Officers DENY Courtroom Access

[@AuditTheAudit]

Thanks for taking the time to watch. Hit that subscribe button if you learned something new!

[@moist.teabag]

does he need an attorney could he not represent himself he has all the evedence

[@patrickdecambra2219]

Is this a repost? I'm pretty sure I've seen this before

[@georgekot6377]

One thing I can't understand is why you don't have like 10.000.000 subs !!! I love this channel .

[@jeremiahhall4083]

Your channel is very educational. I appreciate the work you put into these videos. Keep it up

[@l_Live_In_Oregon]

I already subscribed. But I did learn something. Do I unsub and the sub again???

[@G.GordonMidi]

"It's *not normal* to be interested in the law!" --Law Enforcement

[@erikjarandson5458]

"Interest in the law is clearly abnormal. Not even one of my coworkers gives a shit about it!"

[@animaanimus8011]

It was almost physically painful to watch this video. Oof

[@bonzai2380]

Law enforcement does not want the public to know your rights or how the justice system works so they can abuse you and your rights without getting caught. The cop at the county building should be fired for his abusive behavior and violating this mans rights. Where does he think it is his building. This type of law enforcement officer needs to be weeded out.

[@Christystlouis]

Bull I love to watch trials. It's called learning from experience.

[@tylerhill1751]

Lawyers and Judges: "Am I a joke to you?"

[@helipilotuh1]

Have a feeling that the deputy was placed at the courthouse for a reason and it wasn’t because of his stunning intellect.

[@patriciagarrett4243]

Dangerous for him (an old bull) to be out in the public arena, someone might mistake him for a law enforcement officer.

[@Cheepchipsable]

"We need someone to guard Janitorial supplies - you're the only man we trust!"

[@AshenTechDotCom]

they prob hoped he would keep quiet and not cause more problems... farva type+bully.. really pathetic.. hes such a coward...my gods...wonder how many people he shot/took shots at/pulled his gun on, when he wasnt stationed at the court house...

[@cogidubnus1953]

I suspect he's serving out time until retirement and he's no frigging use for anything, anywhere else

[@OG-zr3bw]

No one becomes a cop for their intellect.

[@D4veJap4n]

Absolutely beautiful. He feels scared of the guy and asks for some big boys to come help him. ~When they arrive he transforms into tough guy mode and gets right in his face.

[@Hahah100]

It’s crazy man.. so sad how these dudes let power get to there head

[@BeachNMexico]

tryany!

[@humblechops2267]

@@BeachNMexico Tyranny. There you go. The spelling police will jail you if you do it again lol.

[@JasonEisenberg81]

@@humblechops2267 I think @Jesse Tait did it on purpose to distract the spelling police so @Womp 55 wouldn't get caught...

[@jblue8436]

a gang only buck up when they have u outnumbered

[@jetroar17]

"It's strange and suspicious to want to watch court cases..." I guess the 10 million people that watched Judge Judy every day need to identify themselves to police immediately!

[@wvrjl]

I went in and watched Court proceedings. They were bail hearings. The prosecutor asked if I was waiting for someone, and I said no I'm just watching. Then they left me alone. Lots of people watch Court proceeding. In fact, when I was in grade seven, the whole class went to watch court proceedings. That guy looking for court proceedings was not acting suspicious, but the deputy sure was.

[@biohazardace]

They classify judge Judy tv not law or court.

[@jetroar17]

@@biohazardace You must be fun at parties..

[@supermarioryder2362]

And Court Cam on A&E

[@projectswithpaula5897]

I went for a college course. The judge thanked the students for caring to learn. Yep.

[@GSXK4]

He's not in the court for "no reason." He's a curious citizen and wants to learn about the law and court proceedings.

[@Exchange_IDs]

Williston is the best place to go to watch a corrupt legal system. Unfortunately, they are the biggest bullies in turn.

[@DOLfirst]

@Julie Z some people do not have the financial means or time for a formal education. If the law students are allowed in to observe why shouldn't anyone. Also, perhaps this man's interest will encourage him to seek a formal education. He was calm and respectful. He would probably make a great judge.

[@DOLfirst]

@@DorkVader26 yes, in cases such as that it is understandable and acceptable but I gather the doors were locked or guarded to prevent intrusion? Generally if the doors are unlocked the proceedings are open for observation. I was involved in a hearing where the proceedings were also private because it involved a minor but we were in a room specifically designated for that purpose.

[@DOLfirst]

@@DorkVader26 also, I believe the deputy stated that it was a civil case the man was observing not a family court matter. I was a juror in a civil case involving business matters and there were several observers. It was quite interesting and lasted five full days.

[@Phil231937]

no, he wants to find things HE considers wrong.

[@Dead_Guy_Bob]

"I let you talk. You're not gonna shush me." Fucking gold.

[@dan.rice.]

Agreed! I was SO glad to see he called out the cop for talking over him.

[@Skyte100]

I like the cop let him talk.

[@iain2080]

I'm a law student here in Ireland and although our law is very different from the states one of the best ways to learn and understand the judiciary is to view court proceedings in person

[@giinks]

facts

[@fishroy1997]

Yes! Watching Law and Order is not a way to learn about how the court system works.

[@grannygear1001]

Love your dear Ireland. My grandfathers were both born there and great great grandmothers. ❤️

[@anonymousrex5207]

Unfortunately far too many people here in the U.S. think they "know the law" and "know their rights" when they don't know jack shit. Comments on this video and others like it are sufficient evidence to show just how little people know and understand about the police, the courts and the legal system in general. Glad to see more people taking an interest in the law and learning what they can about their legal system so they can go on to (hopefully) educate others.

[@Phyoomz]

Absolutely!

[@buster5209]

It wasnt AIMLESS wandering, he found what he was looking for and seated himself civilly and peacefully without any disturbance.

[@wildboar7473]

must of felt the dude was lying with not one hearing, the Deputy offended because revealed as a Liar, not his job to lie and claim no hearing.

[@alexandermacgowan9951]

"civilly and peacefully' while black sitting next to white women!!! HE'S GUILTY!!!...and he must have outstanding warrants...he's black!

[@wvrjl]

Exactly. I've done the exact same thing. I've walked into the public building, and started looking for the appropriate trial that I wanted to watch. It's not unusual at all. Definitely not suspicious.

[@GThu1]

He should not have to wander if that security F grade choose not to lie, tells the truth and directs him to the proceeding.

[@funnyfarm5555]

@@wvrjl I have gone into more than one courthouse on business and went to 4+ offices before I was done, so I guess I am suspicious. Perhaps one needs to call and get someone on the phone besides mr Fatman(where is his cape?) and find out what trials are scheduled where and when; perhaps they have it posted on a website. Once you find out that information then walk straight into the particula courtroom and have a seat.

[@alfredmartinez6166]

Law students are encouraged to attend hearings of all kinds.

[@mikoto7693]

As do forensic science students. In fact it's often required by one of the modules. At least in the UK.

[@kayanurshiya3778]

@@mikoto7693 lol in the Netherlands as well and we weren’t even doing any law related school but just regular high school. We were studying how the justice system works and were expected per 5 students to attend a trial and write essay about it.

[@LemonRush7777]

@@kayanurshiya3778 Wow, really? I envy your country, I wish mine had basic law classes in high school.

[@salvagemonster3612]

Well I don’t think his jacket said YALE LAW SCHOOL. Maybe Midas muffler?

[@alfredmartinez6166]

@@salvagemonster3612 most hearings are open to the public. Regardless of what his jacket says, you have no idea what or why he was there. Whether he is enrolled in Yale or a local community college, morale support for either the plaintiff or the accused or just plain curious. Unless it is specified as a closed hearing the public can attend, to include the Press. And now with the rise of social media, we are all the Press.

[@davidmaxwaterman]

"Given that Mr Collier *aimlessly* wondered the halls of the city building..." - er, how can you know that it was 'aimless'? It seems clear that his aim was to find a trial to observe...that is an aim.

[@6StimuL84]

Exactly......

[@Exchange_IDs]

Royce watched the cameras and stepped away from the screen to get this guy.

[@rickjason215]

Also, it was a courthouse. The purpose of which is to have court cases. It was highly unlikely there were no court cases.

[@iwir3d]

He mentioned he was aiming for a court room initially. But when told there were none, he walked around the building without intent to walk into a court room. Sorta close to aimlessly but not quite because while he was told there are no proceedings, he still was taking a tour of the building to better familiarize himself with the surroundings. Sounds like an aim to me. These officers should be fired and claimed there behavior to oppress the constitution is "suspicious". Why would any armed officer intentionally violate the constitution. I also like the guys response that what is suspicious to you is not suspicious to him. He is absolutely right. Here where I live it's almost illegal to call the police. 100% of the time they will state "We did not see it happen, so it's not illegal but you did see you call the police and we can arrest you for it"... and sadly I wish I was joking, and no I am not black, I am white they do this shit to everyone. I cant even walk down the road I live on (in the country) without being stopped and demanded to show ID with no reasonable suspicion (I live in South Bend, Indiana) and if you try and call to report the county police the operator just never answers the phone. And if you try and leave a message with anyone else they generally do not followup.

[@Mortlupo]

@@iwir3d i.e. he rightly didn't believe the officer especially since he found one of those said "non-court" OPEN-TO-THE-PUBLIC court proceedings.

[@billcox8870]

It's almost like they don't want the general public to understand how court proceedings work

[@giftedfox4748]

I can see why, it removes the fear the cops can have over the normal folks if we know how to fight off their dumb fake tickets.

[@michaeld1906]

They don’t want the public to see how they violate our rights

[@RandyRandersonthefamous]

@@giftedfox4748 The worst thing possible is for everyone to know how "the system works" check out "hidden secrets of money episode 4"

[@dillonoickle5841]

the fact that basic laws arent a manditory class is insane ive looked into alot of shit later on in life but i was taught the laws to the country i live in at all. like what?

[@billcox8870]

@@michaeld1906 at the end of the day our ignorance is their strength. The more you know, the less they can manipulate you.

[@foogod4237]

"This is a civil trial. You have no reason, really, to be in there." Law students and lawyers do exactly this sort of thing _all the time,_ for perfectly legitimate reasons. There are also tons of possible reasons why any citizen might want to observe how a civil trial works, and ways that it is different from criminal proceedings, for example. I also really wish he had pointed out "The only reason I was wandering around was because of your behavior. If you had not lied to me about there being no court cases, and simply told the truth that there was one in this room, then I would have gone straight here to begin with and I wouldn't have _had_ to 'wander around' to find it."

[@EarlHayward]

Stumbled across this and had the exact same thought... A requirement of one of my early law school courses was to attend trials... In short, during a couple of those trials, everyone who was a possible juror (which was usually everyone but me) was asked to stand and recite a few words... However I continued to sit, as a result I was usually approached and asked why (by officers)... I simply stated I was a law student attending a trial open to the public (not all are open to the public, usually family court, etc...) and that was the end of it. ... I mention this because I think that such an educational requirement (and the experience gained from such a requirement) is important... Basically, I learned that officers are generally not competent with respect to the weight and authority of the law, are knowledgeable enough to know when to continue engagement or walk away, and that most do not have malicious intent. ... Furthermore, viewing matters from the officer's side, which I still continue to do with all encounters and matters, they almost always have a valid reason for their actions. However, I should qualify this statement and acknowledge that officers are generally not very great communicators... Accordingly, rather than assert the risk present as their training is to raise their voice and state orders to those they are confronting... And, while confidence and authority are important to safety, behaving so prematurely (or unnecessarily) escalates the encounter in a negative direction. ... The problem I see is that law enforcement officers (generally) do not hold a juris doctorate; yet, for some reason, it appears people have an expectation that everyone in law enforcement would possess the skills, knowledge, education, and experience similiar to that of a practicing litigator. Statistically speaking, officer initiated encounters with the public are similar across all ethnic, gender, and age demographics... It is the outcome that is not proportional to demographics... Given that officer initiated contacts are aligned with demographics, and appear to be without prejudice, I would argue that it is the outliers driving conflict and misrepresentation of key information; which is clearly inconsistent with our Constitution, our founders' intent, and basic societal expectations.

[@kurticeberg4566]

@@EarlHaywardoutstanding comment thank you

[@alexandermacgowan9951]

You missed the point! IF YOU ARE BLACK, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SIT WITH WHITE FOLK IN OUR COURTROOMS...UNLESS YOU ARE THE ONE BEING TRIED! ALL BLACK PEOPLE ARE CRIMINALS OR MUST HAVE OUTSTANDING WARRANTS THAT WE CAN ARREST YOU FOR AFTER WE VIOLATE YOUR 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND GO THROUGH YOUR POCKETS AT GUNPOINT TO GET YOUR IDENTIFICATION...THEN WE ARREST YOU...THEN YOU GET INTO THE COURTROOM! IF YOU ARE BLACK MAKE SURE YOU FIRST CHECK BEFORE VISITING A SMALL PO DUNK TOWN IN NORTH DAKOTA TO SEE IF THEY HAVE A LARGE KU KLUX KLAN MEMBERSHIP BEFORE MAKING YOUR VISIT...AND MAKE SURE YOU ARE OUT OF TOWN WHEN THE SUN GOES DOWN! THE AVERAGE SENTENCING IN THIS TOWN FOR BLACK PEOPLE IS MINIMUM 10 YEARS WORKING THE COTTON FIELDS AND PICKING WATERMELON!

[@wvrjl]

Yes. I've sat in trials that had nothing to do with me, because I wanted to know how the process worked in practicality. Although I did have lawyers asking me if I was with somebody who have been arrested. But once I told them I was just observing, they left me alone.

[@alexandermacgowan9951]

@@wvrjl If it's not a "closed court", it's not really anyone's business but your own what you are doing sitting watching the court proceedings as long as you abide by the rules of the court. I'm surprised anyone questioned the reasoning behind your being in the courtroom observing the proceedings?

[@gardener5857]

Where is this filmed? Where is it that a deputy doesn't wear a clean uniform in the courthouse? Where do they allow a deputy to look like that while he's on duty? Of course he needs back up. He's so out of shape he couldn't catch a granny in her walker. This is shameful.

[@genneanshepherd8984]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@constanttraveler]

He is in contempt of court. He's not wearing the uniform of the day, but instead demeans the courtroom with his filthy golf shirt

[@Strykar86]

He is off duty. That's his side job to support his eating habits. Also, North Dakota doesn't have physical fitness requirements. Required training includes: 60 hours every 3 years, up to 20 can be done online, plus annual firearms proficiency.

[@toscatattertail9813]

Minot, North Dakota, they said it within the first minute of the video beginning.

[@DillonV]

Tosca Tattertail this is the Williston

[@doms.6701]

"it's not normal for people to want to watch a court case" That is bang up logic. Up there with "if you have nothing to hide let me search you".

[@berrybestfarmer9614]

Guess he isn't aware of how many popular tv dramas are doing exactly that.

[@Franchise-p7g]

@@berrybestfarmer9614 was just thinking that lol like it’s a while network called court tv lol

[@dustinkfc6633]

Yep it’s no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say.

[@lostchild06]

Shit, if I had a day off and there was no covid I would. That is interesting.

[@brentfarvors192]

Plot Twist: He becomes a lawyer, and SUES them himself for OBVIOUSLY violating his rights...How could they NOT vote in his favor?

[@shawn2481]

The only reason it was suspicious was because the security guy lied.

[@daviddetorres2667]

Systemic racism on full display in my opinion. If this had been a white guy I don’t think there would have been any problem whatsoever. Colored people don’t belong in court rooms unless they’re led in, in handcuffs.

[@Maltesfilm]

@@daviddetorres2667 Be carful calling it Racism when the only thing pointing to it is that the man happened to be black, which doesn’t say much on it’s own.

[@daviddetorres2667]

@@Maltesfilm my observation is based on the aggregate of occurrences where POC are denied basic human rights when it comes to interactions with police officers and access to public places. Being that I am a POC I speak with experience and authority.

[@Maltesfilm]

@@daviddetorres2667 You speak with experience not with authority. It’s possible there could be a racial element to this, but just because there is a racial problem at large does not mean every case involves racial profiling or racism. We should treat the cops like we want to be treated, innocent until proven guilty. The problem with always assuming racism or racial biases in cases like this, is at some point the police and authorities will become scared or hesitant to do their job when it involves someone of color, because they don’t want to be labeled as racist. Look at how things have progressed in Sweden, that’s not an ideal situation either. Yes racism is a problem, but abuse of authority and immunity is, I think, the bigger problem. We should condemn, reprimand, and hold the police accountable for wrongdoings we can prove they have committed, not ones we only suspect them of committing.

[@daviddetorres2667]

@@Maltesfilm my authority to speak to this issue is because I am a POC that has endured the racism in America. Law enforcement should be a more guarded when dealing with POC to avoid being labeled racist. If they have that in mind I think they might eventually drop the inherent racial bias that dominates their interactions with POC. I’m biracial. I’m old enough to remember how my white half treated me and my siblings. I remember having to use colored only restrooms while my white mother was shamed for having dark children. Not much has really changed. POC are still suspect for no other reason than the color of their skin.

[@wonder_9315]

Deputy: We’re suspicious that you might be acting uncivil in the court room Also Deputy: **Proceeds to loudly escalate argument right outside the door, prompting someone inside to tell them to walk further away**

[@walkinharmonyhomestead2888]

It is a sad day in these United States when it is “suspicious” for a citizen to learn about the laws of his land from the source, simply because his fellow citizens couldn’t be bothered to.

[@dontaylor7315]

Exactly! We're citizens and we should walk around in our public insitutions now and then. Those institutions work for us (theoretically) so it behooves us to check out what kind of job they're doing.

[@rodh1404]

I honestly think the deputy had reasonable cause for suspicion. But working as security in a courthouse, the deputy must have at least some understanding of proportionality, and his actions were in no way proportional to the citizen's "crime". "crime" is /s, btw.

[@Exchange_IDs]

The williston justice system protects its old ways with excessive force.

[@drewken7732]

His suspicious activity wasn't in the court room. It was walking and wondering the halls all the way to the 3rd floor. Duh!!!

[@Sasquach1312]

@@drewken7732 Which is legal for him to do. If he was going into areas closed to the public that would be another matter.

[@fishroy1997]

The judge should have called the deputy into the court room and threatened him with contempt of court for removing the gentleman from the gallery thus causing a disturbance. If a judge doesn’t want you there they will sure as hell make it known, and clearly that was NOT the case here.

[@chinwenduchinwe586]

fishroy1997 You have said it. That idiot that called 911 to start trouble; and the two police that came to allow themselves to be used like flunkies for a deranged man...are evil deeds and evil seeds. All planted they will harvest. Just ludicrous behavior.

[@Phyoomz]

I mean, that assumes the judge had any idea what was going on. I'm sure they were focused on the trial.

[@vovin8132]

@@chinwenduchinwe586 The cops didn't really have much reason to ID they guy, aside from the deputy's insistence, but they were compelled to evict the guy for trespassing once the deputy demanded it. That is how trespassing works: once a representative of the building issues the trespass, then police have to enforce it.

[@1SCme]

@@vovin8132 I wouldn't put it as an absolute, but I would fault the man for not focusing on the deputy's attempt to prevent him from observing a public court session BEFORE he began walking around the building negating the claim of suspicion being the basis for removal from the premise. It is up to him to articulate to the arriving officers what happened and not follow every red herring claim put forth by the deputy. Given the information he and the deputy focused on, I believe the arriving officers acted appropriately, I would give them at least a B, with the only ding being that they didn't inquire more on the passing comment the deputy initially lied or the deputy claiming he had no reason for being there.

[@vovin8132]

@@1SCme None of that matters in terms of trespassing someone. All it takes is a representative of a building to inform of the trespass, and the police have to enforce it. It is not really up to the police to determine if the trespass is fair or not (unless the claim is made by somebody who is not an authority of the property, like say a visiting guest at a house vs the people who actually live there). However, this specific example is special in the sense that this takes place in a courthouse. The public has the right to be there by default. That being said, there is a common misconception that state property is public property, and there is a huge distinction between the two; just because it is publicly funded doesn't necessarily mean it is owned by the public. And by state, I am referring to the state apparatus/class, not the provincial state regimes of the USA. So technically, security at the courthouse can trespass people and get the police to come and enforce the trespass. This does not mean that the trespass is fair or legal, of course, but it places the onus to prove the reason for the trespass on the courthouse's authority, whom the deputy represents as security, or else it is straight up harassment. Like the narrator states, if the guy sued the courthouse's authority (which is the American state I guess?), then they would most likely side with him, because siding with the deputy would set massive precedents that would be used to deny the public from being in courthouses in the future. The deputy was obviously being a useless, egotistical prick, but he still had the authority to trespass anyone for any reason, and the practical way to deal with it is making the situation public so the people above him take action to maintain public relations.

[@debunkthejunk1]

Can we stop trying to justify "suspicious" activity when it's legal and Constitutional? Everything is "suspicious" when you're ignorant.

[@viktorwillyam]

Why are you watching this video and taking the time to post a comment?! Seems awfully suspicious to me. I demand your identifications!

[@Aozora333]

When sheeple see something even slightly out of the ordinary they go into full anxiety mode.

[@Luvlieo]

Aozora ikr

[@debunkthejunk1]

@@Aozora333 The cops want people living in fear, it's job security. Police work isn't even in the top 10 most dangerous jobs but they justify violating people's rights, sometimes even killing them, because "they want to go home at night". "Report suspicious activity" just means easy money so they can look good and avoid solving crime. It's a pretty messed up system.

[@debunkthejunk1]

@Rechordian It's not just the mortality rate they include injury. There's danger all around us. Consttuction sites are dangerous the entire time they are active. You are more likely to be threatened with physical violence as a gas station attendant or working at a bar than as a cop. And yet somehow the police have people convinced the danger warrants giving up your rights and complying with unlawful orders for the sake of simplicity.

[@bmitch3020]

That cop seems emotionally unstable. It's probably not safe for him to have any weapons. Also you can't call someone out for walking the halls of a public building looking for the in session court room after you deliberately mislead them.

[@ScottWConvid19]

Deputy Krone to 911 dispatch: "He's big and I'm afraid of him, please send me any available officer! 😨" Also Deputy Krone once backup arrives: "I'M THE BIG DOG AROUND HERE!"

[@ambushbob5383]

His mom probably took him to Bennigans later that night to celebrate what a big strong police officer he was.

[@TheJuggtron]

They're a gang and their colour is Blue

[@michaeltruthson6262]

😂😂😂🤣😂😂🤣😂

[@VashXTrigun]

Ikr

[@corpsman1980]

@@ambushbob5383 I lol'd

[@hawk535]

This is "our building" that was such a perfect statement

[@andreajames3096]

Look at the GUT on this bully Tyrant. Has the gall to call this guy big. If he's big then what are you? Suspicious in the Court. Liars all of them. He must he Hungry. Give him a chocolate bar, oh won,t work still a tyrant

[@metlhead5413]

@@andreajames3096 Wrong chocolate should have used snickers.

[@TJ-kh2zc]

@@metlhead5413 You're not you when you're hungry. Have a Snickers.

[@Slackmana]

This comment didn't age well... lol

[@mariemontreal2518]

Correction. He said this is MY building!!

[@MahoneyBadger]

“Because people don’t normally do that.” But perhaps we should. We wanna complain about the legal process but nit educate ourselves on it?

[@kisstune]

I remember my US Government course in high school required us to visit a court room, or city council meeting, or county commissioners meeting.

[@drewthomas5779]

How many court TV shows are their on TV

[@MahoneyBadger]

@@drewthomas5779 Judge Judy is the one one I recognize as legitimate! lol

[@TRivera13]

@@drewthomas5779 But those shows wouldn't educate any one on criminal cases. As TV court shows are simply arbitration hearings.

[@user-njyzcip]

@@TRivera13 anyone who thinks tv wannabe courts are real courts is funny. Their "court orders" can't even make a party pay the other, all they can do is pay them money out of the producer's pockets

[@Jay-Niner]

"We've had issues in the past" is the lamest, most overused lie that cops use to violate citizens rights. If court's start accepting this as a replacement for reasonable suspicion, Americans' famous freedom is completely toast.

[@SloppyPuppy]

Bruh what famous freedom, I've never seen it served. America is like going to a steakhouse and getting served spotted dick.

[@Elementalism]

If their issues were so bad, why wouldnt they close the building?

[@JohnSmiffer]

I've always liked the "It's for your safety and mine. " It's never for your safety.

[@stephanosuk78]

We've had such security concerns we won't allow the public to enter.

[@satekeeper]

For real. And by the way, does the mythical location exist "we've never had any issues here, ever." ? Surely that weasely, water BS applies to literally every square inch of the country.

[@DarylRogan]

Pointing your finger at someone, repeatedly, is a quick way to lose respect.

[@JT-ok8te]

In the state of Rhode Island, it’s a secondary assault!

[@r0xjo0]

It is a quick way to getting your nose punched in.

[@107glen]

r0xjo0 took the words out my mouth.

[@PEB2631]

also simply assualt

[@chrisgordon5719]

Its also a good way to get your @$$ kicked. Especially if you wave your finger in their face and accuse them of something they didn't do.

[@jackal242]

This deputy needs to be fired. He was COMPLETELY out of line.

[@salvagemonster3612]

Normally on this channel I would say yes. I think maybe this was a fellow wanting a confrontation

[@LiquidJ]

@@salvagemonster3612 I know both of these individuals. You're absolutely correct. This guy is one of two people I know that regularly seek out confrontation for the sake of pumping their KZbin following. While I agree with the narrator's assessment of the situation as it pertains to the interaction, there's no excuse for setting out to cause a scene solely for the sake of a KZbin vid.

[@lilonespaz]

@@LiquidJ How does wishing to watch a court proceeding equal wanting to make a video for KZbin? The man didnt even record the interaction?

[@LiquidJ]

​@@lilonespaz My awareness of this person extends to more than just this one incident. Reading and comprehention are good skills. Generally this guy just seeks out confrontation for the sake of it.

[@lilonespaz]

@@LiquidJ i can read and I saw you said you know him but I was sticking to this particular incident that were watching here which wasn't at all what you stated.

[@jamesoverholt878]

I sat on a civil jury. The Judge explicitly said it was a public proceeding and he encouraged the public to attend

[@stephendavies8510]

The security guard is extremely suspicious, antagonistic, and a bare faced liar plus he fails miserably on the law and yet a totally innocent man who hasn't committed a crime is forced to leave the building because of an over zealous security guard who was on a power trip and couldn't bear someone who stood up to his tyrannical behaviour.

[@Ndqar]

He fails as a human.

[@samlucchese8928]

Sue!

[@goodcitizen-ft9bg]

Lots of big words Contextual language used well No filthy words or nasty comments… I give your comment a 10

[@randomaxe662]

I find it suspicious that the security cop lied about court being held that day. If he told the truth, he could have voiced his concerns at the start.

[@noahbohl2127]

He also pulled the guy out to tell him he has to behave if he’s watching the courtroom. This caused more of a disturbance than him just watching

[@johanlassen6448]

@@noahbohl2127 Only to then kick him out of the building. Logic flew out the window that day.

[@wildboar7473]

Deputy didnt like abnormal folks, no reason to attend so decided the guy had to leave. At last he found someone to bully, probably starved in that building.

[@alexandermacgowan9951]

@@wildboar7473 NOPE!!! HIS ONLY "OFFENSE" WAS BEING BLACK IN THIS HERE WHITE ONLY TOWN AND EXPECTING TO BE PERMITTED TO SIT WITH WHITE PEOPLE IN THE SAME COURTROOM...UNLESS HE'S THE ONE BEING TRIED AND CONVICTED! MORALE: DON'T VISIT SMALL WHITE ONLY TOWNS IN PO DUNK SOUTH DAKOTA IF YOU'RE BLACK!

[@brads0107able]

Also he wouldn't have had to walk around the building looking in every room

[@capngloval]

I did this a lot in the early 2000's. I wanted to know what was going on in the court house, I wanted to watch the public hearings, and it was air conditioned and my apartment was not. It's not strange at all.

[@jvillain9946]

Police: Why are you here. Derek: I want to learn more about the legal and court systems work. Police: We can't be having that. Obey my authoritaaay.

[@Bonbonbon739]

Lol cartman

[@eladzha]

What if a white young woman walk in and do the same? would they be as hostile?

[@prje1324]

@@eladzha Then the officer observing the woman loitering would have been considered suspicious. LOL.

[@wvrjl]

​@@eladzha- I bet no. When I did the same thing in Canada, nobody bothered me. Of course, the police aren't quite the tyrants in Canada that they are in the US, although I would say they are far from honest. I ambled around because I wasn't sure where the court session was, and then I finally stopped and asked somebody and they helped me out. The idea of calling 911, or whatever number he called, to get police simply because the guy asked him where the court proceedings where is RIDICULOUS. I'm quite disgusted by anybody backing that guard.

[@HelenaOfDetroit]

I was once ordered out of a civil courtroom by the judge. I was sitting quietly in the back with my partner, who was there for a traffic violation. The judge asked me why I was there, and I said it was to support my partner. She ordered me out anyway, even though there were a lot of people in the courtroom and I was the only one she singled out. I can only assume it was because my partner was a woman. And this was in Detroit.

[@bowlofcinder482]

Sure

[@stevekru6518]

I don’t understand because there is nothing suspicious, nefarious or sexual about two women or two men going to court together.

[@DeezShortzz]

3:05 “You’re gunna sit down there, watch, and be civil” ?????? This guy pulled him out of court to tell him to keep doing what he was doing !!!

[@DeezShortzz]

Its at that moment these officers should have realized what they were dealing with

[@vovin8132]

@@DeezShortzz The old guy was probably a senior cop, so the younger cops would have to just go along with it or face all kinds of BS themselves.

[@Exchange_IDs]

@@DeezShortzz these are the same wild cops who will wrestle people to the ground just to take their ID and freedom away.

[@ryanbarthel5352]

@@vovin8132 They don't HAVE to, but that is the current culture of police in our society. It's super unfortunate.

[@vovin8132]

@@ryanbarthel5352 Well yeah, but realistically you can't stand up to your Karen/Ken coworkers or they will make life difficult for you. I've gone through it myself on a few occasions. I would say that one of the biggest problems in Western society is a generation of has-beens still lingering in lower management/senior positions, unwilling to adapt to current social attitudes or standards.

[@Pygmyz06]

God forbid someone is interested in the legal process and wants to observe.

[@TruckTaxiMoveIt]

Sadly true

[@dontclick7389]

@Phil Allison I have no problem watching two chess masters play and it's sometimes intriguing to me. And court proceedings are so slow you could probably watch a movie and finish before it ends, so finding out what's being said shouldn't be hard if you study the legal procedure for your jurisdiction.

[@Surely_Robert]

@Phil Allison Watching is a great way to learn law. Quite literally in every single court case evidence is presented, amendments and circumstance are brought up, and the case is EXPLAINED in court. What the hell do you think a jury is you moron? With your understanding of how court works, each and every case should be determined by a judge... oh wait the judge wasn't there at the situation either so they don't know what's going on. If you go to watch a case, listen to the facts presented by all sides, and understand the outcome of the case based off what was provided in the court of law, then you learned why that outcome occurred, and WOW you learned something!! You are a fool.

[@DD-kx8ed]

Students are assigned to watch court in many instances. The public servant is too annoying to even comment on.

[@turtleinashirt]

@@Surely_Robert I’ve had that same comment with so many in this Chauvin case. I’m interested in the case. I have no dog in the fight regarding the outcome, but have had people yelling at me and calling me every name in the book for saying I think Chauvin, like all US citizens, deserves a fair trial. It’s getting quite ridiculous really.

[@DOLfirst]

"You're in MY building" ...that security guard (deputy) needs to be educated. I agree he gets a BIG FAT F...hostile, condescending, created the problem. All of your grades are on point.

[@atheistconservative6211]

I lived there for two years, that guy is always in a bad mood.

[@Mads-hl8xj]

@@atheistconservative6211 Make a complain about him if he causes trouble.. i would.

[@katieberwick5169]

I used to work at this courthouse & this is hilarious!! They implemented the added security INSPITE of there being very minimal security issues that weren’t personnel induced, at least during the 6+ years I worked here until 2018. The added security was going in as I decided to part ways.

[@rixbase]

Seems that if the cop created this whole situation. He first falsely claims there is no court, prompting Mr Collier to check for himself. He then claims that the fact Mr Collier continues to check the building is suspicious. If Crone had have given the correct information from the start the following action Mr Collier took would never have taken place.

[@genneanshepherd8984]

AMEN

[@KealanRobert]

True

[@anonymousrex5207]

Based on the interaction it sounds like the deputy thought the guy was looking for a criminal court, so he would have been accurate in telling him that there were no cases going. It is also possible the guy was asking about criminal cases going and not civil, so the deputy did not necessarily lie to him (we don't have footage of the original encounter to verify what was said). However, most of the time when you ask if there is a criminal trial or case going and they say no, they frequently will re-direct you to a civil case going on as another way to view a trial. I would have been interested to see what the original interaction involved here because it sounds like the deputy was just being a dick instead of being much more friendly and helpful like he should have been.

[@hoosierhyperwatch5884]

@@anonymousrex5207, oh I guarantee he was just being a prick. Most pigs are pricks. It's that, "authority" bullshit going to their heads.

[@anonymousrex5207]

@@hoosierhyperwatch5884 really? You know a lot of police officers? The vast majority are nice people trying to do a job that is a lot more difficult and challenging than most people realize. Like any profession there are people doing the job that are lazy, that are assholes and that abuse their position. Due to the nature of the job it is important to identify and remove these people as much as possible, but the problem is the departments are often understaffed and unwilling to remove problem people because they don't want to lose the bodies they need. This is where the real reforms need to happen to provide better reporting and accountability for officers.

[@davidcooper4860]

Deputy Crone appears to be just someone on a power trip. Calling for backup, and wasting police time. Hope he was fired.

[@ryanbarthel5352]

Same, he definitely wasn't tho. Unfortunately, this type of behavior by police isn't punished, its encouraged in our current system.

[@chrisgordon5719]

He was just following orders to keep his job.

[@jamessands5496]

I see nothing wrong with the actions taken by security, in this day and age anyone out of place or acting unusual should be questioned and more importantly should expect to be questioned. If this man had bad intentions he placed himself in a high profile place that is a high priority target area. He should expect to be questioned. Suppose he took interest in our school system and wanted to observe children in a learning enviroment

[@ryanbarthel5352]

@@jamessands5496 Schools are restricted to outsiders, courts are not. You are trying to compare apples to oranges. You are also saying it is okay for security and police to violate your rights whenever they want for whatever reason. Also, making the excuse "in this day and age" is profoundly ignorant since it is implying that today is somehow more dangerous than a year ago, which statistically is not the case.

[@jamessands5496]

@@ryanbarthel5352 both are property of taxpayers just because the security issues in our school system has evolved to its current state does not make them any different from a courthouse built with taxpayers funding .you are getting your fruit mixed up

[@rickdecastro4584]

Love how one cop is covering up his bodycam. Totally innocuous!

[@blackfalcon1324]

Was it? It couldnt have simply been an accident given it was fairly brief and the only thing that really mattered was the audio, making covering it pretty useless to hide something.

[@wvrjl]

Yes, I was thinking the same thing.

[@TopHatHat]

You could see the poor guy’s patience wearing out. The deputy just kept escalating the situation and provoking him.

[@scottholcomb1190]

This alone is probably the biggest issue we have right now with policing in the U.S. These police officers escalate confrontations that would normally be simple and easy. This officer could have simply asked why he was here and let that be the end of it. But he was using his own personal bias and ignorance to escalate, basically accusing this man of doing something wrong with no evidence. We have seen this time and time again with bad police interactions. They get all hyped up on adrenaline and emotions and can't back down when they might be wrong or overstepping. aThey amp it all up to make the situation fit their own internal narrative. It has to stop.

[@antoniusbritannia8217]

@@scottholcomb1190 Hear, hear!

[@chrisgordon5719]

Years of practice and training.

[@rrussell9731]

@@scottholcomb1190 The cops have learned that by escalating they are able to create a situation more favorable to themselves and justify their actions.

[@scottholcomb1190]

@@rrussell9731 It's what they are trained to do and until we demand they are trained better and differently this will never change.

[@recce8619]

"What are you doing here" "Looking for a trial to watch" He then looks for a trial, finds one and starts watching. So having stated his intention, and carried out that intention, he's "suspicious" because his intention is "not normal"???? How many times do we see law enforcement challenge people to justify exercising their rights? You don't have to justify exercising your rights.

[@ladybugsym1614]

Maybe he should just exercise. He a big boy

[@hiwayhighway9925]

And he owed none of that as a free citizen. Nice summary btw

[@theresahall5141]

Considering that used to be no big deal before we have half the rights we have today.

[@elvickRULES]

And he could’ve directly went to where the court preceding was if this moron just told him instead of lying

[@DaveHefty]

I’m not justifying the court officer by any means, but did the victim state he wanted to “watch” a trial or only ask if any were in session? As far as raising suspicion goes, there is a pretty big difference. The officers definitely handled this wrong, but the guy was intentionally being vague in order to bait the outcome. I know these type of auditors are ultimately good for all of us, but it doesn’t make their behavior any less frustrating to watch. He could’ve ended it anytime if he said “I was just trying to learn more about the law and how our court systems work” and “I was ONLY walking around to see if any trials were in session because you didn’t seem truthful. I honestly thought quietly looking was better than questioning your integrity and causing a scene at the entrance.”

[@gyromurphy]

Anyone who's ever been to court in these small towns realizes they quite literally do whatever they want.

[@dkerwood1]

Yep. The town where I grew up has traffic court in a Morton building (the City Hall side - the other half is the Fire Department). I sat in traffic court supporting a friend once and the judge arbitrarily decided to throw out half of the diversion fee for everybody present (that or he just forgot to assign it). The city attorney was not very pleased about that and threw a fit, but complied. Really, though, this "court" was only for traffic within the town as we were not the county seat.

[@berrybestfarmer9614]

Truer words are rarely spoken.

[@Fister_of_Muppets]

Court officer: "I got a big boy down here." Police arrive: Body cam reveals that the court officer must have ate 3 dozen doughnuts for breakfast, dude probably hasn't seen his own nightstick in 20 years.

[@jrwitherite12]

The other guys stomach drapes downs over it, probably pisses on his stomach fat. Both were big old fat guys

[@SliceIceNDice]

rofl

[@ItsRossinator]

That was actually a racist statement. "Boy" from someone like him almost always indicates black man.

[@22yearoldteenager]

@@ItsRossinator he even said he needs backup to feel confident confronting him because he is scared of the “big black man” he is very racist and shouldn’t be in law

[@shawnm7246]

It sounded racial to me. Calling a grown man as a "boy" is racist as hell

[@ASDDOCS]

This is absolutely insane!!

[@AntiCoruptionCentral]

@ASD - DOCS You get an A for single-word description of the "justice" system.

[@Exchange_IDs]

Royce is quick to kick people out so he can watch his movies.

[@cmasterson]

Travis Heinze I have to go back and subscribe to you. I got unsub for some reason. You and @ASD-DOCS vids are great 👍

[@cmasterson]

Travis Heinze “I’ll show you my I’d if you show me yours.” Lol. Every video it gets me lol. The last one I watched you was at a library outside I think. Big fan!

[@westborough6505]

If the officer didn’t lie and told him about the court case. He most likely would of went straight to the court room.

[@jonlamoreaux1889]

@Phil Allison annoy who? Noone in the courtroom asked him to leave

[@jonlamoreaux1889]

@Phil Allison he was litterally pulled out of the courtroom by the rent a bacon

[@andreajames3096]

Exactly he's a liar the tyrant THE PIG HE ATE WANTS OUT.

[@wendellmadfinger2358]

Because the only way that tyranny works is when people remain ignorant

[@turdfurg47]

You are supposed to be allowed to. Used to be common practice

[@jonjensen4514]

The cop is trying to be a bully when he’s just a shriveled prune.

[@kayejaye261]

Just another pos making cops look bad. Had to call and get a couple guys there so he could act tough and bully someone.

[@jeremyashford2145]

Security was concerned because there was someone even fatter than himself in the building.

[@1098234567]

Shriveled? Dude was anything but shriveled, over stuffed pig more like it.

[@chrisgordon5719]

Probably suffers from Pryonnies Disease.

[@chrisgordon5719]

Same as with the Judge,

[@crinklecut3790]

I used to go to the courthouse in the city where I lived and just watch trials all day. I was young and had plenty of free time and it was fascinating to watch the cases. Plus sometimes I would see people I knew who had gotten in trouble. It’s open to the public. This man should not have been removed from a public process.

[@wvrjl]

DEFINITELY NOT!!!

[@glee21012]

He went room to room to see if there was a hearing or trial in process. When he found one, he sat in the public gallery.

[@everyhandletaken]

Exactly, how is that suspicious.. the fact he is quietly seated, after finding the place he wanted to be (and asking if any court was in session).. it doesn’t even warrant a second thought, let alone harassing him over being there.

[@glee21012]

@@everyhandletaken He could have explained it better, but still, his rights were violated. He needs to go back and see if deputy fatso harasses him.

[@sovereignrights]

Gee....are civil court cases held in public tax funded court houses now "Private?"

[@Exchange_IDs]

If only he had seen the active room first, he would have needed to wander.

[@TheWestlandgirl]

@@Exchange_IDs Wouldnt

[@glee21012]

The deputy sounds like he is a drunk, closet alcoholic.

[@cyclepath55555]

Just going to point that out, the guy is drunk with an attitude....

[@FurioGiunta-ji4xk]

Statistics show that is highly likely.

[@glee21012]

@@FurioGiunta-ji4xk If you listen closely he slurs some words, the 911 call as an example

[@MustyRusty5]

You can tell the boi drinks with his bloated beer belly

[@kevio6868]

Although he is a jerk and needs to retire, that is an unfair supposition

[@JRMAV1]

“I got a big boy here.” Have you looked in the mirror rent-a-bacon? Good for the CO though, doing his job after the fact on reprimanding him.

[@akiliachebe]

"Big boy" is not only referencing his size. It's codespeak as well.

[@jonlamoreaux1889]

@@akiliachebe it's how bigot inbred cops refer to black people trying to exist.

[@rasmusgustavsson3426]

@@jonlamoreaux1889 racist

[@jonlamoreaux1889]

@@rasmusgustavsson3426 lmao bootlicker

[@rasmusgustavsson3426]

@@jonlamoreaux1889 you are the one being racist.

[@konfederate6277144]

"When I am being civil and watching a court proceeding Your Security Concerns Go Right Out The Window" I love this guy....

[@8MCDonalds8]

"You're just walking around, like you have some right to see what the building you pay out the ass for looks like...."

[@felathar1985]

"we can't have that here boy! You will obey my athoritah!"

[@pengwin_]

"pay out the ass" you mean 0.002 cents?

[@hiwayhighway9925]

@@pengwin_ maybe for you. I pay way more in taxes.

[@EricRedbear]

"It's my building!" - old deputy "It's my island!" - Stephen of Ireland "It's my life!" - Jon Bon Jovi

[@pjdiver3]

*Fat deputy

[@VidresDJ]

“It’s a me Mario” - Mario

[@augustgreig9420]

"It's my money and I need it now!" - Every US citizen waiting on Congress to get back from vacation and pass the nest stimulus bill.

[@jokeduder]

And it’s now or never!

[@jokeduder]

I don’t wanna live FOREVER!

[@dcsvfa-34pounded53]

The way this guy was able to argue back with such passion and precision while also remaining calm... he should be a lawyer

[@blackfalcon1324]

99.9% of what lawyers do is reading, research and writing. Being good at arguing is one of the worst reasons people give for wanting to be lawyers.

[@Cowabungas]

Oh god it's hilarious how scared he was of this man but as soon as he got a couple cronies behind him he acts like the biggest baddest thing in town

[@wvrjl]

Typical gang behavior.

[@vespeneprotoss4346]

The cop with the pot-belly looked hostile from the start. You have to be careful with cops like that as they'll try to nit-pick and goad you into giving any excuse for them to arrest you.

[@thenightingale7405]

I think you have a bias against pot-bellies. This is how all cops behave not just pot-belly cops. Everything any cop says or does is aimed at generating enough probable cause to justify escalating to detainment and arrest.

[@AntiCoruptionCentral]

@@thenightingale7405 You get an A for on-point analysis.

[@chrisgordon5719]

Or try out their new Glock on you.

[@Exchange_IDs]

Hes also a jail guard. They are terrible people.

[@TheMaijicalKingdom]

“I’m not going to quote amendments! I’m too busy showing how an extremely out of shape officer needs help to impede your rights! Oh, wait! I think I’m having a heart attack!”

[@michaeltruthson6262]

Haaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaa 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂RIP to me because I wasn't ready for this one as I was scrolling 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰💀😂😂😂😂

[@liltasty2572]

This shit left me out of breath just like him when he walks 5 steps lmao😂😂

[@awalk5177]

This deputy is out of line and overstepping his authority. He has no right to prevent a person from an open court unless there is some disruptive behaviour. His reason for being in court was for his own education. It is NOT the deputies building and his ego was way over the top. He should be retired without delay as he his out of control with his "responsibility" and importance. The police were limp biscuits who clearly did not know the laws on watching court proceedings that are open. It should not have gone this far. Again the police looked stupid and driven by ego.

[@Thorndog]

Now given the old coot should have observed the Auditor in the courtroom to see if he was going to be a problem, now he does have the authority in that building because he is assigned to the building to keep it reasonably safe for the judges and public, seems like you are doing exactly what you are accusing the deputy of and letting your ego or dislike of LEO's clog your thinking process a little 😉.

[@3n7r0py]

The one response that I wish Mr Collier had provided when confronted about the suspicious behavior about wandering aimlessly from room to room is: "I would not have needed to wander from room to room if you had told me where active trials were that I might observe. Instead you told me that there were no courts in session today, which has turned out to be a false statement. Thus the only reason I wandered aimlessly is because you were not truthful, which I have since found out. I chose not to hold that against you, or confront you about the matter because I am simply here to observe trials in open court, and learn about the process these things go through. Suspicious is why you would lie to a citizen about court being in session."

[@A1doz]

Guy has my respect for wanting to learn more by attending court hearings, he stood his ground as well great man. Terrible deputy he was dealing with...

[@adama1294]

When I was summoned for jury duty but not picked, the Judge invited all the ones not picked to stay and experience the trial.

[@Lucy-dk5cz]

Judge sounds suspicious

[@bigkoat245]

I was summoned too in Texas and there was people watching the trial, it involved a minor too, although I don't know if the minor was there and I didn't stay. I was so relieved to not be picked after being in the building for like 8 hours.

[@heidikickhouse-]

@pacifca nonook Thank you SO much! I really needed that laugh today. Took a screenshot of your comment and am sending it around, it's priceless, you're going viral!

[@covercalls88]

That was unusual, you must have been at a smaller court. I've done 10 tours of jury duty and if we were not picked we were required to go back to the Jury assembly room.

[@dbadaddy7386]

"Is this a public trial o0r not?" "Well, yeah..." Then immediately turn to reenter the courtroom without any other word and let them be prepared to justify to a jury why they stopped him.

[@blackfalcon1324]

This wouldnt be decided by a jury. It would be decided by a judge.

[@prsjackal]

The initial interactions with the security officer show that he had already determined, without cause or reason, that the man should leave the public building. The officer purposely provided false/misleading information in order to manipulate the gentleman into leaving. There is no reason why the security officer would lie and in fact, his error of commission, not omission, should have resulted in some sort of administrative or disciplinary action. A police officer or other public servant that is shown to purposely lie to the public should be discharged from their duties in the interests of public trust. At no time had the man lied or misled the officer in his intentions but it is clear the officer lacks some degree of ethical or moral behaviour. This entire encounter would have been negated had the officer been truthful and honest…. Period.

[@razzberry4756]

“most people don’t do that.” “I’m not most people.” Considering he did literally nothing the encounter should’ve ended right there. It shouldn’t have happened in the first place in my opinion.

[@Truthzt]

yes

[@ambersykora352]

Nevermind the fact there is a metal detector when you walk in like what the fuck???? How much of a pussy can cops be jeez o pete

[@realSimoneCherie]

Officer: "You just walk around sitting in courtrooms, not knowing anything that's going on?" Actually, I encourage EVERYONE to do just this! It will either blow your mind, break your heart, or both...

[@Syncopia]

Crone over here doesn't like that and apparently the hall monitor is boss.

[@soulscanner66]

I think it's unethical to use other people's misfortune for your own personal entertainment. Trials are humiliating enough without the gawkers.

[@soulscanner66]

@@Syncopia It's his job to stop the drug dealers and gangsters from walking into the court and shooting witnesses. That makes people irritating when they have to deal with assholes.

[@Dowlphin]

@culturefreedom89 TV might show that, too. Although admittedly maybe not in the standard courtroom drama or cop show format. The style of the Phoenix Wright games is probably missing from TV. I think it is more reserved for a few select movies. In any case, when nothing good is on TV, attending a court proceeding might be a good pastime. Especially to avoid the media filter. And that's probably why it is considered suspicious. The system is defending itself. You are supposed to get all your courtroom knowledge from behind the media filter.

[@ivermectin1908]

@@soulscanner66 and I think it is unethical for citizens to NOT observe how justice is being served in their name. I think it is unethical to assume that proceedings held under your authority are being done properly while honoring everyone's rights.

[@DavidBaronStevensPersonal]

If I was law enforcement, I'd watch channels like this daily to improve my craft. What an education

[@buildanddrive]

This dude doesn't need to walk around to court proceedings any longer... He can just watch this channel 🙌🏼

[@22yearoldteenager]

i watch daily rn i’m addicted to seeing the cops in the wrong, i’ve actually stopped eating food because i get enough energy from these videos alone

[@bobbipson8906]

@@22yearoldteenager The best part of these videos is that they bring you up to the brink, and then...(crickets chirping).

[@alexandermacgowan9951]

Unfortunately none of the "law enforcement" in this town know how to read or write and can't count past 10 unless they remove their boots first...and apparently they're still fighting for the South because they are unaware that BLACK PEOPLE have Constitutional Rights too and have been freed from slavery!

[@wvrjl]

They definitely should. These days, many civilians know the law a lot better than cops do. I'm Canadian, and I know American law and American civilian rights better than most of the cop I see on here do. Because I actually bother looking up the laws. Maybe police should try doing that before they try to enforce them.

[@carlostommybaggs5763]

Police: "You can't be here." Member of the Public: "I cannot sit here in the public gallery?" Police: "No. It's very suspicious behaviour for a member of the public to sit in the public gallery, especially quietly."

[@wvrjl]

I know - INSANE. And to have a second officer backing that is ridiculous, and then to deny him his Constitutional rights!!! SMH. So clearly nobody ever suggested that police need to actually learn the Constitution and the laws that they're supposed to uphold???

[@jontolar6838]

The irony of there being a sign that states to be quiet, when the security guard wannabe cop/coward is the one that escalated this whole scenario...

[@Exchange_IDs]

The suspect may have looked like an inmate that Royce guarded.

[@TruckTaxiMoveIt]

The security guard is a cop

[@SiCrewe]

"I'm here to view court proceedings for educational purposes" "When you're just walking around for no apparent reason it's suspicious". I get the feeling that if a lot of cops spent more time LISTENING and less time dreaming up hypothetical reasons to be suspicious, things would go a lot smoother.

[@anonymousrex5207]

Police are trained to look for suspicious behavior and identify potential threats, but this was just going too far. The guy wasn't barging into courtrooms and disrupting proceedings and the deputy could have just as easily observed the guy for a few minutes and verified he was just there to watch a trial before moving on. Confronting the guy over this situation and then removing him from the building is ridiculous... at the very least he could have let the guy go back in the courtroom and watch the trial.

[@SiCrewe]

@@anonymousrex5207 Exactly. I mean, we can all look at anybody on the street and think "Well, he MIGHT be a terrorist" but you can't use that as a basis for deciding how to interact with somebody... especially if they offer some other plausible explanation for their actions. Cops need to start giving some weight to what people say rather than ignoring it and working on the basis of their own prejudices. Sure, a terrorist probably IS going to lie about their intentions, which is why cops get paid the big bucks for figuring out the truth by considering whether a person is known to the police, whether they have weapons on them, whether they're acting in a suspicious manner or whether they're carrying stuff they could use in a violent or antisocial purposes.

[@Exchange_IDs]

Royce watches a lot of movies on the job.

[@ryanbarthel5352]

Unfortunately, police training teaches them to be afraid of the public and not how to look at things objectively and deescalate situations.

[@anonymousrex5207]

@@ryanbarthel5352 Not quite... the officers definitely need better training on de-escalation and professionalism, but most officers are trained to view things in an objective way during a contact. They are also trained in being hyper-vigilant (not to be afraid) because things can get violent really fast in any situation. Just because you pull over a family of four for a speeding ticket or a broken tail light doesn't mean someone won't shoot you in that vehicle. Police officers are killed every year over a random traffic stop or a routine disturbance call, so unfortunately officers letting down their guard could mean the difference between life and death. That's not the officers' fault, but they definitely should try to remain professional, courteous and do everything they can to keep things calm throughout an encounter whenever possilbe.

[@merciless972]

In my middle school we used to take field trips to our downtown courthouses to sit in hearings.

[@itsonlyafleshwound9024]

We did it once in highschool. We came, sat down, waited ... and were told the defendant wasnt coming. I think we were told later that due to a clerical error the defendant was given the wrong court date or something.

[@Nasoj0Tnek]

that explains why I saw a bunch of kids running around court house when I had jury duty, school trip. ha..

[@tonyking9235]

HE GOT ALL BRAVE WHEN HIS GANG TURNED UP 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@tatianat9728]

Crone is a perfect name for such a miserable old man.

[@wheatdevon]

“ *Those who are capable of tyranny are capable of perjury to sustain it* .” “... *only those who have the will and the power to shoot down their fellow men, are the real rulers in this, as in all other (so-called) civilized countries; for by no others will civilized men be robbed, or enslaved* .” ― Lysander Spooner, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority *"So these villains, who call themselves governments, well understand that their power rests primarily upon stolen money* . *With money they can hire soldiers, and with soldiers extort money* . *And, when their authority is denied, the first use they always make of money, is to hire soldiers to kill or subdue all who refuse them more money* ." *-The payment of taxes, being compulsory, of course furnishes no evidence that any one voluntarily supports the Constitution* . *It is true that the theory of our Constitution is, that all taxes are paid voluntarily; that our government is a mutual insurance company, voluntarily entered into by the people with each other; that each man makes a free and purely voluntary contract with all others who are parties to the Constitution, to pay so much money for so much protection, the same as he does with any other insurance company; and that he is just as free not to be protected, and not to pay any tax, as he is to pay a tax, and be protected* . *But this theory of our government is wholly different from the practical fact* . *The fact is that the government, like a highwayman, says to a man: Your money, or your life* . *And many, if not most, taxes are paid under the compulsion of that threat* ;. *The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon him from the road side, and, holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets* . *But the robbery is none the less a robbery on that account; and it is far more dastardly and shameful* . *The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger, and crime of his own act* . *He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to use it for your own benefit* . *He does not pretend to be anything but a robber* . *He has not acquired impudence enough to profess to be merely a “protector,” and that he takes men’s money against their will, merely to enable him to “protect” those infatuated travellers, who feel perfectly able to protect themselves, or do not appreciate his peculiar system of protection* . *He is too sensible a man to make such professions as these* . *Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do* . *He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful “sovereign,” on account of the “protection” he affords you* . *He does not keep “protecting” you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands* . *He is too much of a gentleman to be guilty of such impostures, and insults, and villanies as these* . *In short, he does not, in addition to robbing you, attempt to make you either his dupe or his slave* . *The proceedings of those robbers and murderers, who call themselves “the government,” are directly the opposite of these of the single highwayman* . *In the first place, they do not, like him, make themselves individually known; or, consequently, take upon themselves personally the responsibility of their acts* . *On the contrary, they secretly (by secret ballot) designate some one of their number to commit the robbery in their behalf, while they keep themselves practically concealed* . *They say to the person thus designated:* *Go to A- B-, and say to him that “the government” has need of money to meet the expenses of protecting him and his property* . *If he presumes to say that he has never contracted with us to protect him, and that he wants none of our protection, say to him that that is our business, and not his; that we choose to protect him, whether he desires us to do so or not; and that we demand pay, too, for protecting him* . *If he dares to inquire who the individuals are, who have thus taken upon themselves the title of “the government,” and who assume to protect him, and demand payment of him, without his having ever made any contract with them, say to him that that, too, is our business, and not his; that we do not choose to make ourselves individually known to him; that we have secretly (by secret ballot) appointed you our agent to give him notice of our demands, and, if he complies with them, to give him, in our name, a receipt that will protect him against any similar demand for the present year* . *If he refuses to comply, seize and sell enough of his property to pay not only our demands, but all your own expenses and trouble beside* . *If he resists the seizure of his property, call upon the bystanders to help you (doubtless some of them will prove to be members of our band)* . *If, in defending his property, he should kill any of our band who are assisting you, capture him at all hazards; charge him (in one of our courts) with murder, convict him, and hang him* . *If he should call upon his neighbors, or any others who, like him, may be disposed to resist our demands, and they should come in large numbers to his assistance, cry out that they are all rebels and traitors; that “our country” is in danger; call upon the commander of our hired murderers; tell him to quell the rebellion and “save the country,” cost what it may* . *Tell him to kill all who resist, though they should be hundreds of thousands; and thus strike terror into all others similarly disposed* . *See that the work of murder is thoroughly done, that we may have no further trouble of this kind hereafter* . *When these traitors shall have thus been taught our strength and our determination, they will be good loyal citizens for many years, and pay their taxes without a why or a wherefore* . *It is under such compulsion as this that taxes, so called, are paid* . *And how much proof the payment of taxes affords, that the people consent to support “the government,” it needs no further argument to show* . *Lysander Spooner (1870)*

[@Exchange_IDs]

Nobody gives Crone any respect

[@motivatorsoftheheart0007]

Too many of them in the States.

[@rusosure7]

Crohn's disease is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It causes inflammation of your digestive tract, which can lead to abdominal pain, severe diarrhea, fatigue, weight loss and malnutrition. Inflammation caused by Crohn's disease can involve different areas of the digestive tract in different people.

[@rusosure7]

@@Herbaceously Прости

[@WastingSanityGR]

The officers standing by while Crone acted out gave them an F as well.

[@BuffiestFluff]

I haven't finished it yet, but the officers were there for the security officer to feel comfortable mainly, not to get involved. It's shitty of them not to side with the right man, but not technically required

[@XJWill1]

@@BuffiestFluff No, they failed in their duty to uphold the law. The man was unlawfully ejected from the building and they not only did nothing, they assisted. They should have an F.

[@raymondrak961]

Giving the deputies a C+ is overlooking the fact that they did not descalate and stood by while the security guy was allowed to make his case for suspicious behavior.

[@daveduncan2748]

C+ for the lying officers is way too generous. They illegally forced him to ID, and ejected him from the building. These guys are a criminal gang in a fancy uniform. I give them an F.

[@ptxen7921]

This old cop is a disgrace to the badge. “Cops” like him ruin it for everyone else.

[@crunch9876]

Pt Xen this is an average cop

[@ryanbarthel5352]

It also doesn't help that police culture makes it so that the backup officers wont stand up to other cops because it will ruin their standing within their department.

[@crunch9876]

Ryan Barthel not just ruin their standing but often get them fired

[@ryanbarthel5352]

@@crunch9876 Eh, they don't usually fire because it opens them to lawsuits. They tend to do stuff like not show up when that officer calls for backup or leave dead rats on their cruisers (this shit actually happens and gets covered by the news from time to time). Also, if they fire them, they just get hired at the next department over next week.

[@RearAdmiralTootToot]

@@ryanbarthel5352 yep. Everyone is so afraid of not getting along that the law is sacrificed. The old deputy called for backup when really he needed a backstab.

[@weissrw1]

When I was in college (in the 70s) I wondered whether I would like to be a lawyer -- so when I had free time I went to a local courthouse and watched trials. I liked it, so I became a lawyer.

[@gmk2400]

He pulled him out of the courtroom and told him to be a good boy wtf lol

[@fraydizs7302]

I was a legal student (Drop out after 2 years) and as part of a project we had to go into court cases in our own time and give a presentation about them later. So random people going to see court hearings isn't "strange" behavior.

[@Maxim.Teleguz]

I would like someone to represent him so our rights don’t get trampled on.

[@breeze979truckin3]

They wouldn't make enough money on it sad they put profit before doing the right thing

[@JimMutter]

@@breeze979truckin3 just like the rest of us, they have families to feed.

[@breeze979truckin3]

@@JimMutter I agree but I feel most lawyers are a part of the problem especially ambulance chasers. If this had happened to a lawyer or a friend or relatives it would have been worth it but for this guy not so much. I own a business and its about morals I think because I find myself doing things for customers that are not worth my time just to help them out. I don't know maybe I'm just living my life all wrong

[@GSP-76]

@@breeze979truckin3 most lawyers have no morals. They're only out to make money, not protect rights...sad but true.

[@kunushiknows6874]

If he was black, lawyers would have been lining up.

[@LeahBrooksJeremiahGardens]

He's concerned because the man 'might start something' when the man is sitting quietly, watching a trial. The security officer's behavior is disgusting.

[@drunkdogartwork4016]

The deputy flat out lied when asked about any scheduled hearings. He didnt know the reason for the question and thus decided to lie. He had no idea if the individual asking was a part of the proceedings. It is a fundamental part of his job to be honest and truthful.

[@revivedprism3828]

@@katyar4883 he isnt a cop thats the deputy

[@20tigerpaw20]

@@katyar4883 not really, as like mentioned above: "he had no idea if the person was asking was apart of the proceedings" and if that were the case, could have caused either of the parties to lose due to a lack of witness. now, had he asked if he was apart of any proceedings that day and the person said "no" then he could have lied and said there wernt any, however, the man was not trespassing and as such, was allowed to be in the building.

[@djtrix8034]

I think it was more of a case of ignorance he just didn’t know court was going on because he was dir Dee dir

[@revivedprism3828]

@@baddriversofthenorcalarea500 Ik but the person was referring to the police officer as a deputy but he wasent

[@revivedprism3828]

@@baddriversofthenorcalarea500 i dont remember exactly what this was about but i think The deputy Is The deputy for the building and he called a officer and they despatched that officer again im not exactly sure anymore what im talking about

[@johnallen78]

maybe a lot of auditors should check out this building.

[@TruckTaxiMoveIt]

Or better yet just ordinary citizens

[@thomascorrea3937]

Funnnnnnnnnny

[@Vexas345]

I have a feeling that deputy wouldn't have an issue with most of the local public in the building, considering their demographics.

[@pugness]

When I was in school, I used to sit in on court rooms all the time as part of my course work.

[@Exchange_IDs]

Sitting in the most corrupt court rooms, like Williston, can be the most educational.

[@nekoprincess4130]

"It's MY building." "No, it's OUR building." *soviet anthem plays*

[@wvrjl]

"Soviet Anthem plays"???? He is right. It is the people's building and it is specifically open to the public to watch. And it is his constitutional right to watch open trials. The only exception is if he creates a disturbance, and he didn't create ANY disturbance. The security guard did! He also lied to him so he had to amble and find the open courtroom himself. I am most definitely not a sovereign citizen, as I can properly read legal documents. That security guard, and the cop who helped him, were EXTREMELY out of line in kicking him out of court, kicking him out of the building, and trespassing him from the building with no reason for doing so. This definitely raises some racism issues, unless he kicks everybody out of the building who wants to watch a trial.

[@genxnomad1978]

Coward: We've got a pretty big BOY hanging around here. I would feel more comfortable confronting him if I had a little backup.😒😔

[@RearAdmiralTootToot]

especially since this deputy's gut looked like he was going to give birth to a big boy

[@blueclaws9894]

Oh I know, I heard that "boy" and knew just from the way he said it, exactly what kind of bigot he is. Did you notice how intensely angry he got when Collier didn't immediately submit? Holy shit, that's one racist 'good-ole-boy' security guard. Why does security and law enforcement seem to attract that kind of person? I assume it's the position of authority, however mild and limited it may be, over others. Just sad. Hope Mr. Collier doesn't give up his interest in law and legal proceedings because of this asshat.

[@danowolf]

It is normal procedure to ask for backup. This was an older officer who is not nearly in good shape.

[@gatherer818]

@@blueclaws9894 Oh yeah, that was code for the n-word, and dispatch knew it.

[@incelmagnet1737]

Blue Claws I have no idea how you came to the conclusion that he’s a racist bigot. Please use these words appropriately

[@Gilhelmi]

I would like to see you review the footage of the Utah Nurse who was arrested for following the hospital policies and refusing to allow a police officer to take a blood sample from a patient (without a court order). It is a few years old now, and the civil case was settled. It would also cover a private security (the University's security force) who ignored policy in favor of a police officer interpretation of the law.

[@uisfull]

When you say security ignored policy what do you mean exactly?

[@Gilhelmi]

@@uisfull essentially, they ignored that the hospital had a specific policy and sided with the police officer. They were there to protect and serve the hospital, employees, and students. Edit: forget to mention, the police department actually helped them write the policy to help ensure it was legal.

[@ryanbarthel5352]

I believe they did a video on her already.

[@Gilhelmi]

@@ryanbarthel5352 Oh, I must have missed it. I will look again. Thank you. Edit: I could not find it, do you know what the title was?

[@johnychrist2559]

@@Gilhelmi I dont think they did that one because of how publicized it was and heavily covered by tons of other people. They dont usually go for well known police interactions

[@wowzanpakutou]

In fairness if the security guy told him at the start when he asked if there was a trial going on he wouldn't have been wandering the halls, he'd have been straight to the courtroom without being "suspicious".

[@dontaylor7315]

"Wandering the halls" seems legit to me. A citizen checking out his public institutions doesn't sound like a threat, just civic engagement.

[@rodh1404]

He might have still been hauled out of the courtroom on "suspicion". Why is he attending a court session he has nothing to do with? Why did he go to a courthouse when he's not involved in any of the proceedings? There are lots of ways to make perfectly legal activities seem "suspicious". In fairness, the deputy's suspicion in this case isn't unjustified. He's paid to provide security to the building and someone is there for reasons he doesn't fully understand. Any prudent guard would want to keep an eye on him. That's a very reasonable response to that reasonable suspicion. The problem here is that the deputy chose to respond in a very unreasonable way. By denying a citizen's ability to peacefully view a court case, the deputy is implying the court had something to hide. As AtA explains, sometimes that's done to protect the participants, but generally speaking, "Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done". Members of the general public who have no connection to the case being tried are as close to an impartial witness as you can get, and normally the court should want citizens with an interest in justice to observe their proceedings simply to verify that they are doing their job properly. Otherwise, why have public trials in the first place?

[@monkberrymoon3999]

@@rodh1404 Gotta disagree with the first part of your analysis. I dont think anyone should ever be compelled to explain their reasons for attending a public trial. That's the whole point to a public trial. So to say that's "suspicious" behavior kinda misses the point of the whole justice system. On the other hand, I would have given the citizen less than an A in this case.....wandering the hallways of a public building seems unnecessarily provocative.

[@Exchange_IDs]

The Xray security are too busy watching movies to care what the hearing schedule is.

[@CatsClaw44]

No, because you have a right to be in the courthouse.

[@stevechristophersen5105]

The "court goon" reminds me of Paul Sr. from Orange County Choppers.

[@SlyMT]

It was obvious why he was "suspicious" after the 911 caller said "big boy" 🙃

[@Exchange_IDs]

Royce let the big boy pass through the xray machine.

[@liltasty2572]

He probably stole his cheeseburgers.

[@coolcpa3321]

"boy" is Williston, N.D. speak for "darker than beige"

[@papwithanhatchet902]

“Unusual”, “not normal”, “suspicious”, holy moses what invectives describing a legal right. Terrible policing.

[@theresahall5141]

Not normal really just means not common. But there no law that says you have fit into a mold.

[@timtompkins8774]

I also think it should be an offense for a cop to cover his body cam like they do a lot of the time trying to hide something that's happening

[@brainwashed2586]

The old you're acting suspicious line

[@archivemedia1140]

That fact that Offer Crone describe him as “a big boy” confirms how ignorant and disrespectful he was during this encounter.

[@robv5834]

No... had he needed to take him down he probably couldn’t do it alone. That’s the only part that made sense but he never should have called in the first place.

[@fuccinshit]

@@robv5834 Him using the word boy is not ok that right there let's you know what he thinks.

[@HunterJs2]

weston travis Calling a dude of Collier’s size a “big boy” is an extremely common phrase. If you’re implying racist intent behind it, I really struggle to see how that could be evidence.

[@jonathanbuzzard6648]

@@HunterJs2 calling a black adult male a boy is inherently racist. Bob Dylan understood that in 1962 when he wrote the opening lines to "Blowing in the Wind". If you don't understand that you are either stupid or a racist.

[@fuccinshit]

@@jonathanbuzzard6648 Or could be both. Great answer

[@On2wls]

The other thing that bothers me is NOT being able to find a lawyer that wants to take on the cops. Just the right hand shaking the left hand.

[@Wastok]

@busy catter so like bankruptcy attornies or landlord-tenant dispute attornies who are helping people in dire financial straits can't really make all that much money or attornies who help poor families during divorce. I wonder why they do it. Why do attornies do things like work a civil rights case pro-bono; in case you didn't know that means "free." Sounds like you want to make generalizations based on maybe some unpleasant experience you had combined with not understanding how lawyers in different fields actually earn money.

[@wesleymoreira5349]

He need to get arrested to have a case worth of $$$ otherwise lawers wont take the case.

[@BigSkyCurmudgeon]

don't you mean "not being a lawyer willing to work cheap"?

[@Syncopia]

"I don't like your presence"

[@realSimoneCherie]

Right - so the man was asked to identify because the officer sensed that he would refuse to show it, and since that is required, the officer would then have a lawful reason to detain and remove the man. He failed, and losers hate failing.

[@mikaelgaiason688]

@@realSimoneCherie Didn't fail. He got his way and nothing changed

[@OrangeRocks1986]

@@mikaelgaiason688 The guy gave it on purpose to a different officer. Thus he was mad and was going to get him removed period. The officer got chewed out as the guy did file complaints.

[@mikaelgaiason688]

@@OrangeRocks1986 Officer didn't get chewed out. Probably got the complaint framed and mounted on the wall in the break room for him and all the other officers to laugh at. Complaints have zero affect when everybody is openly complicit.

[@dontaylor7315]

@@OrangeRocks1986 @Mikael Gaiason you're both right. The security guard who oinked was officially corrected but it's a crapshoot whether anybody really cared.

[@OmerQuenneville]

This guy was a perfect gentleman... gezzz

[@Dirk_the_Daring]

"I am observing to learn courtroom procedures here." is a good excuse to be there.

[@jroc1064]

I work in a law enforcement capacity and watching your videos and how officers talk to people has helped me so much in being cognizant of my demeanor when dealing with the public and focusing on remaining polite and cordial especially when dealing with someone who is irate or upset. Keep up the good work

[@mattbrown5511]

You are part of the problem, no matter how nice you pretend to be.

[@jroc1064]

Matt Brown 👍 you have a great day sir

[@shakesthefinest3331]

ACAB

[@richaldeano]

@@mattbrown5511 What are you talking about?

[@jroc1064]

SHAKES THE FINEST sorry you feel that way...I like to think I’m not a bastard I support the idea of 1st amendment auditors learn a lot from their videos but I respect your right to feel that way. Have a good day sir

[@fixedguitar47]

Here we go AGAIN! In this day and age. In this current climate. It doesn’t work that way. I have every right. I’m the law! I’m giving you a lawful order! Can I pat you down? We got a call. Here’s the deal. Anything illegal on you? Anything in your car I should know about? Anything in your pockets that will poke me? Anything you’d like to tell me? This is a sobriety checkpoint! This is a immigration checkpoint! This is a drivers license checkpoint! This is a seatbelt checkpoint! This is a produce checkpoint! I heard screaming! I heard arguing! I heard noises! I heard voices! I heard whispering! I smell marijuana! I smell alcohol! I smell meth! I smell crack! Why are your eyes glassy? Why are your eyes dialated? Why are your eyes pinpoint? Why are your eyes shaking? Why are your eves watery? Why are your eyes bloodshot? Why are you sweating? Why are you so nervous? Why are you shaking? Why are you so calm? Why are you breathing so heavy? Why are you breathing so shallow? Why are you breathing so fast? Why are you breathing so slow? Do you have a weapon? Do you have a gun? Do you have a knife? Do you have a sharp object? Do you have a I.D.? Do you have a warrant? Do you have a felony? Do you have a license? I’d like to know who I’m dealing with. I’d like to know your name. I’d like to know your intentions. I’d like to know what your doing. I’d like to know what your up to. Do you have any documents? Do you have any fruit? Do you have any vegetables? Do you have any money? Where are you coming from? Where are you going? You match the description! You match the tell tale signs! You match the demographic! Are you on probation? Are you sober? Are you on drugs? Are you on medications? Are you under the influence? How much have you had to drink? What are you hiding? I’m not searching I’m inspecting! You look suspicious! You’re acting suspicious! You sound suspicious! Why won’t you let us search you? Why are you so uncooperative? The K-9 hit on your car! The K-9 hit on your person! The K-9 hit on your passenger! The K-9 hit on your rectum! If you don’t answer my questions you go to jail! If you don’t talk to me you go to jail! If you don’t listen to me you go to jail! STEP OUT OF THE CAR!!! I DON’T HAVE TO GIVE YOU MY NAME!!! I CAN DO WHATEVER I WANT!!! I AM THE LAW!!! I DON’T HAVE TO LISTEN TO YOU!!! DON’T YOU DARE DISRESPECT ME!!! TURN OFF THAT PHONE!!! PUT YOUR HANDS ON THE HOOD!!! PUT YOUR HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK!!! STOP RESISTING!!! STOP GOING FOR MY GUN!!! TAZER TAZER TAZER!!! SHOTS FIRED SHOTS FIRED!!! We KNOW you did it! We HAVE evidence! We HAVE a witness! We KNOW you were there! We HAVE you on camera! We HAVE your fingerprints! We can place you at the scene. We can put you in the timeline. We wanna hear your side! Just confess and you’ll feel better. Just tell us and this can be over with. Just man up and let it out. All attorneys do it slow things down. All attorneys do is take your money. All attorneys do is screw your over. All attorneys do is prolong the inevitable.

[@superque4]

This deserves a shirt!

[@ninasliwinski2326]

Love Love it

[@terrymurphy1219]

Exactly

[@fixedguitar47]

superque4 - A shirt? Want me to put this on a shirt? NO!

[@fixedguitar47]

Terry Murphy - Exactly what?

[@profribasmat217]

I am about to handle a civil litigation for my business. I absolutely plan to watch MANY civil trials as part of my preparation.