Are We in a Cold War with China?

Рет қаралды 306,669

PolyMatter

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 1 100

@XDarkGreyX 4 ай бұрын

In a way, peace is always a cold war.

@Godfrey544 4 ай бұрын

Deep bro

@Jykobe491 4 ай бұрын

That's if your opponent is the u.s

@Larfage 4 ай бұрын

Maybe the real cold war was the friends we made along the way

@wayando 4 ай бұрын

Only if there is an entity that is relentless in it's pursuits ... Such an entity forces others to continuously prepare.

@cmonman85 4 ай бұрын

Peace is a cold war! China is an entirely different society under the dictator Xi and authoritarian CCP ..[For honest truths, pls read the informative and insightful, multi-page comment by 'Mister Lianghui' at, "The Coming War on China": kzbin.info/www/bejne/jGWVfKeJmtRmq6ssi=gaElCf8Iekxh8yiB]. Like I said, China under dictator Xi and authoritarian CCP and is a country with a barbaric history. 🤷

@ExcelSpreadSheetUserWarrior 4 ай бұрын

hopefully it leads to cool technological innovations and not nuclear war.

@China_Secret_Police 4 ай бұрын

Innovations of the west, are easily taken by Thousand Talents

@archmage_of_the_aether 4 ай бұрын

We have enough toys. I'd prefer old products that last for 15 years than new products that need to get replaced every 6 months, or that are obsolete after a year.

@jonseilim4321 4 ай бұрын

Understand that China is not the Soviet Union and the general attitude is friendly to the United States, China is far far older than Communism and the attitude is informed more by Buddhism and Confucianism

@ThexXxXxOLOxXxXx 4 ай бұрын

Yeah no a war's abound US built the ditch to contol the flow of water, China want to destroy that ditch for everyones benfit, US will not allow that to happen

@harpmango4169 4 ай бұрын

The best I can do is both

@spooky.- 4 ай бұрын

The amount of clips of Putin doing random things are so funny

@Johnny_Savage 4 ай бұрын

Too bad it's missing the ones where he does his famous lingerie hauls

@joieman 4 ай бұрын

Whatever people say about him, he's quite the character in his personal life!

@stankiah 4 ай бұрын

@@joieman That's carefully staged propaganda.

@joieman 4 ай бұрын

@@stankiah Maybe it is. But we haven't forgotten about what happened when Joe Biden tried to ride a bicycle.

@tewekdenahom485 4 ай бұрын

@@joieman or climb stairs

@redmondthealien7840 4 ай бұрын

Born too late for the Cold War. Born too early for the Cold War. Born just in time for the Cold War.

@pookie_bear777 4 ай бұрын

The never ending cycle

@kennethoram4292 4 ай бұрын

America needs international tension to keep on justifying the collosal expenditure on Defence and internal Surveillance.

@chiquita683 4 ай бұрын

The moment you realize the Axis powers won and took over Europe and US 😳

@chiquita683 4 ай бұрын

@@kennethoram4292Look into the formation of NASA and who was being brought into the country across government agencies at that time. It'll make sense

@TheGrinningViking 4 ай бұрын

I unsubscribed because of this uncritical repeat of propeganda. Not even smart propeganda.

@Mr.Prince_Tunmise 4 ай бұрын

Bro, this was so frustrating to watch. You mentioned a lot of ideas but never really engaged with them.

@shocktrapproductions6332 4 ай бұрын

So why did you watch it?

@AndreVictorGoncalves 4 ай бұрын

@@shocktrapproductions6332 It is like asking a cigarette addicted why he still smoke. You can't control yourself from watching antichina misinformation.

@addanametocontinue 4 ай бұрын

Title asks if US and China are in a cold war, most of the video is about China-Russian relationship. WTF...

@ejw7247 4 ай бұрын

I get what you mean. I love his production quality and some of his vids are great, but there are more than a few that have this issue. I know this is supposed to be a high level overview of complex topics though, and I don’t think I would actually watch an hour long video in his style.

@sonayyalim 4 ай бұрын

Because he has no substance, he is just here to spread some mostly "incorrect" facts, some ridiculous framing and whole lot of BS to manufacture consent for what is coming. FYI, USA is about to approve a *T*rillion dollar budget to modernize its nuclear arsenal. This channel is basically paid propaganda mouth for alphabet soup agencies.

@Tsskyx 4 ай бұрын

>reads thumbnail >"cold shdja" >mfw

@The-Samuil 4 ай бұрын

Faux Cyrilic makes me feel like I am having a stroke

@ahmednasr7022 4 ай бұрын

"put it in H" @@The-Samuil

@KamBar2020 4 ай бұрын

Typo 👀

@paztwel 4 ай бұрын

COLD ШДЯ 😅

@meowtherainbowx4163 4 ай бұрын

Let's hope Doidld Tyatsmr doesn't get elected again.

@alburaq3290 4 ай бұрын

Is the quality of videos going down? This one was going nowhere. Didn't feel like there was an original idea in the whole video.

@happydan20 4 ай бұрын

These really feel like wikipedia fact dumps for runtime but no point.

@scaria4806 4 ай бұрын

It’s Think tanks paying creators to read an anti china script

@alhazred3555 4 ай бұрын

it was probably written by AI

@taco7043 4 ай бұрын

It's an ad for brilliant. youtube just mostly clickbait now

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

@@happydan20 So basically this felt like your average RealLifeLore video?

@rustix3 4 ай бұрын

7:20 "half of all Russian imports now comes from China" 17:18 "25% of all imports to Russia comes from China" So how much Russian imports are actually coming from China? I am confused.

@liger411 4 ай бұрын

25% is the pre Ukrainian war number, half is what it is currently with the war

@phillip76 4 ай бұрын

There is a lot of errors: 1. U.S. vs China is about values? They are more similar then they are different. They are international realists. U.S. is an offensive realist, while China is a defensive realist. According to research by Princeton University, U.S. is really a plutocracy, run as a national security state ( CIA etc) that want to run and rule the world. China wants to defend itself against this. 2. The video is contradictory. In one part of the video, the video argue China is part of U.S. order, while on a later part of the video, it said China and U.S. is in a rivalry. These are contradictory claims. What is more true is that China is rivaling U.S. in commerce, just like how Japan did a few decades ago. This is not a war of ideology, but of economic competition. U.S. do not want Chinese firms to outcompete American firms, because U.S. is rule by plutocrats. 3. It is about U.S. vs China. I think it is about U.S. vs the world. U.S. for the last few decades has be using the rest of the world as a giant ATM machine in the form of the dollar. U.S. print money to buy actually goods and services from the rest of the world. I don 't think the rest of the world want this arrangement any longer.

@mandaloretheproud6622 4 ай бұрын

@@phillip76 Pretty sure this guy is a paid propagandist, copy pasting the same comment also indicates it.

@NeostormXLMAX 4 ай бұрын

i hope people are realizing now, that all these geopolitical "expert" youtubers are literally taking their scripts from AI, and sometimes they hallucinate different answers, i've seen reallifeshill's credibility tank after that horrendous scotland video, tbh all his videos are trash, but that one finally was the straw that broke the camels back

@rusinoe8364 4 ай бұрын

@@mandaloretheproud6622yup, likely Chinese employed or resides in China. Information warfare. Calling China "defensive" is laughable.

@jolly-rancher 4 ай бұрын

17:04 why did you show GDP per capita for USSR vs China then GDP for Russia vs China? a bit misleading to say the least.

@AndreVictorGoncalves 4 ай бұрын

This entire channel is just antirussia and antichina propaganda

@Hunterchuck 4 ай бұрын

Because he thinks the USSR was just Russia and not a union of nations, much like America is a union of states. This is a very common mistake and honestly nobody really knows or understands the history of these times since it's practically impossible to get honest analysis of what the USSR was in the beginning versus what it became, in all of the detailed context. Most of what is easier to find is a bunch of claims that have nothing to back it up, just a lot of trust me bro information out there.

@jamiewarren4094 4 ай бұрын

Because he is showing a relational imbalance between the alliances based on their economic output, im not sure what else you would suggest using

@Hunterchuck 4 ай бұрын

@@jamiewarren4094 GDP is different than GDP per capita though. When it comes to GDP per capita it's more favorable towards smaller nations, which is why they are on top rather than big nations.

@alburaq3290 4 ай бұрын

@@jamiewarren4094Then why not compare GDP per capita in both instances? Why compare GDP Per capita in the first instance and nominal GDP in the second?

@mooxh5850 4 ай бұрын

Born too late for : WW2 Born too early for : Intergalactic War Born just in time for : WW3

@rustix3 4 ай бұрын

17:00 to be fair you are using here "GDP per capita" as a measure on the screen and then 17:12 just "GDP", if it were "GDP per capita" Russia would be above the World average and China below.

@Hunterchuck 4 ай бұрын

Yeah, he made a huge mistake with that and it actually makes zero sense. When it comes to GDP per capita, smaller nations tend to be on top rather than larger nations.

@ccash3290 4 ай бұрын

Switzerland has a much higher GDP per capita but is much weaker than China. Raw GDP can be used for military and economic strength.

@cahdoge 4 ай бұрын

GDP numbers are always always somewhat iffy. His point still stands though.

@phillip76 4 ай бұрын

@jonathanodude6660 4 ай бұрын

@@Hunterchuck it was clearly on purpose. he read it out in the script.

@OrangeDiCapa 4 ай бұрын

i like how we talk about china supporting an aggressive nuclear power but when it comes to any of america’s allies, the same descriptor is never used despite america’s numerous aggressive military actions

@brianlowe904 4 ай бұрын

Because there’s a big difference between Russia threatening nuclear winter every few seconds in a war we all know it’s bad and any event you can think of that happened ten years ago. The key is “aggressive nuclear power” I don’t remember the last time the us annexed Canada.

@0mane0 4 ай бұрын

@@brianlowe904 my guy you CAN'T be for real. Only from the top of my head, tell that to: Cuba, Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Korea, Vietnam, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, literally every latin american coutry really over the last 80 years-ish, Indonesia, Iraq, Palestine, etc etc etc

@YourLordMobius 4 ай бұрын

USA! USA! USA!

@marcinwachowicz1425 4 ай бұрын

when was the last time that USA threatened a country with nuclear weapons?

@SpawnOfHades 4 ай бұрын

To show you what type of journalist he is, go ahead and try to name the apartheid state that the US is sending billions of dollars to, your comment will get auto removed, i dont need to say anything else.

@japorto100 4 ай бұрын

Just ridiculous. China also provide dual purpose items as drones and lots of other stuff to Ukraine. Why isnt it called the enabler of the Ukrainian military machine?

@KidKingdomHearts 4 ай бұрын

I'm assuming your talking about DJI right? I assume their models going to Ukraine are modified (I would hope so), but yeah I guess DJI does count as Chinese-Ukraine commerce.

@elmouto3883 4 ай бұрын

China still buys a large amount of jet engines from Ukraine.

@uumuu 4 ай бұрын

It's estimated that around 30% of DJI drones end up being used for military purposes. Huge amounts of Chinese drones are definitely going towards Ukraine.

@salzkasten 4 ай бұрын

What is a "new cold SCHDYA" ?

@kelvinyu6323 4 ай бұрын

*Nesh cold SCHDYA

@KamBar2020 4 ай бұрын

Slava TSMC 🇹🇼

@eternity.in.a.m0m3nt 4 ай бұрын

Shitdzya - $hit + schizophrenia

@TerrAkon3000 4 ай бұрын

man, this comment section is wild

@lenOwOo 4 ай бұрын

Hearing the word that US and UK shared many commong things made me once again realized. US independence/revolutionary war are pretty much just war among themselves. And not local indigenous people fighting outsider.

@KamBar2020 4 ай бұрын

Civil War Was 😮

@phillip76 4 ай бұрын

@danielhenderson7050 4 ай бұрын

Would have made more sense to compare oil consumption with India. 3x their consumption with the same population. Canada is like half of Germany.

@adlerzwei 4 ай бұрын

It's about oil production. India is not a big oil producer.

@thebestevertherewas 4 ай бұрын

China is more industrialised, obviously it consumes more oil.

@subatenome 4 ай бұрын

The amount of American exceptionalism in this video is staggering. China and Russia are by no means the "good guys", but that doesn't exempt the US from all the atrocities it has committed in the name of "spreading freedom and democracy" or rather maintaining control over US interests abroad, whether it be for economic exploitation or for strategic military presence. American foreign policy has and still is ruthless. Instead, this video rolls with the narrative that the Americans are by default the good guys instead of approaching the topic of the video from a neutral position and answering the question accordingly. This video, therefore, feel like it's little more than propaganda. What a shame.

@后宫后 4 ай бұрын

For Westerners, China takes away a lot of their technology, but Westerners also make a lot of money, the most important thing is that the Western system is not competitive, they do not use the money to maximize development, so the Chinese will create a new sustainable development model

@Electroshk 4 ай бұрын

He thinks that trying to break free from american capitalist oppression and prioritizing development of productive forces is aimless and purely anti-american rather than NATO which has freedom and democracy. what a koolaid drinker.

@johnsmithjohnsmithjohn 4 ай бұрын

@@后宫后 takes away technology? by not respecting patents? why should the third world respect patents to basic technology and pay exorbitant fees to first world nations who have robbed them for centuries?

@Salisboury 4 ай бұрын

You must be new to this channel. This video, just like a lot of its other videos, is just some anti-China pro-West propaganda.

@xiaoyangwang8588 4 ай бұрын

When the video mentions "Nor it is not the first time Beijing has backed an aggressive, nuclear-armed regime", I'm expecting to see a figure of China-US relationship, but it turns out to be North Korea lol

@prathameshchaudhari 4 ай бұрын

India recently overtook china as biggest importer of Russian oil.

@doujinflip 4 ай бұрын

Well yeah, it's cheap energy they can use or resell funding a war that they have no sympathy or connection with.

@luisemiliopadilla6027 4 ай бұрын

And then they sell it to Europe. And the sacrosanct sanctions?

@VodkaPandas 4 ай бұрын

Guess who the biggest importer of Indian oil.

@hamza-chaudhry 4 ай бұрын

@@VodkaPandashaha

@carkawalakhatulistiwa 4 ай бұрын

Guess who is the biggest buyer of Indian oil. European Union hahaha 😂

@Williamtolduso 4 ай бұрын

Double standards are rampant in this video. Perhaps the real path forward is admitting our mistakes and move forward?

@NikitOS-vv4ks 4 ай бұрын

I agree. Accepting the Ukraine war and promoting "sovereignity" at the same time is the real culprit.

@johnc1873 4 ай бұрын

I agree. US invasion of Iraq and afghantisan , and funding genocide worldwide like in the Middle East is a concern for all of us

@farhanpranto2668 4 ай бұрын

why do i feel whatever negative he told about china in this video , applies to usa exactly. like he talks about chinese exceptionalism but dont talk about american exceptionalism.etc.

@mharley3791 4 ай бұрын

He was describing how Chinese ideology currently is different than what it was in the past, which was communism. He wasn’t saying it was good or bad. He was just describing it. Do y’all not have comprehension?

@farhanpranto2668 4 ай бұрын

@@mharley3791 I have compression that's why I noticed when talking about china the tone,music,video all negative.not usa. and try to frame it as worlds problem when in reality it is only usa problem,

@b33lze6u6 4 ай бұрын

50 cent

@tintin5341 4 ай бұрын

Why would he talk about American exceptionalism if the topic and the content caters more to Chinese exceptionalism. I'm pretty sure u can find plenty of videos about American exceptionalism

@andezong9565 3 ай бұрын

This video isn’t talking about the U.S…

@framerprojects 4 ай бұрын

I disagree with the statement that Chinas sovereignity promises to other countries are in jeopardy because of hostility towards their neighbours. For example, the U.S. installed and worked together with dictatorships for decades and yet no democracy doing business with them cared. Money speaks the strongest 💪 language.

@3X3-n3j 4 ай бұрын

Yeah, he conveniently forgot about banana republics. And Iran (operation Ajax).

@marcinwachowicz1425 4 ай бұрын

Chinas sovereignty promise, are not a jeopardy because U.S. installed dictatorships during cold war??? This makes no sense. Only an AI could write something this illogical

@KironManuelCards 4 ай бұрын

Either be good or bad.

@PoliticalEconomyPK 4 ай бұрын

2:35 While it's true that after the soviet collapse, America and some other countries experienced relative calm during this period, it's important to recognize that this era was not entirely peaceful. Numerous conflicts occurred around the world, and in some cases, these were perpetuated or exacerbated by U.S. actions. The notion of 'unprecedented peace and prosperity' overlooks the wars, interventions, and instability that affected many regions, often as a direct or indirect result of U.S. policies

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

Yeah this is the same thinking that leads westerners to label part of history as the 'Dark Age' just cos Rome fell, even though that meant little beyond Europe. They think that the west being safe meant the whole world was. Far from it.

@Global-yt 2 ай бұрын

Still, US agression and other agression, and the volume of war in general, was a lot more chill than, say, the 60s.

@yaphonghor4409 3 ай бұрын

US aggression and disrespect for sovereignty will not go down well with all nations in this world! Catering to Western value means one must take care of the interests of the Americans! This really isn't what smart nation can afford to do...

@robezy0 4 ай бұрын

Very unfortunate to see what's happening to this channel. As many have pointed out, this is far from the former quality content. Was wondering what the content has to do with the video title at about half the whole play time, and the conclusion just falls really short, when there could be a clear cut answer to it: The only people framing this a new cold war is politicians and strategists who seek personal gains, while the community of geopolitical researchers is in pretty clear consensus that this framing makes no sense. I guess the channel tried to keep neutral with this approach but it doesn't really feel genuine with the clearly negative framing of China throughout the video.

@3X3-n3j 4 ай бұрын

It’s been a gradual shift sadly. Man I miss the impartiality, has anyone got any KZbinrs that still remain neutral?

@jayl371 4 ай бұрын

@@3X3-n3jCaspianreports. He’s the only truly neutral KZbinr currently

@Global-yt 2 ай бұрын

@@3X3-n3j Ryan Chapman. My life has never been the same.

@user-op5vz5jw4p 4 ай бұрын

US surrounds China with millitary bases, and was surprised that the China is building a closer relationship with Russia. US noticed the growth of China in 2008 and China being unwilling to submit like Japan. China pushing for a multipolar world is a threat to the unipolar hegemony therefore fearmongering is required. Statistics like 8:41 is created to make China seems dangerous when it clearly not. US millitary power is the equivalent of Russia and China. (But because of the bias the video worded differently). If you include US allies, US would be alot higher than China too.

@aboard04 4 ай бұрын

As this channel increases popularity, the editor has gradually switched from neutrality to US propaganda. Starting naming and shaming by refusing to supply any citation or evidence.

@NeostormXLMAX 4 ай бұрын

he wants to be reallifeshill really bad, or noneasinteresting

@deezeed2817 4 ай бұрын

This creator like most of the faceless creators are just state department accounts. There's alot of them on KZbin, Just type in the search box in "China" and you'll get a bunch of videos that smear China. Google/KZbin is engaged in information warfare.

@3X3-n3j 4 ай бұрын

@@NeostormXLMAXhave you got any KZbinrs that aim for impartiality? Asking honestly.

@andezong9565 3 ай бұрын

Lmao “U.S. propaganda” he says, what a joke

@3X3-n3j 3 ай бұрын

@@andezong9565 I mean he has a point, you can keep on feeling that way if you want but you can’t deny the US bias.

@shakiMiki 4 ай бұрын

China is not alone in pursuing its own national interests vis a vis Russia. India & Israel are doing that, without much scrutiny.

@Jack-sq6xb 4 ай бұрын

3 authoritarian “republics” that love oppressing Muslims

@m1l3s27 4 ай бұрын

People are definitely scrutinizing Modi and Bibi.

@wildwolf111 4 ай бұрын

@@m1l3s27 America is signing a new defence agreement with India and giving billions and billions to Israel. That doesn't feel like scutiny.

@shakiMiki 4 ай бұрын

@@m1l3s27 What makes you say that? I have seen little evidence,.

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

@@wildwolf111 It is scrutiny - just to encourage them rather than reign them in. Both nations serve its interests, so its 'scrutiny' is to back them more.

@Sahanawaj_ 4 ай бұрын

aggressive nuclear-armed regime sounds like isreal to me

@geznicks 4 ай бұрын

Islam is the biggest threat we face as civilised humans

@nasis18 6 күн бұрын

My wife is Kyrgyz. Nice shout out.

@risingsun1156 4 ай бұрын

This was indeed a cold war 2.0, just China play the role of US in the past, US play USSR.

@J.R.Y. 4 ай бұрын

Sorry, but the cadence and inflection of the narration is so repetitive and annoying. Maybe try mixing it up a bit. Otherwise, great content.

@NeostormXLMAX 4 ай бұрын

he is copying real life lore and using AI for the script and research, its also why 7:20 "half of all Russian imports now comes from China" 17:18 "25% of all imports to Russia comes from China" due to hallucinations, also differences in gdp measurements

@hamza-chaudhry 4 ай бұрын

Who's we?

@suspendwings 4 ай бұрын

good question!

@BARRUTG 4 ай бұрын

The US obviously. He explicitly says "we went to the moon" as one of many examples.

@hamza-chaudhry 4 ай бұрын

@@BARRUTG Bit of a big assumption to assume everybody watching is American

@motianton 4 ай бұрын

Most r @@hamza-chaudhry

@xiphoid2011 4 ай бұрын

@@hamza-chaudhry He has analytics of his channel. He doesn't have to assume, he knows.

@kezyka6775 4 ай бұрын

Polymatter proving yet again that any headline or title ending with a question mark can be answered with "no"

@jordanvasilev3556 4 ай бұрын

Why not compare US oil consumption vs China, but Canada?

@mharley3791 4 ай бұрын

Mostly because the United States is the largest producer of oil in the world so it doesn’t really make sense to compare. It’s consumption also.

@DSTKO-w7z 4 ай бұрын

As a Canadian I can tell you that Canada should not even be trying to extract that oil. It's shit tar sand oil that requires tremendous effort to extract and is messy. The environmental toll is staggering and it's harmful to those who work in the extraction process. Cancer rates among oil sand workers and those living in nearby communities are high. Even economically speaking that oil is not worth extracting.

@peterg6695 4 ай бұрын

canada numba 1 baybee 🇨🇦🍁💪

@usucktoo 4 ай бұрын

Because thats a different topic and video? Duh

@Kevin-kd6hf 4 ай бұрын

Although the content creator is trying hard to save the recent decline in viewership, we should also remain fair and objective when considering the changes in China-Russia and China-West relations. Before 2018, the interactions between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin were not frequent, at most within the normal range. The real change actually came from the sudden shift in U.S. policy toward China after 2018. In fact, Xi's reputation from when he came to power in 2012 until 2017 was not so bad. His political and economic policies primarily continued the openness of his predecessors. Correspondingly, from 2008 to 2017, China's international image steadily improved, as can be seen in the Pew survey results on China's global image, reaching its peak in 2018. After 2018, the shift in U.S. and Western policies pushed China and Russia firmly together. From the ban on Huawei to the trade war, relations rapidly deteriorated, with Western media actively supporting this policy shift, and COVID further pushed China-West relations to a freezing point. Even several charts in this video corroborate this shift, all indicating that significant changes in China-Russia and China-West relations occurred in 2018. The underlying cause of this shift is evidently the West, led by the U.S., initiating actions to maintain its dominant position, which is understandable. However, the way this video narrates the situation, as if Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin proactively formed a close personal relationship that led the West to change its attitude, I believe is incorrect. I would say that for China, external factors are the primary driving force, while the personal characteristics of the Chinese and Russian leaders are secondary factors.

@VibronicCow 4 ай бұрын

China stealing trade secrets and being dishonest regarding commerce was arguably more the reason for the change in relations from the west. Political infiltration, self interest etc

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

Yeah what people fail to notice is that it isn't China that changed, it's the US. You can literally track the increase in hostility (for instance via trade wars and violations of Taiwans' airspace) to 2017. Nothing changed in China then, Xi came to power in 2012. What changed was America - specifically a certain orange man came to power on the back of an anti-China crusade, which his successor has just continued cos the populace loved it. It's actually ironic considering how much that man is disliked by half the US electorate that 'their side' largely continued his legacy, albeit a bit more multilaterally.

@puntmannoor3403 4 ай бұрын

Yeah, America grand pacific strategy.

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

@@puntmannoor3403 Funnily enough, the 'land of the free' has the worlds' largest prison population, by far. Perhaps that's why they view 'containment' as somehow an innocent thing to do.

@NikitOS-vv4ks 4 ай бұрын

Well, yeah, Trump was kinda anti-China, I'm not sure about the US though

@roxylius7550 4 ай бұрын

Funny how China is an “enabler” while India is an innocent bystander.

@kaleeysmith8801 4 ай бұрын

western media propaganda, very typical. $$$$$$usd.

@NaProbablyNot 4 ай бұрын

This comment was brought to you by…. CHINA! 😂

@3X3-n3j 4 ай бұрын

@@NaProbablyNotI mean, what’s the difference between their actions from the global stage. Both stay “neutral” Both exploit the cheap oil from Russia given the situation.

@JosePineda-cy6om 4 ай бұрын

The Indians have been very open about their buying Russian our, using a bit of it yor themselves, mix it with Saudi oil and immediately resell it to the Europeans - at near double the price befare the war. It sucks, but it was Europe who got herself into thus - they hit themselves with these sanctions, more than Russia

@jpachuta164 4 ай бұрын

@@NaProbablyNotsaid americunt😂

@MrHoboBen 4 ай бұрын

short answer: no. long answer: no. if you want to define any sort of international relationship cooling a 'cold war' while the US is still intertwined with China economically to a degree never before seen in civilization, what use is the term 'cold war' in describing... anything?

@KasomaTendo 4 ай бұрын

0:06 bro just needs some love😂

@dicksonoloo6705 4 ай бұрын

A hug a day keeps the nukes away

@rusinoe8364 4 ай бұрын

Winnie the Pooh is sad

@st.altair4936 4 ай бұрын

"Are We" trying to drag the viewer into the west's side lmao

@redhidinghood9337 4 ай бұрын

It's so funny how every time they make a toast they hesitate to drink it

@adamperdue3178 4 ай бұрын

Putin doesn't really like to drink. I assume that's why he's hesitant, and not because he's worried it's poisoned or anything like that.

@J-wm4ss 4 ай бұрын

3:04 cuba was too small for the us to ignore? They've been going through massive sanctions for decades. They still have 70 year old cars!

@telvanniis 4 ай бұрын

if you have to ask if you're in a cold war then it's pretty obvious you're not in a cold war. the current situation between china and the usa is nothing like the cold war between the soviets and the usa. the cold war in the later half of the 1900s was an ideological battle between capitalism and communism across the globe, both powers were imperialist and spreading their ideas with military might, and both were armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons and were constantly very nearly on the verge of starting a nuclear war. the current situation with china is more just an economic battle, there's no "battle for the soul of the world", it's just china wants more money and influence and america wants more money and influence so there's tension.

@zixiaozhu841 4 ай бұрын

I have to close this video because of the fact and logical mistakes in the video. At 14:22, your video states countries like Taiwan Hong Kong and Vietnam, it's ok to say Taiwan is a country because they have an independent government and military, i have no interest in starting my debate on this point. However, the British return HK back to China in 1997, and since 1997,7.1, Chinese military always existed in HK.

@wadafik 4 ай бұрын

Isn't HK supposed to maintain its independence for a couple more years before being swallowed into China?

@wallacekatini3424 4 ай бұрын

And Taiwan is China's territory and province, better known to the world and UN

@adamperdue3178 4 ай бұрын

'Country' doesn't necessarily mean fully sovereign. For example, the United Kingdom is made up of 4 different countries; Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and England. Each of these countries often gets their own representation in international events, but nobody thinks of Wales as being independent from the UK. Technically speaking, the USA is made up of 50 different countries, though nowadays most people think of US states as provinces with fancy names and a little more autonomy than usual.

@cloodberst 4 ай бұрын

@@adamperdue3178Hong Kong is not even technically an independent country. “one country, two systems”

@flz_5848 4 ай бұрын

Honey wake up, the new China video essay just dropped

@KamBar2020 4 ай бұрын

Babe, hold your FARD 😮

@NeostormXLMAX 4 ай бұрын

new AI generated hallucination video by le geopolitical "expert"

@joetrump2983 4 ай бұрын

@@NeostormXLMAX even propagandas are outsourced to AI

@RyanDelaney-m9l 4 ай бұрын

8:42 are you sure a 2017 RAND estimate is accurate though? We’ve seen how poorly Russia has done at their war since 2022. I thnk these numbers may have been high on the side of Russia, if not also China

@Volition1001 4 ай бұрын

This is a great point.

@Rubinrus 4 ай бұрын

They're too high all over the place, not just Russia and China but also USA and France. Ever since WW2 there weren't any wars where both participants had same types of tools available, it was usually about USA having a superiority all over the place against some rebels or w/e with AK-47 and some bombs. Pretty much a one sided slaughter, especially if more than one NATO country did participate. And Ukraine in this conflict literally has all the tools delivered as a loan and has its economy on life support by third powers, in a sense, it is like a zombie that won't lose until you either cut off its head or cut off its blood supply. And I'd argue if Russia were to use the kind of fighting USA used in Vietnam, Ukraine would've already lost or would've been permanently wounded (Chemical weapons that were used in Vietnam are still causing mutations). Hence, there's a thick red line that Russia cannot target crop fields on territory of the "Breadbasket" country.

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

@@Rubinrus This will probably flip when the US inevitably gets dragged into a conflict with Iran by you know who. Then guess who'll be backing them.

@yuning8045 4 ай бұрын

@@Rubinrus One of the biggest contributor in military ranking calculation are nukes, Russia has almost 6000 of them which automatically puts them above 95% of all other nations, same with the US.

@lordkekz4 4 ай бұрын

@@yuning8045 Nukes are relevant, but unlikely to be used in Cold-War-Style conflicts. I think a big part actually comes down to how resilient and powerful a country's critical infrastructure and military industrial complex are: Russia's is decently resilient, AFAIK the only import they can't make themselves are semiconductors, and those they get from China. But the Russian war economy is not nearly powerful enough to make up for the insane losses in Ukraine and is increasingly held back by their own crumbling infrastructure. China's production capacity looks to be absolutely massive and resilience should be decent too; they can even make some halfway-decent semiconductors (only like 5-15 years behind Taiwan & South Korea, depending on the tech). The US and EU are at a similar point as China in terms of semiconductors, but they are overly dependent on China for most non-military supply chains. Unless the west is attacked first, there will likely not be enough public support for military engagements in the face of a looming economic crisis in case of Chinese sanctions. Similarly, the Chinese economy would suffer harshly if they stopped the exports, but a dictatorship is more likely to be able to suppress dissent in such a case.

@anglewoodsdashcamfootageso2779 4 ай бұрын

Is there democracy in America?

@KamBar2020 4 ай бұрын

Does Camel Smoke Cigarettes 🚬🐪❓

@anglewoodsdashcamfootageso2779 4 ай бұрын

@@KamBar2020 honestly it's only run by two parties. There is no third choice

@dungeontnt 4 ай бұрын

@@anglewoodsdashcamfootageso2779those two parties are paid by the same people openly

@anglewoodsdashcamfootageso2779 4 ай бұрын

@@dungeontnt exactly what I was thinking. It's the same here in the UK.

@infidelheretic923 4 ай бұрын

Yes. Just not an optimal one. So long as we don't get another Trump term.

@zawadmuttaqi5597 4 ай бұрын

0:07 that's got to be the most awkward and emotionally cold hug in history

@phillip76 4 ай бұрын

@mharley3791 4 ай бұрын

This is literally the stupidest comment in this entire comment section and I don’t even know what to say lol. You say this video has a lot of errors, but all of your comments are just bullshit. 1. He explicitly says in the videos that both China and the US aren’t interested in spreading their values as much anymore. 2. You can be a part of an order and also be rivals. It’s like how people can be on the same team and be rivals. This isn’t contradictory this is just easy common sense. 3. Your understanding of macro economics is terrible. Having the dollar be the reserve currency is terrible for the US. It’s one of the reasons why you United States has been thinking about moving away from having the Dollar be the reserve currency and you can see this in the Republican platform with the Trump tarrifs.

@Johnny_Savage 4 ай бұрын

reported you for spam. learn how to use yt

@simray7602 3 ай бұрын

@@mharley3791 All around the world hate the dollars dominance, and USA people hate it too? USA initiate several wars in middle east to keep the petrol dollar. But the US dollars for reserve currency is bad?😂

@Matrix-tz5yc 4 ай бұрын

20:28 why cant US accept China for the next superpower like UK accepted US. It will be the "best"

@richdobbs6595 4 ай бұрын

Are you being sarcastic, or are you just a bot? The UK "accepted" US becoming the superpower because it had no choice, and the US had been at least a nominal ally for years in WW2. OTOH, it is not at all clear with demographic collapse and the flaws in the Chinese economy that China will continue to rise, or has already started to falter.

@jimliu2560 19 күн бұрын

USA will never accept to be 2nd. 13:35

@SuperAwesomeMovies 4 ай бұрын

Where have you been? The Cold War never ended. We’ve been in Cold War 2.0 since the 20th century.

@JonathanDelgado-vh6es 4 ай бұрын

No not really the 1st Cold War [1945-1991] was a computation between two equal super powers after the Soviet Union collapsed the Russian federation that came out of it could not compete with the United States anymore and it still can’t. So no the Cold War ended in 1991 and did end

@Casey093 4 ай бұрын

Anybody who believes differently is living in his own little world...

@sakakaka4064 4 ай бұрын

@@JonathanDelgado-vh6es The Cold War was never about the USA or the USSR but about Western democracy and communism.

@dreamerthief2216 4 ай бұрын

@@sakakaka4064 China its hardly communist,its more a fight between two gangs trying to control the whole city (world), nothing to do with ideology.

@JonathanDelgado-vh6es 4 ай бұрын

@@sakakaka4064 it was yes but once the ussr collapsed the only communist state at the time with the power to stand against the unite states was gone especially since china around that time period transitioned to a capitalist economy so after 1991 no state that was actually communist could stand against the United States in any shape or form

@DenofLore 11 күн бұрын

For the last 15-20 years buddeh. Where ya been?

@jakobabou-chaker9107 4 ай бұрын

Proxy war in Ukraine ? What? Ukraine is defending its freedom!!!!

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

That's what it means to Ukr. Not what it means for the rest of the world.

@jakobabou-chaker9107 4 ай бұрын

@@ArawnOfAnnwn I get what you’re saying but isn’t your logic a little bit flawed here? If it’s not a proxy war to the Ukrainians then what is it ?

@Johnny_Savage 4 ай бұрын

where did he say proxy war in ukr? I only heard the vid mentioning the proxy wars US conducted during the cold war

@infidelheretic923 4 ай бұрын

It is but it represents Russia's ability to control its neighbors and expand its influence with Brute force. Thus NATO nations have no choice but to assist albeit cautiously.

@Т1000-м1и 4 ай бұрын

This channel is still quite a bit smaller than it would be expected

@konplayz 4 ай бұрын

Who is we? 😂😂

@tklarp4735 4 ай бұрын

Americans and allies, obviously. What a weird question.

@NeostormXLMAX 4 ай бұрын

@@tklarp4735 aka only ones stupid enough to believe this video

@konplayz 4 ай бұрын

@@tklarp4735 How bizarre of you and the videomaker to assume everybody is an American or an ally of theirs, or even that all Americans and allies are supportive of their government’s initiative to start yet another cold war.

@outsidewell6932 4 ай бұрын

@@konplayz😂

@Johnny_Savage 4 ай бұрын

@@konplayz why are you writing in english?

@ReseteaLaSalud 4 ай бұрын

*Are We in a Cold War with China?* 00:00 - 🤝 Xi Jinping, usually stern and stately, broke character by giving a rare hug to Vladimir Putin in May 2024, signaling a significant moment in China-Russia relations. 00:44 - 🕊 Historical parallels arise from the close relationship between China and Russia, reminiscent of past alliances that eventually fractured due to ideological differences. 01:52 - 🌍 The 1969 Sino-Soviet split led to China's isolation, indirectly opening the door for future relations with the U.S., and eventually transforming China into an economic powerhouse. 03:09 - 📉 The 2008 financial crisis exposed vulnerabilities in U.S. leadership, while China's resilience and infrastructure growth during the same period bolstered its global standing. 05:39 - 🌐 The friendship between China and Russia has evolved over 50 years, with increasing diplomatic and economic ties, especially highlighted during significant events like the Winter Olympics in 2022. 07:06 - 💰 China's increased imports of Russian oil, benefiting from discounted prices post-Ukraine invasion, underscore its strategic economic support for Russia amidst global sanctions. 09:19 - ❌ Despite the proclaimed "no-limits" friendship, China and Russia remain uncommitted formal allies, with China avoiding direct military involvement in the Ukraine conflict. 10:31 - 🔍 Xi Jinping's China, unlike Russia, remains deeply tied to the global economic order, making it cautious about actions that could jeopardize its economic stability. 12:05 - 🎯 The current China-Russia relationship is more about opposing U.S. dominance than promoting a unified ideological vision, contrasting with the clear ideological divides of the Cold War. 13:11 - 🛡 China's promotion of "sovereignty" and "multipolarity" appeals to smaller nations disillusioned with the U.S.-led global order, offering a more flexible, development-focused alternative. 14:00 - 🏗 China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is expanding its influence globally by building infrastructure and investing in various countries, particularly in Asia and Africa. 14:25 - 🌍 BRI offers an alternative to the U.S.-led world order by focusing on economic development and connectivity, appealing to countries feeling marginalized. 14:49 - 📊 Despite criticism of the BRI, many nations see it as a beneficial opportunity, especially those in need of infrastructure and economic growth. 15:10 - 💼 China’s approach through the BRI is more transactional and less concerned with internal politics or human rights, contrasting with the U.S. emphasis on values. 15:34 - 🏦 Beijing uses its financial clout to attract partners, offering loans and investments that come with fewer political strings attached compared to Western aid. 16:00 - 🛤 The BRI is seen as a strategic move by China to secure its own economic interests and to counterbalance U.S. influence globally. 16:25 - ⚖ China’s influence through the BRI is reshaping global alliances, creating dependencies that may give Beijing more leverage in international affairs. 16:53 - 🤝 As China deepens its ties with various countries through the BRI, it also seeks to present itself as a leader of a new, multipolar world order. 17:20 - 🔄 While the U.S. promotes a rules-based international order, China’s BRI offers a more flexible, development-focused approach, appealing to nations seeking alternatives. 17:48 - 📈 China’s growing influence through the BRI raises questions about the future balance of power and the potential for a new form of global competition. 18:10 - 💡 Some nations view the BRI as an opportunity for economic growth and development, while others are cautious about the potential debt and political implications. 18:40 - 🌐 China’s strategic investments in critical infrastructure, like ports and telecommunications, are seen as a way to increase its global reach and influence. 19:10 - 📡 The BRI is not just about economics; it’s also about expanding China’s soft power and creating a global network of influence that challenges U.S. dominance. 19:35 - 🚨 Critics argue that the BRI could lead to debt traps, where countries become overly dependent on China and lose their sovereignty. 20:00 - ⚙ Countries involved in the BRI face a delicate balance between reaping economic benefits and maintaining political independence from China. 20:30 - 📉 There is growing concern about the long-term sustainability of the BRI and the potential risks for countries that take on large amounts of Chinese debt. 21:00 - 🏛 Despite these concerns, many governments see the BRI as a necessary gamble to achieve their development goals and improve their infrastructure. 21:30 - 🌏 The BRI is a clear example of China’s ambition to reshape the global order and establish itself as a central player in international affairs. 21:55 - 💬 The U.S. and its allies are increasingly aware of the geopolitical implications of the BRI, leading to more strategic competition with China. 22:20 - 📊 As the BRI continues to expand, it will play a significant role in determining the future landscape of global power and influence.

@axelnilsson6478 4 ай бұрын

I don’t quite understand why you colored in Ukraine with the Donbas but without Crimea. Surely if you went with the Kremlin line you would not have colored in the Donbas, and if you went with the internationally recognised line you would have colored in Crimea? It seems like a pointless concession.

@baiwuli6781 4 ай бұрын

Does that offend you ?

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

Same reason he didn't show a US president in the thumbnail - he wants to weasel down the middle. Avoid picking a leader in a contentious contest in order to not alienate half his audience. Same thinking for Ukr, just go halfsies.

@alex8130a 4 ай бұрын

Crimea was annexed by Russia in 2014,

@NeostormXLMAX 4 ай бұрын

the whole video was script generated by ai lmao

@axelnilsson6478 4 ай бұрын

@@baiwuli6781 just you asking that makes me think you’re a brainless hack :)

@MrPinguinzz 4 ай бұрын

1:11 Mao head built like a alien

@bluesquare23 4 ай бұрын

I’m in a Cold War with your mom! She’s amassing large stockpiles of nuclear weapons..

@paulwally9007 4 ай бұрын

6:45 -The picture of the border is from Manzhouli. It illustrates the partnership perfectly: the enormous modern Chinese arch and the comparatively tiny Russian one that's been there for decades.

@SumatraTiger 4 ай бұрын

I can feel you have less motivation to open for US action for their promotion of democracy in Iraq,Syria, Libya getting better now? What's wrong ? R you affraid of YT will reduce subscriber and demonetize your channel?

@TheDotdotdot0 4 ай бұрын

He is afraid, propaganda is far and wide on this platform unfortunately

@HappyGuy-cn9po 4 ай бұрын

It all started with a hug.

@Blex_040 4 ай бұрын

19:50 Not really on topic, but I always wonder how world leaders speak with each other during casual meetings. Do they always have translators besides them and every word goes through them? But in this clip it looks like they're speaking directly with each other. And I don't think Putin knows chinese nor that Xi knows russian. So do they speak in English with each other? That would be pretty ironic, speaking the language of their common enemy to plot against said enemy 😂

@RafaquaQuetta 4 ай бұрын

another McCarthy dog whistling the tune of its master

@weijieliang-ue8lq 3 ай бұрын

"speaking the language of their common enemy to plot against said enemy" are you finding: "Anti-French Alliance"

@AnymMusic 4 ай бұрын

14:30 here's the thing. I don't think Xi beliefs he does anything wrong. If you don't see Bhutan, Hong Kong, and Taiwan as independent countries, and merely as parts of China trying to break away, then him interfering with that wouldn't be undermining the sovereignty principle, as Xi would see it as being within Chinese borders. Nobody thinks they're the villain. Everyone thinks that they're the hero fighting the good fight

@elmouto3883 4 ай бұрын

It's a pretty weird subject tbh. Bhutan doesn't recognise ROC or PRC as the real China. They still only recognise the Qing dynasty as the real China. HK has never been sovereign. Taiwan and Beijing are in a civil war, meaning intra-country.

@backofenp0mmes493 4 ай бұрын

That thumbnail is so cringe. Don't use those letters like that.

@Grek1574 4 ай бұрын

Shdya!😂

@Johnny_Savage 4 ай бұрын

or what

@kingmj87 4 ай бұрын

My money’s on the trusty old “no (but it’s complicated)” Pressing play

@dixonbainbridge3146 4 ай бұрын

Yesss, love this guys voice

@raymondleung6522 4 ай бұрын

Is he also the guy who narrates/owns Wendover?

@De_Séchelles 4 ай бұрын

Too simple, sometimes naive 🇨🇳💯💯

@duncanhw 4 ай бұрын

@@raymondleung6522 no, wendover is just a wikipedia TTS

@KamBar2020 4 ай бұрын

Infographic= Geopolitico

@OliverNorth9729 4 ай бұрын

@@raymondleung6522No, I think they're friends though. Real life lore too.

@jeffcheng6710 4 ай бұрын

I don't know man, china might not think they are in a cold war with you though.

@doujinflip 4 ай бұрын

If you understand Mandarin and watch their news over the past two decades, you'd think we're already in one. The Party needs a powerful foreign enemy to justify its continued domestic rule.

@anonyKinetic 4 ай бұрын

14:39 This is true, but I don't think it matters. The same is true for the U.S.-led bloc as well. The stated goals are freedom democracy and human rights. Yet, the U.S. consistently financially and militarily supports corrupt or authoritarian states with low democracy index scores and/or human rights e.g. Gulf States, and Israel.

@JoshChristiane 4 ай бұрын

Great video, Poly! As always you manage to break down complex topics into simple to understand analogies. Much appreciated! 😁

@dusttoh8927 4 ай бұрын

Two countries can be at war while their leaders are best friends. Its called a game of chess except its real life.

@Mushroomlau 4 ай бұрын

2:26 "china joints wto." Theres an error there join got an extra t

@Atlantjan 4 ай бұрын

Not me thinking you're talking about the "WO"

@lagmonster7789 4 ай бұрын

Whenever I joint anything it tends to go up in smoke 😅

@xeanderman6688 4 ай бұрын

Yes we are. There, saved you 22 and half minutes of your life.

@samsniper2000 4 ай бұрын

"chinas neighbours like Hong Kong" that's like saying Wales needs protection from England.

@sanguinor5609 4 ай бұрын

Wales isn’t drastically culturally different nor does it have a completely opposite political system.

@samsniper2000 4 ай бұрын

@@sanguinor5609 hong kong is as culturally different as northern Ireland is from the rest of Britain.

@sanguinor5609 4 ай бұрын

@@samsniper2000 Yeah the CCP are just as bad as the protestants.

@Global-yt 2 ай бұрын

I guess the difference is that HKers are less fond of Beijing than the Welsh are of London.

@samirahmane3630 4 ай бұрын

When the U.S does something bad you call it mistakes, meaning involuntary, when Russia or China does something bad you call it a deliberate part of their strategy to control the world... Great, and next time do more effort about saying half of imports then 25% from China to Russia. Quality went extremely down, video filled more with misinformation than information.

@MrTryAnotherOne 4 ай бұрын

When watching Xi and Putin together it almost seems like Putin is insecure ... almost submissive in Xi's presence.

@KamBar2020 4 ай бұрын

Kim Jong Un : Comrade, please hold ma SOJU 🍶

@NeostormXLMAX 4 ай бұрын

lmao like all the g7 countries bending over to kowtow to americans? like when usa visits japan they literally bent right over in submissive pose, like how americans lie and say china overwhelmingly dominates brics so countries shouldn't join, yet china is far less dominating than the usa does to the g7 etc

@Johnny_Savage 4 ай бұрын

couldn't be otherwise. xi is putin's oxygen tank and both are well aware of it

@lemagnifique1573 4 ай бұрын

Its more like Putin is struggle with his sickness, he had health problems

@florian1874 4 ай бұрын

4:41: what kind of salut is this?! where are they looking??

@Eye-am-Metalchip 4 ай бұрын

Thumbnail says: New Cold Whye

@MoodyGooseCow 4 ай бұрын

I think it’d be more accurate to compare the geopolitical situation now with the geopolitical situation that existed between powers for centuries before 1939 rather than the Cold War.

@djp1234 4 ай бұрын

14:04 fix your map. Crimea is part of Ukraine. That illegal occupation is only recognized by North Korea.

@Joseph-mw2rl 4 ай бұрын

You aren't real homies if you don't give them a Gold Medal of Friendship

@DamianReloaded 4 ай бұрын

Iraq was the inflection point of all this. Which is the same than saying America's limitless ambitions. The world also stood by when America decided to cross half the world and invade its borders over nothing.

@elmouto3883 4 ай бұрын

At that time, USA was the only world super power.

@IStoreGas 4 ай бұрын

Another thing is when the president of Senegal or Kazakstan comes to the US they’d be lucky to get a low level meeting, meanwhile they get a state reception, regardless of how small you are. I’m not here arguing politics of both sides here but if i was a smaller country i know who I’d pick as a friend.

@supermanifolds 4 ай бұрын

Who the fuck is “we”

@DarkPortall 4 ай бұрын

8:40 i highly doubt that. could china and russia be invaded by the usa? not alone, no. but china and Russia's navies are pathetic compared to the american navy, and the same goes for the air force. america also has world class logistics, every piece of ammunition including missiles comes in cartridges that can be easily attached to a truck, whereas russian logistics has already shown it's capabilities in ukraine. if the graph is accurate and china is weaker than russia, then china and Russia have no hope of matching the us, let alone nato.

@Infosphere-cr5bk 4 ай бұрын

Its definetly a weird form of cold war when the opponents are each others biggest trading partners, lets hope economic stability is more important then military dominance. Decoupling will hurt both sides pretty bad, but its already in process

@GMK189-f2k 4 ай бұрын

China is no longer USA’s biggest trading partner. Mexico as well as Canada passed China as biggest trading partners just last year. China becoming less and less influential on USA . It’s a relief!

@shakiMiki 4 ай бұрын

Chinese economy is currently being transformed. Focusing on consumption rather than export. Which allows for more assertive foreign policy. The days of deep interdependence are long gone.

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

@@GMK189-f2k Ironically one of the largest investors into Mexico is China lol. So much so that there are now calls to curtail trade with Mexico as well, as much of their manufacturing facilities are Chinese owned.

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

@@GMK189-f2k Ironically one of the largest investors into Mexico is China. So much so that

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

@@GMK189-f2kthere are now calls to curtail trade with Mexico as well, as much of their manufacturing facilities are Chinese.

@tomcrt3487 4 ай бұрын

Video Summary: 22-minute long Brilliant commercial

@Anonymous-l2q 4 ай бұрын

Lol, how much did the Pentagon for this propaganda?

@ironmantis25 4 ай бұрын

14:13 "Many of the small countries in need of protection". Sorry bro, but Hong Kong is not a country it's a city/special administrative zone.

@aaaaaaa_aaaaaaaaaa 4 ай бұрын

Why was Ukraine map shown without Crimea?

@JamesBlume-u4i 4 ай бұрын

He has to say; he's not a robot!

@jonclee 4 ай бұрын

Definitely a first hearing china being called "young" lol

@NeostormXLMAX 4 ай бұрын

amerigolems literally think this unironically, they keep saying for example bullshit like tibet not being part of china, even though tibet has been in china for longer than the united states has even EXISTED. you know after the angloids killed 100 million of the natives

@MrTomtomtest 4 ай бұрын

It has been years.... And same with Russia. The West, at least public opinion, somehow managed to miss it all those years but this is nothing new.

@d47rk 4 ай бұрын

Only Russia-Ukraine. No Israel-Palestine.

@phillip76 4 ай бұрын

He is working for the CIA.

@valdius85 4 ай бұрын

We have never stoped being in one.

@agmuntianu 4 ай бұрын

you should really use the map outline for Ukraine as recognized by UN , not Russia ....

@ArawnOfAnnwn 4 ай бұрын

That isn't Russia's map either, it's no one's map. He just went halfsies to try pandering to everyone.

@KingCreeper-1026 4 ай бұрын

If anything it’s a map of Ukrainian territorial control immediately before the 2022 Russian invasion, judging by the exclusion of Crimea and the inclusion of the territory Russia officially annexed since the full-scale invasion (which is currently under partial Ukrainian control anyway).

@developerumair8705 4 ай бұрын

Still waiting for detailed video on what israel is doing with palestine the brutality

@DeftPol 4 ай бұрын

The scale of the crisis in Sudan is actually greater and is a direct result of centuries of Arab Islamic imperialism and Colonialism in North Africa, but no one talks about that at all.