Bayes' rule: A powerful thinking paradigm | Julia Galef

  Рет қаралды 23,429

The Well

The Well

Күн бұрын

Think via Bayes’ rule to become more rational and less brainwashed.
❍ Subscribe to The Well on KZbin: bit.ly/welcome...
❍ Up next, There are 8 classes of intelligence. Which are you?: • There are 8 classes of...
Bayes’ Rule is a powerful way to think about evidence, says Julia Galef, co-founder of the Center for Applied Rationality.
Most of us have preexisting beliefs that we stick to firmly, unless we have a breakthrough-that is, we encounter evidence that is so overwhelmingly inconsistent with our beliefs that it forces us to change our minds and adopt a new theory. But even then, we don’t always change our minds.
Growing aware of Bayes’ rule produces powerful, fundamental changes to your thinking. Bayesian thinkers view their beliefs as grayscale; they’re not black and white. You can have “levels of confidence” in ideas that change over time, rather than wholesale subscriptions to ideas that never change.
Read the full video transcript: bigthink.com/t...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
❍ About The Well ❍
Do we inhabit a multiverse? Do we have free will? What is love? Is evolution directional? There are no simple answers to life’s biggest questions, and that’s why they’re the questions occupying the world’s brightest minds.
So what do they think?
How is the power of science advancing understanding? How are philosophers and theologians tackling these fascinating questions?
Let’s dive into The Well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Well on your favorite platforms:
❍ Facebook: bit.ly/thewellFB
❍ Instagram: bit.ly/thewellIG

Пікірлер: 52
@therealcaldini
@therealcaldini Жыл бұрын
Fortunately KZbin recommended a video of Julia explaining Bayes’ rules directly beneath this one.
@kevinscott8642
@kevinscott8642 8 ай бұрын
Ah I had to scroll down a little, but then I found a TED talk by her, perhaps that’s the one you’re referring to. I’ll check it out, thanks!
@crobinso2010
@crobinso2010 Жыл бұрын
I'm sure she spoke much longer than the final edit. My guess is that the editor didn't understand and so left out key parts of the presentation.
@Catlily5
@Catlily5 Жыл бұрын
This is just a short part of a longer piece isn't it?
@mihailmilev9909
@mihailmilev9909 Жыл бұрын
@@Catlily5 how do u know?
@Catlily5
@Catlily5 Жыл бұрын
@@mihailmilev9909I think she spoke longer but I don't know for sure. That is why I am asking.
@robertarvanitis8852
@robertarvanitis8852 29 күн бұрын
She noted "updating." incorporating new information, and "gray-scale," level of confidence. Two key ideas of Bayes.
@SimoneFavaro
@SimoneFavaro 20 күн бұрын
Bayesian thinking is also a great mindset tool for counterfactual reasoning and critical thinking. I encountered the theorem almost 30 years ago, and it changed my life completely. Who I am today it's also because of that.
@existantf21
@existantf21 Жыл бұрын
Would be great if she also expalined what bayes rule is
@GBM0311
@GBM0311 Жыл бұрын
Using the context of this video, it's basically the idea that you need to intentionally adjust your beliefs to more confident or less confident when you encounter new evidence. Crucially, you need to adjust towards the strength of the evidence, not towards 100 or 0. For example, if your belief in something is 50/50 and you find evidence that implies something has around 70% chance of being true you would adjust to 60% not to 70%.
@grand3640
@grand3640 Жыл бұрын
@@GBM0311 so basically a bunch of random bullshit whatever
@GBM0311
@GBM0311 Жыл бұрын
@@grand3640 wut
@milioso88
@milioso88 Жыл бұрын
@@grand3640 thats not very bayesian bro
@renegroulx7029
@renegroulx7029 Жыл бұрын
**explained.
@jareknowak8712
@jareknowak8712 Жыл бұрын
Thats basically how i think everyday. Life made me do it.
@allengreg5447
@allengreg5447 20 күн бұрын
I just finished reading, "The Scout Mindset" two days ago. I remember taking a class Math 505: Introduction To Probability at the U. of Utah in the summer of 1980. We spent a lot of time studying Bayes Rule and its implications but it wasn't until about 12 years after that, that I discovered how controversial it is. Are you working n another book? Here's a potential title: How to Win Every Argument by Ignoring Facts: A Masterclass in Stubbornness
@sonamtashi7855
@sonamtashi7855 Жыл бұрын
I think she is proposing to adopt a way of thinking that your existing beliefs may be wrong. That way you will not look at new information through the lens of your existing beliefs but rather for what it is.
@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468
@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468 Жыл бұрын
Think more the hardest way as wise as possible with this particular video since 3 weeks ago... Vs Think more the hardest way yet I shouldn't be repeatedly framed like I know nothing
@Jake106
@Jake106 Жыл бұрын
Man I was thinking I must be too stupid to get it lol but the I checked the comments and saw that other people were also confused. She didn’t explain the theory!!!
@tomknud
@tomknud 3 ай бұрын
Qualify everything!
@amanullahkariapper2503
@amanullahkariapper2503 12 күн бұрын
Were Italian Americans and Germsn Americans also interned during WWII?
@Cnichal
@Cnichal Жыл бұрын
Here is a video of her talking about it more fully. kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKOuaIuVjdF6eJo
@Cnichal
@Cnichal Жыл бұрын
Is this the entire video?
@mplsraisin
@mplsraisin Ай бұрын
Either I completely missed the point of this video or there wasn't one.
@green8026
@green8026 Жыл бұрын
I like the sentiment, just don't like the 'provably the best way' (1:10)... because no, it isn't proven. we've just seen a lot of data that it is effective. to say it is 'provably the BEST' is to literally disregard the premise behind it.
@stevenjbeto
@stevenjbeto Жыл бұрын
Is Bayes’ Rule sufficient for authorities to refuse to examine records available to them that would resolve the claimant’s statement? Think, ‘He couldn’t possibly be a pedophile, he’s a Catholic Priest’, which put an end to the hopes of many for justice and to their belief in God.
@John-qo9hw
@John-qo9hw Жыл бұрын
No by bayes rule I guess you'd personally pay more attention to those guys given their track record
@SimoneFavaro
@SimoneFavaro 20 күн бұрын
There is a trick on Bayesian thinking that can be tricky. The governing of prior probability. Putting simply, if I consider only the evidence that supports my hypothesis, then the Bayes rule will confirm my initial hypothesis. It's called the Bayes Trap. But if you know it, then you can counter fight and adjust. Lawyer should present the evidence to balance the confirmation bias of authorities or change the ruling authority taking the case to another court.
@Secretaccount7592
@Secretaccount7592 Жыл бұрын
Is this the trailer lmao
@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468
@jimnesstarlyngdohnonglait3468 Жыл бұрын
I still don't understand why you erasing my latest comments? I still haven't understand how you did this to me...I'm not hurt but I'm angered
@olugbadeolusegun917
@olugbadeolusegun917 Жыл бұрын
this is so true 😂😢😮
@hippymoustacherides
@hippymoustacherides Жыл бұрын
Exercise those thumbs and look it up… DYOR!
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 11 ай бұрын
What qualifies THIS entertainer (Julia Galef) to decide what is "rational" or "intelligent" or not? Sorry, but being an entertainer and being given free media platform does NOT qualify her as intelligent or rational. Also, show us how to get governments to overcome sunk cost fallacies. Then people will listen to you & take you seriously. Until then, no.
@rerikm
@rerikm Жыл бұрын
rationalisation explain by a woman. lol
@BicycleFunk
@BicycleFunk Жыл бұрын
Vertasium had a good video on this too.
@spiderlandd2
@spiderlandd2 Жыл бұрын
it was the first video recommended when you played this video, right? I am wondering how the algorthim can be so smart?
@BicycleFunk
@BicycleFunk Жыл бұрын
@@spiderlandd2 it was not, but maybe after my comment it added it. I saw the vertasium one a while back and remembered the general idea.
@LeanAndMean44
@LeanAndMean44 Жыл бұрын
If anyone else than me is wondering, his name is Thomas Bayes and the rule is a statistical one.
@bbwidth
@bbwidth Жыл бұрын
There were no WMD
@garywhite2050
@garywhite2050 Жыл бұрын
Huh?
@harris977
@harris977 Жыл бұрын
Scratches
@rosiepsong
@rosiepsong Жыл бұрын
Click bait
@rishabhprasad5417
@rishabhprasad5417 Жыл бұрын
I have a crush on her❤️❤️
@philsophkenny
@philsophkenny Жыл бұрын
@MrMedmechanic
@MrMedmechanic Жыл бұрын
If Jordan Peterson were a Woman:
@farrider3339
@farrider3339 Жыл бұрын
Hell no ❌ Peterson is a confused unit trying to cure his psychosis by talks to the public.
@John-qo9hw
@John-qo9hw Жыл бұрын
In what way?
@MrMedmechanic
@MrMedmechanic Жыл бұрын
Equally gibberish
A visual guide to Bayesian thinking
11:25
Julia Galef
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
The Bayesian Trap
10:37
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
Стойкость Фёдора поразила всех!
00:58
МИНУС БАЛЛ
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН
Nastya and balloon challenge
00:23
Nastya
Рет қаралды 65 МЛН
LIFEHACK😳 Rate our backpacks 1-10 😜🔥🎒
00:13
Diana Belitskay
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
Why confirmation bias kills your brain | Barbara Oakley
6:40
Roger Penrose - Is Mathematics Invented or Discovered?
13:49
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
Bayesian Statistics with Hannah Fry
13:48
Stand-up Maths
Рет қаралды 390 М.
Bayes Theorem and some of the mysteries it has solved
16:18
Zach Star
Рет қаралды 484 М.
Soldiers and Scouts: Why our minds weren't built for truth I Julia Galef
1:32:00
Long Now Foundation
Рет қаралды 154 М.
How to turn information into intelligence | Barbara Oakley
8:28
You have 3 brains. This is how to use them | Robert Sapolsky
7:44
The medical test paradox, and redesigning Bayes' rule
21:14
3Blue1Brown
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Стойкость Фёдора поразила всех!
00:58
МИНУС БАЛЛ
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН