Are Metaframeworks Like NextJS The Future Of React & co?

[@binaryfire]

There's a large community that uses dedicated backend frameworks (eg. Go, Laravel, Python) with SPA frontends. That won't be changing any time soon - these backend languages are waaaay more powerful than JS meta frameworks on the server side. I think your point makes sense for JS-only developers and certain kinds of apps. But there are plenty of apps that require the horsepower of a proper backend framework combined with the UX of an admin SPA.

[@maximilian-schwarzmueller]

Absolutely!

[@hundop4826]

Happy to see you making more videos. I've taken your classes for some time.

[@mohammadz5474]

Thank you Max for sharing your great advices , I needed this video , I really enjoy your videos and learn a lot from them

[@ScottSchwartz-Owen]

Max, love your explanations so much! Bravo!

[@waynecheah]

Latest developer survey clearly see all meta framework going down trend except Astro

[@sudhansusatyam5835]

The metaframework is fine when we have javascript or nodejs as backend but what if we have other choice like java,go,python or php?

[@techniquejoseph]

Thanks Max, for a thoughtful take on a complex topic.

[@mihaidornescu5014]

I am curious if in the future you will also offer a php course, maybe even Laravel?

[@zaabimahdi]

Next.js is good for static websites (e-commerce, marketing website) ... For web apps, where a lot of javascript is involved, still pure react the best option.

[@rezapaledream8426]

Hello Max i just bought your next js toturial, but i dont know what should i do after app router part that you added recently. Should i skip page router and continue? Because i want use app router in my applications Or i need page router? Since you are using that for the rest of toturial. I am confused, would you please help me with that. I apprituate your consideration.

[@THEROOT1111]

As always, very well said.

[@hamzaswed]

Thank you for sharing such valuable advices, keep up the fantastic work ✨✨

[@hichembouallegue]

Can Next.js handle very large real-world applications as a full stack? 🤔 I have reservations; it might be more suitable for frontend work, considering my current preference for a distributed backend approach using Nest.js.

[@maskman4821]

Great talk ❤

[@benjamincederholm4489]

Do you think this movement is challanging .NET Core as backend/api framework? Today a very common enterprise applications setup is to have react or angular as SPA served by .NET Core in the backend.

[@o_glethorpe]

Nextjs is only good if you are not the one paying the bills.

[@misterfister3569]

So hard to listen to his speech...

[@UwU-dx5hu]

Why tho

[@ozgurNY]

I disagree

[@maximilian-schwarzmueller]

Would love to hear more details

[@ozgurNY]

@@maximilian-schwarzmueller I respectfully disagree with your perspective on Next.js, Remix, and similar frameworks as the future of web development. Allow me to illustrate my viewpoint with a concise example: Suppose my website attracts 100 daily visitors. These frameworks offer server-side rendering and SEO capabilities, but relying on platforms like Vercel can lead to significant monthly expenses, perhaps around $100. While this might be feasible for smaller websites, what happens when the traffic scales to 1,000 or even 1,000,000 clients per day? Would it be more efficient to render the website on the client's device rather than on Vercel's servers? While the former option is cost-free, the latter could accrue substantial expenses over time.

[@xxXAsuraXxx]

I have a feeling that JQuery might be returning as a King of web development