Battlefield 1 | How NOT to use the Farquhar Hill Storm

[@NicktheLongman]

If your iron sight is over the enemy and you pull the trigger, it should hit, I don't care how fast you're pulling the trigger. Missing an explicitly on-target shot is the kind of shit you fire the devs for implementing.

[@Hugo-ux2rf]

I somehow have 2 service stars on this gun doing this exact shit, so your mileage may vary. I also have roughly 247 minutes on it.

[@Cross31415]

2 service stars in 4 hours? Checks out for doing it wrong. XD

[@Hugo-ux2rf]

@@Cross31415 idk man I have like at least 200 ping all the time so I don't even bother aiming half the time

[@thiagovinicius6150]

RANDOM BULLET DEVIATION is shit

[@N0S0R0G312]

Indeed it is. But, that's not the case with this specific gun. For reference, try 1906. You can fire it as fast as your finger allows you to, on the run, and you will still be putting bullet to bullet. Farquhar just a really, really bad weapon.

[@Melancholy308]

literally a skill issue and a logical mechanic that is intended in the game. he is shooting too fast - in real life, it would result in the same issue. if you're shooting that fast, you will no longer keep the rifle steady and deviate off the target. if you guys want to always shoot where you point your crosshair without using your brain - go play some COD :D i understand its not what everybody likes but its literally just how the mechanics work in the game. just shoot a little slower and every bullet hits. pretty simple

[@Foddeur]

Which is indeed what I was referring to the in the description with "Local man confused why BF1 SLR has high spread specifically when he hits the 'fire' button as quickly as he can"

[@Melancholy308]

@@Foddeur ah sorry mate i didnt read the description, i was referring mainly to the people below in the comment section who kept crying about the mechanics haha.

[@Foddeur]

@@Melancholy308 Yeah, I mean I can understand the viewpoint but for me I'm fine with the mechanics and how they give each weapon their own 'personality', as it were!

[@N0S0R0G312]

That's not your fault. It's just a shitty rifle, really. I got so much butt hurt trying to level it up. If you are shooting faster then 1 shot/ 2 seconds, you will not hit enything. Yes, it's just very bad gun. Some potential for close quarters, but even there it's not as good as automatic rifles.

[@Hugo-ux2rf]

Just use the Howell Automatic imo, exact same damage pattern and fire rate but you get 1 more bullet and a bipod

[@Nauta_]

Farquhar Hill is mediocre at worst, if you think this is a bad gun than you just don't know how to use self-loading guns in this game

[@N0S0R0G312]

@@Nauta_ no, it's a shit of a gun which is bad at everything. There is no reason to waste your time on this joke of a gun, even Kolibri got more potential to kill someone. You want to kill fast? 1917 You want lazer accuracy? 1906 You want to suppress? 1907 Justcan examples, but all this guns kill the enemy, unlike garbage-farquhar.

[@N0S0R0G312]

@@Nauta_ no, it's a shit of a weapon which is bad at everything. There is no reason to waste your time on this joke of a gun, even Kolibri got more potential to kill someone. You want to kill fast? 1917 You want lazer accuracy? 1906 You want to suppress? 1907 Just an examples, but all this guns kill the enemy, unlike garbage-farquhar.

[@Nauta_]

@@N0S0R0G312 I agree that Farquhar doesn't particularly stand out in rpm or btk but it is very balanced out gun with low recoil. Also all slrs in game have identical accuracy stats with miniscule difference so saying that Farquhar is inaccurate is nonsense.