When Corrupt Cops Get BUSTED By Informed Citizens! LAWSUIT INCOMING!

[@AuditTheAudit]

Thank you for being here and supporting the channel! I hope you have a great Monday! Any likes or subs are greatly appreciated! Cheers!

[@Stuffthings17]

A notification from you is always a highlight

[@Athleticblacklesbian]

Im sorry, does the statute actually "any drag race or race" because that would mean ANY RACE OR DRAG RACE, such as the Daytona 500, the Gator Nationals.... seems vague and unconstitutional. Court should just strike it down, you cant fuck with people for watching idiots do stupid shit.

[@djksfhakhaks]

I highly regret trying to read that in your voice. There is no instance where you express excitement. Therefore the exclamation marks are undefined.

[@juliebaker6969]

I've got news for the vegan protestors..... cars can't be vegan, because gas isn't vegan. Even electric and biodiesel cars contain animal based products. And even Ethanol fueled cars run on fuel that is at least 17% gasoline. A 100% vegan lifestyle just doesn't exist in the 21st century.

[@DiamondDogSays]

Suggestion: Split these 'double features' into two separate videos uploaded one day apart from each other. The main reason I request that is because I like reading the comments, but most of the time it seems like people just comment on the first interaction and ignore the second.

[@marklindsey579]

So if the police have this all on video, arent they committing the same crime they are giving a ticket for?

[@ekatprankster109]

Its only a problem when we do it

[@DanMcD80]

Rules for thee, but not for me

[@donkeydeck5263]

My sweet summer child, police are above the law.

[@nathanc8478]

They are immune from crimes.

[@ephy1973]

No. They are spectating the spectators. However, they are illegally detaining, extorting, and earning the hate.

[@PepeToTheMooon]

Standing around watching cars is a “moving violation.” Make it make sense.

[@alexatedw]

You can be parked in the middle of a highway and that would be a moving violation

[@nuclearmedicineman6270]

It doesn't make sense, it's a bogus charge. Pure fabrication by the cop. The kind of "racing" specified in the law didn't take place, and he wasn't "spectating" in the manner described in the law.

[@DaveBigDawg]

​@@alexatedw that's a traffic violation and someone in control of a vehicle This person is a pedestrian What if they didn't have a driver's license

[@alexatedw]

@ can you not drive a car or get a ticket if you don’t have a drivers license?

[@Hillbillywelder]

@@alexatedwthat’s like comparing an apple to a rock, they aren’t even close.

[@LivelysReport]

Everyone who watched this video is now guilty of spectating this event as well.. when do I get my ticket to appear?

[@VENENOSEASON]

You won’t actually get a ticket for that.

[@Catolicodeguerra]

@@VENENOSEASONyes you will i got my ticket today from watching this video elon used his indian cheap labor to find my accounts to give me ticket

[@louisscouten7389]

​@@VENENOSEASONno sheet

[@lonelyfiretruck2508]

@@VENENOSEASONyeah its a joke bro

[@SD-kt6cb]

Shit your right I’m getting a lawyer

[@ki5aok]

Just remember: If someone accelerates too fast and cause the wheels to spin, you're breaking the law if you watch it. So, if you're waiting for the traffic light to change, make sure you cover your eyes and don't look at the cars.

[@eponymousIme]

🙂

[@mr.duanesharpe]

Some “Indiana Jones, Temple of Doom” shit right there. “Close your eyes…..” 🤦‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏿‍♂️

[@Vincentflagg]

That law is stupid in the way they are using them, so if you happened to walk by the sidewalk next to a road, and someone pass and chirp his tires and star racing with anotjer car, you are a criminal because you happens to look that way, stupid, and all who enforced that law like that is an idiot who need only to pick shit.

[@rodh1404]

That only applies if you've made an "affirmative choice to attend" the event. But if the event you've come to attend is a car show, and you end up witnessing a "street takeover", the police apparently think you also make an affirmative choice to do that too. And it assumes a "street takeover" occurred in the first place, which doesn't seem to have happened anyway according to the legal definition.

[@ki5aok]

@@mr.duanesharpe 🤣🤣🤣

[@48mastadon]

That female supervisor in the first clip is the worst. Earning the hate one lie and one citizen at a time.

[@dare2554]

she wasn't a supervisor

[@48mastadon]

@@dare2554 I saw this same clip on a different channel and she was described (maybe wrongfully so) as a supervisor.

[@AsdAsd-nl6xg]

she's got bruised knees and lockjaw as she climbs the ranks in the department

[@d3adlyz3bra]

she has a link if you wanna go find it lmfao

[@d3adlyz3bra]

@@AsdAsd-nl6xg nah they just get free access to her content. maybe a feature

[@greglazerwitz3342]

Wait wait wait... the protestors get a C for "maintaining an unnecessarily hostile attitude throughout the interaction, remaining and continuing their protest on private property after being asked to leave, and potentially committing the offense of defiance trespass." So they were wrong, they were wrong, and they were potentially wrong. And that gets a passing grade? No way. That grade gets an F.

[@Bcoupes20]

Yea I’m with ya on this. They were told to get out (lied to the officer and said no one told them to leave), they all were being trespassed so they had to be stopped, and she just thought she was allowed to go after being told why she had to stop, plus she was aggressive off the rip. That’s an F. The worst thing the cop did was says she hit him with the car

[@jaydavis6825]

The female cop in the first clip is absolutely terrible. She also deserves an F.

[@ijustlovetotravelandeat453]

I absolutely 💯 % agree with you. Vegetables dint want to die either somebody should have said. A BIG F for the protestors.

[@beckserker1662]

@@Bcoupes20yea idk why the whole lying to the cops thing wasn’t mentioned in their grade

[@RS-zp1we]

​​@@ijustlovetotravelandeat453 This is not about the ideals of the protectors. Besides, it's very possible to eat parts of plants without the plant dying. Also, plants are not known to have pain receptors, nor being sentient. If you come up with a dumb argument against veganism, make it a good one. Kind regards, an omnivore.

[@WOHM8274]

This one made me mad. Looking is now against the law. Don’t you dare use your eyes to watch cars drive off.

[@zacharysherry2910]

The cops have no brain cells

[@carma459]

Praying silently to yourself. We'll get you thrown in jail as well. Depending on where you are

[@Tankeryanker339]

@@carma459yup the world has gone mad.

[@carma459]

So this is a Crime? A crime that could jail you? And when you go for a job, it may or may not keep you from getting a job to feed your family. Take this cops certificate. If he's this ignorant, he does not need to be caring a gun and with unlimited powers.

[@briarrose29]

It doesn’t sound like it was a new law. I can see Florida’s point in it. It all should be discouraged because many of these end up in death. In this situation, the cop was definately out of pocket though. Cop had no proof it was a street takeover or drag race!

[@carlannanan]

1st case. Nobody can convince me that this guy was NOT targeted.

[@TheOneandOnlyD-R-E]

He was. They hate people with cameras

[@Failiomon]

He was targeted. There were other people there watching and filming too.

[@MrBeevee5]

He was a black man with a camera. Of course he is guilty. Right?

[@Dee-c1e]

Exactly😂😅😂🤣🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

[@Dee-c1e]

​@@MrBeevee5in this communist country this is real.

[@luster5497]

When the cop said, “There’s no ticket quota” Everyone Else; “Are you sure”

[@KMaserati]

Imagine charging someone for looking at somebody else do something illegal

[@Vancev99x]

Whats crazy is they say it's to stop encouraging the street racers but what they fail to understand is the people they want to see this are IN THE TAkEOVER WITH THEM!

[@Nikkithedog-t6b]

Imagine legally being ID whenever they want, it's about to happen since voters decided to vote down the constitution.

[@KMaserati]

@@Nikkithedog-t6b don’t get my PTSD started on Veterans Day 😂😂😂

[@thomas1942]

By that logic, every time i'm watching a cop in public there is a 50/50 chance i'm watching someone do something illegal.

[@alfiewillis4893]

And it doesn't even appear that any of the drivers explicitly broke the law, or if they did then it's not clear because 1) we don't know the speed limit of the area, 2) there didn't appear to be any deliberate attempt to perform a burnout, and 3) there were no races happening at the scene. You can't even firmly establish that the drivers were breaking the law, it rules.

[@RockMountainYJ]

I hate when my eyes commit crimes.

[@luciddream2033]

You don't think there is any case in which you can commit a crime with your eyes?

[@GarlandFarms]

​@luciddream2033 Not while simply standing in a public space. Fewer people like you in this world is what is needed.

[@luciddream2033]

@GarlandFarms if you attend a protest that turns into a riot, that is an unlawful assembly. You can be arrested for failing to disperse. The same logic applies here. When an event turns into an unlawful event, the people who attend that unlawful event can be subject to criminal prosecution. The government has an interest in keeping our streets safe. That means from people who attend street takeovers.

[@SharkRoach1]

What have you done?

[@NoPartySelected]

​​@@luciddream2033you said "same logic applies here". How was this gathering "unlawful"? This was an organized event to see cars. That's exactly what we did...we...saw...cars. That's not illegal in any way. The real crime here was committed by the officers.

[@loveumore_]

Thank god for the people out there exposing the corruption. Hope this inspires people to record EVERYTHING.

[@marklindsey579]

The protestor were completely in the wrong when they "moved" to another spot in the store. I fully respect the right to protest but this was trespassing after being told to leave and not leaving. The chanting they did could have also be considered disorderly conduct as well. If you are going to protest do it on public property not someone else's property. I'd give them an F the same as I would the cop.

[@davealmighty9638]

Its criminal mischief. They entered private business to disrupt thier sales. They should have all been arrested.

[@Cableguy5770]

Since these are both potential misdemeanors committed outside the officer's presence, theres no RAS to detain. Shoulda just let them leave. Problem solved.

[@nickminneti825]

The store missed an opportunity...they should have put all meat and dairy on 25% off and had their own signs asking patrons to thank the protesters for the sale. Then called the cops to remove them on top of it all. Thanks for the cheap and tasty meat, fools, go back to whole foods.

[@davealmighty9638]

@Cableguy5770 that is incorrect. If multiple witnesses accuse you of a crime, police have reasonable suspicion for detainment. They need probable cause to arrest. There is a majo8r difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause.

[@Havoc800]

@@davealmighty9638 The cop committed a crime and you seem ok with that.

[@danielprivate7442]

The law regarding "spectators" in a "street takeover" pertains the people IN THE STREET who are PART of the "takeover"....not just anyone who happens to see it happening.

[@tomduckworth6430]

That’s why the word “knowingly” is in the statute. Good luck trying to prove any of the people recording knew that the cars would be doing anything illegal.

[@kurtwetzel154]

What if these drivers did it on a street with houses and/or businesses and those people watched? Would they get a ticket.

[@genewitch]

@@kurtwetzel154 ring camera owners getting tickets in the mail for spectating exhibitions of speed!

[@codypayne2632]

Absolutley insane. I live in palm beach. Half tempted to show up in December and support this gentleman

[@sinistersmallblock]

You should! We will both be there!

[@randomDisinformation13]

The protestors in this video are the definition of what not to do while protesting.

[@janeysiegrist5061]

These aren't protesters, these are people watching cars pull out of a parking lot.

[@dwaynesmith9482]

@@janeysiegrist5061he’s not talking about the first video, he’s talking about the Vegans in the 2nd clip

[@crimeandcrafting]

Vegans are tyrants. If they could, they would dictate everything you ate, wore or every place you went to. I agree with a lot of their message but none of the delivery

[@cameron4997]

This exactly. They were told to leave, and refused. Them recording themselves saying "They told us to leave", "We have more time" multiple times supports the charge.

[@mike9031]

​@@janeysiegrist5061what's scary, your vote counts the same as others. We need a better system

[@alphonse2234]

End qualified immunity!

[@reed510]

It's about to get much worse

[@Nikkithedog-t6b]

Sorry bro, trump was elected and the cop crimes are going to skyrocket. The criminals are now in power.

[@echo6echo419]

@@reed510 Get your head out of your own delusion. Nothing is getting worse. QI wasn't even an issue here. You do realize that it doesn't get used unless there is a civil suit right?

[@CaptainXJ]

QI is a major problem and it is about to get A LOT worse.

[@sdkkreations3689]

@@echo6echo419get out of your delusion, if QI was abolished they will be more cautious or more diligent to learn the law because they don’t want to pay out of their pockets if they are wrong

[@FirstThenLast13]

That female tyrant is so ashamed of her behavior that she has to lie about it.

[@kylemendoza8860]

Do you blame her? Complete morality aside. I wouldn't want to look like such an idiot.

[@cedriclasry9151]

I can't agree with the "C" grade given to the protestors. They made no effort to leave after being asked to do so, that should be an F.

[@krane15]

At least a D.

[@hatterson]

Additionally they set up their protest without bothering to inform themselves of the difference between public and private property (or lying to the officer about their knowledge of that) and they also directly lied to the officer when they stated "Nobody asked us to leave" So in addition to trespassing they potentially could have faced criminal liability for lying to the officer which would hinder their investigation (of if trespassing took place) and, depending on jurisdiction, potentially even criminal or civil consequences for entering a business with the explicit purpose of disrupting their business. Seems like a very clear F to me.

[@BushidoNinja]

ATA almost never gives anyone other than the officers an F. He is very anti police.

[@hatterson]

@@BushidoNinja I don't think he's anti-police at all. I think he grades officers much more stringently than others since theoretically officers are supposed to be the ones trained for situations like this. They operate with the legal authority of the government and it makes sense to hold them to a higher standard than a random citizen.

[@PneumaNoose]

@@hattersonthank you! I was going to comment something similar but you said it so much better. LEOs are held to a much higher standard than the everyday citizen, therefore they must be held to a harsher grading system.

[@Michael-mw3gz]

Imagine being so petty that you give a ticket for watching cars.

[@lorrainekopp6504]

Human nature is not a crime, unless you copsplain it into one.

[@dogcrazy25]

Shame on you for watching cars at a car show, that you may have to pay to enter. Ridiculous.

[@kingkerry123]

Blonde cops orders. Dopey cop was just doing what she told him to. So, not petty just low IQ

[@jmeponte972]

LOL Right!! Man them streets are definitely so much safer from them "spectators" today!

[@stephengrigg5988]

"Is that your current address?" Beyond petty, was trying to get him for a current address too.

[@arthurneddysmith]

This Australian is constantly stunned that, despite all the constitutional protections Americans have, there are *always* cops *determined* to violate the rights of citizens. It makes me wonder what America would be like without those constitutional protections. We also face many of the same challenges here, but the sheer determination of American police to imprison the American population seems unique and America, the most imprisoned population on the planet, is statistically set apart from other representative democracies. Even autocratic nations can't keep up, statistically, with America's rate of imprisonment, so the question persists: Why?! What is it about American police (and American justice) that makes them so ... tyrannical?

[@evangilchrist981]

And Americans think we are oppressed for having RBTs...

[@annjepsen1621]

There's a long history when it comes to the police. They started as slave catchers and security guards (so to speak), they were formed to protect rich people's property and not the people.

[@SweetBabyJesusOnTheCross]

why? I'm guessing the fact that the prison industry brings in $75 billion annually would have something to do with it. And as to your first question wondering what the US would be like without constitutional rights afforded to it's citizenry, I would suggest that it may not look all that different than it already does. Seeing as how, as you said yourself, "there are always cops determined to violate the rights of citizens", it would likely be only slightly more exaggerated than it is already. The US Constitution would be better served used as toilet paper at times considering how often those that are bound by oath to uphold it consistently wipe their own asses with it right before ignoring it. But I could be wrong. I'm not, but I could be.

[@altiar789]

Maybe you should look at why Australians have so few protections. Y’all fought for independence from a tyrannical govt then just built one 😂

[@jennifersmith2050]

Private prisons. There's your answer.

[@NicoNuney]

Tells him he has the option to go to traffic school. Why in the f*** would I go to traffic school because I pointed a camera at a car from the sidewalk?

[@01kilik10]

No way the "no spectating" law is constitutional.

[@tangoalpha1091]

Right to assembly, as it were? Could be something there.

[@dl200010]

It is probably constitutional, because the "no spectating" law only applies when you knowingly go to an illegal event, not here where he was just on the side of the road as some drove illegally, but came from a legal event.

[@05Maxima-j5q]

​@@dl200010 Whats illegal about a car show?

[@dl200010]

@@05Maxima-j5q I called the car show a legal event. The only thing I called illegal is how these people were driving. Learn to read for comprehension instead of trying to find something to attack.

[@05Maxima-j5q]

@dl200010 What are you on about? Nobody is attacking you, quit trying to act like a victim.

[@jonlawson3004]

It’s so insane that in a situation where there is such a massive disparity in power. Those in power can lie with impunity and those without can be jailed for giving false statements.

[@kuwabaragriffin5429]

Remember folks, it's a crime to be a witness

[@OrbSpider]

Especially when living under communist rule . The inability to recognize a police state somewhat hinders the American people as their beliefs are strong. The actions of the state definitely prove otherwise.

[@grantsamson2384]

This sounds like a law created to try and deal with Fast and the Furious style street races.

[@Libertaro-i2u]

​@grantsamson2384 It's supposedly to stop people from encouraging street racing by cheering it on, but we all should know the real reason for this law.

[@martinswiney2192]

He should have just told the cop he was collecting evidence for them. 😂

[@SecuR0M]

​@@OrbSpider American traffic laws are way worse than any Communist country. Russia literally had no drink driving laws prior to 1998. It was too evil for Communism.

[@gofeukurself6465]

F the cops in the first vid. F the vegans in the second.

[@old72mac]

💯💯💯

[@ChrisM-h5u]

Vegans for Kamala, tasty meat eaters for Trump.

[@gofeukurself6465]

@@ChrisM-h5u that's an odd way to admit you want to blow trump.

[@ChrisM-h5u]

@gofeukurself6465 aww sorry your horse lost. Maybe you should open your eyes soy boy

[@davidcolin6519]

@@gofeukurself6465 There's a lot of man love for Trump, even "down" to his anthem.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣As for his "blowing" a mic, how more explicit does he have to be? All these "Manly", "tasty" "meat eaters" are all so sweet on other "manly" men, if you know what I mean.

[@K0GKU]

The first segment is an excellent example of how police departments show that they do not want car shows in their jurisdiction. They bully and harass those participating and those spectating until organizers get sick of it and take the party elsewhere. It happens all the time, unfortunately.

[@katiekane5247]

Not in Dawson county Georgia

[@LuvMyCardiKids]

A moving violation for standing on the right of way and watching cars being driven on the road? That’s insane. These cops are nuts.

[@repro7780]

I wonder how much the ticket is for?...How ridiculous.....

[@Stansbrokenhandle]

Whoever wrote and voted for the law is insane. The cops are just the typical "Letter, not Spirit" of the law types. I can't believe I just partially defended a cop's actions...

[@kurtwetzel154]

What if said person recording doesn't drive with no drivers license? How could that person get a moving violation? If the person is driving they weren't driving recording the event. Make the statue make sense.

[@rogerrogerorger]

Car guy: Please get a lawyer for the dispute of the ticket

[@NoPartySelected]

Only for the lawsuit portion, not the initial hearing. That's a slam dunk for anyone who knows how to question the opposing side in a debate/ legal argument.

[@AlexShop954]

Thanks!

[@Jolson17929]

What never made sense is shouldn’t the cops be giving themselves tickets? They saw the same thing that the people watching on the corner did. That one is wild.

[@MSFTS_DECAY]

"Rules for thee but not for me" - All Cops Everywhere

[@bryanrmcnair01]

Real SovCits be doing sovcit things!!!

[@krystilize1573]

Watching in of itself is not a crime. It's watching it knowingly that is a crime.

[@James-mx3ry]

I hate seeing these bullies hiding behind their badges and wearing their tactical gear.

[@stevejette2329]

James - Imagine how you would feel in UVALDE, TX when 376 cowards arrived wearing hero uniforms to protect the children ... oops

[@James-mx3ry]

@stevejette2329 I can imagine them all cowered outside of the school, all talking about how cool they look and feel in in their tactical gear.

[@stevejette2329]

@@James-mx3ry With the gear, tools, beards, tattoos they are now Special Forces, SWAT, Green Beret, SEAL

[@BushidoNinja]

You probably like criminals running the streets tho. Funny how ATA never shows positive police encounters. He is more interested in the views and spreading hatred of law enforcement

[@HeavyMetalAutomotive]

@@stevejette2329 ive noticed all these turds have a full sleeve tats, wonder if that is a requirement

[@katieegan6097]

On the ‘spectating’ encounter, GRRAT JOB and good luck with your civil lawsuit!!!!!

[@gothicbagheera]

The protesters get a C?? Really?? Why not an F for not immediately leaving when asked, having a hostile attitude toward the officer as well, and believing they didn't break any laws when they actually did.

[@vincentpagano5344]

I said mooove

[@duanelawrence6194]

Why should they have to leave boot licker ?

[@gothicbagheera]

@@duanelawrence6194 they had to keave because they were told by an acting agent of the owner of the store they needed to leave, and as the store is private property, they don't get to completely ignore being told to leave that private property without it becoming an illegal act. Just because you don't agree they needed to leave doesn't mean you're not a complete dumbass and are completely wrong.

[@sewerrat7612]

​@@duanelawrence6194trespassing

[@joshiek7839]

@@duanelawrence6194 marxists dont believe in private property until it affects them. Similar to ACAB hate the police until they need protecting. losers all of you.

[@DieselDucy]

Thank you so much for covering this one. I saw this and it boiled my blood when it first happened. Stuff like this is what’s wrong with policing in America

[@wsb4586]

Just one more grift for the municipality, let's face it.

[@DiZZoLabs]

Meanwhile Juan in the boys are living illegally and driving illegally all around us in this state.

[@NoPartySelected]

Thank you! Imagine how I felt! Lol

[@selltheworldgames]

The officer's actions and reasoning in the first video are honestly terrifying. These are exactly the type of officers who’d follow orders to harm or even kill civilians without hesitation or just cause if their masters ordered them to do so. It's scary to think our government is likely intentionally recruiting officers like this on purpose, lying in waiting to crack down on citizens once they understand the current extent of governmental corruption and ultimately stand up to it.

[@chrisboucher2693]

Well deserved A+ for the first interaction

[@NoPartySelected]

Thank you! 🙏🏿

[@hatterson]

The "C" seems very generous to the protesters given they also expressly lied to the officer when they said "Nobody told us to leave" So they: - Set up a protest despite not even remotely understanding the difference between public and private property - Almost assuredly committed trespassing - Lied to the officers Although they're not auditors, given that they intentionally undertook these actions as a protest, I think they should be graded far more stringently as they should be expected to understand at least the basic of where and when they are allowed to protest.

[@armandiic791]

The C is for carnivorous

[@eddyblackmore4188]

​@@armandiic791 Why love one and eat the other? Good point. Time for some Kentucky Fried Poodle.

[@georgecraytin9838]

Lying to the cop should of gotten her an A.

[@crazyaussie7054]

​@eddyblackmore4188 depending on what country you are in, that can be easily arranged!! 😂😂

[@eddyblackmore4188]

@@crazyaussie7054 Honestly, geographical location doesn't really matter. I've never seen a country that didn't have a surplus of stray/impounded cats and/or dogs, which are, when you get right down to it, just another source of protein. In fact, combining animal shelters, soup kitchens and food banks could kill two or three birds with one stone. Okay, eating obligate carnivores isn't particularly healthy (which is just one reason *why* we tend to 'love' some animals and eat others, though what self respecting vegan would bother to listen?) but it's probably a better alternative to starving.

[@MsMsmak]

Everything about these cops makes me sick to my stomach. Outright lying should be a cop disqualifier.

[@disorganizedorg]

I would certainly not hesitate to point out to anyone a cop does business with that the cop is a professional liar and their signature on contracts should be considered suspect. If the cop objected, I'd offer to retract the word "professional"

[@Nexesys]

If cops are suppose to be a city or counties "Finest" then why are they able to lie to the citizens. There needs to be mass corruption investigations on every department. Get rid of Qualified Immunity and Police Unions. All chiefs should be elected not, appointed as well.

[@Mark-gg6iy]

The SCOTUS has already ruled that some LEO's have a right to deceive the public.

[@FirstThenLast13]

Lying is precisely what they are trained to do.

[@disorganizedorg]

@@FirstThenLast13 Yes. But if I lie to them I can be charged. This makes policemen my social inferiors... children in whom we excuse such inappropriate behavior. Perhaps they shouldn't be allowed to buy alcohol until they grow up.

[@christopherscott8272]

Giving tickets for spectating a car show, has to be exactly what these heros signed up to be officers for. When i was a kid and idolized military and law enforcement, this is what came to mind when i wanted to help people.

[@crazyrobots6565]

When I'm in Florida, I guess I have to close my eyes when any vehicles around me are accelerating. I don't see how this could have any negative side effects.

[@Vancev99x]

​@@crazyrobots6565 Nope! Full send brother. Tell the cops you were just trying to be a good citizen! 😅 "Im sorry officer I almost saw those tires spin. I had to shut my eyes and get outta there!" 😂😂

[@BushidoNinja]

Most cops are good. ATA wants you to believe otherwise

[@christopherscott8272]

@BushidoNinja I used to believe that. Now? No. I just can't. Video after video of regular people knowing the laws more than cops. Not only that, but when the "bad" cop acts out and gets violent, the "good" cops will almost never intervene. People are getting falsely arrested and additional charges applied to them to try and cover the cops, which seem to be getting dismissed a lot more since people have started to realize their rights. Complaints get filed on police officers and more often than not, they are found in "no wrong doing" by their superiors. A cop will tell you that ignorance is no excuse for the law. Seems fair enough but cops seem to have double standards because when they get the laws wrong, they love to hide behind good faith and the penalties for them breaking the law seem to be way less than what everyone else would have to face. Let's not even get into how long it takes them to "investigate" themselves when a complaint or allegations come against them. I've seen them arrest people on just the word of a witness but video evidence that shows them doing something illegal takes months to investigate. Then, if you like we can discuss all these bullcrap infractions they love to give people. The window tints (my favorite since they almost always have darker tint) and witness to street racing, and so forth and so on is ridiculous. A real role model.

[@icin4d]

@@BushidoNinja No. Sixty percent should not be in the law enforcement field. There is no such thing as one bad cop in the department.

[@Pumuggl93]

I think you did a really great job with not cutting out the message of the protesters before the cop interaction begins in the 2nd part. Thank you. And thank you for all your work in general. Great content.

[@duanemansel5704]

This was not one rogue officer. This was an entire department setting these people up to stop car shows. Proactive policing like this is probably illegal and unconstitutional.

[@stephengrigg5988]

Yeah, that's why the complaint against the officer was thrown out by his supervisor the very same day.... they don't even try and hide the fact that they don't work for us.

[@robertsmith6655]

My point exactly and as usual, they were just "following orders". And because they were following orders, their bosses will protect their actions, which they obviously did. Wake up people! If this isn't an example of government overreach, then you're sadly mistaken.

[@robertsmith6655]

@@stephengrigg5988 You see how brazen they are when they know they're not gonna be held accountable for anything they do when they go out on these little extortion missions?

[@Mark-gg6iy]

"We're going to give our police their power back, and we are going to give them immunity from prosecution."- 2024 Republican candidate for POTUS Donald Trump, Waukesha, Wisconsin, 2024.

[@robertsmith6655]

@@Mark-gg6iy Just like he said Mexico was gonna pay for the border wall 😅

[@thesuperdingos]

5:54 Why did he need to verify his address? He already had his ID under the threat of arrest.

[@nuclearmedicineman6270]

You have to keep your address updated on your license. They ask because it's an extra charge they can drop on you if your current address isn't the one that's on your license.

[@breadgarlichouse2265]

always just say yes, even if it isn’t current. They won’t know, and you’ll avoid an extra charge

[@TheXxemarosaxx]

@@breadgarlichouse2265if you know it’s current don’t say anything you don’t have to.

[@Isaac_132]

Because the cop was fishing for another charge to slap the guy with.

[@leethax100]

Fishing attempt. They want him to incorrectly state his address so they can accuse him of lying and lock him up for false ID

[@VănÈLầu-j2b]

It's commendable to see informed citizens taking a constructive role in society! Knowledge is power, indeed.

[@Isaac_132]

What this comes down to is _if_ you're standing at a crosswalk waiting to cross the road and a car spins its tires leaving the traffic light, you, the spectator, can be ticketed. That makes sense.

[@timb7775]

It's up to officer discretion.

[@rickroller420]

Technically the law states if the suspect “willingly” observed, and since the guy parked his car and walked to the location to where the cars were driving it would make him a willing observer. Someone standing at the crosswalk before the cars show up did not travel with the intent to watch the cars doing the illegal actions.

[@Isaac_132]

@@rickroller420 Someone going to Cars and Coffee didn't go there with the intent to watch cars doing illegal stuff like spinning their tires but that didn't stop the cops from citing people and dragging them into court. The law was intended to be used for things like street take-overs and drag racing but all that matters to the cops is hemming people up for stupid stuff because they can.

[@rickroller420]

@ that makes a lot of sense thank you

[@thomasmann3560]

They get a C? They clearly stated, we do this all the time. That means they are well informed of the trespass and protest laws. That means they clearly broke the law and tried to run before getting a charge. The protesters should have an F

[@crazyaussie7054]

100%!!!!

[@Lupinotuum66]

Yeap.

[@misterpolish]

Yeah I don’t agree with his grade on the second clip at all

[@ryan7900]

Everyone on the second clip deserved an F

[@nunya8010]

I think he's vegan and showing support, he mentioned it in an ad.

[@timothywait9457]

imagine it before the police man left he droped a macdonolds happy meal in the car

[@Samuel-H]

Thank you officer for protecting us from people watching cars, you’ve made the world a safer place!! 🙄

[@carma459]

While children are being abused by adults and filmed.

[@timb7775]

Wow, I can't believe you actually support these cops trying to give tickets to people simply watching nice cars drive by.

[@Samuel-H]

@@timb7775 I’m not sure if you missed my sarcasm, or if I’m missing yours 🤔 but either way we both agree that this is a ridiculous reason for cops to stop people

[@charlie15627]

"No, you're not leaving." The first order to stay was given prior to his arm being struck by the vehicle, not after.

[@phukyerpheefees]

@charlie15627 This. Exactly this.

[@marsstubblefield]

That's not really an order to stay - it's ambiguous. "Stop the car" - that's an order (lawful or otherwise) The prior statement is not . . .

[@phukyerpheefees]

@@marsstubblefield What's ambiguous about it? What other meaning could that phrase possibly have?

[@marsstubblefield]

@@phukyerpheefees How about this . . . She says she has blond hair. Cops says you don't have blond hair. He says this because he wants to detain her based on a witness description. She's supposed to know this? Lawful orders need to be clear. "Stop the car" is clear "You're not leaving" is not

[@phukyerpheefees]

@marsstubblefield Nice strawman, now address the actual point. In what way can "You're not leaving," spoken by a cop, be interpreted, other than, "You're not free to leave."?

[@orgzan]

Your grades are a joke. Protesters broke the law. Officer told them they are not free to go. She continued to back up. Officer reach in to stop an alleged criminal from fleeing.

[@ronnybello909]

All vegans are criminals and they're no vegans for all their food is grown from animal waste

[@rainer40k7]

Amen. I know he likes to grade off of "lawful conduct", but sometimes he is so off the mark.

[@davidnoah9560]

How those boots taste ?

[@JimyOfficialEats]

You are bootlicker lmfao

[@jimlawton4184]

If Mr Maat is reading the comments, I would recommend finding representation for the hearing in December. This is such an obvious violation of rights that you deserve full justice. It’s ridiculous yet unsurprising that a supervisor could find no wrongdoing in this encounter. How dare you stand on the side of the road and watch cars go by!?! 🥵

[@Mark-gg6iy]

"We're going to give our police their power back, and we are going to give them immunity from prosecution."- 2024 Republican candidate for POTUS Donald Trump, Waukesha, Wisconsin, 2024.

[@icin4d]

@@Mark-gg6iy OH yay. Immunity to one of the largest cult of thugs in the US. Can't see how that will go wrong.

[@takeadeepbreathin]

@@Mark-gg6iyyup. It’s only going to get way worse under Trump.

[@amsb4dafunk558]

⁠@@Mark-gg6iy The context Is In regards to the arrests/deportations Of The 10 million+ non-legals that Biden, and Harris let traipes into the country And Past actions by President Trump Has shown that he is not an ideologue, he can be reasoned with Also His judge appointees are Constitutionalists Not Liberal Activists But Very likely you can not be Shown, or Told So No matter.

[@joycegriffin3652]

​yea, look what the Ignoramus' have gotten us into.

[@deepakacharya777]

The cop witnessed the race, he should receive a citation too. What a stupid law!

[@Beaky707]

The cop should have been pulling the so called racers over but instead they go bother thr ppl watching😂THEY ARE ROBBING CITIZENS WHILE BEING ARMED

[@stephengrigg5988]

Yep

[@krystilize1573]

Watching in of itself is not a crime. It's watching it knowingly that is a crime.

[@xylozerosoul9897]

​@@krystilize1573but the cop would have had to know what he was seeing was illegal in the first place to arrest the others for it 😂

[@krystilize1573]

@@xylozerosoul9897 yeah 100 percent, the cop had no probable cause for the arrest. My point is that simply the act of watch by itself is not a crime. It has to be accompanied by knowing that a race or illegal performance will happen.

[@sharistrazz3313]

HOW can a citizen standing on a public sidewalk WATCHING CARS LEAVE A RACETRACK PARKING AREA BE ACCUSED OF A MOVING VIOLATION? ARE THESE COPS DELUSIONAL!? SO EVERY DRIVER & PASSENGER OF OTHER CARS, PEDESTRIANS WAITING FOR A CROSSWALK SIGNAL, FAMILY WALKING TO THEIR CAR PARKED DOWN THE STREET, SOMEONE WAITING FOR A PUBLIC CITY BUS, ANYONE THAT SEES A CAR FROM THE RACE SHOULD BE TICKETED & ARRESTED JUST AS THE COPS DID THIS GUY!!! THIS IS SUCH BS!! 🤬 IMO!!

[@zackcinq-mars2129]

Go back and read the law as he states it. Its not every driver or passenger. Its the people who showed up with the knowledge and intent to view said illegal driving. Do I think that law was applied correctly in this instance, no. Do I think the law should stay on the books, yes.

[@stwillz01]

This country... we can literally be arrested for anything.

[@XDRosenheim]

Correct. That exact sentence can be applied to any country in the world.

[@2guys1cliplol]

I'm sure multiple cops have been fired for taking there bad days out on civilians and arresting them on bogus charges

[@Stuffthings17]

@@stwillz01 look into other countries, bud. It's messed up here sure but you have the freedom to say it's messed up without being executed.

[@davidcolin6519]

@@XDRosenheim Actually, most EU countries have much stronger protections, and virtually ALL of them have far better trained POs than literally anywhere in the US. IIRC, the longest required training for any US PO is 6 months. The shortest training period for any West European Police Officer that I am aware of is in the UK (21 weeks), but the UK is not in the EU. Most EU countries have a much longer Police Officer training scheme. I live in Spain, where any of the "real" POs (ie not Policia Local) are required to complete a 2 year training course.

[@joodajoo]

Thats the point. We are a group of corporations masquerading as a government. Our only culture is making money

[@mikedotbob]

1:52 it’s a “moving violation” to be “standing still” and “watching” 😂 I hope the judge can see how ridiculous this law is. Words mean things.

[@FirstThenLast13]

Those tyrants know that harassing people for the crime of "looking" is way easier than actually protecting and serving the public.

[@crazyrobots6565]

Looking at cars is illegal? How could that prossibly not violate the first amendment? As a federal judge in Florida recently told Governor DeSantis, "it's the First Amendment, stupid"

[@zackcinq-mars2129]

The law is specifically about being in the place where you know this is going to happen with the intent to watch. I agree that it feels gray constitutionally, but in practice if you have frequent drag races in your vicinity, you would also want the instigators of said drag races to be punished. I don't think what happened in this video is what the statute was made for and don't think those people should have been charged, but I see the merit in the statute existing.

[@socialwagner]

*Not even in North Korea standing around watching cars is a “moving violation” *

[@Rightrudder2]

Cops continue to amaze me.......Watching cars is a crime????? Yet, if a person watches a murder they then have evidence????.......How does a person become a cop with absolutely no knowledge of law.???????

[@Tijuanabill]

You know how you find out of someone is vegan? You don't have to, they already told you.

[@ajnathan9490]

I, literally, laughed out loud at this 😂🤣😂

[@Sage-Thyme]

I really don't understand what they think is going to happen if we stop keeping livestock for food and other products. Whole swathes of animals would, if no longer useful for those purposes, be nothing but a burden and would be destroyed as there would be nobody to look after them.

[@mr.duanesharpe]

@@Sage-ThymeYou mean nature would multiply and be overan? Then yes.

[@Asurez]

​@@Sage-Thyme that's a really bad argument against veganism tbh. "We kill the animals and also breed them to kill more of them, because otherwise they would die or not exist." Yeah, great. Because cows, pigs and chicken never existed outside of factory farms.

[@Sage-Thyme]

@mr.duanesharpe No I mean most domesticated animals require humans to survive and if they were no longer cost effective to keep they would either be slaughtered or end up dying due to things life hoof rot lead to sepsis.

[@oxyfee6486]

So when the two cars in front of me at a red light decide to race then I’m breaking the law by watching them pull away from me?😂

[@selltheworldgames]

100%, how dare you see somebody commit a traffic violation. You're lucky they don't throw you in the gulag for even thinking about that scenario.

[@lolabigcups7121]

I know this isnt supposed to be funny but that man got a whole tv strapped to his torso. Im in here hollering 😂😂😂😂😂

[@skapunkoialternativeliving6522]

So you have to also bear in mind. Police officers in general do not know the law themselves. They go for training to watch people, but that's it. They don't know the law themselves.

[@jamescouture775]

Most know they are breaking the law they just lie so they can use qualified immunity .

[@technne-gu1yu]

You realize they know the law they just learn to fake ignorance

[@skapunkoialternativeliving6522]

@technne-gu1yu I don't know about that. A lot of them do not know the Constitution, just like a lot of people do not know the Constitution they know. The basic law like arrest and certain things. Yes, but when you get really deep into the laws of the land most of them do not know that I don't know. Half of them myself. But I'm learning slowly as we go along because it's good to know your rights, especially when you get pulled over.

[@Vancev99x]

They also hire dumb ones on purpose. Can't have high i.q. cops we need dumb yes men on the team.

[@Mark-gg6iy]

"We're going to give our police their power back, and we are going to give them immunity from prosecution."- 2024 Republican candidate for POTUS Donald Trump, Waukesha, Wisconsin, 2024.

[@colingomez5934]

Those protestors are absolutely infuriating. The smugness is real

[@rudmad00]

People said the same thing about abolitionists/women's suffrage/civil rights protestors.

[@tiptoeurchin]

I couldn't agree more. I dislike vegans like this even more than cops. Every one of them is wearing an animal product somewhere in their clothing. I'll never understand how they think my food choices are their business. It's clear they've never been held accountable for anything

[@scottallen608]

@@rudmad00doesn’t make them right. I’ve been vegan for 15 years, but these people are breaking the law and making the rest of us look like assholes

[@frocat5163]

@@rudmad00 *"People said the same thing about abolitionists/women's suffrage/civil rights protestors."* Are you seriously comparing people protesting/advocating for the end of slavery, women's right to vote, and equality for people of all ethnicities to...protesting to get people to make a dietary choice the protestors have made? Seriously? Fun Fact: Eating animal protein isn't actually morally or ethically wrong, no matter how many militant vegans get their panties in a bunch over it. Not all protests are created equal, and not all causes are equally important. Convincing people to switch to veganism is about the least important cause in human history.

[@themysteryofbluebirdboulevard]

​@@rudmad00 indeed. Then they can be arrested too if they break laws

[@pridapit]

A cop lying? Go figure. But they actually expect us to believe liars? It's such an oxymoron. How can we trust people who lie to us so casually???.

[@deodatsingh4621]

Welcome to America where every public servant broke they oath to the Constitution

[@briancardio6567]

Hate to be too political,but welcome to DeSantis 's Florida.

[@Mark-gg6iy]

"We're going to give our police their power back, and we are going to give them immunity from prosecution."- 2024 Republican candidate for POTUS Donald Trump, Waukesha, Wisconsin, 2024.

[@davidcross4596]

You left out the rest of the quote...' Immunity from doing their job legally"

[@illuzio9142]

That terrifies me ​@@Mark-gg6iy

[@jong7513]

Spectating while Black

[@jishwah1889]

I agree but tbf the lady cop was going to cite 3 people based on the conversation between cops

[@paulengels6926]

Always a race thing when black cops are way more violent and racist towards blacks

[@jcc777]

He forgot the other option, fight it in court and force the cop to come into court to defend his actions

[@michaelb9672]

Plants do not want to die too. Where are the people for the ethical treatment of plants?

[@violet_skrs]

funnily enough, certain plants do actually hold a certain level of awareness/consciousness of their surroundings as well as how they interact with their environment. various trees and mushrooms being a measureable/proven example of this. meat, plants, it's all just food choice and the "circle of life" that humans have evolved with. it's ok to farm livestock, but admittedly the U.S. has a problem with it's coroporations over doing it in an unsafe & unethical manor for both worker, livestock, and damaging the environment in the process. something that drastically impacts the global climate is beef production, because of the methane released by those cows. corpo's over do it by such a large margine, that cow crap is damaging the atmosphere. would be impressive if it wasn't slowly contributing to our deaths.

[@crimeandcrafting]

I was thinking the same thing. A plant will grow in the direction of the sun, roses have thorns and a million other things about plants that prove they want to propagate the species. Oh well, live and let live 😂😂

[@GarlandFarms]

Quadrillions more animals suffer and die every year by the lethal crop protection measures carried out by the toxic monocropping that produces the items on the vegan menu than from all of animal agriculture.

[@squonk2902]

I consume plants second hand, via the animals I eat

[@Mrwutevah]

No need to make a fool out of yourself in criticizing these protesters with such nonsense statements. The matter here is on the legality of the actions, not the content of the speech.

[@jonsmith5058]

Those vegan protesters need to learn that acting like an ahole and telling people they are abusers and arguing like this won’t convince anyone.

[@Sheerstress]

Similar to protestors who block traffic or prevent people from getting home or to work. All you end up doing is pissing off a LOT of people who might otherwise be sympathetic to your cause.

[@chrismoltisanti]

Stating the obvious doesn't make people assholes. Facts. Eating animals is unnecessary and unethical. If you can't figure that out yourself as an independently thinking adult, then you're the asshole.

[@SecuR0M]

They're not trying to convince average people. They're making the experience unpleasant so regular people vote with their wallets and hurt the only people who can change anything: billionaires. A Walmart that loses all its customers because of vegan protests hurts the bottom line way more than a dozen nerds not buying meat.

[@jonsmith5058]

@@chrismoltisanti you’re an asshole. Hope that helps you learn how to (not) convince someone to change how they act? No? It didnt make you rethink your actions. Wow what a shocker….

[@EnhancedTrashBin]

@@chrismoltisanti if we're being technical here, then being an asshole is not what that is at all, in fact you're mixing an insult with someone that is ignorant/close-minded which these 2 words are completely different. Which, "If you can't figure that out yourself as an independently thinking adult" welp, then I doubt education can help you with that.

[@TeamLumix]

Please don't tell me AtA is vegan and that's why he's giving those moronic protestors a C and not an F for knowingly violating the law.

[@th3suffering]

The protesters get a C when they refuse to leave the store when asked, multiple times, and then attempt to flee while being detained?? How is her action different than if he had pulled he over for a traffic violation and she attempted to leave? I think, while the cop was hyperbolic regarding "being hit", he was within his rights to reach in to attempt to immobilize the vehicle to stop her from fleeing. He deserves way better than an F, especially considering she didnt end up arrested or even removed from the car.

[@HankRearden]

This channel is losing cred. Not a close call. Protestors should’ve been charged.

[@just4931]

The cop tells them they're just having a conversation , the vegan says ok and starts leaving and then the cop stick his hand in her vehicle , says they're not allowed to leave cause they hit him, he hadn't detained them or told them they were detained so he has no right to shove his hand in their car.

[@gruthdorah7244]

Yes, the C is questionable. The only positive things they did were having the interest to express their opinions with use of the first amendment and not being violent. That does not compare to staying on private property after being told to leave, chanting loudly and being confrontational to law enforcement. This sadly makes them look defiant and untrustworthy. This way, their message will not reach the hearts of all those shoppers. Regarding the officer: He did overreact, but depending on the information he received, he could have had reasonable suspicion or even probable cause. He might not have the temper necessary, but an F? It is important to be fair in grading law enforcement. They are on duty and have to behave flawlessly. But we see Ds or Bs for officers too rarely. As we praise auditors for their good deeds, we should do the same for officers, if they deserve it, of course. + It is crucial to know what behavior of the police is to be expected and praised. I primarily use this channel to learn the constitution, but I also wish to understand and work with the police. Otherwise, we only hate on them, without the chance of a beneficial discussion on both sides.

[@Xaladen]

@just4931 why are you lying and gaslighted when the fucking video is RIGHT HERE?

[@jamesrowe3606]

Thanks for your input bootlicker. Preventing a trespasser from leaving and thereby terminating the trespass is not only illogical, it's as dumb as dirt.

[@DumbAsh00]

Theres no way that law is constitutional. If taken to a higher court it would be deemed unconstitutional

[@luciddream2033]

Why? I could easily see it being an unlawful assembly.

[@Pedro-and-Kail]

​@@luciddream2033found the bootlicker

[@luciddream2033]

@Pedro-and-Kail if not wanting the streets I pay taxes on being taken over by a bunch of thugs makes me a bootlicker, then I am proud to be one.

[@bikeguyhd1035]

@@luciddream2033wake up. This was not a takeover.

[@zackcinq-mars2129]

I see it as more of a law against assembly than a law against viewing or filming. If you weren't intending to be in the place knowing that such illegal driving actions were going to take place, then you didn't break the law. Note that I don't think the people in the video broke the law (unless other things were happening before our video started).

[@SteveInFLALand1]

Citing people for WATCHING cars, regardless of from where they are viewing, seems like a 1st and possibly 4th amendment violation to me. What the hell is Florida’s legislature thinking??? This is supposed to be a “conservative” state. Our legislature has abandoned the people they are supposed to serve with this law.

[@daveblackman816]

They clearly should’ve just kept their eyes closed. How dare they

[@patG85]

They shouldn't be allowed to disturb the business like that that's gotta be the very definition of disturbing the peace ... This the cops should get involved with .. but too busy with citizens for watching a car show!!!

[@MrJbee73]

They need a whole job

[@HPLovesCraftsCat]

nope

[@gwanael34]

That's not what disturbin the peace means. Why are you people so pro free speech until it's something you disagree with. Then you outright say that it doesn't matter and they should be arrested for something you would never accept otherwise.

[@MrJbee73]

@@gwanael34 trespassing isn't free speech

[@gwanael34]

@@MrJbee73 Being arrested for trespassing when you are litteraly in the process of leaving is something y'all always cry about but now that's it's protestors you disagree with you don't care.

[@dth91]

That last one was so rough lmao “the only crime we committed was not going with the status quo” 😂

[@bagoegg22]

The protesters sense of entitlement is the funniest thing. Reminds me I need to get some more beef at the store.

[@mathemeatloaf1000]

Citizens of Palm Beach, please make sure to point your home surveillance cameras away from the street. God forbid someone speed down your block!

[@Andy-te1mw]

So, if you watch it on KZbin, does that mean you broke the law?

[@mathemeatloaf1000]

@ great point! ATA entrapped all of us 😡

[@janasmith6602]

Because he knew that he was wrong!!!

[@PerryInterstellarHarry]

To serve and protect them selves.

[@whitewatersarah9824]

This is insanity

[@m.g.7828]

This is America

[@reed510]

Land o’ Free

[@HPLovesCraftsCat]

so much for land of the free

[@BabsKaz]

Welcome to the Police state 😡

[@johnshoemakerpbc]

Ahhh gotta love Palm Beach Sheriff’s office. Sitting on their butt during a car show then arresting people on the corner watching them leave picking them off like animals. My question would have been why didn’t the little kid and his dad get a citation too? Why just him?

[@thepax2621]

"Looking" is apparently now against the law 🤦🏻‍♀️... What kind of BS is this?

[@rubiconbaron9662]

Imagine giving people citations for watching cars in public and thinking that you’re a hero.

[@zackcinq-mars2129]

The cops that did this in my neighborhood were "hero's" We had multiple street races every weekend through residential streets in our city blocks. Cops put a stop to it over the course of a year and a half. Its laws like this that actually make a difference.

[@JakeTheTrouserSnake]

KZbin completely stopped giving me your notifications a few months ago, glad I found the channel again!

[@thomasharris5151]

@18:11 sorry….! To walk INSIDE a private business, protesting by preventing shoppers from Purchasing meat harming the company’s profits is dumb.

[@kendallneason3645]

It would be smart to protest outside and legal, but much less impactful.

[@asteraoth8131]

They are also protesting the wrong place.. why protest a store that doesn't actually have control over how animals are treated in meat farms? I get they don't want people to eat meat, then protest to make vegan foods actually affordable.

[@Lupinotuum66]

This is the woke crowd. They feel they have the moral high ground on any issue that concerns them, therefore they have a right to scream and act like assholes. I'm so glad, that America has another 4 years of being great again.

[@b00nd0cks8int]

It would be very ignorant to think a supermarket is public property lol

[@thomasharris5151]

@@Lupinotuum66 it’s not being “woke”.,, I’m tired of this highjacking narrative. “Woke” (was used by black America)is being aware and not sleep to lies told by the establishment. NOW with that being said, I agree that these type of people are DUMB and stereotypically vote a certain way😁. Just like DUMB people that’ll raid & climb the capitol wall stereotypically vote a certain way… There’s STUPID folks on both sides… and these vegan protestors here are complete losers to me….

[@Dexx1s]

"Then sue me". But that's exactly the problem. Nobody can sue you. Any lawsuit is paid out by the state, not you personally.

[@SecuR0M]

That's a good thing. You've clearly never been in a suit. Handing down a judgment is one thing, collecting is another. Individuals do not have the kind of income to cover these egregious violations of rights. They do have the time in years of life to be placed into indentured service for the state to pay for the costs they incur to it. At least partially. Make them pay the state after the state pays out is the actual solution.

[@1fortheroad1]

They couldn't get the drivers so they went for any else they could

[@kurtkaster5666]

That officer Schultz girl is a real piece of work. The arrogance she exudes is just gross.

[@markbanks4738]

🤢🤮🤢🤮

[@vidura]

Also she has a very nice behind.

[@Wolfie713]

She just needs to get laid really hard. Then she'll be more respectful towards others instead of being on edge.

[@likecrazyhorse]

Schultz is the train the department runs on, you can see it in her walk

[@Wolfie713]

She just needs to get a good dose of "special attention." 😉

[@patG85]

U need to be arrested for trespassing and disturbing the peace and trying to leave the scene this lady is horrible

[@brianhillis3701]

They should have charged the vegans. Crimes were committed. Trespassing was absolutely done. Threatening the officer. "Watch out I am leaving" is two crimes. "We were never asked to leave" is another crime. ATA got another one wrong. 😊

[@phukyerpheefees]

​@@brianhillis3701 AtA not only got another one wrong but hid it in the back half of the video that gets watched less.

[@gwanael34]

Holy FK you people will literally complelty flip your entire values and morals when it comes to a group you disagree with its insane. If this happened to anti abortion protestors you'd all be losing your shit.

[@Foojaleeckalikeelamaka]

The police officer said it was a cordial conversation & then demanded them to stop.

[@MayBeYouTubin]

DON'T REPRESENT YOURSELF! GET A LAWYER!

[@OverDriveah]

Why?

[@hashbrown4781]

​@@OverDriveah Even lawyers get a lawyer to represent them. I dunno all the reasons, but a common quote is something like: The lawyer who represents themself has a fool for a client.

[@timb7775]

To fit a simple "traffic ticket"? Seems pretty easy to win. Now if they want to sue the cops for rights violations then sure get a lawyer.

[@Tb0n3]

​@@OverDriveahis the other commenter pointed out it's a pretty well-known rule. The reason is when you are defendant you are directly involved and it could be very difficult to look at things objectively which is what is required for a proper defense.

[@TiNRiB]

​@@OverDriveahit's about the danger of incriminating yourself. A lawyer's word is not yours.

[@chaspruitt2610]

This is insane, the officer used this law completely out of context!! 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@Mark-gg6iy]

"We're going to give our police their power back, and we are going to give them immunity from prosecution."- 2024 Republican candidate for POTUS Donald Trump, Waukesha, Wisconsin, 2024.

[@alli3219]

​@@Mark-gg6iy Exactly. I fear for all my trans sisters over in the States... Unmitigated police abuse, in conjunction with transphobia - that's Trump for ya

[@Nick-hi9gx]

Oh come on, we all know EXACTLY why the police would endeavor to hand out spectating tickets, and pull over everyone they can. 1. tickets generate wealth for the state, which in turn gives PDs more power in arguing over their budgets. 2. tickets get promotions, benefits like preferred treatment for requested days off, and it keeps the officers busy doing easy, almost always safe work, rather than going after more meaningful crime. 3. they then have reason to stop whoever they want, can profile to their heart's content, and fish for more tickets or warrants, which refers back to both 1. and 2. 4. Dopamine. Stopping people, holding them, giving them a ticket all gives tyrants dopamine.

[@samuraiS30v]

18:31 you can’t be inside the place of business disrupting business while you protest in order for it to be a peaceful protest you must be peacefully as assembly. I need not disrupting or breaking any laws.

[@50centHotDog]

Tell that to the tea party.

[@sheanmassey]

Dont forget to purchase your driving blindfolds, folks ! Without them you too may CRIMINALLY witness a minor traffic infraction ! As my dad used to say: DONT DO CRIMES, WEAR YOUR BLINDS !

[@legobumb]

There's no way it's constitutional to have such a law that makes it illegal to spectate. If you can't trespass my eyes from seeing things while standing in public, then there's no bloody way in hell this law is constitutional...

[@Mark-gg6iy]

You are obviously uninformed about the myriad of laws in the USA. One easy example is that standing still on a sidewalk can be a violation of law in many jurisdictions. Impeding traffic can be charged. Vagrancy laws have been on the books for decades. If you do not have >$10 on your person, you can be charged. Furthermore, America just proved it is embracing fascism with its latest presidential election so if you are a student of history you may notice similarities with Germany 1925-45 and the USA today going forward. Lastly, "We're going to give our police their power back, and we are going to give them immunity from prosecution."- 2024 Republican candidate for POTUS Donald Trump, Waukesha, Wisconsin, 2024.

[@legobumb]

​@@Mark-gg6iy No, I'm no expert on law by any means. I'm just astounded that there's such a law that prohibits people from standing in public and simply observing things around them. Without a doubt in my mind this citation can be challenged in court and beaten. And I would go so far as to say that this law should be altered to be more specific than it's currently worded, or just straight-up stricken as being unconstitutional. I've seen many videos of people challenging the constitutionality of various laws throughout the US states and their counties and cities, and these people are making progress. So yeah, while there's many obscure laws (particularly one prohibiting the mere status of being homeless, which I find to be just as wild), I have no doubt that it will eventually be challenged one day and found to be unreasonable.

[@OfficerTyreek]

@@Mark-gg6iyya I’m pretty sure none of that’s true

[@Mark-gg6iy]

@@legobumb Unlike you, I do not share you're optimism, especially in the right-wing mindset of so many Americans, especially those in the SE US states.

[@Mark-gg6iy]

@@OfficerTyreek Your comment belies your ignorance.

[@extofer]

My 4 year old loves cars and we take him all the time to cars and coffee events in our area. This is insane.

[@boomnews815]

Your son could very well get a moving violation.

[@krane15]

The car show has nothing to do with the cops manufacturing a crime out of watching the cars leave the show.

[@boomnews815]

@@krane15 The cops were enforcing an exciting law.

[@mr.duanesharpe]

@@boomnews815…and arrested for resisting arrest for failing to identify.