Vietnam's Fighter Jets | How Strong is it?

[@BehindAsia]

How strong do you think Vietnamese fighter jets are?

[@CrispWhiteSheets123]

Flankers huh? Ask Russians

[@thanhhuyphan3370]

Best

[@congnghequansuvn474]

You forget the Trainer jets which are and will be used in combat roles

[@ghostgunsf3]

Not strong enough to launch attacks but enough to defend. not enough against a supper power, unfortunately but might be enough to buy time till allies (or other supper powers) intervene

[@m_0nrz]

@@ghostgunsf3vietnam has no ally since we are a neutral country, gotta relies on our own military

[@thangnguyenvan1072]

The US handed over the F5 to the Republic of Vietnam but it was only used for ground attacks in the southern provinces of Vietnam. There was no air battle between the North Vietnamese Air Force and the F5. Against the Vietnamese MIG 17, 19 and 21, the Americans always used the F4 phantom 2.

[@byssmal]

Ironic. Once the enemy, now a friend.

[@thangnguyenvan1072]

@@byssmal I find this very normal. America is no longer the America that wants to swallow Vietnam.🙂

[@davidu01]

INCREDIBLY WRONG! The F5 could not match the MIG series aircraft and was quickly pulled after a few losses. The F-5 was still in use by the South throughout the war and 30+ were captured by the North's Air Force thereafter. The F4 was decidedly NOT the ONLY US fighter used against the North, but also the F-100, F-102 F-104, F-105, A-7, F-8 and even the F-9 in the very very early start of the war.

[@sleepingrabbit4011]

About ten years back, there was a spanish documentary of the equipment, the U.S left behind in vietnam the f5s were given to russia About 5 of them and some attack helicopters. The Russians were impressed with the little fighter and wondered why the Americans didn't use them against the migs. And from what I remember, the Chinese were so upset with Vietnam that they started to bully them and ended up in a war a few years later, they lost, of course,

[@ToddBrooks-o5m]

​@byssmal You mean like England, Germany, Italy and Japan et et et.

[@Samanthaandson]

Thanks for the continuous update! I am super excited about how my stock investment is going so far, making over $41k weekly is an amazing gain.

[@MarkAnthony-r9b]

Do you invest with a professional broker? I would appreciate it if you could show me how to go about it.

[@WilliamsDelish]

Thanks to Mrs. Bruce Christelle time in my life, which had a profound impact on me.

[@RodriguezFrank-o5k]

​@@WilliamsDelishWow! Kind of in shock you mentioned expert, Bruce Christelle What a coincidence!!

[@DavidProsper-g5d]

Bruce Christelle has really set the standard for others to follow, we love her here in the UK as she has been really helpful and changed lots of lives

[@user-fq7kn9vw2q]

Life is easier when the cash keeps popping in, thanks to Bruce Christelle services. Glad she's getting the recognition she deserves

[@davidsng3364]

Vietnamese military spends quite a lot on military for its size.. this is mostly because of China.

[@KuFe1992]

China and Campuchia For China: used to protect our islands in the East Sea. For Cambodia: a part of the Cambodian people hate the Vietnamese.

[@kcl2050]

Other than the border war.What makes you think China is the main reason for Vietnam increased in military spending.

[@HàoHào-t3m]

​@@kcl2050Những tranh chấp chủ quyền biển đảo ở Biển Đông giữa các nước láng giềng chúng tôi mất 1 quần đảo vào tay Trung quốc đang chiếm đóng trái phép và điều đó họ luôn quấy rối chúng tôi trên Biển Đông sau cùng chúng tôi rút ra bài học kinh nghiệm xương máu về năm 2014 và những cuộc cải cách chi tiêu quân sự mạnh mẽ

[@PrayerWarriorUSA]

Why still support china as a partner if they are encroaching into vietnam's territory and if vietnam feels threated by china? sharing the same ideology is no longer a security blanket. Perhaps Vietnam could be the catalyst in suppresing china the ccp once and for all.

[@memer-lol]

​@@kcl2050 uhh... Like 2000 years of resisting again China? How about we play a game? Name a single China's dynasty that didn't invade Viet Nam Answer: there are none (even the Communist China rn)

[@LudwigBoltzmann-]

Vietnam upgrades its army size because of China and Cambodia

[@pest.n4240]

Vì Trung Quốc thôi chứ không có cam bu chia ( No Cambodia )

[@matkilau1320]

Upgrade? For target practises.....😂😂😂😂😂

[@nguyentienhung718]

​@@matkilau1320that is exactly what americans said before engaged. And we all know the result🎉

[@cnn787-i9e]

Only China... No Cambodia

[@nguyentienhung718]

@@cnn787-i9e cambodia is on the side of china, they are trying to isolate vietnam

[@tructran8783]

In early 60's , US úsed some F5Cs as testing phase. Later on, only F5A (single seat) and F5B ( two seater) . Then late in the war, there were some F5E (single seater) and F5F (two seater) .

[@PrayerWarriorUSA]

Will the Philippines-Vietnam relations really work? What are your thoughts? What do Vietnamese people think about Filipinos?

[@sungalenh3265]

Chỉ mang tính hình thức vì lập trường của philippin không vững vàng. 5 năm 1 ông tổng thống lên lại thay đổi chính sách

[@thunderfairy6023]

We are Asian We are brother

[@nguyenquancong]

Viet nam and Philippines are brothers.

[@VietDynamicChannel]

Tôn trọng người Philippines... không tranh giành với họ... Việt Nam lo nhiều với trung quốc...để có bản lĩnh có thể solo với trung quốc... bởi vì hai nước đánh nhau hơn 2000 năm..nên sức mạnh quân sự của Việt Nam cũng phải " đừng bao giờ để trưng quốc bắt nạt"... Đó là số mệnh 😅

[@choonhockong8215]

Vietnam is a socialist country and will not be used by the Philippines to target China. Vietnam and China are socialist countries now and share the common goal of trade and improve their citizens' well-being.

[@nguyenvanphi722]

Vietnam's military strength has always been a secret. Even Vietnamese people and officials do not have the right to know about their country's military weapons. Only a few key senior leaders of Vietnam and generals of the Ministry of Defense have the right to know the truth about Vietnam's military weapons.

[@davidsng3364]

Lol typical propaganda. Vietnamese military can be easily assessed by official deals and trade with other countries because Vietnam isn't capable of producing their own advanced weapons. The most advanced stuff isn't any secret... maybe a few low tech stuff that Vietnam can self produce and hide are secrets but those are insignificant and nobody gives a shit about those.

[@SavageDragon999]

It literally isn't a secret. The most advanced weapons in Vietnam's inventory is all accounted for and whenever there's any new tech, it'll be all over the news because Vietnamese government loves to brag about how strong they are. They literally can't keep a secret even if they wanted to.

[@Vantud391]

That applys to every countries.

[@HuyNguyễn-n1d]

Đúng n chúng tôi vẫn bt một số thông tin rằng có khá nhiều loại của việt nam vẫn trong khuân khổ liên xô cũ 😅

[@trantimtamasycu1855]

If Vietnam produces its own weapons, secret weapons are only from the US, Russia, and China. Vietnam's industrial technology level is still very poor. Who does Vietnam buy weapons from? Most of Vietnam's weapons are bought from Russia. The US, Russia, and China all know about Vietnam's weapons. From space, their satellites can see the whole picture of Vietnam.

[@DuyTran-vm3go]

No matter how strong the fighters are, if Vietnam can’t either order parts or self making parts for maintenance and development , it will be useless.

[@kdt3618]

sounds like Apple. You can have the iphone but can't install certain apps to it or use it in non apple ecosystem

[@Kingsufi192]

tbh if they still use the SU-22 then they must upgrade it to make it more stronger and good thing they gonna buy some F-16

[@hoangnguyenminh9594]

SU-22 is being replaced by brand-new Yak-130 from Irkut. They did consider F16, but maybe something prevented it from taking space in VPAf

[@nam430]

@@hoangnguyenminh9594yak130 is a trainer plane. they are still gonna use su22 for a while

[@GMT-yv2br]

What is this obession w F-16 anyway?

[@JuanVargas-jv5ts]

​@GMT-yv2br I know right, look at the ones that Ukraine acquired from European countries 3 have already been destroyed

[@HiranTama]

nah, F-16 is impossible now, mainly due to political reason

[@getaiNight2024]

If you want to create such videos, ensure you use the correct pictures that shows Vietnam aircraft, not Ukraine or other countries.

[@fatmangoboom7722]

F5 was a beautiful fighter!

[@XiaoPP1]

Who’s to say Vietnam not going to share US military tech with Russia and China?

[@lelelolo8758]

No need to share . Chinese has stolen it before 😂 Chinese will share to Russia and Vietnam .

[@JohnDoe-ei5gp]

"Amateurs talk about tactics, but professionals study logistics", current VN military assets are all over the place, they have a bit of everything, unless they have a whole fleet of Sukhois hidden from the world, their army is not sustainable in a serious war

[@Tomahawk2408]

“their army is not sustainable in a serious war” is probably what the French, Murricans and Chinese also thought before the 3 Indochinese wars as well

[@alexdo3838]

Lol not ready for serious wars after we won wars against france, japan, china and usa!!!! How ignorant can one get? 😂😂😂😂

[@viethavn]

Russian weapons are still better than Chinese weapons, Chinese weapons have never been used in real combat, maintenance is very expensive, and even maintenance is impossible if China does not provide components. For example, Thailand had to throw Chinese weapons into the sea to create coral reefs for fish to live

[@DavidSeto-i2q]

When did Thailand thrown Chinese weapons into the sea and what types of weapons were they ?

[@guchengye7788]

真踏馬能胡扯

[@battleriteroyalevietnam8447]

@@DavidSeto-i2q 25 units of Type-69-II due to unreliable, frequently have small error and lack of replacement component. 2010

[@anthonylim5120]

​@@guchengye7788 ok yeah. They're about equally bad. Does that make you happy? 😂

[@guchengye7788]

​@@anthonylim5120是的，中國很弱小，武器也垃圾，所以，你敢試試嗎？😅

[@chad_dogedoge]

Doesn't matter how strong it is , if trees started to talk Vietnamese , avoid it at all cost.

[@Franky46Boy]

Cooperation between Vietnam and the USA... Who would have thought about that 50 years ago?

[@michael27454]

Sana all merong modern fighter jets😂

[@Tapas82]

But non of the countries can compare military power with nepal,Nepal is d only country in the world which has never been colonized thats how brave nepal is.

[@hieuduong7397]

Please learn history again!

[@quynh365]

Bạn có nghĩ Nepal sẽ chịu được sự xâm lược như Việt Nam? Nepal có đánh thắng được Nhật, Pháp, Mỹ và Trung Quốc không?

[@kokliangchew3609]

Malaysia's air force has had a lot of experience with Russian fighter jets, having bought and used MIG 29 and Sukhoi SU30. Simultaneously, they have also operated US F18 Super Hornets. In terms of performance, the Malaysian Air Force has found that the MIG and Sukhoi jets actually do out perform many of the Western fighters during exercises and training with Western air forces. However, the Archilles Heel of the Russian jets are higher and more expensive maintenance programs. In fact, Malaysia turned to Sukhoi because Russia could not supply any more spare parts for the Mig 29s, effectively forcing Malaysia to write them off. However, Malaysia is looking to acquire the Sukhoi SU-57E FELON fifth generation stealth fighter as its next Multirole Combat Aircraft. However, Malaysia is also hedging its bets by not relying fully on Russian jets and that's why it has ordered 18 and a possible another 18 Korean KAI T-50 Golden Eagle light combat aircrafts.

[@mansurazeez2229]

Malaysia operate F/A-18D Legacy Hornet not Super Hornet.

[@labesafi]

How ironic. Now, the US see them as client to buy some merchandise.

[@sundragon7703]

Perhaps Vietnam should look at Saab or KAI, if an F-16 gives them "sticker shock" and Dassault products are a "no go" for historic reasons.

[@hoanglam668]

Dang, we have fighter planes?

[@stevenguyensn60]

Việt Nam war meaningful China military involving fully scale fighting

[@69columbus]

It would be a big mistake to go for the US F-16. The US has a track record of denying upgrades, maintenance and spare parts to clients, if the client does not tow the US line in Foreign policy. The US has even reneged on sending aircraft to clients even after the clients paid for them. If Vietnam must diversify it's sources then they could consider Sweden's JAS-39 Gripen, Korea's FA-50 (or the Boromae) or the Chinese J-10C.

[@40letranhuutin68]

There is no way we will buy weapon from China, Vietnam and China are the opposite.

[@GMT-yv2br]

Agree 100%.

[@quynh365]

Việt Nam không bao giờ mua vũ khí của Trung quốc

[@choonhockong8215]

Spot on

[@chad_dogedoge]

Lol , you mean Russia

[@imbetterthanyouis]

i dont think the f 16 thing is guna happen , around the time tis video came out vietnam decided they wouldnt deal with america and go back to dealing with russia so yeah

[@tamzidkarim9402]

With US sanction no more on Vietnam, other than US origin weapons platforms, France with it's Dassualt Rafale (Indonesia being a future operator of it)or Sweden with it's SAAB JAS 39E/F Grippen NG (already operated by Thailand in C/D variant) can also be an option for the VPAF. Or if they want to go for a cheaper solution, then the South Korean KAI F/A 50 block 20 and it's upcoming single seater variant can be another suitable option for Vietnam, given that, most of the countries in South East Asia (Phillipines, Indonesia, Thailand being existing operators and Malaysia also given order for this aircraft) have already opted for it. Which can increase the interoperability of VPAF with other air forces in the region, at the same time getting access to western sensors, electronic warfare and weapons packages with the F/A 50, ultimately paving the way for westernisation of the VPAF.

[@tenglim4406]

Yes, indeed. However, it will still depend on the quality of Vietnamese pilots on various air combat-related matters such as inter-operatibility, air maintainence/worthiness, and exercises' frequency? This is because, no single branch of military can/will be able to take on the opponent's entire military without the assistance from elsewhere, like allies and/or other military branches itself.

[@tamzidkarim9402]

@@tenglim4406 Yes these things takes their own times. In the end all depends on how much the Vietnamese govt is willing to invest and what priorities their strategy makers sets for short, medium and long term.

[@hoangnguyenminh9594]

Vietnam has been in consideration for the Gripen for years.

[@tangminh11]

We need more Sukhoi Jet =))))

[@pecora31]

This channel hasn’t delved deeply into the technical aspects; speed is insignificant compared to the aircraft's electronic systems and its Air-to-Air Missiles (AAMs), as well as its radar cross-section (RCS) dispersion capabilities in modern warfare . I will briefly summarize the theory of modern air combat for you (the specifications are entirely theoretical, with minimal or partial real-world validation). The Su-30MK2 of Vietnam is a 4.5-generation aircraft without stealth capabilities, using the N011M Bars-R radar-a type of Passive Electronically Scanned Array (PESA) radar. It has a detection range of 400 km but only for large and outdated aircraft like the B-52 and C-130. For modern aircraft (non-stealth), with an RCS of about 3 m², the detection range of the N011M Bars-R is only about 140 km (in head-on conditions). But just look around Vietnam, Singapore has the F-35 (5th-generation stealth aircraft) with the advanced AN/APG-81 radar (an AESA-Active Electronically Scanned Array), which is far superior to PESA. Its RCS is only about 0.0015 to 0.005 m² (front-aspect). Notably, China has equipped its Air Force with the J-21 (5th-generation stealth aircraft) and soon the J-31/35 (also 5th-generation stealth aircraft). They have an RCS of about 0.1 to 1 m² (front-aspect) and are also equipped with advanced AESA radars (the J-31/35 has the KLJ-7A or equivalent, and I cannot disclose the model of the J-21, but generally, they have a very long operational range). In modern air combat, the one who can “Search and Destroy” the fastest will win. The N011M Bars-R radar, under optimal conditions, can detect the F-35B at about 60-70 km, while Chinese aircraft can be detected at about 80-100 km. Meanwhile, the F-35B can detect the Su-30 at about 250-300 km (because the RCS of the Su-30 is very large due to its size, around 10-15 m²), and similar Chinese aircraft can detect the Su-30 at about 200-250 km. With such a significant advantage and their advanced AAM systems (Singapore’s F-35 is equipped with the AIM-120C-7 and soon the AIM-120D with an effective range of about 100-150 km. China currently has the PL-15 with an effective range of about 150-200 km. Vietnam is using the R-77-1 with an effective range of 200 km, but this depends on the aircraft’s radar locking onto the target), it can be said that the Vietnamese Air Force needs significant changes to effectively protect its territory with minimal losses in the event of conflict or war (which is also why they are investing more in electronic systems like radars and advanced air defense systems). In fact, I am missing some basic details about Active Radar Homing Air-to-Air missiles, but you can find more information by google it. There are some open sources that provide basic introductions and explanations of how they work.

[@ThaoTao-sn5ox]

Những thứ chúng tôi có chỉ là bên ngoài 😂😂😂. bên trong các bạn không bao giờ biết ❤❤. và Việt Nam cũng trả sợ bất cứ quốc gia nào

[@pecora31]

@@ThaoTao-sn5ox Nhưng vấn đề là tôi cùng phe với bạn:))

[@nam430]

@@ThaoTao-sn5oxand this is why we can never truly become modern

[@TrinhNguyen-sy8ru]

By 2025, Vietnam will review and the World will know what Vietnam has!

[@RetiersTravelling2425]

Nothing 😅😂😅

[@4rct1c9Ic3m4n]

The US should not waste its time on Vietnam with regards to weapons. Vietnam is strongly in Russia's orbit-with good reason. It was a strong supporter/supplier of weapons during the Vietnam war

[@LaLa-tx6jx]

Làm như người Việt chúng tôi cần vũ khí của Mỹ lắm vậy 😂, vũ khí vừa mắc, lại còn nhiều yêu cầu oái ăm :))). Người Việt đi mua sắm có trí tuệ lắm, mua cái gì vừa rẻ mà sài được. Mà bạn yên tâm đi, có nguồn tin Việt Nam sẽ ký kết mua sắm với mỹ để chào đón tổng thống mới, và chắc chắn không phải F16 :)))

[@anthonytran7566]

@@LaLa-tx6jx Mua may bay My o phai mua giac My lai may bay cho khong, Vietnam vua lai may bay vua thoi com an tren khong !!!!!

[@leochanel8749]

chúng tôi cần vũ khí của Mỹ chắc ?? vũ khí của Mỹ quảng cáo sai sự thật , nhiều vấn đề kỹ thuật nên chúng tôi không cần cho lắm

[@HuyNguyễn-n1d]

Mặc dù thế n vũ khí mĩ lại có phần chất lg hơn nga hơn nx việc này còn liên quan đến địa chính trị nên cần thiết lắm 😮

[@leochanel8749]

@@HuyNguyễn-n1d chất lượng cỡ thánh khí jevelin với Himars , patriót , rồi thiết xa vận M1A1 HC ở chiến trường Ukraine ko ? mày chọc tao cười hả mày

[@roymichaeldeanable]

Vietnam Military based on Russia not NATO Standard...we can see which is more successful

[@olivierfaber8478]

Outdated, the Viets have to shop in Europe. Like Gripen or Eurofighter. Their media is a Putin lover Ruzzia show though.So probably a no go..Korea has some good options like the Boromae..

[@Modified-bf109]

I saw an m41 bulldog in their hanger once,

[@lenkautsugi5747]

They need gripenE sure it cost more then most jet but it cost less to operate

[@TheSnowyWind]

The little snake just like a deep discount.

[@battleriteroyalevietnam8447]

its very hard for vietnam military to buy US aircraft/tank because of the cost. Vietnam war theory is number + reliable. They tend to mass equip military with reasonable weapon rather than spend a lot in a few unit. sometime in the future, maybe a small number of US NATO weapon can be bought to act as special unit. But never the main force. This ideology is even apply to their personel arm, when theyre sticking to 7.62x39mm and make use of old ak47 and now is a new line of their own version of galil ace.

[@donh696]

That little snake had scared the shit out of the dragon many times in history pal! You know what I am talking about :)

[@TranHuhihoha]

Hoan ho viet nam Sam nhieu may bay su 54 F35 va tau San bay ?

[@tuantranvan5328]

này các bạn thân yêu của chúng tôi, trên lý thuyết cứ máy bay hiện đại là phải thắng máy bay thế hệ cũ, nhưng các bạn tìm hiểu chiến tranh việt mỹ sẽ biết, người việt nam chúng tôi đã khai thác được mỏ nhôm của B52 trên đất việt nam mà người mỹ mang tới. và chúng tôi tự hào là trên thế giới này chỉ mình việt nam mới có công nghệ để khai thác chúng

[@esawparkerjr637]

Russian and Chinese equipment😂😂😅

[@BlueMoon-xd2jj]

As strong as China allows them ..

[@andywong7708]

they are outdated , would be a sitting duck for fifth-generation fighter jets

[@AnlinLee]

Vietnam airforce produce 16 aircombat aces while US produced only 3 aces. 😂😂😂😂

[@charlie44266]

Stop using the mesningless phrase "fighter jet". There is no such airplsne. You don't call bombers " bomber jets" do you? Just call them fighters or bombers or attack planes. Adding "jet" to their name marks you as a noob.. Its not "SOO-30" its either "ess you 30" or "Sukhoi 30". Your narrator bot is broken in other ways which renders them lame. FIX IT . Get a native spesker of aviation technical English to review the narrations before publishing them. Right now. they are just an embarrassment.

[@khurshidanwar1483]

There are special complications in case of Vietnam and it is not that simple, but countries have an additional choice now.China can offer whatever USA and Russis can offer and it is much cheaper also.There are almost no conditions attached.China has an additional advantage now.Russia is almost in no position to sell aircrafts, etc. and USA sells its weapons with a lot conditions attached.

[@choonhockong8215]

Vietnam can buy China J10 latest model. To depend on the US for weapons is a dead trap.

[@bayuww1417]

Number 1 in Southeast Asia in Quantity.

[@angkhoanguyen6114]

Quality outclassed entire SEA as well.

[@RetiersTravelling2425]

Counting from bottom!? 😂😅😂

[@angkhoanguyen6114]

@@RetiersTravelling2425 the top 😎😎😎

[@bayuww1417]

@@RetiersTravelling2425 nope, Vietnam still have a lot of military equipment and logistic ex US - Viet War in their reserve. That is because support from China and USSR.

[@RetiersTravelling2425]

@@bayuww1417 That's militaires stuff very well old WW2 and WW1. US support VNCH in Việt Nam war, uncaparable. And Việt Nam bought from Russia and China!!? Nowadays 5th generation military equipment, don't even to compare...hahaha

[@davidu01]

When are you and others going to stop wrongly using the term "aircraft" when speaking of "airplanes"? The term "aircraft" also includes "helicopters" and other controlled and remote-controlled flight devices/platforms. Also, the plural of "aircraft" is decidedly NOT "aircrafts" but "aircraft". Not observing this correct labeling undermines your channels credibility and degrades your 😢 reputation. It presents your channel as foolish.

[@michaelhband]

👍👍👍❤❤❤✈✈✈

[@NguyenNguyen-rk1qx]

Sức mạnh của Không quân Việt Nam đến từ đội ngũ phi công cực kỳ chất lượng ! Phi công Việt Nam là những người có kỹ năng tốt, dũng cảm và được thừa hưởng rất nhiều kinh nghiệm chiến đấu trong quá khứ !

[@KaryoLecek777]

Nguyen Again 😅

[@40letranhuutin68]

@@KaryoLecek777Yes

[@CrispWhiteSheets123]

Nói TA đi bạn, sao họ hiểu đc?

[@cuongcomrade6115]

@@CrispWhiteSheets123 lmao thời đại 4.0 rồi tự translate đi, chứ ông nghĩ họ ngu ko biết dịch ak::)

[@CrispWhiteSheets123]

@@cuongcomrade6115 joke bạn ơi

[@taskmaster2833]

If you interested in Vietnamese military industry. Make a video about Viettel.

[@roymichaeldeanable]

Over 700 million people depend on NATO Standard Military...unless Vietnam understands this they may suffer in any conflict... As happened in the VN War...1 million dead

[@lelelolo8758]

Did you know that to kill 1 million people, the US had to spread 17 million tons of bombs throughout Vietnam? It is more than the two world wars combined and 3,500 times more destructive than the two atomic bombs dropped on Japan. It was an act of intentional genocide, but the US still pretended they were innocent. They just need a reason to kill people

[@RetiersTravelling2425]

2 millions exchange 58,000 USA and 225,000 Republic of South Vietnam 😅😂😅

[@lelelolo8758]

@@RetiersTravelling2425 The US used the excuse of a tactical retreat, but in reality they were helpless. And the day of losing South Vietnam was set since they withdrew their troops and accepted defeat. Tactical withdrawal is just a reason to avoid embarrassing the world's number 1 superpower :) and today it's happening again with the Taliban. Shame on America and its accomplices

[@thanhnguyen-xi8fq]

Most of Vietnam airforce aircrafts are from Russia...their most so called advanced fighter jet are Russian made Su30... The war in Ukraine and Armenia-Azerbaijan have proved that even the best-domestic full functioned fighterjet for Russia itself are junk...They have no chance against Thailand Griphen, F-16 let alone the Rafale or anything better than that. Vietnamese pilot is another problem...I dont know why those who in charged of leading the airforce still have a mind set of pilot would be a big guy litterally. They have to eat a compulsory portion of meals everyday, which made them all fatty boy, rather than let them eat according to their needs. That is very wrong.

[@FebiAndikaPutra]

Ya vietnam memang kuat, tidak seperti singapura 😂

[@MASMIWA]

Stick with the Russian or Chinese products, more affordable and easier to maintain.

[@GMT-yv2br]

Agree 100%. Not to mention you won't get handcuffed by constantly changing criterias like human rights, religious freedom and other NGOs bullshit reason to start color revolution.

[@quynh365]

Về vũ khí, Việt Nam không bao giờ hợp tác với Trung quốc

[@MASMIWA]

@@quynh365 Stick with Russia and your enemy, the US. Buy high speed rail from China.

[@joshuatran3667]

Vietnam never had a strong air force.

[@jilldawson89]

Southeast Asia is a small region, and most countries are still struggle with their economies except Indonesia and Singapore. Being the best in this region is nothing to brad about since the dominance force in Asia is CHINA!!! Although Obama and Trump allow the US to sell weapons to Vietnam, I don't think Vietnam will take advantage of the offer for the following reasons: 1. The US weapons in general are expensive and are difficult to maintain although they are better than the ones from Russia. 2. Vietnam's military budget is small. 3. Vietnam has the HABIT of sending US fighter jets to the Soviet Union/Russia for "further analysis and studies" which causes the US to hesitate and think twice before it sell its most advanced weapons to Vietnam.

[@tenglim4406]

Actually, no. ASEAN is faring pretty decent in the recent years as compared with the other region(s) due to the increasing influx of investments, people, and resources into the region itself. As a result, they are able to support the increasing military budget/expenditures, in light of the rising threats nearby. That said, what you mentioned held some truths, but not exclusively right: 1) Expensive? Yes, but it'll not be difficult if you had the technology transfer/support from the Americans or Western countries, as compared to the Russian/Chinese, whom doesn't (always) provide such services unless being paid extras for it; 2) Decent and robust. This is in comparison to other regions or countries itself, and measured against the GDP too. Moreover, the Vietnamese military budget can also be further expanded due to the increasing economic growth - subjective; 3) True, but not defining factors. Because, it can be severely be limited by several factors on both the Russian/Chinese, such as technology or material ban, and selling of stripped-down planes; But, whatever it is. It will ultimately depends on: the Vietnamese interests?! Note: Both China, and Vietnam do not have a good relationship between them, with the recent war fought in the 1970s/80s.

[@NguyenNguyen-rk1qx]

Một điều nữa là Việt Nam đã quen với hệ đo lường kiểu Nga nên việc chuyển sang máy bay Mỹ thì phi công sẽ mất nhiều thời gian để làm quen với các thông số kỹ thuật kiểu Mỹ !

[@sungalenh3265]

Indo cái bọn thổ dân đấy mà cũng đòi so với việt nam hả. Còn singapo không có chiều sâu chiến lược 1 trận thua là mất nước.

[@quynh365]

😅😅😅

[@angkhoanguyen6114]

Vietnam economy struggling? Please we still remain the fastest growing economy thank you.

[@someguygaming9248]

Dont think "one of the best" in Southeast Asia is much of a brag

[@SavageDragon999]

And who was bragging?

[@davidgibson3631]

tell that to US , Chinese and France when they think send a bunch scarp fighter to threat Vietnamese

[@someguygaming9248]

@@davidgibson3631 Aint my fault for that

[@someguygaming9248]

@@SavageDragon999 Brag like a strength projecting title

[@SavageDragon999]

@@someguygaming9248 The title doesn't project any strength. Learn to read.

[@richwen8769]

2 Su-27 and 4 Su-30Mkk and 32 Su-27Mkk, lol

[@quynh365]

No. 12 Su27 và 36 Su30 Mk2 + 12 Su35s + 12 Gripen

[@videovequandoivn]

@@quynh365đâu ra 12 Su 35 12 Gripen thế ngáo à

[@quynh365]

@@videovequandoivn đang mua rồi

[@bangkong_official]

masyarakat paling rasis

[@thanhhuyphan3370]

Vietnam in 2077: Su-57, MiG-41

[@damiann4734]

Obama was great!

[@tuantruong-e6k]

All shit. Blah blah blah,...

[@biswajitbhattavharjya2115]

Vietnam?

[@beaniegamer9163]

Vietnam used old Russian waste machines... no match Indonesia or Singapore. Barely an army 😮

[@angkhoanguyen6114]

Lol, Vietnam already built it own war machines, and mastered many hardwares that Indonesia and Singapore never capable of making currently.

[@romenguyen9389]

But we have a country, how about you? 😮😂😂

[@lelelolo8758]

Only Vietnam has America's technology to exploit aluminum in the sky. Even if it's just using old Soviet aircraft 😂

[@guardiandemonx7936]

vietnam already have fighter drone technology from viettel

[@kaizen4276]

Don’t you mean viettell got them from china 🇨🇳

[@angkhoanguyen6114]

​@@kaizen4276proof? Vietnam and China still in conflict in the East Sea, what made you think we took from China, considering their not so good quality?

[@angkhoanguyen6114]

​@@kaizen4276Do not made ridiculous assumption. Vietnam is and will never buy Chinese weapons.