This video looks primarily at brigade and divisional howitzer artillery in the Russian Army. If you'd like a video on other types of artillery, like regimental howitzers or rocket artillery, leave a comment!
@VagabondZeroSix3 жыл бұрын
Yes, please.
@magnagermania93113 жыл бұрын
Yeah, something about the bundeswehr, thegerman army, would be much appreciated!
@goncalofferreira3313 жыл бұрын
Yes, please.
@DanialTarik3 жыл бұрын
video on Indian Artillery
@HilmiIsa3 жыл бұрын
Sure,why not? 😊
@oxidelicious56453 жыл бұрын
Excellent content as always. It's nice to see how non-NATO forces are organizing their units and you're one of the best sources on youtube for that kind of stuff.
@menacereconnaissance74063 жыл бұрын
without a doubt
@arthas6403 жыл бұрын
It's fun seeing how other countries do it since so many countries either purposefully or inadvertently copy NATO in many ways thanks to cultural influence, foreign training, or lack of modern combat experience
@arthas6403 жыл бұрын
@Kenneth Johnson at what point did anyone state that? You need to be subtle with your snuck premise, you cant just drop it like a turd in a swimming pool.
@Mader_Levap2 жыл бұрын
@Kenneth Johnson Ahh, self-admitted spammer and nutter. Go away.
@davidh.69302 жыл бұрын
This aged like milk xD
@CallsignYukiMizuki3 жыл бұрын
I never realized how complicated the process of calling in a fire mission is. I've always thought its a FO talking to a Platoon commander, but nope there's an entire chain to it
@Sol_Invictus5103 жыл бұрын
Especially with all the deconfliction that needs to be considered these days. Between air and the always reliable host nation forces, it seems there’s a lot of room for procedures to be implemented.
@oxygenenjoyer13 жыл бұрын
I had a friend who was a forward observer in Afghanistan for a year and one time he went through the entire fire support request operation with 2 of us and yeah, it's way more complicated than what you see in movies.
@burningsinner11323 жыл бұрын
You should consider the fact that in Russia, there are a lot of levels of artillery on different chains of command. MSTA-S uses long chain, Peony requires high command autorization for special payload, but stuff like Akatsiya is infantry-level, belongs to the unit it rolls with and bossed around on same level as any BMP it reinforces.
@nickkorkodylas50053 жыл бұрын
Depends on how many fucks you give. In Checnhya blind shots are fair game.
@burningsinner11323 жыл бұрын
@@nickkorkodylas5005 There is no "Chechnya" when it comes to artillery. There is only YVO ("Yuzhniy Voennyi Okrug", Southern Military district).
@Cain-x3 жыл бұрын
The animations that went along with the explanation of tactics used is AMAZING. Please continue to do this.
@extrabytes71913 жыл бұрын
There are two types of people, artillerymen and targets (Yes I will comment slightly relevant wargame quotes whenever I can)
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
Seem on-brand
@stanisawnielepkowicz18813 жыл бұрын
Or "Artillery ads dignity, to what would otherwise be an ugly brawl" which I find very funny since it's the artillery that takes away all the dignity from any kind of fights.
@roguevirus3 жыл бұрын
It's not MY war.
@yuval56283 жыл бұрын
Two jobs, grunts and support.
@TheTrueAdept3 жыл бұрын
@@stanisawnielepkowicz1881 That is attributed to Fredrick der Grosse (Fredrick the Great/Fredrick the Second) of Prussia. ;)
@datubangkas99083 жыл бұрын
"God is on the side with the best artillery" -Napoleon Bonaparte
@inkognitou69823 жыл бұрын
False quote - Napoleon never said anything like that.
@RedboRF3 жыл бұрын
@@inkognitou6982 you definitely followed Napoleon his entire life, 24/7
@andershoel783 жыл бұрын
Say that to Suvorov. Who beated Mcdonald in Napoleons army in northern Italy. (After passing the alpes on foot) He never losed a battle.
@RedboRF3 жыл бұрын
@@andershoel78 can confirm. and actually he invented the battalion (column) tactics, which Napoleon took / adopted from him. most underrated general in entire history.
@andershoel783 жыл бұрын
@@RedboRF Even Hitler copied his organisation and taktics. His parrents was from Sweden, under the name Suvor, in Russia it became Suvorov. And its also explane why its named the great fatherland war in Russia, and not WW1 and WW2. It was a way for the rojal families in europe, to try to take back power from the communists, thru Hitler. One other thing history dont mention, is there was a lot of Swedes that imigrated east in this time.
@sohrabroozbahani47003 жыл бұрын
Did anybody else notice we just received a crash course into artillery warfare here? Napoleon be proud... I think I learned in under 10 minutes way more than my entire life to this point...
@markusz44473 жыл бұрын
I guess if Napoleon would have had the 152mm howitzers, he'd won at waterloo haha
@TheAdriyaman3 жыл бұрын
Too bad you wont be needing the information unless you're a battery commander
@firstconsul72862 жыл бұрын
@@markusz4447 If he had good howitzers at all, Wellington's backslope would have meant nothing.
@HW.00293 жыл бұрын
Other militaries : Sir, we must locate the enemy in the target area and destroy it! Russians : Sir why not destroy THE target area?
@tando62663 жыл бұрын
Laughs in Donetsk airport
@PyromaN933 жыл бұрын
-Do you see grid sqare sergeant? -Yes. -I don't want it. *TOS-1 angry noises*
@elusive61193 жыл бұрын
@@tando6266 240мм
@vladimirtherussian1663 жыл бұрын
@@tando6266 lmao so true
@chieftainofthemoroccosindi16853 жыл бұрын
@@PyromaN93 Tos-2*
@MaxwellAerialPhotography3 жыл бұрын
>Talks about nuclear artillery shells >shows Kyiv >ok Vladimir.
@MonMalthias3 жыл бұрын
*Azov battalion flying swastika and NATO flags* *Sacred War anthem intensifies*
@venomsoul11473 жыл бұрын
@@MonMalthias Hell, i hope not!
@MonMalthias3 жыл бұрын
@@venomsoul1147 The coup regime in Kyiv should stop revising its history to teach lessions lionising the Galician Nazi collaborators then! Village burners, rapists, torturers the lot of them. And those neo-Nazi paramilitaries should be disbanded and disarmed, if not arrested. Particularly Azov.
@ВладиславВладислав-и4ю3 жыл бұрын
@@venomsoul1147 do not listen to him, he talks about Ukrainian punishers, hiding behind the backs of civilians, placing his artillery in the courtyards of Donetsk residents, shooting down civilian planes. And yes, Bandera was against the Nazis and the Communists, in contrast to the Russian General Vlasov with 300k to the army of Nazi associates.
@venomsoul11473 жыл бұрын
@@ВладиславВладислав-и4ю And so? Bandera has third-class person without any achivments. Vlasov has just traitor. No one better of those. Dont known pro-vlasov forces exist anywhere today. Answer me please, why Berlin hasnt notes about battles aganist oun-upa? And lisen, you mean some civil-war forces better than others? I asume any modern war - just cash investment, no-matter-wthat-cost. Just dig to beneficiaries.
@rickv91803 жыл бұрын
GRAU: How many hwitzers would you like Comrade Shoigu? Russian MoD: *YeS*
@chieftainofthemoroccosindi16853 жыл бұрын
Read about new - Coalition-SV
@altxodorednovember69203 жыл бұрын
@worldoftancraft не ГРУ, а ГРАУ. Или русский язык не родной?
@BarendJan3 жыл бұрын
I think your best video so far. Just awesome. Would love to see similar videos on American and Chinese artillery and then maybe to conclude the series an overview of similarities, differences, strengths and weaknesses. Once again, awesome content!
@SebastianvonGrunf3 жыл бұрын
It's said that the artillery is the king of the battlefield, and infantry is the queen. We all know what king does to the queen..
@Someone-jz5pl3 жыл бұрын
It pounds her
@personbob86913 жыл бұрын
@@Someone-jz5pl can u not say that pls
@mochiisntbad67623 жыл бұрын
@@personbob8691 TIME FOR SOME GROUND POUNDING - A Vtuber
@elusive61193 жыл бұрын
"Artillery is the god of war," said French General Jean Batiste Vaquet de Griboval. Especially 203mm with nuclear shells, you can't hide, you can't protect yourself. If they are closer than 40 km, just run, but you will still just die already tired. Artillery is not only 152-mm, but also 122-mm self-propelled amphibious guns. And 120-240-mm mortars, which are capable of throwing a 100-kiloton mine directly into your trench. If you can't knock them out first, you're already dead. And you can't, because there are too many air defense systems there. You can't suppress them with your artillery, because you haven't had anything like this for a long time, you relied too much on aviation.
@lancereyes56453 жыл бұрын
@@mochiisntbad6762 **hic**
@TheIntox233 жыл бұрын
The little Pacman icon for the Mess section is adorable, an I want it to be a real thing
@GeneralCalculus3 жыл бұрын
It's real. Or at least it's included in list about/of tactical symbols I've sitting in my computer
@DzinkyDzink3 жыл бұрын
I was a loader on Msta-S in 2013-2014 and I learned more about the organizational structure in this video than in 1.5 years of service!
@Kon_Chen_i3 жыл бұрын
You turned out in disbat or very often on guba? Coz since 2008 time of service is one year.
@vasiliynikiforov19763 жыл бұрын
@@Kon_Chen_i probably he's peace da ball.
@vasiliynikiforov19763 жыл бұрын
Or was kicked out of contract ))
@Kon_Chen_i3 жыл бұрын
@@vasiliynikiforov1976 с контракта уйти та ещё проблема. Скорее первый вариант.
@vasiliynikiforov19763 жыл бұрын
@@Kon_Chen_i с контракта могут вышвырнуть за неподобающее поведение. Не так ли? )
@alanch903 жыл бұрын
One of your best videos so far. Congrats
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
I appreciate it!
@vinegar95663 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, exactly what i need at 9pm.
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@jakesamson54893 жыл бұрын
Tactical nukes are my second favorite kind, after recreational.
@sovietred73713 жыл бұрын
The difference between NATO and Russian nukes Russia wants to use small yield nukes to figh against enemy infantry units, where Nato wants to use it to blow up civilian populations, hence why Russia said "fine, I make biggest nuke then"
@bryanmartinez66003 жыл бұрын
@@sovietred7371 funny how they halved the size of the Tzar Bomba and it still spooked them.
@obscureoccultist91583 жыл бұрын
@@sovietred7371 I don't know why your trying to differentiate between tactical and strategic nukes. Tactical nukes are just as fully capable of wiping out large civilian population centers like any other strategic nuclear warhead. The main difference between strategic and tactical nukes are its dispersal system. Tactical nukes are deployed on the divisional level. Strategic nukes are deployed at the strategic level with heavy involvement in its deployment by the national government.
@mrreziik10 ай бұрын
At this point in time shoigu and gerasimov still knew where the ammo was
@hothoploink15093 жыл бұрын
Seems like the perfect video to ask a repeated question: Where did part 2 of the soviet artillery in ww2 video go? Will it be back?
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
The arguments in it were flawed so I unlisted it.
@TheAdronio3 жыл бұрын
@@BattleOrder Do you have a list of which arguments were flawed and in what way? It would be very interesting to learn from that.
@konstantinkrylov3213 жыл бұрын
Great job. Keep up!
@ФедяКрюков-в6ь3 жыл бұрын
Good video, but not 100% precise. Firstly, any battery has an organic supply section of two to three trucks (I've forgot exact number). Second, battery commander has a direct link with his battery FDC, he don't really need a battalion commander to translate his orders to his own battery. If a battery in a direct support with a company, the battery CP is only translating his orders to the battalion CP to keep it informed of it's actions, ammo comsumption and overall intelligence, and receive orders from it in case of, say, immediate concentrated fire of the battalion. Generally it's depends on plan of artillery employment which is called a fire plan (it's beyond the scope of just some preliminary barrages)
@aleksandrhellgate73963 жыл бұрын
Ты чё тут барабанишь? Эх..
@ФедяКрюков-в6ь3 жыл бұрын
@@aleksandrhellgate7396 Эта хуйня еще в рассекреченных американских мануалах 80х годов про советскую армию написана, блогеры их просто сами не читают. Тоже мне блджад военная тайна
@aleksandrhellgate73963 жыл бұрын
@@ФедяКрюков-в6ь Ну и что? Барабанишь то, зачем? Типа в надежде, что по головке погладят? Мол: Гуд Теодор, гуд!
@namesurname6243 жыл бұрын
Amazing production quality, and good info. Great job!
@dtryorva6033 жыл бұрын
Очень интересно и крайне наглядно. Лайк. Однако слабо раскрыто присутствие и работа реактивной артиллерии, которая занимает не меньшее значение в российской военной доктрине. Странно видеть, что на дистанциях более 40 км используются тактические ракеты, так как там все ещё можно использовать ракетную артиллерию.
@АндрейИнкогнитов3 жыл бұрын
Это просто ошибка автора.
@ПетрВрангель-т8п3 жыл бұрын
Автор западник, а потому ошибки, неточная или исковерканная информация и банальная ложь будут присутствовать в обязательном порядке.
@ИванИванченко-с9т3 жыл бұрын
Отличное видео. Автор ВСЕ правильно показал. Автор ВСЕ правильно понимает. Автор правильно думает. Пусть так и будет... Пока противник рисует карты, мы меняем ландшафты...
@АндрейИнкогнитов3 жыл бұрын
@@ИванИванченко-с9т 🤗
@aleksandrhellgate73963 жыл бұрын
Он как раз о ствольной артиллерии говорил. Про реактивную обещает рассказать если комментов понапишут. А так то грамотный автор
@therealpavuk44143 жыл бұрын
That feel when foreign youtuber makes videos about russian army better than our own youtubers and even TV-channels) add russian subtitles please)
@user-vl3wo8ts1k2 жыл бұрын
at 04:08 of the video this man have a shot of Russian artillery dropping tactical nuke on a Kiev... the video is dated 27 aug 2021 ... this man had deep understanding way in advance ... visionary.
@iplaygames8090 Жыл бұрын
Or he simply was up tp date with happening. The war in ukraine isnt new, it was happening since 2014.
@Tinblitz3 жыл бұрын
The quality and graphics of this video are great, by the way. And the footage is always helpful for visualisation.
@lukacsnemeth16522 жыл бұрын
4:06 tactical nuking Kyiv before it was cool.
@commandergeokam28682 жыл бұрын
hand down the best video in its kind i want to see more like this
@demphotiou3 жыл бұрын
Fantastic job as always
@pjviitas2 жыл бұрын
Amazing documentary....I was an infantry guy and never thought alot about artillery but your segment explains their roll perfectly....thanks
@shandorno63053 жыл бұрын
Moar artillery! This is both a request for you to do more videos on modern artillery, as well as just a general sentiment.
@P4Tri0t4203 жыл бұрын
I served in a German Panzerhaubitze 2000 and its safely to say that this Beast is right at his high Position in the SPA Ranking
@user_arbuser_013 жыл бұрын
Imho, it is the best self-propelled howitzer in the world on this moment. 👍
@Daurentius3223 жыл бұрын
@@user_arbuser_01 Actually the best hardware is not the one which costs the most or which takes the longest to produce. The best hardware is the hardware which has an acceptable effectiveness but can be mass produced at such an exponential rate where for every piece your adversary assembles, you assemble 10. So yeah, Russian SPGs are not the best, but who cares if you have only 20 top notch SPGs having to face 200-400 more than okay SPGs? Hence why Russian hardware is so lethal, not because it is the best, but because of the amount the Russians possess.
@MegaBanne Жыл бұрын
Doesn't get close to the Archer system lol.
@MegaBanne Жыл бұрын
@@Daurentius322 That is such cope lol. That is why they are being destroyed in the hundreds by CAESAR and Archer systems as I am writing this comment. lol.
@klaush3351 Жыл бұрын
The germans make with the PZH 2000 the same mistake as with the Tiger tank in WW II: to complicated, to much repair intense and to build only in low numbers. What is the sense if one tiger can kill 5-10 T-34, but the russians had tens of thousands of them and the germans had maybe 2.500 tigers. The most of them not shot by T-34, but broke down by mechanical issues, lack of gasolin or enemies artillerie fire. Same problem today with PZH 2000 and many other western weapon systems. Take a look at the experiences with PZH 2000 in Ukraine. Then you know, where the issues are.
@tyn62112 жыл бұрын
So basically, with air superiority and heavy artillery, you get Donbass August 2022. An absolute meat grinder.
@peterdonlon20832 жыл бұрын
More like lack of air superiority
@hello-ii5lh2 жыл бұрын
@@peterdonlon2083 source: ukraine
@mycure0498 Жыл бұрын
@@hello-ii5lh That didn’t age well.
@RazorsharpLT Жыл бұрын
@@hello-ii5lh Aged like milk, vatnik Made a clown of yourself for all to see. Honk honk 🤡
@quik478 Жыл бұрын
It appears they DO have superiority in air now. Howeveer Russian involvement in pre-2022 Donbas was really one sided on artillery, you can see shit tone of pics with burned ukrainian columns.
@mailman354193 жыл бұрын
Also bit of information for the video poster. The US no longer uses the copperhead round. We still have them in inventory and storage(cause we bought a lot but they're just sitting there) But they proved to be risky. At times they could not distinguish between which end of the laser guiding it was the observer or target. And we've nearly killed our own observers with it. So we no longer use laser guided rounds.
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
I am aware. I mentioned the Copperhead because that’s what the Krasnopol’s guidance is like
@mailman354193 жыл бұрын
@@BattleOrder my bad then. Carry on!
@aps1253 жыл бұрын
US Army has a new anti armor 155mm terminal guided projectile called Bonus. Think it as a modern version of copperhead. You can check it out from BAE official KZbin channel: kzbin.info/www/bejne/d6HSiqJueNenn7s
@hjorturerlend3 жыл бұрын
@@aps125 Bonus was first adopted in 2000 by the Swedes and French, not exactly brand new. Bonus is an end-phase IR guided AT shell, it's not a laser-guided shell like Krasnopol or Copperhead.
@aps1253 жыл бұрын
@@hjorturerlend Bonus MK2 entered US service just two years ago. The new variant has both IR and laser seekers to boost the kill rate. The sensor fused warhead contains two EPF submunitions to defeat AFV
@snarf94553 жыл бұрын
This is a lot of good level intel, I learned a lot.
@cheekybreeky15073 жыл бұрын
Потрясающая работа, спасибо!
@apoleonschneider3 жыл бұрын
Now we need artillery analysis of NATO countries. Great job!
@spencerstevens21752 жыл бұрын
Just look at Ukraine vs Russia. Now imagine an actual NATO fighting force there. It wouldnt be pretty for Russia.
@apoleonschneider2 жыл бұрын
@@spencerstevens2175 it's said that nato doesn't have numbers anywhere near to what the Russians field. They compensate (or overcompensate) with air power.
@spencerstevens21752 жыл бұрын
@@apoleonschneider its sad you still believe everything you read about the Russian military
@wgoulding3 жыл бұрын
Great job as always!
@eliqfor13 жыл бұрын
Dear Battle Order - very much enjoyed your video , thank you .Minor suggestion on pronounsaiton the system is not called "musta" it is m'stA .Admitedly an awkward word even for russian speakers , it is an old slavic word for vengance and name of some river .
@38Kilo3 жыл бұрын
Nice, I wonder what river... something in ww2 I would have to say
@ahoosifoou42113 жыл бұрын
Amazing editing my guy. I struggle with presentations and i appreciate your skills.
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
Thanks mate
@GLA7413 жыл бұрын
Finally! A video/content creator that shows a diagram of how a Artillery unit is organized, its job, and how a battle order would work (pun not intended) other youtuber with the same content that I Have seen usually verbally speak it out with little or no diagram. But here you highlighted how it work and I like that as im a very visual learner! You earned yourself a subscriber! Im check your channel for video over Nato Artillery units and both Nato and non Nato tank units! Thank you! It only took years for YT algorithm to recommend your channel on my feed 🤣 should have done it soon, but also my curiosity too, im very picky and judge a video of its Thumbnail! To many of those fake "real US military news" channels if you know what I mean, using a computerzied robotic narrator! Makes me reluctant to try new channels, but again yours is great, different, and actually put work into it and research. Not hastily produced with fake or inaccurate facts/thumbnails for the sole purpose of only likes and subs!
@patrikcath10252 жыл бұрын
4:06 foreshadowing?
@pegzounet3 жыл бұрын
Active radio jammers in an artillery shell ? Wow, that's all kinds of nasty. they really do take electronic warfare seriously.
@pegzounet2 жыл бұрын
Yep...
@forrestgreene11392 жыл бұрын
They also didn't take training, professionalism,and morality seriously.
@spencerstevens21752 жыл бұрын
Yea too bad they dont take arming their actual soldiers as serious
@firasajoury7813 Жыл бұрын
@@forrestgreene1139who exactly the nato forces and their La lies in Afghanistan and Iraq ?
@ethanyang94303 жыл бұрын
Nice work! Can you do one on modern German armoured forces, by any chance?
@qarmatianwarhorse60282 жыл бұрын
Terrible day to have this recommended.
@miroslavkandra2391 Жыл бұрын
This video was so good. A lot of very good information
@TrangleC2 жыл бұрын
When you don't have an all powerful airforce, you need artillery. The German army used to field a lot of artillery too. They had a ratio of 1 artillery battalion for each 2 regular (Tanks & Mechanized Infantry) battalions, during the Cold War. Of course that was one of the first things to go when they made that idiotic shift towards a "peace keeping and nation building" army in the 90s. It will be interesting to see whether they will go back to something more sensible and capable now that they announced that they would "re-arm".
@spencerstevens21752 жыл бұрын
Ahh yes this aged well
@bigbrother7405 Жыл бұрын
Well it did the Russians have given up on mobile BTGs and switched to mass artilleey firepower
@mycure0498 Жыл бұрын
@@bigbrother7405 Until it didn’t
@ducking_fonkey Жыл бұрын
Ah yes, it aged well.
@maximilianodelrio Жыл бұрын
Yeah, Russian artillery has battered Ukrainian units
@stanisawnielepkowicz18813 жыл бұрын
Do you have any plans for videos on rather "minor" nations like Poland, Hungary or Ukraine? I really enjoyed the video with Swedish army and personally would love to see video on the Polish army.
@PewPewPlasmagun3 жыл бұрын
Tbh there is not much to talk about. The major powers have more stuff and tech.
@JoinMeInDeathBaby3 жыл бұрын
+1
@stanisawnielepkowicz18813 жыл бұрын
@@PewPewPlasmagun well, videos on Japanese and Swedish armies have quite a lot of views. Also Battle Order doesn't make videos about military equipment and tech, I would like to see how smaller armies operate in general strategy, tactics etc. If anything the bigger nations are boring because of how many videos were made on them. For example Polish army has combination of western and eastern equipment and I'd like to see how it is used in combat.
@renegadeone94793 жыл бұрын
No videos on Indian armed forces till now.
@renegadeone94793 жыл бұрын
Surprised to see no videos on French as well. On level of Japan and Sweden, we can talk of Israel and Turkey as well.
@PytonPagom3 жыл бұрын
Love the detail you go into in your videos !
@ВенцлавТальмберг3 жыл бұрын
In sniper duel on 2km distance and more wins artillery
@ramilv739Ай бұрын
You need to cover Russian/Soviet Piping forces. They literally lay fuel pipes behind the advancing front. They are primary reason Soviets had little fuel supply issues in Afghanistan
@fredlandry61703 жыл бұрын
Stalin is quoted as saying artillery is the God of war.
@sergeantklein60263 жыл бұрын
WOW Man that was very interesting You did your homework! Well done! Very informative and clear without boring me
@F1ghteR413 жыл бұрын
0:12 As an interesting sidenote, the old motto of Russian artillery was _Tuetur et terret_ - '[It] Preserves and Frightens'. 10:51 Harrasment fire is usually referred in Russian as беспокоящий огонь.
@89volvowithlazers Жыл бұрын
whther its an old vid or a new vid how you and your team produce such detail is off the charts- tbh I check your org tables before I read news about conflict overseas to be real- once I know the numbers and listen to the "top story" I can easily determine what is up so yeah u do really good stuff besides my pixel troopen military applications :)
@jimjames48753 жыл бұрын
This is awesome Thank you.
@tonnywildweasel81383 жыл бұрын
Always a good thing when you have Arti as your friend. Nice vid! Greets, T.
@calumdeighton3 жыл бұрын
This is very interesting the use of UAVs or drones with artillery. Interesting the things are being used and we have live proof or their use in combat. Wonder if our own forces, have such advanced thinking and utility for such technology.
@Apophis5443 жыл бұрын
Есть видео из Сирии, штурм Абу-Кемаль kzbin.info/www/bejne/pInMaGCpr92ijpY
@VT-mw2zb3 жыл бұрын
In an environment where the battlespace is heavily defended by Integrated Air Defence systems of all types, ranges, and guidance, drones and artillery maybe the only systems that can survive being shot at.
@johndaubner9732 жыл бұрын
Great stuff! Thanks for all the info.
@pabf27453 жыл бұрын
The maximum combat reach of the US artillery was 30 km with smart ammunition, maybe the"bad guys" are only out at that range, or they were unable to discover enemies at further range, but ayway, 30 km was the maximum US used combat range.
@chaosXP3RT3 жыл бұрын
Was the maximum range? Or is?
@chaosXP3RT3 жыл бұрын
What weapon systems are we talking about? The M777 or Paladin, or????
@jamesmerkel19322 жыл бұрын
The US ERCA sytem has a range of 70km...
@username_37152 жыл бұрын
erca with ramjet is going to reach 130 km lol
@Aatell7643 жыл бұрын
If anyone has played Tom Clancy's EndWar this is pretty much how I conducted my battles, air strikes aswell with forward riflemen observer platoons.
@nicholasstilley23702 жыл бұрын
10:05 omg is that a baofeng
@alaric_30152 жыл бұрын
the Chinese has infiltrated them
@imrekalman90442 жыл бұрын
Since I first watched this video I started using a 2S3M Akatsiya in War Thunder. It's not easy, armour is not existent, but it is fun for sure. Especially with the 3OF25 HE shell.
@RedboRF3 жыл бұрын
such a great video, thanks mate, and greetings form Russia.
@magnagermania93113 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to this, something about the german army next?
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
Got something on China scheduled next
@magnagermania93113 жыл бұрын
@@BattleOrder well, any of your content is much appreciated, high quality here. Thanks for your great vids!
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@PewPewPlasmagun3 жыл бұрын
German what now? Does not exist.
@magnagermania93113 жыл бұрын
@@shinchan-F-urmom what does that mean
@nothingtoseeheremovealong5982 жыл бұрын
That artillery has proven itself incredibly effective against civilian residential areas
@TheTeme612 жыл бұрын
According to who?
@topiasr6282 жыл бұрын
Russian artillery is second to none - at killing civilians
@alexburke18992 жыл бұрын
@@TheTeme61 you still don’t believe Russia is killing Ukrainians? What exactly are they showing y’all on tv over there lol. Try searching around KZbin while you guys are still allowed to.
@TheTeme612 жыл бұрын
@@alexburke1899 of course they are killing the nazis, what do you mean?
@alexburke18992 жыл бұрын
@@TheTeme61 don’t play dumb you know what the fascist Russians are doing in Ukraine, the Bucha videos is proof Putin and Russia is the new NaZis, also rape as they used in ww2. The world won’t forget this or even the fascist trolls that ran propaganda. Enjoy the sanctions
@simonloo15883 жыл бұрын
Nice video esp the battalion Organization structure …very clear
@AD-kg6yp3 жыл бұрын
If you feel being harassed in the office, think that in the field you can be harassed by 152 mm HE-FRAG shell.
@alexkrylewski3218 Жыл бұрын
Don't even need to imagine, lol. Also, 120mm mortar.
@jacc13b103 жыл бұрын
1st time i see this channel. Pretty much realistic explanation (Deserve abo absolutely)
@kasparvg2 жыл бұрын
4:05 Well, that one aged like milk...
@MaziarYousefi3 жыл бұрын
Very well explained, you're my new YT channel bro 👏🏻
@xatik88172 жыл бұрын
2:40 Oh come on, you used my town Sumy (Ukraine) as an example of Msta-S range. And you did it half a year before the war. At least I'm glad we kicked Russian asses from our town, so we've got that going for us.
@x-raygames96192 жыл бұрын
Wait, didn't they left city because of agreement? How did you "kicked their asses"?
@alexanderflemming67882 жыл бұрын
@@x-raygames9619 nope that is the biggest bs ever they left because the Ukrainians started to push them back away from Kyiv and could lead to an encirclement of forces as well as the terrible logistics and high loses.
@ВладиславВладислав-и4ю2 жыл бұрын
@@x-raygames9619 as you know, Hitler withdrew troops from Stalingrad under an agreement with the USSR. And from under Moscow, the troops were withdrawn of his good will.
@x-raygames96192 жыл бұрын
@@alexanderflemming6788 no, Sumy was city which was left according to agreement. Even on maps they moved forward from it on many kilometres so they couldn't be "kicked" from there. Apart from maps I use video of result of conversation between russian and ukranian diplomats. What source do you use? Can you share it?
@ВладиславВладислав-и4ю2 жыл бұрын
@@x-raygames9619 In fact, the Territorial Defense was organized before the war (just like the Soviet militia), so this is again cheap demagoguery. And your conjectures about the Jewish roots of Hitler should be confirmed by evidence, and not by the words of conspiracy theorists. As far as I remember, the Jew who was supposed to be Hitler's ancestor did not even exist.
@gihof8430 Жыл бұрын
Damn, I fell in love with your channel. Such a wonderful example of ruzzia apologists in the comments. Can't wait to read more in future videos, I hope you'd pick the same title and content for the next video. Popcorn is reserved for sure fella!
@lordexvar17542 жыл бұрын
this aged pretty well, russia finally getting into rhythm with the artillery phase of the war
@ThyRedCoats2 жыл бұрын
this comment didn't age well though...
@starstray4326 Жыл бұрын
@@ThyRedCoats how? the russians stopped columns of bradlys and leopards with mines and artillery
@ThyRedCoats Жыл бұрын
@@starstray4326 Yep... and now the wolves are at the gates of Moscow
@iplaygames8090 Жыл бұрын
@@ThyRedCoatsthe dog was barking at its owner and got kicked out the house.
@starstray4326 Жыл бұрын
@@ThyRedCoats with a coup that did nothing?
@CadreOps3 жыл бұрын
👍👍 Always look forward to seeing these presentations. Would you be able or interested, in doing a new video on Russian BTG/Battle Tactical Group? Considering current events, such info could prove very informative for many. Thank you for your time!
@supersarge243 жыл бұрын
Does russia have a heavy weapons team or some similar squad? I wonder how the AGS-30 is supposed to be deployed
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
AGS is a battalion weapon, I believe deployed as a platoon, whose sections are attached to motor rifle companies.
@supersarge243 жыл бұрын
@@BattleOrder Thank you, very interesting
@CruelDwarf3 жыл бұрын
Motor Rifle Battalion can have a AGS platoon of three sections with two launchers in each. Each section have its own BTR or BMP (depending on the type of motor rifle battalion) and usually is attached to each of the maneuver companies of the battalion. AGS platoon is rarely used together.
@Pythoner3 жыл бұрын
usually the NBC troops have the most terrifying infantry weapons (i.e. shmel flamethrowers); I forget what formation they can be attached in, maybe a company, but they're not present in every battalion and even brigade.
@Greis-BB3 жыл бұрын
@@Pythoner I'll tell you more. Bumblebees are generally absent in the overwhelming number of divisions. According to the state, they are available only to the troops of "Radiation, Chemical and Bacteriological Protection".
@WarpBeacon3 ай бұрын
You got a funny way of saying Msta :)
@WarpBeacon3 ай бұрын
You say it as "Moosta", but there's no oo. Just read it like M, like an M4 and then just STA.
@u.n.gaming33213 жыл бұрын
Modernised puma panzer grenadier divisions please
@thomasglessner60672 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the commentary.
@fidelismiles74393 жыл бұрын
Wargame players: WRITE THAT DOWN, WRITE THAT DOWN!
@MBTIinRealLife3 жыл бұрын
I don't get it. Please explain
@fidelismiles74393 жыл бұрын
@@MBTIinRealLife right so there is this game called: "Wargame: Red Dragon" it is a rts set in an alternate history where WW3 starts and you are in control of a 'Deck' from 2 factions (Bluefor vs Redfor) and its members. Each member/country has it's own Division and you get to choose Infantry, Support, Logistics, Recon, Vehicle, Helicopter, Air Force units. The Soviet Union is part of the Redfor faction and since it has a Support Tab, you can choose Artillery/MRLS/Mortars, etc so players who search guides look for tips and tricks regarding the use of the Support units, that's why I wrote "Write that down" because it isnt just a reference to Bob&Sponge but to the players (specially newbies) who are constantly learning on how to properly play Wargame:Red Dragon.
@fidelismiles74393 жыл бұрын
This video helps because it explains the realistic artillery doctrine Russia uses in real life so players might try to apply what was explained in this video in Wargame.
@februarywhiskeys3 жыл бұрын
I'm a new viewer and the sound effect at 8:33 sent my neurons firing.
@sundalongpinoy81003 жыл бұрын
*God is on the side with the best artillery.* *-Napoleon Bonaparte*
@GBERTS3 жыл бұрын
amazing video!
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@janchovanec86242 жыл бұрын
This aged in... devastating manner :-( Good content though.
@LooWa013 жыл бұрын
Very informative as usal
@cm2753 жыл бұрын
I just noticed on rewatch that the nuclear round hit Kyiv. Brutal.
@ЯБезымянный-о5ф3 жыл бұрын
Well, the only nation that successfuly survives 7 years of war with Russia, lmao
@no_importanto69663 жыл бұрын
@@ЯБезымянный-о5ф 🤣
@thomasmcevilly84711 ай бұрын
Great explanation thank you
@EasternVikingTradeCompanyJSC3 жыл бұрын
The newest are 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV, fully automated & up to 80km range firing
@Rothinger3 жыл бұрын
I would lime to see a material about RF Rocket artillery force and counter battery strategies/tactics.
@CA-kq9bh2 жыл бұрын
Great work! But I hope I will never see RUS forces displayed with milsymbols for "own/allied" forces again!
@lolololo29652 жыл бұрын
I wonder how much damage the nuclear round does to abrams if it directly lands on it
@dataman10002 жыл бұрын
The Koalitsiya-SV Range of fire with standard projectile is around 30 km and around 40 km with rocket-assisted projectile. A new long-range precision-guided round has been developed. It has a maximum range of 70 km. The Koalitsiya-SV KSh is also capable of firing older Krasnopol laser-guided munitions with a range of 20-25 km.
@aps1253 жыл бұрын
US army has a new super howitzer to enter service soon (planned for 2023) . M1299 SPH uses M109A7 chassis and gun cab but upgraded with a 58 caliber long gun barrel. with a super charge and new rocket assisted round it can hit targets beyond 70km. This new HE projectile also is compatible with PGK fuse to achieve near precision.
@Greis-BB3 жыл бұрын
The God-Emperor will not approve of your heretical admiration for the achievements of these dark mechanicals
@myopicthunder3 жыл бұрын
koalitsya goes out to 80km
@mosh.42453 жыл бұрын
Interesting that they don't have any organic AA other then the roof-mounted MG's.
@BattleOrder3 жыл бұрын
They do, their brigades have two whole anti-aircraft battalions in them. It just wasn't the focus of this video. The NSVT is basically like the air defense weapon to be mounted on armored vehicles.
@wgoulding3 жыл бұрын
It's likely a platoon or at least a few vehicles would be detached to cover the artillery.
@rustym.shackelford55463 жыл бұрын
@@BattleOrder The NSVT is only good against Helicopters. I would reckon the Russians have organic AA.
@Temeluchas3 жыл бұрын
Well, 3 "Tor" batteries (12 launcher) and 2 "Tunguska" batteries (also 12 vehicles) per brigade is quite a lot of AA. Basically, any organic AA besides MANPADs is redundant at this point. Moreover, it is a coomon practice when AA assets are in direct command of brigade artillery commander. Plus, there is a cost issue. A single "Tunguska" is more expensive than a full battery of Msta-S.
@metalmadsen2 жыл бұрын
Awesome video
@shovelenthusiast38882 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, this will come in handy...
@Puzzoozoo2 жыл бұрын
“Artillery adds dignity, to what would otherwise be an ugly brawl.” Frederick the Great
@danielblank99172 жыл бұрын
Only because the artillery men don't have to see what their shells do
@chaosXP3RT3 жыл бұрын
The UK: Naval Firepower The USA: Air Power Russia: Tanks and Artillery
@dylan49643 жыл бұрын
Bro the UK is less of a naval power than turkey
@Nikolay_Grigoryev3 жыл бұрын
The UK: USA military
@destroyerarmor3 жыл бұрын
The days of UK pirating the rest of the world are gone
@jaroslavdudas72273 жыл бұрын
I just want to say that Russia is still pretty protected against air (usa) becose russia have best missiles in the world. Doesn't matter what type of missile.