Are perpetual motion machines possible?

Рет қаралды 6,354,168

Күн бұрын

A wheel that spins forever; a bird that never quenches its thirst; a clock that never stops ticking, an endless source of free energy. These are but the dreams of inventors striving to make perpetual motion machines, machines that can work forever without any energy input. Are these machines possible without violating the laws of physics? No.
How to shrink a quarter with electricity!
• How to Shrink a Quarte...
5 SCARY Physics Experiments!
• 5 SCARY Physics Experi...
‪physicsgirl.org/
‪ / thephysisgirl
‪ / thephysicsgirl
‪ / thephysicsgirl
Help us translate our videos! www.youtube.com...
Unbalanced wheel designed, laser cut and assembled by engineer Kyle Kitzmiller - kylekitzmiller.com
Writer: Sophia Chen
Editors: Jabril Ashe and Dianna Cowern
Host: Dianna Cowern
Weather footage: NASA Goddard
Zimara’s Windmill drawing: Burton Lee Potterveld
Cox’s Timepiece drawing - Mr. Cox’s Perpetual Motion, a Prize in the Museum Lottery, single sheet, 225mm. x 174mm., full-page engraving with letterpress on verso, London, 1774. (Ex) Item 4848706
Music: APM and KZbin
Perpetual Motion Machines
Impossible Machines

Пікірлер: 10 000

@davej3781 4 жыл бұрын

Are perpetual motion machines possible? No. Do I know why? Yes. Do I still want Physics Girl to explain it to me? YES

@jeremysmith8035 3 жыл бұрын

The First Law of thermodynamics encompasses several principles: The Conservation of energy, which says that energy can be neither created nor destroyed, but can only change form. A particular consequence of this is that the total energy of an isolated system does not change. The concept of internal energy and its relationship to temperature. If a system has a definite temperature, then its total energy has three distinguishable components, termed kinetic energy (energy due to the motion of the system as a whole), potential energy (energy resulting from an externally imposed force field), and internal energy. The establishment of the concept of internal energy distinguishes the first law of thermodynamics from the more general law of conservation of energy. Work is a process of transferring energy to or from a system in ways that can be described by macroscopic mechanical forces acting between the system and its surroundings. The work done by the system can come from its overall kinetic energy, from its overall potential energy, or from its internal energy. For example, when a machine (not a part of the system) lifts a system upwards, some energy is transferred from the machine to the system. The system's energy increases as work is done on the system and in this particular case, the energy increase of the system is manifested as an increase in the system's gravitational potential energy. Work added to the system increases the potential energy of the system: When matter is transferred into a system, that masses' associated internal energy and potential energy are transferred with it. The flow of heat is a form of energy transfer. Heating is the natural process of moving energy to or from a system other than by work or the transfer of matter. In a diathermal system, the internal energy can only be changed by the transfer of energy as heat: Combining these principles leads to one traditional statement of the first law of thermodynamics: it is not possible to construct a machine which will perpetually output work without an equal amount of energy input to that machine. Or more briefly, a perpetual motion machine of the first kind is impossible.

@marcisgulbis9310 3 жыл бұрын

@@jeremysmith8035 laws of thermodynamics applies only to steam engines and internal combustion engines, but do not apply to asymmetric electrodynamic machines and self accelerating generators. Energy is created in every electric generator. In conventional electric generator, created energy is used to do negative work and decelerate rotor. In RegenX generator, created energy is used to do positive work and accelerate rotor. Physics community get everything wrong, when they falsely applied Newtonian mechanics to electrodynamics. In electrodynamics, equal and opposite reaction can be delayed in time domain. If armature reaction is sufficiently delayed in time domain, equal reaction is no longer opposite, but complementary. Law of conservation of energy is violated along with Lenz law. Current can be delayed in time domain above critical minimum frequency, around 1kHz.

@MrMCKlebeband 3 жыл бұрын

@@marcisgulbis9310 none of this matters as long as there is no working prototype of a machine that gives you more WATTS then it took. you can make that rotor spin as fast as you want but you'll have get the energy from the rotor at some point and that is where this BS falls apart every single time.

@marcisgulbis9310 3 жыл бұрын

@@MrMCKlebebandkzbin.info/www/bejne/rnKplGeCbZKWhNE May 13th, 2021 EV Regenerative Acceleration E-BIKE VIDEO DETAILS: Driving Time Duration = 9 minutes. Ebike Speed = 27 km/hr EV "distance travelled" = approximately 4.05 km. INITIAL EV battery voltage = 73.2 Volts FINAL EV battery voltage = 72.9 Volts Battery Voltage Consumption = 4 mV Ebike Recharge Rate = 99.6%

@claytonrealist8868 3 жыл бұрын

@@jeremysmith8035 Copy and paste much? Wikipedia is your friend.

@donasgard3616 4 жыл бұрын

PERPETUAL MOTION : i am going to make infinite amount of engergy. FRICTION : I am going to end this man's whole career

@infernosm3857 4 жыл бұрын

Nice one

@GodSpeaksInMath 4 жыл бұрын

Is the sun a perpetual source of energy if it keeps generating plasma for the next "5 billion" years? If I make a solar plane that continuously circles the earth solely on converting solar radiation to electricity and it flies for the next 50 years would that be considered perpetual motion? Are planets steadily circling their suns perpetual motion. Is a magnet considered a perpetual source of magnetism if its magnetic flux flows for at least 3 human lifetimes? Would a fully functioning solar thermal plant which stores excess heat from the sun in molten salt for nightime consumption be considered a perpetual source of electricity once material and building costs are recouped? The fact that the earth rotates every single day, always has and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future, isnt that a perfect example of perpetual motion? Most of the scientific community are information regurgitators and dont seem to live on earth... or even in this solar system. Was/Is Brian DePalmas N machine a thing? What did the University of Texas recreate in the early 90s under grant from the US Air force ? Was/Is Stanley Meyers Water engine a thing? What info was really in all those confiscated then classified Tesla papers? Social Acceptance is not virtue. Ignorance is not bliss... In fact, it has been very costly and damaging to our climate and our collective futures.

@fleksimir 4 жыл бұрын

@@GodSpeaksInMath I know you're a troll (or at least I hope so) but I'll still explain what is the problem here for your first question in case someone interested stumbles upon your comment but doesn't know why you're mostly speaking nonsense. There is more than 1 type of perpetual motion machine definitions, but let's keep it simple here: The ability of giving energy for a long time doesn't make Sun a perpetual source of energy. It would be if it was creating energy out of nothing, at no cost whatsoever, which it is not. The energy comes from fusion in it's core, which is "spending" it's mass. It will not work forever. Just because some huge number of years seems like forever to you doesn't actually make it forever, on top of which even if it was forever, it still would need not to "spend" it's mass or use any other source of energy whatsoever while radiating energy out in order to be a perpetual source of energy. This is not easy to understand without proper education in those fields (although not impossible) and while it is good to ask questions to try to understand, it is very bad to spread misinformation to others just because you yourself cannot comprehend it (and if you don't get it, then it must be a lie, right?). I did not go further than first question because; to someone thinking objectively, explaining one of your silly ideas will be enough to see what's going on here, where on the other hand to someone wanting your ideas to be true; I could be talking for days and it would not have any effect (nor do I poses the knowledge to properly evaluate all of your questions). I will not reply to you or any other trolling attempts again because I don't converse with trolls, this message was for everyone else that might read this. Apologies to any physicists that might be reading this, my terminology is bad, physics isn't my main field.

@GodSpeaksInMath 4 жыл бұрын

@@fleksimir You're what i like to call an information regurgitator. If you had critical thinking ability what i said would have been self-explanatory. Im actually a professional engineer consulting with many forbes 50 companies since my mid 20s. Ive actually invented things and written multiple patents. I actually know that science is the study of nature( universal nature is perpetual) and that math is the universal language. Im not a troll. I discovered WHY Saturn has a Hexagon before NASA and every astrophysicist out there...check out the vid on my channel. What have you done other than read, memorize and repeat.?

@GodSpeaksInMath 4 жыл бұрын

@@fleksimir btw Mr Regurgitator...The sun generates electrical plasma from a concentrated magnetic "primer field" at the center of every solar system...Its not nuclear fission or fusion.. which would have run out after a couple hundred years at most....and 6 billion years to a human being is "forever". Think about it.

@joenodden 8 жыл бұрын

I saw a toy called the asteroid pendulum a "perpetual motion machine" but then came to a quick conclusion that it wasnt real because there was a battery pack on the bottom...

@timetogetcancer7866 8 жыл бұрын

+Ethan Ho haha ur last name is Ho. Lol. Wait so is mine... Oh well hi

@ultimate7544 8 жыл бұрын

+Time To Get Cancer XD

@alydeamz1292 8 жыл бұрын

lol

@trixelpixel5196 8 жыл бұрын

joe nodden same

@lswiler 8 жыл бұрын

Well I have 8yrs running 2 solar lights in the yard. A rechargeable battery, LED light and tiny solar panel that charges the battery. I have not replaced anything on it in 8yrs. So the initial $14 has paid for itself. I only Windexed the little solar panel once. Free basically.

@josea.9429 4 жыл бұрын

"Lisa, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" - Homer Simpson.

@marianskodowski8337 3 жыл бұрын

yes... the modern slaves do

@marcisgulbis9310 3 жыл бұрын

@@marianskodowski8337 Energy is created in every electric generator. In conventional electrical generator, created energy is used to do negative work and decelerate rotor. In ReGenX generator, created energy is used to do positive work and accelerate rotor. Current is delayed in time domain, and start to flow, when magnet has already passed top dead center of the coil. There is 20 magnets on rotor. When rotor rotates with 3600 rpms, frequency is 1200 Hz . Regenerative acceleration effect occurs above critical minimum frequency. www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/reidentifying-or-universe-as-an-infinite-system-rather-than-a-closed-system www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/history-of-pdi-innovations-2005-2020 www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/final-version-electric-vehicle-regenerative-acceleration-innovation-presentation-for-international-ev-oems 1 ReGenX coil can provide 1000 W of electrical power without mechanical power input. 10 ReGenX coils can power electric car forever. 100 ReGenX coils can power Tesla Semi truck forever. www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/final-2018-report-for-siemens-regenx-generator-bitoroid-transformer-test-data-and-systems-efficiency www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/5-analysis-of-regenx-generator-coil-load-current-delay-164628634 www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/the-future-of-electric-power-generation-20-for-all-generations www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/electric-vehicle-regenerative-acceleration-innovation-presentation-for-india-ev-oems

@messengerofiexist2139 3 жыл бұрын

The earth is a giant capacitor, where does the energy come from that fills it? When you extract a portion of the energy from this capacitor will the capacitor be topped off?

@marcisgulbis9310 3 жыл бұрын

@@messengerofiexist2139 Google about T. H. Moray free energy receiver. Moray succeeded in tapping into earth capacitor, and extracted kilowatts of power.

@michaeld4861 3 жыл бұрын

@@marcisgulbis9310 sure but you can't do any of that without a working flux capacitor and a sizable rotary girder.

@SandyRiverBlue 4 жыл бұрын

Perpetual motion machines are a really great exercise in engineering efficiencies. The modern attempts at building these machines are amazingly efficient, just not perpetual.

@vijayanand8077 4 жыл бұрын

Brilliant msg

@radiousis49 4 жыл бұрын

ideal and reality I guess

@tejazm9140 4 жыл бұрын

Please state some examples and links for those videos

@jontom6375 4 жыл бұрын

Exactly. If we can remarkably increase efficiency to the point it creates enough energy to power a home for a month before it must be put into motion again, why are we allowing the powers that be to stick it to us like they do?

@baconscoobysnacks3135 3 жыл бұрын

@PotatoTornado that may be true but only with the technology we have available today

@chessmaster001 8 жыл бұрын

This is why we need Professor Farnsworth.

@chip1gray 8 жыл бұрын

Good news everybody!

@Colaglass 8 жыл бұрын

everyone

@jackreneau9586 8 жыл бұрын

I dont want to live on this planet any more

@alydeamz1292 8 жыл бұрын

ikr

@alydeamz1292 8 жыл бұрын

amy wong made a perpetual motion machine

@ZerofeverOfficial 8 жыл бұрын

Cats always land on their feet. Bread always lands butter side down. Attach bread to cats back butter side up. Attach Cat/Bread combo to generator. Boom, infinite energy.

@salvijusaukstikalnis5130 8 жыл бұрын

+Zerofever lol :D

@FernieCanto 8 жыл бұрын

+Zerofever No, because cats are the most powerful force in the Universe, as the Internet proves it.

@connorm3064 8 жыл бұрын

Really, ifunny?

@GamesFromSpace 8 жыл бұрын

+Zerofever You just end up with a superpositioned cat which is neither up nor down. And much like Schrodinger's cat, it will be very pissed off and make you regret experimenting on it.

@vipinpnair 8 жыл бұрын

+Zerofever haha :)

@Throefly 2 жыл бұрын

The hardest part about building a perpetual motion machine is finding where to hide the battery.

@hi_pd 2 жыл бұрын

...and a way to charge it secretly!

@crystal8870 2 жыл бұрын

OMG....another parrot

@khalifaisbacksoonly9401 2 жыл бұрын

Very good keep going

@finisend 4 ай бұрын

- Sun Tzu

@mattekanalenHz 7 жыл бұрын

You're wrong, my mom told me that if i just believe enough, anything is possible

@amritpalsingh517 7 жыл бұрын

Keep trying buddy! We are all counting on you!

@jlongworth3879 7 жыл бұрын

Tv-Tattaren you are converting spiritual (inspirational energy) into kinetic and potential energy, man you and your mom could solve many energy issues

@cryptonian7706 7 жыл бұрын

Did she also believe in a magical guy in the clouds?

@jackleo4435 7 жыл бұрын

CobraFitness yes

@apatheticdeity6030 7 жыл бұрын

unless you can use a black hole to move it I doubt that.

@mathewwinney8036 5 жыл бұрын

I made a perpetual motionless machine!

@mperdue12 5 жыл бұрын

So I have a time machine.

@benaressacred4774 5 жыл бұрын

It probably doesn't do anything

@mathewwinney8036 5 жыл бұрын

Benares Sacred you got it...it does absolutely nothing!

@benaressacred4774 5 жыл бұрын

@@mathewwinney8036 Like I said, it's good for nothing

@ArcanisUrriah 4 жыл бұрын

That is just me on the sofa watching youtube.......

@kentharris7427 5 жыл бұрын

I'm building a Perpetual Motion machine on my 3D printer. 12 volt battery and motor required!

@aryandivyanshu8324 5 жыл бұрын

Kent Harris Why don't we print batteries and use those batteries to fuel the printer? It's big brain time.

@RedFox-dj7di 5 жыл бұрын

Lol

@arenceagcaoili9368 4 жыл бұрын

Talk about batteries not included!

@rajpandey8694 4 жыл бұрын

@Nolan Klein is r/whooosh used for ur case?

@MistahSesy 4 жыл бұрын

funny :]

@LouisBertrandTech 4 жыл бұрын

"It's all very simple, and so are you if you think it'll work." -- Rube Goldberg I never knew that he was a real person. Brilliant!

@johncochran8497 6 жыл бұрын

Laws of thermodynamics 1. You can't win. 2. You can't break even unless it's a really cold day. 3. It can't get that cold.

@firefish111 5 жыл бұрын

*WHO FORGOT THE 0TH ONE???*

@jeremysmith8035 3 жыл бұрын

Talking if which, you cannot get to absolute zero as it would require an infinite amount of energy, there is an absolute hot ,called the planc temperature ,where the energy radiated has a wavelength shorter than the planc distance, which is the smallest size with any meaning, to give you an idea how hot that is, a pin head at planc temperature would instantly vaporise the solar system

@MikkoRantalainen 2 жыл бұрын

@@jeremysmith8035 It wouldn't happen instantly, though. The effect would radiate at the speed of the light max.

@jamescollings9290 8 жыл бұрын

"no" - there that was easy.

@nocontext4454 8 жыл бұрын

same thing and thoughts most women say to you after you come onto them.

@jamescollings9290 8 жыл бұрын

Brilliant! - so do you disagree with that answer or just couldn't pass up the opportunity for that (hilarious and original) joke?

@schadenfreudebuddha 7 жыл бұрын

it's kinda too late to say no after you already let the guy come onto you...at that point, you just need a towel.

@gufranagufrana3661 7 жыл бұрын

بالمعلمين كل انجليزيه

@morallyemptycorruptedmaggot 7 жыл бұрын

James Collings thanks

@kallo182 8 жыл бұрын

We in Germany have already the unlimited Energy Machine. Its made from a Cat, and one slice Toast Brot. Since Cats ALWAYS land on the Legs. And Toast Brot ALWAYS land on the Butter side... when both fall down, you only Need to put the Toast Brot on the Back of the Cat and let them both fall down. It will spin neverendless, since the Cat will land on the Legs, and the Brot will land on the Butter side. And since this Construction will spin neverless you have unlimited Energy. We use this Machine in our House. You only Need to feed the Cat from day to day. Thats it.

@PepeCaspers 8 жыл бұрын

Haha, thats funny!

@VSafaryan 8 жыл бұрын

Why not put two butter sandwiches with the butter on opposite sides? Won't have to feed the cat

@iferlyf8172 8 жыл бұрын

And if toast always landing on the butter side was true, it would actually work, unlike the cat and toast thing. If the cat lands on it's feet, the toast doesn't land anyway as it stays on the cat's back, so it never reaches the ground :P

@ahmedelhori6009 8 жыл бұрын

Spendet ihm bitte ein Lachen

@JorgenLePoulpe 8 жыл бұрын

German engineering at its finest

@aimanjamil5454 3 жыл бұрын

The only thing that really perpetual is our thoughts looking for perpetual machines.

@knowledgeispower9724 3 жыл бұрын

if they werent real would we still be looking for them ? no. why does uspto say i cant patent my free energy device ? i thought they dont exist ?

@somethingelse9535 3 жыл бұрын

@@knowledgeispower9724 There are 2 types of people looking for perpetual motion machines, those who dont understand physics and con artists. You can find the latter on youtube with their perpetual motion wheels, they use a compressed air nozzel off screen to keep the wheel turning.

@moguldamongrel3054 3 жыл бұрын

@@somethingelse9535 wonder what I'm using mwahahaha

@kaboom-zf2bl 8 ай бұрын

the universe ... we live in it .... and it's been going for 16.5 BILLION years ... thats as perpetual as one can get .... PROOVE external energy is being added ... no one can ... there are theories but NO PROOF ... but we can proove the universe is still going ... we are alive within it ...

@Pawn87 8 жыл бұрын

What was the energy source for the creation of energy in the first place?

@physicsgirl 8 жыл бұрын

That's a really good question. There was energy in the universe from the very start. Where did the universe come from? That question is a bit more complicated.

@AGRIMJAIN27 8 жыл бұрын

+Physics Girl dark matter I suppose

@NickyG589 8 жыл бұрын

+Physics Girl It's 42

@wood-eye 8 жыл бұрын

+Kaneehh Energy is not conserved in cosmological scales in general relativity. The energy of the universe seems to have come from a process called reheating. Asking how "energy was created" is like asking how "temperature was created". It's just a property of systems.

@ireallyreallyhategoogle 8 жыл бұрын

+Kaneehh Mass

@Jossandoval 8 жыл бұрын

The three Laws of thermodynamic: 1.- You cannot win. For any energy invested in a system, you can't obtain more than its equivalent in work and heath in a given system. 2.- You cannot tie. In any given system, the hotter parts cannot maintain their temperature and will invariably get colder, until the total temperature averages. 3.- You cannot stop playing. No matter the system, the minimum temperature is absolute zero. If our universe can be considered a closed system, the far, far, faaaaaaaaaaaar future is a cold and lonely place.

@Kneedragon1962 8 жыл бұрын

+José Sandoval Wonderful description. LOL. It would be terribly discouraging if it was not hysterically funny. It sounds like politics. (1) You cannot win. (2) You cannot draw. (3) You must keep playing, and everything turns to sh1+ in the end. Where is Donald Trump when I need him? Behold, exhibit 1.

@KimberlyRPeacock 8 жыл бұрын

+José Sandoval True, but what about a system which never goes above local temperature, it is at best equal to it, and periodically oscillates to a temperature below ambient as a result of a reversible chemical reaction, it takes time for the signal to propagate and the signal alternates between ambient and this temp drop. It is dependent upon local temperature being above x to perform the osccilation at a positive pressure but it can maintain internal energy for very long periods of time, while continuously outputting work. For work is not energy, work is the process of deformation resulting from energy flow!

@swanclipper 8 жыл бұрын

+Kimberly Peacock every thing dissipates energy, there is nothing that keeps more energy it was provided with to begin with. work is only the event which is created by energy.... no energy = no work.... cold universe = no movement = no energy = no work, work is generally observed as something which was initiated, something usually uses energy to make things happen no matter the scale, even if something was internally hot, for instance a planet, that would be the result of transferred energy from the surface and as the energy gathers in the center of the planet it gets hotter in a smaller space, no more energy than it was initially supplied with. just more concentrated but soon the ambient temperature will override and cool it in the same way. i understand your thuoghts but unfortunately, from what i am aware of, it's not right. work is always the result of energy somehow. i'd get really deep into this but most people don't like lengthy replies.

@KimberlyRPeacock 8 жыл бұрын

+swanclipper "Silly Rabbit tricks are for kids. " Yes everything dissipates energy it's called entropy; unless constrained from doing so. Such as if your heat engine never rises above ambient temperature then internal energy is maintained at what is was at ambient temperature. If you have an oscillating temperature 15K plus or minus where the 15K plus is equal to ambient, and you insulated it and have thermal mass some distance away, the signal cancels out within a distance and time. (This is what the temperature is constant at 60 feet down within the earth within 1 F annually) You will never find a violation of physics in what I am saying, and you will not out science me! But please be skeptical and ask good, hard questions, and I shall answer, and then maybe you will understand and others as well. I do not claim a perpetual motion machine or over unity. What I do claim is that energy can be conserved in an oscillatory loop for years, and that one can continue to produce useful work over that time.

@KimberlyRPeacock 8 жыл бұрын

+Rainbow Hyphen Agreed, nothing is forever except energy. I'm only 99.999% sure of that.

@CeriusDeluge 6 жыл бұрын

I have been working on a perpetual motion machine since 6th grade. Oddly enough I can't seem to stop.

@soultheory8441 6 жыл бұрын

Cerius Deluge keep at it, the world needs people who are obsessed with things that could help our world

@samdowns5885 6 жыл бұрын

I get it.

@cthulhujankinx5652 6 жыл бұрын

Lol

@demesnebrooks6275 6 жыл бұрын

Soul Theory r/wooosh

@markhaus 6 жыл бұрын

I hope you're at least learning things or having fun while you do it because somehow I don't think you'll get there

@igxniisan6996 4 жыл бұрын

*There are many viewers here, who watch* *_“AMERICAN TECH”_* *I think they got pissed of after seeing this video, excellent, they got what they deserve...😂* *Really excited to share this video to their channel...😏😂😂😂😂...*

@trimanbhullar647 8 жыл бұрын

is it just me or did she spin it in the wrong direction?

@Bagman57 8 жыл бұрын

+Triman Bhullar Yea she spins it in the wrong direction.

@Drakwdeanrer 8 жыл бұрын

ILLLUMINATI CONFIRMED!!! :D

@calvinscheuerman 8 жыл бұрын

not that it matters, but yeah. it still would not work in the other direction.

@aposeastwood200 8 жыл бұрын

yup

@nickhaze4647 8 жыл бұрын

+Calvin Lee Not that we'll ever know, because we had a mentally inadequate individual leading the demonstration. :/

@jugulator0 6 жыл бұрын

Every Gym in the planet should be connected to the electricity grid...You get paid to workout on par with your energy output...Any merit to this?

@thetheory6159 6 жыл бұрын

Paying people to workout wouldn't be viable. Linking gyms to electricity grids so people pay to workout, as usual, but also contribute to making power could have some merit.

@scottb9997 6 жыл бұрын

that would be great except youd need to burn about 2 million calories for $1 of electricity assuming that grid needed no maintenance do you even know how long that would take just to pay it self off let alone make money then you want people to burn enough to actually get paid

@jugulator0 6 жыл бұрын

Just an idea...

@charlierogers6332 6 жыл бұрын

But if millions of people are doing it's still a small contribution to a large problem

@scottb9997 6 жыл бұрын

good point but if you actually read what I said then youd realise that it wont be a contribution its just going to cost a lot more than it generates a lot more even 1 million people I doubt could produce more than $50 per session and the size and maintenance of a grid that size would be huge

@TheMonkeystick 6 жыл бұрын

"It's all very simple. And so are you if you think it'll work!" rofl

@sylvainh2o 6 жыл бұрын

you can use magnet to make an object float so no friction.

@TrueFlameslinger 6 жыл бұрын

Pralay Aryan It doesn't. That object can't produce free energy as any energy taken away would stop it.

@TrueFlameslinger 6 жыл бұрын

Also, 1) There are too many poorly edited cuts to be credible, and 2) If they aren't pushing it and cutting it, then there would obviously be a loss of energy in each turn. As each bottle going up needs more energy than what is created by the bottle going down directly 180° from it.

@paultucker2394 6 жыл бұрын

Her statement is correct about getting something for nothing. An imbalanced wheel works because it follows the laws of physics and mechanics of motion. The sum of the moments about a point must equal zero or there will be motion. In an imbalanced wheel, the sum if the moments about the center of the wheel are not equal to zero. Therefore, by the same laws of physics and mechanics, there absolutely must be motion. And, as long as the forces produced by the motion are greater than the forces of friction and air resistance, the motion will be perpetual. What she says is somewhat misleading. There is potential energy that is converted into kinetic energy in an imbalanced wheel. It is utilizing the force of gravity to covert the kinetic energy into work. So, that is the power source. However, she scuffs at it in the beginning. Gravity is the power source. Capillary action is a viable source as well. It is the based upon the force and attractive force of the surface tension of the water molecule. This is what make capillary action exist. If you were to draw water through pipets into a reservoir that spilled over a wheel the wheel could generate power. And the water could be drawn back to the top by the pipets. This would have to be a closed loop to or prevent contamination of the water an clogging of the pipets.

@Durzo1259 3 жыл бұрын

Even though I know it's impossible, every time perpetual motion is mentioned, my imagination can't stop from trying to figure out how to do it.

@GattacaKain 3 жыл бұрын

Here is a perpetual motion machine prototype: kzbin.info/www/bejne/a2Gkkppmf5WEm5Y

@Durzo1259 3 жыл бұрын

@@GattacaKain That was a design from the middle ages, long-since debunked.

@davidscottkrause1 2 жыл бұрын

It's not impossible. If you make a machine that runs on the temperature and atmospheric pressure changes on earth, it will run forever (since temp & pressure are guaranteed to change). Take, for example, the Atmos brand perpetual motion clocks that really do run forever.

@Durzo1259 2 жыл бұрын

@@davidscottkrause1 Or hydro-electric power, where water keeps evaporating and replenishing the rivers that run it. But that's not perpetual motion, it's just a giant fuel cell (the sun) that takes billions of years to exhaust.

@scienceblock 4 жыл бұрын

6.1k dislikes from people thinking a perpetual motion machine is possible just because of the title

@MistahSesy 4 жыл бұрын

alright

@t-wrecks7481 4 жыл бұрын

My guess is they're all flat earthers as well. ; )

@ursaevitas5 4 жыл бұрын

Most likely they only watched the parts that made it seem like she was advocating for the concept of PM, which she isn't. I found the intro to be silly myself, but the video's alright either way. So yeah, the dislikes are from bloody morons

@marianskodowski8337 4 жыл бұрын

And my dislike for those who don't think for themselves, but only get programmed by their gurus... at school :) This girl is brainwashed and doesn't know what she's talking about. You "educated" and "not morons" go and pay your bills for energy to them who laughing at you every day :) this is what you like.

@alanroberts7916 4 жыл бұрын

@1 million subscribers Before 2022 challenge no since? Oh...nonsense!

@vitoroliveira-ck5kc 8 жыл бұрын

you were rotating it the wrong way :\

@vitoroliveira-ck5kc 8 жыл бұрын

Ahahah xD

@mowu8459 8 жыл бұрын

maybe wind turbines ARE perpetual motion machines. and the government covers it up in favor of wind and junk!

@TheMADC999 8 жыл бұрын

why not buy one of these and see for yourself. Nothing is free in our universe

@TheMADC999 8 жыл бұрын

Hope Floats well oxygen is free but our planet has finite amount of it, plants use solar energy to turn CO2 to O2. So technically oxygen isn't free. Now you name things that are completely free.

@olebart7280 7 жыл бұрын

Nothing is actually free, like oxygen for your lung, as you need to use energy, or love, you need to use energy to find some one you can love. everything cost, maybe not money but it cost something else. so i got a task for you, try to find something that doesn't cost anything

@JoelCarli 6 жыл бұрын

"Lisa, in this household we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"

@BassMatriX 6 жыл бұрын

Joel Carli I came to the comments section looking explicitly for this. Thank you.

@matheusdesouza90 6 жыл бұрын

Is this... Is this from The Simpsons?

@malectric 2 жыл бұрын

The occasional visitor to my study still gets a kick out of seeing a couple of strings of coloured LEDs apparently being powered by a simple wire a few feet long strung around the study window (with a tuned circuit and earth connection present). Powered in fact by a local A.M. talkback radio station whose transmitting mast is located about a mile away running at about 1MHz. Best use yet I've found for the hot air emitted in the studio. It only stops if the station is shutdown for maintenance and once get stopped by a lightning strike to the mast.

8 жыл бұрын

Who will stay to confirm that someone has built a machine that will run forever :-)

@Rabijeel 8 жыл бұрын

+Jim Engström I. because, in Philosophy, forever can be an instant. And, do not tell me, that your cars engine is not running for ever if you wait for the green light, that takes forever to switch^^

@jf8138 8 жыл бұрын

+Jim Engström You two need to learn proper english... wtf are you guys saying

8 жыл бұрын

Jared Freeman Yes you are right, but English is my third language and I am poorly educated, and I has not afford to get better education right now, so I hope you still can understand me till that happens. Thank you.

@Rabijeel 8 жыл бұрын

Jared Freeman So, now I doublechecked my sentence. Please correct me, I can not find out where I supposed to be wrong.

8 жыл бұрын

Rabijeel I did understand you, so your spelling and grammar did work well for me :-)

@aardvark666666 8 жыл бұрын

There is a perpetual motion machine it's called the universe. There is gravity, dark energy, and vaccum energy

@vmarek98 8 жыл бұрын

nope, it's not.. it still follows the law of conservation of energy :)

@aardvark666666 8 жыл бұрын

my guess is its leaking out from a different dimension

@aardvark666666 8 жыл бұрын

dark energy gets stronger the farther objects are separated. it's really weird stuff

@NickNikolenko 8 жыл бұрын

We don't really know if 'dark' energy and matter even exist so you can't judge about it being a perpetual motion contributor, simply cause we know nothing about it :D

@aardvark666666 8 жыл бұрын

we know it exists just not what it is

@InnerLeopard 7 жыл бұрын

First law of thermodynamics, Energy is never created or lost, it just changes form.

@Dreammeditaterepeat 7 жыл бұрын

MrRampart so where did it all come from, Science says give us one free miracle we can explain the rest ;)

@cappuccinocoffee9734 7 жыл бұрын

so what happens to an energy when it is sucked by a black hole?

@cristianverdugogalaz8725 7 жыл бұрын

Mark Captain hawking's readiation

@Athanatoi 7 жыл бұрын

What was the energy source for the creation of energy in the first place?

@piranha031091 7 жыл бұрын

Mark Captain : it adds to the black hole's mass, through the famous mass-energy equivalence.

@natureinmotion2355 2 жыл бұрын

That's the spirit. "Keep looking for the energy source."

@theravedaddy 5 жыл бұрын

Please explain 'impossible' to my ex mate. He's been sat at home trying to make his fortune by nailing junk together for the last 25 years. The mortgage company arnt impressed.

@imback3200 5 жыл бұрын

if he's using grammar like you I can understand why

@theravedaddy 5 жыл бұрын

@@imback3200 why dont you correct it for me then? I left school many years ago and ive forgotten what its like to be lectured by a grammar nazi. BTW, its a capital I at the start of a sentence and you missed out the full stop at the end of your sentence, just sayin'......

@alecrosema4885 5 жыл бұрын

HAhHAH

@Nemoticon 5 жыл бұрын

No, don't.... let him waste his life on joke. You can tell him 'I told you so' EVERY DAY while laughing at him.

@the.reel.mccoy. 5 жыл бұрын

To be entirely honest, no great things ever came from someone who was afraid to do what your friend is doing. Some may call him foolish. I think he is a genius in and of his own right. I respect that he is attempting to discover something previously thought to be impossible. And, theoretically, perpetual motion is possible due to the "an object in motion tends to stay in motion unless acted upon." And all objects in space that we have observed are currently accelerating. Which means something is causing them to accelerate. Which means if we could discover what this cause of acceleration truly is, we could harness perpetual motion in space.

@EugeneKhutoryansky 8 жыл бұрын

There are also perpetual machines of the second kind, which obey the conservation of energy (first law of thermodynamics), but violate the law that the entropy of the universe always increases (second law of thermodynamics). Both perpetual motion machines of the first kind and of the second kind would theoretically solve all of humanity's energy needs forever, but both types are unfortunately also impossible according to the known laws of physics.

@IamGrimalkin 8 жыл бұрын

+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky There's also perpetual motion machines of the third kind (spin forever but you can't extract energy from them). These work, for example a superconducting ring with a magnetic field inside.

@UnorthodoxlyEsthetic 8 жыл бұрын

+IamGrimalkin Why can't you extract energy from them? Surely there's a way? As all energy is converted to another form at one point

@rodrigoappendino 8 жыл бұрын

+Hana A planet in vacuum with a constant speed is at perpetual motion, but if you try to extract energy from it, you would create a negative acceleration.

@IamGrimalkin 8 жыл бұрын

Hana Or rather, you can extract energy from them, but it causes the machine to slow down, or destroy the structure entirely. In the case of a superconducting ring, you can only take energy from the current by making a section of the ring non-superconducting, which destroys the structure of the device.

@KimberlyRPeacock 8 жыл бұрын

+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky This is not information entropy but thermodynamic entropy, which has nothing to do with disorder, but rather thermodynamic entropy which is concerned with energy density, and will go from greater density to lesser density unless constrained, and that is what the universe is about, chemical kinetics. Google entropysite .oxy.edu and understand what I am refering to.

@hellreptile 8 жыл бұрын

make it floating with some magnet magic and boom you got a zero friction wheel.

@50potatoes 8 жыл бұрын

Magnets demagnetize, so it's not perpetual

@Unown_B 8 жыл бұрын

Can you re magnetize the magnets with power made from the machine? like without stopping it or without removing them

@50potatoes 8 жыл бұрын

IIIICKKZEZOWIIII it might be possible but I'm not entirely sure

@jman3504 8 жыл бұрын

Indeed. I think magnets are the way to go for energy production and I dont mean electrical magnets, we are not wanting to be spending any power running it.

@antdru6797 8 жыл бұрын

or just put the wheel in space...either way, friction between the wheel and whatever the wheel is moving will always result in the wheel coming to rest.

@LordToxygene 2 жыл бұрын

Ah yes, I remember those early days on the internet when every garage engineer said they had invented a perpetual motion machine and that Big Government was the only reason they couldn't show the actual thing to you. 🤣

@georgecataloni4720 8 жыл бұрын

Now if only liberals could apply this to economics.

@uhohhotdog 8 жыл бұрын

Wtf does this have to do with economics?

@georgecataloni4720 8 жыл бұрын

orayole There's no such thing as free energy, just as there's no such thing as free products and services (which is provided through the energy of labor). Keep looking for the financial source.

@gremice31 8 жыл бұрын

+George Cataloni fair point lol

@uhohhotdog 8 жыл бұрын

George Cataloni No one believes products or services are actually free dipshit. Every single person realizes it's paid through taxes. It's better to spread payments out through taxes over your lifetime than to pay for things all upfront. Especially things like healthcare and education.

@culwin 8 жыл бұрын

+George Cataloni If only conservatives could apply this to economics.

@TheFatPunisher 7 жыл бұрын

I saved like 70 dollars on my electric bill by plugging a power strip into itself. you only need to plug it in once and it cycles the electricity infinitely

@georgecampos2164 7 жыл бұрын

The Fat Punisher well what ever do you mean please elaborate more on your discovery it's much intriguing and something to ponder about.

@TheFatPunisher 7 жыл бұрын

@krassburg 7 жыл бұрын

1) plug the world to your power strip 2) profit.

@jojolafrite90 7 жыл бұрын

And you could save the WORLD! By plugging yourself directly into any wall socket! IF all people that would believe in such things did it, it would definitely achieve SOME good.

@kiwigaming5468 7 жыл бұрын

Mega Maclou 2 is ? 3 is profit

@KindOfyeah 6 жыл бұрын

Anyone triggered that she keeps turning the wheel the wrong way

@fermiticus4034 6 жыл бұрын

I thought something looked "off".

@ram5ramen582 6 жыл бұрын

Not always

@itskillerluc6168 6 жыл бұрын

M8than v

@ciddyboy718 6 жыл бұрын

Threw my galaxy s8 at the wall to make her stop; she did, I'm now out 800 bucks.

@TheDrexxus 6 жыл бұрын

It doesn't really have a "wrong way" because either way is wrong. It's a useless hunk of junk.

@ImranMughal-ju1wk 3 жыл бұрын

If perpetual motion can't exist, then how did the universe begin...that WAS energy from nothing.

@bowlseriw 3 жыл бұрын

at the moment before big bang all our laws of physics break down , so anything can be possible in that moment ( except that time or space for that matter did not exist)

@Dumbrarere 5 жыл бұрын

Homer: "Lisa, get in here!" Lisa: "Yes, dad?" Homer: "In this house we obey the laws of THERMODYNAMICS!"

@adolfhitler7011 5 жыл бұрын

Homie

@draneym2003 4 жыл бұрын

That thing was such a joke. It just went faster and faster

@petzIndiadotcom 4 жыл бұрын

😁

@benclark1482 8 жыл бұрын

Not saying she's wrong but we could greatly reduce friction with magnets

@theamici 8 жыл бұрын

magnets demagnetize over time

@anjum311 8 жыл бұрын

+emilnyb what? Really?

@corncobjohnsonreal 8 жыл бұрын

+arif shaikh no once a magnet always a manget

@theamici 8 жыл бұрын

Corncob Johnson wrong, magnets demagnetize

@anjum311 8 жыл бұрын

Corncob Johnson yaa that's what I belived all my life but seems like you can't trust anyone these days even magnets

@PrestonSmithsMusic 8 жыл бұрын

"It's all very simple...and so are you if you think it will work." Best answer.

@iansarmiento23 4 жыл бұрын

"Energy can neither be created nor destroyed" *Me thinking of the big bang:* They told us lies

@mystic3549 3 жыл бұрын

Actually chemical energy was stored in singularity which provided every energy we see today..so basically it didnt violate :)

@gabrieljohnson1118 3 жыл бұрын

@@mystic3549 Where did that energy come from? -Me, who has near 0 understanding of that sentence.

@marcisgulbis9310 3 жыл бұрын

Energy is created in every electric generator. In conventional electrical generator, created energy is used to do negative work and decelerate rotor. In ReGenX generator, created energy is used to do positive work and accelerate rotor. Current is delayed in time domain, and start to flow, when magnet has already passed top dead center of the coil. There is 20 magnets on rotor. When rotor rotates with 3600 rpms, frequency is 1200 Hz . Regenerative acceleration effect occurs above critical minimum frequency. www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/reidentifying-or-universe-as-an-infinite-system-rather-than-a-closed-system www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/history-of-pdi-innovations-2005-2020 www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/final-version-electric-vehicle-regenerative-acceleration-innovation-presentation-for-international-ev-oems 1 ReGenX coil can provide 1000 W of electrical power without mechanical power input. 10 ReGenX coils can power electric car forever. 100 ReGenX coils can power Tesla Semi truck forever. www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/final-2018-report-for-siemens-regenx-generator-bitoroid-transformer-test-data-and-systems-efficiency www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/5-analysis-of-regenx-generator-coil-load-current-delay-164628634 www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/the-future-of-electric-power-generation-20-for-all-generations www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/electric-vehicle-regenerative-acceleration-innovation-presentation-for-india-ev-oems

@yoshikagekira6166 3 жыл бұрын

No mass was always preserved in the singularity. No energy was created just expanded and reformed

@marcisgulbis9310 3 жыл бұрын

@@yoshikagekira6166 There is aether energy field around us. Electric dipoles and magnetic dipoles can extract energy from aether, without violating law of conservation of energy. If we ignore existence of aether, energy extraction from aether looks like perpetual motion.

@jmack4275 8 жыл бұрын

I have a perpetual motion machine in my pants and the source of energy is deez nuts

@MafiaFil 8 жыл бұрын

+Jmack 4275 LMAO

@YouAreSafeNow 8 жыл бұрын

+Jmack 4275 I LOL'd.

@andyspark5192 8 жыл бұрын

So, you're immortal and you don't need food or oxygen. COOL

@MafiaFil 8 жыл бұрын

Andy Spark do you even jokes?

@iambotbeepboopba6732 8 жыл бұрын

perpetual motions is impossible violates fundamental laws of physics how many times are we going go over this sigh...

@colepersinger6151 8 жыл бұрын

what if you were to use some kind of magnets to hold the wheel then did this in 0 gravity do you think it whould work

@benscott4574 8 жыл бұрын

Magnets slowly lose their magnetic charge.

@jonhohensee3258 8 жыл бұрын

Get an education.

@jonhohensee3258 8 жыл бұрын

OBVIOUSLY

@righteouswizdum2460 8 жыл бұрын

with enough work one could use the hydrogen in water (the process of electrolysis) to cause an engine to turn, then using this to turn an alternator and charge a battery to power the process of electrolysis.

@the.reel.mccoy. 5 жыл бұрын

To be entirely honest, if the machine is converting an essentially infinite form of ambient energy from one form into kinetic energy, which arguably, is the most usable form of energy, then it deserves to be considered semi-perpetual motion in my book :)

@snakedoktor6020 3 жыл бұрын

...converting an...

@janami-dharmam 2 жыл бұрын

It is similar to a wind turbine machine; the wind flows because to small temp diff on the earth's surface at diff places.

@Derekzparty 2 жыл бұрын

Eventually the water would evaporate from the bowl. Filling up the bowl requires energy.

@clacl8647 2 жыл бұрын

@@Derekzparty false. why would the water evaporate?

@Derekzparty 2 жыл бұрын

@@clacl8647 Water evaporates because the molecules on the surface achieve sufficient kinetic energy to overcome liquid-phase intermolecular forces. Do I really have to defend that evaporation is real?

@netherstarbuild 4 жыл бұрын

technically a perpetual motion machine is possible if in a vacuum an at 0g, (its just if any resistance is applied it will stop)

@VivasPuertorriquenos 7 ай бұрын

Could a wheel spin in a zero g environment?

@unclenegan6694 7 жыл бұрын

first fidget spinner ever

@meepmeep2525 6 жыл бұрын

and as you can see, it was also big just like most prototypes 😂

@dddmemaybe 6 жыл бұрын

^this is my man Xd

@tissiflex3998 7 жыл бұрын

4:29 if its solar panels donot look at the energy sourse

@sambressman6113 6 жыл бұрын

mathias nielsen ha

@tomman1718 5 жыл бұрын

i built a perpetual motion machine, but the men in black suites killed me and destroyed all the documents...

@BrainPermaDeD 4 жыл бұрын

So have fun in heaven 🖕

@marcisgulbis9310 3 жыл бұрын

@johnlshilling1446 3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, me too. The first time hurt the worst. It's getting easier...

@eternalmiasma5586 4 жыл бұрын

What’s so infuriating about these is that you can, in your mind at least, get SO CLOSE. You feel like you are right at the gate of something great.

@Durzo1259 3 жыл бұрын

Glad it's not just me. I can't help trying to work it out in my mind, even though I know it's impossible, until I've got such an elaborate and brilliant thing going... except for that one hiccup. There's always a damn hiccup.

@eustacehendrix9659 3 жыл бұрын

There's nothing wrong in doing so as long as you don't claim that you worked it out and you haven't. Books have been rewritten and it can be again. But for now, the Laws of Thermodynamics is a solid ground we can stand on.

@JackLe1127 6 жыл бұрын

What bothers me the most in this video is that she keeps turning them in the wrong direction.

@thetheory6159 6 жыл бұрын

It still wouldn't spin forever.

@Heikki_Finland 6 жыл бұрын

But her credibility would stay forever.

@doncody6000 6 жыл бұрын

Right, and the first wheel was made completely wrong!!

@blueckaym 6 жыл бұрын

or perhaps her incredibility? ;)

@dushk0 6 жыл бұрын

There sure is a wrong way - the direction she spins it towards, causes the wheel to stop earlier, and then it even gets a backspin.

@jaysuwu2423 6 жыл бұрын

sadly it's been patched

@oliverpalmer7855 7 жыл бұрын

Nobody here is even talking about rube goldberg's epic roast at the the end

@disco1974ever 7 жыл бұрын

Gold

@stevenbaumann8692 6 жыл бұрын

Oliver Palmer that was pretty epic.

@simeonnewman7639 6 жыл бұрын

Fantastic roasting.

@harmonyOfEureka 6 жыл бұрын

The ending killed me :v

@BertGrink 6 жыл бұрын

that ending was like the tittle over the i

@dandaniels851 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah Yeah, I already know the truth 🤓 I just like to hear it from physics girl ⚘

@Huntracony 8 жыл бұрын

Theoretically you could build a perpetual motion machine, but you'd never be able to get any energy from it. But if no energy is put in and no energy is taken out of the machine, it'll stay the same energy level. Probably the closest thing we have right now to a perpetual motion machine are satellites. They move forever around our planet without any energy input. Except they don't. What we call vacuum actually has a few particles which slow the satellites down, other planets and the moon affects the satellites over time and the sun heats them up.

@terrait 8 жыл бұрын

+Huntracony A perpetual motion machine isn't even possible theoretically, look up carnot cycle

@Huntracony 8 жыл бұрын

***** Sorry, I do not understand it from reading the Wikipedia article. Why would it not be possible for something to move forever when the amount of energy in the system doesn't change?

@StarryBlue321 8 жыл бұрын

+Huntracony Inertia. The word you're looking for is inertia.

@realspacemodels 8 жыл бұрын

+Huntracony Satellites most certainly have an energy input. It's the rocket that propels them into orbit in the first place. That initial energy input gives the satellite it's motion. With no friction they would stay in orbit not forever, but for a long time. Gravity, solar wind and depending on the altitude, the upper atmosphere, all act against the satellite to reduce that initial energy input and deorbit the vehicle. The ISS is low enough that it does still get drag from the upper atmosphere and has to be lifted to a higher orbit from time to time. Satellites that are sent out of the solar system, like Voyager or New Horizons rely on gravity assists to augment their initial energy input from the launch vehicle, but even so, they would be really poor perpetual motion machines since we don't get any work out of their motion.

@Huntracony 8 жыл бұрын

RealSpaceModels and i mentioned all of those things in my comment.

@Willy-nu3oc 8 жыл бұрын

who's coming from snowpiercer?

@adominable1 8 жыл бұрын

Willy not me, but that's a great movie

@nuwbers 7 жыл бұрын

Willy who

@Willy-nu3oc 7 жыл бұрын

Nuwbers Crazy sorry, what do you mean by "who"?

@nuwbers 7 жыл бұрын

Willy what is that

@Willy-nu3oc 7 жыл бұрын

Nuwbers Crazy that is what

@Jeagles 4 жыл бұрын

Short answer: no Long answer: no coz friction Done

@papalouie5517 4 жыл бұрын

Lol

@oh_tassos 4 жыл бұрын

well, while I don't think it would work, I have thought of a design which in paper works (abusing air so no friction really)

@Jeagles 4 жыл бұрын

Oh Tassos anything that exists in atmosphere or touches something else has friction acting on it

@oh_tassos 4 жыл бұрын

makes sense, one of the main reasons i had big doubts about my idea

@Knort 4 жыл бұрын

@Atharv Khatri was just thinking about that and quantum locking

@jimmyperkins97 4 жыл бұрын

Make the coins heavier problem solved

@itskodas 6 жыл бұрын

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, Only transferred

@hamzachaudary6957 6 жыл бұрын

Kakoda where does energy come from if it cant be created

@desjardiniii5795 6 жыл бұрын

Kakoda the 3rd law of thermodynamics

@red5032 6 жыл бұрын

TennesseeBoy13 Why exactly did you need to write that reply?

@superdutyzack 6 жыл бұрын

Kakoda what about when an atom is split and causes an explosion? Are atoms pretty much energy? And if one explodes is it not destroyed?

@superdutyzack 6 жыл бұрын

Simion Usatov So your saying the atom is just split into smaller particles?

@txlec99 5 жыл бұрын

Life { "you cant get something, for nothing" }

@aminbaloch6263 5 жыл бұрын

But in physic nothing is something It shows there is possiblity

@marianskodowski8337 4 жыл бұрын

Ooouuugh... really? Go ask Lawrence Krauss and other quantum mechanic physicists. They say the Universe started from absolute Nothing in Big Bang! They teach that students at schools, I can't understand why most of them fight so hard against the idea of free energy then? Idiots.

@0623kaboom 3 жыл бұрын

nature if you balance everything just right you can get everything for ever ... 16+ BILLION years ... the Universe ... PROVEN perpetual motion ... and it is still going ... science is wrong NATURE is right

@anonymous-tn6ij 6 жыл бұрын

Did you say wind turbans ?But who would wear them

@detective_yeti 6 жыл бұрын

The wind, duh

@dew12u 6 жыл бұрын

air heads

@nathenhutchison6182 6 жыл бұрын

If I wear a wind turban, can it charge my phone while I'm walking?

@jdh2024 6 жыл бұрын

dew12u: that is the best joke on the Internet today!

@JikuAraiguma 6 жыл бұрын

Now I have this image in my head of a turban with one of those little propeller hat propellers on it.

@Sciencedoneright 3 жыл бұрын

2:27 Me: *Types it in google and realises snake oil is a real thing* Diana: *OH NO THAT WAS BAD*

@dopefish86 5 жыл бұрын

so these birds can fix climate change and the energy problem at the same time!!! amazing! we need more of them.

@krikeydial3430 2 жыл бұрын

You could make a big one and have it geared to spin an alternator. Who cares if the the energy comes from the sun if its free?

@anisleebibart6485 6 жыл бұрын

I swear I'm gonna invent one that does work. Then everybody can pay me their light bill lol

@marcisgulbis9310 3 жыл бұрын

@GorgonDrageil 5 жыл бұрын

I DON'T CARE what Physics thinks! *I'm gonna make my perpetual motion machine!* 😭😭😭

@Xx-xd3zo 4 жыл бұрын

Do it!

@thetop3351 4 жыл бұрын

@@josephkreifelsii6596 god bless you

@ektadhapola9698 4 жыл бұрын

Same 😭😭😭

@justaheart9932 4 жыл бұрын

Go do it humans can do everything Humans created laws of physics We can also break it

@murugans4513 4 жыл бұрын

May I join with yo😁😁😁

@Allin7days 4 жыл бұрын

"You can't get something for nothing." Who knew such a philosophical statement came from physics? lol

@marcisgulbis9310 3 жыл бұрын

@ehrix4468 7 жыл бұрын

It's that thing you learn in science class: Energy can neither be created or destroyed. Edit: she just said it. Dang it.

@DogMan077 7 жыл бұрын

Energy can't be created nor destroyed only transferred.

@TechTubeHDReviews 7 жыл бұрын

Ender Vaults well somebody read the textbook.

@vsr9105 7 жыл бұрын

Ender Vaults Wow, you must be Einstein!

@Predated1 7 жыл бұрын

Well, it can be, technically, but we need to be able to break the barriers of this universe. I mean, eventually things had to come from nothing, thus be "created"(altho I rather refer to it as forming)

@Predated1 7 жыл бұрын

I never even implied a god at all. Something simply had to come from nothing, no matter how you look at it. How can something come from nothing? There is no answer to that question yet.

@jojolafrite90 7 жыл бұрын

There can be no starting point. It's a paradox, unfortunately... Even the big bang HAD to be caused by some "older" event. Like, for example, a star becoming a black hole in a universe that would happen to have one of those fabled missing dimensions perceivable to consciousness (there kind of need to be sentient beings in a universe, because what is causing the wave function to collapse into atoms that are determined in space and time? The fact that something sentient observes something). It is only one possibility... We have some theories, but no real knowledge of what caused the big bang.

@pointer2null 7 жыл бұрын

The fun (and hard bit sometimes) is spotting the hidden power source in the fake perpetual motion machines.

@Sturmo12 7 жыл бұрын

pointer2null That's exactly why I like these, as well as the flatearth and moon landing hoax videos! Always trying to spot the errors.

@runforitman 7 жыл бұрын

Also I love the ones that have stupid music instead of audio No doubt to hide the loud motor

@GHOSTKILLERAAA 3 жыл бұрын

Here is an old school magnetic-gravitic perpetual machine: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJyvl6OOpbRoqbM

@dustin8420 8 жыл бұрын

Anyone tried a magnetic setup? How would that work with no friction? Does a magnetic bearing give 0 friction? Or would you need a superconductor?

@poketopa1234 8 жыл бұрын

The magnets themeselves can create friction with the air, and also moving magnets can create a current, which heat something up, losing energy.

@dustin8420 8 жыл бұрын

poketopa1234 So we run it in a vacuum chamber, and make the rest of it out of a material that doesn't conduct electricity?

@poketopa1234 8 жыл бұрын

DB Gaming everything conducts electricity to some degree, although let's assume it can't. There are very slight tidal forces from orbiting bodies that can slow it down, although let's assume it doesn't. Black body radiation can radiate away energy, although let's assume it doesn't. Isotopes can decay, releasing energy, but let's assume it doesn't. If it's rotating then there's gonna be a stress on the spokes, in order to keep it turning around. Tbh idk enough about stresses to know if it would break or lose energy, but that might be a problem. Otherwise, yes. Isolate all external forces and energy radiation and you got yourself a perpetual motion machine. :)

@titan133760 8 жыл бұрын

+DB Gaming There would still be gravity slowing it down. Contrary to popular belief, every object has its own gravity

@bzakie2 8 жыл бұрын

+DB Gaming then you'll need heaps of power to cool the superconductor.

@matiasc1944 6 жыл бұрын

1:20 you moving it at the incorrect way lol hahaha

@MichaelClark-uw7ex 7 жыл бұрын

So-called "magnet machines " cannot run forever. They depend on permanent magnets and even permanent magnets are not permanent, they eventually loose their magnetism. Even one with nothing impinging on the magnetic field eventually decays, if you move anything magnetic or conductive through the field it decays more quickly.

@BritishBeachcomber 7 жыл бұрын

Hrile there is no permanent source of energy. that's the whole point. everything decays eventually. energy is only useful when there is an imbalance, a gradient. when all the energy in the universe has been "used", it's spread out so evenly, there is nothing but cold. absolute zero.

@MichaelClark-uw7ex 7 жыл бұрын

Hrile Ever hear of entropy? There is no such thing as a permanent source of energy.

@Fireball_Roberts 7 жыл бұрын

Magnet motors don't depend on anything because they don't work, period. Magnets aren't like batteries. Magnets store energy the same way a spring stores energy.

@markkmiecik9797 3 жыл бұрын

Perpetual motion machines are possible. Literally hundreds of designs exist. Unfortunately, none of them work.

@ashcla 8 жыл бұрын

The drinking bird section is a little misleading, the drinking bird's energy source is actually the evaporative cooling of the water it absorbs by "drinking" the water (i.e. it's driven by entropy.) The bird would keep drinking even if the water was the exact same temperature as the air around it, as long as the relative humidity of the air isn't 100%. That does complicate things though, so I can see why you left it out. Otherwise, great video as always! :)

@issaknife1379 8 жыл бұрын

It's all very simple, and so are you if u think it won't work haha

@issaknife1379 8 жыл бұрын

will *

@marianskodowski8337 8 жыл бұрын

+HashtagKingd0m She's got a girly mind and that's her limitation as for human being :) It's enough to observe planets to came to conclusion that the perpetual motion is possible.

@srproductions8798 8 жыл бұрын

+Maria Kurna Skłodowska that called gravity...that is different

@issaknife1379 8 жыл бұрын

Maria Kurna Skłodowska actually its not, everything will eventually come to a stop

@marianskodowski8337 8 жыл бұрын

HashtagKingd0m :) any strong proof? or we just say it because we think it's right. This reminds me some theology in Europe before the WW II, especially in Germany - Dead of God Theology. Physics is no longer a science on certain levels - it's a philosophy. When we go for philosophy of death then we come to think that any movement in Universe will stop one day.

@genessab 7 жыл бұрын

The unbalanced wheel doesn't work because of rotational inertia and the fact that the side with less coins is farther away from the center of mass.

@peooh 7 жыл бұрын

she rotate wrong direction

@hatsunemiku5694 7 жыл бұрын

Vikings488 Lmao smarty

@derpyfish281 7 жыл бұрын

Vikings488 yeah, it has around the same torque on either side

@cheblack677 7 жыл бұрын

And too much frictions. If not it works.

@saurabh4491 7 жыл бұрын

Even though I am big fan of this channel. But this video is just not making any sense. Leonardo Da Vinci has given many working perpetual model. I just don't get the point, why they want us to convince that perpetual motion is not possible. Do the big companies fear to face a lose in future if people learn about these. Tesla generator is working as a free and clean energy source. Why still many government banned free source of energies in many countries? And regarding the unbalanced wheel: Simple solution to physics girl.. Try reducing the friction with some lubrication so that the friction don't stop the movement. And second point, rotate the wheel in correct direction. And please many people in the world are working to achieve this goal in an efficient way. Don't call their work as a waste of time. And regarding the drinking bird toy. I too agree that its not a pure perpetual motion. But my suggestion here is don't try to mix up two different things. And you also said that US patent office has stopped giving patent for perpetual designs. Off course, they have to. They can see that now people have successfully created some devices and if they gets their patent, they will be able to use their designs to put them into production. And US economy is heavily based on oil sources which US has reserved from a long time for future trades. And if the demand of oil in international market decreases due to increase in free energy, US economy will face a big damage. So yes, US gov. is against free energy. And this is not the first time US gov has done something like this for the first time. I don't have time and energy to write everything here. Anyone can google them and there is no doubt about that US will do anything to remain powerful.

@martinkuliza 3 жыл бұрын

Let's just be honest here, ok we know it's not possible without even watching the video but we come here anyway to see her smile and the educational value LOL

@oglehhassan2040 6 жыл бұрын

You can't get something for nothing

@AjaxWallpapers 6 жыл бұрын

do your research, try google

@oglehhassan2040 6 жыл бұрын

AjaxWallpapers okay thanks

@AjaxWallpapers 6 жыл бұрын

;-) kzbin.info/www/bejne/b6bVdnmllq5kn7s

@Grimmstone1 6 жыл бұрын

Equivalent exchange

@larjkok1184 6 жыл бұрын

Can you get nothing from something? No. If you don’t get anything then nothing was got. There is no getting.

@raket4852 8 жыл бұрын

You would need to build a machine that creates enough energy to power itself and also give away energy.

@l.l.5948 8 жыл бұрын

Yeah, but that's impossible.

@raket4852 8 жыл бұрын

Yeah, right now

@bluedemon9985 8 жыл бұрын

So basically a nuclear reactor. Mass is converted into energy, that energy is used to power all of the controls and safety measures of the reactor. Any extra energy goes to people. However that is not perpetual because the source of energy is the nuclear material which gives off energy.

@ryokuhasu9699 8 жыл бұрын

I'd call an Orbit a working PMM. The act of perpetually falling can be considered a PPM. Think about it, gravity is the cause of the orbit, but no energy is transferred from the orbit itself when suspended in a vacuum with little to no outside gravitational force and ideally in such a vacuum no friction would apply to the slowing of the Orbit PMM. It is also self starting in nature and has been running for trillions of years.

@l.l.5948 8 жыл бұрын

Ryoku Hasu Orbiting needs energy.

@seraphinasmith4515 8 жыл бұрын

what if you suspended the unbalanced wheel with magnets?

@seraphinasmith4515 8 жыл бұрын

(this would make no friction)

@jchevertonwynne 8 жыл бұрын

Jacob Smith air resistance is still a thing. also you can't extract energy from it of you can't touch it, so it'd be useless

@DoveWrestler 8 жыл бұрын

I'll give a little bit more of an answer: The friction in the mechanical bearing is the biggest source of friction, but not the only one. Second would be air resistance. With permanent magnet bearings and a vacuum chamber, you can significantly reduce both of these. The next source of friction to be avoided is from the spinning of the earth, as over the course of 24 hours, the system will be rotated around the earth's axis causing a gyroscopic effect. This can be avoided aligning the axis of your system with the axis of rotation of earth (point north/south if you are on the equator). By this point, your wheel device will run for quite a long time before stopping, but not forever. There are two things still slowing your wheel down. One is the few molecules of air still remaining in your chamber (a true vacuum chamber has never been made). The other is tidal forces from the earth, moon and sun. Unfortunately, there are no known solutions to these sources of friction, so although your wheel can be made to spin a very long time, it can not be made to be perpetual. In truth, it will be slowing down from the moment you start it up.

@seraphinasmith4515 7 жыл бұрын

Dear god I was hypothesizing

@DoveWrestler 7 жыл бұрын

Just trying to help your hypothesis. Many people think that scientists haven't figured out a PMM because they haven't tried. Rather, they haven't because they know enough about so many things to know that it is impossible. Flywheel Energy Storage is an example of a machine that would work best if perpetual, and scientists are trying to make it better all the time.

@taboosaboo 3 жыл бұрын

Somebody call the patent office I invented perpetual motion it's called The River.

@electrolyticmaster8396 6 жыл бұрын

When I was in high school, I was convinced I could build a perpetual energy system using a motor / generator. At the time, I didn't realize that the laws of physics were against me.

@magosexploratoradeon6409 5 жыл бұрын

Ah if only our creativity follows the universal laws.

@imcintyre01 6 жыл бұрын

Short answer no. Friction and gravity

@handledandle332 7 жыл бұрын

Two portals, water and a watermill. Put portals over and under the watermill, then put some water in the portal. Free energy, we just need to invent portals first. Not sure if it would work or not, it's just a theory.

@caydjj 7 жыл бұрын

Joona Illman if we do ever create such a portal, the energy required to move the object vertically this amount would have to be greater than the increase in potential energy as it must be conserved, such that it would take more energy to lift the water than you are getting out of it

@antman674 7 жыл бұрын

Sure, that would work as an infinite energy source. Which is exactly why portals - or wormholes - would take an infinite amount of energy to create in the first place! 😂

@isaacbushnell2663 7 жыл бұрын

what'll power the portals?! we're all doomed!

@rohanmenon1493 7 жыл бұрын

Joona Illman nice idea but i m sure portals will never last forever....

@nexus1g 7 жыл бұрын

The question is if the energy required to maintain the portals would require less power than the turbine can produce.

@ghanjahman 7 ай бұрын

Yall are missing the whole point of attempting to create such a device…sustainability. I think we should start using relevant terminology to refocus our efforts on what really matters instead of playing semantics. The reality is that there are numerous ways to create and use sustainable energy that can be relatively cost free.

@Sh0cKwavE__ 7 жыл бұрын

Not have to burn fossil fuels anymore? Nuclear energy bro

@CaptainGrief66 7 жыл бұрын

` shockwaveBJ Plutonium and Uranium still will run out eventually, plus it is toxic for the ambient.

@Sh0cKwavE__ 7 жыл бұрын

very small waste, maybe we can use thorium later on, and all we really need to do is make energy until we can get nuclear fusion

@supahx1421 7 жыл бұрын

Thorium ftw

@peterwright8105 6 жыл бұрын

Nuclear energy is is like fossil fuels barbaric and unnessessary.

@therealzilch 8 жыл бұрын

Of course perpetual motion machines are possible. I saw it on youtube, so it must be true.

@Kneedragon1962 8 жыл бұрын

It was the never ending search of the alchemists, to transmute lead into gold. These days, that can actually be done, with a particle accelerator. But it is not worth the effort. The cost of making one gram of gold that way is many hundreds of grams worth. It is a lot cheaper and easier to just go and mine gold, or buy it. But the efforts of the alchemists were not wasted. A lot of the knowledge that led to modern chemistry came from the attempts of the alchemists. Perpetual motion is snake oil, that's true. But wouldn't it be lovely to get it to work? We build and develop machines, to reduce labour. Wouldn't it be lovely to build one that made all future labour redundant?

@Kneedragon1962 8 жыл бұрын

+Kneedragon1962 Another thought, from the beginning of time, men dreamed of flying like the birds. But up until December 17 1903 everybody KNEW that was impossible, and any effort expended on it was fantasy. Snake oil, a waste of time and money and resources.

@asterisqueetperil2149 8 жыл бұрын

+Kneedragon1962 but violation of the conservation of energy is of another level. Flying was possible in theory but judged impossible technically. Here violation of the conservation of energy implies that the laws of physics change with time, which hasn't been observed yet (and physicists are testing it actually). Check Noether's theorem for more informations.

@Kneedragon1962 8 жыл бұрын

Astérisque Etpéril Moot distinction, I think. Very few people said it could be done and it was only a question of time, and quite a few very learned men said for 76 different reasons it was impossible, and the Wright Brothers (and all the other ning-nongs trying to break the laws of physics, and there was quite a group of them) were either retarded or at best, quite misguided.

@asterisqueetperil2149 8 жыл бұрын

I think the distinction is important. Newton's laws don't forbid to fly, and the possibility of it is obvious since we see birds flying every day. You seem to know more than me about this period, so what kind of "impossibilities" were told at the time ? I guess this was about the weight/resistance of the material and the power of engines, so technical difficulties not theoretical impossibilities. Here I recall that violation of the conservation of energy => variation of the laws of physics by translation in time, which as never been observed despite all the effort put into it.

@Kneedragon1962 8 жыл бұрын

Astérisque Etpéril (Chuckle) I would not say I know more about the period, I am a child of 62 as my tag suggests, but I do know a little bit about aviation. Before I discovered motorbikes or girls or good scotch, I became absolutely sold to the idea of flight, at about 6 years old. I learned to read on flying history and textbooks. Major problems with the other efforts, came from a variety of things. Either the structure was simply not able to hold the thing together, or the power source had not enough power, or (many cases) the power source was 10 times too heavy. The other big problem was most of them had a concept like a boat. The first thing they were trying to do, was just get it to float. The idea of being able to handle it and tack, that was seen as a lesser problem. So the damn things crashed. The Wright Brothers were bicycle makers, and instinctively saw the problem as a 3 dimensional extension of riding a push-bike. Which is almost exactly right! Others had fairly correct ideas about flight, but they did not get how important control is, or how you exercise it - the Wrights did. Exactly what the objections were, I could not quote them to you, but the general feeling was that it contradicted 77 different rules of physics and common sense and anybody who contemplated it was bound to end up in a smoking heap on the ground. And observation did tend to bare that out. There were NUMEROUS people and groups attempting it, from about 1896 onward, but almost all of them ended up in a heap. Otto Linthall got it to work, (in Germany) - invented what we today would call a hang glider. It was controlled by shifting body weight, and it was un-powered, and eventually he did crash it and die of his injuries. The Wrights did learn a lot from Linthall. He was not right about everything, but he wrote quite a bit, and it was more right than wrong.

@askingwhyisfree7436 3 жыл бұрын

Apply this to the universe. Planets go round and round and if it follows this law, it has to stop at one point. This concludes that an energy outside of this mechanism is required. INTERESTING....

@joshhayl7459 5 жыл бұрын

🔵 Every-thing came from some-thing, therefore nothing can become no-thing, everything MUST become something.

@joshhayl7459 5 жыл бұрын

To: Ian Duke, 🔵 What part of "Everything" did you not understand?!.....

@benaressacred4774 5 жыл бұрын

If you give a non existence a name 'Nothing' it is no longer a non existence. Ergo there is no such thing as nothing.

@benaressacred4774 5 жыл бұрын

Exactly. Nothing cannot have a name.

@snoglydox 4 жыл бұрын

Corporations have been getting something for nothing since the beginning of, well, corporations; it's called..."e-x-p-l-o-i-t-a-t-i-o-n."

@TexasHoosier3118 5 жыл бұрын

Many people have developed perpetual motion machines, but they were bought out by the oil companies or killed , since such an invention would shift the balance of power and wealth. (sarcasm)

@gregheckert1396 5 жыл бұрын

Sarcasm? It's real. There's a few inventors that have been missing for decades! If the one I saw long ago worked like he said (demonstrated prototype model) the oil, electric power and the government would fold! They can not allow a device that can reproduce energy without the use of a fuel , otherwise hundreds of thousands of jobs would be obsolete over night! A device that can be made to fit a blender or coffee maker without plugging it in is revolutionary and would change the entire world. Imagine never needing to plug in a appliance, never need gas or diesel fuel to power ANYTHING again! How do you think the government would survive? They wouldn't, they would fold just like the oil companies and power companies. It would change the world and how we live. They don't want that, the government wants to control us, nothing more.

@Leggir 5 жыл бұрын

Along with the Oil companies buying and burying the Special GM that on a carburettor got more than 100 mpg.

@Leggir 5 жыл бұрын

@@gregheckert1396 😂 You're a card, Hahaha.

@havcola6983 5 жыл бұрын

@@gregheckert1396 So, in this hypothetical tin foil hat scenario, how do governments of other nations fit in? Do all the world's governments just have a gentleman's agreement to suppress this enormous leap in physics and energy production and not use it to gain an advantage over each other, and also trust each other to follow the rules? That sounds like a very peaceful and noncompetitive world.

@magosexploratoradeon6409 5 жыл бұрын

I knew it, those cannot be trusted (lmao nice joke.)

@lyndoneaton5391 2 жыл бұрын

The concept of improving things and inventing something better doesn't have to be called perpetual motion. Making something more efficient is a noble thing to do and shouldn't be discouraged. The invention of ultralight aircraft of many types was done after airplanes were invented, and they work quite nicely. But 100 years ago they would have been considered faulty designs that would never work. In the same way devices can be developed that improve their efficiency. If inventors listened to the engineers of the day there would not have been cars or light bulbs.

@SenpaiSan 5 жыл бұрын

The way of explaination is very detailed..it gave me a lot of knowledge

@tracyjamestavares3255 5 жыл бұрын

I got a endless motion thingy , ya got to meet my grandson . Good Vid. , Demo. an Info . I forgot that stuff

@redstoneclasher2675 3 жыл бұрын

When I was a boy, I created my own without the idea that it was actually impossible.. I messed up🤦‍♂️

@marcisgulbis9310 3 жыл бұрын

@redstoneclasher2675 3 жыл бұрын

@@marcisgulbis9310 oh! I'm so glad that someone replied from my comment! It seems that what you are saying are legit. I will study what you gave to me after my exams. I am quite interested with that topic. Anyway, Thank you for that!! 💯

@michaeld4861 3 жыл бұрын

@@redstoneclasher2675 he's a troll. Don't forget that his applications are impossible without a working flux capacitor and a sizable rotary girder. lol

@sanju7wizzboy335 3 жыл бұрын

Hey....if perpetual motion is impossible... then how did you made that wheel with coins at the beginning which you showed...and if it's not perpetual motion and what is it!?