Battle of Avdiivka - Animated Analysis

[@LucasNyberg-k7x]

I followed this particular battle since it started, this video was really nice to get an understanding of the timeline and progression of the battle, it’s obvious a lot of research and hard work goes into these videos!

[@ahmeddaou8369]

Bakhmut was crazy man, I wonder if it was more epic

[@RambosGrandpa]

Somehow he only gets Ukrainian footage 🤔

[@reaktii]

There are some inaccuracies, and the misleading information could easily be debunked, as it's heavily cherry-picked. But hey, you don't need to be factual as long as the video is plausible enough to be watched, right

[@noexhy]

​@@RambosGrandpa probably this is ukrainian channel

[@derpyyyyyyyyyyyt]

​@reaktii for example?

[@DutchTulipStonks]

It's interesting seeing how Russia has changed their tactics since Avdiivka, now most Russian vehicles have EW protection, collums are swapped for 2-4 vehicles, the use of motorbikes and cope cages increased. Now Russia is 9km from Pokrovsk because they've implemented lessons from their mistakes shown in this video. But man, seeing whole columns getting shredded is scary.

[@KC.edits1]

7km from pokrosvk right now, pokrosvk is also already failing a a logistic hub due to drones

[@Lucas-qk8lc]

This comment is not entirely true. Columns are still used. Reference the past 3-4 weeks of offensive operations on both sides of the conflict

[@jangar5000]

@@Lucas-qk8lc Where exactly ?

[@CursetheVandal]

Some places are still using large columns although i agree with you overall. The k2 guys are currently fighting off both kinds off attacks. Couple motorcycles or 1 or 2 tanks with infantry or full on waves.

[@mellohi6175]

@@brookwhiteman9810 Sources? This is just propaganda and there is little evidence of what you are suggesting.

[@МИЛОШ-ч8и]

Russian losses - one morbillion soldiers Ukrainian losses - one stabbed toe, three tummy aches and a severe case of sore throat.

[@SVRSK]

I swear this guy's videos are so blatantly biased yet people praise him like he's some sort of independent journalist showing us the reality of war lol

[@EdinProfa]

There are also unconfirmed rumors of a couple broken nails.

[@GeloLego99]

@@SVRSK well he is Ukranian, what do you expect, objectivity?

[@МИЛОШ-ч8и]

@@EdinProfa War is hell.. 😔

[@SVRSK]

@@GeloLego99 Should be the priority lol

[@jsimmons9969]

Did you even mention a single piece of ukrainian equipment lost? This is too one sided for my tastes.

[@edwarddavis9706]

Try rewatching the video at 45:40 he clearly stated Russian and Ukrainian vehicular losses.

[@UwigizeP.]

Ukraine, outgunned, outnumbered, unlucky angel, whose needs more and more help. Forgot that almost entire world is already giving everything.

[@cooolek2126]

@@UwigizeP. So what ? You expect everyone to just abandon them xD ?

[@ArsaGauri]

Watch all his videos, he is like 70 % ukraine 30% Russia, but he dares to make video about Ukraine loses.

[@dudeguy-g5f]

@@ArsaGauri He does include Ukrainian losses in his other videos. Just check them out and you will see although Ukraine does not have much equipment to begin with anyways.

[@DrunkbearZ]

bro i get that ur from ukraine but stop being so biased everytime russia captures something you talk about ''heavy losses'' while you never do this for ukraine

[@GeneralMegrel]

Because Ukraine doesn't have the ability to sustain the scale of Russian losses when it's conducting offensives. And when it says "heavy losses" there's probably some truth to it (at least when there are photos/videos)

[@johnclay2716]

@@GeneralMegrel Ukraine had more manpower than Russia for the first year of this war Russia currently has 600k troops at the front while Ukraine has 500k, it's not like Russia has some huge numbers advantage

[@alexww180]

@@johnclay2716 except most of the ukrainian personnel you count is reserves not on the frontlines

[@moishesdeluxeshekelshack8576]

Just because you disagree with something doesn't mean it's propaganda

[@b4nterontilt]

47k KIA and wounded for Russia, 28k KIA, POWs and wounded for Ukraine in battle of Avdiivka

[@jetfighter200]

War Archive forgot to mention that that the AFU pulled out and had to retreat over the open fields were they got hit by arty/ drones and FABs

[@erikholm8918]

He mentioned it

[@DanielNotWise]

​@@erikholm8918 but didn't show the footage.

[@phantomjellyace2877]

Agree! UA losses were so heavily downplayed. It was caught on multiple drone footage that UA had to withdraw on foot under artillery fire and drone drop granade as any attempt for armor to get close is being watched and punished by Russian FVP drone, reason why the abrams and leopard were destroyed before they can even see an enemy.

[@DutchTulipStonks]

​@@phantomjellyace2877I agree, in the retreat from the city while Ukrainian units dissolved, it was a massacre

[@ReTarDigrade]

It's worse than that, the retreat from zenith air defense base was over flat ground in the middle of the night through a gap in yhe Russian lines not even 300meters they were getting gunned down by small arms and grenades, not just artillery and fabs

[@thekz2]

This video boils down to "Russia lost a bajillion tanks and trijonillion men while brave ukrayna heros only got a headache from killing so many orcs and a guy tripped while evacuating the city"

[@andriianashovam7070]

Not really. But you can think whatever you want. But be ready to hear from others what they think about your opinion.

[@gansior4744]

amount of vehicles is so mind blowing, you pretty much haven't seen something like this since WW2

[@engr-aminaow368]

The title of the video should be battlefield of avdeeka from Ukrainian views.

[@miltonpeter1295]

Correct. And according to the video maker Ukraine did not lose a single vehicle and not a single soldier. LOL.

[@sashanest6427]

@@miltonpeter1295 You clearly didn't watch the video

[@userchannel85917]

The "Ukrainian views" is the factual view. Russian propaganda could not come close to making as close of a factual video.

[@Tran5513]

Ukrainian view is as far from the truth as the Russian one. I hope you realize how similar these post soviet states are​@@userchannel85917

[@MarianoMendonça-w3q]

​​@@userchannel85917Im sorry but if you think what he is telling is the truth then you are highly misinformed

[@aanders1990]

I wish he included more sources. There are some pretty bold claims here with no citations.

[@franek335]

like what ?

[@aanders1990]

@@franek335 Saying Russian soldiers were committing suicide in the Tsarska Okhota pipe for example. I haven't heard that anywhere. Is this 3rd party verified claim? Ukrainian report? Random Telegram post?

[@DrunkbearZ]

@@aanders1990 also found that weird never seen any proof of it think he just pulled it out of his ass sad to see this channel is becoming more pro ukraine propaganda with the day

[@eaglemach9992]

@@DrunkbearZ don't worry, soon you will join them

[@LLMOpsHub]

@@aanders1990 he is a propagandist what do you expect

[@depredador93]

What the hell are meat wave attacks? Did you learn military tactics by watching LOTR movies?

[@RatnasirigeMuththa]

It's a pro ukranian channel dude. What did you expect.

[@joaodopneu1]

its like the attacks your boyfriend does to your ass, quite simple actually.

[@muller1424]

noooo its fake, russia dont use military, they have 0 losses, but ukraine lose every day 19000000 milions😭😭😭😭

[@slowlyaffection]

​​@@muller1424не плачь, Тарасик, он просто имеет в виду, что нет в военной науке и тактике определения "мясные штурмы", есть human-wave attack, но ваш миколка с переводом немного прогадал

[@muller1424]

@@slowlyaffection ты сказал что то или просто хрюкнул?

[@saber1885]

I was on the toilet watching historylegends when this battle started in October of last year.

[@moritamikamikara3879]

Shit coming in the top and out the bottom at the same time

[@saber1885]

@@moritamikamikara3879 trvth nvke

[@j2ax136]

​@@moritamikamikara3879are you saying historylegends was wrong?

[@aJamBiscuit]

@@j2ax136historylegends is heavily russian biases (for some reason), he only talks about how “ukraine is going to lose in x way” every single video, and doesn’t do actually good reporting like denys davydov does.

[@goncaloferreira8543]

​@@aJamBiscuit for a moment I thought you were being serious but then I saw you praising denys davydov and then I knew you were being sarcastic, that dude is a much more hardcore pro Ukrainian (justifiably so ngl) then history legends is pro Russian, he only reports on Ukrainian victories. In historylegends case at least he does some videos of Ukrainian victories and often criticizes Russian tactics even when they are winning.

[@maskr5520]

I feel like this video isn’t really neutral on information given Endless russian orcs meatwave and dumb rush assaults against brave ukrainians that only retreats when theyre outnumbered

[@WWSzar]

There's plenty of footage of big failed assaults, the type of footage you saw of failed assault waves of Ukrainians during their Summer offensive in 2023 happens to Russia on a much more regular basis since the start of the war.

[@agm-88_harm]

@@WWSzar Because it's true. I personally confirm this.

[@Who-rx5ky]

@@agm-88_harm Evidence?

[@TheDeNz4]

@@Who-rx5ky Evidence - trust me bro

[@ivanbastos4963]

@@agm-88_harm Sure, buddy. Take your pills and go back to sleep

[@AlexanderJohnLee]

this dude probably has a Stephan Bandera poster in his basement

[@Hakkur123]

probably but apart from his interpretation the facts are still facts

[@TheWarArchive]

Yeah, just bought it for money received from US State Department.

[@Shad0wack]

Based?

[@josephspiderbite8795]

@@TheWarArchive this is pro ukr shit. tell the truth ..!!!

[@Who-rx5ky]

@@Shad0wack You do realise that is the same dude who collaborated with the Nazis and whose organisation committed genocide against ethnic Poles so any post war Polish state couldn't claim the regions?

[@CiiTiiZzeN]

Always looking forward to more of these! Today is a good day, especially with the Toropets News still going.

[@brandonden795]

It's actually so fucked that Ukraine is like, "wow we can hit arms depots now :)", when Russia has blasted anything and everything for 2+ years. Just imagine if Russia couldn't fire missiles into Ukraine, how much could they even have achieved?

[@gony157]

What is the source of 16000 Russians KIA? I know there was some russian blogger that posted on Telegram that number but doesn't seem to be creditable source. Both sides closely keep their losses secret. And both sides sides greatly exaggerate the other side losses.

[@majk5995]

16 000 was by the blogger that comitted suicide shortly after posting, and AFU claimed 17 000. No idea how much Russia says they lost

[@Goerge-lu3ok]

Andrei morozov had been fighting in ukraine since 2014 and was a well known figure amongst russian milbloger. He was not a shaddy account of unkownw origin and without a name And the fact that they pressured him into suicide after revealing the number says a lot. To be fair we dont even know if he actually suicided or if the russians killed him and made it look like a suicide

[@The_ZeroLine]

I manually counted 🇷🇺 infantry losses using hundreds-of-videos + pics from a 10-day period in mid-Feb. and identified 3,283 KIA + roughly 1,400 WIA. That’s nearly 5K casualties alone. IIRc, the UAF’s claims for 🇷🇺 losses during that 10-day period was circa 9k casualties. It took nearly two-weeks to examine all that media and cross-reference to make sure I wasn’t double counting anything. I’m sure there were also many casualties not visible on camera or simply never filmed.

[@The_ZeroLine]

The one thing I’ll say is that while 🇷🇺 losses are astronomical and at least 4x times higher, 🇺🇦 losses are much, much higher than you’ll hear in any media. I’ve been able to determine that based on the number of Ukrainians who have received prosthetic limbs since 2/24/22 for which there is lots of publicly available data. Anyway, while Russia makes ludicrous claims, the only time Ukraine pulled numbers out of their behinds was regarding VKS airframe losses during the first few months of the war which was for propaganda losses when everything seemed to be hanging by a string. Besides that, the numbers they report on Russian losses rarely exceeds the true total by more than 15%. They know that if they make up silly numbers that cannot be confirmed as accurate within a decent margin, people will not take anything they say seriously. Unlike 🇷🇺, a loss of trust and credibility is not something 🇺🇦 can afford.

[@calebman9999]

​@The_ZeroLine that is a complete inversion of reality and we will find out when the war is over. Russia's losses have been hugely over exaggerated for western propaganda purposes.

[@phantomjellyace2877]

Ukrainian losses were heavily downplayed. Not even a single video of UA soldiers fleeing on foot while being watched by drone and under constant artillery fire inflictng significant casualties or the UA supply road literally filled with destroyed vehicles or the 3rd azov getting hit by artillery before on their staging area. Lastly, It was portrayed that only UA were using large number of FPV drones were in reality Russia uses it as much as UA do, that's why any attempt to counter attack was repulsed.

[@agm-88_harm]

I fought for Avdiivka. Our losses are several times smaller than Russian losses. This is the minimum.

[@freetime5803]

@@agm-88_harm we totally believe you

[@phantomjellyace2877]

@@agm-88_harm sure buddy.

[@jamesshepard2672]

This channel has always has a UA tilt

[@jay1jayf]

@@agm-88_harm The coper of avdiivka

[@zhendos2]

when he talks about the failures of the Russian army, he shows it all in detail and even draws how it all happened, and when he talks about the failures of the Ukrainian army (and then he does it very rarely, only the most important moments, although there are enough failures on their part), then for some reason without any confirmation. The most unbiased source (sarcasm).

[@erikholm8918]

it´s because russian military doctrine IS a failure... its very hard to not get wet when its raining unless your wearing A "hat" like you are.

[@Brexley]

Yes this guy is a twat

[@engr-aminaow368]

He is pro- Ukraine, 99% of the video footage is from Ukrainian side and when you keep hearing his emphasis on the Russian lost then, that tell you everything

[@gorillawayfarer]

Go watch ren tv or konashenkovs briefings so as to be well informed about Ukrainian failures and casualties, I'm convinced you'll find your object of attraction there

[@andrewglynn1982]

​@@thiefsleef6752Because it was there for all to see. It was undeniable

[@matthewvargas2264]

Anybody that followed the battle in detail knows russia took heavy losses in the beginning of the battle but once russia broke thru the defensive lines the Ukrainens got wrecked afterwards . The russians didnt have a choice but use brute force to dislodge the Ukrainens out of there defensive positions . In war you have accept your going to take losses theres no such thing as a perfect victory. At the end of the day Ukraine lost the battle and payed a heavy price trying hold advika. To say Ukraine didnt take heavy losses is ludicrous. Ukraine thru everything they had to hold advika and still lost . Advika paved the way to prokrosk .

[@aussie870]

There are tactics and strategies that have been in place for decades to minimize the expected losses during these sorts of operations however. Comparing Russia's performance in Ukraine so far to something like Desert Storm is such a vivid difference that it's hard to grasp for many. Russia theoretically has the same equipment and potential to replicate the advantages of the Coalition powers in the Gulf War, but don't due to misappropriation of resources and a clear lack of inter-service co-operation. Air power is held back to such a limited capacity due to Russia's inability to achieve air supremacy despite having the resources and equipment possible to do so. This is why I don't think Russia deserves the title of second 'greatest' power militarily, since it can't seem to provide any precedence to the claim.

[@matthewvargas2264]

@@aussie870 camparing desert storm to Ukraine is like comparing apples and oranges. Huge difference between the two . Ukraine is a nato backed army . The iraqi army was a hyped up army by the west to make it seem like they defeated a great adversary but reality the iraqi army was complete garbage from the start. Without nato support and preporation the Ukrainen army would of suffered the same fate and that is the truth . Nato intelligence and satellites is the main reason why Ukraine knows when and where the russians are going to attack without it ukraine would be blind as a bat . There is many other things nato offers to ukraine aswell that you have to take into consideration. Without nato support the Ukrainen army would of been defeated very easily most likely within 6 months . So russian tactics and stragetys would of worked if nato never got involved. Its hard to defeat an enemy that can see your every move coming from miles away .

[@aussie870]

@@matthewvargas2264 You've missed my point. Russia has all the tools neccesary to perform similarly, but they either don't or can't. NATO help can only go so far when they barely even keep their foot in the door, whereas Russia has almost completely moved over to a war economy and is completely invested in the war, so in reality Russia should be having an even easier time comparatively.

[@DutchTulipStonks]

I adore these videos, but could we see more videos of Ukrainian loses? I noticed it was massively downplayed and neglected, especially with the Ukrainian retreat from the city, i remember seeing videos of hundreds of Ukrainians walking through fields escaping, Ukraine lost something like ~800 from the withdrawal alone, not to mention men left in the city. Still loved the video, your mapping is something special.

[@Who-rx5ky]

There was also the abandoned equipment that could not be retrieved due to the the botched retreat at the last minute.

[@forgingapath8809]

You typically arent going to see much that doesn't support the "UKRANSA!" narrative, Ive followed the war since it kicked off and noticed that even now the coverage is still slanted in UKR favor. RUS has stated that their MAIN objective is not the taking of territory but the destruction of UKR fighting ability, the slow and constant grind of machines and personnel is whats happening but all you hear about is UKR invading Kursk.

[@brookwhiteman9810]

Yes......they walked through the fields escaping......that's what retreating is. Ukraine was ordered to retreat, they didn't just decide to run for it at the last minute. The numbers that were confirmed is 150 men were casualties from the beginning of the retreat to the end. There is this idea that Ukraine leaves their men no option to retreat, the units in avdiivka were given a specific timeframe to retreat and 3rdAB was brought in to allow for other units to retreat. It didn't go perfectly to plan but the losses were minimal if you consider how many would have been captured if there was a complete encirclement. There was some large positions that got encircled and captured. The reason there isn't much coverage of the Ukrainian losses is because the losses were so insanely disproportionate from the beginning of the avdiivka offensive and Ukraine was so vastly outnumbered that Ukrainian losses were not a question on people's minds. The russian propagandist who revealed Russia's losses was killed the next day.

[@arc1419]

I mean, there arent many other ways to "retreat" in open ground while not risking the vehicles to the superior russian firepower so they just had to RUN

[@SheWar79]

рюськая "консерва"! 🖕😎

[@Ace-id3ky]

Ukraine did not successfuly evacuate avdeevka, hundereds of soldiers ended up encircled and killed or taken prisoners, if you're doing an analysis do it correct no matter who you support.

[@juannieves8642]

I rememberd they even send one of the most important brigade(47th?) to rescue them but on the way they got hit by iskander in two arrivals and lost 2000 soldield in vain

[@GeneralMegrel]

Source is your hopes and dreams

[@GeneralMegrel]

@@juannieves8642 Then they lost 20,000 soldiers in a drone strike

[@ym6294]

​@@juannieves8642bs you got proof no you don't that's a lie keep being a hypocrite you z bot have no shame.

[@lucaslod2731]

@@GeneralMegrel yeah 1 bazilion ukrainians and 2 death stars. We have footages from Avdievka and photo proofs that russian losses were high and ukrainian losses were average, which kinda make sense cause Ukraine is in defense in a prepared position.

[@Rex-44490]

Ukrainian losses have strangely disappeared from the video review. I would not be surprised if one day Ukraine loses entire armies - the author will continue to consider Russian losses

[@Rex-44490]

@@wallingnaga6563And not even two hundred. Horror

[@viamilitaris011]

In the end, I expected a man to announce the victory of the Ukrainians.

[@mladenmilivojevic5685]

True 😅 man they were crushing it 47 minutes of the video but somehow they lost 😅 my god these pro ukrainian channels are crazy

[@GeneralMegrel]

@@mladenmilivojevic5685 Where is your detailed and sourced coverage of the battle? Please enlighten us

[@azoorfox9683]

@@mladenmilivojevic5685 It's incredible how supposedly Ukraine did everything right, killed 1000:1, obliterated thousand of vehicles and still lost so badly that they still haven't managed to hold this frontline. 🤷‍♂ It's almost as most of those claims are quite exaggerated and ukraine lost way more than they said....

[@Jimbotheone]

​@@mladenmilivojevic5685What do you mean? It's 47 minutes of Ukraine barely holding on, with several setbacks. Russian massive losses and occasional blunders were part of their tactics.

[@SRT10VIPER]

😂 so true. I'm pretty sure he cries after each video he makes. He "drinks" the same coke Lil z "drinks"

[@SpanishDio]

These videos are incredible, this type of videos sure take a lot of time and research, thanks for your work this is the thing that makes YT great, this is literally like all those WW2 videos about different fronts but in 2024, we are truly living history in the making, thanks for clearing up this war! loved the analysis! much love from Spain.

[@Goerge-lu3ok]

The bad thing is that you cant actually include the results of the attacks on youtube because they are graphic. So you end up having a bunch of pro russian suckers on the comments saying "no bro,ukranians suffered heavier losses" while whoever followed the combat footage back then,saw things we had never seen the 2 years of the war. Whole fields with russian kias. Videos with 50 kias in a single field etc etc

[@TheWarArchive]

That's true. A big chunk of work after collecting the battle footage is to choose what can and can't be shown, especially since the current KZbin rules are quite ambiguous.

[@Goerge-lu3ok]

@@TheWarArchive you are doing a great job

[@diegosalazar550]

@@TheWarArchive That's true, you get in trouble less when you post russian losses.

[@MarianoMendonça-w3q]

​@@diegosalazar550lol 🤣🤣

[@Frankmysteriojr]

amazing video again, keep them coming thank you!

[@audiosurfarchive]

I like the continued quality increases. The Operations Room and Liveth For Evermore are great influences I sense

[@Krasniok]

This is the biggest lie about the capture of Avdeevka

[@Joaquin546]

Sure sure comrade

[@damienb2074]

I'm kind of disappointed. Ive been following your channel for long but now you are talking about a battle i actually followed in details and, how to put that simply... If all your videos are so biased i guess i have to look at them again and deny them the qualities i found. Listening to you, this battle is just a continuous failure of Russian, and continuous wins of Ukrainian (the part on the corridor is quite typical, the only thing you manage to say is that "its a trap, and people are dying, committing suicide on it", yet two minutes later you finally admit that " ho well it destroyed the Ukrainian equilibrium"). I really wonder how those Ukrainians then lost ? Ho no, actually i know "because they lacked supplies of westerns allies" and "because Russian sent wave of suicide troops (didn't manage to back that with a video tho). Actually, and its a bit disappointing, this channel is one more deepstate / military summary. Good map following, but the comments are biased. Its worth noting tho, that the Russian with even less vehicles, and even less artillery advantage (its estimated 1to 3 now comparing to 1 to 10 during end of 2023 are still pushing, and the Ukrainian are still going backward). Those human waves must be very strong

[@baggmaann]

You watched that history legends video about meat waves too?

[@R3nchi]

your copium is very strong

[@BronnBlackwater]

True, Ukrainians suffered a massive defeat and enormous casualties in this city, more attention should have been given to the difficulties of the UA

[@KINGPIN-LIFE]

​@@R3nchihe's right. Ukrainian losses are barely covered. Nothing to do with "cope" just a factual analysis. Denying this says more about you than the comment.

[@nabukotokei]

People dont understand the nature of war, but theres no point, these media are suppose to be influencing the good side of Ukraine because thats what propaganda needs. Do you really think the basic civilian living in U.S, Canada, Britain, Korea, ETC needs to know full details of what goes on in Ukraine, most of them dont even give a dam besides petty sympathy. Ukraine was a sham, NATO doesnt honestly care, it was a good test bed for the test of "Modern engagement" but besides that they dont care of the good health of Ukraine. If you are inside the "Allies" think tank, they already knew Ukraine situation was not gonna improve, most generals you see or spokes person just blatantly says what they need to say for the public. (There is a reason why theres a public relation career in the armed forces and how they govern what you say publicly) The business already got their fill when they loaned out Ukraine, poor ******* are now drowning in overseas dept which no matter how you look at it, their recovery is going to be painful. Aid package is a pipe dream, because all that money circulated back into the allies for equipment and supplies, which does not even cover most of the cost they need. This tension between COPE of two sides are just stupid, and too be honest, i doubt any of them actually cares, humans are simple creatures, so you have to expect their human characteristic. If you do your research, good job, you actually want to know whats happening, and both sides are having impacts, but dont expect the the world to be on your side, some of the people are just trolls that maybe supports the side they want to support. Or some might be overly patriotic, regardless, most people are just puppets to media now adays, and these media are screwing everyone over.

[@Fabbiebeats]

Your video is just filled with excuses for Ukraine and consolations. be objective tell us what really happed i don't really care about the politics

[@baggmaann]

Yeah I feel like he only shows Russian losses, surely there are videos about Ukraine losses

[@Fabbiebeats]

@@baggmaann you understand what I am saying. We need facts about this war it wasn’t the Russians alone that made tactical errors even the Ukrainian did

[@mladenmilivojevic5685]

Facts!👍

[@Francisco-ow6bl]

He only shows proykrianian videos, and only shows Russia videos if they are the only way to document key moments. ​@@baggmaann

[@jcancino630]

what about the dozens of videos circulating on the internet showing dead bodies in what appeared to looked like a rout, you failed to mention it. You also failed to mention the heavy roll the new FAB played during the battle. again why?

[@jetfighter200]

Even the AFU soldiers there said they get pounded by ~90 FABs/ day

[@superspies32]

And he did not even mention that the inaccuracy of UMPK Fab is NOTHING compared to its explosion range. So why you have to spend trillions of USD to fix the goddamn wing of JDAM when you just spend extra Rubbles to insert more explosive to the bomb and negate its inaccuracy completely

[@salvagedude625]

did you and I watch the same video?

[@愛を込めてロシアから]

​@@jetfighter200 FB said it was 200 per day but at the peak 240-250. Now Russia even send 4 umpk-fab-500 at detected mavic operators.

[@kobekkop]

the thumbnail attracted me because it looked like a hoi4 frontline.

[@YAH2121]

Despite my criticism i am impressed with your research on the units.

[@jaypeepatagnan7668]

the narrator sounds like Uks never lost a battle. AFU lost 2 vehicles only and not a single soldier. must be balanced reporting! far removed from reality! so much arse licking.

[@maplegumm]

God I hope your getting some good cock for these comments

[@ivanbastos4963]

My man actually claimed the JDAMs were more accurate than the FABs, even though we know Russians have almost killed their entire effectiveness on the field through electronic warfare. This is straight propaganda with a tiny sprinkle of war reporting

[@Realjohn_]

I would say the the usage of FPV drones/ UAV drones has definetly changed how russia thought the war would go on. If there were no drones usage, i would think the war would have been over a long time go

[@johnlenin830]

The war would have ended long ago if dozens of NATO countries had not supplied Ukraine with everything it needed to fight, from weapons, ammunition and intelligence to medicine, uniforms and transportation. Without Western money, the Ukrainian economy would have died long ago.

[@doubletherapyyy]

@@johnlenin830 ukraine won battle for kyiv and first month of the war without western help, stop repeating russian takes

[@johnlenin830]

@@doubletherapyyy exactly, in the first months of the war, because Russia underestimated the enemy. The war has been going on for 2.5 years, last summer there was an unsuccessful Ukrainian offensive, now Russia is slowly but surely advancing in Donbass. Ukraine is incapable of fighting a long war on its own, now almost all of its armored vehicles are Western-made, its foreign debt exceeds 100% of gdp. These are not "russian takes", this is objective reality.

[@johnlenin830]

@@doubletherapyyy exactly, in the first months of the war, because Russia underestimated the enemy. The war has been going on for 2.5 years, last summer there was an unsuccessful Ukrainian offensive, now Russia is slowly but surely advancing in Donbass. Ukraine is incapable of fighting a long war on its own, now almost all of its armored vehicles are Western-made, its foreign debt exceeds 100% of gdp. These are not "russian takes", this is objective reality.

[@doubletherapyyy]

@@johnlenin830 Western help in optimal amount haven't been sent since autumn 2023. All that time, somehow, with a constant lack of ammunition, 100% russian superiority in all types of ammunition(including air superiority) ukraine still defends

[@danielelombardo8196]

video prediction: this will be 50 minutes of the narrator talking about nothing other than russian losses, downplaying the loss of the city with a tasty side dish of "they won, BUT AT WHAT COST?!" cope.

[@franek335]

16 000 casualities for one fortified city , there are thousand of cities like that

[@baggmaann]

​@@franek335thousand? Nope.

[@sajuente8235]

Congratulations you captured city you were fighting for from 2014. City.... little bit of asphalt and concrete debris

[@reaktii]

At this point, he's just insulting Ukrainian heroes who actually lost heroically in battle. Like, I know Wagner is just a number, but damn... these Ukrainian heroes aren't even acknowledged for their sacrifice; according to him, they simply disappeared and went missing

[@RasyidNazar]

@@franek33516000? Bullshit , both side lost about 10000 men in battle for avdiivka

[@chill2512]

I think upcoming video sometimes should be vote on community tab so somebody could get what they like:) Also great video❤

[@ciilqabeduubi3953]

Russia might have suffered heavier losses when they were storming the city at the beginning, but once they encircled the Ukrainians it was all over. It was a complete one side massacre in the end

[@horoshkoaleksandr273]

Keep coping, Moscow troll

[@daninquin2732]

It was just one battalion of the Third assault brigade that was involved in the withdraw operation

[@FredFurburguer]

Same with most units shown. It should specify "elements of X brigade", as it seems to be the norm in how units are used in this war.

[@JeffGordon-ph4vz]

The third assault brigade IS A BATTALION. Some brigades are only a single battalion strength the same thing can happen to regiment type organizations. Elite units are usually smaller. Like during their American Revolution the continental army infantry regiments were in reality only battalions and those battalions were company strength not the textbook strength.

[@daninquin2732]

@@JeffGordon-ph4vz they are a brigade with 6 infantry battalions(mech and motor) and one tank battalion, there are no single battalions brigades only separate battalions, and the 3rd assault isnt special forces or something like that is just a brigade that has excellent leadership and thus performance, just like the 72nd, 59 motorised, 81st airmobile and a bunch more

[@JeffGordon-ph4vz]

@@daninquin2732 yes those are all elite brigades. Elite does not equate special forces I mean elite in terms of unit eliteness like the Imperial Guard of the napoleonic wards was considered and elite unit. Those brigades form the backbone if the Ukrainian army they dont take major offensive operations without those units.

[@ДанилоАносов]

Дякую автору за велику пророблену роботу, за пояснення англомовній аудиторії про нашу війну, чіткий аналіз і розбір боїв, дякую за вашу роботу!

[@ivanjokovic]

I was waiting for this 👏👏👏

[@vxnxnxm]

So many copium lovers here. Go see Konashenkov's reports about destroying three death stars, four Darth Vaders and fifty-five biolaboratories with a single shot.

[@VINAYTHAKUR-p3r]

You only show russian losses properly but not ukrainiuns 😢

[@franek335]

Since Russian were more impressive , during the video of the summer counter offensive he almost only showed ukrainian losses

[@KRKRK-sr4cx]

@@franek335he downplayed Ukrainian losses in that video as well, and tried to paint the capture of robotyne, a village with a prewar population

[@jetfighter200]

@@KRKRK-sr4cxeven the american analysts said that in the 2nd half of the battle AFU suffered heavier loses than the russians 😅

[@brookwhiteman9810]

You sound convincing.....shame the vdv commander who fought the Ukrainian offensive said otherwise. And there was Popov as well......when he told gerasimov the reality they threatened to charge him with blackmail and removed him from his position. Kinda like how Murz went to avdiivka and revealed Russia's insane losses and then died mysteriously the next day. What a shame. Weird how all the russians who revealed the truth get removed from their position and then go missing. Really weird that. And as for you "American analyst" he's probably about as credible as all the other "analysts" on Russia's payroll. If you want the truth you only have to look as far as the videos the Russians release themselves talking about the situation. Is it Ukraine running recruitment campaigns in 3rd world countries with travel agencies?......no....not it's not.

[@Pmni_MW]

He basically said that no battalions were surrounded, dude, there are proof if you search of just how many soldiers were captured, some of them the same day the city fall were fleeing running on feet, you telling me that 3rd Azov, hold a goddamned division worth of Russians with complete air support, and artillery support, yeah, sure

[@davesk5523]

GJ and thank you for your work

[@BronnBlackwater]

Where are the Ukrainian mistakes and losses?

[@banana6837]

That the fun part, there were none since Ukraine is so superior than dog Russian troops(I’m being ironic this dude just doesn’t show Ukrainian losses cause bias probably, sad to see it was a pretty good channel too)

[@javierarancibia4941]

Literal, este canal sera miy bueno pero sele olvida poner elementos importantes como olvidar que todas las tropas alcanzaron a retirarse de advíikva no sera mas de los 3000 abanadonados que dejo el comando ucraniano😅

[@maplegumm]

@@banana6837he literally showed Ukrainian loses and talked about them multiple times throughout the video.

[@ulyssesbarker470]

Ukraine doesn't make mistakes Welcome to War Archive

[@ahmadomar5806]

Ukraine has no losses, that's why they have shortage of troops and forceful conscription are underway

[@Counted_Coup]

damn these are really well made

[@IceP67]

To think that the russian are near pokhrovsk now in such a small time is insane now

[@ethulwulf5351]

Yes, because all the people who know how to fight are in Kursk

[@IceP67]

@@ethulwulf5351 and have a 30% chance of being encircled if Russia plays it right

[@meinnase]

Truly insane, they moved through .52% of territory in a month instead of the usual 3.

[@IceP67]

@@meinnase cope harder lol, what happened to the winners (Ukraine). How much percentage of Russia they get??

[@meinnase]

@@IceP67 Ukraine gets the russian slaves leaving their country at some point. Noone wants shit ruski soil. Saying cope while nurturing a 2 1/2 year copium addiction doesnt make you sound like a winner btw.

[@SeanP7195]

The bots taking this one hard. They out in full force.

[@profinneupane6883]

Nah the footages that were released after the fall were devastating to watch, so many bodies of retreating soldiers were laying on the roads😢. I hope this conflict ends soon

[@MA-me3rm]

Ukraine won , Russia lost , Ukraine won , Russia lost , Ukraine won , Russia lost , Ukraine won , Russia lost , Ukraine won , Russia lost , Ukraine won , Russia lost , Ukraine won , Russia lost , Ukraine won , Russia lost , Ukraine won , Russia lost , At the end , Ukraine lost , Russia WON. What a bias display. 😂😂😂

[@decimusdecius7858]

You can win battles and lose the war anyway. Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck and his Schüttztruppe is great example, never losing battle for german colony of East Africa, but gradually withdrawing from land due to enemy having more men than he had ammo for his soldiers.

[@majk5995]

What exactly is biased here? It's just a retelling of what happened lmao. The only thing I could say was one sided is combat footage. He showed plenty of failed russian assaults but didn't show footage of ukrainians retreating out of the city.

[@sb7467]

Losing meat waves after meat waves and losing tank waves after tank waves only gives phyrric victory. In the end Russian accomplishes very little and “saved” very little lives.

[@vuth7090]

The Russians did not lose but how long did it take them to capture it, how much equipment and manpower did they lose?

[@reaktii]

At this point, he's just insulting Ukrainian heroes who actually lost heroically in battle. Like, I know Wagner is just a number, but damn... these Ukrainian heroes aren't even acknowledged for their sacrifice according to him, they simply disappeared and went missing

[@patrickmiller4877]

A very biased report!

[@jaro551]

Your videos are by far one of the best on this war. You put all these seperate videos I see online of equipment being destroyed or positions being taken into much needed, easily digestible context. I have seen much of the footage, but it's very difficult to see the bigger picture and honestly even the details of the footage itself without the context. Can't appreciate it enough!

[@IceP67]

Fabs are better than American Jdams. Why? They are cheap and can be spammed

[@andrewbirdsell2638]

Because they are different things, you doughnut Not comparable weapon systems.

[@asavelakuse6865]

Finally the most bloodest battle that has led to the current battles and the taking of the most fortified position in all of Ukraine this battle will be reviewed for years to come bravery all round. Don't care how you feel politically it takes guts to attack take such a fortress.

[@blacmagicwand]

Glide bombs reduced fortified positions to dust

[@muller1424]

take for what? Such losses will never justify taking a fortified position

[@muller1424]

Russia is literally burying a combat-ready army to collect the ashes of the Donbas cities

[@asavelakuse6865]

@@muller1424 It's what's happened in the past year that shows otherwise plus if the Russians rebuild fortifications like they did in 2023 the Ukrainians won't have the strength to retake Avdiivka

[@teblack2]

“Fun fact” is you can say it that way. After the battle of Bahkmut Russia had to pause the progress to recuperate and consolidate forces, in contrast the siege of Avdiivka keeps with momentum hinting that the casualties of 1 of the sides are complete fabricated, either Russia lost less personnel that people speculated or Ukraine suffered much more that they portrayed it, either way you cannot scape of logical thought here

[@agagqbq]

holy low iq

[@superspies32]

And I think causalities of Ukraine was much higher, remember Orychentyne disaster? Many theorized that the real reason was because the unit supposed to replace the guard moved out of their shift did not exist anymore.

[@agagqbq]

@@superspies32 you switched to the wrong alt account, unlucky

[@superspies32]

@@agagqbq what alt?

[@JeffGordon-ph4vz]

⁠@@agagqbqwhat are you talking about. His difference of opinion makes him a bot and what does that make you 😂

[@fishfish8879]

“All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.” ― Sun tzu, The Art of War

[@stkrrauch1]

it was far from a controlled retreat it looked like a run as fast as you can in the opposite direction of the russians retreat

[@Struggle-Snuggle]

I don't see how Ukraine could have overlooked the sewer system, that seems like a big blunder. Also it was clear Avdiivka was going to fall, why didn't they have a solid line to fall back to?

[@namesurname624]

just to be sure, are there 1 or 2 avdiivkas that are being talked about? because i'm getting super confused

[@wing_nimbus]

there is only one city if that's what you mean

[@erikholm8918]

theres 7

[@charliematts1736]

There are 2 Avdiivkas

[@robertamann2093]

with in the ukriana area pre-soviet era and post 1991 pre 2014 many repeat settlements, small villages, micro districts, small towns, larger towns, small cities, large cities, metropolitan area, oblasts, etc. have same names. it's a weird reality. ukriana is a very weird place in it's middle and western parts for FN 900 years.

[@charliematts1736]

@@robertamann2093 next time, try typing in cyrillic please, don’t murder english, it’s obvious you’re russian

[@DMasterplanL]

About the ammunition deliveries failing to get to Ukraine, I will disagree on that because there is not only issue of deciding to bring in the ammo, but also of manufacturing it. We are now in September of 2024 and that problem is still nowhere near to being solved. Ukraine did have the fortune of drone technology being able to do things it does, which is why Russia suffered so many losses, but also Ukraine was simply outgunned, outmanned and outproduced by Russia.

[@chadmicmac5029]

Great videos❤

[@Hugo16071]

War Archive and HistoryLegends for sure are the best commentators in this war, the levels of details are amazing. Great video!!

[@DutchTulipStonks]

I absolutely agree, both are neutral as well. The best for daily in depth updates is WillyOAM and best for daily map only updates is WeebUnion. HistoryLegends and War Archive are the gold standard though

[@Dancorg]

@@DutchTulipStonks what? history legends is absolutely pro russian, weebunion too but less overtly

[@jay1jayf]

@@Dancorg war archive is more pro ukraine than hisory legends is pro russian

[@weaseltheweasel302]

@@jay1jayfdefinitely

[@Jimbotheone]

​@@Pravlordand Serbs are typically pro-russian

[@ronaldp7573]

My question is, how did those two Ukrainian soldiers drive those Bradleys so well? Wouldn't their massive balls be a handicap? The same massive balls one needs to fight a battle tank with an IFV? Really, its a paradox.

[@max-imal8588]

Great video!

[@thinkmechanically]

whenever author talk about Ukrainian setbacks uses words like "HOWEVER" LOL .author is talking like a mouthpiece of Zelensky

[@RustyBear]

This is gonna be a banger

[@Cold_Thunder]

True

[@sikorsky5815]

ONG

[@RustyBear]

@@Cold_Thunder yooo wassup, didnt know u watch him too

[@ruslanposnov6659]

l add Separate Special Operations Center "Vostok". as you know, they, together with the 3rd separate assault brigade, fought in the center of Avdeevka on February 17

[@ThatcherYT]

The saddening part about the production of these videos is your undeniable bias, on every talking point your rarely mentioning any detail on Russian advances, and victories during the siege, only really talking about Ukraines success. The Ukrainians lost the battle. Why make it seem like a victory?

[@unknownname6519]

The super mario squad.. A true masterclass... Thats what changed the fate of the City

[@ghettotasher1060]

Sure, it's clear he has some bias towards showing Ukrainian soldiers in a much more favourable way, but it's still a good production video nevertheless. I hope future releases can use more neutral language. This could really then become a great historical source.

[@ghettotasher1060]

nevermind, as I got to the end, the amount of bias in coverage is kind of laughable, ok. this will never be an objective source aside from the map changes lmao

[@ym6294]

Cope z bot go soying some where else if you want Pro z vid there on KZbin then go there you just don't like the fact Russian Nazi lost a lot of men.

[@zacharyraut151]

If Russian army got so destroyed in avdiivka how is the pokrovsk front collapsing? These biased channels are so obnoxious

[@andriianashovam7070]

Unfortunately, ruzzian army wasn't destroyed. Somewhat weakend, probably. Ruzzians still have considerable advantage in manpower, artillery, aviation etc... The fact Ukraine still holds the front while slowly retreating is a colossal effort.

[@jimamar]

Why did Russian make so little progress? Maybe I look different.

[@crochou8173]

3rd sep assault's charge is epic

[@88GAF]

Not even 5 minutes in and IMMEDIATELY states that human waves tactics are being used. Not only do these types of attacks never work the Russians haven't used them, not even in WW2 did they use them. Great information being mixed in with garbage results in a garbage presentation. Russians do not use human wave tactics not a single video has come out showing this, they use platoon sized assault groups supported by APC style vehicles and that is why they have been taking ground. Stop discrediting them simply because you don't like them otherwise you'll get your ass kicked over and over again. You need to respect your opponents the same way you respect a virus, you don't have to like it but never underestimate its desire to put you in an early grave.

[@lukecanete5639]

Well said sir

[@natebox4550]

They did use them in ww2, just in very small amounts, and generally right at the beginning of the war. Russia also have used them before, during ww1(albeit that was common place for everyone).

[@88GAF]

@@natebox4550 The only evidence we have for human waves tactics being used during the beginning of WW2 was more akin to a banzai charge rather than an actual tactic. As for WW1 I didn't count that as that was the standard tactic for the time with trench warfare doctrine.

[@natebox4550]

@@88GAF You stated Russians never used em, but as noted they obviously did during ww1. Nonetheless, wouldn’t a banzai charge be considered a human wave attack? I’d say it would be.

[@88GAF]

@@natebox4550 2 things 1 if we are going to argue schematics then yes I should have worded it as they never used them as commonly portrayed, however they have not used them once in Ukraine which was the point and during WW2 the few isolated incidents we have is when pockets of cut off troops were out of supplies/ammo and didn't wish to surrender. Big difference between desperation and a doctrinal tactic. Now uniquely the Japanese did include banzai charges in their doctrine but that was the last resort measure because if you have no ammo and don't want to surrender then you got 1 option.

[@valorz6064]

Great editing and easy to follow 👍

[@alimahmoud109]

شرح غير دقيق للمعركة

[@LuisLopez-zh9kh]

Mankind hasn't seen this level of fighting and sheer determination to fight since WW2.

[@9iht6ihgt43rzhijj]

Vietnam was very brutal too as far as I know...

[@Spinly_ohio]

Korean war

[@shnitzilhazel9957]

Yes there has, the tigray war, the second congo war, both of which happened just this century.

[@china6714]

The author watches a lot of Ukrainian propaganda. If he had reviewed Suvorov's battle when he took Izmail, he would have said that the Russians simply rushed in the hordes to the walls, and the Turks with the latest rifles, hid behind the walls built by the best engineers of the West and did not have time to fight them off, and the Turks had to take more advantageous positions inside the Izmail fortress and then they fought back there as harshly as possible, which affected the most enormous losses, which Suvorov made up for with newly mobilized Cossacks, and so the Russian Untermenschen (approved by hitler 👍) took Izmail. For some reason, the Russian army turned out to be stronger, one small socialist country, the DPRK, can supply the entire Russian army with shells, while the entire NATO bloc with the USA, Great Britain, France, Germany cannot supply shells to Ukraine . Some statements described by the author are refuted even by Western journalists who were physically in Avdiivka and showed how the Ukrainian army was fleeing uncontrollably from its positions, that the Ukrainian army had huge losses, there is also a video, where a bunch of wounded and killed Ukrainian fighters are lying around, there is a bunch of videos of captured Ukrainians, who, like the entire army of Paulus, for some reason were not executed, and of course no one will talk about these videos, because the Russians are not people , you know. But they do not show us this, because otherwise it will turn out that ... Oh, the Ukrainian army suffered a huge defeat, and not because “the Red Army men fled in hundreds to the machine guns in Stalingrad and the Germans ran out of ammunition.” Stop believing in Western propaganda. At the same time, where is the objectivity, it is shown how the Ukrainians repel unsuccessful attacks of the Russian army in detail, and even individual “victories”, but the failures of the Ukrainians are not shown, why did the Ukrainians retreat, how did such a breakthrough happen? "Retreated to stronger positions", "had to retreat". The only thing missing is news about the "bangs" that the Ukrainian military heard when the bombs landed, which did not bomb the retreating Ukrainian columns (which, by the way, is also a lie, there are geolocations of the strikes, anyone who followed the map knows this, the Ukrainians were unable to secretly bring out anything, everyone on the retreat road was bombed with everything possible, including the FPV drones of the Russian army) How did the breakthrough happen in this place, the Ukrainians have such modern (no) Bradley equipment? Who needs this objectivity. banderovites are executed in the same way as the Red Army executed SS soldiers on the spot, it is completely normal to kill Ukrainian fascists. If you've watched enough Ukrainian propagandists that the Russians are "fascists", you just need to look at the flag of the 114th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade and compare it with the flag that the Russians put on the Reichstag in 1945. The Red Army is the strongest of all, eternal glory to the soldiers of the Red Army who died in the war for the salvation of humanity! Fascism will be destroyed everywhere - in Ukraine (2014-20..), or in Germany (1933-1945), or in Poland (1926-1939), or in Latvia (1934-1940), or in Japan (1936-1945) and etc, it does not matter where it is, Socialism will defeat fascism everywhere, Lenin and communism will defeat, and the workers the whole world to free itself forever from the yoke, the eternal exploitation of capital, and in Russia too we will destroy capitalism! Russians will never surrender, the Red Army will always win!

[@c_c_pants9539]

>a cope wall of text of russian state approved slop of pseudohistory and delusions I hope they paid you well, Chang. >while the entire NATO bloc with the USA, Great Britain, France, Germany cannot supply shells to Ukraine yeah, West has fallen, now go ahead attack NATO :) 3 days to Washington, amirite? >Russians will never surrender uhm sweetie they surrendered Kherson (a forever russian city btw) as well as parts of Kursk oblast (rightful Ukie clay btw) >Ukrainian army had huge losses yeah 6 gorillion hohols died there but due to satanic black magic they just respawn is HATO underground bases >Russia too we will destroy capitalism careful now cumrade, dont let russian oligharchs hear you otherwise you will fall out of the window Overall its a solid script you got there ngl

[@vladikp765]

Good job 👍

[@tomspeed3354]

Thanks

[@TheWarArchive]

Thank you for your support!

[@DNG12900]

Okay that's a lot of casualties

[@fledweather]

Ukraine got clapped in Avdiivka and this bloke only shows Russian losses... Pretty good analysis but pretty biased as well.

[@mr.alpharius6409]

the USSR got clapped in Stalingrad but this guy only shows German losses smh!

[@fledweather]

@@mr.alpharius6409 weird comparison

[@paparazi8181]

сразу видно что предвзятый канал

[@Xycomm]

Anything that doesn’t affirm what you believe is biased lmao.

[@KC.edits1]

@@Xycommnot showing losses on one sides is indeed biased it’s a good video nonetheless he also said Russians used meat waves when there’s no evidence, there’s a bit of ridiculous things he said

[@9iht6ihgt43rzhijj]

​​@@Xycomm you can say it to yourself and take a moment to think about it...

[@rossgeller422]

Consider nowdays its not anymore JUST ONE TOWN according to BBC expert

[@KRKRK-sr4cx]

Do you guys think War Archive intentionally says bs to bait russian shills into leaving comments and increase the traction this video gets in the algorithm? Doesn't help that this guy doesn't cite his sources, like, anywhere.

[@JeffGordon-ph4vz]

Well how many times can you say “Russians take hundreds of losses” before it sounds fake and how do you claim Russia took more losses during the Ukrainian counter offensive in summer 2023 even though the Russians were in the defense, dug in, firepower advantage, and even manpower advantage (on the defense might I add) air superiority completely ignoring your own logic of Russia takes more losses BECAUSE they are on the attack. Keep the same logic.

[@galactic-guy]

​@@JeffGordon-ph4vz When did Russia ever have air superiority?

[@JeffGordon-ph4vz]

@@galactic-guy it still has air superiority. But im particularly talking about Ukraine summer offensive. Ukraine was using Tactics that only work with major air support something they dont have.

[@galactic-guy]

@@JeffGordon-ph4vz Neither side has ever had air superiority! Air superiority means "the degree to which a side in a conflict holds control of air power over opposing forces".

[@JeffGordon-ph4vz]

@@galactic-guy h

[@TWhite-uw5dl]

Your videos are good at getting an overview of the battle but holy cow do you lean heavy into Ukrainian propaganda for some of these details of the battle… it gets to the point that it’s ridiculous and even laughable at times.

[@credecarter8429]

I wanna be a T-90M TC really bad

[@erikholm8918]

you always has been

[@BaxJC]

Haven't watched this channel for a while and came back and ur subscribers doubled congrats you deserve it

[@Echo_-tx9ve]

Before I start watching this I know it's gonna be a rough one.

[@ВладГусельников-ы1щ]

Это нормально, что ты не хочешь верить в проблемы и ошибки своей стороны. Мне тоже иногда тяжело их принимать и видеть. Однако самообман просто напросто может привести к катастрофе. Что мы и видим на фронте. Украина бы не откатилась до Покровска, если бы не совершала ошибки.

[@LadnoDopustim2]

Так он просто пропогандист, что вы ожидали? Многие англоязычные зрители хейтят его за проукраинскую предвзятость (хотя по тому, как он называет населенные пункты можно понять, что он сам с незалежной)

[@Enkilov]

Украина бы при любых обстоятельствах откатилась бы до Покровска, т.к. её противник десятикратно сильнее. А ошибки и проблемы - естественны, ибо не ошибается только тот, кто ничего не делает.

[@monkas1833]

Bot factories must be working overshift again, damn

[@junalbinotv1196]

UKRAINE Already lost when Russians captured Bakhmut

[@andriianashovam7070]

How come?

[@sSqh_TheReal]

Finnaly! A new video!

[@patrickazzarella6729]

The amount of losses Russia took is absolutely insane over 1200 visually confirmed vehicle/equipment losses in about 5-6 months to 200 Ukrainian

[@Yuritarkov]

usually those same losses end up being recovered and repaired and sent again so a lot of the equipment losses end up becoming losses again until they actually get blown to bits

[@Randominternetvidz]

@@Yuritarkovthat is true, but no Ukrainians legit blow all equipment till its into bits, people always ask why they use suicide drones to blow up empty tanks. Their used for that exact reason 😊

[@svinche2]

The MOST IMPORTANT is the loss of people who lose more and Ukrainians lost Soldiers in thousands every day ! Considering that Russia have Absolute supremacy in firepower, from Glide bombs, ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, artillery , drones and everything else - vs - Ukrainian supremacy in sole number of Conscripts. Ukrainians lose every day so much live force, live people the Resource which they can't conscript indefinitely ... which means Ukrainians are doomed in long turn !!!

[@Yuritarkov]

@@Randominternetvidz the greatest irony is that every russian casualty that wasn't a KIA ended up returning to the field to become again WIA until actually becoming KIA or rotated out

[@МаксимЯнушкевич-ы3б]

​@@YuritarkovБудто у Украины как-то иначе:) Им то вообще париться не надо, кого-то лечить, целое Стадо перед ТЦК открыто для перемалывания.

[@krebgurfson5732]

31:18 shows how important seeing the other guy first is. in ww2 us vs german tank battles were won and lost based on just that.

[@drifterer103]

The Russians did an outstanding job conquering this stronghold which was heavily defended. They are the most experienced country in modern war right now. Unfortunately, the commentator is quite the fan of Ukrainian regime seems like. Very one sided.

[@BlackSkyTrooper]

Ukraine defender with many brigades and regiment is combat ineffective. This causes AFU is in deep trouble with gap between war of attrition and war of getting meat grinders (force conscript).

[@Henrique-qt4fq]

Why regime bro? Ins't the kremlin a regime by default?

[@diegosalazar550]

The owner of the channel is from Ukraine, once you get past the propaganda he pushes his content is quite enjoyable.

[@sircatangry5864]

Sure, marching forward into enemy positions requires so much experience in combat

[@piseag458]

rus bots complain cos they have no shame being in violation of the UN charter article 2 (4)

[@miltonpeter1295]

So according to the video maker: Russia gained the city but Ukraine had no losses. What a joke. How biased can someone be.

[@andriianashovam7070]

According to your post you are rather stupid person. Because ruzzia gained ground with losses, Ukraine has lost ground with losses. We both don't know more or less reliable figures of losses so far. But the equipment losses could be estimated more precisely.

[@matrixcraft8614]

Great Video

[@DarjeelingEnjoyer]

For a comment section that is so full of people who claim to be "Neutral", there sure are a lot of people using the Russian name for Avdiivka and then repeating Russian talking points. Almost like you guys aren't "Neutral". You just want to see a Pro-Russian youtuber and mad that this guy is Ukrainian.

[@LadnoDopustim2]

Bruh. Avdiivka has no other name. Victim UNIAN

[@GenericName43]

Pro ukropig admits the failure of the summer counter offensive. Pro ruzzia doubles down and spazzes out upon the sight of vulhedar and the second kharkiv offensive.