Man, that Gweduck almost looks like a PBY Catalina without the strut between the fuselage and the wing. I could easily see it as a decent light transport for remote areas to get time-critical materials and personnel around if it was a bit larger.
@BerryTheBnnuy2 жыл бұрын
Looks to me more like a Grumman Goose, and I now have a new plan for a flying camper... As much as I want a Goose, a Gweduck is much more realistic. They're a lot less expensive and it's close enough in style to a Goose that I'm willing to settle for that, especially given that it's not nearly a century old. Only real issue is that they're kit planes, so they carry all the federal inspection and regulation baggage that goes with that.
@stradivarioushardhiantz51794 жыл бұрын
Why Be-200, A-42 & GA600 doesn't on the list
@paulmorelli2803 Жыл бұрын
I would like to see the original Pan Am flying boat. And see if it could be updated for flight.
@paulmorelli2803 Жыл бұрын
Can you do a retrospective on the Pan Am Flying boats of the '30s-'40s. And any planned updates on that design
@edilbertosantana83074 жыл бұрын
Thank you !!
@paulmorelli280311 ай бұрын
Privateer looks like a P-38 The Lightning
@kevinberry45814 жыл бұрын
versatility. Like the Viking CL215-515 and have seen them in action many times here fighting fires. I have long loved the idea of seaplanes and have said it would be a good idea to set up a fleet of the Russian Beirev BE200's along the west coast. Like 2 or 3 in each of say Seattle, portland and somewhere along San Francisco-San Diego area. So when the fires get going could call in joint strike coordinating them all to line up and continually drop on it to control OP l and extinguish wildfires. They could be called to anywhere needed. Saving lives and preventing extinction due to loss of habitat. They are jet ppl powered and can fly lots faster than the Viking as well as hauling more than twice the water. Even scooping seawater to douse the would be better than
@gormauslander3 жыл бұрын
Speccing into all ground effect builds was not something I expected seaplane mains to do.
@edilbertosantana83074 жыл бұрын
Fantastic ..Great video.
@automotiveterritory4 жыл бұрын
Many thanks! Which of these is your favorite?
@kevinberry45814 жыл бұрын
I like the Gweduck due to the heritage and twin otter for versitility.
@automotiveterritory4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing
@paulmorelli2803 Жыл бұрын
Can you help me find a amphibious plane? I think the nam was Sky Challenger. Engine behind the canopy witha air pusher. Seats 4 parachute & special gold fleck paint on wings, from paint designer from Nissan
@davidveenbaas41442 жыл бұрын
If I was younger I would go for it.
@EricPham-gr8pg10 ай бұрын
That what is belt and road initiative ( close surface and follow shore line ) for safety
@myemail54572 жыл бұрын
Airfish 8 camper model, for sure..
@dallesamllhals9161 Жыл бұрын
I LOVE the Do 18....but the Dornier Seastar is bloody expensive 😞
@eddysanta12133 жыл бұрын
Nice.
@automotiveterritory3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Which of these is your favorite? Cheers!
@moemensultan63744 жыл бұрын
Nice , very Nice !!
@automotiveterritory4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Which of these is your favorite?
@moemensultan63744 жыл бұрын
@@automotiveterritory The Privateer and the airfish 8
@moemensultan63744 жыл бұрын
what about you ?
@ingridschellhaas70412 жыл бұрын
To us, it is very interesting, that the Airfish of Widgetworks is presented between a number of waterstarting aircrafts. This fact is supporting the theory, that Airfish is indeed less a boat and more an aircraft. On the other hand, there are no videos showing first Airfish overflying second Airfish or evading the big ship, which is always the argument.
@automotiveterritory4 жыл бұрын
Taking a look at some of the larger amphibious aircraft. Which of these do you find to be the most exciting?
@carloko083 жыл бұрын
amazing aircraft, but dude, what is the music you use for this video? would be great you can tell me ;)
@mochabear882 жыл бұрын
privateer
@m1a2abramsmainbattletank582 жыл бұрын
I would prefer the air fish 8.
@chandrachurniyogi83943 жыл бұрын
both the Viking CANADAIR CL-215-515 & Viking TWIN OTTER seaplane could serve well as a cheap airborne multi role ASW aircraft especially those who cannot afford the B737-800 based P-8I Neptune multi role maritime ASW aircraft!!! it needs long range tanks with in-flight refueling capability & has to be armed as well with guided anti-ship missiles & torpedoes!!!
@danielsmolensky62063 жыл бұрын
Airfish-8 is not a flying boat, Its an Ekranoplan which was invented by the soviets
@linusromey5613 жыл бұрын
The Airfish 8 was designed by Hanno Fischer of Germany.
@manstarxranx92092 жыл бұрын
PRIVATIR SUPER !
@belajarsaham32735 ай бұрын
what are you looking for ? a ship that can fly? or a plane that can swim?
@ps3301 Жыл бұрын
I want one.
@machahitheshkumarreddy43344 жыл бұрын
Where can we park them
@machahitheshkumarreddy43344 жыл бұрын
@Toneri Ōtsutsuki every owner of these planes may not have the private island
but then what is the difference between a flying boat and an amphibious plane ?
@automotiveterritory4 жыл бұрын
A flying boat usually can't use ground airfields at all, while amphibious planes come with landing gear for both surfaces
@moemensultan63744 жыл бұрын
@@automotiveterritory Thanks for the info
@moemensultan63744 жыл бұрын
@@automotiveterritory Thanks for the info
@automotiveterritory4 жыл бұрын
Anytime
@agusb65052 жыл бұрын
Indonesia big market 16.377 islands
@NON1553 жыл бұрын
WHY THE FUTURE PLANE NOT MAKEING HYBRID BOAT PLANE??
@automotiveterritory3 жыл бұрын
Do you mean one with electric motors?
@NON1553 жыл бұрын
@@automotiveterritory one electric motora and a Fuel Motors. The Answer Yes
@DaGoonR2 жыл бұрын
Well these are all nice and good. I'm looking for something I can live in, with a bathroom and a kitchen and a bed. Something that sips fuel at .05 gallons per hour has a cruse speed of 400 knots and a range of 15000 nm. I'd like a glide ratio of 120/1 ish Oh yeah and it has to be fully electric, financeable at 100 USD a month and have leather interior. If it could land on water I'd go 110 USD.
@automotiveterritory2 жыл бұрын
You have got a nice vision but I don't think that there is something like this available at the moment.
@atomicwedgie81762 жыл бұрын
...and 2 cup holders!
@robertcornelius35142 жыл бұрын
You're 50 years too late.
@mac8ist3 жыл бұрын
9:13 narrator burps
@EricPham-gr8pg10 ай бұрын
Tomahawk can copy it too
@gerardhaubert82104 жыл бұрын
Kodiak is the most versatile
@automotiveterritory4 жыл бұрын
It's a nice one for sure.
@jesussaidiamthewaytotrutha22113 жыл бұрын
the nanny, how much credit do you have available to take care of the babies that will arrive from mommy America 2628? there are babies parked in the nursery yard a few blocks from here
@stranraerwal3 жыл бұрын
the off-speaker has an interesting accent...south-American or Irish?
@fielroht514 жыл бұрын
😉
@automotiveterritory4 жыл бұрын
How did you like the lineup?
@wayinfront14 жыл бұрын
Why do so many KZbin docs have these weird, distorted, robotic alien voices doing the commentaries? Can't they find anyone with a normal English speaking voice?
@automotiveterritory4 жыл бұрын
Why do so many intolerant native English speakers come here and start whining about my accent? So annoying
@adamrosenberg43673 жыл бұрын
Bruh, I hate those too, but this dude is obviously Actually narrating his video. Accent =/= Robot
@rollingthunder2774 жыл бұрын
I ended this video at :16 seconds because the producer insists on using a synthetic voice (and a damn poor one, at that). Even a rotten announcer is better than synthetic. Shame on you, cheapo!
@automotiveterritory4 жыл бұрын
Farewell. I narrate on my own, probably you can't tolerate a person with an accent? Fine by me
@rollingthunder2774 жыл бұрын
@@automotiveterritory The narrative is mechanical, pronounced poorly, choppy with very strange inflection. If it is in fact you, dear son, you're only a step away from being a totally integrated cyborg. Color me unbelieving: cheap synthetic word-to-voice software. And I really can't understand why it's difficult to admit it is synthesized.
@anthonyo.thector324 жыл бұрын
@@rollingthunder277 "one step away from being a totally integrated cyborg"?!!!😂😂😂 But seriously, can't you at least try to be more tolerant.....and grateful?
@米空軍パイロット4 жыл бұрын
@@rollingthunder277 Are you not intelligent enough to recognize a human voice when you hear one?
@rollingthunder2774 жыл бұрын
@@米空軍パイロット I believe I am intelligent enough. But more to the point, I am a professional announcer. I have voiced well over 100,000 commercials in my lifetime, won over 3 dozen American Advertising Awards (11 of them Gold) and 3 CLEOs. I have performed radio, TV, national and international narrations, documentaries and films. I think after 55 years of doing voice work, I can tell a human from synthesized voice work when I hear it. And at your leisure, I will oblige comparing brain pans with you...any day.
@shemdickson44454 ай бұрын
TO THIS “MODERN SEAPLANE WAVE BLOGGER [AUTOMOTIVE TERRITORY: TRENDING NEWS & CAR REVIEWS],” ’ALTHOUGH A COMMERCE’S DEMAND IS AN IMMENSE, AQUA-FLIGHT FUTURE COMMERCE,’ “EACH MINIATURE SEAPLANE SERIES IS IMPRESSIVELY DIVERSE” AND Y’ALL, “LATEST SEAPLANE VIEWERS, WHAT A TODAY’S GLOSSARY!!” 🛩️🛩️
@rocketchicken54218 ай бұрын
Great! Exepts it's bullshit. Almost all of these are not flying boats, but conversion kits. I forgot to stay away from this channel. Been reminded about that when i heard the voice again. Heard too much inaccurate info from that voice. Thanks, but no thanks.