Back To Bigger | Cadillac's CT5

For 2020 and 2021 Cadillac has decided to re-align the pricing on their sedan lineup, but not their size. The ATS-sized CT4 is now the compact-sized sub-compact competitor, and the CTS-sized CT5 is the mid-sized compact segment competitor. Got it? No? Don't worry, all you need to know is that the CT4 is the less expensive one and the CT5 is what Cadillac calls a 3-series competitor. But is it? And do you want it? Let's find out.
Join Today: bit.ly/2WdCEwW
Our Other Channel: The Mountain Garden: goo.gl/icFWcd
Follow AoA on Facebook: theautobu...

[@mjhowson2389]

I may be in the minority, but I like Cadillac's new torque-naming approach. As they add hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and pure BEV, consumers can easily see the power difference between the models. There was a time when a BMW 325 meant the car had a 2.5L engine. A BMW 328 had a 2.8L engine. Now, a BMW 330 comes with a 2.0L as standard. BMW and Mercedes model names mean nothing anymore. Cadillac is basically splitting the car name in half. They have the actual model name, and then show its power level with the torque badge. Works for me. Although most buyers may not know what the torque number means, at least it means something, unlike on the BMW.

[@g1981c]

people just need something to whine about. there was a time when computer CPUs were named by clock frequency and car models by engine displacement. those days are gone. going by torque makes a lot of sense for non-sport models. sport models should go by HP.

[@bigcjm]

@@g1981c I agree. Frankly no one really cares in the end.

[@jimmehp2748]

Good point!

[@MarkRVillano]

I think that a prime consideration when choosing any of these vehicles is your proximity to a mechanic that can work on your particular make and model. This would be especially true with something like the Volvo S-60 T8, with a turbo charger, a super charger, electric motors, an air suspension, and enough electronic nannies to run a daycare center.

[@bikingmoments]

Mark Villano a 10yr factory warranty is the best way to go🤣

[@illinoistiger8694]

This car is one of my favorites for 2020. With the 3.0L TT, it's a modern day Infiniti G35 - which was one of my favorite vehicles from the early 2000's. As usual, Alex does a brilliant job reviewing it.

[@chiluco2000]

Barring classic GM quality issues I think the CT5 is my top choice. Also, I'm wondering how well those snazzy big LCD instrument clusters will age compared to traditional analog gauges. It would really suck to have some dead pixels or some random flickering staring you in the face every day!

[@coxgaspoweredtether]

I have this car and it is awesome! twin turbo v six 10 speed all wheel drive. Loaded up nicely!

[@sopwithsnoopy8779]

I wish Cadillac would bring back the CT6 😢 Not that I can afford one, even used...

[@gb2828]

I have a CT6, and agree with you complete, and it looks like I'll be holding on to it for good, long while. This CT5, despite a lower price, in "underwhelming," to say the least !!

[@LamontBoucherville]

@@gb2828 smart buy. The Ct6. Looks way better than CT5

[@imnotusingmyrealname4566]

What's so bad about real gauges? The full LCDs are bad quality screens with awful design like mirrored tachometers and speedometers that skip numbers. Today real gauges are snazzy.

[@charlieg.6242]

Love the new intro, classy.

[@Classical.Conservative]

Very nice design. Everything made by GM has amazing design

[@trent7080]

Agree

[@yes8032]

💯 % agree

[@stuartlee6622]

I am going to buy a CT 5 when I soon move from awful New York City to Aventura, Florida. I hope to get red leather upholstery. And perhaps black exterior.

[@FantomLightning]

GM really said "let's do what we know best, big and cheap!" And ran with that... I wonder if it'll pay off for them like it has with VW.

[@markmiller3279]

The only VW that is selling well is the Tiguan, and it's in a class of vehicle where even some crummy entries sell well. Other than that, Volkwagens bigger-and-cheaper strategy for selling models designed for Americans has not been a success.

[@Whatitup]

@@markmiller3279 The Jetta and Atlas both sell very well.

[@vernonpaigejr.1517]

When my CTS dies, I'll get one of these.

[@martinmartin5904]

About the rear 3/4 window & its arrow chrome trim : it looks like a mixture of ''Infinity''' and chevy Cruze . Not a very happy mix , almost Cimarron-esque in the sense that they want it to look premium .

[@GoofieNewfie]

I don't know how you do your 0-60 times but they are very optimistic. Even the CT5-V is ~4.6-4.8 and you got the smaller engine doing 4.6. Same issue with your TLX review, 5.7? others are over 6.

[@joedidit3233]

Most likely the 335 hp v6 has been under-rated as to not compete with the V model. I would suspect the true horsepower is much closer to the 360 hp in the V than they are stating.

[@joedidit3233]

The 550T version of the 3.0 twin turbo does 0-60 in 4.9 seconds with rear wheel drive, and a bit slower at 5.1 seconds with all wheel drive. 4.9 isn't much slower than the 4.6 seconds of the V model. Both would normally beat a stock Dodge Charger R/T or Dodge Challenger R/T with the 5.7 Hemi. Too bad Cadillac doesn't capitalize on that in commercials.

[@lazziebardakos2956]

I wish they were available in Australia. I'd opt for that over any European equivalent.

[@user-cx2bk6pm2f]

The 550T badge is indeed silly, like stupid silly, like falling down drunk stupid silly. Smh.

[@Mercer1012]

The interiors of Genesis blow this away.

[@paulbugoni2846]

Technically this Is a mid engine car...good value.

[@Justkevin377]

Even though the MKZ is going away you should’ve put it in your comparison list

[@girlperson1]

Do they still blow head gaskets? My 1992 Seville fell apart quickly. It too had “magnetic ride control” which also failed quickly. Beautiful cars but really unreliable.

[@sopwithsnoopy8779]

Blowing head gaskets was typical of the Northstar engines. Cadillac hasn't used the Northstar engines since 2011. They solved the head gasket issues on the 2004+ years, I believe.

[@sjs6555]

ct5 best beautiful car~~~~

[@gregholman2930]

I would like to see Cadillac introduce a super lux vehicle that competed with Lexus, Audi, BMW....I avoided adding MBZ in that group bc that would be impossible!...CHEERS!

[@clarencepowell1278]

Nice

[@InvestBetter.]

The compact midsize Caddy

[@M1911jln]

The fact that supercruise is not available on the CT5 is inexplicable. I don't like that fake window behind the rear doors or the Bangle Butt trunk. Volvo S60? Heck no. Volvo's reliability sucks and I don't care for front-wheel-drive dynamics.

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

It is for 2021

[@unjaded2]

ct5 is sweet as a V 6 cyl and the Blackwing V will be awesome and the one to buy . ct4 is garbage and should be called a Buick Verano 2.0 . ct4 is nothing like the ATS at all

[@1_Papa]

I find this car to be both ugly and embarrassing for the division at the same time. And I think you hit the nail on the head when you described the front end in the beginning: No wreath, no ducks; nothing to link this car with any traditional Cadillac. That's the damned problem. I see a 2011-2015 Chevrolet Cruze on steroids when I look at it. It's too big for its competitors and too small on the inside to compete with cars as large on the outside. And turbos can and will break over time, so no thank you! I hope when all-electric power takes over, that Cadillac will forget trying to be all things to BMW and Mercedes-Benz owners and get back to being Cadillac! Good review as usual, Alex and crew, but to this car and Cadillacs in general (except the Escalade), I say "Ewww, disgusting, go away!" And don't come back until you build an actual Cadillac! 🗑! 🐰

[@robertrodriguez8167]

How does it compare to the Buick GS with awd and I think turbocharged?

[@Heatherder]

I have the older ‘12 GS with a manual. I love the car, but the cadillac is way nicer built interior and also faster overall.

[@JohnDangcilGeekWere]

Aw, no ducks! 🦆

[@AntonyWilliams]

At 0:52 I think you mean Jaguar XE

[@jimmacmurdo355]

Were I buying a compact luxury sedan, I'd probably get the G70 or possibly the S60. Both have nicer interiors than the CT5.

[@stone69651]

All the problems Volvo is having with the t8 power plant no thanks

[@GaryBoyd02]

That badging rationale is completely laughable. What group of executives sat around with their masks on to tight and a lack of oxygen???

[@Heatherder]

Its for the coming electric, hybrid and diesel versions

[@Jaymac720]

The badge is so dumb. Just go with power or torque in US units to the nearest multiple of 5. Or don’t use alphanumeric designations in such a simple lineup 🤷‍♂️

[@Heatherder]

They should stick with names like GMs other brands I agree. However it makes sense because electric diesel and hybrid options coming to the forefront.

[@mykeonthemove]

I’d get the Cadillac over the volvo

[@kevintrigg1328]

The CT5 looks like a slightly glorified Chevy Malibu, especially inside.

[@patcurrie9888]

Baseball glove, nope, pumpkin orange, gross! No thanks.

[@mkadair]

I do not like the chopped rear end look on this car.

[@markmiller3279]

It looks weirdly reminiscent of the old Saturn Ion, just larger.

[@samsciascia4004]

It looks like a Honda, not a Cadillac. I wouldn't buy it.

[@user-cx2bk6pm2f]

Hmm. Feels like Caddy is targeting and pricing for millennials. Smart move. Harley Davidson should be taking notes.

[@joedidit3233]

For sure. If you've ever sat in a new CT5, you'll know that getting in and out of it is not easy for senior citizens, the former target group. They've abandoned all the sumptuous, plush interiors of yesterday, and are going more for the stark, plain colorless interiors similar to BMW's. Getting in and out of the drivers seat is a chore compared to Cadillacs of yesterday.

[@SwannBus]

Cadillac has no clue what they’re doing. Throwing anything to the wall to see if it sticks. IMO, Journalist ruined Cadillac. They started chasing the germans, instead of building luxury cars with impeccable build quality. Cadillac has never caught on being a “German Rival”. Had the CT6 (great chassis) been offered with a V8 from conception, it would have been more successful. Cadillac is a one-car company with the Escalade doing the heavy lifting. They had built beautiful, compelling concepts in the pasts but failed to bring any to market. They’re totally lost as a brand.

[@kens97sto171]

Absolutely correct, even worse they started chasing the Germans with the CTS V. Did a good job of doing that at the time and then basically just stopped. I understand them moving away from the luxury car market because quite frankly there aren't that many old people left to buy luxury Cadillacs that float down the road. But then like this vehicle and many other sedans, you can't even fit anybody in the back seat if they're somewhat tall what is the point of having great rear legroom if you have to Crane your neck to sit in the back seat and then they wonder why nobody is buying sedans anymore. It's because too many sedans today don't have usable back seats. It's fine if you want to make the roofline look like it's a coupe but that design concept should not impact functionality to the degree that it seems to in many new cars.

[@letlive8014]

Would suggest that any luxury auto-maker compromise the style to give proper head room! Also the side window strikes me as a bit odd. Most important, imitate Lexus in RELIABILITY! All new doesn't equate with solid reliability, a.k.a. longevity. Just my thoughts conveyed!

[@bikingmoments]

I like this CT5 over the new TLX a lot.

[@christianx2k]

same now that the tlx is out, the ct5 is still the better option

[@Sleepyboiwonder]

Can’t wait to try both soon!

[@GoofieNewfie]

I agree with you actually. The CT5-V is very compelling car and waited 2 years for the TLX. I'm still waiting for the Type S before I buy but I already know I don't like the interior and lack of features in it. Never thought I'd even consider an american car.

[@bikingmoments]

MegaIdiotJerk Any car that breaks down after 2 years is covered under warranty. You can lease one if not feel confident. The new TLX is rather disappointing for compromising on a few key advantages.

[@bikingmoments]

Steve Yeah it’s rather disappointing that new TLX focuses too much on dynamics yet compromising on interior room, weight, fuel economy etc.

[@tomridesbikesPNW]

Alex, I love your reviews, don't ever change your layout. The amount of time you invest in thoroughly testing vehicles, and your completeness is why when shopping for a car, I always come to your videos. A+ rating on your videos!!

[@rizzlerazzleuno4733]

4 door large sedan without decent rear seat head room and small trunk.....no thanks........But it is good looking. Another car where function loses to out to form.

[@ShowMeWhatINeedToKnow]

I'm kind of thinking this might be a good alternative to a 5 series.

[@kristians2704]

until you compare their interiors

[@jdm1039]

@@kristians2704 The transaction price difference will more than make up for any interior shortcomings. The base price of a 5 series is $54k. The Cadillac CT5 base price is $37k. I'd rather pay $17k less for an interior that is 85-90% the equivalent. You are not getting a $17,000 better interior. Not even close.

[@WesLey-yv8vi]

I think I'd have to get CT5 over the Volvo to buy american and the eminence of the Cadillac brand...

[@rightlanehog3151]

Alex, You keep using the phrase - unless you've been living in a cave. What do you have against cave dwellers anyway?

[@cavemankiwi]

Yeah I am quite upset. I even have wifi in my cave.

[@baldboi504]

Lol

[@eddstarr2185]

Sorry Alex, I'm very concerned that Cadillac is chasing "affordable luxury" and it shows by the CT5, following the loss of the CT6. Once Cadillac loses its luxury crown it will be a very rough road trying to get it back later. American luxury can be sooo much more than bus-sized SUVs!

[@TheSpectre2300]

Other than the fuel economy, I can't think of much to dislike about this car. If I were to go for one, I think I'd get it with the 3.0 liter engine.

[@markmiller3279]

The limited rear headroom and small trunk are not minor matters, either.

[@jaffarbaqi]

Once you sit in German rival, the interior of this Cadillac will look two classes down. And that's my only gripe with the CT5.

[@CoolGuy-ux5wx]

Same here Spectre2300. But it would be cool to take the 3.0 engine from the CTs and then put it in the CT5.

[@imnotusingmyrealname4566]

As a European I like the Newtonmeter numerals.

[@SaintMecha]

Genesis G70 is a way better option imo

[@peteyification]

Yup. No regrets buying mine, after watching the CT5 reviews.

[@yes8032]

Idk what I shall choose

[@GoofieNewfie]

G70 in 3.3T form is a very nice driving car but suffers from massive rotor issues, cheap dash and hard seats and is very small. Performance is quite good though. Lack of sensible dealerships is the deal breaker for me here in Canada.

[@Mgoblagulkablong]

G80 is the comparable model, G70 is smaller and less comfortable.

[@coryw.9086]

The very positive reviews have put the CT5 at the top of my list. Red line picked it over the G70. Nothing wrong with either to be honest, both great cars. I prefer the Cadillac styling.

[@johnhenrymcmahon6878]

I think Cadillac did a really good job bringing these 2 sedans to market when others are leaving it. Love the style, too. Unique and classic.

[@Jrome719]

And, imagine if they returned to model “naming.” Oh, I miss the Seville, Eldorado, & etc. Americans, who buy American, never considers the “European” competitors, So, give us our damn model names-again!

[@MarkRVillano]

I think that when you get into the overall price difference between the more performance oriented versions of the CT5 and the 3 Series, when you whip out your pen and start checking off the boxes in the BMW showroom, that difference will be a lot closer to $15,000. With Mercedes I expect it will be even more.

[@Mgoblagulkablong]

The comparable model to the 3-series is the CT4. The CT5 is for customers who want something bigger and more comfortable.

[@markmiller3279]

Yes, though the current Mercedes interiors help justify some of the price difference. They are special in a way the Cadillac is not. The BMW falls in between, and the Audi A4 is about the same as this model.

[@BN99239]

Keep in mind that BMW and Mercedes lease well too, especially the non-true M and non-true AMG models. So even though these Cadillacs are cheaper on paper, it depends on if you want to buy or lease them. If you want to lease them, they will actually be more expensive.

[@Mgoblagulkablong]

Just bc GM marketing is on crack-cocaine as usual you don't need to repeat their bs. Fact is this car is comparable to E-class, 5 series, G80 etc. and the CT4 is comparable to C-class, 3-series, G70 etc. That it costs less is obviously a plus. It's absurd to compare this car to a different category. That's like comparing a 5-series to a 3-series and then complaining that the 5-series is too big, too heavy and less sporty. People who want this sporty type of car will just buy the CT4. The point of the CT5 is that it is bigger and more focused on comfort than the CT4 and other sport sedans, so it is absurd to compare it to that category.

[@dam4274]

So much more handsome than a Lexus or Avalon with their gaping maw.

[@naveenthemachine]

True but remember that you’re inside the vehicle not outside. Also if you don’t ever want to see the front, just reverse park

[@telliesmith9825]

Ct5 v rear wheel drive that's the one I want motor trend said was the best handling car in class

[@JuanGarcia-zq5tp]

Cadillac seems to have ADD. No that's not a model they sell. They go from names about 20-30 years ago like Seville, Deville, etc. Then they went with letter names we got used to STS, ATS, CTS, SRX and the V-Series. Also they went German in the size categories with a 3-Series size (ATS) and 5 Series size (CTS), and recently the 7 Series size (CT6). But wait what's up with the CT6 name? Oh yeah Cadillac decided to change the names of their cars and SUV's again, CT4, CT5, XT4, XT5, XT6. And the V-Series which is comparable to M-division of BMW, nah Cadillac decided to tranquilize it and make it more of what was once V Sport. Now they are going back to their bigger is better value like the past too? WTF Cadillac, all of this is a recipe for failure.

[@tednugent1100]

Seems like a solid (if boring) car, not sure why Cadillac gets so much hate

[@Twittavelli]

Cause of videos like this that are biased against American brands.

[@carlosponchio1869]

i dont think it is boring at all.

[@darrell9616]

This is an improvement over previous efforts. However, a couple of misses really hurt this car IMO. The fuel economy is just terrible (same has the Hyundai/Kia). They are addressing the gauge cluster next year. However, it should have never shipped with this old one in the first place. An analog gauge cluster can be made to look attractive, but they didn't even try. They still seem to be lost as a brand and their products reflect that.

[@c.h.175]

If I bought one of those cars I would remove that newtonmeter badge asap. (Not like I can afford one but still..)

[@Tully3674]

If I was leasing, I'd get the Volvo. For a purchase, the Caddy as parts will be easier to obtain and cost would be more reasonable (when out of warranty). I may be one of but a few who would rather buy then lease a car.. #Frugal

[@weirdshibainu]

Nope. Caddy prices aren't going to be any cheaper than a Volvo, especially if you source from the dealer. I agree though, I'd rather buy a car than lease

[@mykeonthemove]

Your reviews are more informative than Redline Reviews. You are very objective and your comparisons aren't just biased toward brands you favor. Thank You. Responding to a comment posted below, the CT5 looks nothing like a Malibu nor is it engineered as a front wheel drive midsized family sedan. Additionally I think Cadillac can catch the buyers who are not audi, bmws, or mercedes zombies with the CT5 and CT4. Finally anyone who can afford 50K for a vehicle is not going to buy the Kia Stinger or rather anyone who appreciates the value of their money is not going to buy a car from a brand that makes a car that looks like the Kia Soul. Cadillac represents performance, brand association, and value. Your buy a Stinger to be noticed. In the end, you buy a Cadillac to announce that "you've arrived".

[@paul5683]

Recline Reviews biased? Never! 😅

[@StarShippCaptain]

CT-5 hands down. Thanks for the Stellar Review!

[@realbeetlejuice]

4.6s 0-60..... how much faster do u ppl need... got damn!

[@rolandogamez]

OOF! That C Pillar! They should have just kept making the CTS!

[@maxwella2079]

The badging should be erased...just use the traditional 2.5t or 3.0t. Looks better, makes more sense and simple to read. Overall, this is a great option for entry luxury shoppers.

[@doublehh666]

A ct5 w super cruise and awd would be good enough for most people as a “luxury” daily or “luxury” long distance driver. Just need to have the reliability or warranty to match. Or of course a Genesis G70/80.

[@chiluco2000]

Agreed. And like Alex mentioned, if they could offer the magneride as an option it would compliment the luxury mission very nicely. I like that now there is Genesis as an option to fall back into if the Cadillac can't meet expectations.

[@baldboi504]

I guess we don't consider the Chrysler 300 as a luxury car. This Cadillac is a beautiful car!!!

[@CalvinHikes]

Hmmm... The Star Wars segway wipes effect is a bit cheesy.

[@ridgoro]

that is one nice looking car

[@coach2208]

Still waiting Im ready to buy the ct5 I rather have the ct6 but they don't make it anymore very disappointed.

[@danieljohnson4418]

The rear seat headroom appears adequate. Why do reviewers insist on sitting in an unnaturally upright position to illustrate available headroom? It's really quite silly . . .

[@mikeske9777]

Seems like a nice car but I think I would wait a couple years for the lease returns and then nab one. The only thing is all of these sedans take a enormous hit on depreciation no matter if they are American Euro or Asian.

[@67judge]

I would get the CT5 V loaded with every option avalible 😊. So I won’t feel too bad for not having the Blackwing.

[@WilliamCLAnderson]

The new badges such as the 550 T on this CT5 is just ridiculous. Showing the name of the car and the engine like 3.6 was just fine! It’s one of those “if it isn’t broke don’t fix it” type of thing!

[@FrenchArrogance]

You do a great job on your videos, very thorough and feels unbiased, just subscribed.

[@bikingmoments]

Feels like you filmed this video before 2021 TLX? Otherwise it should have been put in length/legroom comparisons

[@thejake8099]

He mentions the Acura @ 4:37

[@bikingmoments]

The Jake yeah but in a way suggesting that he hadn’t reviewed 2021 TLX

[@thejake8099]

@@bikingmoments yes, correct

[@vvinny0150]

Side profile is screaming Japanese.....Infiniti much?

[@Justkevin377]

I want comfort not the sporty and Best of all its a Cadillac.

[@RTPTechGuy]

Alex, I have a question that I hope you can answer...what do you think about the tactile feel like the switchgear? In my experience with GM vehicles, it tends to feel really cheap with not great tactile feedback. What you show looks encouraging but I just want to know what you think.

[@user-cx2bk6pm2f]

I like what Cadillac is doing! A Black wing version coming too? Yes! Well done Alex.

[@V10PDTDI]

If they would replace the 2 sun roof with a solid full glass panel that might get more head room in the back similar to what the Tesla model 3 has.

[@deandrethompson5341]

Funny how 4.6 sec 0-60 seems normal now

[@spacejaime]

Finally Alex! Everyone else has tested the CT-5V and I was wondering what was holding you back, however, you tested the version I can afford. Bummer on the lack of Magnetic ride, but otherwise looks right for me. What other options beside the sun roof did you have in your test vehicle?

[@phillipmitchell5879]

Alex is one of the most intelligent, clear & thorough auto reviewers on KZbin.

[@rjshather]

Waiting for the 2021 CT5 with supercruise.😀

[@m.b8257]

It’s too bad they forgot the quality, and reliability.

[@raymondbechara9682]

Great review! But since it as big as a Mercedes E class and BMW series 5, why not compare it with those ?

[@jdward45]

I'll take the CT5 3.0 over field

[@imnotusingmyrealname4566]

I wonder how good of a value the Blackwing model will be...

[@benhaze1010]

I would get the revised Stinger GT over all these options actually.

[@mercedesbenzs600bash]

Better warranty also....

[@IReahpZz]

100% agreed. New base 2.5t at the low 30s kills this and same with the gt.

[@IReahpZz]

@Der Schwindel not even close lol. As an owner of a 19 gt2 I'll walk away in a straight line and take em on a curvy road. Cars weight the same and the stinger makes more power for less money. Got my gt2 for 44k new. So almost 20k less than a loaded ct5v with all my options. It's not even a fair comparison for the caddy anyways

[@IReahpZz]

@Der Schwindel as for the 2.0 if we're talking 2021 to 2021the stinger 2.5 out accelerates the base ct5 by at least a second to 60 and the gt is faster than the ct5v in both 0-60 and quarter mile. Not to mention you don't need to pay 60k for an hud and cooled seats. The ct5 is a pretty car but it doesn't hold a candle price wise to the stinger or g70. It's a shame because I like the styling. Also I've heard horrors of the 10speeds tuning in this car for some reason. Downshift take ages from what I've seen in pov vids and other reviews.

[@IReahpZz]

@Der Schwindel Matt farahs one take beats this thing to death and the Topher did a pov vid and downshift are lack luster to say the least. Do a little digging around you'll see what I mean

[@StreakingTiger]

Thanks Alex. Your videos are always helpful. I agree on the 550T being something we recognize. I bought a 2020 XT5 with 400 on the back, and it was confusing. I have no idea what Newton-Meters even means, nor do I care to know. Just tell me the displacement on the badge and I'm okay with that. GM should know better than to try and confuse us. That being said, I love my XT5 Premium Luxury as my research indicated that it beat out so many automakers (BMW, AUDI, Lincoln, Acura, and a lot more). I plan to replace my 14 year old Mercedes in a couple of years, and the CT5 is in my top 5 right now.

[@joedidit3233]

One reason they might not want to just simply put the displacement on the back would be that it could easily be confused with the 3.0 Cadillac V engine that has 25 more horsepower. Seeing the 550T instantly tells you that it's not the 4 cylinder, but a V6, but not the V model.

[@bigcjm]

Its surprising how this vehicle is similar in size to the Kia stinger in a lot of ways. I was on the hunt for a lux car with enough room for car seats. The list gets pretty short when youre not looks to waste and extra 20 grand. That said this and stinger are firmly on the list. I may get a used ct6 depending where the numbers land come purchase time. Thanks for the vid.

[@slscamg]

They started to use the misleading badges when they released their three row crossover with the boring old 3.6 engine and Lincoln blew them out of the water with The standard 3.0 eco-boost engine that produced 400 pound feet of torque. Because conveniently the 3.6 L engine is batched as the 400. It’s horrible.

[@rogerthat24]

I'd debadge that nonsense immediately.

[@mrsparkle001]

Does it have a head up display? I never see it mentioned

[@myemailiscool]

it comes with the tech package, so most if not all ct5's you find on the lots will have it yes. just test drove one today with it, very nice resolution on the HUD

[@josecotto7940]

Great review!

[@timothymorrison2214]

nice review. The only thing now is that there are none in stock at any local Cadillac Dealers in my area.

[@ugaais]

Anoalog I like analog gauges better but this is the first Caddy I’ve liked in awhile

[@agileinference]

isn't it that Cadillac's direction for their cars is to prioritize sportiness over practicality while their crossovers will prioritize practicality? Hence, the CT4 and CT5 will be more 4-series and 6-series GT competitors (i.e., the sports coupes with an extra set of doors)