think bouquet just has to go with enormous. I bet the commentator wished he hadn't said that. Either that or he's never bought flowers for anyone :-)
@irrelevance38593 жыл бұрын
This was great chess commentary
@ilmeni5413 жыл бұрын
"People who celebrated too early: Chess edition"
@hammondvoodoo95557 жыл бұрын
Cool game. After the opening I thought that this is already a winning position for black but then, to my surprise, all of a sudden white was much better. Judit - the best female chess player ever.
@russellallan84422 жыл бұрын
@9.48 the king cant go f8, because the white pawn is on e7 - where it moved to reveal the discovered check by the bishop. SHort's only move is to either block with the rook or the bishop on e6 but it only delays the inevitable. Very open game and Polgar showing why she is such a beast.
@JA-xv3qp4 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Polgár means citizen.
@paololuckyluke28543 жыл бұрын
Fun fact about another female chess master, from Georgia: Nazi Paikidze. Nazí means gentle. Paikidze means the son of a pawn.
@JA-xv3qp3 жыл бұрын
@@paololuckyluke2854 Nazi really means gentle? Wow! :D
@paololuckyluke28543 жыл бұрын
@@JA-xv3qp Yes, it’s all there in the Wiki. Of course, it’s clear why that causes some surprise, and there is a sort of parallel in the surprise one has when discovering the swastika is actually a Hinduist good luck symbol.
@afonsosousa26843 жыл бұрын
@@JA-xv3qp Could've fooled me!
@MArk-yn4sp3 жыл бұрын
Would it not be correct that the title reflects who plays white, i.e. 'Judit Polgar vs. Nigel Short - What a Turnaround'? Just asking. tks
@mplites71608 жыл бұрын
i love you judit😘
@alfredcayman94858 жыл бұрын
The key move is A-four after which white's rook comes in and her king has what looks like a normal castled position. The French often leads to a bottled up queenside.
@nicholaswideman66582 жыл бұрын
Whats that song by Paul McCartney and the wings!? King on the run! King on the RUN!
@scottywarren34986 жыл бұрын
The knight to g7 was brilliant
@jainpaigemilan42154 жыл бұрын
wow!
@maxpheby72877 жыл бұрын
After everything that was said only Nigel Short could lose this game lol.But then Polgar was a really strong player at this time.
@mizofan7 жыл бұрын
Not only Short could lose to her- 11 male world champions did, including Kasparov, Karpov, Carlsen, Anand and Kramnik
@Qhsjahajw3 жыл бұрын
@@mizofan losing is the wrong word, as wc have very one sided resukts against her
@Orion-zq8jf4 жыл бұрын
Brutal
@jedinxf72 жыл бұрын
it's crazy how disastrous the opening looked for her and how quickly she turned it into a killer attack. it almost looks like an elaborate intentional exchange sac!
@chvsanchez7 жыл бұрын
Too little real video of the players.
@paulepstein97392 жыл бұрын
"Capturing the rook in the corner also looks completely winning." With the benefit of Stockfish, we now know that this line is actually drawn with best play. The only way to prevent Polgar's attack is to draw by perpetual check. Probably Polgar (and her team) prepared all this.
@jedinxf72 жыл бұрын
she'd have had to prepare it without computers to assist... back when home analysis was legitimate work
@hungrrry Жыл бұрын
well if that was prep nobody saw that bd7 would have been crushing for black!?
@davidsinclair74392 ай бұрын
Apparently not. Polgar herself says in her autobiography, about this game, specifically: "I didn't do any special preparation for rapid games in those days, and was focusing more on having fun". Even 30 years later, watching her clobber Nigel Short (a bit of a tit by all accounts) is still fun.
@brianel-khoury8852 жыл бұрын
Absolute queen. Brilliant b3 kb1 a4 ra2 and those bishops. trashing this opening prep advantage like that over the board must feels great
@colinjava84477 жыл бұрын
Na8, lol, what a sad move.
@miguelmichel682 жыл бұрын
come back, baby come back!
@sahilhossain820411 ай бұрын
Lore of Nigel Short vs. Judit Polgar - What a Turnaround momentum 100
@taylorpeppers5012 Жыл бұрын
That was the most non enormous bouquet I've ever seen
@abdulbasit-cn9ek Жыл бұрын
4:17 hows would that develop to checkmate?
@ardweaden Жыл бұрын
What do you mean? He gives the variations.
@abdulbasit-cn9ek Жыл бұрын
@@ardweaden Ok, i see how the situation at 4:17 can turn into the victory for black. Thanks for responding anyway.
@prudvitheja1344 жыл бұрын
Intel keeping its brand image by associating itself with chess (intelligent games) - marketing
@Narrowcros7 жыл бұрын
Short had a strong advantage out of the opening, for some reason decided to play passively after that and got punished.
@sylvesteruchia52632 жыл бұрын
His problem was actually playing too aggressive. He should've tried to run his queen away and not turned it into a target. Also not castling might've saved him
@ItsAllAboutGuitar6 жыл бұрын
Why the hell would he take the rook and let her out of trouble!?!??!
@ageema2 күн бұрын
boss game!
@bigstar664 жыл бұрын
Stockfish says a5 was the blunder that sunk Short. From 2.5 to 8. So yes, Polgar was not only "actually winning" but BTFOing him.
@michaelmacdonald29072 жыл бұрын
Even when Judit plays what looks to be an ugly opening - it turns out beautiful
@colinjava84475 жыл бұрын
With the black queen down the bottom end short has too many queen moves to play, whereas polgar develops her pieces whilst pushing the black queen out of her half of the board. Should short have won it once his queen entered the bottom half of the board from an engine's perspective? Would be interesting to see the best line of play from there.
@user-ri6rs9is8d7 жыл бұрын
Mm... May be - Judit Polgar vs Nigel Short ?......
@agfd56594 жыл бұрын
You are correct
@Jesusandbible4 жыл бұрын
taking the rook ws a complete blunder
@armtwister2 ай бұрын
Commentary by GM Daniel King, i presume.
@ablejack38 жыл бұрын
The continuation is flawed. After Short resigns the threat is not e7+, it's e7 mate. There is no possible f8 after e7, of course.
@ablejack38 жыл бұрын
Oh yes, I see. Sorry, I thought you had supposed Kf8 in answer to e7. / I am aware it is black's turn at that point. No worries.
@jalajupadhyay14917 жыл бұрын
It is Black chance to move, so it can make the move Kf8. e7 is mate only if Black does not move its King.
@murniatisinaga44722 жыл бұрын
She is beauty and smart 😘
@amarjanuwithsanuandpanu43765 жыл бұрын
judit is the most beautiful chess player ever
@ardweaden5 жыл бұрын
Check out Triin Narva
@jeremybeadleslefthand4802 жыл бұрын
Come on...I wouldn't say no to Judit but have you not seen other female players? Some stunned out there!
@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 Жыл бұрын
Andrea Botez
@raginbakin1430 Жыл бұрын
who cares about their physical beauty, I care about the beauty of their intellectual ideas. They’re chess players, not models
@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 Жыл бұрын
@@raginbakin1430 Andrea Botez.
@uzard38605 жыл бұрын
Waw
@jarmokajander79907 жыл бұрын
KIITOS PALJON!!
@aandjwynn2 жыл бұрын
Judit is Boss!
@iDigaNicePony7 жыл бұрын
Nigel Short just doesn't have the brains to play chess against Judit Polgar
@queenu6062 ай бұрын
He got humiliated lmao
@liammcooper6 жыл бұрын
"Women can't play chess" - Nigel Short What a dullard.
@GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser6 жыл бұрын
Except that's not a Short quote but you earn some social justice points.
@liammcooper5 жыл бұрын
@@GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser Yeah he did. "Girls don't have the brains to play chess". He also doubled down and gave an incredibly stupid television interview. But keep deflecting for your liver-lipped idol, idgaf.
@gpbear25295 жыл бұрын
@@GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser He did say that though lol. Nigel Short fans cant even admit when they're wrong. Not surprising
@GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser5 жыл бұрын
Well if he really said "Girls don't have the brains to play chess" then I don't agree with him, that's not different from "Women can't play chess". Happy to clear that out guys.
@Ronbo7108 жыл бұрын
This was almost as funny as seeing Short in the World Championship %)
@rafaelcunha18504 жыл бұрын
9:42 wtf was that, king cant go to f8 he just checked and moved the pawn back wtf
@ardweaden4 жыл бұрын
Rafael Cunha He's just showing a different variation, so he moved the pieces back to the starting positions of the variation.
@broken1394 Жыл бұрын
Short coming up short.
@IGUIDERAbderrahman2 жыл бұрын
She puts him in the mixer hhh
@dmaster20ify3 жыл бұрын
Oh man. Judith Polgar only woman to play in the elite!
@AlonsoRules4 жыл бұрын
French bishop again is locked out
@yashpermalla34946 жыл бұрын
i love how neither queen has moved for the first 8 minutes at least
@100neshama6 жыл бұрын
Judit is one of the greatest contributions that the Jewish people have made to humanity!
@enprise73358 жыл бұрын
He didn't even shake her hand pretty bad!
@PartialObserver8 жыл бұрын
Actually he did... They showed it up close right before the stood up....
@sc70863 жыл бұрын
Short castled short and resigned shortly :D
@paulmorphy61872 ай бұрын
Obviously deep prep from Judit...
@omarshehta87895 жыл бұрын
one look form judit to me and i will resign
@shinywarm69063 жыл бұрын
This clip should be replayed every time Short comes out with his "Men are better at chess than women" schtick.
@ardweaden3 жыл бұрын
He didn't claim every man is better in chess than every woman, rather that women on average have a different skill set than men, and that men tend to be better at chess, and women tend to be better at certain other things.
@shinywarm69063 жыл бұрын
@@ardweaden yes, i know.
@abdelkarimchakhar3652 жыл бұрын
Well if you know it, why did you put that stupid comment?
@shinywarm69062 жыл бұрын
@@abdelkarimchakhar365 have another read. See the bit where Ardweaden says, "[Short] didn't claim every man is better than every woman"? I didn't say he did, either. Instead, I referred to Short's, "Men are better at chess than women schtick". Schtick = "a gimmick, comic routine, style of performance, etc. associated with a particular person." Short has been "associated with a comic performance" of sexist stereotypes regarding chess performance (and driving, amongst other things)
@ardweaden2 жыл бұрын
This clip does not prove or disprove, or expose irony, of anything Short claimed.
@mikebaker637 жыл бұрын
3.00 why Qf2 why not simply pxp and 0-0? Short's a hack
@KL-eo4vc5 жыл бұрын
Nigel short não passa de um arrogante.
@Philly_Jump_Over_The_Fence3 жыл бұрын
Good chess player. But he is an obnoxious, arrogant sh1t.
@n64danny212 жыл бұрын
After all that the dork resigned?! What a total let down, a game of chess without checkmate is always a disappointment 😔
@ardweaden2 жыл бұрын
You must be getting disappointed by top level chess all the time then.
@n64danny212 жыл бұрын
@@ardweaden the more I watch it yes lol Just a bunch of quitters.
@n64danny212 жыл бұрын
@@ardweaden so grand masters never get taken by surprise? Even if they can see they will be in checkmate soon, how can they know with 100% accuracy the opponent sees it as well? How many games could have turned around in the loosers favor had they stuck with it i wonder.
@ardweaden2 жыл бұрын
@@n64danny21 In most cases, the win is rather trivial and it's pointless to continue. Of course there are always cases where either player overlooked something trivial - you can't really speak about 100% accuracy for anything - but those are exceedingly rare.
@Alan2ring2 жыл бұрын
Really interesting game. But why is e7 pawn disappearing and going back at min 9:42? Black king couldn't have moved to f8. Only possible black move was pawn to e6, then white pawn takes, black rook takes e6 pawn, d5 bishop takes rook. It was actually mate in 4 moves, not 8. Regardless, good commentating. Shows you how back in the day commentators would actually use their brains and not Stockfish to predict moves.
@ardweaden2 жыл бұрын
He is saying that white *threatens* to play e7, but it's not white's turn. So if black skipped a move, this is what white would play. He then proceeds to show what would happen if black played Kf8 as a defence to that threat.
@Tom-dt4ic4 жыл бұрын
This is easily the most humorous chess game in history.
@jeremybeadleslefthand4802 жыл бұрын
You haven't seen GothamChess and his games where he analyses 300 ELO players then 😂
@azoriusherald7 жыл бұрын
Commentary was kind of melodramatic, wasn't it? Bh4 check "and Polgar is in DEEP trouble." "The situation is desparate." If he honestly thinks Polgar didn't see the continuation with walking her king to the queenside I think he's giving her way too little credit.
@azoriusherald7 жыл бұрын
I would almost guarantee this is prepared by Polgar.
@vuk9117 жыл бұрын
Her position was bad after Bh4, and it was simply awful after Nh4, Qh4. If that was a preparation, it was probably the worst preparation in history of chess.
@jasongoodacre6 жыл бұрын
Short simply played a bad move capturing the rook, and didn't see the continuation where white gains a tempo by threatening check/queen capture and gains another tempo by attacking with rook. The lesson here is you shouldn't bring your queen so deep into enemy territory UNLESS u are 100% sure of continuation because queen is vulnerable to attack by lesser pieces. Having 2 undeveloped pieces was suicide at this level.
@reinhardtscheepers63175 жыл бұрын
Her position was very desperate and was indeed in deep trouble as showed by the commentator’s analysis. Bd7 and Rc8 were crushing. Nigel Short just blundered his winning position away, as I’m sure we all have done at a time in our chess careers. I absolutely adore Judit’s playing style, but I don’t believe her early play in this game was prepared.
@user-zk5uo5io2m Жыл бұрын
@@azoriusherald Lol what she's completely lost in that position
@chessbrilliance8783 Жыл бұрын
g4??? What an ugly move! I can't believe Judith played that move!
@marcusw3996Ай бұрын
Judit cheated, she used beads.
@g.c.93997 жыл бұрын
these chess players are so arrogant
@99ize187 жыл бұрын
Some are and some are not, just like the rest of the human race. Don't generalise.
@michaelmcgee3353 жыл бұрын
What a dick of a thing to say.
@ALEN1ful6 жыл бұрын
Women can have the advantage because they are expected to lose so there is no pressure. No pressure can lead to a build up of confidence and demoralisation of the opposition in any sport or game. I know i played a bit of tennis and i can say the mental side is almost everything.
@freudianslippers65675 жыл бұрын
Being told you'll never measure up and underestimated your entire life, simply because of your biology, might be a little bit of pressure.
@tracetrace21474 жыл бұрын
@@freudianslippers6567 True..
@chuckkoehler95264 жыл бұрын
I wonder how distracting it is for males to play attractive females vs. females playing attractive males. Like Miss Finland playing poker against a bunch of dudes. She is stunning.
@paulepstein97392 жыл бұрын
I think Jennifer Shahade made an excellent point about this. A straight man is likely to want to impress an attractive woman, so may be motivated to try even harder. Anyway, Short didn't play particularly badly. Capturing the rook is a natural idea, but that capture leads only to equality and gives the attacking chances to White.
@raginbakin1430 Жыл бұрын
Short got whooped this match! No wonder he became misogynistic 😂
@tosgem8 жыл бұрын
would a fan give a male player a bunch of flowers? massive sexism in chess, this is why it's a man's sport
@TheDcfan018 жыл бұрын
I can't tell if the comment is for real or just trolling
@tosgem8 жыл бұрын
+TheDcfan01 trolling. thanks.
@inyourgenes8 жыл бұрын
Because men are more clever?
@JizzyMcFrizzyLOL8 жыл бұрын
Lol, you sound incredibly stupid. Where is the hard-core scientific evidence supporting your statement? Oh wait - it doesn't exist because it's not a fact. It's just the opinion of a sexist idiot.
@ChrisP8728 жыл бұрын
Nice troll. I thought you were serious too.
@garymorgan17247 жыл бұрын
One victory by a woman over a mediocre former top ten male player does not mean that women chess players are the equal of their male counterparts - which is all that Short went as far as to say anyway. So he doesn't warrant condemnation for anything he has said and women have an awfully long way to go until they prove anything other than Short's own mediocrity as a player.
@GoldenB1016 жыл бұрын
how many men play chess compared to women, how many women are encouraged to play chess etc.
@2CSST26 жыл бұрын
People have a strong tendency to do and like what they are good at, and people who are encouraged into something they don't enjoy will very likely not make a good career out of it. The reason why there are fewer women playing chess is because they are not as good at it, not the other way around.
@warrendsmith68326 жыл бұрын
Short at his peak was ranked #3 in world, hardly "mediocre." Polgar's peak was #8. But I would agree that Short was a comparatively weak player historically AMONG WORLD CHAMP CANDIDATES, which is a lot different from "a weak player." Short in his video about how women allegedly are worse at chess mentioned as one possible reason that women may be "less aggressive" but Judit Polgar is one of the most aggressive players ever, she does not have that problem :) In this particular game it would almost look like Judit planned the whole game to cause that turnaround.. and maybe she indeed did have the ultimate formation in mind... except if Short had responded right, she never would have gotten there, she would have been dead. So she was lucky this game. I think if the colors had been reversed, Polgar never would have let Short survive white's bad opening, she definitely would have gone for the throat rather than merely saying "I'll win your rook." You never want to expose your throat to Judit Polgar, she's a total killer in those situations.
@freudianslippers65675 жыл бұрын
The male fragility here is equal parts hilarious and troubling.
@704studio3 жыл бұрын
Mr Morgan, Short played Kasparov for the world title, it is true the match was a blowout, but considering only a handful of players in the history of humanity played in a world championship chess match, to call Short mediocre is a bit misleading.
@MrSupernova1116 жыл бұрын
2:40 "And now Polgar is in deep trouble." 6:08 "Polgar might actually be winning." First the commentator disregards Polgar's ability to counter attack then he changes his mind and states she might actually be winning. What an idiot.
@paulepstein97392 жыл бұрын
Ummm... No. The engines show that Polgar was in deep trouble when the commentator said she was in deep trouble, and she was winning when the commentator said she was winning. No change of mind, just a change in the game.
@abdelkarimchakhar1799 Жыл бұрын
You are the idiot, the commentator was correct, her position was loosing till Short did a couple of mistakes/blunders.
@clivewismayer24042 ай бұрын
Short is & was a crap player
@ardweaden2 ай бұрын
Yes, no.3 in the world.... Definitely a crap player.