Atheist Presupp Deconverts Room of Muslims Saving Them From Islam

[@lukasrodriguez5864]

Starts at 2:20 de nada, happy new year 🎉

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Thank you! Yes and happy new year to you!

[@MartinMensch]

Another fellow portugues speaker, feliz ano novo, happy new year y'all

[@WE_R_DNA]

Dude TACO you made a song with my favorite line of all time! Love it! Joel from Joel reads the bible has a bunch of songs too that he made up that clown on theist. Great job dude!

[@realBreakfasttacos]

That song was actually made by Martin! Glad you enjoyed it. I thought it was awesome!

[@ianchisholm5756]

The opening song is brilliant!!

[@realBreakfasttacos]

I love it so much too!!!

[@Nope-hz1ux]

She unironically said 'look at the trees' by the end lol

[@realBreakfasttacos]

LOL

[@Harambe_Banana]

Anyone watching this in 2024?

[@smolderingtitan]

@@Harambe_Banana for now!

[@johns1625]

Anyone watching this the exact same moment I am?

[@realBreakfasttacos]

WATCHING IN THE FUTURE!!!!

[@ibelieveingaming3562]

No. Time travel is impossible.

[@Harambe_Banana]

@@ibelieveingaming3562 Wait what, really? ):

[@ibelieveingaming3562]

I love your dedication to illustrating the presise model logic that leads to faith in nothing! Its fantastic!

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Thank you!

[@northernbrother1258]

I love the flipping the presup script! 🤣

[@realBreakfasttacos]

What do you mean by flipping the presupp script? I'm an Atheist Presuppositional Apologist

[@eriness]

​@@realBreakfasttacosungodly based

[@ianchisholm5756]

Gotta say, the _Argumentum_ad_Genitalia_ (15:20) is a new one.

[@realBreakfasttacos]

LOL Yep!

[@rafaelallenblock]

Anyone here watching in 2025?

[@realBreakfasttacos]

I watched this one again today lol! I love that song.

[@rafaelallenblock]

@@realBreakfasttacos 🤣

[@ibelieveingaming3562]

​@realBreakfasttacos yo that song is fuckin fire 🔥

[@eriness]

13:20 literally god of the gaps. great job

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Thank you so much!

[@eriness]

holy moly these people; they say they agree with evolution, yet they say we are perfectly designed. You have to pick one, the mechanisms of evolution are not perfect, we breathe and eat from the same hole for energys sake

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Excellent point!

[@eatsbugs4577]

The argument really flows over guitar and drums

[@realBreakfasttacos]

I totally agree. Martin did a great job with the song!

[@Weirdaman]

2025 came from 2024, so yet again something came from something. Cheers!

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Amazing point!

[@HarryNicNicholas]

yeah but whatabout my 11 days?

[@louseveryann2181]

Is the period of time that we call 2024 a conscious entity that watches over you, knows everything and will rescue you from this utter dread we call reality?

[@k3n0ju]

Nice theme song!

[@realBreakfasttacos]

RIGHT! Thank Martin for that one! He made one for Gregory too.

[@chrisxdeboy]

The opening riff reminds me of RAM Ranch.

[@rafaelallenblock]

The cherry on top is the definition of the 'necessary' fundamental universal quantum field.

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Agreed!

[@smolderingtitan]

I'm chuffed that you used the song! All blessings for the New Year to you and all your loved ones!

[@realBreakfasttacos]

It was too good to not use there, lol. I thought it was a perfect fit for the conversation.

[@smolderingtitan]

@realBreakfasttacos yes, I like the idea of segmenting it.

[@rafaelallenblock]

LOL where can I dl this track?

[@realBreakfasttacos]

@@rafaelallenblock I'm not sure you can, LOL!

[@beardoftears]

Wow what a timeless banger

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Glad you enjoyed that! Thank Martin for that one!

[@Peter_Wendt]

Happy New Year! Good work with all the deconversions.

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Happy New Year to you as well! Thank you!

[@InformedTheology]

12:20 Inductive arguments, as Russel demonstrated, are always formally fallacious. These arguments are great vs. random unsuspecting Muslims, I guess.

[@realBreakfasttacos]

It's always funny to me when religious people come to my channel and don't know what they are talking about. Inductive arguments are not about certainty, they are about probability. They are also evaluated on strength/cogency. They are not evaluated in the same way deductive arguments are. The argument works against you too.

[@InformedTheology]

@@realBreakfasttacos Probability within naturalistic epistemology is ultimately useless, of course. With any observation that could be repeated indefinitely, the probability of it's truth is mathmatically 0%. Karl Popper who was no theist taught me this. Every empircal claim has a 0% probability of being true. What a marvelously useless worldview.

[@cloud656]

I love how the entire room went silent lmao

[@realBreakfasttacos]

LOL great point! It's all about presence.

[@andrespacheco6730]

there are a lot of scientific facts in the Quran in the same way that there are a lot of historical facts in the prophecies of Nostradamus

[@johns1625]

"When you open your head it's all gooey and looks like worms" - The Quran, probably

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Great point!

[@rootsheepnot]

What scientific facts are they? Nostradamus predictions a lot have failed, I can make a load of predictions where some might come true and most will not….

[@realBreakfasttacos]

@@rootsheepnot So they lived and gained information and some of that "scientific information" is in the Quran. Many old texts have knowledge from the time. I think the Quran has really close to the amount of bones in the human body if I remember correctly. But it is like a compilation of the knowledge available so a lot of it was false back then and doesn't actually cohere with the way the world works. It also mentions humans came from prior types of humans if I remember correctly.

[@rootsheepnot]

@ If it’s the word of God shouldn’t the amount of bones be correct and not close to? I’ve read a few passages where it gets things completely wrong,….

[@command.cyborg]

Good Show! 😊👍

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it!

[@thinkingsapien6338]

Good point Taco!

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Thank you!

[@KEvronista]

good point, sape! KEvron

[@johns1625]

12:37 Yeah I get it, but don't you ever just look at the trees? 🤔

[@realBreakfasttacos]

I do, but I guess they don't!

[@johanharto5076]

Long time follower! I love how much you use the watchmen analogy 😂

[@realBreakfasttacos]

I am glad you enjoy the watchmaker analogy!!

[@Bilbo383]

Taco made another video? Maybe god is real...

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Silly Bilbo

[@jayb5596]

Quantum fields are not natural processes. A process isn't natural, otherwise its not a process. A process is a natural part of this universe but processing is not an inanimate process. Emergence requires something to emerge out of and into. For example the world wide web or internet, emerged out of an architecture into a dynamically active network that can now enable long distance communication on a global scale. That didn't emerge out of nothing it emerged out of sophisticated processes which are guided by consciousness. Take away the architecture and the consciousness involved in the construction of it and the digital space that emerged, would cease to exist. It would collapse back into itself as it has no foundation supporting it. Energy can't structure itself without physical guidance. A quantum field with no quantum computer represents nothing but decoherence and you my friend are decoherent, many people are but not everyone is decoupled from reality friend.

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Quantum fields are natural and physical dingleberry. They are just fundamental fields of energy. The necessary being foundation is the universal quantum field. You are just confused.

[@johanharto5076]

I love it!

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Thank you so much for watching!

[@rafaelallenblock]

LMAO

[@realBreakfasttacos]

Glad you enjoyed that!

[@rafaelallenblock]

@@realBreakfasttacos You're my new hero and I hate you. I've been working on a book turning apologetics on its head and you managed to reduce it down to 27 words.😘👍

[@realBreakfasttacos]

@@rafaelallenblock That is awesome to hear! Thank you!