Are The British Royal Family Illegitimate? | Britain's Real Monarch | Real Royalty

[@pamanthanos9742]

so if he wants his crown back he needs allies and troops and maybe a dragon

[@noritakataka1148]

No u stupid thanos he need jokowi help

[@IrvinTime1989]

Dragons are ALWAYS a must!! (EDIT: holy shit! Thanks for almost 100 likes!)

[@brontewcat]

Actually it was Henry VII who had the dragon. The dragon was a Welsh symbol, and was used by Henry on his banner at the Battle of Bosworth by which he claimed the throne by conquest.

[@annemariescenna889]

Paman Thanos omo

[@annemariescenna889]

Pop ppp

[@tanveechoudhary1838]

You know a man has had a good life when he doesn't regret not being the king at all.

[@teresabelshaw6694]

why is he just stepping up now then how did he not do it years ago.

[@panismith1544]

Not knowing what you ever had..or what you really are.. Of course you'll say that..

[@pamelawherey4583]

He is the rightful king though. The crown belongs to him. A mistake was made and it needs to be corrected.

[@leannawoolbright9359]

Elvis

[@lisaellis2593]

Yes.

[@yahwehsfirstfruitscremedel6816]

You can strip a man from his title, but you can't strip him of his real value. A man of great integrity, will never be forgotten

[@maureenjamieson6223]

Shame on you timeline. Way to undermine your Royal family. I am disgusted. I guess you want to get rid of the family by bringing up something which happened 500 yrs ago. I am embarrassed for you..

[@edwinrodrigues9747]

@@maureenjamieson6223 THE QUEEN IS A THIEF , SHE IS SURVIVING ON THE ROBBED WEALTH OF THE WORLD.

[@berrymanmontgomery7875]

The only thing that matters in life is have you been "born-again" KJV John 3:7.

[@elizabethbrown4972]

@@berrymanmontgomery7875 Yes indeed. I am thank God.

[@yahwehsfirstfruitscremedel6816]

@@berrymanmontgomery7875 👍 True integrity is "No doubt" based on someone having a "Holy" mindset, (Sanctified and set apart).

[@Taina2024]

I've thoroughly enjoyed watching this! Thank you for posting it!

[@Wanker59]

The bloke won. Grew up and stayed normal in Australia. Definitely a win

[@theodoravonwied5441]

But still not the legitimate heir. Henry VII acquired his claim to the throne not by marriage with Edward IV's daughter, but through his own mother's Beaufort/Lancaster/Plantagenet blood. And although the Beauforts had been "barred" from succession almost a century earlier, Henry VII's claim via that exact line was accepted by parliament in 1485. And that is what counts.

[@gazza2933]

@@theodoravonwied5441 It also 'counts' to keep your head on your shoulders!

[@cyrussabaee7907]

@@gazza2933 good one

[@gazza2933]

@@cyrussabaee7907 Parliament would have been made up of mostly barons at that time. Definitely not your local MP. 👍🏻

[@HoboRoadshow7]

>normal >Australia Lol no

[@Onotail]

Anyone can be Monarch. You just have to have an army and take the Crown. History has proven that many times over.

[@shelleyphilcox4743]

@O and in a constitutional monarchy to have the backing of the majority of people and if you behave like a tyrranical despot they may well dethrone you (and decapitate you) and install someone else as monarch or despatch having a monarch altogether!

[@mattematsson554]

Hear, hear.

[@Spark_Iskra_z_Polski]

Let us help the Ausie overthrow the British monarchs, for historic justice' sake😀

[@Onotail]

@@Spark_Iskra_z_Polski I think the Aussies need to overthrow the Lefties first.

[@melissawells1099]

Exactly

[@minervaville]

He has the royal blood but doesn't regret not having to participate inside the monarchy life. Such a kind soul :)

[@molliecurry4212]

He would be killed if he threw a fit that made headlines

[@ForteExpresso]

He is being mature and smart. Stupid old kings would raise army and waste lives,money, energy etc for the Goddamn RIGHT!!

[@islamicschoolofmemestudies]

Considering how violent and volatile the Royal family's relationship today...I'm not surprised with that wise decision.

[@norahbradley5138]

Who’d want to. He’s smart.

[@janicejohnson1442]

Can someone explain to me why their blood is so Royal? And why the peasants feel the need to give all their money to them while they go hungry and freeze to death?

[@k.h.7575]

The thing is, the english "Royal family" knows this. Blood lines, family heritage is their thing. And we can count on there are absolutely no details missed when it comes to that.... They actually might be afraid the public finding out. And to me, it shows how ridiculous the whole "royal thing" is really... Owing my respect as a human being, (also behind closed doors) is what is counting for me. Having lots of money, having no empathy, and arrogance sitting on a high throne certainly doesn't owe my respect, quite the opposite.... This was interesting. Thank you 🙏

[@aliceinwavyland]

No empathy? You clearly know nothing about the royal family 😅

[@milliesecond102]

​@@aliceinwavyland apparently, you have idolized the idea of monarchy but the only person with a heart and soul for humanity was Diana.😢

[@seraphimequilibriumhealing4925]

@@aliceinwavylandyou will find out soon the true facts of the lizard family 🤮

[@aliceinwavyland]

@@milliesecond102 We know where your bias lies then

[@seraphinaangel9068]

@@aliceinwavyland You only have to look back in history and know the real royal family and how they got where they are today. Empathy is not a word to be used for the royal family

[@SKS2011SC]

"King" Michael and his family line dodged a bullet if you ask me. Talk about money and power all you want, but I'd take a close-knit, loving family and the respect and friendship of my community over an immensely distant and dysfunctional family and the "privilege" of having every detail of my life ordered and critiqued by other people.

[@rochelleesser7961]

AMEN!!!

[@saucespicy5683]

that's the way we see it as outsiders, they live in a different bubble where all these thoughts of ours are irrelevant in a way

[@katewizer2736]

@@saucespicy5683 Well, with my "outside view" I am thankful that my bloodline isn't tainted with any "royalty"!.!.!

[@TRINITY8400]

I COMPLETELY DISAGREE. HE NEEDS TO RESCUE BRITAIN AND AUSTRALIA FROM THE PRESENT TYRANNY

[@SKS2011SC]

@@TRINITY8400 Sadly, I heard that King Michael passed in 2012. So he's not available for regime makeovers :(

[@samuel21243]

The royal charisma about him is unmistakeable.He certainly knows his roots yet he chose to live a normal but satisfying life with respectable achievements and wise humility.God bless his family and his generations to come with Kingly favor and success🙏🏻

[@mariaterry7672]

God Bless Your Entire Family.😁❤

[@Otmjv]

Simp

[@debbee5057]

Perfectly said ❤

[@Rowlph8888]

The Windsors, or should I say Saxo-Coburg have 0 charisma, have you listened too William, Harry, Charles or Andrew. Literally 0! But maybe that's the point, they aren't Royal. I guess

[@staciehaneline9533]

Amen 🙏💞

[@lisaellis2593]

What a jolly man, he knows of his family trees, yet he is not affected by it, Good man!

[@therobinmasterstheory1636]

agree.... good man

[@thegreypath1777]

Michael Hastings passed in 2012. However, Michael was survived by his eldest son Simon Abney Hastings.

[@alanlawton1959]

Interesting that Simon Michael Abney-Hastings, 15th Earl of Loudoun was chosen to carry one of the gold spurs of the royal regalia, emblems of knighthood and chivalry to be presented to the king at the 2023 Coronation. The only Australian to have an Official role for the Coronation.

[@tonyaosier624]

They know the true history. As long the Hasting don't come for them then the so called royals play nice.

[@lizzy66125]

it says on Wikipedia that he aknowledged his right to the throne.

[@iTammy]

Wikipedia is proven not to be trust!

[@NoeletteMason-rn3wy]

He's not Australian though.

[@xtyna100]

Queen Victoria being the grandmother of Europe and descendant of Edward IV (a bastard) makes all of Europe Royalty Ilegitimate

[@diosaputra5030]

So they're just normal people who lucky crowned

[@nicoletheresa6654]

And also the fact that her offsprings caused so much havoc in the 20th century, that we are still cleaning up after them.

[@essencelin914]

@@diosaputra5030 lucky people to inherit titles and land. Land owners basically. Nothing special

[@ageofechochambers9469]

Dont worry there is plenty of bastardy going on in the royals and nobility even without Victoria

[@edithprochaska5592]

And the anglican church too

[@anyastar8]

He looks like he could be a good King. A lovable King

[@lorrainenicoletti6232]

He sure isn’t ARROGANT : BREATH OF FRESH AIR

[@acovenofmany333]

Agreed! Lovely man. However had he grown up a ‘royal’, he may not have become the man he is.

[@markallen381]

Could you knight me sire? I don't see why not!

[@WilliamJoelCarpenter]

Halo Angel 😇 ANGEL THAT lAM1/2 and Human RHNULL Blood No Mal Y so I am William Joel Or Billjening King JO EL Jose or Elite ten one hosannas most highest malco this is Malachi the righteous preacher man son OF GOD FREE WILL ® FATHER WORD OF GOD HAYOKA THEE RAIN MAN WORD OF GOD HAYOKA THEE WORD OF GOD 🙏 I am William Joel Carpenter my AKA Gattey GREAT grandson AND QUIT MINDING MINE ANGEL THAT MIKE'S LOVE out of nothing at all FINDING OUT EVERYTHING YOUR Plot BLACK PANTHER THEE WORD OF GOD HAYOKA THEE RAIN MAN IAM ASKING AS KING stop all the b******* thanks and peace out ADEMBILLYCARPENTER

[@RummerChan]

I gotta say, if it's between Charles and a guy with lawn gnomes in his yard.... I'm standing with the lawn gnome man. XD

[@RummerChan]

@mishrooms actually, I don't like him(Charles) because he is quite eccentric and doesn't seem to understand how the real world works. But think what you want, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. :)

[@hanjizoe1]

@@RummerChan All Hail The Lawn Gnome Man

[@fatimafahad549]

Hhhhhh u made me laugh

[@mrsinnerman-gamer2286]

@mishrooms but what they did to lady di was bad tho

[@mrsinnerman-gamer2286]

Doesnt Tony Robinson play daddy in man down

[@roseyk7677]

Reading Shakespeare and then stating "that's pretty clear isn't it" got me 😂😂😂😂😂

[@daisymiano925]

@rosey.... Picked up in that too😅

[@DerGlaetze]

Now that’s what a real king should look like, handsome, charming and warm hearted, with humility as well. He was the real king.

[@teresabelshaw6694]

prove it.

[@Danielle-wo6vn]

Looks more normal than any of the current royals.

[@jesslovesponies]

Absolutely! Handsome,charming and wearing flip flops 😆👑👑👑

[@jodieHaby]

Long live King Michael and his Gorgeous bloodline.

[@marylouleeman]

APPARENT royal blood

[@sophieamat9467]

I love what's said ... "The nature of history itself. It's fragile. It's accidental. ... some people rise up and others are cast down below ... we tend to think of the monarchy as a solid institution ... whereas in fact wealth, privilege and power and status just hang by a thread. There's no such thing as the divine right of kings". ... This beautifully sums up what I take away from this documentary. There's NO such thing as the divine right of kings (monarch).

[@misty5805]

But they are still under the highest King

[@Texasjim2007]

The fact that the family lines of human beings are subject to accidents of fate or whatever other euphemisms one wishes to use for the Will of God really has nothing to do with the monarchist idea of the Divine Right of Kings that I can see. After all what sort of Divine Right did all the Saxon and Norman monarchs have to ownership of Britain to begin with? As Napoleon once said God is on the side the largest armies. That's also a bit of a massive oversimplification since natural disasters such as plagues, meteor collisions, volcanic eruptions or other "Acts of God" have also historically influenced property distribution but no more than the Socialist notion that all of us are equally entitled to an equal share in all the property in the world which is something that has never existed in actual practice anywhere.

[@Texasjim2007]

​@Anon but not q Basically that traditional legal principles such as hereditary property rights do not cease to exist regardless of the legitimacy of the Tudors or not. Legal traditions exist because it benefits us to have commonly accepted principles of law to refer to not because any of us are under any delusion that those principles have never been corrupted in practice by shady lawyers or dishonest judges and politicians. :)

[@devesongs]

the same goes for Zionistic beliefs over Palestine

[@bettyvanderhooven-schmaasc4235]

@@misty5805 THEY wrote your bible.

[@surcettinr2600]

He had a very kingly presence about him...a noble yet affable humility

[@oliviacadena2036]

I thought so too! 😮

[@thegreypath1777]

Michael has passed (2012). However, Michael was survived by his eldest son Simon Abney Hastings.* *See Wikipedia, Simon Abney Hastings.,

[@aprilb5451]

The real family is so sweet. They understand what it is to not have a silver spoon in their mouth all the time. It offeres so much to respect.

[@wildzac]

I think Michael, looks, speaks, thinks, and acts very well for a King!

[@lorrainenicoletti6232]

agreed

[@hassandk8430]

Fully agree!

[@kalesisheehy432]

Another Woke Cancelled Culture! Who cares???? These people would make up anything goes.

[@evahausberger6173]

And properly murdered his brothers sons. A truly good man. Lol.

[@GR3EYFAC3S]

I agree the skipper king.

[@crisfrieboes4066]

Not the first illegitimate monarch, and probably not the last.

[@cekoforbidden9317]

@belenda gramacki *reality: fck off, i got another idea*

[@anjsmith8459]

I am 0 rhesus neg, blue blood. All my family are rhesus - Surely i fit in there somewhere. 😂😂

[@lisamua5325]

@@anjsmith8459 m

[@annabellaboyer643]

Thanks Cris Frieboes.

[@dutchvanderlinde8900]

It will be the last. The monarchy serves basically no purpose anymore. There's really no reason to usurp the throne anymore.

[@DD-np4bb]

How humble and kind he is and his daughters beautiful. Dear Michael and family, Sir, it is indeed an honor to know you and your family. With lot's of love and prayers from Bhutan.

[@Jules-fx2sc]

Very interesting. Like Michael, I am a working class republican. I found a common ancestor in my mother's and fathers ancestry, and it is King Edward IV. One through a legitimate line, and the other through an illegitimate son Arthur Waite. This documentary has made the rest of my ancestry research very complicated now.

[@janetwailes4597]

Ooooh ..... would you be able to keep us updated on that?

[@iTammy]

That’s awesome! My bloodline tells me the same! With that said; we’re really all related!

[@Glenn-em3hv]

I damn sure wouldn't be proud of it and I'd never mention it!!!

[@chironapolonio]

Indeed fascinating but the point is rather moot. The British "line of succession" is riddled with illigitimacies, regicide, interruptions and influxes of foreign dynasties.

[@lisetteeliseparis7070]

Exactly.

[@brontewcat]

Moot because Parliament not a person’s heritage decides who is monarch. It has been thus since at least 1485 - Henry VII’s time.

[@essex1st]

Yes our Queens family heretage comes from Germany and her husband from Greece

[@brontewcat]

pat gladwell Some of the Queen’s middle distant heritage is German. The most recent of her ancestors, who were born in Germany, were 2 of 8 her great parents, Queen Mary’s parents. They were both born in Germany in the 1860s. But even that is not clear cut as Queen Mary’s grandmother and great grandmother were born in England being Queen Victoria and one of her daughters. Otherwise you have go back another generation to find more German ancestry to Prince Albert. The Hanoverian dynasty derived its claim to the throne from George I’s grandmother Elizabeth, daughter of James VI of Scotland I of England (In other words his British heritage was much closer to him than the Queen’s German heritage). All royal families until the twentieth century tended to have foreign spouses. By emphasising the foreign heritage and not the British is artificial. The present Queen has comparatively little non British blood, particularly when compared to virtually all her predecessors back to Elizabeth I. Elizabeth I and Edward VI are almost unique in the British monarchy after William the Conqueror in that they had very little non British blood

[@peterpluim7912]

Keeps the bloodline healthy. :)

[@stanleyhood4343]

Maybe God is protecting this man & his family from a humongous mess. See what is going among the Royals in Britain now?

[@maryfiaola3686]

hahaha could well be thats the case

[@nayurimonios4814]

Honestly I think he had a better life just being normal and actually being able to live....being that I’m seeing this in 2020, I pray that his family is safe from the fires as well as everyone else

[@diy_nailsby_heidi_r3889]

Amen. May God be merciful.

[@prettygirlie1266]

He was saved by God from the illuminati

[@reflexionesdelabiblia6711]

@@prettygirlie1266 There have been Kings brought to God by God Himself. Things may have been much more moral had they stayed on. But Satan had to set himself up ...

[@brontewcat]

Although the fires have been the worst we have ever seen most of the country has not been burnt. I think where this family lives is on the plains. The fires have been concentrated on coastal areas and in hill and mountainous country. We Australians appreciate the love and concern the international community has shown. However, I think we also need to let everyone know the majority of the country has not been burnt. North Queensland, where the Great Barrier Reef is located, is unaffected. One of the big problems that is now stemming from the fires is that many tourists are cancelling holidays or not coming even to places such as the northern, western and central parts of Australia have not really been affected.

[@christieatuh]

Thank God for the beautiful life he has

[@katiequimby5576]

Wonderful program professionally filmed, host has a warm way of connecting to people, inclusive even. The story of the Australian King of England….fascinating and heartwarming. ❤

[@randyandbethbiggs410]

Bless him in his endeavors. Finding food for benefit of everyone to ensure there is no starvation is much more practical and noble than anything I can think of.

[@cherylsindoni7658]

Exactly!!

[@reneemoreno8030]

True Royal family is beautiful and filled with love and humility. Long live King Michael !

[@xrayban2]

That's why I felt it was kind of cruel to disturb them with that fairy tale.

[@robalexander8065]

He died in 2012.

[@mariadasilva863]

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍I totally agree with your comment

[@mariadasilva863]

@@xrayban2 not fairly tale it’s the truth

[@PrinceAlhorian]

Long Live King Micheal the First!

[@jayb8881]

I'm not British, but this was EXTREMELY interesting! Thank you so much for doing all the research and going through all the traveling and trouble to make this BRILLIANT video!

[@electricdreams9446]

Why would you have to be British to enjoy this?

[@jayb8881]

@@electricdreams9446 Oh please, snowflake! 🙄

[@electricdreams9446]

@@jayb8881 huh.....

[@jayb8881]

@@electricdreams9446 Exactly!

[@dayhill1616]

@@jayb8881 Brilliant! 😂😆😝

[@Taina2024]

The problem is that you cant change one element from history, and then leave the other elements the same. Perhaps if the first event happened, the others would've been different and there would be different people on the throne today.

[@jamesthornton9399]

I am at a loss to see how little effect the different outcome would be. Especially That the monarchy was constituted monarchy.

[@anythingbut...]

​​​​​@@jamesthornton9399the difference would certainly be different if the correct lineage was preserved at the source of the mishap. The rightful descendants would not be that free to marry whoever they want and they would have had more money that would open them to different opportunities and social circles to mingle and pair up with. The alternative royals that are living today would not have been born and most likely would not have been living in Australia, there would be different lineage entirely in the UK. Moreover, the UK probably would still be catholic as the mishap was before Henry VIII. Possibly there would be enough royal descendants in England that James VI from Scotland would not end up being king James I of England and Ireland as well, Scotland might have still be independent country. There would be different political tensions that would perhaps not lead to Cromwell dissolving monarchy in 1649 and then creation of constitutional monarchy might well not have happened (it started in 1688). In fact who knows, with the anti monarchy movements in Europe in the early XX century the British Royal Family might have been dissolved completely with revolution the same as in other countries if it still held more power at that point. I think it only survived so long as it was not perceived as powerful, the UK might have had a president today instead, but we would never know that. Perhaps the handsome archer has actually saved the RF after all, as it is still going strong today despite the political storms around them.

[@MsMickey541]

He did say that.

[@dcsco]

This is just one of the many huge problems with all monarchies, and why they should be replaced or ignored.

[@susancronin5589]

Watch out buddy, Camilla will be trying to get a date with you.....😂

[@southerngirlsrock2799]

Lol

[@lillyc6527]

Camila has ended up with a commoner it suits her right!

[@CoffeeLover-mz7bk]

YES!

[@laurahammond4698]

Ewww!

[@laurahammond4698]

😂🤣😂🤣

[@maritkaa007]

He looks like a King :) he is charming, well-mannered, chilled, friendly, seems very decent. Real monarch!

[@PrinceAlhorian]

A man who who does not seek the pleasures of power, who accept and understand the privileges and freedoms of a simple life, that man is a man who I can call king.

[@kristin9893]

Kinda surprised you’re still alive after this 🤘🏻 Keep on keepin’ on!! ❤

[@yaadapaah887]

😂

[@Glenn-em3hv]

Yes with the pure evil that's on the throne now it's unbelievable that he's still alive!!! They definitely murdered Diana and don't have any problems with assassination!!!

[@Hs000_00]

OMG! This video needs to be shared around the world! The REAL King Michael looks so kind. The interviewer is so lucky to have met the rightful King. The daughters joked and laughed because they are so used to their happy carefree lives down under. A blessed family. But it makes me sad to know that the REAL King was not on the throne

[@shariedeal930]

I don't know that he's the real King there are several of us that stem from the actual royal family Crown in the beginning of time the McNichols family is supposedly the rightful royal family Sophie of Hanover was the last legitimate Royal Queen that takes it in a whole different direction of which my cousins are talking about right now because they're direct ancestors so we've got some problems and we're trying to figure out who can help us figure out the real thing anybody got a law degree

[@shirell68]

The royal family will never take a. DNA test just dig up king Richard and test his blood with king Charles

[@B_Bodziak]

@@shariedeal930 You'll need someone with more than a UK law degree. You'll need a couple of British historians, genealogists and access to royal records. Then, you'll need at minimum, a British Lord or higher, to confirm every finding, and a few advocates in Parliment. Best of Luck, but it will likely remain a great story to pass to your posterity.

[@joannemcardle1848]

This kind of thing happened at the time, not just to the British monarchy. Or someone warred against the King/Queen, overthrew them, and took the throne.

[@tokkieandrews9988]

I'm sure that the real Monarchy would not be mixed up in this NWO rubbish like these lot is ,a question I would like ask ,the boy who escaped from the the window of the palace I wonder why.?

[@DesertRockfall]

We get all the way through to the end to find out that the true King of England lives a quiet life in Australia, looks like the Skipper from Gilligan's Island, and is one hell of a nice guy!

[@ozzi394]

Very true, that is why I can't comprehend that why is anyone rubishing Harry and Megan. They are a married couple whom want to live their life a way they like, no one's buzyness, only the press wouldn't know what to talk about without hating someone, specially the English press, they are the most descipable press on Earth, hardly ever!!! tell the truth, very sad that some people believe them.

[@johnwalters5131]

Tony Robbo's Jewish . Most Jewish media pundits hate Monarchies bcs of past Regal pogroms they suffered . Why he accepted a Knighthood seems treacherous hypocrisy !

[@sumanamjs]

Australia is a member of the Commonwealth. Now, you even have the King! And he ain’t goin’ nowhere✌️

[@DesertRockfall]

@@sumanamjs I don't blame him! Ya know, that whole show would never had worked if they had wound up with a total douche-bag at the end. This humble and hard working man and his family made it all worth the watch.

[@Hfh415]

😂😂😂🍾 cheers

[@NGMountains]

You can just look and listen to this man and you know. He's a true King.

[@marcocognome1835]

Indeed, I do think than evry one is Happy were he Is the Queen on the Trone for the nex 300 years, Charles wating, and William losing that few hairs than he have left, and this guy's famaly in Australia. Despait evry thing, this don't make the last 500 years of British history invalid and make the great actions of sovrans like Elizabeth I, Victoria I, Eduard VII, George V, George VI and Elizabeth II invalid as well, the guided the nation in pece and in war in a ever chaneging world. They maby weren't king in their boold but their actions are definatly the actions of a king/Queen. And I'm sure than most of US common People woud not be able to do the same

[@meenug5938]

Completely agree. He wants a republic rather than a monarchy... Salute you sir.. what Happy real people they are... Stay blessed..

[@krisb3939]

No Jesus is the true King

[@lynderherberts2828]

I love Tony and all of his research documentaries. He is so good.

[@Roses-lilac]

I would love to see the results of a DNA test.

[@misplacedsouthern1236]

On everyone. Can you imagine? One giant Soap Opera! 🇺🇸

[@SPÖKE-SWE]

Never going to happen in this matter.

[@Handlemandle-o5z]

The current queen and the royal family didnt allow it. For… obvious reasons 😂

[@andrealuisecandido1154]

​@@misplacedsouthern1236 who are you?

[@andrealuisecandido1154]

our DNA wasnT Taken official which only would counT if A Judge of A CouRT House would give A Order

[@pamelaklemp5615]

Fascinating and beautifully well researched. I had read of this decades ago while studying Royal History regarding the Hastings Lineages. Studying Royal History was a favorite hobby of mine for many years. My own husband is a researcher and Predictive Modeler of Neural Net Models. His Undergraduate degree is in History. His Masters Degree is in Social Science. Research was a perfect and passionate career choice for him. We have oftentimes said that good, trustworthy imperial data tells the real stories through its PESKY LITTLE FACTS and, oftentimes, not simply through the LARGELY KNOWN FACTS. Certainly that wisdom has been showcased by you and your passionate love of research. BRAVO GOOD to you 👏 👍. I certainly respect your devoted work.

[@fairchild1737]

My great, great grandmother Mary Brown born 1705 leads to Royalty. I traced my ancestry to the Hastings.

[@staciehaneline9533]

​@@fairchild1737Very cool!! 💞

[@monstertoy4620]

I love how Michael whips out his copy of the family tree and cross references everything

[@AnnaMaledonPictureBookAuthor]

Yes! Probably the funniest part. And his tree looks way nicer.

[@thedigitaljedi3243]

I've watched this numerous times and wondered about Mr. Hastings family. I truly hope all of them are happy and well. A very warm and kind man that lived an ordinary life in Australia with his children and grandchildren. No regrets about not being involved with the monarchy. His family was his wealth. Looking at this part of his life can make one self reflect what's really important.

[@keribert880]

The Act of Settlement, saying that the future monarch has to be a legal child, is from 1701. Means, these rules did not apply in the time of Edward yet.

[@Red1Green2Blue3]

Also laws don't really matter for a feudal system. Might makes right. Or are we now going to say William the Conqueror isn't a legitimate English king lol.

[@red.aries1444]

Why should there be The Act of Settlement? If Edward IV was illegitimate, then there wouldn't be a Henry VIII who wanted to be divorced by the catholic church from his first wife Catherine of Aragon, which was denied by the pope. That was the reason why Henry VIII made his own church. Maybe the Kings of England would still be catholic... There would be another history. On the other hand several other countries of northern Europe had seperated from the catholic church. But the history would defiantly different. If the Pole/Hastings family would have inherited the crown, they would have married other partners. Princesses from other countries for example. And princesses from the "Hastings" royal family would have married foreign princes. No one could tell if there would have been a war about religion in England. The british parliament enacted The Act of Settlement because they wanted to exclude catholic descendant of Elisabeth Stuart, but with the alternative line of succession maybe no Britain would exist, if the crown of England and Scotland never merged together. Actually it doesn't matter. The father of Edward IV never disputed, that the fourth child of his wife wasn't his. He had 13 children overall with her. I don't think he would have so much children with her, if he would have thought she betrayed him. And he couldn't be so stupid that he couldn't count the time how long a pregnancy take...

[@theodoravonwied5441]

@@red.aries1444 Henry VIII's claim to the throne did not depend on Edward IV. His father, Henry VII, did explicitly claim the throne through his mother's Beaufort ancestry. And although this family had been blocked from succession a century earliert, parliament accepted this exact claim by Henry VII in 1485. So he was crowned king BEFORE he married Elizabeth of York, Edward IV's daughter. And one more thing. If Edward IV had not claimed to be king, then the Lancaster main line would possibly not had died off during the Wars of the Roses. Edward's brother George, the duke of Clarence, would have been too weak to claim the throne. So Henry VI's son, prince Edward of Wales, would have become king somewhere around 1480 after his father's natural death (not murdered in 1471 by Yorkists). So the house of Lancaster would have persisted and we would see a completely different royal line today.

[@namelia4439]

@@theodoravonwied5441 - Yes! So many alternate scenarios to ponder, the millions of ripple or butterfly effects over many centuries to imagine...what is, what could’ve been, and what never was...it’s so fascinating and fun to think about!!

[@red.aries1444]

​@@theodoravonwied5441 I think there is a misunderstanding. :-) I don't doubt Henry VII claim to the throne. Any other claim is irrelevant after the parliament acceptet Henry VII as the rightful king. After this it really doesn't matter even if he wasn't of royal blood. My point is, that the Act of Settlement says that everyone who isn't a descendant of Sophia of Hannover and who married a catholic is excluded. You can't argue with any later law to something which happenened before. There are to much possibilities over the years. And even if George Plantagenet had inherited the throne, then the following English kings and queens had definitely married other partners, so there never would have been a Michael Abney-Hastings. So nice interesting story, but any other person with more rights to the english throne than the actual queen Elizabeth is a completly stupid idea.

[@metamodernspiritualist6363]

Even so, still wouldn’t be correct because Henry VII did not claim his throne by lineage but instead through right of conquest

[@asherayeras9200]

Agree.

[@jackfitch8134]

And via lineage from his mother? Margaret Beaufort was a direct descendant of John of Gaunt

[@elouisegoodchild8077]

@@jackfitch8134 not a strong nor arguable legitimate line. His biggest claim is his marriage to Elizabeth of York

[@ruthjackson4342]

From Edward all Kings and Queens have no right to the throne and no illegitimate can claim the throne through right of conquest . Micheal Halletts family blood line proceeds Edward the so he is was the rightful heir . He had no interest in the throne and neither did his sons he died in 2012. We have known about him for years but it was all hushed up.

[@metamodernspiritualist6363]

@@ruthjackson4342 Right of conquest by it's very definition is right of ownership through force of arms - legitimacy or even having any relation to the previous royal bloodline is of absolutely no relation to this (whoever is capable of hosting an army, invading and conquering becomes king). Henry VII made it very clear that he was not co-ruling with his wife Elizabeth of York who was viewed by some factions as rightful heir to the throne, but instead he chose to marry her symbolically as a sign of peace. His claim to throne comes not through his bloodline, nor his wife's but instead in seizing government.

[@rj4313]

The Hastings are taking this lightly, but I guarantee the Tudor line takes this quite seriously.

[@Peter-ov6xh]

I guarantee you that they do not.

[@rj4313]

@@Peter-ov6xh maybe not anymore, the crown is basically finished after the queen dies, due to all the illegal, and pedophile activity in the family and friends. No sense on being serious about something that will basically be lowered to the status of glorified zoo attraction.

[@ThroatGoatNancy]

@@rj4313 hey now, that's mean to Zoos.

[@Hleagh]

@@rj4313 so insightful of you. Correct basically for the future.

[@kojo1ful]

Wow. It’s good to know the history Thank goodness for you and the availability of U tube

[@rasterboy995]

...this is only based on what happened FROM the point they started to look into the line of the monarchy... go further back and you'd have a different monarchy again.

[@urScorpioLady]

Raster Boy99 exactly! So, everything that happened, happened for a reason so I’d just call the royal family we know - the royal family !!

[@jasonrees6012]

I think that's his point . just saying..

[@scratchmanuttz2044]

true, and the right to rule of the current royals have already been established. i mean i dont know how things goes but things happens for a reason so we cannot discredit their right to rule nowadays.

[@mowtow90]

It is not important who is supposed to sit in the throne but who does. Power is not given - its taken. I will give you a good example , my country (Bulgaria) had a pig farmer as Tzar for 1 year , just because he managed to get the throne threw rebellion while the Tzar was at war. If you look at the English Monarchy its the same. For example Queen Mary (Henry 8th daughter) should of never been queen because her brother Edward 4th (king at the time) took away her and Elizabeth's titles and made them illegitimate. He left the crown to Lady Jane Gray. She was queen for few months until Mary took the throne via Rebellion. In fact the Tudors took the crown via Rebellion during the war of the Roses.

[@rasterboy995]

@@mowtow90 ...hmmm yes. This pretty much confirms the pointlessness of the Monrachy.

[@rvail136]

While the Hastings lost a throne, they gained humanity. Something Charles, et al, will never have.

[@cekoforbidden9317]

Nice claim but u looks stupid by your own statement

[@lori8553]

Richard Vail , well said Sir

[@TrevorHammonds]

@Bandit Ferret and how do you think you'd look if every moment of your life were broadcast for the entire world to see? I suggest you look in the mirror before you go casting aspersions.

[@cherfromtn8225]

I suspect the hundreds of people helped through the King's trust have a different opinion. I have read many accounts of King Charles. Your statement is quite simplistic. You are discounting years of charitable work and several major projects that have benefited the country. There are several books about the prince and the royal web site lists many good works. I assume you have discounted all of these. I think the King shows his humanity now more than ever. I think he has matured.

[@______________________6111]

I love this guy, what a family man! 5 kids, 5 grand kids - if that's not success I don't know what is - long live the TRUE King!

[@jamessmilus321]

There are lots of reasons why Edward IV was likely legitimate too. Also, NONE of this matters. Cause Edward took the throne by conquest.

[@marilynmalinsky7240]

Great research! Really enjoyed this. Thank you!!

[@AngelaTopping]

You can't take Shakespeare as history, he's not historically accurate, he's writing to entertain, plus he's a subject of the Tudors.

[@marcinkapinski9537]

It would be a very clever way to mock your supporters though.

[@jhunterb123]

this is bullshit look up the new king of england on youtube

[@AngelaTopping]

@@jhunterb123 I don't understand. btw I am a Shakespeare expert.

[@kevinlongman007]

Really? In Shakespeare's King Richard the III he was a hunchback and we were told that he probably made that up as he was a villan. However when they discovered Richard's skeleton a few years ago guess what...he was a hunchback!

[@AngelaTopping]

@@kevinlongman007 Yes, but it was greatly exaggerated by the Tudors. He had a slight scoliosis of the spine. Shakespeare's portrayal of him was probably based on a history written by Moreton, and copied out by Thomas More. They lived long after the events written about. There is plenty of evidence to say he was a good king. Shakespeare is not only writing to entertain, he has to keep his head on his shoulders in Tudor times when he lived.

[@sh.a.3333]

I really enjoyed this documentary! Thanks! I believe Michael has had a better and richer life than Britain's royals

[@NLR759]

That's correct. His children and grandchildren all talk to him, and are part of his life. Not something King Charles can boast about at all.

[@fhamidkhan]

Couldn’t agree more.

[@n23817]

Fascinating and intriguing revelation. Michael has a very noble demeanor and that certain confidence that comes with the royal legacy he was born into.

[@sophiachavez3377]

It amazes me that people do not understand that actions of the past cannot be judged according to to current standards which are ever changing.

[@berndejesus4656]

"All the kings started died like flies." Is so similar to "Now, the kings are dying like flies." By Tyrion Lannister

[@Rumkitty2000]

No coincidence. GRRM was heavily influenced by the History of the Middle Ages & events that transpired as well as Literature about the era.

[@son_of_caesar8908]

I really liked that they did this research. He has a strong claim, no doubt, since he is the current Plantagenet heir, but the fact is that Henry VII was King by Right of Conquest. He married Elizabeth of York to add legitimacy to his already frail claim through John of Gaunt, but while he was not 'legitimate,' he was still King. This was a great thought exercise and lesson about history though. I wonder how many others through that long line of Kings and Queens were not really legitimate. But as always, appearance is reality, and possession is 9/10ths of the law, especially when talking about royalty.

[@thegreypath1777]

This issue would probably have to be taken to Court.

[@jeminthehologram]

"There is no such thing as Royalty by Divine Right."

[@depuracepapodcast]

True, you are right

[@AngelaTopping]

There used to be. Kings felt they had been appointed by God.

[@miraclefifita650]

Although the Catholics. Can't see the pope can't forgive is of our sins ,that's Jesus Devine right

[@plejaren1]

"divine" right of the Reptilian Overlords I'm sure.

[@AngelaTopping]

@@miraclefifita650 That's not quite the same thing. The Divine Right of kings meant they believed God had put them there. Catholics go to confession to be forgiven for their sins, Anglicans take it up with God directly. Kings can't forgive sins like that. Charles II signed away the divine rights of his kingship as a condition for returning, so his father Charles I was the last king to have Divine right of kings, I hope that helps.

[@lovetocraftlovetocraft241]

The current royals would never give up their lavish lifestyle, power and wealth. This story was quite interesting. I really enjoyed it!

[@AndreaCandido-w9r]

wenever had The sTage namen power also never The Surmamen Power we were born wiTh our Surname of ITaLy Nobility

[@Glenn-em3hv]

Yeah their stinking greed is unbelievable!!! They are worth trillions and could end world hunger but they still live off the British people because they are so greedy!!!!

[@smkhan6773]

VERY WELL RESEARCHED, VERY INFORMATIVE AND ENLIGHTENING PRUDUCTION... YOUR CONCLUSION WAS PARTICULARLY NOTEWORTHY..

[@Odanti]

I agree! Outstanding...show!!!

[@laurenterhune4262]

WHY ARE YOU YELLING

[@GR-gq1us]

Honestly he has such a natural class and charming that looks like a king indeed

[@everynewdayisablessing8509]

I thought so too.

[@SoCal9705]

Me too. My first thought was he really looks like a King!

[@gabrielturwin3168]

watch useful chart video here kzbin.info/www/bejne/d4XCYp97p8h8pa8 ,, Queen Elizabeht II is the real monarch, because even if the theory is true, Henry VII claimed the throne based on conquest. so that made him a rightful monarch... and people accepted him, and also,I believe that Edward IV is legitimate,, so that theory is not true,,

[@EgoBrain1]

@@gabrielturwin3168 Or maybe Joseph Gregory Hallet is the true king? 🤔

[@teresabelshaw6694]

so what does a king look like has trump been arrested yet of being pals with epstein.?

[@timeforthinkers7418]

Michael definitely got the better end of the deal. He strikes me as a most genuine man, easy going, most likeable, with morals, principles, & a sense of humor. He doesn't act like a stuffed shirt, but rather someone I'd like to sit down and have a conversation with. Best wishes to him.

[@staciehaneline9533]

A true King is humble and kind.

[@thegreypath1777]

Michael Hastings passed in 2012. However, Michael was survived by his eldest son: Simon Abney Hastings. (Please see Wikipedia.)

[@sallydown4636]

What a lovely bloke King Michael is! Kind, productive, modest and rational, he seems like he'd be a good leader, regardless of bloodlines. Something that occurs to me is that the departure of the Plantagenet line from royal culture may have been a blessing to the lasting health of King Michael and his family. Being excluded from the royal lineage allowed the Plantagenet descendants to escape the practice of royal inbreeding and bring the fresh, robust, healthy DNA of commoners into their family tree. The consequences of generations of inter-marriage and inbreeding within European royalty brought the monarchy many tragic genetic issues that we know of (haemophelia and porfiry, to name two,) and there are likely additional genetic problems caused by inbreeding that are still present in the current British royal family, but are yet to be identified and diagnosed by medical science. Those who abandoned the royal practice of inbreeding with their cousins appear to be far more healthy - both physically and emotionally - than most of the current Saxe-Coburg-Gotha ("Windsor") clan.

[@poppers7317]

But inbreeding is so much fun for the whole family.

[@mohamedmaiza3866]

Lol just casually starting a succession war on tv

[@brendakipkemoi2738]

My thoughts exactly! LOL

[@juliusnepos6013]

Lmao

[@mirzar8695]

Would be nice to witness tbh 🤣

[@mohamedmaiza3866]

@@mirzar8695 u ain't lieing

[@selaelosetsiba5]

Lol

[@501promo]

I love that there was a white stallion just in the back yard. Seems poetic.

[@BritikoBeats]

Fascinating! Michael died in 2012 so according to this documentary the current monarch would be King Simon I.

[@David-bf8ez]

BritikoBeats oh what a pitty!

[@philsterthephilster]

@Valerie O'Brien Judging from recent history, I would say the present Royal family's behaviour isn't exactly superior either.

[@ronaldeau6289]

You can look for the descendants of Boudicca's father

[@DLCMORRIS]

@Valerie O'Brien I THOUGHT IT WAS ALL ABOUT LEGITIMACY AND THE hOLY bLOOD AND THE rOYAL gRAIL BLAH BLAH. sorry unintended capitals.

[@POLEARTH]

@Valerie O'Brien you d know that does "habits" and "attitudes" that you see from the said current "royals" are just stuff that was trained for them right? they were taught to not act like human even they are absolutely 100percent human. they are taught to supress it.

[@sellmav]

When the daughter said in her Australian accent “yea rawyt” it made me chuckle. 😂

[@arikosubumo2402]

Poor Jon Snow. He was robbed of the throne.

[@andreapea642]

Ariko Subumo 🤣😂🤣

[@fritzsalhay7657]

The real jon snow

[@lakeside4485]

No, LUCKY Jon Snow. He was robbed of the throne.

[@marthamendoza8731]

A CURSE WAS TAKEN OUT OF HIS BACK........I SEE NO BLESSING IN BELONGING TO THE ROYAL FAMILY. 💰 AND POWER HAS MANY ENEMIES AND TREMENDOUS UNHAPPINESS....NOTHING LIKE A LOW KEY 🔑 LIFE....IT IS TRUE JOY. IT HAS TO BE A TRUE STRONG CHRISTIAN TO STAND TO ALLL THOSE TEMPTATIONS AND STILL REMAIN FAITHFUL TO YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO YOUR LORD AND SAVIOR... THERE IS SOMETHING ABOUT DEPENDING ON GOD TO SUPPLY YOUR NEEDS , THAT KEEPS YOUR MIND AT PEACE .....IT KEEPS YOU HUMBLE AND IT KEEPS YOU IN GOD’S PRESENCE......OWSOME!!! IT IS EASIER TO HAVE LITTLE AND BE FAITHFUL THAN TO BE RICH AND BE FAITHFUL....... IT IS EASIER FOR A CAMEL TO PASS THROUGH THE HOLE OF A NEEDLE THAN FOR A RICH MAN TO BE SAVED..... IT IS TRUE..... A VERY NICE OLD LADY, MY BEST FRIEND’S GRANDMOTHER SAID TO MY FRIEND....MARRY A MAN THAT HAD TO WORK EVERY DAY, TO EAT THE NEXT DAY......SHE WAS A VERY WEALTHY WOMAN......SHE MARRIED A MAN THAT LIVED OUT OF HER MONEY 💰 AND NEVER WORKED .......

[@FJDamitTV]

Oh, Jon Snow! Hahaha

[@meaowsandwhistles]

he looks just like a king

[@ZBELZUM]

It's refreshing to see one happy king, living his life as he wants it and his lovely, happy family.

[@roseyk7677]

The irony..... The TRUE KING, Michael wanting to feed the world, whilst the imposter Charlie wants to starve and control it!!!!!

[@c10wiremantawwallace13]

Amazing how this man who is the rightful king of England is happy with his simple life in Australia. God gave him peace & freedom to live a life he loves without a kingdom to rule over at atime when no man should be king over the lives of others. Michael would be a great king if he took that throne.

[@MikeNeri1]

A beautiful story, beautifully told. Thank you!

[@TheLRider]

Would love it if you did the same to trace who should legitimately be called the True Prince of Wales. When Llywelin was ambushed and beheaded in 1282 his wife Elinor and baby daughter Gwenllïan were taken and incascerated in a Nunery at Sempringham in Lincolnshire and were imprisoned there until their deaths. This ensured no legitimate heir to the title of Prince or Princess of Wales. Would love to know, based on similar research who is alive today and could be proved to be that legitimate heir. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 BTW we are still not allowed to bring their remains home to Aberffraw on Anglesey, the location of their historical Royal seat.

[@henriettel.duijvestijn-van781]

The whole Dutch house of Orange is illegitimate!! Wilhelmina could't get children. Juliana was adopted. Her first born was from her father...! They kept her away, somewhere in Holland. Beatrix was the 2nd child. She and the rest ( our so called king and princesses) are all bastards, because Juliana was adopted, so no one has the blood nor genes from the first Dutch king, hundred years ago.

[@LadyCheshire95]

From my quick research the prince's of whales eventually run out of sons with their daughters marrying into the British Royal family. So this guys the prince's or if you take Edward to be legitimate which most schollers do at this point then it's king Charles.

[@GailBrenner-vt9ou]

​@@LadyCheshire95 Wales.

[@nathaliebatiste9521]

Who should be sitting on the throne? No one ! It’s time to do away with this royalty nonsense!

[@hmjg182]

True

[@LindaPow]

And take back all the wealth a put in in a better public purse away from all the cons in politics and create a new team like London Real party who have what it takes to take on a bigger role

[@leighmumford5609]

Well researched and very interesting.

[@melinda6024]

As a child, I wondered what makes one family royal and another ordinary????? I think it is simply power and money fueling it all, Titles being obtained by sheer force and brutality. Their blood is not blue, it is red just like anyone else's.

[@fromgermany271]

Their blood might not be blue, but at least it accumulated gen-defects over centuries. So they are special. 😂😂

[@coopermcarthur995]

Still to this day i have the same question. It seems clear money and resources are what sets these two groups apart.

[@lisatarita9505]

Beaucoup de consanguinité du aux mariages cousins cousines accompagné de tares successives

[@Inquisitor2024]

Group of psychopaths able to do ANYTHING for personal gain

[@susanmercurio1060]

You might like to read The Theory of the Leisure Class by Thorstein Veblen. He clears all of this up.

[@robertogomez8128]

King Michaels love of ordinary people just shows how kingly he really is. He persona just radiates royal knighthood in this video.

[@Aguamarina38]

Excellent documentary.

[@DC_R]

Yeah this channel is pretty good

[@jhonjhonjhonson7773]

That would be great to have someone who grew up as a normal every day man take over as king,

[@diatplay]

Did you miss the bit about Henry betting the family fortune on horses? The current royal family was a blessing during WW2.

[@jhonjhonjhonson7773]

@@diatplay interesting, no I missed that part

[@ethanwashoe5868]

@@diatplay the difference is that man Henry who bet on hoarded grew up spoiled and privileged, king michael didn’t his family are normal people. They would be a great royals for a couple generations until there descendants start becoming spoiled

[@AscentofTrollbane]

would love to see it, and then him lose his mind with power. "Bloody Michael"

[@giabarrone7422]

I thought the whole point of the royal family in 2020 was the weird stuffy customs? Do they actually do anything of value besides draw tourists for those weird stuffy customs? If it was just some guy drinking beer in front of his castle throwing a BBQ, I don't think it would have the same draw......

[@Vlad-tt9is]

The Monarchy is an institution so whoever is the monarch the institutio continues so who the actual monarch is , is not the most important thing. And just like all laws created by humans, they only apply if they can be enforced .

[@Darilynn714]

He was so cool! He even looked like a king.

[@annettepilgrim9626]

SUCH A BEAUTIFUL FAMILY. THANK YOU FOR SHARING.

[@susheeltm]

I loved Michael and his family...so humble and down to earth. To me, that's the true sign of aristocracy.

[@susheeltm]

@Bandit Ferret Humility is a virtue.

[@firstlastyoutube]

This comment is real shit

[@zandradefoe3760]

Susheel Marcus Agreed he would have made a wonderful king. I heard he has now sadly passed away.

[@zandradefoe3760]

Bandit Ferret The Fake Royal family are now under arrest, the seals have been removed & all the windows are covered up.

[@teresabelshaw6694]

@@zandradefoe3760 how do you know where you there or just wishful thinking

[@rawmark]

i heard that the royal family has been paying him a nice, umm, pension to stay in Australia and not make waves.

[@aisham6819]

So how is this documentary made ? Shouldn’t it not be exposed

[@HumongousBob]

@@aisham6819 free press 😂 I guess

[@gravemind3590]

I mean they could just have him killed if he was too much of a threat. Just like they wacked diana because she was going to marry a muslim. That would ruin the bloodline for all eternity and it wasn't acceptable.

[@NaRii]

@@gravemind3590 diana wasnt royal blood tho

[@xhante_]

If that’s true, then he really got the best part of the deal. Getting to live his happy life and getting a bit of hush money allowance from the crown.

[@bostongalden1171]

Kingdoms came and went back then. Royal and noble houses were constantly being replaced through wars,betrayals, luck and other means. This family is just another example of aristocratic families that ran out of luck. Thus another family name took it's place. That's just how these monarchs and noble families functioned back then. Beautiful family though.

[@amandafletcher2267]

I like how well this documentary is put together but there are several things wrong with it. 1: Edward IV could have been illegitimate. However, it's highly unlikely. His mother Duchess Ceicly was highly guarded and watched. She would not have been able to have an affair. Yes it is possible, but very unlikely. Secondly, the pregnancy clock begins on the 1st day of a woman's menstrual cycle and babies are normally born between 36-40 weeks. It is very possible that Edward IV was conceived by his parents before his father went on campaign. 2) Even if Edward IV was "illegitimate" which I don't believe he was, he still WON the crown but right of conquest when he defeated Henry VI. Which either way legitimized his claim to the throne regardless of his parentage. 3) Using my 2nd point, since Edward won his crown through conquest, he was still the rightful King when he executed his brother George Duke of Clarence. Also, Edward attained his brother upon his execution. So, that means George's children lose EVERYTHING. 4) Moving on to next point, since George's children lost everything when he was executed, and Richard III and his heir were dead, that passes the Platengent claim to the throne to Edward IV's eldest daughter Elizabeth of York, who had already married Henry VII. 5) The current monarch, Charles III, is descended from Elizabeth of York through her daughter Margaret and the Stuart's. So as well put together as this video is, take with a grain of salt. The only way to prove whether the current royal family is legitimate or not is test bones and I don't see anyone doing that.

[@misty5805]

first impression He looks like he would be a great king. He looks like he would be fair and generous, too.

[@bettyvanderhooven-schmaasc4235]

Not if he'd been raised in England as royalty. That speaks volumes about entitlement.

[@theresahawkins7810]

I'm now hearing that Joseph Gregory Hallet is real Monarch of the the UK. Time will tell.

[@gabrielturwin3168]

watch useful chart video here kzbin.info/www/bejne/d4XCYp97p8h8pa8 ,, Queen Elizabeht II is the real monarch, because even if the theory is true, Henry VII claimed the throne based on conquest. so that made him a rightful monarch... and people accepted him, and also,I believe that Edward IV is legitimate,, so that theory is not true,,

[@zandradefoe3760]

Theresa Hawkins Im going with the one that was on the History channel a few years ago, they did blood tests which proved positive.He would have made a great King.

[@zandradefoe3760]

Except now our Evil Royals have now been arrested for treason & other crimes, as from three days ago the royal crests have been removed & all the windows blocked up.

[@theresahawkins7810]

@@gabrielturwin3168 the royal family is evil and time for the CURRUPT is UP.

[@rkbrown2092]

@@gabrielturwin3168 It is true and Greg Hallet has all the papers to prove it. ~Moreover the queen and pope have already acknowledge that this is so which is why the Crest from the palace gates has been removed and the palace is now boarded up from the inside and is now guarded by Gurkhas

[@TesterAnimal1]

Just goes to show that the whole CONCEPT of “royal” is utter bollocks.

[@TheSapphireLeo]

Indeed.

[@shaunsteele8244]

why don't you march down there and tell them

[@deipweedecuchiekrucher7384]

It's not it's just somebody pulled the biggest, heist in history

[@briangriffiths3852]

WOW! WOW! WOW! A man after my own heart! UTTER BOLLOCKS!! as you say, better expressed perhaps by another UTTER! added to the sentence. I am not a Royalist in any sense of the word and to live a life inside such a bubble where every single whim!! even a fart! would be catered for in case the bubble burst! They do not know what it is like to have dirt! under their finger nails or even break out into a sweat from their brows from hard graft. Pushing pens all day sat on their backsides is not my idea of money paid for a full day's work??????????

[@shaunsteele8244]

@@briangriffiths3852 the Queen literally worked as a mechanic during the war, but I'm sure she doesn't know what it's like to have dirt under her nails lol

[@sandyblue8082]

I really feel this man is genuine, kind and fair minded. If our current 'royals' are aware of this travesty of justice, then I am even more ashamed of them now!

[@veronicahaney6005]

of course they are

[@caseyslove]

It is not an injustice watch the whole documentary to get the facts.

[@MEh-dc4jj]

This is simple. Then let princess isabela (grand daughter of supposed King Michael I) marry prince george (eldest son of prince william).. then all will be well..

[@katphyre]

200 years ago that's exactly how it would be solved.

[@barbarabannister7518]

That would be a beautiful fairytale, but by the time Prince George is old enough to marry, the Monarchy of England may very well only be in the history books.

[@MEh-dc4jj]

@@barbarabannister7518 both are kids now.. prince george is the 3rd successor on the line.. let them meet maybe 15 years from now.. and that would be a fairytale.❤❤❤

[@RedTitan5]

Yes its one of the solution

[@kimberlyarrington5721]

marko cubero Yes that would be Awesome

[@johnberntson1669]

The real flaw in the logic of this alternative history is simple: if they had been royalty, their lives would have been much different. Some who died would have lived and vice versa. Who they married would have been much different, because of diplomacy and politics. Would there have been a reformation? And when? Would the Stewarts have taken the crown? Would there have been a civil war and, if so, who's head would have been cut off, if anyone's? Would Cromwell have existed as we know him? There would still be a Plantagenet family, but history would have played out entirely differently and King Michael and his family would never have been born. My experience tells me that whoever the current occupants of the palace would be now, they would not be all that different. They play a role. How necessary that role might be is debatable. However, I do believe the royal line is to be congratulated for gradually stepping down from power, gracefully and peacefully - many countries had to go through bloodbaths to accomplish the same thing. So, if the cost of this peaceful transition is that the mostly agreeable figurehead gets some small percentage of public funds to continue in the role, well, Britain could do far worse.

[@reflexionesdelabiblia6711]

But the roles the monarchy play now are too much...why do they get to decide where their taxpayers' money goes? And they bahave so badly. All they do is give the people's money away. They rob Peter to pay Paul. Either they should be what they would be-gvt or they shouldn't be at all.

[@psychedelicyeti6053]

Exactly. There's no such thing as blue blood, just random coincidences.

[@Santu7220]

Yes, certainly, an upbringing can help to become better at a job. And there are transgenerational markers passed on through genes. I believe there is valid claim in what is presented in the documentary. As we talk about bloodline, far varied genetics are more healthy (MCH immunity). More healthy than inbreeding to keep material possessions and spheres of power in as close as possible a family circle. It´s a tragedy for everybody involved, and even more so, when far-reaching decisions are made.

[@JavierAlbinarrate]

I agree with you, although probably Charles I doesn't

[@reflexionesdelabiblia6711]

@サイレントボイス if you aactually believe that 100percent then you are deceived.

[@ceciliapreziose3783]

he looks kingish, perfect head for a crown n shoulders for a cape

[@NoahCrowe]

Exactly the person you want to be king is the person who would prefer to just have a pint with his friends and leave everyone be.

[@adarivera9519]

King Michael is Awesome! Such a nice man, I’m glad he’s happy.

[@jamiejay5599]

In another parallel universe, he is the king ❤

[@baloneysammich4973]

Right! From reading the comments Michael passed on. So yes he is living in another universe and probably having a wonderful time.

[@TheBasher-_-]

"The Crown always finds the right head"

[@AscentofTrollbane]

And "Bloody" King Michael brought beheadings back in a big way!

[@MultiSUPERLATIVO]

Or "Evil always finds a dirty way".

[@pinupdoll97]

This man looks so much like my dad who recently passed. He had similar mannerisms and outlooks too. Super cool that you were able to follow the family line