Aryan Migration: Who are our ancestors, really?

A new study on Indian genetics says some sort of migration did indeed take place into India and that the Indus Valley civilisation is key to all South Asian populations.

[@alexyuarayan1212]

You are right,In Thailand ,we accept language ,culture,tradition from ancient India.

[@RohitYadav-hg7mq]

Love from India.

[@manikandanb5111]

There is no ancient india. Could you plz tell me the year of ancient india that you are telling

[@Rajkumar-ul7ko]

@@manikandanb5111 it may be subcontinent of india.

[@Nirmala1969]

@@manikandanb5111 . its before the arrival of jews to India . say 2nd, 3rd, 4th BCE

[@Nirmala1969]

@@manikandanb5111 : those days India was known as naavalan theevu

[@avavav3776]

I am a Half Assamese and Half Bihari who lived in Andhra+ Rajasthan+West Bengal and married a Keralite.

[@arunkrishnag7894]

കൊച്ചിന്റെ വിധി അല്ലപിന്നെ😁

[@samriddhimondal2096]

U are a true indian🤣🤣🤣

[@theblissedcorner1728]

I m also an Assamese ❤️ nice too meet an Assamese too

[@asmityadav4216]

Your dad is/was in the armed forces??

[@mohdrahilkhan9690]

🤣🤣🤣

[@rini7317]

In the end all I can say that ,“ We Indians are just mixtures ”.....

[@lakshmiram2935]

Just go see dna results of majority of tamils, we are not your mixtures

[@georgefrancisjolly5762]

Yes

[@arindambose9863]

Wrong genetically all indian in the Indian subcontinent even the pastun have the same dna

[@arindambose9863]

@Jhenkar R maybe but dravidian and aryans origined In indian subcontinent

[@arindambose9863]

@Jhenkar R thats bullshit this shows your lack of knowledge 😒 Hinduism was born in indus valley civilization and aryans migrated from indian subcontinent to rest of Europe and Central asia the r1a genes started Indian subcontinent talking about dravidian they were always present over here no one came from outside till the maurya time when Greeks had come. Aryan invasion theory is myth by britishers to to show we are a inferior people

[@rohanthan]

I read quite a bit of the scientific work on DNA out there and let me do a brave attempt to simplify and summarize. There were always migrations and even all ethnic groups that make up Indians came from somewhere (starting with Africa).From what I understood from these DNA studies of countries where IE languages have spread the following DNA clusters were the main building blocks for the populations: 1.North and South Indians (in varying proportions)= Ancient Ancestral South Indians (South Asian hunter gatherers)+ Iranian Farmers+ Yamnaya steppe pastoralists+ miscellaneous (later invasions and migrations) 2. Modern Iranians= Iranian Farmers+Anatolian farmers+ Yamnaya steppe pastoralists+miscellaneous (later invasions and migrations) 3. Modern Europeans= European hunter gatherers+ Anatolian farmers+ Yamnaya steppe pastoralists+ miscellaneous (later invasions and migrations) You can see the common thread here for all three categories are Yamnaya steppe pastoralists. So may not be not too difficult to make an inference on who were the original speakers of proto-Indo-European language.

[@testprofile1840]

@@declanharp9633 hi could you please share which paper are you talking about I too want to know about it thx for sharing in advance

Read "David Reich" Harvard Study on South Asians. Also Read a 2009 paper by some Indian authors in a reputed Intl Journal which challenged the Aryan migration theory by telling you about the findings of more diversity of R1a in India and said Indian version seems to be older. Although David Reich explains it now (last decade saw a boom in genomic studies). Also the scholarship right now is heavily skewed towards proving that aryan invasion happened and it probably happened. We need more archeological findings to clarify or refute claims. Also there is a slim chance that the genomic studies reveal something which renders the recent gene studies wrow, although chances are extremely slim. Again David Reich also talks about this standalone 2009 paper by Indian authors and receives it as legitimate challenge to Aryan invasion theory but refuses it by saying that now they have collected more data and genealogy has grown by many folds.

[@kaushiksaikadali7460]

@@declanharp9633 the yamnaya people are generalized here. There were many migrations since Yamnaya culture, and there's history from Bactrian culture and Central Asian cultures. Yamnaya is just the proto-Indo-European start point, however, there was a culture that was completely in Central Asia after that, which then migrated to other places South, Southwest, East and West. They're like almost a millennia apart, and have developed characteristics than the original Yamnaya people. That probably gives us where the R1a comes from, Central Asian Iranian tribes were known to be migrating to farther places even until 5th century AD, to as west as Iberian peninsula and as North as modern day Baltic Sea. Could be that heavy intermixing in the dark ages caused R1a to spread in Europe, while it was generally Asian.

[@adyrockstarb]

Thank you for this information. Interesting and captivating

[@TruthSeeker69921]

Whatever in sanskrit is aryan's making.. they were invaders with horses came to north india.. they created sanskrit, vedic system, caste system by making themselves as brahmins of the highest hierarchy.. the true indigenous ppl are the dravidians(tamils) likely originated from harappa civilisation at the lost river of sarawathy.. there is even an ancient tamil city of Harappa in pakistan.. u guys can google and see.. but indian government is covering up because mostly are aryans and they will nvr acknowledge tamil as the oldest spoken language in the world.. soon links to indus pictograph are being decrypted using spoken Tamil.. incredible breakthrough.. that would bring back glory to Tamils whom were suppressed by the aryans for centuries till today.. so dont believe onto whatever the aryans made.. they are the crook brahmins plundered india's wealth and followed by british.. the original proto-shiva seal found in harappa civilisation in a meditative state can be directly linked to south india... incredibly the harappa civilisation emphasised on drainage system, fertility, equility, animal rights, self and social well being plus also meditation.. all these with emphasise to water can be seen in our Tamil culture.. the aryan's are from mesopotamian blood where they believed in gods, kings, pyramids, zigurats, temples, hierarchy totally different from harappa civilisation where there was not even weapons or war.. that is the ultimate shiva's teaching brought over by the dravidians to south india.. aryan mixed and destroyed most of the authentic Tamil teachings.. by right dravidians dont even pray during their civilisation, they only meditate because they have already came to realisation thousands of years ago.. om namah shivaya

[@gauravsolanki4794]

This Aryan Invasion theory was brought by Max Muller and this is one quote by him "India has been conquered once, but India must be conquered again, and that second conquest should be a conquest by education." -

[@shamikchakraborty3341]

there's nothing wrong with associating with our Aryan brothers. The British are not Pure Aryans, but they are mixed-Aryans like us.

[@gauravsolanki4794]

shamik chakraborty There's nothing right in wrong things.

[@shamikchakraborty3341]

Now that's your bias talking.

[@shamikchakraborty3341]

Max Muller might have had bad intentions. But his theory is not wrong. If Max Muller hadn't done it, then i'm sure by 1970s some Indian Linguist would claim that Sanskrit is the mother of all European Languages. Instead of calling Max Muller a liar, your argument should be *"Aryans were never Blonde Hair Blue Eyes White Skinned people"*

[@shamikchakraborty3341]

Proto Indo European people started from the northern coast of Caspian sea. Currently in Southern Russia. So neither Max Muller not the British were Pure Aryans, because the Aryan Race never had any documents that demonstrate their physical features.

[@bettyboossister3918]

All I know is that I'm HUMAN....That's all that matters...

[@convadodeltaro1997]

You are very naïve. Too naïve for the real world.

[@razorphil4973]

convado deltaro19 i feel u and can understand ur comment.

[@littleworld9632]

Koko

[@Sunny-wf4cq]

Good. Then never get into religious matters

[@bettyboossister3918]

@Eternal President Kim il Sung Thank You

[@wezzuh2482]

Amazing that linguists proposed this centuries ago, through nothing but a comparative analysis of language. And now modern genetics confirm it.

[@chrisnewbury3793]

And yet most establishment linguists today are in collective denial about such things, along with the rest of Academia. Of course, I believe the people who control such institutions, have known this all along.

[@thsht1677]

Where did linguists suggest that? And which sources they used for comparison? Can you please source for this statement, would love to learn.

[@wezzuh2482]

@@thsht1677 The hypothesis that some of the languages of India, Iran and the Languages of Europe descend from a common ancestor was first proposed by WIllim jones in the eighteenth century. The Hypothesis has been refined ever since

[@robinchettri6966]

@@wezzuh2482 I also think that Sanskrit and Latin had the same ancestor at some point. Many words sound similar in both languages. Take this sentence for example; My name is ______. Meum nomen est ______(Latin), Mama nama _______ asti (Sanskrit). They did have a common ancestor and no one can convince me otherwise.

[@wezzuh2482]

@@robinchettri6966 yes they undoubtedly did. This is consensus among linguists too.

[@dhruvjaiswal6998]

The reason why the inhabitants of indus valley civillization came to further south was because the resources of that area were almost finished

[@shalinitiwariscorner5210]

In Rakhigarhi, smashed skulls, pierced backbones and numerous weapons have been excavated. And they all date exactly sa!e as the last constructions in Indus Valley Civilisation. This is enough to suggest that just like Mesopotamian civilization, people of Indus Valley also faced attacks from steppe pastoralists. But to reach to the conclusion that the battle was genocidal, will be hurry.

[@a.bharadwaja7224]

Indians react wild on this subject. Almost all countries have migrations and invasions in the past. But no one cares like we do. Most of the western countries have no original roots. And they don't mind who their ancestors are. They know that was in the past and not going to help anyway now. They are practical people. Why cant we do that. We don't want to come out of this same old dispute and fighting over the very issue . It is not going to help anyone , in fact it creates more conflict. We all love our country. It doesn't mean we fight over the issues on dispute. If you think we were the victims because of this migration/ invasion we should try to rectify it. At least work towards it. Conveniently , we blame politicians or Westerners . They left us ages ago. Irony is, given a chance majority of us would love to migrate to western countries now . Why is this hypocrisy? We are so energetic to fight over the " ANCESTERS HISTORY" but cant stand up and talk firmly with a politician. Cant blast a corrupted officer. Cant follow basic rules which save many people from RTA. Being a good citizen is far more important than anything.

[@anilbiz8921]

No one has original roots ...Man migrated and moved ever since he appeared on the evolutionary ladder a bout 1 million years ago. We are all human beings divided by dogmatic and narrow minded religions, caste,race and language divide. Let's respect that and unite on a common sentiment which binds us all- We all feel love for our dear ones, we eat food, feel sorrow and pleasure. It's these qualities that matter. Not our kula and shiila.

[@Sankara.sankara]

A.Bharadwaja good baby

[@calumhogan6933]

@@anilbiz8921 we all come from ethiopia

[@curcumin417]

Because of inferiority complex based on color and caste.

[@kollurubharathsimha539]

It's not issue of ancestry it's issue of looking down on us and dividing us

[@nandav529]

History can be said in thousand way. This is also one of the story... The real fact is you will never know the truth

[@onion4550]

That last bit hit too close to home man.

[@harry9238]

So why south Indians are more similar to Africans??? And why north Indians are more similar to Iranians, Egyptians and Europeans??? Why Mongolians are more similar to Chinese , Koreans and Japanese ??? Than Europeans?? This is History Science And that story must reveal

[@anmoltiwary1043]

This is what the leftists do.... They take a research....a true research... They tell you some facts.... And in their explaination, they manipulate the facts according to suit their own narrative.... So the narration transforms from factual explaination, to manipulated statements. I have read the report, i even had a chat with Vasant Shinde, the head of the archeological research in Rakhigarhi...and also Dr. Niraj Rai, the researcher in the Rakhigarhi DNA report which this guy was talking about... I would ask all the viewers to go through this before believing this bullshit. Read what the experts who did the research has to say about this...and not these pathetic idiots. Or Read the report yourself. theprint.in/talk-point/does-rakhigarhi-skeleton-dna-confirm-dravidian-ancestry-or-reignite-aryan-invasion-debate/110576/ theprint.in/culture/archeologist-who-found-4500-yr-old-skeletons-in-haryana-doesnt-buy-aryan-invasion-theory/113852/

[@lightr2187]

Then what you believe is truth?

[@lightr2187]

@Hare Krishna c'mon its bcoz indians are all mixed and moved to each other regions as a north and south indians have developed alot of similarties. And some africans group also migrated to south india later mixed with dravidian.

[@Vijay_Ganesh]

Dig deeper into "keezhadi" & most probably all the history & research may have to be rewritten...

[@ForthDimensional]

In madurai??

[@Vijay_Ganesh]

Yes.

[@deepblue3682]

Keezhadi is from BC200, even later than Asoka of Mauryan empire. Adichanallor of tirunalveli is earlier than keezhadi, but thats just a grave.

[@lifenrose9972]

👍👍👍

[@kbee225]

@@deepblue3682 please do your research. Keezhadi is dated to 6th century BC.

[@kishorekannappan105]

You have forget to say that the dna obtained from rakhigarhi nearly matches to the dna of irullar caste in Tamil Nadu.

[@acharya8959]

LMFAO Incorrect. Vedic Sanskrit is first attested around 1400 BCE, this is confirmed by contemporaneous Mittani Aryan. The earliest Tamil literature is from only 300 BCE. On the other hand, Hittite is attested as early as 1700 BCE, and Mycenaean Greek as early as Vedic Sanskrit. Tamil doesn't even begin to compare in terms of the date of earliest attestation. BTW, do you know The oldest grammar form of Tamil itself has Sanskrit Name and first chairman of Sangam, Agastya too has a Sanskrit name? Even if I take this argument that 90% of Sanskrit words have Tamil origin then will you pl enlighten how despite being non Indian Sanskrit did had such origin for max words. Where the Tamils of those days sending packets of words to Europe with Pegion?

[@gloriouspurpose4532]

@@acharya8959 sanskrit not even a language brother! Adi tamil letters are found in indus valley civilization area. Sanskrit is only a mixture of languages. Tamil has many synonyms for a single word. Tamil can speaked fluently and beautifully without your sanskirit.

[@mithun3313]

@@acharya8959 Pls do know to use google.. dna findings from harappan civilisation matches with todays south indian population.. which proves aryan immigration.. plus sanskrit is a combination of languages from devanagiri script.. u guys just always wanted to bring our history down since we have not got much evidences because its too old.. we lost it.. yeah thats because of several several invasions.. we people are so innocent and pity is we believed aryan stories.. thats why starting from bcci till last govt table aryans are holding powers..😏

[@jennyjames2673]

@@gloriouspurpose4532 lol stfu you are glorifying your own sh*t language

[@snehanath1705]

@@gloriouspurpose4532 From where did u get this information....

[@akbrahma7739]

You missed a major group, the mongoloid or turanian people who settled in north east and mixed with aryans to form the Bengali and Assamese people, or is it that you believe they are non Indians?

[@User360iskon]

Ankur Brahma thats wht i was trying to say bro. NE has a different past. Mon khmer austrics and asiastric austric(andamese) migrated as cave man and den tibeto burman groups like meitei, bodo kachari, naga etc. Den the indo aryans and den tai groups.

[@User360iskon]

TTP JFK dose were Tai ahoms who were frm yunan,china. Dey came in 1228 AD and made the assamese community

[@hnb193]

Ankur Brahma Not plain Mongoloid among Assamese. Tibeto Burman (Kacharis Karbi etc) plus Austric (Garo, Khasi) initially and a later mixture from Aryans (Brahmins, Kalitas) and Thais (Ahoms). Even Dravidian ancestry(Fishing community). I doubt Bengalis have such diverse genes as Assamese have.

[@omfriend]

motownphenom you black

[@omfriend]

Ankur Brahma yeah resisted mughal and converted to Christianity...u may be god damn proud of that too right? except for Assam all of you are converts...

[@nilaypatel6770]

Basically, First Human Was Started Migrating from Africa Before 2 Lakh Years, We human still Migrating.. But, Skin Colour and Face Structure changes according to Weather & Food & Mixing of jeans,

[@65gregw]

:-):-):-) I understand this is a joke?

[@patil155]

Jeans?

[@kon.kartik]

Jeans👖😂

[@Infinitesoul091]

Ya especially levis affects face structure

[@foodreligion78]

Most of the south Indians are non vegetarians so they are very peaceful , tolerant and inclusive people, if you have any doubts come and spend in south, feel the difference .

[@AruntamizhSentamizh]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mqfSfIuueMR0kMUsi=FFUB3V8d-O1JDaBL 🙏🙏🪔🪔🪔🪔🪔🪔

[@tamobiswas6083]

New evidences found which completely dismantles this theory ( or some part of it ). The ancient swords and chariots found in archeological sites of sinauli dates back to 2000 - 1800 BCE which is of the same time of Indus Valley civilization. Also the way the people were buried there shares much similarity to the vedic culture, unlike the Indus Valley civilization thus confirming that there was a parallel civilization in sinauli which was predominantly vedic. This makes the assumption that Indus Valley civilization is the only ancestor is not correct

[@anon21qwerty17]

lol, 2000-1500 bc, aryan migration/invasion had happened. and original aryans buried their dead the same way as in this site. find out the same way of burial in ukraine and surrounding countries. it was aasi who burned their dead and aryan, to integrate themselves, used it. also dna studies are still not out from this site.

[@kapilr.4768]

No buried artifact can deny DNA evidence.

[@ayushdhingra855]

​@@kapilr.4768lot of research paper against dna evidanve

[@Kumark-qf1mk]

What the hell . Why so much anger? It is true. INDIANS ARE MIXED RACE. Full stop.

[@Kumark-qf1mk]

I don’t think you deserve a reply mate.

[@Mdavis12002]

Just like Hispanics/Latin people

[@anilbiz8921]

Bravo..Let's think and behave as Indians first and also as universal human beings.India has been the most tolerant place and people who gave refuge to all persecuted people. Let's not loose this quality that makes this nation great. It will surely rise again

[@fin3420]

Kush k ...people now a days dont need reason to hate each other. Animals are so much better than hate filled humans.

[@NisCho754]

kush k bro your answer to this @Sainath Kadam was perfect, insulting someone’s mother shows that this guy certainly doesn’t come from a family with good background...

[@ChindiChitranna]

Initial assumption itself is illogical. This is very unscientific.

[@krishnamohan2351]

ChindiChitranna Ok Mr.Scientific, will the research be more scientific if it agrees with your opinions?

[@jansprat4649]

Please ignore the nonsense/extrapolations of this "study". Its one thing to talk about DNA to show possible human migrations and another thing to talk about DNA showing cultural migrations. Cultures don't just migrate without leaving any imprint. Where does it say in any of the ancient Indian texts that the people came from another place? Where does it say in any place in the middle-east or central asia that their ancestors practiced Vedic culture and that they migrated east? Why is not possible that people settled in India for 1000s of years and developed the Indian culture within India? According to the out of Africa theory, everyone in India came from someplace else with the first wave starting around 40000 years ago. Secondly, How many skeletons are found at these Indus valley sites so far? Around 200 skeletons. Just a few 100 out of the 1000,000s of people who lived there through the centuries. So we cannot even be sure if these skeletons belonged to the people of Indus valley or these are people who migrated to the region and practiced burying their dead. The Zoroastrians for example have "Towers of silence" in Mumbai where they used to let the dead be fed to the birds. The original inhabitants of Indus valley may have practiced cremation. Its also possible that these people who are buried may have come centuries AFTER the original Indus civilization was established and hence these skeletons at Rakhigrahi may not be even be that of the original people of Indus valley. All evidence points to traders with families traveling to India from places like Egypt and Arabia 1000s of years ago, even during the heights of Egyptian civilization around 4000 BC. They would travel by sea catching the monsoon winds. As a thought experiment, If we were to make the the entire population of India disappear and then some scientists centuries later come across the few cemeteries of Dutch and Portuguese settlers in India, would it be sensible to say that the original people of India were Dutch and Portuguese just because of a few graves found?? And would that somehow prove that they brought the Vedic culture to India??? Thirdly, migration of people doesn't mean migration of cultures. Just because they found a few families of Brahmins in North India whose DNA has "higher steppe ancestry" of central Asians, doesn't mean that the people of central Asia brought the Vedic culture!! What about the Brahmins of the rest of the country??? For hundreds of years, we had people of central Asia come and settle in India. All those Delhi Sultans were from Central Asia and so were their large armies. It is entirely possible that these central Asians settled in India and their descendants intermarried into Brahmins families just like a lot of people converted to Islam through marriage. In fact that's how Islam slowly started to spread in India as people married their children to Muslim traders. And it was not just unidirectional as people were switching between religions as they saw fit. If they wanted to work for a Muslim king they would convert to Islam or if they wanted to work for a Hindu king, they converted to Hindus. For example there are entire families of Rajputs in which half of the members were Hindus and half were Muslims all dining at the same table!! Its a disease of the western mind to claim that an entire cultures MUST come from someplace else typically brought from the west as if the rest of the world were sitting around twiddling their thumbs for westerners to show up. This is complete nonsense. In fact when India was a wealthy subcontinent, the westerners believed that their ancestors came from India!! It was a matter of pride at the time and they had at that time "proved" that their ancestors migrated into Europe from India. Remember that Europeans were flocking into India in droves around 1500 AD because of India's wealth of Gold, Diamonds etc. India was in fact the most wealthiest nation on earth for nearly 2000 years till 1750s when the British started their plunder. After the large scale looting and India started sliding into poverty, suddenly the direction of ancestry story changed. Now it was the whites who brought civilization to India!!! Finally, the DNA of the people of the Indian subcontinent is 90% the same. Even Jinnah's ancestors were Hindus for example. There will be minor differences here and there but 90% of the DNA matches through most of the population of India excepting those in truly remote places like Andaman etc.

[@paharipant2]

Jan Sprat exactly, it's one thing to study DNA samples and another to draw conclusions from it. Seems like some really far fetched theories are being concocted in this video and presented as facts.

[@anilsep27]

Following are the reasons why Aryan Invasion/Migration Theory is True. And I find nothing wrong in it. Entire Human History has always been like that. Sanskrit never originated in India. It belongs to Indo European Language. It was brought from outside invaders, that is the reason why Indus Valley Civilization scripts are still not deciphered.Sanskrit was first recorded in inscriptions found not on the plains of India but in in what is now northern Syria. DNA analysis clearly indicate that most of the North Indians & Brahmins in entire India are genetically more closely related to middle east people. The oldest haplogroup in India were O2a, found among the Austroasiatic peoples. Haplogroup H with Dravidians invaded O2a. And finally the Indo-Europeans haplogroup R invaded Dravidians. The north Indians has more Caucasoid and the south Indians more australoid in their genetics. Most of the North Indians burn the dead bodies traditionally whereas Indus Valley people clearly followed burial systems. This indicates that they are different from present people of North India. Indus Valley people had constructed their drainage system on very scientific lines. Whereas so called Aryans have followed “Defecating in open system”. That is the reason even today nearly 50% Indians don’t have toilets.

[@anuragchandra7838]

ChindiChitranna You are right. Study has to be done in the context of entire human migration with accounting of chronological relations in the DNA. For example if two people are related then we must know how they are related are they siblings or mother and daughter. Such a study has been done, results were published about 11 years ago. Details appeared in most European news paper. Certainly appeared in Russian ones, but magically completely missing in India. It was a sample of entire worlds population, virtually every tribe in the world. It proved conclusively that the all indo European people and even the Eastern ones ie Japanese etc originate from north India. The results were summarized in a Book by New York Times author: “before the Dawn: recovering the lost history of our ancestors” by Nicholas Wade. It has all the scientific references. Saying that people of Iran and India are related isn’t enough, correct analysis shows which direction the migration happened and it shows that it happened 40000 years ago from north India out of khyber pass to Iran then onto Europe.

[@ladygoddess9360]

I am from 1660's settlers in New England Upper state NY - American "viking" Western European mixture and my mom Canadian from similar european backgrounds, but my mom has southern European Crete Greek Italian. I needed to amend my previous comment. I have like 1 segment of what I mentioned below and many Asia- chinese +++ of similar amounts going way back. What makes sense is the silk road trading and/or the Yaminia tribes plus Beber and a few other tribes connected to us traces of indoeuropean heritage.

[@nishajaihindajain9192]

In Tamil literature there is mention of a poet describing the beauty of a girl comparing her wide face with the wide roads , citties and other structures which shows the urban culture they followed . Indus valley is also a urban culture who were very educated , knew everything about technology.

[@idontusecryptocurrency5870]

Obviously everybody knows that indus valley people hd their own civilisation.They hv written language sewage system cities etc.But i dont know what u want to prove by saying that

[@rishtemeintohhumtumharebaa4181]

🤦 All India was urbanized. So no doubt even in Tamil Nadu, there were civilized people. That doesn't mean they were different.

[@SenthilKumar-gz1ll]

indus valley = tamil civilization

[@manojmadhavan294]

@@rishtemeintohhumtumharebaa4181 she says ancient civilizations in indus is Tamil...before Aryans came ..whole land is Tamil family...that is also said by ambedkar

[@rishtemeintohhumtumharebaa4181]

@@manojmadhavan294 Lol Even the oldest literature of Tamils i.e Sangam Literature mentions Cholas as Aryas. And regarding Ambedkar. He himself considered as Aryan. Saying rubbish things like Shudra originated from Emperor Sudas. But his opinion doesn't matter.

[@MrPankajnautiyal]

He started with probably and ended with confirmed... Wow.

[@AbhishekSharma-ce2lh]

These kind of clown are two clues ... their grandparents were greedy of prosperity and money. They wanted to be prosperous like brahmin, priest .so they joined Christianity and became pastors of base less religion.. but still useless..

[@nirwantomar1238]

I think you haven't listened to the first 5 second of this video, 902 people research team have come to this conclusion. Not this guy😀

[@AbhishekSharma-ce2lh]

@@balakumart562 wait and watch for the revival of ancient technology of india ...

[@ChetanSharma-gw5lg]

Probably he is an alien. Like and confirm 902 people.

[@anurag23611]

It's still a very misleading and inaccurate video. Nothing is confirmed just because he said it's confirmed.

[@sharann3482]

The comment section is really funny to read One sight is suggesting that this video (wich is based on a pre-reviewed study) is too pro South Indians and its (study) mentioning that the North Indians have “Aryan“ DNA and south Asian DNA, makes it for that site somehow a fake scientific paper. Than we have this other site that is triggered by the fact that their ancestors were Hunters and gatherers and was the Civilization who builded the Indus Valley Civilization. They also say it’s a too pro North Indian video/study. So they conclude that this study has to be fake as well. Than there’s a group wich is triggered that not all of their ancestors was mentioned (in my opinion understandable) but they than also reject the study. Than the funniest group whose complete world view breaks down in seconds just because the Aryan Migration theory has quint essence of truth. And the last group the reasoners who knows what a pre-reviewed study is and how difficult it is in our scientific world to have a fake paper surviving. Listen you can criticize the paper no question but if you want to disprove it you have to do your own research, Wright a paper, pre- reviewed it, publish it and get famous (well atleast among Indians for sure).

[@adityanawani8134]

Sharann Where are you from?

[@sharann3482]

aditya nawani from Germany

[@adityanawani8134]

Sharann Do you think AIT or AMT is true?

[@sharann3482]

aditya nawani AMT

[@adityanawani8134]

Sharann Why?

[@NativeVsColonial]

"The Veda was the most precious gift for which the West had ever been indebted to the East" - Voltaire

[@DilipSadh]

Fake new.. Veda only mention Sapt Sindhu No other land at all

[@NativeVsColonial]

@@DilipSadh Stop denying the facts, this is not your Whatsapp forward, and if you get some time from ignorance, then seek some education and factual knowledge

[@DilipSadh]

@@NativeVsColonial Dr Ambedkar himself denied any Aryan or outside origin of Veda in his book " Who were the Shudra". Show me any proof that VEDA's refer to any land out side of SaptSindhu ?

[@DilipSadh]

@@NativeVsColonial Dr David Reich ( Head of Genetics at Harvard ) who also led Rakhi Garhi (Harappan site) Genetic study. Read his full interview as below economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/indus-valley-civilisation-is-largest-source-of-ancestry-for-south-asians/articleshow/71042072.cms?from=mdr - Dr David said "All South Asians are Genetic descendent of IVC (Harappan)" - Dr David said "there is NO Archaeological evidence of any civilization like IVC in Central Asia at that time" - Dr David said " He does not know what is Aryan"

[@NativeVsColonial]

@@DilipSadh Bro I think you've mis understood the quote, Th quote in Hindi: "वेद सबसे कीमती उपहार था जिसके लिए पश्चिम कभी भी पूरब का ऋणी रहा था" And yes Aryan migration theory has already been debunked, I don't believe in theories.

[@whosright21]

The unfortunate part about selecting names like Ancestral North Indian (ANI) and Ancestral South Indian (ASI) to divide the population of India into two groups is that it hides the fact that all Indians are a mix of both ANI and ASI. In actual fact there is no such genetic demarcating line between north Indian IE (Indo European) speakers and south Indian “Dravidian” language speakers. When we look at the original scientific publication in which ASI and ANI were defined (David Reich et al., “Reconstructing Indian Population History”, Nature, 2009) we find that the population selection to represent 1 billion plus Indians is very narrow and biased. Out of 132 samples more than 80% were from Tribes and the rest from Brahmins or other forward castes.

[@GrandAncientOak]

Why does it have to divide? It doesn’t have to. It’s a term used to describe a group of people. India is WAY too resilient and strong to fall to such a silly division.

[@kaushiksaikadali7460]

@@GrandAncientOak the division occurs because of geographical factors. We all know the Vindhyas were like the bisecting ranges of the peninsula, the area directly below the ranges still happens to be thick jungles and plateaus. It's no surprise that the same people developed differently in north and south. Doesn't make it as a separation, but a difference of development due to the gap in between these areas. That however doesn't prevent rulers to stretch from North to South, just that the local populace didn't have a lot of mix. That's the reason modern Bihari and a modern Telugu look different, but have mostly the same features because they're from the same people 4 millennia ago.

[@user-uh9bl6lg8w]

Arya means teacher in sanskrit, example arya bhatt the mathematician who invented zero India and subcontinent and former Soviet union area has connection of migration, therefore indo European languages are related but aryan superior and inferior race theory was coined by western colonists In nazi era with wrong and raccistt intentionss

[@TruthSeeker69921]

Whatever in sanskrit is aryan's making.. they were invaders with horses came to north india.. they created sanskrit, vedic system, caste system by making themselves as brahmins of the highest hierarchy.. the true indigenous ppl are the dravidians(tamils) likely originated from harappa civilisation at the lost river of sarawathy.. there is even an ancient tamil city of Harappa in pakistan.. u guys can google and see.. but indian government is covering up because mostly are aryans and they will nvr acknowledge tamil as the oldest spoken language in the world.. soon links to indus pictograph are being decrypted using spoken Tamil.. incredible breakthrough.. that would bring back glory to Tamils whom were suppressed by the aryans for centuries till today.. so dont believe onto whatever the aryans made.. they are the crook brahmins plundered india's wealth and followed by british.. the original proto-shiva seal found in harappa civilisation in a meditative state can be directly linked to south india... incredibly the harappa civilisation emphasised on drainage system, fertility, equility, animal rights, self and social well being plus also meditation.. all these with emphasise to water can be seen in our Tamil culture.. the aryan's are from mesopotamian blood where they believed in gods, kings, pyramids, zigurats, temples, hierarchy totally different from harappa civilisation where there was not even weapons or war.. that is the ultimate shiva's teaching brought over by the dravidians to south india.. aryan mixed and destroyed most of the authentic Tamil teachings.. by right dravidians dont even pray during their civilisation, they only meditate because they have already came to realisation thousands of years ago.. om namah shivaya

[@TruthSeeker69921]

@GOUTHAM KRISHNA Shiva worship has pre-Vedic origins. Please see my explanation below. The Vedic period is considered to be around 1500-600 BCE, around the time of the composition of the four sacred Vedic texts (Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samaveda, and Atharvaveda). And we have evidence that Shiva worship and yoga predates this period. The Pashupati seal (dated around 2350-2000 BC), discovered in the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC; a pre-Vedic period) shows the figure of yogi sitting in the yogic lotus posture. This figures is considered to be Shiva by many scholars. John Marshall gives the following reasons why he considers this figure to be Shiva: “My reasons for the identification are four. In the first place the figure has three faces and that Siva was portrayed with three as well as with more usual five faces, there are abundant examples to prove. Secondly, the head is crowned with the horns of a bull and the trisula are characteristic emblems of Siva. Thirdly, the figure is in a typical yoga attitude, and Siva was and still is, regarded as a mahayogi-the prince of Yogis. Fourthly, he is surrounded by animals, and Siva is par excellence the "Lord of Animals" (Pasupati)-of the wild animals of the jungle, according to the Vedic meaning of the word pasu, no less than that of domesticated cattle.” There are also other similar seals of Shiva found in the IVC. There are also Shivalingas found in the IVC (3500 BCE to 2300 BCE). Mother Goddess worship was also prominent in IVC. There is no evidence of Sanskrit or Vedas having existed in the IVC, as the Indus valley script has nothing to do with Sanskrit. Dhyansky (1987) discusses about yoga existing in the Indus Valley Civilization. Harappa, which is one of the sites when IVC excavations were found and whose name comes from the nearby village, can be split into “Hara” (another name for Shiva) and “appa” (meaning father in some South Indian languages) [book: Tantra, its mystic and scientific basis]. Also, some scholars have said that prehistoric paintings at the Bhimbetka rock shelters (dated pre-10,000 BCE period) shows figures of Shiva dancing, Shiva's trident, and his mount Nandi. These are good evidences showing that both yoga and Shiva worship existed in the pre-Vedic period. Shiva in the yogic tradition is seen as the first yogi, Adiyogi, who taught the yogic sciences over 15,000 years back. Shiva and Shakti are also closely associated with Tantra. Although we cannot be sure, Shiva’s inclusion into the Vedic fold may not have been very smooth. Although Shiva was a prominent deity well before the Vedic period, he is only a minor deity called Rudra in the Rigveda, which is the oldest Veda. He is mainly seen as a god of anger, destruction, death, and feared most.Rig Veda 7.21.5 and 10.99.3 shows the Vedic people being against Phallus (Lingam) worshippers. The Puranic story of Daksha (father of Sati) insulting Shiva and calling him Vedabahya (which means ‘outside the Vedas’) have led to some scholars indicating that Shiva worship happened among the non-Vedic tribes. It is only in the later Vedas, and in the Svetasvatara Upanishad, that Shiva was elevated to the status of Brahman. All this suggests that the integration of Shiva into the Vedic pantheon may not have been very smooth.

[@nerinavshrestha3338]

Indus valley civilization found in Harappa and Mohenjo Daro May have been just the tip of the iceberg. There are other potentially older remnants of lost civilization of proto-indus culture in the Himalayan foothills waiting to be unearthed. In most of north India, the remnants has been totally eradicated due to population pressure.

[@TheMidnightClub10]

And due to countless invasions in Afghanistan Pakistan Sindh too bro Include this too that's why we have European Greek Persian dna and facial look immigratiin trade settlings were common like Hungarians they were Huns Asians not European that's why Austria Hungary Germans we're proud of their ancestory........

[@sakethvelikanti178]

@Thracian Princess stfu.... You fucking ripped off Atlantis from our old hindu mythos...and you dare call us worshipping Poseidon?

[@buteos8632]

my home world lol do you know who is not proud of their ancestry?

[@buteos8632]

Thracian Princess 😆

[@buteos8632]

Saketh Velikanti take it easy, if it's that easy to piss you off you come as a weak person. she's not right, but she's just another victim of ignorance like you! have some respect for yourself and others

[@karimrohie9245]

The Modern Iranians and Eastern Iranians ( Tajiks, Pashtoons, Pamirians) who are believed to be directly connected with ancient Aryans have different features as Compared with North and South Indians rather they have more features that closely resembles with Europeans, but some ethnic tribes in the Hindukush, karakoram and Himalyan regions posses traits that closely resembles with the Indians normally they are Dards who speak Shina, Kohwar, Kelashya and Torwali languages in which we can find words of Sansikrit

[@ManabDasiammanab]

Pashtun are Persianised Central Asians and aren’t really related to Aryans. It’s Iranians and Higher Caste Hindus and Dards who are closest to Aryans. But some higher castes Hindus aren’t Aryans either like the Jatts who are Aryanized Scythians and Ahoms who are Aryanized Tibeto-Burmese people.

[@sarmadsardar2218]

The People speaking Khowar and some other people living in valleys in North are considered to be the descendents of soldiers who stayed and setteled in those mountain valleys after Alexander invasion. And DNA studies also suggest that they resemble Macedonian greeks.

[@johnsmith-oo9tl]

​@@ManabDasiammanabjatts being Scythian is the biggest joke of the century . Jatts look no different to your Indian, they barely have any colored eyes , it's extremely rare . The descendants of scyhtians i.e. sakas or askazoi / askuzai are the eastern iranian people living in south central Asia like the pashtuns , tajiks etc . Heck, the scyhtians are a eastern Iranian people unlike jatts who are Indo Aryan Punjabis.

[@ABO-Destiny]

@@ManabDasiammanab But aren't Scythians the predecessor to Aryans? It shows in genetic marker too if what you say about Jats are true. Aryans and aryanic hindus have larger percentage of R1a genetic marker and r1a and r1b is shared by eastern europeans and western europeans respectively, however both r1a and r1b descended from r1 and jats do have higher percentage of r1 genetic marker in them.

[@explorerelka]

"The Scholars did not have DNA samples from the Indus Valley Civilization, but they did take samples from individuals who SEEMED like they were PROBABLY from there". And we Indians are supposed to take this assumption as scientific evidence of our own origins? The Aryan Invasion theory itself is long debunked. When are we Indians going to have our own World class institutions that studies ancient history, archaeology, ethnology, anthropology in a scientific manner? This would've been the most logical thing in an ancient civilisation such as ours.

[@MM-dh3wr]

True history is coming soon with evidence; History has been changed from Guptas period; PURANAS were created to hide the history. Kashmir issue is making us disprove aryan invasion theory. Everything is written down and things are streamlined now. AIT is debunked by 5% people.

[@azadpathak7895]

@@MM-dh3wr AIT is disapproved by more than 1 billion people in India. It's already 14.29% of the world. 😂😂

[@MM-dh3wr]

@@azadpathak7895 only 4% of Indians; second TRUTH is an invariant and not to be based on voting; but by evidence; You know People supported AIT in the beginning and after Kashmir issue came they switched sides. Just for political reasoning AIT is being invalidated based on votes from selected groups. TRUTH shall make you free. ARYANS have a history of changing documents; All the puranas were just created for that purpose. 1. Changed the Buddhists documents Damma Pada(Brahmin kills parents they can go sin free) 2. Talmud in TORA 3. Brahamhathi dosha, Chathur Varna(in GITA), Purusha sukhta(in VEDA) all inserted to control the population.

[@azadpathak7895]

@@MM-dh3wr kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z5PWqpxqr757hpI Go watch. Spend some time. Don't argue unnecessarily. Don't spread hate about us. There's nothing like North or South Indian. We are one, united and we have a history which is the greatest and it is only ours. No AIT for us and for truth.

[@MM-dh3wr]

@@azadpathak7895 we follow the TRUTH and don't make the TRUTH follow our opinion. That is not TRUTH.

[@JayantRaut]

*I don't believe in aayran invasion theory, and I am from North India! 🤔🤨😐*

[@vm4992]

I only believe in Vedic supremacy

[@himeshraj11]

@@vm4992 I think Vedas are shitty*

[@himeshraj11]

@Saira ShamsiAlmost all scripts are already analysed (Except indus valley script).

[@arun1math]

he didnt peak about aryan invasion he said about aryan migration

[@kollurubharathsimha539]

​@@arun1mathat first it's inavsion then it's debunked so it's migration now what picnic theory 😂😂😂😂. I still have one doubt is they bring Vedas and sanskrit . How the hell did write about river Saraswathi which was exactly dried up at same time they came or before . Like they have seen its prime age . There are lots of questions arise . At same time period the zebu breed bulls are migrated to Egypt and Iran exactly at 4200ya . What about yamnaya tribe they literally slaughtered western tribe . Which is actually at 4500ya u know what their dna match with ours but when they messacred they attacked only men and male children . Those dna does not match with instead match with pure western . Yamnaya charraiot style can be seen in sunauli archeological stie how did this happen . If they attacked with bronze sword how did they defeat Indigenous people who are equipped with iron swords which is found in tamil site dates to 4200years

[@sateeshpatil5298]

I'm South Indian... Please forget about ancestry... Now all Indians should unite... North to south east to west we are all one now...jai hind jai Karnataka mate..

[@thisisshiv8180]

Lol

[@johnjacobastoriv688]

we will make islammukt bharat

[@anj6958]

Patil?

[@Kratos9407]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/rauln2OJlrl-ibM

[@manzurelahi4873]

Madrasi

[@shifujikafan3720]

I am a half Bengali and Bihari from mother(born in Jharkhand) Bihari from my father(Born in Bihar). Living Delhi going to marry a South Indian

[@anchitatrya2747]

Salman Khan is Bengali??

[@shifujikafan3720]

@@anchitatrya2747 arey fake account hai

[@anchitatrya2747]

@@shifujikafan3720 ik I was being sarcastic

[@dharshancs7457]

Finally sallu bhai is getting married....

[@shifujikafan3720]

@@dharshancs7457 arrey fake account hai

[@titankkc3820]

INDIA is a mixture of:-Dravidians, Aryans, phastoons, Persians, Native Tribes, Han Chinese, maingolia blood, Turks, Anglo Indians and many more. We all divided by religion but We cannot get separate from our Ancestors. 😊😊. If anyone got doubt take a DNA test you will be amazed to see your blood line 👏👏👏😘

[@Tiraskaar]

Okay peeps here is what i know and I'm writing this before watching the video. There are something called Haplogroups. These are basically genes passed down from father to son and mothers to daughters. The male ones are in the y chromosome and the female ones are the mitochondrial Haplogroups. This genetic information varies greatly because as the migration from Africa started , mutation in genes started happening as well, also to take into consideration, there are evidence of different kinds of human intermixing like with the Neanderthals. This Haplogroup, majorly in males, helps us to understand where our ancestry comes from, but it doesn't defines our race or ethnicity at all since it contains the information from a single line of fathers. So basically it gives a a rough image of single line of our ancestors. In India the majority of people have the same DNA which a result of primarily the admixture of three ethnicities, first the Indo Europeans hunters, the Yamnaya people which came from the steppe also know as steppe pastrolists, the Iranian farmers/agriculturists group which came from Iran obviously, and the third is the earliest tribal groups of India the Andaman and Nicobar island people which came from the first Migration from Africa. We are basically the mixture of these 3 and many other minority groups. The Haplogroups of the Steppe pastoralists are of r1a and r1b type also called the aryan gene. Similarly the Iranians and the Andaman Nicobar island people also have distinct Haplogroups. The Haplogroups may tell us about where our fatherly lineage came from but again it doesn't defines our race or ethnicity in any way. The majority of Indians share the same DNA with very very miniscule difference, this difference being the difference in the percentage of the 3 major ethnic group we come from.

[@rumadhakacitygirlusa3471]

Wow 😮 so what my late grandparents told me about forefathers is true ! My forefathers entered Bengal in 1400s from Afghanistan and Tajikistan as mercenaries ! As recorded in old family documents in Farsi .

[@Paul-nr6nm]

You can trace your ancestry that far back? You really got a lot of history

[@vishwarao6064]

The timelines are extremely different

[@AA-kx9jb]

Nothing to do with this video. These are ancient mixes not something 500 years ago. If u want the truth go do AncestryDNA and it will reveal if u have any tajik or afghan. A lot of indians also day this but dna tests showed otherwise.

[@walnut9472]

Lol As far as recorded My Ancestors Started from Ramnagar J&K,He was Minister in court of a king (idk how many centuries ago),There was disagreement between he and king and he knew next day we'll be Killed so he Fled to Nurpur near Kangra,Himachal Pradesh and donated land to Arya Samaj ,one of the brother still lived there and didn't Migrated. Fast-forward to my Great Grandfather ,He worked in Bank in Lahore after doing LLB But he had Cataract (I guess) and thus he was decommissioned and then moved to Amritsar (Before independence) ,His 3 sons including my grandfather moved to 3 different places One moved to Shimla and other Chandigarh while my grandfather moved to Kathua, J&K

[@mokhan8832]

My Pathan ancestors migrated to Bihar in 1500’s according to 23 and Me DNA test. It makes sense where my family got the name Khan from.

[@randomclips7367]

They don't have DNA sample from Indus valley people but they ha've taken sample from people who likes people from Indus valley people...funny..haan

[@kamartaj3010]

Random Clips Rakhigarhi skeleton doesn't matched with uppercaste. They matched with lowercaste and aouth indians. Loser truth has exposed you Aryans infilterator

[@gauravs5529]

Ucchta ki lucchta hi Brahmanwad hai they didn't match with Aryan they were not tested with brahmins Check your DNA it may be possible that it is aryan. Because Andheri Rat me diya tere hat me

[@duffybrute]

They took samples from Gonur teppe site, Shahr e Shokta site, Saidu sarif site in swat. These all are Bronze age sites from North Western south asia. So yes the research is still valid.

[@scoopidiboopz77z26]

the DNA study of a 4500-year-old skeleton found in Rakhigarhi, in Haryana, suggests that modern people in India are likely to have descended from the same population. These path-breaking insights came to light after scientists were able to sequence genome from the skeleton of a woman and study the archaeological evidence found in Rakhigarhi, a village located some 150 kilometers from Delhi. Rakhigarhi is the largest Harappan site in India.

[@doityourselfpakistan6535]

The results have persian dna in rakhugarhi mixed with south indian dravdian dna . So the aryan theory is not correct , perisns were called arya btw

[@kanjanarcoticmadeusfallbra9702]

Aryan migration Asian migration European migration occurred during post indus valley civilization

[@manish7897]

​@@kanjanarcoticmadeusfallbra9702ilaj kara le 😂😂

[@kuttycreations1960]

In south asia. who are more dark, they have most south asian hunter gatherer genome. who are white, they have most aryan steppe pastoralist genome .

[@ncxdf1277]

*Proud to be descended from Dravidians/Indian aboriginals😍😍* who are creators of Indus Valley civilisation. Dravida Nadu💪🏽

[@ncxdf1277]

@Surya Yeah that’s like Mexicans being proud of their Spanish ancestors💀

[@govindnarasimman6819]

studying similarity in genes and drawing conclusions based on assumptions from similarity are different. The assumption of step-pastoralists from europe relays on DNA similarity. they will be similar if at all it was reverse migration. and linguistically southern languages are more connected to indigenous northern languages. I notice that though by large there is some kind of division in color of skin(debatable because of tones.) There are only countable indians with different hair and nail color. entire europe is diverse in HAIR EYE and NAIL color.

[@Kratos9407]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/rauln2OJlrl-ibM .

[@kanjanarcoticmadeusfallbra9702]

Aryan migration of Vedic brahmins from Persia to India in around 700 bce.

[@abhinnakhale7520]

Tum scroll wale apni aukat bta hi dete ho

[@anybody9059]

Abhinna Khale yes true this vdo is fake science propogandist with Political agenda plz report this channel

[@amit3230]

Apne bilkul sahi bola.. Iss channel unsubscribe karo aur not interested kar do... Ye log galat bata rahe hai

[@vishaln1903]

Report this video instead of complaining. Take this misconception down

[@arjunbatra2072]

Ye bhn ke lode south indian in kaamo mein zyada aage rehte hain jahab bh apne ancient culture ki besti krni ho ye madrchod hote hain waha....warna north mein bss mulle hain bhassad machane ko...baki hindu thode aware hain in sb cheezo ke barre mein

[@anybody9059]

Arjun Batra ....half right All indians be south or north respect Indian culture......Indian culture ki beizzati South Indian ke naam pe Leftist,.madrasa chhap ,aur missionary agenda wale karte hai ....in logoko pure south indian logoka representative na samajhana

[@zionthestarofyoutube9961]

This is just this man's Opinion and not the fact.

[@bikramlama.changba836]

Thank you for making clear within this short video.

[@josephjohn5864]

Thank you for the study and report and for the large comments. One thing is certain people are all interested about their past. Study the past you will know the future is an international law. If we do not compromise with the past why there is so many divisions of caste systems cultural differences and religious barriers. Our mind and soul must compromise all humans are one and the same.

[@Kratos9407]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/rauln2OJlrl-ibM

[@sudhirkursange9571]

There is no such thing as Aryan migration to Indus valley

[@maranmicro]

This is a good effort of arriving to the question from the answer! Pls do not propagate incomplete research!

[@NannyMAU]

Original people were dark skinned African descendants

[@mnshahab3857]

I saw Owaisi on Aaj Tak saying it's the Brahmins the upper caste Hindu who are foriegners. India is a mixed race. But saying a certain community is not Indian because of their belief is totally wrong and hateful.

[@VanaeCavae]

Fuck owaisi.

[@sanjaykh1926]

Bora 60 % in india are bramhins....but some are converted some of including muslim-christian community....if bramhins left India..nothing left in India....

[@NativeVsColonial]

@@sanjaykh1926 haha chutiye HINDU dharm main hota hai bramhins are the people who destroying Hindu religion by still following and worshipping cast system.

[@keralanaturelover196]

Brahmins were first cheaters who created castism. Forward non brahmins more bad.

[@muktamalakar5771]

@@NativeVsColonial Wow, the greatest truth ever said brother. You are right, the only people killing Hinduism are castist Brahmins. Get out of casteism my Hindu brothers.

[@utkarshrana8763]

Your ancestors won't come to help you when you fight among your brothers, live peacefully these things don't matter in your life. Cling to the past and make your life hell.

[@dr.doctor2620]

but these studies show us our identities. clinging to pasy is not bad, all of your memory is of your past as well right? even your name was kept in past, if you shouldnt cling to the past then why not reject our names as well since they are from the past? every thing you learn; science, maths etc. is also past then why not forget them as well? see what i am trying to say is that past is important. we shouldnt forget our past however bad it may be. our past determines our future and future becomes past as well. and what is bad in knowing our past? all of this tells us who we are, why shouldnt we know this?

[@utkarshrana8763]

@@dr.doctor2620 I did not mean to downgrade the past. Its gives a lesson worth remembering but what few people are trying these days are dividing the society and its delicate fabrication of culture by sowing Hatred among all of us.

[@utkarshrana8763]

And I am just Against that And that's why I said whence you fight among your brothers. Its a sole property of Indians that they hate other Indian much more than any other nation in the world

[@dr.doctor2620]

i hope i wasnt rude. you should convey your messages more clearly, it is best to have least ambiguity right?

[@utkarshrana8763]

@@dr.doctor2620 yes, but Nowadays I really don't bother to Write because people with senseless ideological pride never come up for a proper healthy Debate. They just want to hear "u r correct "

[@KingAeetes]

Short and Sweet ... and Extremely Well Done!

[@DilipSadh]

Dr David Reich ( Head of Genetics at Harvard ) who also led Rakhi Garhi (Harappan site) Genetic study . Read his full interview as below economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/indus-valley-civilisation-is-largest-source-of-ancestry-for-south-asians/articleshow/71042072.cms?from=mdr - Dr David said "All South Asians are Genetic descendent of IVC (Harappan)" - Dr David said "there is NO Archaeological evidence of any civilization like IVC in Central Asia at that time" - Dr David said " He does not know what is Aryan"

[@DilipSadh]

@roh hit yes this is a likely scenario actually.

[@madarauchihaandromeda]

As an Indian, I'll tell you honestly, this Hunter-Gatherer DNA is what make many of us look fugly. Iranian and Aryan look always good

[@alani3992]

Yes its the Austroloid genes, as some people in South India look similar to Australian aborigines. In North India it is also mixed in.

[@madarauchihaandromeda]

@@alani3992 Yes and Pakistanis have also, but less, and Afghans even less. Even less you have These Austroloid genes, that much you will Look better!

[@cprakashkumar6205]

The recent findings in keeladai, tamil Nadu reveals an urban civilization which was more than 300 years older than Hindus valley civilization.they even find writings inscriptions in household materials used by them which contains names of females individual of that time it was written in ancient tamil.so South Indians as hunters and gathers theory is fully destroyed by the recent findings. They even found urban settlements and ancient steel factories and a graveyard near that area.

[@greaterbharat4175]

​@@cprakashkumar6205keeladi is old like 600bce ( as par what I found in internet) 2600 year old only , you can provide me research paper what you read and telling us here

[@cprakashkumar6205]

@@greaterbharat4175 your talking about findings before the four phase excavation of keeladi site.During the fourth phase they found a pot of rice which carbon dated to 3500 years to 4000 years. It proved it existed during the Indus valley civilization period .But after the fifth phase and seventh phase it is proved older ,sadly the media didn't cover it due to a political agenda ( not a single evidence was found about deities or religion or any sign of worship). Yeah there is evidence but I don't want to spoil it for u because it will spoil your joy when u find it yourself.

[@kamalkhan5305]

The original inhabitants of South Asia were the hunter gatherers who may be the ancestors of the Adivasis. The Iranian farmers of the Elamo-Dravidian culture migrated to South Asia and mixed with many of these hunter gatherers creating the proto-Dravidian culture, which formed the Ancient South Indians (ASI). The Dravidians created the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) centered in modern Pakistan and also parts of modern India. The Indo-European migrations from Cental Asia after the collapse of Indus Valley Civilization pushed the Dravidian society and culture to the south while many northern Dravidian also mixed with the invading Indo-Aryans creating the Ancient North Indians (ANI). The Indo-Europeans Aryans culturally appropriated the Dravidian history and religion, mixed it with their beliefs and created Vedic Hinduism. They placed themselves at the top of the Caste System while the dark skinned Dravidians and Adivasis were placed lower in the caste system. There was continuous gene flow in both directions during more egalitarian Buddhist period when the caste system was weakened but it was later reinforced by the Hindu Gupta Empire. Nearly all the Hindu gods and goddesses are dark skinned as they were originally worshipped by the dark skinned aboriginal Adivasis and later by the Dravidians.

[@kamalkhan5305]

They were mixing but that Caste System originated during Gupta dynasty was enforced. Check following: www.themysteriousindia.net/caste-system-originated-gupta-dynasty-study/

[@chanakyagan]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYGynHSJhLeVbLM

[@chanakyagan]

gentical proof alone debunks aryan invasion theory

[@salkarsand123]

Kamal, then you have not heard about 'Kumari Kandam'....if ou co relating, the tings may be different....

[@NebulaGlow785]

@Hare Krishna that's wrong 😂 kumari kandam is a huge landmass connecting southern tip of kanya kumari , Madagascar, Australia it is mentioned by tamil scholars

[@urlagantinagaraju6815]

The bodies found in that Indus valley civilization region were of different time periods and that concluded as war ...I do have questions about it

[@apostale4986]

bodies found in indus valley have no sign of war or any mark of wound. dont spread bullshit without any reference

[@jamesstevenson7725]

Stop your lying

[@ganeshreddy2623]

He is just saying it may not be true, you both are misunderstanding him.

[@picture-perfect]

White invasion is a common story all over the world but in India it seems almost welcomed. A picture paints a thousand words so it a shame that pictures or accurate illustrations of South Asian hunter gatherers/Africans were NOT included in this video. The unmixed Jawara of the Andaman islands are what remains of the South Asian hunter gatherers, the original Indian, but no one here wants to talk about it. Waving the Aryan flag doesn't win you respect from Europeans.

[@lifenrose9972]

@Nara Fire true. and then according to geographical location everyone's color, physical appearance got changed

[@picture-perfect]

@@lifenrose9972 Nara Fire is living in a dream world. Africa is the source of all modern human beings, as science has confirmed. Changes in appearance (skin colour etc) occurred mainly after direct or indirect encounters with Neanderthal and Devonian creatures. Yes, migration into India, before some Africans moved on out of India. Some stayed, of course.

[@lifenrose9972]

@@picture-perfect true

[@ManabDasiammanab]

Who said Aryans have got anything to do with Europeans? And we kicked out British out in 1947.

[@Ragnar638]

Is there a part 2 of this, bcz data from Rakhigarh site is conflicting to this video.

[@kanjanarcoticmadeusfallbra9702]

Only one person tested. Aryan migration, Asian migration and European migration occurred post indus valley civilization

[@TheOnkarj]

Aryan invasion is debunked now

[@DraykeSax-Mac]

Loved the video. This video confirms what I already knew about the genetics of South Asia. However, in my case ANI and ASI contribute only half my ancestry since AAA (ancestral Austro Asiatic) and ATB (Ancestral Tibeto Burman) contribute the other half. Would have loved to see those included in the video and the affinity of population of the Eastern Indian Subcontinent (Eastern India, North East India and the Himalayan belt) to East Asian and South East Asian population groups. That's said, it's still a fantastic video. 🐒👏👍

[@drdre5030]

Full

[@Kratos9407]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/rauln2OJlrl-ibM

[@ABO-Destiny]

Is that your real face picture. You really look a mixture of many things ,😂😂😂👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙌

[@Mahendra-vh7ep]

@grassrootsyoutubers9519 let me tell you what the Aryan Invasion Theory is. The Indus Valley Civilization was the most advanced civilization ever found on Earth. They had knowledge of trigonometry, geography, and they made cities as mini-models to build the most efficiently planned cities with swimming pools that always supplied fresh water, etc. However, between a gap of 500 years, the Indus Valley Civilization was destroyed. Scientists tried to discover what exactly happened. Max Muller proposed a theory that Aryans (R1A) came and destroyed this civilization, but upon examination, there was no sign of wars. Another theory hypothesized that a tsunami occurred and destroyed the Indus Valley Civilization, but there is no sign or archaeological evidence of a tsunami. Then, another theory suggested that the Saraswati River dried up, but archaeological evidence shows that there were more than five rivers present there. How did the Indus Valley Civilization get destroyed? The last theory posits that Aryans (R1A), who were basically European and surrounded by neighbors like Rome and Greece, came to India. They only knew how to graze cows and didn't have knowledge of farming, so they learned farming from the original Dravidian people. After witnessing the fascinating development of the Dravidian civilization, Aryans got jealous and started creating problems in their work. They claimed that if you performed pooja or havan, your work would be done. After that, they themselves would do the work at night (by hiding), claiming it as a miracle of God and controlling the Dravidian mindset. The evidence supporting this theory includes the development of the word "ghas" in Sanskrit from the word "grass," and linguistic similarities found between European and Sanskrit languages, indicating European ancestry. Later, genetics development showed that North Indian (mostly higher caste) and South Indian people (mostly lower caste) DNA did not match. Instead, North Indian people's DNA matched with Europeans, specifically R1A, which was absent in original Indians. The similarity between Greek mythology and Ramayan mythology (Greek: the arrow was shot in his toe and he died because all his powers were in his toe. India: Ravan kay nabhi mai usski sari Shakti thi; if you shoot an arrow in Ravan's stomach, he will die) all prove that Aryans came from Europe. From my point of view, the past doesn't matter; it's happened. Now, we are Indian, and we have to look after India. We will develop if we unite. Let's forget our past and be one. ✅

[@DraykeSax-Mac]

@@Mahendra-vh7ep I've not read what you've written tbh. But I love being Indian. The only thing I'd like some of my fellow Indians (not necessarily you) to understand is that India is not a monolith. We are a collection of people, ethnicities, cultures, tribes, races, religious traditions who are related to each other in some way or another. And collectively we make India, we are Indian. There's no need for us to have everything in common. We can have varying degrees of differences and still have love and respect for each other and remain united. The day people across the board understand this we will have peace and there will be no need for us to talk about it. Sending positivity and warm wishes for the new year your way. 🙏

[@Theannahid]

very nicely explained, since Im from northern part of Iran, and southern part of Russia, my father always used to say that this was true that Indians and Iranians had one thing in common and it was to be Aryans...thanks for your comprehensive yet easily to understand explanation dear sir.

[@SenthilKumar-dl2cy]

haha lies 😂😂😂👍✌ keep believing it

[@Theannahid]

@@SenthilKumar-dl2cy , I think you should be proud of your Aryan blood connection, this theory is not fake, the human exodus from Africa and its expansion to all over the world is a strong evidence that no race in the world was belonged permanently to the same land...we all spread all over the world. I was shocked when I did my ancestry DNA test and it revealed that I was European , with Indian blood in me, where as I am an Armenian and I always believed to be an Armenian and nothing else. so please look outside of window of reality you'll see becoming of a member of a society or culture wasn't the same 25,000 years ago. the words like Hindu,Irani,English,French, American and so on is created by humans themselves and if you go further back you might see an African Tanszanian probably is one of mine and your cousins.

[@SenthilKumar-dl2cy]

@@Theannahid yup what ur saying is absolutely true!! humans moved out from africa but there was a drought in africa which make them to move towards east asia there the r1a1 gene formed. if r1a1 gene is formed in Europe then why the variance of r1a1 gene is higher in india when compared to the other parts of the world? this is our history i will not be a victim of fake aryan invasion theory. even the science genetics and scriptures supports out of india theory. but what ur saying is true we belong to human race and our religion is love and affection but everything has a history "true history". the true history is out of india theory even the national Geographic harvard university and bbc india supports out of india theory i dont know what is with the orthodox christian researchers. but believe me man out of india theory os true excavation of dwarka city the city which was built by krishna supports out of india theory.

[@Theannahid]

@@SenthilKumar-dl2cy I still think Indians and every other race in this world originated from Africa,then life events spread Human Race to all over the world thousands of years ago. and it is still happening, dear sir I believe for what you saying, then again when I look at mother Earth from outer space ( just imagining), I see a small spot going in circle around the sun together with so many other spots, then what comes in front of my eyes is, all creatures who were created by a Big Bang were originated from the same seed/gene,and in more details we were created by cosmic dusts created by Big Bang. Your Krishna, our Jesus Christ, Jews Moses, and Muslem's Mohammad all also carry human DNA, please don't separate yourselves from other human's on this Earth, it started to sound like grandiose.

[@MAN-jz6qc]

@@Theannahid first of all Aryan is not a gene, it's more of a cultural thing gene is R1A1 that is considered best or most superior gene and is found in highest concentration in North India Among khatri and Ahir castes both of whom are kshatriya or warriors the second highest Varna in Hindu system while brahmins have bit less R1A1 percentage in them but they are highest in Varna system so it clear that this kshatriya or warriors were the people who conquored all the land upto Europe from India that why's they also got a bit of R1A1 DNA in them but they are not aryans so if you go by this logic it looks like out of India theory is more sensible than migration theory.

[@Rishabh-Dev]

Indus Valley was the birthplace of Hinduism.🤘

[@Rishabh-Dev]

@Bonaparte No i am a descendant of IVC, Beyond all religions..✌️ Also pro-life and Pro-Nature.

[@masterprimal]

1:16 The scholars took samples from the people who 'seemed like they were from there - Not an assumption The hunter-gatherers were reduced to Andaman - Not an assumption from the Aryan invasion to the Aryan migration, the next could be the Aryan picnic theory - Not an assumption out of India theory which supports the Vedic and puranic texts - a presumption BRAVO!

[@daviddas5107]

Lol you think puranic texts are hard evidence?

[@masterprimal]

@@daviddas5107 You completely missed the point. Don't worry about it

[@danishhussain7127]

If Aryan Invasion theory is wrong then why so much LINGUISTIC similarity is found between Hindi, Sanskrit, Old Iranian (Avestani), Persian, English, French, German, Russian, Italian, Urdu, Pashto, Dari, Spanish and Croatian ?

[@MHCE444]

It's because India is the origin and people migrated out of India to go to Russia and Europe.

[@DeependraSingh11]

Out of africa and then out of india theory.

[@freespirit7328]

Becoz it went outwards

[@dominator120397]

Lmao Croatian?!😂😂😂

[@dominator120397]

@rkb xyz you are right except it was not Indians, it was pakistanis

[@ranjith999]

How about the keladi findings in tamilnadu? Haven't u included this in your reseach? I know u cant as lots of escavations are yet to be done which would change your ideas.

[@piyushbothra2651]

Keezhadi is just 600 BC. This is not going to prove the migration.

[@ranjith999]

@@piyushbothra2651 As I said above.. The excavations are still happening and yet to explore more than 80% across Tamilnadu.. Genes of Irular community currently resides in Western ghats of Tamilnadu matching with Harrapan culture's DNA samples. Here the link is proved. There are lot more to come.Wait and watch for ashtonishing facts.

[@Anonymous-xu2mz]

@@ranjith999 Ohh damn you replied after 2 years 😂

[@ranjith999]

@@Anonymous-xu2mz I have replied after 2 years because I got a response after 2 years. Plz see the msg chain. 😁

[@Anonymous-xu2mz]

@@ranjith999 Btw which state

[@newcellphoneguy9507]

I m hindu born in gujart little looks like Nepali and my gf is Muslim and she is from North India 🇮🇳

[@mr.o8539]

Beautiful video delivery important truths about our countries and people. Thank you.

[@kesavatadipatri9078]

These are not truths about our country, but lies about our heritage.

[@mr.o8539]

@@kesavatadipatri9078 LOL how so? Please elaborate, what do you think happened?

[@hrivaansahani1750]

@@mr.o8539 This is the reason why kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z5PWqpxqr757hpI

[@mr.o8539]

@@hrivaansahani1750 that is some sentimental nonsense. I am a Sounth Asian and I find immense pride in the actual history of our land. Out of India theory is a joke that is not accepted in any segment of academia because of Z-E-R-O evidence. Nothing but sentimental egocentric nonsense.

[@hrivaansahani1750]

@@mr.o8539 OIT: Sentimental nonsense with no prove AIT & Everything of great significance and value in India (Vedas, sanskrit sciences, mathematics Indic knowledge and philosophy) is from the west (Europe) When in reality its only found in the subcontinent and not where these so called "Aryans" came from: Scientifically proven! Brain cells *only two last remaining ones working* I'm Indian & I also, take immense pride in "ACTUAL" history of Bharat and not the history written by leftwingers and colonial supremacist who ran the country for the last 150 years and the following 65+ years, coinciding with the Eurocentric Elite "Scholars" Narrative. Q] Did you even see the video or you just came back within 20 minutes when the video itself is 2 Hrs long? Or did you not, because it doesn't fit according to your narrative as well, Fellow south Asian!

[@Sigma3095]

I clicked on this video by mistake. Never have I regreted a mistake this much.

[@vineetasjourney8017]

🤣🤣🤣

[@vineetasjourney8017]

Why?

[@NileshKumar-nr2vj]

No wait for illogical comments on your way. Totally anti intellectual, those have never read a single book on Anthropology.

[@vipulagora1325]

tune "Anthropology" ko gaaaaand main liya hua hai kya ?

[@jakeharper6189]

This are in the illusion world of their religion.

[@NileshKumar-nr2vj]

@@vipulagora1325 you wanna debate this ??

[@PJ-cu4cl]

@@NileshKumar-nr2vj You can just state facts here so these people who even get started. lol

[@nityanityaViveka]

This video actually makes 0 sense to anyone with a functioning brain. 1) It straw mans Out of India Theory as if it purports that there was no genetic mixing between population. OIT doesn’t claim that the genetics of people didn’t come from somewhere. It claims that there exists cultural continuity and regional cultural hegemony of the Dharmic faiths/culture that spread eastward and westward. Not the other way around. Genetic mixing has happened from time immemorial, we all came from Africa, but that doesn’t mean Vedic culture came from Africa or somewhere else. Indigenous historical accounts trace dharmic civilization north into Afghanistan and south to Kanyakumari, so why would expect mixing not to happen? 2) The video intentionally conflates evidence for genetic admixtures with cultural flow. There was a long time where people insisted that Vedic culture was unknown to IVC, and many even believe that today despite the plethora of evidence to suggest the opposite. The claim begins with invasion, morphs into a widespread migration, and now to a comingling of cultures in 2000bce. There is minimal evidence to indicate that migratory pastoralists are responsible for the fort building and clearly urban civilization of the Vedic hymns. Moreover, if the “aryans” were the steward of Vedic culture, why is it that no evidence of Vedic culture exists in the supposed homeland of the aryans, or any of the civilizations there? Clearly this theory only exists if the Vedic cultural beliefs of the “aryans” only came into being after entering India. This denotes the antiquity of the Vedas to post 2000BCE, and flies in the face of numerous datings that place the composition of the RG Veda family books far earlier in antiquity. Now if the claim is that there existed PIE culture that relates the two together then their language could not have been Sanskrit as Sanskrit is not ubiquitous, and it could not have been Vedic, as Vedic dieties are not ubiquitous. A proto culture must have existed. In that case the relationship of that proto culture’s influence and the indigenous cultures of India must be assessed. It is not obvious that they brought the vedas with them. It is obvious that the vedas were not composed monolithically, and are likely the construction of disparate traditions throughout the dharmic cultural network. All evidence points to that network existing throughout India, and extending deep into Afghanistan. 3) Given the predilection for Indians to prefer fair skin, it is equally likely that migratory pastoralists who did come into the continent from time to time were considered beautiful and fair, and that led to their intermarriage with “upper castes” and can account for the genetic disposition of the population. Conquest of those areas from early Indic expansionists in the Afghan/Iran region can explain this as well, and such conflicts are likely the essence of the Rg Vedic hymns. Most Rg Vedic hymns are about conflict with dasyus, and are likely linked with the Iranian Dahyus (s-h cognate). So to conclude a cultural takeover of an immense and hugely populated culture like IVC from trickling migrations is fanciful. Moreover, the claim that such migrants were able to overpower and impose casteism on top a much larger indigenous population is ridiculous. 4) Out of India movements can be understood as having happened throughout history, including Mithraism in Greece, Gypsy migratons, Aryabhatta’s mathematical works, and the cultural spread due to the sea faring IVC civilization. Assuming a eastward cultural flow by default is nothing but bias and bigotry. Poor take.

[@whathappened2230]

Thank you for this video! Let the truth be told! Peace and love to you all whoever you are❤

[@aryangujadhur1647]

So this is what comes up when I search up my name

[@NikhilMishra-bq6uu]

Such a biased video and the constant use of "Original People" "Indigenous People" "Real People" ignoring the fact that life evolved in East Africa and almost every one is a migrant some earlier some later. #Propoganda against a group of Indians from a typical person claiming victim hood. The biggest difference in appearance is because of climate for thousands of years people were agriculturists working in hot sun from morning to evening. So the exposure to sun played a dominant role generation after generation. The more closer to equator you are more is the tanning. So if the difference in appearance between people from every layer of India. A typical South Indian is more tanned than a typical Central Indian and a Central Indian is more tanned than a Kashmiri or Himachali.

[@Senthilganapathy]

Nikhil Mishra ..Ok leave the skin colour. What about culture. What about language. All South Indian language are so similar. I can easily understand 50% of malayalam, Telugu and Kannada without even learning the language. The grammar is exactly the same in all South languages. All lot of words in common. Where as the north indian languages are totally different from South, grammar and words.

[@jhareeshlove]

Senthil ganapathy hahaha who told u this.. M south Indian..I can't even understand tamil n malayalam except telugu.. Kannada seems same but it is also very different.. Telugu culture is very different from tamilian culture... Every place even every small village has it's own culture.. How can u say everyone is same?? Just by showing few similar points u don't have any right to rub ur culture on anyone.. There are many differences in our culture. Keep ur theory with u.. Don't rub ur dravidian aryan theory on every south Indian state... We have our own culture tradition n history lyk everyone do. U people are real frogs in well. Stop propagating ur NGO knowledge.

[@tangocharli1520]

Nikhil Mishra ; you are absolutely right. As the skull shape of all Indians irrespective to Their skin colour is of same kind. Proving it to be a same race of humans in the entire sub continent.

[@tangocharli1520]

Jhareesh Love ; you are entitled to your individualistic opinion. I have observed that Telugu people have a sense of insecurity when they are said to be derived from ancient Tamil. In the recent past *(some hundred years) Telugu are trying to move away to create a gap between other southindians. May be telgus feel inferior to be called as Dravidians and chose to be part of the Sanskrit origin. But let me tell you. No matter what telgus try to portray, their gene would tell the truth.

[@tangocharli1520]

Yo-sup Stahlin ; the sounds of alphabets and numericals is same of Sanskrit and Tamil. Both are derived from Same source. May be bhrami or some other ancient primitive language. Why Tamil is considered to be older? I think it is because of the archeological evidence found in various parts of south east world.

[@firephoenix019]

I'm genuinely confused. Why is everyone in comments triggered. Is it because the General Caste people can't accept the fact that we are all mixed? Or is it something else? Please enlighten me.

[@bear8ful]

The Firepheonix I absolutely have no fucking idea

[@firephoenix019]

Not_A_Gamer Xenophobia and racism. Not new though. The way we treat our brothers and sisters from north east is a proof of that.

[@scientificatheist9381]

Not_A_Gamer Aryans came and took over Lol. Those who settled in India were no Caucasian Aryan. They were Jews. The same Jewish societal structure which destroyed Nordic race .

[@anosjc]

Im having identity crisis. I have always known that we are very mixed since the beginning of time. Because neither we look white or black or mongoloid, the three basic races of human race. I wish I had a time machine and could see exactly where I came from. Also I don't think the Aryan invasion happened only 2000 years ago. It happened way before

[@phanikiranbodavula5523]

It would have happened 10000++ years ago.

[@curcumin417]

Just get a DNA test. At the end of the day -you're still a human being, with all the pros and cons. Enjoy.

[@ManabDasiammanab]

Most of us are Caucasoid Racially with a mix of Austro-Asiatic Tribals and Austroloid Dravidians.

[@anosjc]

@@ManabDasiammanab we Indians are the first mixed people of the world I suppose.

[@KishoreG2396]

@@anosjc The Aryan migration happened circa 2000 BCE (which is around 4000 years ago). The Vedas were composed around this time, maybe a couple centuries later. The Indian people derive from a wide variety of mixed ancestry. The very first Aryans who arrived probably resembled modern day Northern and Europeans (some had blonde hair and blue eyes, etc), but over time these phenotypes changed.

[@user-mc1om1wj9d]

I don't like to believe in the Indus valley thing, Sanatana Dharma and Bharata is older than that!

[@dontwastetimeyouarelosingr8172]

In our hindu religion we are mostly from up , Bihar , Delhi , Uttrakhand

[@user-mc1om1wj9d]

@@dontwastetimeyouarelosingr8172 ??? do you know the royal family in kerala started in treta yuga?

[@user-mc1om1wj9d]

@@dontwastetimeyouarelosingr8172 you are forgetting the stories of south India!

[@dontwastetimeyouarelosingr8172]

@@user-mc1om1wj9d yeah south India also included and in Ramayan the biggest proof well our hindu religion is all over India that time from north east to Afghanistan , from Jammu and Kashmir to srilanka

[@dontwastetimeyouarelosingr8172]

@@user-mc1om1wj9d no well this western media is so worst they only showing us bad side of Hinduism

[@aryanbanerjee7579]

Sources please...

[@Allenf16]

Aryan Banerjee Study Name: The genomic formation of central and South asia

[@aryanbanerjee7579]

Arun Nair Good One. Haha.

[@harshavardhana2859]

A recent paper. Even a very recent book has come on that. About people of indian subcontinent. Interested people can check it out.

[@razorphil4973]

Himanshu Bhatt use ur eyes and common sense . Thats the source .

[@Flyingkitty1234]

Source:trust me bro

[@sageofthemountain]

Holy shit! Since when did Max Muller come to life again? 🤣🤣

[@Shreyas834]

Sagar Butola the people are fine examples of the reminescense of colonial hangover

[@vipulagora1325]

Hahahahahahahahaha

[@jakeharper6189]

Since people has accepted scientific method facts and rationality to be basis of education and avoiding all folk stories of hindism and islam. About how world has created 🤣😂😂💃😂

[@jakeharper6189]

@@iamsogreat2951 nice joke 👌 brother 😂😂🤣😆😂. Use burnol if you ass hurt.

[@usanna4903]

When you and RSS went into your own tiny world of hibernation.

[@yatchoychu3146]

Thank you for a Very Concise Answer to a Complex Question. Namaste!!!

[@ramyajeevarathinam6737]

if gov excavates these places aadhichanallur keezhadi sivamalai etc we will get to know more about our real history but unfortunately government is not interested in these excavations

[@DilipSadh]

Dr David Reich ( Head of Genetics at Harvard ) who also led recent Rakhi Garhi (Harappan site) Genetic study. Said following. • Dr David said "All South Asians are Genetic descendent of IVC (Harappan)" • Dr David said "there is NO Archaeological evidence of any civilization like IVC in Central Asia at that time" • Dr David said " He does not know what is Aryan" Read his full interview as below economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/indus-valley-civilisation-is-largest-source-of-ancestry-for-south-asians/articleshow/71042072.cms?from=mdr -

[@joeytribbiani391]

To summarise it, We are all brothers and sister's ❤

[@soumyakanti17]

Probably for the first time, I have seen a coherent and scientific explanation of this topic. Thank you Scroll. :)

[@nerf2752]

abe wo chutiya bana raha hai.

[@kartikeyapathak2213]

and in the first time you have been exposed to fraud my friend..........Literally DNA of mine or a Tamil person is the same.......these people are themselves troubled by their colonial history learning.........

[@SithStudy]

@@kartikeyapathak2213 it’s not about colonialism. Scientific evidence goes against the out of India theory. You sound like an afrocentrist

[@Kratos9407]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/rauln2OJlrl-ibM ..

[@adithiarjun6764]

Bruh u look ugly as hell

[@logeshpp7717]

According to your theory none has lived in india in ancient past all are migrated from iran and steppes. there is pre history tool (3 lakh year before) evidence unearthed in tamilnadu.

[@julie5978]

Those people are the Indian hunter-gatherers, keep up.

[@ashishkumar8589]

Homo sapiens evolved from homo erectus around 2lakhs years ago. Some Homo sapiens first left African continent around 70thousand years ago. So dont spread 3lakh year bullshit. We are humans. These aryan theory propaganda is BS.

[@DemonicEmbrace]

Wrong because the original indians that lived in India who were the Andamins in south asia

[@kbee225]

Did you even listen to what he said?

[@asksnq_q2314]

Everybody came from east Africa

[@kazmageddon2]

Language, that holds the key. a good research on indo-european connection would give back some interesting results i believe. Until then, its our collective indo-european heritage that pretty much glues us all as "people of the great steppe", or something in line with "people who were invaded/interbred good by the people of the steppe." All in all, Europe and Asia are pretty much one continent anyways. So its only fair that our history should be, hate to break the cliche again, 'as mixed as it could be'.

[@shinkasama4712]

What about the archaeological findings in keeladi.

[@MAKavin-zr3hu]

@Hare Krishna what about kumari kandam (lemuria) dude? What about it's undiscovered underwater mysteries.....Is it 2500 years old?....If Indian government starts doing archaeological survey there the greatness of the Dravidian culture will be revealed...

[@vimalshivn.7441]

about Tamils non one want to Talk about them! Why?..........

[@manikandan_ip]

@Hare Krishna shut up Keezhadi has 2600 years old Tamil script. This means how many years before the script might be formed? And how many years the age of the language might be?.

[@manikandan_ip]

@Hare Krishna half knowledge is yours.

[@manikandan_ip]

@Hare Krishna yes. Keep the distance from me. It is safe for me.

[@astee.007]

Two things How can you say that the ancient ancestral south indian people is indigenous because humanity started in africa. So they are the first colonizers . Second that how they can say from a dna study that the arrival of steppe pastorals created an upheaval which was not created by Iranian agriculturalists .

[@aryanbanerjee7579]

atal purohit "Indigenous peoples, also known as first peoples, aboriginal peoples or native peoples, are ethnic groups who are the original inhabitants of a given region, in contrast to groups that have settled, occupied or colonized the area more recently. " Compared to the "pastoralists", the hunter gatherers were indigenous, just as compared to the British, the Indians in general were indigenous to the subcontinent. Indigenousness is subjective and usually has different contextual meanings.

[@astee.007]

Aryan Banerjee so they are relatively indigenous . Not totally indigenous . Words do matter .

[@aryanbanerjee7579]

atal purohit No, they are contextually indigenous. Usage of the word indigenous is supportive of this person's theory, and I don't see why the word indigenous is 'bad'.

[@astee.007]

Aryan Banerjee contextualy and factually are two different things and a theory is not 100% fact .

[@astee.007]

And the question is not of aryan migration the question also should be raised about African migration. And first they say all brahmins and upper caste has Eurasian ancestors now they have narrowed it down to only tiwari es .

[@shaktisinghbais3576]

A flaw in the study was that they took a sample from people who probably are from indus Valley civilization....ab pehle se decide kar lenge ki indus valley ke log kaise honge toh result bhi waisa aayega na

[@premg2010]

IF DRAVIDIANS WERE IN NORTH INDIA WHERE ARE THE EVIDENCE OF THERE SETTLEMENT. IF ARYANS WERE ORIGINALLY FROM CENTRAL ASIA OR EUROPE THEN WHY IS THERE NO CIVILIZATION FOUND AT THE ORIGIN.

[@ishanbhatt6067]

That's not how you summarize a research work.. Researchers don't use adjectives and they don't reiterate the same things. The opening premise and the conclusion were almost the same thing!!

[@gcs2128]

You will have to note that the very ancient greater India was extended up to Turkey and the present middle East!! Reference:Mahabharata

[@gcs2128]

You could refer the below links, to know, that hinduism and boundaries of India was spreaded upto Turkey and Russia in the north, Above all the below links, Dr. Subramaniam Swamy confirmed it in one of a public interview. www.quora.com/in/What-was-happening-in-other-parts-of-the-world-when-Mahabharat-was-happening-in-India www.rbth.com/blogs/tatar_straits/2017/03/11/did-ancient-indians-immigrate-to-the-russian-caucasus_717193

[@bear8ful]

Amol Khobragade Yeah like islam is real lol

[@bear8ful]

Why do you beat your own drums, that their is only one god follow my god or we kill you?

[@DMD65]

You can give reference from Mahabharata in literature not in scientific studies.

[@subhrodeepsaha9245]

@@DMD65 Exactly!!

[@rumadhakacitygirlusa3471]

Yes we people from subcontinent are truly diverse in anthropological terms. Thanks for this valuable video. I am a female from subcontinent born in Dhaka city 😃😃

[@achudhan3001]

Just because the facts hurt others feelings that doesn’t mean it’s a lie the world doesn’t revolve around you lol for the people who said Aryan invasion doesn’t happen

[@srinidhi7140]

Im south Indian, im kannadega, ಜೈ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಜೈ ಭಾರತಾಂಬೆ 🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳💞💞💝💝💖💖💕

[@SenthilKumar-gz1ll]

tamil is mother of language of kannada,telugu, tulu, malayalam

[@Thorfinn47.]

@@SenthilKumar-gz1ll , lol kid tamil is just one of language evolved Harappan proto dravidian language when they harappan civilization collapsed and they moved to south, all these languages developed from one common language which was spoken in northern India Pakistan region. So black African tribe mixed tamil activists who scream dravidian propaganda all day are not even true native speakers of language, Dravidian language created in harappan civilization which is in north Indian region, I am a kannadiga and tamil is just one of language evolved from Harappan language along with Kannada, malayalam, telugu , Tulu , kodava etc . There are Harappan dravidian language speakers in Pakistan also called brahui, whose ancestors were harappans who stayed their only and mixed with aryans and preserved the original language, so harappan is original first and oldest language of India .

[@DM-ce6su]

@1:25 ."who SEEMED like they were PROBABLY from there".. yeah,thats "Science" for you. man even i could do better than that. btw scroll.in is funded by IPSMF,whose donors are Mr Amir Khan and other Parsis(Iranians). So parsis are promoting material that says they were india's ancestors... also,that paper hasnt been peer reviewed yet.Similar genetics doesnt indicate the direction of migration.but ofcourse the parsis are quick to conclude aryan migration theory was right...they kind of have a dog in this fight

[@manjitrupbikram]

Anon ymous 😂

[@DM-ce6su]

You moron,try to understand what was written in my comment before replying. i never contested the fact that Iranians are part of the greater indo-european people.but similar genetics doesnt indicate the direction of migration. Also,i dont know how the fuck you concluded that the iranians living in iran today are not the iranian agriculturalists from the past?What was your basis for that conclusion?your hunch? My entire point was,this theory(Aryan Migration)and your conclusion "Iranians and Aryans are steppe people from eastern Europe who later immigrated to iran and north India" relies on,as i quoted earlier, genetic evidence of people "who SEEMED like they were PROBABLY from there"(@1:25),which, if you cant comprehend from the words 'seemed' and 'probably',is bullshit. This aryan migration/invasion theory was hatched by nazi and other european scholars in the 18th century to justify their colonialism. As to why its debunked,The entire theory rests on dating the Rig Ved (Oldest Ved) after 1500 BC(1500 BC was when the Supposed Aryans Supposedly invaded Indus Valley,and brought along sanskrit)but the Rig Ved talks about Saraswati River flowing strong.The Saraswati river has since dried up.That was all fine for the european scholars until Modern Paleography put the date of the Saraswati drying up at about 3800 BC.So now there is proof that the river(Saraswati) dried up by 3800 BC,and the Rig Ved talks about Saraswati river flowing strong,so the only conclusion that can be made from these facts is that the Rig Ved, Sanskrit(Which is what the Rig Ved is written in),and the entire Vedic civilization predated the supposed Migration/Invasion by a good 2000 years,thus the language(Sanskrit) and the civilization couldnt have been brought to India by the Supposed "Steppe people",it is indigenous to India. So how do the european scholars reconcile this contradiction?they dont,they just bury their heads in the ground and pretend like an ostrich that the contradiction doesnt exist.

[@sunnyd.1990]

sauban musaddiq two months later.... still... crickets. Convincing argument sauban🤓

[@sunnyd.1990]

sauban musaddiq says who!? You nonsensical boob!

[@sunnyd.1990]

Go on, name just ONE 'scholar' dumdum😂. what a ridiculously obvious fraud you're hoping to perpetrate. No one with the slightest bit of common sense would recognize you as anything but a shyster, but please continue for the laugh of it.....

[@ronniehossain7500]

Please don't confuse origin of India's populations with words like Indo-European, Aryan, Iranians and North Afghanistan. Reality is way different.

[@ayushirawat988]

Ek kaam kro jitne b comments m lad rhe ho na Jakr apna DNA test kra lo 😂😂... Or agar koi aryan ya fir dravidan ya fir Mongolian ya fir blah blah nikla ek dusre ko novel prize dedena ok😂😂🤪 or fir desh k baare m b sochlena ye krke

[@najamshahzad2351]

😁😁

[@helloshort4489]

Lmao

[@ramdayalism]

Ayushi rawat , you are of Mongolian ancestry ☺️

[@abhishekjangid1979]

Sai kaha pata nai konsa nasha karte h ye log🤣

[@Flyingkitty1234]

😂

[@happyone4753]

Congrats and well done. Superb Video. I am very sorry for my long comments below. But I had to add to an excellent video my incredible anthropological discovery and research. The Cassi or Khasi are described as an Iron Age Tribe of Britain. Please read my detailed history of the Khasis below.

[@jitendrasoorada2649]

Could those 96 researchers collect few samples from Kelladi TN...or was there a central agenda which influenced these researchers not to collect soo....

[@shubham42150]

What do you mean by central agenda.

[@youmahesh84]

its keezhadi

[@bobbykiefer4306]

Mitanni Aryans brought horses and chariots into India.

[@human3213]

Bobbly keiger Please check your brain Mitannis were not aryans lol Forget about horses

[@counterstriving]

Well-done! the video is fascinating, informative, clear, and nicely presented. Thanks.

[@lalitkashyap1583]

The strange thing is that a big chunk of population thinks their ancestoral ABBA were from ARAB 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@xiijinpingthesupremeleader1349]

Agree🤣🤫🤣

[@Survivethejive]

Great video, but many will not like it

[@l5475]

Agreed. The very fact that Aryans that ruled Eurasia were ancient whites triggers allot of people. R1A is a white gene, even its mutated Asian gene.

[@gazibizi9504]

@@l5475 people are triggered because it proves North India and South India is by Civilization of different origin and not one altogether. It would mean Non-Brahmins in both North and South India would be hostile towards Brahmins and so Hinduism. It would break apart the whole world view of Hindu nationalists and their understanding of India into mud. They fear this might eventually lead to balkanisation of the Indian Republic beginning in South as they're already well educated and considerably developed from whole India and do already have a history of anti-India callings.

[@thatguybutitsactuallyagirl5384]

@@gazibizi9504 Well, then they should stop the caste system bullshit.

[@gazibizi9504]

@@thatguybutitsactuallyagirl5384 You know no educated Indian is for caste system and neither does it matter much now but caste system is structurally such that abolishing for the sake of it makes no sense. What do you think about abolishing Racism or the concept of Race? You get the point? Even if we try it is futile. Caste system is not really important anymore and with few generations it would be forgotten and that is the only way.

[@saarbrooklynrider2277]

@@l5475 yes, and Western European hunter gatherers had dark skin. Still no one here cares. I don't now why it is such a controversial topic in India. Get over it. It's history.

[@sridharbhatk3510]

There is no need to say that we r all mixed races. If we can imagine d life of prehistoric & ancient period through epic stories Of ancient civilizations & puranik + folk stories , it says all types of human relations among man & woman had happened. We only have cultural heritage of caste, creed,......everything to have a cordial relations inside family. We should be ready to accept & respect other cultural heritages too.

[@markonefly]

Thanks for sharing this information and good way of explaining

[@TheShantanuC]

False anti India narrative, caste is a baseless narrative

[@wers233]

Shantanu Chakravarty Yeah sure that's why we find caste everywhere, right? Idiot

[@joyal876]

Actually it anti-castiset. It debunks the brahmin supremacy which is the root of caste system.

[@anybody9059]

Shantanu Chakravarty yes true this vdo is fake science propogandist with Political agenda plz report this channel

[@DarkKnight-or1ck]

Really cast was baseless narrative hahahahaha your whole religion was based on it ......and you say it's baseless 😂😂😂😂😂

[@johnreese5230]

Brahmins were not the only 'upper caste' kshatriyas too are responsible for caste discrimination

[@vineflower]

What is so controversial about this? Who is getting angry? Could someone explain this to me?

[@Anskurshaikh]

Because if this theory is true, it means that Fair skinned Brahmins are descendants of Aryans and they don't belong to India, India would belong to Dark-Skinned Dravidians which were the ancestors of original humans who came to India after migrating from Africa i.e the first humans to lay claim to Indian subcontinents were ancestors of present day south indians. This study might be used by some Dravidian nationalists from south to incite violence and controversy against north Indian which could lead to instability of country and its integral identity. Thus it is controversial.

[@luMBAgO69420]

I’m Australian But have Nazi Ancestors so I have An Aryan body but just don’t write bad hating comments plz

[@flaminmongrel6955]

Except the word aryan comes form Sanskrit rig veda's word "arya" which means "noble" mostly used for then "academics" regardless of their skin colour or hair colour.

[@luMBAgO69420]

Adi Mate thx

[@ramloganfracic5761]

I am grateful for this valuable information. And technology that we can enjoy these interesting videos. Please share some more Thank you and Blessings .OmShanti.

[@gauravbanerjee6165]

Where are the research papers?