Oh, but Muhammad is mentioned in the bible. "Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." ~ Matthew 7:15
@ChristSpeech3 ай бұрын
@@Roosauec W
@bbgun0613 ай бұрын
Brilliant!
@nawksybawks3 ай бұрын
Clever lol
@bacontheclown25023 ай бұрын
W
@itzbamy3 ай бұрын
You forgot Razeale 33:1 i tell you. Beware of bearded people from the desert that speak Arabic, for they are the greatest deceivers
@LionOf.Christ3 ай бұрын
The Internet is The Worst thing happened to Islam 💀
@ratilantgull6023 ай бұрын
Yes it’s sad people are deceived like this
@NoahPoling-p5j3 ай бұрын
@@dirkjensen969oh boy... Not you again smh. your entire arguments against Christianity is " trust me bro, my opinions are facts." Lol
@arcturus47623 ай бұрын
@@dirkjensen969I always liked Dan Brown, but it’s funny how his whole “owning the religious nutcases” bravery falls apart when facing Islam. He literally has a pedo, a slave-owner, a racist, and a mysoginist such as Muhammad, the book making fun of him would literally write itself.
@HMFOG3 ай бұрын
Momo is yet to be found in the Gospel or the Torah. How long will it take ? @@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
@@HMFOG I’ll answer that as soon as you answer where your “Jesus” is found in the Jewish scriptures?
@KardioIzletmetovic3 ай бұрын
Muslims trying not to squeeze everything Muslim into the Bible challenge (impossible)
@ITRNHWithoutThisGlazer3 ай бұрын
Muslims - Squeeze Islam into the Bible (Any%)
@roseandsword.3 ай бұрын
While also claiming it's ,,corrupted"...
@mathewpt44783 ай бұрын
Dont forget they also quote aquinas by saying He approved child marriage @@roseandsword.
@Just_A._Tablespoon3 ай бұрын
@@ITRNHWithoutThisGlazer 0% completion speedrun
@HasanRony-wv3xd3 ай бұрын
See last chapter of true orthodox Bible mention about prophet Muhammad
@bacontheclown25023 ай бұрын
To all Muslims who think Islam isn’t pagan: You assert that a stone miraculously descended from the heavens, and you also contend that it possesses the ability to absolve your transgressions. You venerate it through gestures of licking, prostrating, and circumnavigating it seven times as though it were an arcane ritual. while incorporating the unrelated Arab polytheistic elements it originated from? And are distinct from Abrahamic traditions! You don’t think that sounds pagan?
@OnTheThirdDay3 ай бұрын
Say not 3: Allah, Muhammad, Black Stone.
@Ian-fw2fp3 ай бұрын
they literally claim a bunch of pagan sites and claim "this is for allah"
@AliAbbas-eb9cb3 ай бұрын
@@Ian-fw2fp No, we do not think that is pagan. No one licks it and we do not circumnavigate the stone, we cirlce the house of Allah, which is a copy of the high mosque of heaven here on earth. So please, do not speak ignorantly.
@InitialPC3 ай бұрын
@@AliAbbas-eb9cb all you have to do is look up any video of the stone people even wipe it down to clean it before putting their mouths on it
@Ian-fw2fp3 ай бұрын
@@AliAbbas-eb9cb muhammed knew that the kabba was originally a mithractum (a temple to the pagan god mithras) and he even wrote that in the hadiths, how about you actually read your holy texts and maybe you'd realize how self contradictory and evil they are
@darkwolf77403 ай бұрын
Funnily enough, the Islamic claim is that Muhammed is specifically mentioned in the "Torah and the Gospels", and yet, Muslims, for some strange reason, try to say that Muhammad is in the Song of Solomon? The last time I checked, that isn't a part of the Torah, nor is it a part of the Gospels.
@Apollo1989V3 ай бұрын
They stretch the definition.
@nandinoo3 ай бұрын
They just don't know, they think the Gospels were written in Aramaic and "Injeel" is an Arabic word or something like that.
@Apollo1989V3 ай бұрын
@@nandinoomodern Muslims use the idea that since the Gospels were written in Koine Greek in stead of Aramaic that they aren’t the true gospels, but early Muslims did not hold that idea. You got some Muslims quote, sometimes inaccurately, from the gospels. Although the native tongue of Jesus and the disciples was Aramaic, they likely knew Greek as a second language since it was the lingua franca of the eastern Mediterranean, which is why the gospels were composed in Greek.
@secondchance66033 ай бұрын
Muslims: "Muhammad is mentioned in the bible." Also Muslims: "The Bible is corrupted and can't be trusted!"
@Michael-bk5nz3 ай бұрын
@@Apollo1989V There is a weird Messianic Jewish sect that claims that the gospels were originally written in Hebrew, which by the first century was a dead language understood only by the educated, similar to Latin today, if the gospels had been written in Hebrew no one would be able to understand them
@krkr-d8w3 ай бұрын
Hello there👋 im arab christian ✝️ This comment from egypt 🇪🇬 God be with you ✝️✝️✝️
@Kingo_lloo3 ай бұрын
Me too bro 😂😂
@krkr-d8w3 ай бұрын
@@Kingo_lloo 👋😂😂❤️
@Galahadofthegrail3 ай бұрын
Greetings from a Christian in Turkiye 🇹🇷
@kaanlea91473 ай бұрын
@@Galahadofthegrail bende
@krkr-d8w3 ай бұрын
@@Galahadofthegrail im arab christian✝️✝️✝️ from egypt 🇪🇬👋 Welcome galah 🇹🇷🇹🇷👋😊
@shooterdownunder3 ай бұрын
This same word is also used in Ezekiel to describe his wife and if we were to take this argument into account it would mean that Muhammad is the wife of Ezekiel
@tyrannosauruszeppelin22053 ай бұрын
💀
@nandinoo3 ай бұрын
Spare me the visuals I beg you
@newt40503 ай бұрын
Gayyyy
@HypnoChode743 ай бұрын
@@shooterdownunder so by their own argument of him being in the Bible they confirm he was a troon? Lmaooo stupid heretics
@camillewilliams31853 ай бұрын
😂
@MasterApologetics3 ай бұрын
Muhammad, Police be upon him
@WarriorOfChrist-d3r3 ай бұрын
Amen
@LutzWeissmuller3 ай бұрын
The American military is in Middle East fighting Jihad, because they are searching to arrest mohamed
@ebukaokpara3 ай бұрын
Amen
@Hannie-f4k3 ай бұрын
Peace be upon him 💖
@JoshuahTJ3 ай бұрын
Lol
@Genesis12verse23 ай бұрын
As a native Hebrew speaker Israeli this is hilarious. Muslims already have my blood boiling when they claim prophets like Moshe and David were muslim, but to claim Muhamad appears in our Tanach is absolutely insane. Its also quite funny that they claim he appears in megilat Shir Ha'Shirim, considering what this ketuv is about...
@Eh-Mungu-Nguvu-Yetu-q8p3 ай бұрын
Well that is an Islam thing took all religious figures of jews and Christians and said geuss what boys they were all Muslims from Adam to Jesus.
@OnTheThirdDay3 ай бұрын
They also claim that he is the Holy Spirit in the gospel of John and that he is in Hindu scriptures (you know, pagan scriptures).
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
_”Ask a native Hebrew speaker...”_ Hahaha. There are NO “native Hebrew speakers”. 😂 The entire language you call “Hebrew” was “revived” in the 19th century WITH HELP OF ARABIC by a man named Eliezer Ben Yehuda. As he and his committee admitted, Hebrew was so deficient for modern use that they literally had to steal thousands of roots and phrases from Arabic, including the famous greeting “Shalom Aleichem”, which was ripped off from “Salamu ‘Alaikum”. In other words, the modern “Hebrew” spoken by Israelis is literally artificial - a co-lang highly influenced by Arabic. it cannot by any measure be considered pure biblical Hebrew.
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
A Jew who doesn’t know that “Torah” has a wider range of meaning in Judaism (even encompassing the Oral Torah). Lol. Give me one rabbi who denies that Shir Ha Shirim is considered “Torah”. All of Bani Israil were originally Muslim. Even the rabbis have admitted that Moshe and David were Muslim, both of whom spoke of the coming of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
@@OnTheThirdDay “Holy Spirit” can refer to a prophet. Moses is called the “Holy Spirit” in the “Assumption of Moses”. You know, that apocryphal book quoted by the New Testament. The idea that Muhammad ﷺ is in the Hindu scriptures is not even something that’s required for Muslims to believe. The Quran explicitly tells us that we will find Prophet Muhammad ﷺ’s description in the scriptures of the Jews and Christians (7:157). He is in there, now matter how much you deny it. Genesis 17:20 (alluded to in Quran 2:127-129) is one of the greatest proofs for that.
@maxmccarrick56713 ай бұрын
This argument is a JOKE. When I debated an Islamic person (in English) they showed this and they didn't know I was a native Hebrew speaker and had learned biblical Hebrew in my academic pursuit. So I read him the actual verse in Hebrew and he kicked me out of the speaker corner really fast. goes to show the ignorance of Islam
@OnTheThirdDay3 ай бұрын
It sounds like lying. They know it is ridiculous deep down because they can't defend it at all but express anger when confronted with this truth.
@maxmccarrick56713 ай бұрын
@@OnTheThirdDay What's funny is I read it in Hebrew, then he said "IT'S TRANSLATED BY RABBIS. THEY AREN'T RELIABLE. THEY PUSH THEIR JEWISH AGENDA." I pulled out the Dead Sea Scroll [Online versions] (Refer to Dead Sea Scrolls 4Q106, 4Q107, 4Q108, 6Q6 fragments) and read them from biblical Hebrew. he was shooketh.
@Durv-bruh3 ай бұрын
@@maxmccarrick5671funny how they said rabbis aren’t reliable when the whole Quran was written by Muhammad’s followers to make him seem like a prophet.😂😂
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
I’m very curious. Wheres the “Hebrew” proof that Song of Solomon 5:9-16 is not about Prophet Muhammad ﷺ?
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
@@OnTheThirdDay “Ridiculous” is when your New Testament presents “Jesus” as the fulfillment of Song of Songs (Rev. 3:20, Song. 5:2) without actually giving any proof unlike us Muslims who pulled out Muhammad ﷺ’s name straight from a prophetically relevant passage.
@motendo71283 ай бұрын
Well, actually he is mentioned here: "Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." (Matthew 7:15)
@WangenzzeApologetics3 ай бұрын
Real
@pseudonym15153 ай бұрын
My favorite appearance of Muhammad in the Bible is definitely Ezekiel 24:16 as Ezekiel's wife. Or in Lamentations 2:4 when he died
@legendaryeagleknight3 ай бұрын
Lamentations 2:4 is referring to God's judgement on Jerusalem and Ezekiel 24:16 is talking about God taking away "the desire of thine eyes" which was Ezekiel's wife. Not trying to be rude but I don't see how these verses have anything to do with a prophecy to Muhammad.
@pseudonym15153 ай бұрын
@@legendaryeagleknight That's the joke
@xn85d23 ай бұрын
@@legendaryeagleknight He's talking about uses of the Hebrew word machamaddim that clearly can't mean Muhammad.
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
What do you think about David’s name being used in Song of Solomon 4:10? That would make David the wife of his own son. 🤢
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
@@pseudonym1515 ...and the real joke is on every Christian who ate it up because the New Testament itself claims that Jesus was foretold in the Song of Solomon. Revelation 3:20 is clearly taken from Song of Solomon 5:2 and presents Jesus as the “beloved”. Unlike us, you guys can’t even prove how the Song of Solomon supposedly speaks of Jesus. Where’s does his name appear? Please explain Revelation 3:20 for us.
@anbbbe3 ай бұрын
Muslims: “Muhammad is in the Bible” Yes he is Matthew 7:15
@alanangelo9923Ай бұрын
Also in Deuteronomy 18:20, Revelation 20:10 😂
@gabrielteixeira75643 ай бұрын
Context, the worst enemy of Dawa Bros
@jorgepenaloza68343 ай бұрын
1:55 I think those verses were strategically put there by God playing 44D chess vs muslims from the future.
@slimjim65773 ай бұрын
Almost like our God is real?!?!? 😮 (He is)
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
Well your god didn’t do a good job because the name of his beloved servant David also appears in similar disgraceful contexts in the Bible (like Ezekiel 23:17). Or maybe he did do a good job and was actually trying to say something about David too.
@mcocdiobrando72542 ай бұрын
@@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_AllahI just read the verse and that’s talking about rape NOT David
@ninjainpyjamasguy.81162 ай бұрын
Bro I actually think about this a lot like it’s almost insane to think someone could be so specific because it’s like they knew other people would take the concept and twist it to fit their false narrative
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah2 ай бұрын
@@mcocdiobrando7254 The word “Beloved” in Ezekiel 23:17 is literally David’s name. David means “beloved” in Hebrew.
@inkyfingers34473 ай бұрын
In Hebrew Akbar means mouse so when you say Allah Akbar it means Allah is a 🐭
@SockieTheSockPuppet3 ай бұрын
More accurate to say rat.
@LordePhantom3 ай бұрын
So, God is a Rat?
@SockieTheSockPuppet3 ай бұрын
@LordePhantom Well, Allah. You have to remember that Allah isn't actually the Judeo-Christian God. Though honestly given some of the views and things that Mo believed and did, I actually wouldn't be surprised if he had originally come up with the name to smear God.
@LordePhantom3 ай бұрын
@@SockieTheSockPuppet I've looked into and Mo's God doesn't have a name, Allah simply means God and Christians who live in Islam nations do called Judeo-Christian God as Allah. However, he has 99 titles then names from the Forgiver for the Mercy Bringer but not a single name like Yahweh or Yehoshua
@SockieTheSockPuppet3 ай бұрын
@LordePhantom You know what I meant, the Islamic god is not even remotely God. As to your Yahweh comment, that comes off as disingenuous, since it's pretty obvious the connection between Yahweh and YHWH being the same thing.
@matthewcooper42483 ай бұрын
Oh they don't just say it's close enough to Muhammad. They literally mispronounce it as "Muhammadim."
@kaiser81953 ай бұрын
If they want to validate Mohammed, they should just use the Qur'an. How can they claim that the Bible is corrupted and yet still try to use the same Bible to prove that he is a prophet of God? This reasoning sounds really strange to me.
@SemiOmni3143 ай бұрын
The same way the Jews of Jesus’ time looked to the Tanakh to realize that prophecies were being fulfilled and our messiah came, Mohammad (police be upon him) claims both the Tanakh and the New Testament speaks about him. Granted, the illiterate man has never read either and just says that and says “trust me bro”.
@MeekEarth7003 ай бұрын
@kaiser8195 They are becoming more and more desperate as God's gift of the Internet has made it possible to refute the very beliefs they live by. They need a Saviour; they need Jesus Christ.
@nisonatic2 ай бұрын
They'll essentially say the NT / Tanakh are corrupted, but not entirely, and you can figure out what's valid and what's corrupted based on what's in the Quran. So, it's cherry picking and circular reasoning taken to absurd extremes: start with the presupposition that the Quran is true, then accept or discard any scripture based on whether it fits that presupposition, then declare victory when you find a few scraps of evidence that sound like they support the claim that the Quran is true.
@agncxrx2 ай бұрын
The Quran claims that Muhammad will be found in the Bible. Therefore, those verses of the Bible where Muhammad is mentioned should have been preserved
@fl00m313 ай бұрын
Muslim apologist: "muhammad is in the song of solomon" If that were to happen: "How Beautiful you are my darling! oh my beautiful!" "Didyouknowthatthereisgonnabeanarabprophetthatwillbringbacktheonetruereligionislam?" "i think we need more physicians, is my wife okay?"
@JesusChristlovesyou_friend3 ай бұрын
If that's the case, "allahu akbar" means god is great in Arabic and god is a mouse in hebrew
@HasanRony-wv3xd3 ай бұрын
Allah made all people finger print for judgement day and resurrection purposes
@JamesFancy-my4dq3 ай бұрын
@@HasanRony-wv3xdwhat?
@krazyKenHo3 ай бұрын
@@HasanRony-wv3xd are you struggling with some awful disease call ☪️ancer or ☭️?
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
“Akbar” and “‘akhbar” (mouse) are spelled completely different in Hebrew unlike “Mahamadim” and “Muhammad” and sound as similar as “deep” and “steep”. But nice try.
@Yesbutactuallyno7882 ай бұрын
"Akhbar" and "akbar" sounds more alike than "machamaddim" and Muhammad, and btw we are just copying your logic: you're tasting your own medicine, bruh.
@martapfahl9403 ай бұрын
People who knew biblical prophecy also know that the bible never performs „hidden“ prophecies. The bible is always very precise about which things to happen
@VirtueInEternity3 ай бұрын
Just one minor observation: the sound effects you use are a tad but too loud, it may be a bit difficult for older folks to listen in
@meoqtx3 ай бұрын
hes trying to manipulate children why would it sound good for u ahahah
@1234rizw2 ай бұрын
okay lad BUT MAY I HAVE A BO'EL OF WA'ER MATE
@DefenderOfChrist_2 ай бұрын
Muhammad is mentioned in the Bible in Matthew 7:15-20 “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.
@oyebrocomoestas2 ай бұрын
i didnt know that salomon was transmiting that rizz in the bible before it went popular nowadays, god bless you first time i see one of your videos and you have won a subscriber
@legodavid92603 ай бұрын
If that particular word really means "Mohammed" then that means that Hosea 4:5 says that God will destroy Mohammed. 😂
@xn85d23 ай бұрын
As hilarious as that would be, isn't that a different word (’im-me-ḵā)?
@legodavid92603 ай бұрын
@@xn85d2Maybe I misread it, but "im-me-ka" still kind of sounds like "Mecca" so if we apply Muslim standards that passage would mean that God will destroy Mecca! 😅
@xn85d23 ай бұрын
@@legodavid9260 Ah, got it! 😂
@davyd94443 ай бұрын
Love your content man
@kennethj11903 ай бұрын
Muslims believe Alexander the Great was Muslim but he was Gay so.....😂😂😂😂
@Pioneer_DE3 ай бұрын
Alexander the Great was gay?
@Marv07123 ай бұрын
and that he is directionally challenged. according to the quran he travelled the opposite way lol
@paulandreig.sahagun343 ай бұрын
He really is a Muslim...also a self-proclaimed god himself.
@bacontheclown25023 ай бұрын
He was a pagan!!!
@mathewpt44783 ай бұрын
@@bacontheclown2502 still he was based Tho Imagine Alexander was In the 7th or 12th century absolute cinema The muzzis wouldn't have touched Europe or spain
@ihaveatonofnames3 ай бұрын
Muslim apologists logic is that equal to a goose
@DoctorWhyDesigns3 ай бұрын
That's insulying! Geese are have much more logic than Muslim apologists!
@Durv-bruh3 ай бұрын
Hey! Don’t insult the geese they have Liek a trillion times the logic of a Muslim apologist.
@nasseral-assi99612 ай бұрын
How insultful a person with this kind of pfp open thier mouth
@TheWaffleManiac073 ай бұрын
The guy in the thumbnail looks like sambucha
@Axels_Universe3 ай бұрын
Okay how do you do something that messed up. This is crazy. Glorry be to Christ!
@dancheah18253 ай бұрын
There is one scenario where Muhammad is mentioned in the gospel of luke in luke 8:30- when Jesus asked what is thy name. And he said, "legion"
@akash200523 ай бұрын
No sheikh uthman & adnan rashid was hurt in this video 😂💀
@Apollo1989V3 ай бұрын
Muslims need to remember if the word translated as desirable means Muhammad because it can sound like his name, Mo is the homosexual spouse of Ezekiel and Allah is a mouse.
@cenpire3 ай бұрын
Hey there Testify, I am a new Christian since Last year, ever since birth i was a Catholic and went to a Private catholic school from Kindergarten to 7th grade but even then up until my Sr year of Highschool i didnt even care about religion at all, I just knew what it was. Since I became a Christian, I had some Questions about Christianity that I have a hard time finding about online or someone that could help me answer. I was wondering if you could help me understand the reliability of the Gospels because I have gotten into a discussion with an Atheist and he was telling me about how the Gospel writers have just copied each other and how theres whole strings of lines in the synoptic gospels that are word for word the same, I just wanted to see if theres a way to explain this and how it affects our view on their accounts. God bless
@LutzWeissmuller3 ай бұрын
Writers from Pre-Christian era said in 3rd and 2nd century that as a popular known fact of that time and place, Apostolic Churches where founded because the apostols where reciting publicly the story of Jesus in Rome, Carthage, India, Athenas, etc and was by the popularity that they gain that they started to recite it to writers, i dont know if that helps, but is the best i can do
@cenpire3 ай бұрын
@@LutzWeissmuller Bro i actually thank you for this responce, you gave me more of a foundation on what I should study on when it comes to Christianity and the history of it, thank you
@GaretAlan503 ай бұрын
the “Synoptic problem” so to speak confirms that 90% of Mark is in Matthew and 50% of Mark is in Luke. Of Mark’s 665 verses, 600 are in Matthew and Luke, leaving 65 verses that are unique to only Mark. This confirms that “6% of Matthew and Luke is read against Mark.” This proves that Mark provided the majority of the source for both Matthew and Luke. One thing to keep in mind is oral form of communication was “highly reliable” and largely memorized during that time period time. This accounts for the similarities of the Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. The writing style of biblical times was much different than it is today; however, oral form can account for the similarities in the Synoptic Gospels, but not the differences. There are different theories about this, including how the order should be. Some say this order gives a clue as to what was copied and what was not. Literary interdependence reference works talks about the Augustinian hypothesis which puts the order at Matthew, Mark, then Luke. The Augustinian hypothesis does not rely on textual criticism, but rather historical testimony. A modified theory of Augustinian hypothesis is the Griesbach hypothesis that holds the order to be Matthew, Luke, then Mark, with Mark being dependent on both Matthew and Luke. The most modern and widely-accepted theory is the Two-source theory, which states that Mark was used as a source for Matthew and Luke independently of each other, and that the remaining 230 verses that Matthew and Luke share came from a source labeled as “Q.” “Q” could be a source from oral tradition, as previously mentioned, but theologians are in dispute as to the accuracy of the Q theory. There is biblical support for the Two-source hypothesis order of Mark, Matthew, and Luke. Personally, however, I always viewed them from the majority of similarities and unification perspectives rather than from their differences vs what was alleged to be copied and what wasn’t. It’s important to remember the overall message is the same, and it is nonetheless God-inspired. These theories also must be viewed from a matter of perspective. Even if Mark was the first Gospel, Matthew and Luke made independent contributions (of the verses not similar) that were also divinely inspired. Nevertheless, this supports a very strong argument for oral form and its reliability in maintaining the divinely inspired Word of God for all three gospels that we still have today.
@cenpire3 ай бұрын
@@GaretAlan50 Thank you for writing this for me bro, you couldnt understand how much i appreciate the help. These different theories are definitely somethings i need to study countless of times. As a christian, personally the most important things to me is the reliability of the Texts and im glad theres some explanations for these out there
@GaretAlan503 ай бұрын
@@cenpireno worries man, I actually wasn’t the original writer, I had the same question a while back and researched it If you have more questions check my description
@Christ-my-king3 ай бұрын
Islam is that one dude who put his name on everyone else’s work lmao
@martytu203 ай бұрын
“But if we or an angel from heaven comes to you with a gospel contrary to what we have preached, let him be accursed!” Galatians 1:8 Muhammad is in the Bible. Alhumdulillah!!!!!
@ukog60482 ай бұрын
Let him be cursed👀
@FriedChicken-u1xАй бұрын
I know right? He's also in Matthew 7:15!
@kapitankapital65803 ай бұрын
It might be plausible if the verse had anything to do with him. But yeah, just picking a word that sounds vaguely similar to Muhammad without any regard for context is not a strong argument.
@PrimitiveChristian-m3p3 ай бұрын
She sat down under a tree with Muhammed then the tree burned down! 🤣
@danielcooke99742 ай бұрын
Muslims want people to refer to Muhammad in a certain way but don't respect how others would have other people respected, we don't have to venerate your religion
@tymon19283 ай бұрын
Diddy deen police be upon him is indeed the only person we should listen when it comes to the eisegesis of the Bible
@mathewpt44783 ай бұрын
He is soo obsessed I swear look at his videos everything is on Testify and sam
@jeterank98473 ай бұрын
Congrats on 104k! 👏 🎉
@bestkrystal13493 ай бұрын
Questions for alll the Muslims, if the Bible were to be corrupted and if they removed Muhammed or the Kabaa from the bible, why would they have the need to remove them from the bible if the bible came before Islam even existed? 😂
@Afterburn73 ай бұрын
Could we see a video about nonstampcollectors contradictions within the bible pop quiz video?
@Anugreh9713 ай бұрын
Um I have a request So can you make a video on the Ascension of Christ and about if it is literal or not? And if you have already made a video on it please send me the link Thanks
@TestifyApologetics3 ай бұрын
I did several years ago kzbin.info/www/bejne/b17dg5muatl6Y8Usi=on5muTVixgNLqri1
@Anugreh9713 ай бұрын
@@TestifyApologetics Thanks sir
@Howiswen3 ай бұрын
Babe wake up Testify uploaded new video.
@jacksonguillory81142 ай бұрын
Honestly i find the depiction of Muhammed as a Coomerjak incredibly funny. Good video though.
@Lilgoofyball-r3 ай бұрын
Wait, let me get this straight: People say Muhammad is in the Bible because of a word in Hebrew meaning “desirable or precious” in the plural form sounds like Muhammad. With that logic, the Mandarin word 那個 which means “that” sounds close enough to a certain word in English.
@kingkoldzens3 ай бұрын
Can you explain the young rich man where people claim jesus is not divine. I struggle with this verse
@TestifyApologetics3 ай бұрын
I did kzbin.info/www/bejne/mJ-xfIKDpb2abrc
@kingkoldzens3 ай бұрын
@@TestifyApologetics THANK YOU BROTHER!
@LukeClemens2 ай бұрын
So in summary... 1 Kings 20:5-6 - The king of Syria promised to confiscate mhmd from the Israelites in 850 BC. 2 Chronicles 36:19 - Babylon destroyed and burned mhmd in fire in 550 BC. Isaiah 64:11 - Mhmd was burned with fire and laid to waste at around 600 BC. Lamentations 1:10 - Israel's enemies spread their hands over mhmd. Ezekiel 24:16 - mhmd was Ezekiel's wife in 600 BC. Hosea 9:16 - God promised to slay mhmd's children.
@MadGamer133713 күн бұрын
This is the best summary I stumbled upon. And hilarious on the muslims' mindset when they claim the 2 words sound the same "therefore they mean the same thing".
@LionOf.Christ3 ай бұрын
Police be upon on him false prophet
@markk77312 ай бұрын
Why would a Muslim point out Mo Mo was in the Torah and the Gospel if it's corrupted!? Asking for a 6th century Prophet who culturally appropriated passages he heard from the Jewish Torah and Christain Gospels. That same 6th century prophet affirmed the torah and gospels without reading them because, Mo Mo never learned to read.
@power2793 ай бұрын
Song of solomon was a song about solomon and his bride..grow up abdools
@Kimi63463 ай бұрын
@@power279 yeah mohammad is Solomon's bride, he's gay😂😂😂
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
@@power279 Your New Testament disagrees with you (Revelation 3:20, Song of Solomon 5:2).
@bradalanmusic8082 ай бұрын
@Eesa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah the only time mohammad is talked about in the bible is when Jesus says beware of false prophets that come after. Luke 16:16 Jesus says the time of prophets ends with John the Baptizer
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah2 ай бұрын
@@bradalanmusic808 So I guess John the Elder and Paul are false prophets as well since they come after John the Baptist. Nice dunk on your own religion.
@broshutup-ku5bz2 ай бұрын
@@Kimi6346 ayooo💀💀🙏
@mathewpt44783 ай бұрын
What will deen say now He is obsessed with you soo Much now His entire videos are now on you 😂
@darkwolf77403 ай бұрын
Man's fallen in love 😳
@Therandomdisciple3 ай бұрын
Deen’s new bride 👰
@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns3 ай бұрын
Jesus is the son, which sounds the same as the sun, so Jesus is the sun god. Checkmate.
@ItsCrimsonwolf2 ай бұрын
At 1:38 what website are you using to get the translated words from Hebrew to English?
@clone3_72 ай бұрын
I think it was: Bible Hub
@Fugitive6853 ай бұрын
Why are all the comments hidden?
@Chance_Rice3 ай бұрын
There not
@KardioIzletmetovic3 ай бұрын
Gee I wonder why 🤔 It's not him deleting muslim comments, the muslims must be cursing him so much that youtube deletes them
@darkwolf77403 ай бұрын
KZbin is buggy
@samuelgallo1826Ай бұрын
I tell people this: Yeah, you can find Muhammad in the Bible. He is mentioned as False Prophet.
@Dinobs80893 ай бұрын
Bro getting exposed everyday by deen and refused to debate him even deen challenged him😂😂
@bestkrystal13493 ай бұрын
Ok dinobs
@Donnnel2 ай бұрын
exposed is a strong word, i bet he doesnt even know him
@Dinobs80892 ай бұрын
@@Donnnel no he even tagged him to debate him but he doesn’t responded
@Dinobs80892 ай бұрын
@@Donnnel u can search "deen responds” he is just like 20 yr and scared to debate him??
@timd38953 ай бұрын
Is this the same Song of Solomon that Muslims say is pcorn but they also say Mohamad is in there? 🥸
@broshutup-ku5bz2 ай бұрын
PCorn... Do they not know that Mohammad was pedo?..
@awxhofficial3 ай бұрын
Hello there
@amethystlove41243 ай бұрын
You people of Testify comments section I NEED YOUR HELP!!! Ive been waiting for a testify vid or post to ask this. IM TRYING TO FIND A VERSE I READ IN THE BIBLE THAT I LOST THAT SAYS THAT WHEN YOU RESIST TEMPTATION, THE WILL OF GOD WILL BE DONE Does anyone know or have an idea which verse this is???
@williamrice30523 ай бұрын
@amethystlove4124 Not sure but James 4:7 says Submit to God, resist the devil and he will flee from you
@terrfomp923 ай бұрын
Don’t forget that the Torah and Gospels have been corrupted, so it’s a losing battle anyway.
@Marv07123 ай бұрын
Well, it's a "Womp womp" argument in my book, because either the Gospels and torah have been corrupted, therefore allahs words are corruptable and changable (according to the quran, Torah and "Inil" aka gospels are revelations from Allah), which contradicts the quran, or they are indeed true, which contradict the quran
@paulandreig.sahagun343 ай бұрын
Where does in any Hadiths and Quran says that the Gospels and Torah are both corrupted?
@tnmblonewolf87993 ай бұрын
@@paulandreig.sahagun34None, most the Quran says is that there were people who wrote fake books and said they were from God and said false things and said it was also from God
@jameswithjesuschrist17283 ай бұрын
@@tnmblonewolf8799 that would be the Quran , wouldn't it?
@Eaglealbert423 ай бұрын
Islam needs the torah and Bible to have been corrupted in order for it to be true - but they aren't. scholars have studied the bible extensively, both secular and Christian scholars, and we have preserved bibles in its original greek and hebrew to compare it too, plus various other early texts such as the dead sea scrolls. Even Atheist's in the west who study ancient texts admit that the bible is historically consistent - that alone proves Islam is false, sense Islam claims that Mohammad was needed to be a prophet because of this alleged "corruption".
@kvelezАй бұрын
1:31 Following the argument.
@poksu183 ай бұрын
Islam is Done :D:D:D
@crazyand20992 ай бұрын
Surprised you didn't mention machmadeem being used to describe Ezekiel's wife.
@DivineJustice-xl1jw3 ай бұрын
First, please pin 📌
@BellowDGaming3 ай бұрын
Paul first met with Peter at Jerusalem three years after his conversion to Jesus Christ. Muhammad's Islam is over 500years. Who do you believe? A man that met the apostles of Christ after a few years or something hundreds of years later from another region?
@Simon-19653 ай бұрын
Next we will be told by one of momo's followers that he's found momo in Isaiah 72!
@bradalanmusic8082 ай бұрын
Luke 16:16 jesus says the time of prophets ends with John the Baptizer
@shananakinpiewalker23363 ай бұрын
Can you look at genetically modified skeptics video on the arguments for god tier list
@WonderWoman0002 ай бұрын
Great stuff mate!!
@hammy_and_britney3 ай бұрын
The sound effects im dying 😂😂
@TotallyNotARebel_5502 ай бұрын
Its kind of funny how youtube videos roasting Mohammad just keeps popping out this week like shouldn't we have addressed the situation way before? Or is it just my recommendations Edit: yup, its my recommendations being late. Didn't know the video where you talk about Mohammad being a fraud was 1 month ago
@Thepotatoguy123 ай бұрын
PLS MAKE A VIDEO ON WILLIAM CAMPBELL VS ZAKIR NAIK, PLS
@bryansmulez46723 ай бұрын
✝ JESUS FROM HEAVEN • PROPHET MOH FROM THE DESERT ✝ JESUS IN HEAVEN • PROPHET MOH IN THE GROUND ⚰️
@chimpanzinc17903 ай бұрын
issue also is, the songs of Solomon isn't even holy scripture its just a collection of love letters.
@abelzek75093 ай бұрын
Bro can u answer the claim of those deen response cuz john 16 12 13 he qoute while john 16 14 and 15 will be done for him
@MarcRe883 ай бұрын
That momo is in the Song of Solomon is so ridiculous, only a muslim could belive that
@Chinmookchin3 ай бұрын
Idk how he got so many followers in his time, yeah I know he is known for his honesty, but c'mon
@theultimatetank21793 ай бұрын
Yo testify! Can you explain the flood in your next video and reconcile it a little bit with science will appreciate it if you do that because it will boost my faith.
@LutzWeissmuller3 ай бұрын
If you are a faithfull Christian you need to know that modern science contradicts Bible specially in history, so or you believe blindly that modern academics who change the conclusions to favor the propaganda to people who puts the money on his searchings, and who control what you watch and what no, and promote degeneracy that doesnt even make conform with his lifes to degenerates, or you can believe blindly the Bible, wich his perfect morality will help you, and that is translated in a past with strong man, with a strong society.
@LutzWeissmuller3 ай бұрын
In first place the flood appears in lot of different cultures, with notable similiraties, from the Gilgamesh story passing through Indian and Greek version, to Yu the Great in China, all are dated to born in a same time, all are dated arround 2000 BC, with similarities that can be explained by the fact that all nations are created by Noahs grandsons and greatgrandsons, but unexpleiable similarities from an skeptic point of view, in the Gilgamesh revisionism we can see how before Gilgamesh, all the recors of Sumerian Kings lived lot of centuries like preflood people, and exact in Gilgamesh the number changes, like happens with Noah.
@ХристоМартунковграфЛозенски3 ай бұрын
I can't fathom how after all these years Christian apologists have been thoroughly dismantling this stupid argument the dawahgandists *still* insist on using it.
@HydraHolden3 ай бұрын
The Quaran is like a doujinshi. If you don’t know what that is, forget what I said, sweet summer child.😐
@lifenegotiator27003 ай бұрын
Uhhh spoiler alert.... They still use this verse to this day. In the bright side. It gets funnier every time
@maplebob233 ай бұрын
So is Mohamed the apple that hit Newton on the head before he discovered figs?
@Kris12qw3 ай бұрын
Man, your animations are fire
@marcin48043 ай бұрын
Genesis 16:7-15 There is an actual prohecy in the Bible about the Arabs.
@GaretAlan503 ай бұрын
So? Prophesying an entire nation does not have any connection to one man
@RichtofenE1153 ай бұрын
Me: Ah the Song of Solomon, a book detailing the importance of marital love in devotion to God told in the form of a beautiful poem Idiots: The woman in the story is clearly talking about Mohammad
@hersh34453 ай бұрын
Mark 1:7 “After me comes the one more powerful than I, the straps of whose sandals I am not worthy to stoop down and untie. Its claimed that this verse was referring to John the Baptist, but he came before Jesus (A.S). While Prophet Muhammed (S.A.W) came after Jesus (A.S).
@GaretAlan503 ай бұрын
Brother, stop the silliness. John the Baptist *IS THE ONE SPEAKING* and he’s speaking *ABOUT JESUS* because right after this *JESUS APPEARED*
@Jupiter314153 ай бұрын
Now John was clothed with camel’s hair and with a leather belt around his waist, and he ate locusts and wild honey. And he preached, saying, “There comes One after me who is mightier than I, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to stoop down and loose. I indeed baptized you with water, but He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.” Mark 1:6-8 It says right here it’s John the Baptist speaking. In the same passage you quoted
@hersh34453 ай бұрын
@@GaretAlan50 Salam, you were right about it being spoken from John the Baptist and not Jesus (A.S) which I’m sorry about, but there are verse still in the bible that mention him in Isaiah. Isaiah 42:1 “My servant, whom I uphold, my chosen one in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit on him, and he will bring justice to the nations.” 3 of the names of the prophet Muhammed (S.A.W) were said in this verse which those names were Abd-Allah (God’s Servant), Mustafa (The Chosen), and Habib-Allah (Beloved of God) They also give the location of him in Isaiah 42:10-11 “10 Sing unto the Lord a new song, and his praise from the end of the earth, ye that go down to the sea, and all that is therein; the isles, and the inhabitants thereof. 11 Let the wilderness and the cities thereof lift up their voice, the villages that Kedar doth inhabit: let the people of Sela sing, let them shout from the top of the mountains.” Kedar’s location at verse 11 is highlighted as a sign of where he is at. Book of Ezekiel: “Arabia and all the princes of Kedar were your favored dealers in lambs, rams, and goats; in these they did business with you.” Muhammed (S.A.W) being said to be with kedar and in the book of ezekiel Kedar was said to be in Arabia, which was Muhammed’s (S.A.W) home country. In Isaiah 42:11 “let the people of Sela sing, let them shout from the top of the mountains.” Sela is located at Medina, which is also where the Prophet Muhammed (S.A.W) was at. In Isaiah 42, there is more clues to it referring to the prophet Muhammed (S.A.W), but it would take way to long to put all in a comment section, so instead I recommend watching EFDawah’s video about the prophet Muhammed (S.A.W) being in Isaiah 42.
@briandiehl92573 ай бұрын
@@hersh3445selah is not Medina lol
@hersh34453 ай бұрын
@@briandiehl9257 its a mountain in medina.
@Goober5432 ай бұрын
why do you change your title every day on the vid
@freddurstedgebono60293 ай бұрын
Idk why they want Muhammad to be mentioned in what is basically an erotic novel
@admanassas18532 ай бұрын
Wow, you did not just put crazy eyes on their Quran...
@HarisPant-i3h3 ай бұрын
Will you respond to deen responds he made two videos about you
@GaretAlan503 ай бұрын
Deen has horrible responses lol
@King_Miracle3 ай бұрын
Bro and rizz 🤣
@maxalaintwo35783 ай бұрын
YOU SEEEEEE
@krazyKenHo3 ай бұрын
I do believe that than the folse prophet Muhammad r.i.p and be in hell appears in the bible as soonest you said it is burning in hell.
@BryanBenavides-b4g3 ай бұрын
By that logic, the Hebrew word for mouse is "Akhbar". So if I say "Allahu Akbar" does that mean that GOD is a mouse? NOPE!
@ZachTheNabiNZ72 ай бұрын
Come on guys, we clearly know that Muhammad is mentioned in the Bible. Don't believe me? Well, open Galatians 1:8.
@kardew9733 ай бұрын
Allah calls to die for him, but Christ calls to live for him ! Allah wants submission from all, but Christ offers his love to all ! Allah says he is the best deceiver, but Christ proclaims he is the Truth ! Allah curses those who dont believe him, but Christ wants to save all !
@Therandomdisciple3 ай бұрын
@@tyrant2344Satan doesn’t either So checkmate
@ImTitan163 ай бұрын
You forgot how Muslims claim muhhamd is the prophet like Mosses in Det 18:18
@TestifyApologetics3 ай бұрын
I'll address that one soonish
@darkwolf77403 ай бұрын
That's gotta be the silliest claim I've heard. A "Prophet like Moses" who has neither seen God face-to-face nor was he an Israelite.
@Marv07123 ай бұрын
Oh, easy. They claim that "Ishmaelites" also were in the arabic regions, yet fail to read that it clearly says "Israelite". Israelites were never even close to the arabic region where muhammad was.
@colinblackie96543 ай бұрын
@@Marv0712the entire context of Deuteronomy proves that it’s not talking about Muhammad, but I’ve tried to explain that to a true believer and nope, if you are talking to a Muslim here in the comments you are not talking to one interested in seeking truth but one seeking to justify his position no matter what
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah3 ай бұрын
@@TestifyApologetics Can’t wait for the embarrassing blunders.
@Harith-le5iq3 ай бұрын
I actually encourage them to keep going because once people realizing they make things up and lie for the sake of allah they’ll leave in droves