ATACMS missiles could force Putin into 'negotiated settlement' over Crimea | Col. Mark Cancian

"These missiles can cause a lot of damage because they have the 1000 pound warhead"
ATACMS and other NATO missiles could force Putin into "negotiated settlement" if strikes on Crimea continue, says Col. (Retd.) Mark Cancian from the CSIS.
---
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/...
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...

[@videomaniac108]

'Negotiated settlement'? No, Pooptin needs to just gtf out of Crimea.

[@JoeJones-kn8sh]

Not ever going to happen the UKRAINIAN NAZIS no that Russia has been in charge of Crimea for hundreds of years. And the UKRAINIAN state been sovereign for 31 years. Learn more monkey

[@JoeJones-kn8sh]

There will never be negotiations with Ukraine because they can't keep there word. No cease fire no weapons down until the Denazification and demilitarising of Ukraine is done.

[@chadimirputin2282]

The US needs to get out of Syria and stop stealing their oil. 👍

[@rajlowkie6616]

​@@chadimirputin2282The Kurdish people benefits from the defensive weapons they receive from their allies from the sale of their own oil🛢 that supports their existence and a Kurdish homeland, older history maps show a ("KURDISTAN").

[@chadimirputin2282]

@rajlowkie6616 that's Syrian oil not kurdish oil.

[@darrenbrians5930]

Get negotiations out of your head. You cant negotiate with a terrorist. This will end when Russia goes home.

[@philiphorner31]

If Russia uses nukes it ends.

[@robertatkins9419]

They are home

[@jim2376]

Exactly!

[@user-otzlixr]

@@robertatkins9419Good, they can take comfort in ending their life at ‘home’.

[@robertatkins9419]

@@user-otzlixr But they won't be ending their lives, and you just struck out again. That's two strikes, do you want to go for the hatrick?

[@luminyam6145]

This is what an interview should be like, this woman consistently knocks it out of the park.

[@ddon1797]

That dude is just making details about those weapons up though 😂 ... I couldnt listen to the full thing due to that. Before you say anything to defend it, it has contradictory information to other segments they have released. My gripe is with their interviewee

[@markjohnston7869]

Maybe he is aware that security is more important than the interviewers endless curiosity. @@ddon1797

[@letXeqX]

@@ddon1797 These kind of comments always make me laugh. If you claim he's "just making details" why don't you just say what they are?

[@johndewhirst3089]

Massive contrast between her and the American graduates on work experience.

[@lombardo141]

No that’s the difference between British media and American media. One is mostly publicly funded , the other is driven by ratings and money

[@barrylane1055]

This lady is an outstanding interviewer!!! Thanks Times Radio

[@jacqdanieles]

Absolutely

[@takeitasacompliment.]

Yes!

[@dh4521]

I was just about to say that the quality of the questions is outstanding. Great content from Times Radio.

[@jesperjfl]

Yes, she is brilliant.

[@JoeJones-kn8sh]

She fooking great a reading the pre written western media narratives, apart from that useless.

[@AndyBonesSynthPro]

British cousins, thank you for the Stormshadow missiles 🇬🇧🇺🇦✊️🇺🇸🇪🇺🌎

[@Brian-om2hh]

A "negotiated" settlement? With the nation who - during a press conference - said that they had no intention of invading Ukraine, then did exactly that 4 days later? How could you trust *any* deal they offered you?

[@zawadix9574]

On point

[@peterwhite7428]

Kate. You find the most informative and articulate experts for your broadcasts. This man is a perfect example. Keep up the good work Peter USA

[@takeitasacompliment.]

Ukraine will only accept Putin's surrender and return to pre-2014 boundaries. Any different discussion by these talking heads just gives Putin ammo thinking he continue to fight and get some kind of victory out of this.

[@JoeJones-kn8sh]

Haha you're as intelligent as potato Joe.

[@paulturner7206]

@@JoeJones-kn8sh Is Potato Joe a good friend of yours? You seem to know him quite well. (... or are YOU Potato Joe?)

[@Justintdot]

In other words the Slavs are going cause tens of thousands more deaths to each other while we cheer on from social media 😂😂😂

[@mebsrea]

Putin will fight at least until November 2024. He’s counting on getting his agent back into the White House.

[@dumptrump2294]

NO NEGOTIATIONS. Total and Absolute Victory to Ukraine , including all her territories. This includes Tuzla Island and Crimea.

[@MoralScienceEducation]

I agree. Negotiations could only evolve outside the topic of Ukraine and with their President and Government at the helm. For example the concept Invented by former President Gorbatchov in his book Perestroika, could be useful. He suggested countries agree on a few matters of essence to the world in general in regards to their external politics, for there is no second Arch of Noah. Hope Russians will have a transition, ethical leadership which takes responsibility for the country's wellbeing, followed by elections, towards democracy, presuming this will be the choice of most Russians by then, towards Russia's best destiny🙏

[@dancahill9585]

Absolutely. Russia has proved her signatures are worthless in both Budapest and Minsk.

[@ninjasixrr]

There will be negotiations when Russia wins and it will be on its terms! Ukraine is losing its just western media will not report it !

[@macmcleod1188]

You can't negotiate with someone who is broken so many treaties and cease-fires. Russia needs to leave. And then UN peacekeeping forces need to be put between the two armies.

[@baneta1]

​@@linakazakova4208total dork

[@SuperMagnum2011]

An amazing interview kate thanks again.🇬🇧🇺🇦🇬🇧

[@VE427HDT]

Putin to the negotiated settlement? aren't you forgetting something, Ukraine doesn't want to negotiate only Russians to leave every part of Ukraine including Crimea, there is no end that includes Russia keeping it, if you knew anything about Ukraine you would know how much Crimea means to the Ukrainians

[@fintonmainz7845]

If you knew anything about Ukraine you would know it's not as simple as that.

[@blargvlarg1390]

Well, "Get Out Of Ukraine" could also be part of the terms of any negotiation. Getting the proverbial knife to the throat of the Russian occupation might open up new avenue of negotiation.

[@artnull13]

I agree - what guarantee has any deal with Russia have - none. Russia already broke their promises made in Minsk Treaty 1991, Budapest memorandum 1994 and Ukraine-Russia Friendship treaty 1997 Their word is worthless

[@jameslawrence3666]

They want all their country back.... not exactly unreasonable. Russia is unlikely to gain ground so for that reason alone they keep the idea of negotiations afloat. They have no intention of sticking to any agreement.

[@no-barknoonan1335]

​@@jameslawrence3666Exactly, same way they kept Macron at the negotiation table and pretending they were trying to avoid war, meanwhile the order to start the invasion had already been given. Their word is worthless as long as Putin and his brownshirts are still there.

[@bigblue6917]

As I understand it the Storm Shadow's Ukraine is using is an older model which was due to be decommissioned by the British. Giving them to Ukraine not only helps them but has saved Britain the cost of decommissioning the missile. I believe that counts as a Win-Win for Ukraine and Britain

[@terrycurzon1318]

Would love to see the updated storm shadow in action….

[@dennisstreatfield9012]

A win -win for Britain 🇬🇧? Yes definitely A pleasure to help destroy Putin . In the U.K. we have long memories of soviet and now Putins behaviour. We haven’t forgotten Litvenko or the Salisbury poisoning. And constantly trying to enter our airspace or waters. Bloody annoying 😡

[@bigblue6917]

@@dennisstreatfield9012 Putin is finally getting his comeuppance

[@bigblue6917]

@@terrycurzon1318 I get the feeling that Putin would rather not

[@grahamstrouse1165]

That’s not the case. Storm Shadow is a very modern missile system. The export version Ukraine received does have a lower maximum range than the version the Brits use.

[@themoonman-4]

Bravo! Great interview

[@CameronPOrter-nf9uu]

What l like about Kate as an interviewer is that she doesn't interrupt the guest all the time like so many other journos😊

[@pedtrog6443]

Yes. Some of that is the generous amount of time allocated for the interview and not having to hurry things to accommodate a 5 minute slot, for example. But yes, she is a superb interviewer.

[@Piaseczno1]

Kate also doesn't sport obnoxious nose or lip rings or neck tattoos and other "personal" body garbo to make a statement about herself. Good, knowledgeable journalism professional.

[@richardm-n]

Many Thanks Kate and to your guest Col. Cancian

[@davidstringer8711]

Two things continue to impress me -- the quality of Times Radio interviewers, especially this lady, and the quality of retired American military analysts. May it continue -- it makes up for a lot of the dross online.

[@edwardfowle2404]

Thanks Kate!! I really love your guests!! Awesome choices. Please keep them coming. You are my first stop everyday, and I love your questions. They are hard hitting and what we all would like to learn about. Thank you From the US of A. Slava Ukraine!!

[@michaelc3416]

As usual, Kate does a great job of doing an impromptu interview. By that I mean, I know that she has a list of prepared questions, but she also creates intelligent questions "off the cuff" based on the responses as the conversation develops. Pertinent and intelligent questions is sorely lacking in today's video journalism. This woman deserves more recognition and perhaps a raise!

[@bend3rbot]

Yeah? I must've missed that, also any genuine intrigue and joie de vivre.

[@jt3742]

It’s not impromptu. They all are from her house

[@hansrijke8477]

Araise you say a hanging one !

[@samuelpenalosa3034]

I’m not interested in the interviewer. I want to know what’s going on in the war. Who’s winning?

[@GregZO6]

"Questions ARE"...Geesh.

[@jamesewanchook2276]

Good guest. Slava Ukraini! 🇨🇦🇺🇦

[@brunosmith6925]

Love you Kate - one of Radio's best anchors. I hope Times Radio appreciates you as much as your audience does.

[@midimusicforever]

Putin should be forced out of all of Ukraine!

[@chadimirputin2282]

America should be forced out of Syria and stop stealing their oil.

[@awf6554]

​@@chadimirputin2282What's Ukraine got to do with Syria.

[@ingoditrust7784]

​@@chadimirputin2282yeah, try to brainwash us, believing we are slaveZ like you

[@justinwolf7490]

@@chadimirputin2282​ the US is not stealing their oil idiot. The US doesn’t need their oil. The US is there to protect the Kurds and Syrians and their oil from the murdering Russians and Assad. Russia needs to stop carpet bombing Syrian villages and killing children but Russia loves killing children all over the world. What Russian General Surovikhan did to Syria will be marked in history as a war crime. But it’s ok Russia is running out of bombs and Ukraine won’t be forgiving with their vengeance. 🚨 Ukrainian breakthrough imminent 🚨 😊

[@caseymalambo1306]

Truly pootin has killed innocent neighbors including Russian separates claiming independence in Ukraine

[@owenmaddocks1506]

The Russians target hotels in Odessa, The Ukrainians target The Russian Black Sea Command, Draw your own conclusions

[@mrjerzheel]

The hotel was being used by Ukraine military

[@leecudmore-ray6697]

@@mrjerzheel are the military hiding in grain silos as well?

[@JoeJones-kn8sh]

​@@leecudmore-ray6697no just grain in the grain silo's.

[@tonupharry]

An empty hotel 😁

[@awf6554]

​@@mrjerzheelLol. Says Russia and it's shills.

[@markminton677]

As always, an outstanding, informed interview - thank you

[@benoitlevesque9609]

1st Russia leave all Ukrainian territories. Then we can start to negotiate.

[@Brian-om2hh]

Nothing to negotiate about. Ukraine joins NATO, full stop. Then if Putin tries it again, it'll be 31 times worse for him next time...

[@dianeheddon7093]

yep! negotiate with usa uk nato to not let them go back to ukraine EVER and dismantle their nukes in russia not on us!!

[@evangiles4403]

Well once the russians leave there is nothing to negotiate Russia would have no say in anything to do with crimea or ukraine

[@johnrambo6265]

leave when you are wining ...........once the money has run out .. this over

[@MrMielten]

Negotiations? But only if Crimea returns to Ukraine!

[@JoeJones-kn8sh]

Ukraine only be sovereign for 32 years and Russia and USSR been in control of Crimea for thousands of years it's not happening. Ukraine will not be a country anymore it's a territory and Poland will invade the west and take be what was once there's. The UKRAINIAN NAZIS ARMY have really fooked things up. But there still fools like you so you should go and help them fight.

[@canisXsapien]

The only things that Russia needs to negotiate is how much they are going to pay to Ukraine and how many officials need to be extradited after Putin

[@RyanBrown-nx8dw]

Ya lol the Russians arnt giving u anything😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@jpyt7022]

You live in a fantasy world

[@gregorydesleskine3413]

Crimea now has very few water resources after ruzzia blew up the Kahovkha dam, they basically already shot themselves in the foot.

[@mebsrea]

You seem to be under a misapprehension that Putin wants Crimea for reasons that have anything whatsoever to do with the well-being of its residents. Crimea is a base with which to make an independent Ukraine untenable, no more, no less.

[@hybridforcesofthegdl3313]

Stay strong Ukraine 👏💪🇺🇦🇵🇹 Бабушка - настоящая украинка! Низкий поклон. А оккупантам, хлеб с солью не обещаем, а пирожки с мышьяком - всегда пожалуйста!

[@chrisbremner8992]

500 K Ukrainian dead already. This war should have been avoided.

[@longandshort6639]

We in the U.K. 🇬🇧 support Ukraine 🇺🇦 💯 against the RuZZian Orc invasion. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦!!!! For total victory ✌️

[@newshound64]

Before the missile attacks on the naval headquarters in Sebastapol, Ukrainian forces already had systematically destroyed all of the Russian anti-air missile defense within Crimea. That is why no defense stopped the Ukrainian missiles.

[@briancarno8837]

Russia shot down 7 out 0f 10 missiles

[@helenmcinerney1058]

So 3 did the trick 💥

[@Batman-vr6jp]

And how they destroyed defense 😅

[@briancarno8837]

@@helenmcinerney1058 did what trick..? damaged the roof of a government building..? So what..?

[@my-yt-inputs2580]

@@briancarno8837 Roof of a building? Somebody's got a blind spot.

[@geraldstokes5661]

Your a good interviewer, Kate, i enjoy ur program , thanx .

[@pastForgetting]

The Russians never throw anything away, but those 50 plus year old shells and missiles are a danger to the crews firing them.

[@rangerrick2246]

don't forget the 70 year old rations and helmets, uniforms must have moth holes in them. Just watched an informative video today that said their brand new 155 shells weren't going off. So the artillerymen opened the shells.... yup detonators were new but WHAT'S THIS??? NO TNT? They were shooting blanks

[@jacqdanieles]

Crews are expendable ... remember, this is orcistan we're talking about

[@gerryhouska2859]

And the downside is?

[@ChuckAmadi]

More like Zorcs don't decommission or maintain anything.

[@dianeheddon7093]

haha i think the spies helped along the line in russia there we do have them around the globe u know@@rangerrick2246

[@teddy.d174]

Another brilliant interview by Kate. It’s always a pleasure to see her skills and mastery of her craft at work. It’s untrue that the 🇺🇸 sent cluster munitions because they were out of standard artillery ammunition. The reasons for sending cluster munitions were stated by General Milley and others, which included clearing out trenches of Russian forces and helping to clear out minefields as well.

[@achoice2bmade]

🤦‍♂️

[@AlBundy310]

Cluster munition themselves create a minefield when they fail to explode and this will effect ukraines farmers for many years to come.

[@sarge12212]

@@AlBundy310 Newer cluster munitions have only a 2-3% failure rate. So not that much long-term danger.

[@kelvinw.1384]

​@AlBundy310 newer us cluster muntions bombers are not explosive ordinance but now sharpened metal propellants. So not much of an issue about turning an area into a minefield. Cause the US reliezes after many conflicts they have to peacekeep the same area. But I know facts won't override your paid russian handlers.

[@sarge12212]

​@@AlBundy310Is that why Russia uses them so much in Ukraine? Russia cluster munitions have a 50% failure rate.

[@paularivero1878]

Excellent interview. Thank you so much TIME RADIO.I have learned a lot about type of missiles❤❤🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸🇺🇸🇬🇧🇬🇧

[@johnsmith1474]

All you can learn about here is Western neocon fascism.

[@niklaswikholm514]

Heat building up on Krimea

[@johnnyjohnny7204]

appreciate the higher sound level on this video. your shows are 'never miss' journalism so really want to be able to hear them.

[@CONTACTLIGHTTOMMY]

2 million each. Money well spent.

[@newshound64]

One of the ways that Ukrainian forces knew that the meeting would be held in the main building is that they already had used a Storm Shadow missile to destroy the alternative, likely secret meeting building near the city. When Ukrainian intelligence learned of the time of the meeting, they could be sure where to aim their missiles to decapitate the Black Sea fleet.

[@AntonioLima-mv5cg]

😂😂😂😂😂 more like mental gymnastics 🤸‍♀️

[@AntonioLima-mv5cg]

All in the assumption that the Russians are just a bunch of dummies !

[@michaelking9195]

@newwhound64 What is the source information for this claim?

[@IMGreg..]

@@michaelking9195 Simple logic, silly boy. Take out air defense systems to make attacks possible 2 HQ's minus secondary = 1 HQ Bomb drydock, killing a sub and ship creates the need for a meeting Spy's tell you when, destroyed secondary HQ tells you where Ukrainian intelligence is playing 3D Chess and Russians are playing the fool.

[@BABOOM69]

Was a Russian soldier who gave info on meeting as apparently wasn't getting paid, I don't blame him - imagine risking ypur life for putin and he's like nah you die, and I'll keep the money, either way they were all crowded in the lower basement area and BOOM! Splattered into one big pile of Russian mush 😂😂😂😂👍🇬🇧❤️🇺🇦

[@coolersmoke]

A single cluster ATACMS landing on the Kerch Bridge when an unarmoured train hauling fuel wagons across.. now there's a plausible scenario. Especially since we know already that Ukraine has intel about train schedules, since they've already struck the bridge while a train was crossing.

[@beefsuprem0241]

Wow she laid it on a bit thick with the storm shadow questions, I thought she was going to ask him the serial numbers of the ones used by the end😂😂

[@mikedevlin2048]

Making Crimea untenable would require the land bridge being cut and the Kerch to be made inoperable… both of which are tough to do but not beyond possibility within a six to nine month period if the west supported Ukraine with more long range systems and air power in the form of F16’s, which will be operational by spring’24

[@dpelpal]

Ukraine has already reclaimed 60% of the land russia occupied this time last year. Anything is possible for the Ukrainian army at this point.

[@macmcleod1188]

The land bridge is effectively cut in two places now. Crimea isn't getting sufficient re-supply any more. Most of the western part of the land bridge is starving for supplies to. I saw that some had no artillery support any more. The eastern part of the land bridge is still well supplied ... but by trucks?!?! Donesk and Luhansk have solid rail line supplies for now so I'd love to see sufficient long range weapons to cut their rail lines. The day can't come to soon for the Kerch Bridge to be cut permanently.

[@s0ycapitan]

The ATACMS allegedly to be supplied won't help take out the Kerch as it's cluster bombs. The F16s won't last long amid the Russian integrated air defence - even if they have sufficiently clean airstrips to operate from. As for the land bridge, considering Ukraine can only put together squad sized formations that's never going to be severed.

[@dpelpal]

@@s0ycapitan How'd russian air defense work 3 days ago when *STORM SHADOW* was slamming into the russian naval HQ?🤭

[@John-hu9qg]

​@@dpelpal60%😂😂, you must be joking, the counteroffensive has been an unmitigated disaster.

[@chrissmith7669]

The only settlement is a full withdrawal

[@markelder9058]

Uk provide Storm Shadow, France brought Scalp and Germans may provide Taurus. Where are the American Tomahawks?

[@sambassil7825]

This is an awesome interview, questions and answers serious and measured with facts.

[@jonathanbadcock5886]

Great interview and good knowledge from the colonel

[@jameslawrence3666]

Yup, that's exactly what I have been saying for over a year, ever since the forced retreat from Kherson

[@wapiti3750]

I kept laughing when Col. Cancian was talking: he looks like a younger version of grandpa on the Munsters! 29:00

[@Muddrelks]

I'm sure this guy is very capable and knowledgeable but this has been one of the longest 30 minutes of my life

[@niklaswikholm514]

The bridges in ○rcland bordering ukraina needs "impovment"

[@chadimirputin2282]

Ukraine needs to be net zero by Xmas, lights out and huddled in their bunkers. 😂

[@Brian-om2hh]

They'll be re-modelled quite soon I imagine.....

[@Grenadier1976]

So, if the ATACMS cluster munitions is what would prove most beneficial to Ukraine, but they're "controversial", what's to prevent the U.S. from sending them without announcing it? .

[@JoeJones-kn8sh]

Another game changer Russia has seen it all while Russia still fighting with shovels and washing machine chips. The UKRAINIAN NAZIS ARMY are useless against the Russian army. When you remove the western media narratives from you're eyes, you will see.

[@LarsRyeJeppesen]

Zero problems

[@dianeheddon7093]

yes USA UK NATO WILL get together when need be i think..they are not rushing thats all

[@JoeJones-kn8sh]

@@dianeheddon7093 yes USA and UK have no more weapons to give to the UKRAINIAN NAZIS ARMY but they still have the able to train you and send you on 5 weeks Training then sent to you're deaths. There are not bothered if you're man or woman. Why you not there???

[@IhateNazilovers]

International law and government if you don't want the world to know they purchase them it make them yourself the UKRAINIAN NAZIS ARMY.

[@dennisstreatfield9012]

Yes , she’s an excellent interviewer,asks all the right questions.😊

[@igaltivoni]

Kudos for fixing the audio issues 🎉

[@PedroFerreira-ze5yp]

MAKE CRIMEA UNTENABLE

[@user-kn9mt5tx9w]

Ничего вы не сделайте

[@keith8609]

Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦 🇬🇧

[@allansmith3837]

Victory to the Russian Federation. Down with the USA and Nato.

[@keith8609]

@@allansmith3837 why don't you go and live in Russia if you believe Putin's BS

[@allansmith3837]

@@keith8609 if I was a young man again I would be off in a shot. But if you're looking for BS look no further than western media especially American media followed by the BBC.

[@Goat.Herder]

I like Kay, she isn't over dramatic or fear mongering and doesn't over exaggerate things.

[@robert100xx]

General Ben Hodges has been advocating this for many many months.

[@425z5]

Ukraine. There is only one language in Ukraine and that is Ukraine. Everything Soviet union and Russian eliminate it. Be proud to be Ukraine

[@paddywakk5635]

Mark needs to listen and hear what the Ukrainians are saying about negotiation's. They will not give one sq inch to Russia as it will prove they can do what they have done since 2014 and keep reattacking until then achieved what they want.

[@dianeheddon7093]

s the shites.

[@JasonBlack66]

1:34 I love that picture!

[@adrianappleyard4005]

Another great interview.

[@donotmislead]

The negotiated settlement over Crimea is completely impossible even in theory, the peninsula can only be liberated by Ukrainian army and no other way around. Ukrainians captured, raided or liberated Crimea countless times since the 10th century, while no single army in history was able to defend it.

[@terjeoseberg990]

There’s nothing to negotiate. Putin has been free to withdraw from Ukraine any time he wants since he started this war. In fact, since 2014 Putin has been free to withdraw from Ukraine. If he doesn’t choose to withdraw, he’ll be given no other choice.

[@dianeheddon7093]

@@terjeoseberg990 he will get blown up probably sooner or not too much later the murderer.

[@terjeoseberg990]

@@dianeheddon7093, The sooner the better.

[@CatalystD9]

I think when ATACMS or Taurus Missiles are provided cluster variants are more likely .. they will be effective against trenches massed troops barracks bases fuel dumps airfields radar and other sensitive systems .. single point munitions would be more useful to take down the bridge or Specific Whole buildings in Moscow .. so More controversial than cluster bombs which they are using regardless of opinion .. 🙏💙💛

[@gerryhouska2859]

pooTin's orcs have been using cluster bombs on civilian targets from day one of the invasion. Slava Ukraine, blyat pooTin and his orcs!

[@RyanBrown-nx8dw]

Honestly ur getting naybe 15 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@kiabtoomlauj6249]

#1, ATACMS are over $1M a piece, so Ukraine isn't getting more than a dozen or two, at a time, if that. #2, the Ukrainians in general are NOT allowed to use American and NATO weapons outside of Ukraine (so, no Moscow targets are going to be in danger from US and NATO supplied weapons: that likely means the Ukrainians could use ATACMS on that mighty Putin Bridge only on a very small section that touches the soil of Crimea & not the other 99.9% of the bridge in the open sea of Azov). Only domestically developed weapons platforms (air and water drones, etc), by Ukraine, may be used against Russian assets inside Russia. #3 that leaves the very scarce ATACMS units provided being used only against the most important (dozen or two) tactical or strategic assets in the Russian armed forces (e.g., very senior officers in meetings, to important headquarters, to very import rail hubs & major bridges Russians depend on for asset transports, which, when destroyed, takes months & tens of millions to repair, etc). #4, that means the ATACMS missiles and the F-16/Gripen they will have, late 2023 to mid 2024 (the 2 dozen to 50 or so units... Sweden likely will offer the Ukrainian 6 to 12 of Gripens, too, once F-16s are delivered), while important as noted, wouldn't be "game changer" weapons... the two/three new assets would just allow the Ukrainians to stretch the already very stretched Russian logistics even further... because both deal accurately and in very fast timing Russian targets many DOZENS of miles further into Russian occupied lands than what the Ukrainians are able to currently do against Russians... In other words, once the Ukrainians have some decent defensive & offensive capability at current NATO grade level ---- Patriots, F-16s, ATACMS, Storm Shadow/Scalp, SAMP/T (France & Italy), IRIS-T (Germany), etc. mean NATO grade capability --- it is going to be very, very hard to Russia to fight effectively INSIDE Ukraine, in all of the lands/provinces Russians currently occupied....

[@genevievemariaforde1477]

Thank you! Best wishes - Genevieve Forde Aotearoa Planet Earth

[@martinMD]

Kate always asks the right questions

[@bradastonk3422]

I kinda definitely fancy kate a bit...alot 😅, great interviews though with the best guests 👌 and Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 #vpdfo

[@michaelmazowiecki9195]

Speaker claims a 500 miles range! He should get his facts right! The Storm Shadows have a 250km range which is about 160 miles.

[@CONTACTLIGHTTOMMY]

Depends on the model. Some export variants do have shorter range. I think max is around 350 miles.

[@keithbenfield9238]

Excellent interview well researched thank you.

[@nestoramado9680]

This negotiation should be done without giving any territory.

[@maneshipocrates2264]

Don't bet on Herr Pootin negotiating. He has vowed to continue and wait for Herr trumpf. Trust poo-thing at your own peril.

[@dpelpal]

He's gonna take "Kyiv in _THREE DAYS!_

[@s0ycapitan]

PDS and TDS co-morbidity. I fear you are in for a bad 2024.

[@dpelpal]

@@s0ycapitan With the way the ruble dropped today, I think there won't be a 2024 for russia. It'll be 1995 all over again

[@maneshipocrates2264]

I am not. If trumpf wins, it will never affect me in any way. Those who will mostly suffer will be his supporters.@@s0ycapitan

[@robertatkins9419]

I suppose you think you're being funny with these pathetic names you give. All you are in fact being is a juvenile back in the school playground

[@richardfinnigan7458]

The ones being sent have 190 miles range and they are cluster munitions, that's very useful but not a game changer.

[@dianeheddon7093]

i still think nato usa uk will attack alltogether later

[@druttan3752]

Mark "Melbrook's twin" really knows his stuff and gave very realistic views, Thanks

[@mikeevans7381]

And if he did know how many Storm Shadow missiles the Ukraine has I'm sure he's not going to tell you. At least I hope not. 🤔😐🇺🇸

[@orangadil9100]

They are panicking 😅😅😅😅

[@newshound64]

One of the limitations on the ATACMS missiles that the US is giving to Ukraine is that they are mostly the kind with cluster bombs. Ukraine probably wants the shaped warheads that could blow up a few of the lanes of the Kursk bridge.

[@mebsrea]

Taking out a few airfields packed with Russian tactical aviation would be quite useful, though. In particular, the attack helicopters that have played a major part in stymieing the Ukrainian offensive lack the range to be both stationed outside ATACMS range and usable on the battlefield. Every Ka-52 destroyed represents a loss of 1-2% of Russia’s usable anti-armor helicopter fleet.

[@yurilytviak9066]

This is likely the best interviewer TR has…

[@raulgarcia8705]

I like the approach and format of this show. Thankyou Kate.

[@jacobschnberg5382]

Ukraine has great success with hitting supply-stores and supply-routes ! Every time Ukraine can hit a little further , the Russians have to move their ammunition stores : --- Russia has more than 200 000 troops on the frontlines and they need a lot of supplies ! Russia fire some 10000 155 artillery shells EVERY DAY! --- This is quite a logistic task ! When Ukraine get the ability to the hit those supplies then The Russian troops have much less ability to fight

[@philupson4561]

This guy is lost. Storm shadows don't have near that kind of range - the kerch bridge would be toast.

[@loyalist5736]

The storm shadow the UK has ,has that range but the ones they have sent to Ukraine have not ...pluss the warhead is 450 pounds.

[@mebsrea]

Permanently wrecking a bridge is hard. Blowing a few holes in the roadbed, sure, but destroying bridge piers is very, very difficult.

[@eduardos.366]

Nice interview, Kate.

[@michaelillingworth6433]

Crimea is Ukrainian territory and it would be a thorn in the side of Ukraine to leave it in Russian hands. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦❤️❤️❤️🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦❤️❤️

[@Drew-gi5dw]

Ukraine is already making Crimea untenable. Ukraine cannot negotiate to surrender territory. ATACMS actually allow them to do the only thing they cannot do now and destroy what’s left of the Kerch Bridge and attack ships supplying Crimea and Kherson, which Ukraine is doing presently with limited success

[@dianeheddon7093]

they will winxx

[@michaelhenault1444]

The interviewer is well prepared as usual. So much more satisfying than average media reporting. Thanks 🙏

[@stevenmailman5727]

Very good.

[@deecee1522]

LIBERATE CRIMEA❤‍🔥

[@StevenSheridan31416]

Not very informed guest regarding the attack on Sevastopol. The Ukrainian tactics of multi-wave drone and missile attacks are well known and discussed on KZbin etc.

[@jonduncombe2658]

Never ending great interview again! Thank you for very informent video. Kate your great. 👍

[@brianholmes3547]

Very good interview,

[@focalfusion]

AtackMs fly 3 x faster than Storm Shadow

[@TremereTT]

it's a rocket

[@foreverhungry84]

strike me deeper daddy

[@mebsrea]

True, but in a ballistic trajectory that means they’re more easily detected at a distance and potentially engaged by air defense systems. Both have their use cases.

[@richardcox3713]

If Russia leaves then there is little need to negotiate until Russia ask politely in order to get the economy back up and running. Putin has to go as this war is his not Russia’s.

[@Brian-om2hh]

Indeed. Those 1400 sanctions are biting, despite what Putin says.....

[@trueviking5406]

Good stuff, but.. the ATACMS has a longer range than the Storm Shadow

[@jamesboekbinder3967]

Very interesting!

[@tonupharry]

Bunker Babushka has lost nothing , he remains a military genius .

[@delta7554]

three days still waiting.

[@dpelpal]

@@delta7554 I don't think anybody will forget putin screaming his whole "Kyiv in 3 days" lol.

[@neilwani1178]

@@dpelpal Did they take Kiev in 3 days? What kind of person would plan that!

[@stephenroldan5107]

Military genius? He wasn't even in the military .. which part has been genius? Losing your fleet to drones?

[@tonupharry]

An old man that sits at the end of a very long table would plan taking kiev in 3 days. He had his army pack parade uniforms instead of ammo 😂👍 Hes a genius

[@erniefasbender4939]

Ukraine needs long range missiles now. It's the only way they have any chance of winning this war, especially without fast jets.

[@dpelpal]

If Ukraine took back all of Kherson and Kharkiv without so much as rifles, I think the rest of Ukraine won't be a problem. Russia has lost this war, it's only a matter of time now.

[@ninjasixrr]

@@dpelpalto much western media I’m afraid!

[@tonupharry]

I like the begging videos posted by ruzzian soldiers on the front line. Just about to be overrun . They are so bewildered and confused that their army is a joke, not like the recruiting poster at all 😂

[@jackforman561]

it would certainly be easier with long range missiles, but there is something to be said about their newly developed domestic long range drones. I wonder if the threat of these will keep the Russians from attacking civilian infrastructure this winter like they did last winter. In any case, I am too all for suppling Ukraine with long range missiles. It will give them more options and it is about time Ukraine starts hitting back where it hurts the Russians the most. Putin has elections coming up in March, so he will be particularly weak this winter

[@dancahill9585]

Why would anyone in Ukraine agree to a negotiated settlement with Russia after Russia has already violated the Budapest Memorandum and the Minsk agreements? A Russian signature on an agreed settlement is utterly worthless.

[@rubenjimenez3873]

Beautiful interviewer. ❤Great information.

[@terjeoseberg990]

There’s nothing to negotiate. Putin has been free to withdraw from Ukraine any time he wants since he started this war. In fact, since 2014 Putin has been free to withdraw from Ukraine. If he doesn’t choose to withdraw, he’ll be given no other choice.

[@jberkeley1195]

The russian 🤡 admiral he be dead☠️ ⚰️if he wasn't he would be mocking the afu for missing & that storm shadows are useless 😂 Slava ukraini🔱💪🇺🇦🇬🇧

[@wapiti3750]

Kate is so cute! The girl is a question machine, one after another. Just one last question - very reminiscent of Detective Columbo.

[@JustinTimeEnglishClip]

Valuable information. Thank you both!

[@officialsnufkin]

Yeah, let's "negotiate" with Putin. We can sign some papers, like the Budapest Memorandum. When Russia signed papers guaranteeing the territorial integrity of Ukraine. Putin is known for sticking to his word, and never lying. He can definitely be trusted.

[@Brian-om2hh]

Well I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him.....

[@dianeheddon7093]

yep he has no integrity he is slime and sly you are correct.