NO WAY. The Count of Monte Cristo is one of the best books ever written and it is a classic book.
@PaulRidgeway-h7l2 ай бұрын
And Three Musketeers - Dumas is fantastic
@thomasciuffreda87832 ай бұрын
What truly makes a classic is it's longevity, how we can still find relevance to its themes in our own lives. One of the best examples is Tom sawyer. He lived is a world without telegraphs or telephones almost 200 years ago, a time hard to relate to, but you can still relate to the kid: he wants to skip school and hang with Huck Finn, the cool older kid who's also the town outcast, and they go on adventures together. Kids 200 years from now will still relate to Tom
@nosferatubr97533 ай бұрын
Ítalo Calvino wrote that a classic is a book that didn't stop saying what it has to say. That is, its content is still relevant, the world changes and even so we can read it and its still important. I'm a literature teacher and read A LOT of Fantasy and SciFi books, and for me Literature is everything that is in my library. No distinctions.
@angussinclair13443 ай бұрын
Count of Monte Cristo is arguably the greatest book OAT and that came out in 1844-1846. It holds up so so well.
@smowka2 ай бұрын
In my experience, reading The Great Gatsby, 1984, and Of Mice & Men my freshman year of high school (2009-2010) immediately changed the way I felt about reading! It was the first time I was flying through books that weren’t Harry Potter or Twilight 😅
@MorgothsBalrog3 ай бұрын
I believe that one of the reasons some people say classic books are boring is because they don't have the attention span, nor the patience to enjoy a book that takes it's time. They need nonstop action in order to enjoy books while they totally ignore the messages and themes.
@valliyarnl3 ай бұрын
agreed
@katherinep10103 ай бұрын
I think a lot of has to do with how we're introduced to them. Being required to read specific ones, often at a breakneck speed that doesn't really allow time to think about the themes and messages, at too young an age. I know I had to read roughly 40 pages a night of Great Expectations at age 13, on top of all my other homework. It was a horrible experience, and I have no idea if it's actually a good book. Imagine only having read 10-15 modern books, being told by someone else which ones and how fast you had to read them. You might then say modern books are all boring.
@JaxBespoked3 ай бұрын
@@katherinep1010 My experience exactly at age 14. I enjoyed the novel so much as a 40 year old. It was a completely different experience.
@Mermer-163 ай бұрын
@@katherinep1010 I was an avid reader from a young age, and I had a great teacher or two, so I didn't mind the assignments, lol. But I agree with you. I definitely think classics should be introduced to younger/newer readers, but I wish more care would be taken when doing so.
@codynunez52462 ай бұрын
100% Most readers today would not like Lord of the Rings.
@elisabethprice46973 ай бұрын
If you have never read the Count of Monte Cristo then you can’t say classics are boring because Count of Monte Cristo is phenomenal!!!
@CombativeRoboGuy3 ай бұрын
AND THAT IS A FACT!
@shughes57783 ай бұрын
The translation I read was quite boring, but I hope to read a good one at some point.
@noone94723 ай бұрын
I hope they read and review it 🙏
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
We will have to read it!
@CombativeRoboGuy3 ай бұрын
@@2ToRamble you absolutely do have to!
@codynunez52463 ай бұрын
The big difference between something like ACOTAR and War & Peace or Great Gatsby is entertainment. ACOTAR is a great series because it entertains and really draws the reader into the world, i.e. escapism. Classic books or great literature can be entertaining but that is not their primary draw. They deal with perennial questions and how the current age wrestles or struggles with them through characters that are unique and feel real like someone we know and are not carbon copies that can be found 10x over in other books. Raskolnikov in Crime and Punishment, Captain Ahab in Moby Dick, King Lear, Macbeth, Odysseus, Ivan Karamazov in TBK or Gatsby himself are titans of characters that are timeless and speak to the soul of the human condition. In other words you're not reading just to be entertained, it is an aspect of classic literature yes but you reading for wisdom about what it means to be human in a fallen world. Flannery O'Connor sums it up perfectly in this famous quote of hers: "I'm always irritated by people who imply that [reading] fiction is an escape from reality. It is a plunge into reality and it's very shocking to the system.”
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
This reminds me of the chat Rich and I had where we were looking at “art vs entertainment” and how some works make you reflect, while others are a ‘distraction’ and maybe there’s a whole nother video to discuss on that - thanks for the thoughts!
@GelidPrince3 ай бұрын
Hoover Dam, you should read the count of monte christo, the timeless classic revenge story that all revenge stories borrow from.
@Aaarqhev3 ай бұрын
Per Harold Bloom, if you want novelty, read the classics.
@MovedbyTruth3 ай бұрын
Loved the analysis of what constitutes a classic. I definitely think anything in the 80's, or earlier, is 'classics' territory, so that would include Lonesome Dove. I'm really liking your recent deep dives into different reading topics. Personally, many off my all-time favorite books are classics. So no, they most definitely are not outright boring, by any means. In fact, I find many of them to be better written, deeper, and have more nuance than most modern books. Of course, this is just generally speaking. That being said, there are many classics that surpass anything I've read in recent decades. Books like To Kill a Mockingbird, East of Eden, The Brothers Karamazov, Lonesome Dove, 1984, The Lord of the Rings and Shogun all sit in my personal top 10 list, and that's while 90%+ books I've read are actually modern. I have yet to read The Great Gatsby, though, so that one could end up making the list. Same goes for Les Miserables, which is supposed to be incredible.
@oliverqueen92213 ай бұрын
Im currently writing a book called 50 shades of Austin and Richard. It is about two guys who have a podcast and slowly fall in love through their love of literature. They start to engage in scandalous activities but then they break up because the Wheel of Time sucks.
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
😭
@valliyarnl3 ай бұрын
no. ... gonna watch the episode now :)
@jessbrown23303 ай бұрын
You guys' take on bird species names has me cracking up in my office lmao
@valliyarnl3 ай бұрын
1:43 ok but blood red rhododendrons in Rebecca ate
@PaulRidgeway-h7l2 ай бұрын
Heart of Darkness - Candide - Three Musketeers - Count of Monte Cristo - Dracula - Frankenstein - Tale of two cities - Crime and Punishment - Catcher in the rye - Fahrenheit 451 - Atlas Shrugged - Brave new world - Slaughterhouse 5 - Foundation - how many do you want?
@saurabhregie66753 ай бұрын
Anyone knows the name of the book they said at 27:20
@Fitz-or5jk3 ай бұрын
Piranesi??
@saurabhregie66753 ай бұрын
@@Fitz-or5jk thanks mate
@AuntieBooks3 ай бұрын
I very much enjoyed this discussion. And the Hoover Dam has a fascinating history!
@elaineirving772 ай бұрын
Hoover dam. And cup of coffee ☕️ for Rich. Here over the pond in the UK we get taught Shakespeare and Dickens which I think you can say are definitely classics. Luckily my English teacher was a bit of rebel and she actually taught us more sci-fi like Day of the Triffids. But my sons did Bill S and Charlie D. As I didn’t read many classics in school I’m trying to read at least one every year in between SFF goodness. I’ve read Emma and The Count of Monte Cristo in the last couple of years. I have the Iliad and Shogun on my Kindle for when I feel ready for them. I think Mr Sanderson may take priority at the end of the year though 😂
@Klayht3 ай бұрын
Just wanted to let you guys know that you've played a huge role in my return to reading ❤ Since I've found your channel & a few others 2 months ago I've completed 5 books (2 of which being TWOK & WOR 😅), and I'm currently halfway through Oathbringer & The Will Of The Many! Never stop doing what you're doing, the content is amazing. One question though, do either of you have any interest in reading Manga? If so, I would highly recommend Vinland Saga!
@Klayht3 ай бұрын
Also, Hoover Dam 😏
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Thanks so much, an honor that we were a part of your reading journey! (Honor isnt dead) - I know Rich has read Mangas but I havent. I dont have any interest at the moment, but if I eventually get there Ill keep this in mind thankya 🫡
@StoneColt45Ай бұрын
Lonesome Dove is incredible.
@avantgardenovelist3 ай бұрын
00:30:00 intrinsic vs. extrinsic classic?
@Talking_Story3 ай бұрын
Hoover Dam!! aSoIaF for sure gonna be a classic me thinks. Had to throw in some Shakespeare.
@Sarcasmses3 ай бұрын
To answer the title, no, they are not boring, though some can be. I've been reading Tolstoy lately, War & Peace and Sevastopol done and I'm on Anna Karenina, and I find myself reacting the the text more often than with modern books. By reacting I mean laughing, or gasping in horror, some physical reaction to what I read. He does the best job I've seen of making you like or dislike a character through their own thoughts, often with only a single line, and sometimes biting down to deep feelings that people never express, like a mother's deep, undeniable jealousy at the happiness of her own daughter's first love, or a father who knows which of his five children is his favorite, and tries not to show it to the others (but fails, and the other children can tell daddy loves them least.) There's a great scene in War & Peace during the Battle of Austerlitz where one of the main characters (for the first half), Nikolai Rostov, charges into battle and for the first time is being shot at, and his reaction is to wonder "They're shooting at me? They're shooting at me! I, who am loved by all! How can they shoot at me?" I love how Tolstoy can make a character loveably or hateable neurotic or narcissistic by showing us just one of their thoughts. Near the beginning of Anna Karenina, a character, Vronsky, sees Anna talking to her brother off in the distance, and becomes "provoked" at the thought that the are actually talking about a subject that is not himself. I feel like modern writing of often very simplified and commercialized for a large audience. This makes the writing forgettable. I'd heard Robert Greene talk about his writing process, and how he likes to use more unconventional language, both because it's better at getting his point across and it tends to age better. And he's right. Imagine if Lord of the Rings were written in modern simple English like The Way of Kings or Fourth Wing. It wouldn't be nearly as memorable or well regarded as it is. Having said all that, some classic books and authors I found insufferable. Anything by Hawthorne is a chore, I hate nate. For my hot take, I absolutely cannot stand Jane Eyre - this is a book that would never be published today. Anywhere that 25 syllables would suffice to describe something with some poetic leave, Chartlotte Bronte uses 150 syllables. Every single sentence is overwritten to the point of being as long and annoying to read as they could possibly be. Tl;dr depends on the classic book. Some of them aged well. Some feel like they are a chore that are owed your time. Edit; Oh, and HOOVER DAM. No it wasn't boring - but I did learn that a channel aimed at modern fantasy readers isn't best positioned to evaluate work about family and society in the 1950s or 1800s.
@averyforeman52083 ай бұрын
As someone who loved war and peace and was bored to death with Jane eyre. I feel so seen and validated by your comment
@jakecarlstad61923 ай бұрын
I love classic novels and I love classic movies. I think the key to enjoying them is the expectations you set prior to starting them. I like Dickens but I don't ever expect conciseness when I read him. The meandering nature is part of the appeal
@b3n8352 ай бұрын
Hoover Dam, a classic must be able to be enjoyed outside of the culture it was popular in
@Talking_Story3 ай бұрын
Oh man soooo many things I wanted to say and add to this and that is what makes a great discussion! Thanks!
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Wouldve been awesome, might have to do this topic again!
@IsraelValladares-qx2dx3 ай бұрын
Hover dam! Cabbage 🥬 Stormlight will be a classic
@HollowDomain1103 ай бұрын
Another great fireside chat with the boys. Hoover damn and whatnot.
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
🙏
@zahriaraines2 ай бұрын
Hoover Dam 🫡 Great episode!
@2ToRamble2 ай бұрын
Thank you 😁
@Kozlik0012 сағат бұрын
hey guys, I listen to you while I play games like Diablo or Halls of Torment, so yes, I listened to the whole thing and even if you tangle up sometimes, you always come back to some conclusion, so its just nice to listen to you and I sometimes have time for myself to thing, when you are too
@zodlord56693 ай бұрын
the classics weren't meant to teach a hollywood movie plot to make you feel empowered or excited, they were to hopefully talk to you about the human conditions and why we're actually crazy
@nephtis842 ай бұрын
I used to think that classics are boring, then I read The count of Montecristo... Now I think modern books are boring 😬
@2ToRamble2 ай бұрын
We’ve been recommended this a lot, looks like we’ll have to read it
@Mermer-163 ай бұрын
I think a lot of modern books are boring. Simple language, simple characters, too much action. It's like getting a bag of potato chips when you really want a full meal. Both have their place, sure. (Especially after a long day at work, do you really want to go home and delve into Paradise Lost?) But more and more, I find myself reaching for the classics, because they have more substance, and so are not boring to me.
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Fair!
@alexklozano3 ай бұрын
I just want to clarify to Austin that pipeweed is tobacco, not weed. It has no significance or influence on hippie culture. Pan MacMillan published an article stating a classic put simply is merely a book that stands the test of time. Which implies it must be a good book. To say a book is an instant classic isn't really possible. For example, if we use To Kill a Mocking Bird's instant success and compare it to Fourth Wing. Do you think Fourth Wing will be a classic in 50 years? Doubtful. I would say Dracula is a classic that is anything but boring.
@PaulRidgeway-h7l2 ай бұрын
Frodo Lives! was peak hippie culture.
@SaucySkater3 ай бұрын
Kinda upset yall didnt cover this in the video, but I think you could make a pretty good argument for the Hoover Dam being a classic
@katherinep10103 ай бұрын
Hoover dam! On books stopping being classics, absolutely that happens. Think about how many classic we have that are less than 100 years old (probably more than half the ones you guys mentioned) vs ones that are 400 or 1000 years old.
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Good point!
@bigflee35562 ай бұрын
Hoover dam. One of my favorite classics is The Grapes of Wrath, did it for a class and I believe I was the only one who enjoyed the book.
@crazyperson19502 ай бұрын
Never heard this new outro dang!!!
@qbanboi0693 ай бұрын
Another 2toRamble classic!
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
🤌
@DinoWilson3 ай бұрын
Also, yall should check out Jayber Crow by Wendell Berry. A 92 year old author in Kentucky that writes beautiful poetry and novels. All of his books relate and reflect his life and his setting he lives in: farming! Jayber is the barber in a small town and the only reason he got the job was because the last one died. I truly think yall or Richard would like it. (Not fantasy) also I don’t know if I sold it but check out Goodreads lol
@supermayo8a3 ай бұрын
The DYNAMIC DUO is back with another upload that boutta be a MEGA HIT
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
😮💨😮💨
@carsonknighten68042 ай бұрын
Good points Hoover damn 🎩
@OriNebula3 ай бұрын
Study of birds is ornithology. A lot of the names are just description turned into name. A woodpecker with a red head is called a red headed woodpecker. Even woodpecker is a bird that pecks at wood to find insects. I love bird names but some of the are… over the top :)
@OriNebula3 ай бұрын
And yes I made it to the end. Hoover dam.
@KonniBel3 ай бұрын
My last book I read was the Great Gatsby and really had no clue what was going on, I felt like I read page after page without remembering what was going on....Except for the last 30 pages.. Read a few classics tho, Enjoyed the Island of DR Moreau, Jane Austins books (not all of them tho), Dracula, Frankenstein (thought that would be way more entertaining), The picture of Dorian Gray (enjoyed that one), 20.000 leagues under the sea...(One of the books that you need to read with dictionary but for a reason)... Personally whats more interesting for me is the reason why people call each book a classic. I like to read about Jules Verne and why some of his books are hard to read, why did they wanted to ban The picture of Dorian Gray, How did Jane Austin live? etc....
@KonniBel3 ай бұрын
And yeah this episode was fine, did not make me want to go work in the mines of Mars or jump from the Hoover Dam
@mscorianne3 ай бұрын
Never been so early, looking forward to listening to this at work today 😊!
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Hope you enjoyed 😁
@jakecarlstad61923 ай бұрын
Chilling out at the hoover dam. I haven't read Londsome Dove but I did just finish The Last Picture Show. He has such a way of portraying such realized characters. There was also a lot of weird sex stuff but lets just look past that for now haha.
@esmayrosalyne3 ай бұрын
The way Rich described feeling when watching that movie (struggling while watching and only being able to fully appreciate it in hindsight) is how I most often feel when reading classics tbh. I have no shame in admitting that I read more for enjoyment than any intellectual purposes, so sometimes the higher effort required to read classics just frustrates me. Or maybe I am a bit of a lazy reader, also totally possible lol. Also, I kinda agree with Rich that ASOIAF won't be a classic over time, at least not outside of the fantasy genre. I actually think it is harder for full-on secondary world fantasy books to gain that classic status because they often don't interact with a certain cultural zeitgeist like literary fiction does, you know? In any case, IF classics are boring then you guys did an exceptional job of making a chat about them fun, so kudos to you 🤣
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Appreciate it 😁. And true - LOTR being a classic was able to hit the cultural zeitgeist, we’ll see with time if ASOIAF does the same
@CodyWhitlock3 ай бұрын
Hoover damn. If you know, you know 🤷♂️
@Ranked_Journey2 ай бұрын
I grew up listening to classic books, and I have to say, I personally prefer contemporary fiction nowadays. Not to say old stories can't be interesting, but I also couldn't finish the Brother's Grim collected works, nor have I really wanted to read any classic for the last like ten years (unless you count aSoIaF as a classic). A part of it is that old books seem to have worse narration across the board compared to titles that have been released more recently. Let's see, I have listened to the Jungle Book, Tolken's collected work (including Sirmarilion), a lot of fairy tales (including about half of the brother's grim unabridged collection), the Chronicles of Narina, Peter Pan in Red, the Little Prince, the Original Shannara Trilogy, Beowulf and Dracula. Of those I only really relistened since becoming an adult is the Brother's Grim's Fariy tales as I had only heard some of the stories, and not unabridged. Still I do enjoy summaries, condensed versions of classic stories. Like the Iliad, the Odyssey, and Sun Wukong (Journey to the West). Mostly the summaries made by Overly Sarcastic Production's Red. I also enjoy contemporary book series that draw on mythology, and old legends/myths. Like Rick Riordan's Percy Jackson, and the Egyptian and Norse inspired series of his which I think I enjoyed more. I also occasionally hunt down fairy tales for inspiration. There's a ttRPG called City of Mist which let you make any character you want, and encourages you to base your character on a story. Either a fairy tale, myth, or urban legend among others.
@OmnivorousReader3 ай бұрын
SO glad I studied science, most of the lecturers loved their subjects, if not the annoying students. I will never forget PJ, the lecturer who reinacted India 'racing up the Indian ocean and SLAMING into Asia at a rate of 2cm a year' (or whatever, 2mm a year...) Many of the older classics are not for everyone, but some of them are really amazing, better than you would believe if you can approach them right. Coleen Hoover, Like Georgette Heyer and Jilly Cooper before her, will not survive.
@Ranked_Journey2 ай бұрын
I am not sure I would consider the Hoover Dam a classic.
@patrickspencer50333 ай бұрын
need to see the lonesome dove review
@happycroissant23 ай бұрын
Did I miss when Austin and Richard talked about This is How You Lose the Time War?? Or is it upcoming? Loved the vid guys ❤
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
We have a review on it! Episode #103
@manuelestrella23583 ай бұрын
Love all your vids have currently binged several and have started reading again thanks to you guys.... as well as Carl and donut hahahaha also Hola from Mexico
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Hola! And welcome to the channel, Crawler!
@manuelestrella23583 ай бұрын
@@2ToRamble DAMN jajajaja happy to be here
@manuelestrella23583 ай бұрын
@@2ToRamblealso hoverdamn
@yenneferalvarez71223 ай бұрын
This video and lonesome dove saved my marriage!!
@BookishGecko3 ай бұрын
Some of my favourite books were written in the 1800s so no I don’t think classics are inherently boring. I hated Gatsby so much when I read it for the first time last year, maybe if I’d have studied it in school I’d have loved it but who knows. I’m also an advocate for keeping Shakespeare in schools, love me some Shakespeare! I hope one day kids doing English lit degrees will study The Way of Kings because I truly believe that has the potential for amazing analysis. Hoover dam
@cannibalisticwolf33193 ай бұрын
Hoover dam's a true classic
@jakespacer3 ай бұрын
Damn the hoover... close enough
@MrBigmorg30003 ай бұрын
The idea of a classic is hard for me. I know LOTR is an all time classic, but when I started to read Fellowship, I was very bored and taken back by the prose. I’m used to Brando Sando, John Gwynne, M.L. Wang, Abercrombie, etc. Such a drastic change in style that it is hard for me to get into. Yet, I feel like I need to push myself through it, because of how significant it is. I had the same problem when I tried reading Peter Pan.
@katherinebare82122 ай бұрын
That's understandable. I read many old books at a young age ( my dad read us LOTR when I was 8), so I don't have any trouble with it, but if I consciously consider it I do have different expectations about the writing style, vocabulary, culture, tropes etc that I bring to older books that I don't have for newer ones. It's like code switching. However, if you expose yourself to those kinds of books enough you will eventually get the hang of it. Makes me think of when I watched anime for the first time! There are so many weird visual shorthands, stock characters and tropes, and aspects of Japanese culture that show up in anime that were virtually incomprehensible to me at first- now I barely notice them, lol!
@PaulRidgeway-h7l2 ай бұрын
The Hobbit and LotR can be read in a handful of hours. Not like they’re challenging reads.
@heinricholivier26553 ай бұрын
Hoover Dam and Cabbage!!
@XavierCorrea-mm6my3 ай бұрын
I can’t believe you basters made it! Been here since day one. Love you guys ❤
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
❤️
@akhiltrc97082 ай бұрын
I think Malazan could earn that status if it got the incidental type of boost that LotR got. Soldiers reading. Politicians vouching for it. Being a household name. I know it makes me sound like a Malazan slopper, but hear me out. I'm coming at it from the type of philosophical writing and expressive style Malazan is. It's a Post-modern view of looking at fantasy, and I think we as a civilization moving into the post-post modern world, this will be appreciated and thought about.
@2ToRamble2 ай бұрын
We havent read enough of this to know - but hey, could be the case
@dreammaster2.0593 ай бұрын
The Rambley Boys are at it again 😉
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
🥂
@Ranked_Journey2 ай бұрын
I read Battle Royal in School.
@futurist9993 ай бұрын
Hover dam! I think classics are ultimately desided by what is studied in schools. Many classics would not be read today, if they weren’t taught in class. And I think the books that should be taught are those, which are hard to understand or which people are unlikely to read/finish on their own. Harry Potter is easy to read, easy to understand, you don’t need to study it at school extensively, students can do it on their own. Shakespear though? Or something more obscure, long and kinda boring novels from 18th century? I think that makes for a good classroom book, but only if a teacher is able to explain and provide guidence to the students. I’m from russia, and here War and Peace is studied in school, and I think that’s great. How it is taught is not always great, but it is a great fit - little to no modern audience would be willing to read 1400 page historical fiction about napoleonic wars, which has a lot of thematic depth that you get on your own only on third read-through. Classics is something that you need to study to understand how good it is. Because at some point, I believe, its difficult yo make something more complex and brilliant without loosing some audience. And also another purpose of these complex, classical books is in some way to be an instruction manual to popular authors. “This is how you make a book.” I can’t back it up, but I would bet that the best popular authors take a lot of inspiration from classical works.
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Interesting definition, can see what you mean by that. Would you say some comedy films/less ‘studyable’ works can still be classics? Things that wouldn’t need in-depth interpretation?
@ashleyholbird42873 ай бұрын
The importance of being earnest is the single worst thing ive ever read LOL
@overtone552 ай бұрын
39:30 the people naming birds must have been sexually frustrated, sitting in the trees for 190 straight hours trying to discover a new bird
@2ToRamble2 ай бұрын
Lol
@nenyeo60903 ай бұрын
Not sure why people are saying Hoover Dam as I haven’t watched the video yet but Hoover Dam😂 also, not all classics for sure are boring. Some are super entertaining but I think we as readers judge too harshly at times with the boredom comments. Sometimes, when you’re use to a contemporary style, reading a classic that’s a different writing style and what not can def be weird. I think there’s a bit of value in boredom for what it’s worth.
@alseid87093 ай бұрын
Well, Raimi's Spider-Man was gonna catch a helicopter by putting a web between the Twin Towers, then the thing happened and they had to remove it. Also the X-Files spinoff Lone Gunmen had an episode where the government faked a plane crash into the twin towers a year before the thing happened.
@thomaswrites3 ай бұрын
"Let us see why were the curtains blue. It represented his deep inner sadness. And that's why the author k*lled themselves..." 🤣🤣🤣
@andrewbidwell64213 ай бұрын
2001 was billed to me as Alien, but machine vs man. That was like 10 minutes of the movie 🙄
@judahwagner24883 ай бұрын
The Hoover Dam is in no way boring whatsoever. On par in fact with cabbages I dare say.
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Two references? I feel like we are now indebted to you
@nazimelmardi3 ай бұрын
Bro, Hunger Games… Parable of the Sower and its sequel literally started a religion. It’s already studied at universities for a serious reason with all Octavia Butler books. So let’s just drop Hunger Games. Discworld also is rewarded for its impact in English literature not Harry Potter… by the Queen of UK (RIP). So let’s think a bit outside our preferences and hype lists or such. Think about how schools work. Why they choose a book. Especially outside USA because it’s not really the source where we decide what’s a classic alone.
@theirishman77923 ай бұрын
I agree. Song of Ice and Fire can’t be a classic cause it’ll always be an unfinished series. Edit-Hoover Dam
@Maximus06233 ай бұрын
A Song of Ice and Fire is my favorite series, but I agree it won’t be a classic that is highly read by future generations. Two reasons: 1) The next generation will grow up having heard for years how bad the end of the TV show was 2) The series will never be finished Both of those things will make kids born today very hesitant to start reading ASOIAF 20+ years from now. It won’t be generational not because the story won’t hold up, but because people won’t even be trying it
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Fair enough!
@chroby3 ай бұрын
Well I'll be hoover dam that was good
@fidato_2 ай бұрын
I hate classics. Tried many but was never able to get into them.
@Sora13plАй бұрын
Hoover Dam 👌
@cashboulder3 ай бұрын
Count of monte cristo book club when?
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
👀👀
@LucasEGC3 ай бұрын
I know it's not the point of the video, but there must be some classics that are considered as such for the wrong reasons. When Richard said, 'it's a classic for a reason,' I thought, 'but is it for the right reason?' I'm a Visual Arts teacher, and everyone can recognize that the 'Mona Lisa' is a classic in art for the wrong reasons: it's just an average painting for the time it was painted, and the story around it is what made it famous, not that it's perfect or even superior to other paintings. So, I think classic books are classics for a reason, but are they for the right reasons? If a book teaches children the values of being a good American citizen and then is analyzed in schools as a masterpiece, is it a classic for the right reason? Just asking myself. Great video as always!
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Fantastic questions!
@andrewmotley168110 күн бұрын
Hoover damn 🦫
@ElvishLibrary3 ай бұрын
Hoover Dam 🫡
@randinqual33 ай бұрын
Hoover Dam 😁
@dylanmanlyfitness2 ай бұрын
Hoover Damn
@KALtheHighstorm1173 ай бұрын
I think Classic novels are fantastic windows into their time periods, but that's not to say that they can't have relevence today, or they can't be enjoyable today. To Kill A Mockingbird is a classic, but it's an absolutely amazing novel, both to study and for enjoyment. It does the coming of age trope better than 99% of everything else. Then you have something like 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea which is one of the most boring things I've ever read lol. Read it twice, and I hated it both times. I'm sure it has value, but man I don't get it. I was also wondering if you could do me a solid. I'm not sure how much you watch of Talking Story, but they have a debate over something called The Tingle, which John says you receive when subscribing and watching. His sin Jakob says that it's not real. Jakob once said that he wants a peer-reviewed analysis on it. So, I'm going around asking their peers, other BookTubers, two things, and I will ask you the same: 1. Is the Tingle real? 2. If yes, could you let me know so that I can use your authority to help sway Jakob? P.S. I'm planning to join your Patreon later in the year. Probably sometime in November and December. I'm pretty sure Wera has said that she's going to show up as soon as I join lol
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
I dont know if I can comment on a matter so serious. The tingle isnt something that can be disected in a small KZbin comment. I will plead the fifth out of fear
@KALtheHighstorm1172 ай бұрын
@@2ToRamble That's not helpful, Austin lol. Ask Richard, he's decisive.
@naturalfluency23153 ай бұрын
Haven’t watched this yet but my answer would be no haha
@MrRosebeing3 ай бұрын
Not all of them, no. The same with contemporary books, some are good, some are awful.
@agermer1450Ай бұрын
Hoover dam 😃
@kingdonsobek3 ай бұрын
Hoover dam
@emosongsandreadalongs3 ай бұрын
My Cousin Mussolini, talk about a classic!
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Absolute classic
@PistachioGold2 ай бұрын
I try to read a lot of classics, even if I find some of them boring. I've got a good attention span and like slow moving literature. Its usually the main characters. I was rooting for the whale in Moby Dick (not the mc, I am aware), and I loved Monte Christo. Some modern classics (the penguin modern classics edition are so satisfying) are the same 😂 if I dont vibe with the characters, it can be modern or as old as The Odyssey - I'll simply find it boring (loved the Illiad tho). Also I know you guys joke about the US centric view, but Japanese classics are great ❤ I especially love the era when literature became a thing for the general population (11th century) or around 1600s - there was a lot of jokey material, much like Shakespeare. (I've studied Japanese in uni and literature was my favourite ❤ anyway Hooverdam. I didnt see the way of kings ep, so idk about the cabbages 😂😂)
@2ToRamble2 ай бұрын
😁😂
@emosongsandreadalongs3 ай бұрын
Hoover Dam
@kingdonsobek3 ай бұрын
Old things always = bad
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Richard would love this declarative statement 🤌
@uvmedia25503 ай бұрын
I will never forgive Austin for Wheel of time..
@MorgothsBalrog3 ай бұрын
Same.😂
@2ToRamble3 ай бұрын
Everyones a villain until they live long enough to be a hero…or something like that
@makarivannikov10682 ай бұрын
Do you think that Lions of Al-Rassan will become a classic? Because for me it reads like Russian classics.
@2ToRamble2 ай бұрын
Honestly can see it being a classic - it’s incredible
@timestrider96193 ай бұрын
Democracy is cringe is classic 🫵
@matteorosafio45662 ай бұрын
I disagree with the notion that books/movies produced at their time are understood and well received by people of their time. 2001 and Moby Dick were both poorly received on release and only appreciated later. Quite a few classics are ahead of their time. They are of closer quality to what is released today (as far as you can objectify the insight and enjoyment you can get from any sort of art)
@matteorosafio45662 ай бұрын
Good video enjoyed it
@2ToRamble2 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@LBrimz3 ай бұрын
HOOVER DAMN!
@Robda5ft_2 ай бұрын
lol so does this make percy jackson a classic I heard it’s being taught in schools 😂
@2ToRamble2 ай бұрын
As a Percy Jackson fan, I (Austin) fully accept this lol