There is a Patron-exclusive video live on the evolution of British Army Infantry Battalion organization during the Napoleonic Wars: www.patreon.com/posts/exclusive-video-90287180 Also there are designs on the shop, including a poster depicting the current US Army Ranger Squad: battleorder.org/shop
@pyeitme50811 ай бұрын
Rad 😊
@nathanmartin964011 ай бұрын
Do royal marine next please
@alandesouzacruz512411 ай бұрын
Make a vídeo about australian sasr
@declanmurphy642711 ай бұрын
Do they get supplied with body bags as well as bullets?
@TennesseeOperator10 ай бұрын
Make a smaller video on MAC-V-SOG, not just the recon teams but also the Supply and Rear Enders
@ViktoriousDead11 ай бұрын
Something to consider is that modern Ranger regiment is basically never at full strength. Most of the time you’re lucky to have 7-8 guys in a squad, we deployed and did isometric HVT night raids with platoons of 20-25 rangers, especially in the winter time when the birds lift capability is hindered by the cold. Typically everything we do now is platoon level, but the way late GWOT was we often did things at the squad or team level, my fireteam went to northern Afghanistan to imbed with RRC and worked soon as a three man team for sometime.
@Soulseeker22311 ай бұрын
To elaborate, NO modern US Army unit is at full strength lol
@kekistanimememan17011 ай бұрын
Recruitment crisis.
@guglielmotranchina24911 ай бұрын
Also remember SOF cannot be mass produced
@clonescope24338 ай бұрын
@@kekistanimememan170Which can be traced back to several things, but including the major one a lack of pay crisis. There's only so much benefits can make up for.
@kpkp-hc1hq8 ай бұрын
In my era 5-7 men squads were common. The only time I remember we were at full strength was right before Panama. When we got back, within a few months, about 20 percent of the battalion quit. Because they could go anywhere they wanted with a CIB and coming from the Regt.
@Killerpixel1111 ай бұрын
Regarding the AT-4 dud rate; I've recently seen a thread by a volunteer EOD tech currently in Ukraine, who pointed out (since he has to deal with them) that the high dud rate is specific to the American M136 variant, which seems to be significantly cost-cut. Original Saab AT-4s from Sweden (and other NATO allies) are apparently much more reliable.
@Kishuun11 ай бұрын
I think the dud rate is high for the American variant as many of them are past or about to be past their service date. These launchers are very old and the only time they were used in the past 20 years is to occasionally shoot at a building. During one of our first deployments we had to shoot our entire battalions stock of them before we rotated out as they were not going to be used after we left the country.
@jb7648911 ай бұрын
citation needed and given the changes the americans made were to the bumpers, sights and sling, i doubt this is true
@chinesesparrows11 ай бұрын
All ammo become less reliable overtime, they are consumables. Even 155mm arty shells and nukes require parts replacement and recheck to be reliable.
@MandolinMagi11 ай бұрын
Really? You'd think after dud 2.36" stuff in Korea and the terrible early M72 the Army would have learned
@thebigmon11 ай бұрын
“I read somewhere on Reddit…”
@jarodaffygaming27611 ай бұрын
The fact he called ranger school a suckfest means he has done his research lol
@publiusscipio569711 ай бұрын
I thought it was a leadership school 😮
@SirCheezersIII11 ай бұрын
@@publiusscipio5697Kinda sorta. On paper, it is the "premier leadership school of the Army," and it is highly recommended for officers and senior NCOs in the infantry to attend. In practice, it's just 62 days of Vietnam LARPing with sleep deprivation and hunger thrown into it. Basically, it's a way for the Infantry top dogs to haze you into the Club. That being said, if you want to prove you can do it and think you have what it takes, do it. Just know that a tab doesn’t automatically make you a superior leader, no matter what some colonel or general says. I've met lieutenants without tabs that were absolutely awesome and their guys would follow them to the ends of the Earth, and I've met lieutenants with tabs that were huge POS's and treated their platoons as stepping stones to higher positions, and everything in between. Sincerely: a tabless MI Captain who was branch detailed into the Infantry and still managed to get solid OERs as a PL and XO.
@FraldinhoBJJ2 ай бұрын
@@publiusscipio5697well it is in that you need to already have leadership skills to graduate and get good peer reviews . It’s kinda more like you’re proving you are a leader, not becoming one
@jason1251811 ай бұрын
Super accurate, I saw you got "snot" right too which is cool, but another thing is weapons sl is called "weasel" (wep squad leader), batt moved to Glocks before the sigs hit regular army which is why I figure most still run Glocks never understood why it wasn't the 17, and saw gunners can be untabbed if they're a competent and strong "private." The person who carries sked or seeker ect is who they like the least (and isn't carrying belt fed) basically
@wehrwxlf211 ай бұрын
I’ve heard that when procuring the first run of glocks into the military they were not able to get authorized for a pistol the same size of the beretta so they were forced into getting the 19 because it fit a “different role.” Whatever that means.
@jason1251810 ай бұрын
Oh that makes a lot of sense. "different role" is kinda funny when talking about a handgun but it rings true haha.@@wehrwxlf2
@oneiljunior98377 ай бұрын
What is ect?
@jason125187 ай бұрын
@@oneiljunior9837 just meant etcetera like ladder, hoolie tool, hammer, stuff of the sort
@Muddy_Reviews4 ай бұрын
@wehrwxlf2 They were able to justify the "need" for the Glock 19 for a concealable hand gun for low visibility and clandestine operations where the M9 would prove to be too bulky. That's how I understand it anyway.
@jackseaward233011 ай бұрын
PLEASE do Royal Marines next.
@abrahamgn361411 ай бұрын
No
@MNWilfriedII11 ай бұрын
OH YEAH!!, ROYAL MARINES AND/OR PARA REGIMENT (UK)
@jackseaward233011 ай бұрын
@@MNWilfriedII Both is good. Royal Marines peak my interest a big more with the reignited interest in raiding in recent years. A video about Paras' doctrine could be nice since they fly around in Chinooks and rovers with Javelins to hit enemy tank formations from behind. But then again, same goes for Royal Marines and their raids.
@Spuggky4511 ай бұрын
I'd definitely watch that
@zeus86611 ай бұрын
No.
@Soulseeker22311 ай бұрын
As a general rule of thumb (at least currently) US military units are under strength with leadership positions often being taken by soldiers of a rank lower than the position is supposed to have. Hell I've even seen Specialists in Staff Sergeant positions before.
@Omnia-Via11 ай бұрын
In some guard units, they have cadets as "interim" PLs because of how understaffed many are.
@qreepyQT8 ай бұрын
@@Omnia-Viapeople reject to be called hero and be thanked for their ‚service‘ for unaliving children somewhere far away in stranger countries
@thebashar11 ай бұрын
This is fascinating. A video that I would love to see would be one on army support and logistics. My wife is a food safety officer and thus part of the vet corp and I would love to learn how that came about.
@jabber199011 ай бұрын
would she still have to go to RASP if she wanted to go Ranger? I've always wondered how that worked
@BattleOrder11 ай бұрын
I have a video on my second channel that goes over the main Army logistics units: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZTFe42ghtOWp6csi=yqjXEL4JYRMHjhcI And a more in depth one about fuel logistics: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mZjIh6itrbSed9Esi=UzSQkzpTV6zj6m2m
@k5384711 ай бұрын
@@jabber1990 Supposedly everyone goes through RASP. Officers go through RASP2, which is less physical but supposedly even harder and more sucky in some ways than regular RASP.
@thebashar11 ай бұрын
@@jabber1990 Just asked her, she says yes she would have to go to RASP.
@defions420810 ай бұрын
@@jabber1990everyone in Regiment is a Ranger meaning they have gone through RASP to wear that scroll doesn’t matter if they are infantry or a cook. Everyone goes. That’s why Regiment has the most bad ass cooks out there.
@MM-qt8gz9 күн бұрын
1/75 Ranger here. The video is spot on. You definitely did your research. Good job.
@Dikranovski11 ай бұрын
Good to have you back and we do appreciate the longer videos like old times. One minor request though, could you bring back the old design when you cover Second World War topics? Just like the Soviet Artillery video for example. That aesthetic was amazing.
@punn21311 ай бұрын
Everyone knows the Ranger squad of D-Day had six men; four with thompsons and two with bazookas
@m1garandMUSIC11 ай бұрын
They can also run really really fast for about 10 seconds every minute
@ericb.435811 ай бұрын
75th Rangers will be among the very first units to get the new M7 6.5 x 51 battle rifle with the M157 Vortex sight "system" andthenew M250 in the same cartridge. That should give then :overmatch' against any Com Bloc infantry weapons. As thatch improves likely Rangers will utilize electric motorcycles for scouting in some situations.
@BlindMonk9311 ай бұрын
Wow, might be your best video yet. Great visuals, ace detail and explanation. Worth the long bake.
@wyattredman474711 ай бұрын
The Medal of Honor theme hit me hard...
@czwarty78789 ай бұрын
I absolutely love this, the soundtrack is masterpiece. This is how WWII sounds to me. Nothing else will ever come close, this position is solidified forever
@richardnoah292211 ай бұрын
Colonel Darby is one of my personal favorite historical Army Officers, a front leader and in my opinion, a massive badass.
@nikyfgh11 ай бұрын
I'm happy to see a video on the Rangers, always loved the gear they have and was curious about their organization throughout their time. Great video! (Also would it be possible to add music list to description please? Some of the tracks used sound really good.)
@BattleOrder11 ай бұрын
I've added the music to the description
@nikyfgh11 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@aaroncook205211 ай бұрын
Great video as always. Although I'm shocked that you didn't mention the whole issue with how officially the LMG team was supposed to have a 1919 by the 1944 TO&E, but after the various exercises in preparation for D-Day they realized how impractical assaulting across the beach or up a cliff face with such a weapon was.
@charlessmith990311 ай бұрын
I know a guy who was a Ranger during Vietnam. He doesn't talk about it AT ALL. My old DS once told me thats how i know we wasnt lying. Every time I asked as a kid we went back. To add insult to injury my names Charlie. I've seen pics of him in country though and he had a M3 Grease Gun.
@TheForgeFather11 ай бұрын
Congrats on the marriage. Here's to it working out and a happy future to you both.
@toysoldier609311 ай бұрын
This was an absolute treat. Excellent work.
@michaelmcgraw153611 ай бұрын
Great video! I would love to see a similar breakdown of US Army SF groups!
@aaroncook205211 ай бұрын
I think they have changed very little at the lowest level. Been based around the 12 man ODA since the 50s.
@Tekisasubakani11 ай бұрын
"Oh, you're a Ranger, that's cool. What do you do?" "I'm a SNOT." :D
@LRRPFco5211 ай бұрын
Awesome video. I was in F Co 52nd Infantry LRSC, among many other units. I wanted to add that Ranger Regiment got M4A1s in 1994.
@LRRPFco5211 ай бұрын
A Raid is a Deliberate Attack with a planned withdrawal, designed to capture or kill enemy forces, destroy enemy weapons & equipment, or rescue friendly hostages/POWs.
@rockylewis52188 ай бұрын
Yeah, I was going to mention that when I got to 1st Batt in '96 the only soldiers still carrying the M16A2 were junior riflemen. Even my M203 was the M4 variant.
@seeleagent11 ай бұрын
the m72a7 has a breakaway rail mount meant for an LAM PEQ. This enables use at night. once used, you can snap the mount off.
@saturnv241911 ай бұрын
I just read the news the other day Rangers are also testing the new XM7 and XM250 NGSWs alone side 101st, wonder if that would change things up a bit.
@BattleOrder11 ай бұрын
I feel like if they had a choice at the personal-level, they'd use the XM7 like the Mk17 and not like they currently use the URGI
@janhoffmann745411 ай бұрын
thanks god battle order is back. great video, probaly the best yet. keep up to good work and show us some more sof / infantry related conent
@HumbleDirtMerchant11 ай бұрын
All good info, Mr. Order. I had no idea the Rangers rode around in Strykers.
@RandomGuy-hr8sb11 ай бұрын
This is your best video yet. Didn’t even feel like half an hour, loved it. Please do more on ARVN or the Bundeswehr.
@ElMachoMucho11 ай бұрын
I was in and the best way to describe how weapons were given out as dumb as it sounds wasnt where they were implemented best but through seniority. Tabbed guys have first dibs on what they want and most of the time pick shortys. When I was new I couldnt even choose my optic till I was tabbed.
@publiusscipio569711 ай бұрын
Ropes.
@ElMachoMucho11 ай бұрын
@@publiusscipio5697 ladder
@mingus445_gaming11 ай бұрын
@@publiusscipio5697 hey hes tabbed now
@kpkp-hc1hq8 ай бұрын
When were you in? I was A Co Badmuther '89-'93.
@ElMachoMucho8 ай бұрын
@@kpkp-hc1hq 2015
@sleepingninjaquiettime11 ай бұрын
Recondo school was legendary. The Ranger and Airborne infantry LRP/LRRP and Marine Force Recon troops had the longest missions outside the wire, and by most were considered the craziest troops in Vietnam. Thats a good thing in combat arms. As someone who deployed with an M4 and pistol, the pistol was annoying. We figured if we were down to just using pistols we were already dead. But pistols do have an advantage in breaching if you're that brave.
@nikitachirich798510 ай бұрын
Yessir , there was a whole segment of MACV that used nothing but a 1911 and a flashlight. Go in there and don’t come out till 1800 hours! ✌️🎖️
@PilotCFIWesHead11 ай бұрын
Dude in the middle school of the thumbnail was my platoon leader when I got to 1st Batt in '83. The photo is from Granada.
@polkbritton11 ай бұрын
Very well done. My grandpa was in the Mars Task Force (formerly Merrill's Marauders) in WWII. He became a battlefield-promoted squad leader with the rank of technician 3rd grade (T/3). According to his discharge he was issued an M-1 rifle. Merrill's Marauders was divided into combat teams roughly based around a battalion and meant to have assets allowing them to be more "self-sufficient" -thought to be an asset in jungle fighting. The MTF went back to regular infantry regiment organization and featured pack artillery, signals, and a mobile medical unit. This structure, with its support elements, proved to be much better at sustaining long range penetration missions.
@MiklRngr11 ай бұрын
During Late Cold War (from formalization of the Ranger Battalions in modern day through Regimental stand up and likely past the invasion of Panama), Rifle Platoons consisted of 4 squads. The 4th Squad was an organic weapons squad consisting of machine guns (M60). The squad had three teams (gunner, assistant gunner (AG), and ammo bearer (AB)). Squad leader was the senior E-6 (assistant Platoon Sergeant) and gunners were senior E-4s and sometimes Sergeants. AG was an E-4 and AB was a private. Each gun team was attached to a rifle squad unless operating in support of the platoon as a whole. ABs would carry M14 (using same ammo as M60) or an M16 while both the gunner and AG carried M1911s.
@TheCerebralDude11 ай бұрын
The book “The Soul Patrol” is an excellent book about the first all black LRRP team in Vietnam
@Hayl3yRides10 ай бұрын
My great grandfather was one of the first US Army Rangers one of the original Darby’s Rangers so it’s really nice to see a video about the history of them ty for making a video about this 🫶❤
@JohnDoe-rw5um11 ай бұрын
The Field Feeding Section (food service) at 13:30 utilizes a Pac Man logo.
@endercraft497611 ай бұрын
Once again an awesome video, keep up the good work! If possible I would love to see more videos on European Armys like Germany, Poland or Sweden in the future
@KonradAdenauerJr11 ай бұрын
Thank you for featuring that 1980s Army recruitment ad.
@yorkiesa11 ай бұрын
That MOH Allied Assault music gets me right in the nostalgia.
@michaelgriggs3956 ай бұрын
Loved the video. Civilians and a lot of regular army soldiers just have no clue how badass the Ranger Regiment has become the last 20 years during GWOT. Their equipment, training, funding, and support has went through the roof. I would any size Ranger element against any other non special forces element of the same size any day of the week and the Rangers will come out on top. They might come out on top against a lot of other countries special forces also. They are THE premier light infantry unit in the world. #RLTW
@drunkmasterOK11 ай бұрын
Wow, very impressing! Great military history and tradition. Excellent trained and equipped units. Although, I got zero information about UAVs in the US Ranger teams. E.g., nowadays in Ukraine many of average infantry platoons, companies have some small civil UAV (DJI Mavic Mini or Mavic 3 for better observation of a battlefield or some anti-armor first person view UAV 7" size or more with some mounted RPG ammo or other explosives). Almost in every infantry, motorized, and mechanized brigades we have UAV companies (mostly strike anti-armor FPV UAVs 7-10" quadcopters or bigger, including planners). SOF units operate strike/anti-armor FPV and other UAVs in a regular basis. As you may know, we have some big continental war with a huge amount of artillery, armored vehicles, unmanned systems, radio-electronic warfare, and hundreds of kilometers of trenches. Fucking new reality, folks...
@GeorgeKovacs-re2qo11 ай бұрын
I am quite pleased with the accurate historic explanations especially concerning the 5307th Composite Group legacy. I would be very interested in a discussion of the OoB and TO&E of the 1st Special Service Force experience as a precourser to the modern SOF.
@GAJake11 ай бұрын
This is a little different of a video idea, but what about making a fictional squad/platoon organization for a militia for a "red dawn" scenario? How would citizens be able to organize and what weapons could we find if we had to fight a guerilla war against a foreign occupation? I'm sure you could find lots of references from Ukraine, the Viet Kong, the war on terror, etc.
@GreenBlueWalkthrough11 ай бұрын
Good to have you back! Which I had no idea that Rangers where only a thing on ocastion... That they like Marines had a clear line of use since the founding on the US.
@Bigcat72611 ай бұрын
2:12 the Medal of Honor music brings back memories of the old games
@geewee1geewee19711 ай бұрын
Hey man, it's been awhile! Great to see you back!
@trundelingporpoise240411 ай бұрын
That MOHAA music activated ALL the nurons in my brain
@johnkennedy61911 ай бұрын
Fantastic video, a lot of work went into it. Thank you.
@Key_highway11 ай бұрын
“Babe wake up battle order just uploaded”
@Kaebuki11 ай бұрын
Video was really good and content-filled, I like the new transitions! Belated congratulations on your marriage!
@jeffreyholdeman304210 ай бұрын
90’s era . Well done on this video! RLTW.
@Voucher76511 ай бұрын
M1 Carbines were also used in the Rangers ranks during WWII, Before D Day one of the Thompson SMG's was replaced with a Carbine for the Normandy invasion
@wyattmull943611 ай бұрын
I respect the fact that you are using the Call of Duty 3 soundtrack in the first part of this!
@The_Faceless_No_Name_Stranger11 ай бұрын
It interesting that the rangers evolved from a quasi shock unit to a recon unit to a quasi SOF unit that’s bigger than SOF so they hit harder
@jheinrichk11 ай бұрын
Awesome vid, very informative. Thanks for doing this piece!
@noodles543811 ай бұрын
I thought Ranger MG teams had 3 men like the USMC on paper. The Rangers now use the MK48 Mod 1 and no longer the Mod 0, I’m not sure if that was for contrasting the look so it’s easier to showcase the M249 v the MK48 in the video as different as the two look almost identical. The MK17 can also be seen using the 5.56 Caliber kit by some NCO in the Battalions despite the MK16 being removed. That’s but some nitpicking to boost the algorithm. Good job on the vid. 👍
@BrianT17511 ай бұрын
Size of a Ranger MG team literally just corresponds with how many excess Privates that particular platoon has. AG and ABs are considered cherry positions until they gain the experience to move on to a rifle squad or come back as a gunner usually after RS. Though a cherry can certainly go straight to a rifle squad as well.
@ViktoriousDead11 ай бұрын
@@BrianT175different per company, the Gunners were always the privates and the AG’s the gun team leaders typically
@BrianT17511 ай бұрын
@@ViktoriousDead my info probably old. In my day we almost exclusively used mk48s and TL was always the gunner.
@ShadowRaids66611 ай бұрын
Exceptional video explaining the regiment in detail.
@TheVioletMongrel11 ай бұрын
Love seeing more recognition for LRRP/LRS, great video!
@hellbreaksloose553611 ай бұрын
First of all congrats on your wedding. Wouldn’t the 11.5’’ barrels get priority for the suppressors. Also there was the one time where one battalion ( I think it was 3rd. Btn) had SCAR-Ls instead of M4s. Great video keep it up.
@GTAC1311 ай бұрын
1/75 tested them in Afghanistan but found that there was no significant benefit to switching to them, especially with the Block II program starting at the time. SOCOM has conversion kits for the MK17s which rechamber them into 5.56 which are rarely used, but there have been some photos of rangers with them in the last few years.
@happyboygogo11 ай бұрын
great video as always! would love to see a breakdown of the MIB and STB as well (maybe on the second channel?)
@GuidoMillonezz11 ай бұрын
What a quality of videos! 6 stars! thank u! I donated already...
@bobsagetbillboard187611 ай бұрын
About time you cover the regiment 😃
@officercat790711 ай бұрын
LOVE your videos! Do you think you’ll ever do Soviet Spetsnaz of the 70s or 80s?
@themilkman540111 ай бұрын
Currently enlisting as a Navy BU rate, and the son of a CM (My old man was NMCB 5, served in Helmand Province in 2009 - 2011 and took part in the Battle of Marjah). Would it be possible to see a future video on the United States Navy Seabees (Construction Battalions for those who don't know) and their formations?
@CraigLYoung11 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing and Merry Christmas to you and your family 😅
@czwarty78789 ай бұрын
This is perfect, the best video on Rangers history. With how much they were changed, disbanded and recreated I always wondered how close today's Rangers even remain to original WWII units, and this video answered it 100%. And congratulations on marriage too!
@YuccavdHeide11 ай бұрын
Would love to see a video on the armor of the Royal Netherlands army
@GoalsBYMen8 ай бұрын
W Video so informative keep them coming especially the shorts I love them so much Thank You and God Speed
@Filip737011 ай бұрын
Why there is no mentioning about colt 653 appropriately called rangers Carbine?
@11BRelo11 ай бұрын
Awsome content wasn’t a Ranger but reg 11B within a Stryker Battalion (damn metal coffins) these dude are FR the top of the game in terms of light Infantry.
@solidspooks868911 ай бұрын
The squad leader probably carries the M72 just so he can tell the privates he actually IS the law!
@brycebuchanan113811 ай бұрын
I wouldn’t mind seeing video on coast guard outfits
@YungFudd177611 ай бұрын
If I were to serve, I'd want to be a Ranger.
@heleenstander236111 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@formwiz709611 ай бұрын
Wrong on the WWII stuff. First, the 1st Special Service Force was part of the Ranger heritage and basically was structured in the same way, albeit with 3 platoons to a company instead of 2. This remained so until 1969when the Combat Arms Regimental System was split to give the Rangers and SF separate lineages. Second, Ranger sections were originally patterned after the Army rifle squad with 12 men, but split into identical squads with the ranking squad leader as section leader (see James Altieri's The Spearheaders).
@smallcat84811 ай бұрын
I wonder why the US army rangers used British LCA rather than America LCP(L) when they both had a similar capacity and similar speed.
@DakotaofRaptors11 ай бұрын
I think this was when the US commandos volunteered to fight alongside the British Army before the US' official participation, such as during the Dieppe Raid.
@jb7648911 ай бұрын
probably just timing, one being available before the other
@Hew.Jarsol8 ай бұрын
America's first special forces. The US Rangers were created, trained and advised by the British Army Commandos in 1942 Achnacarry Scotland. The 1st and 29th Rangers were born. Direct copies of the Commandos. These later used their new Commando skills to create the 2nd and 5th US Ranger Battalions in 1943 who participated in D day. "Ranger" was selected because of the British colonial Rogers Queens Rangers (Scottish border Rangers). 8 British advisors accompanied the US Rangers at Point Du Hoc as well as 3 SWANS. The later US Green berets, Marine Raiders, US Seals/OG all trace their heritage back to the Commandos. US DELTA force was later modelled on the SAS
@peqbox4 ай бұрын
The ranger namesake has nothing to do with any british units. It draws back from the 17th century. Nice misinformation coming from a biased brit
@nikitachirich798510 ай бұрын
Long range reconnaissance patrols was where it’s at though , you can smoke grass , talk shit , torch hooches and your platoon co was basically your mother . ✌️🎖️
@andrewsmith917411 ай бұрын
Rangers go back to before the Revolutionary War. Although there wasn’t continuity. Merril copied a lot of his doctrine from Roger’s Rangers that was a frontier force attached to the British Army in the French Indian War.
@matthewfox156111 ай бұрын
A video like this would be great on TV.
@piotrgrzyb347611 ай бұрын
Please do Polish Special Forces next!
@violetxiv36711 ай бұрын
Glad to see you back
@jhosk10 ай бұрын
Very informative, thank you!
@L11ghtman11 ай бұрын
The Aimpoint Micro gaining popularity over the Eotech is really interesting.
@Jdav97829 ай бұрын
Word on the parallel marching surface is that in the mid-to-late 2010s Mk48 AGs/ABs would have SCARs to mag dump 7.62 when the gun went down
@CanukIsNotAGoose10 ай бұрын
This was truly a wonderful fucking video, gave me the answers to all my questions, man you’ve got a sub from me, holy, this video was amazing
@matthewbrowatzke602411 ай бұрын
Congratulations
@worldwanderer9111 ай бұрын
Get up Private Allen. Rangers lead the way. Move.
@m60pattoncovidiot2911 ай бұрын
could you do a video on why LMGs are typically platoon level and not squad level?
@SirCheezersIII11 ай бұрын
If by LMGs you mean 240s?
@m60pattoncovidiot2911 ай бұрын
@@SirCheezersIII the m240 is a medium machine gun, I'm talk about the m249 and whatever replaces it
@BattleOrder11 ай бұрын
M249s are a squad level weapon
@SirCheezersIII11 ай бұрын
@m60pattoncovidiot29 Ohhh, I think you're mixing up the Army and Marines then. The Army still has 2 M249s at the squad level, to be replaced by the new M250s, but the Marines are now shifting them to a company weapons pool. They can still give their auto riflemen in the squads M249s if they want, but the default is that everyone has the new M27 IARs.
@m60pattoncovidiot2911 ай бұрын
@@SirCheezersIII yea that was my bad I commented before I finished the video and mixed them up, thanks man
@peterbui373311 ай бұрын
The symbol for class 1 - rations looks like a crescent moon. The video has it shaped as Pac-Man haha.
@brdd51411 ай бұрын
@BattleOrder you should prepare to do a lengthy video on the new Army Restructure about to drop
@crimsonking415110 ай бұрын
amazing work here dude
@true_shermanator112911 ай бұрын
Love the video's, have you thought about doing a similar video on Marine Recon Battalions?
@LightEmUpProductionz11 ай бұрын
Nice to see the 44th making an appearance in such a video…🤭
@ericclaptonsrobotpilot727611 ай бұрын
I found a Darby once. I had to take him to the North Sea to save the world.
@11BRelo11 ай бұрын
Do you have one of how Regular Infantry( Mech, Leg, and Airborne ) evolved?
@BattleOrder11 ай бұрын
This older video covers light infantry from World War I to now basically: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mGOtqJubYqd3gbM This one covers Mech in the late 1970s and 1980s: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l3u9nHyaZp2UpZY Other than World War II (where they were different) and getting M4 Carbines earlier in the 1990s, Airborne hasn't been really different from light historically
@11BRelo11 ай бұрын
Thanks!! And great stuff you have
@jeffsilverman608011 ай бұрын
This was all some great work
@farrazaulia291711 ай бұрын
Cool video man
@fridrekr751011 ай бұрын
I've always been a little confused about the Rangers. It basically seems like just another light/airborne infantry unit that has been classified as "elite". In other armies, the light and airborne forces are normally already considered elite and the special forces are organised in small teams sigficantly different from the infantry. I guess it's just because the U.S. forces are so big, that they can afford to pick the best from their "regular" light forces and group them together in a special regiment.
@BattleOrder11 ай бұрын
The regular airborne units are generally considered somewhat higher quality on the personnel level, but they don’t have that many special skills outside of airborne infil. The Rangers have much more time/money to train, focus just on warfighting, and have a lot higher standards. People that get kicked out of the regiment or fail selection (provided they have gone to airborne school, which isn’t actually the case for new entries now) go to the regular airborne units typically. The Rangers also have a real role within JSOC, whereas regular Army airborne units don’t
@personalaccount891411 ай бұрын
They are an airborne light infantry unit, but they're an elite one, the best in the history of the world.
@V.B.Squire11 ай бұрын
@@BattleOrderare the rangers still the closest US equivalent to the British Commando in the WW2 concept?
@ViktoriousDead11 ай бұрын
@@V.B.Squireno, the US version of the SAS is essentially CAG, they filled the role of the original WW2 Rangers
@V.B.Squire11 ай бұрын
@@ViktoriousDead sas and commandos were 2 different things
@ernstbergerbrent4 ай бұрын
I gotta shout out to the Indiana Rangers during the Vietnam War. They were one of the few national guard units with an elite role in that war