So many words definitions have changed or used against us to control or suppress information and knowledge, this is why old books like this one are so important to having a free society. Words and there original meanings are very important to understand context of the past, and to also protect us from words being misused and manipulated to change the way we view things.
@sergioortiz1839 Жыл бұрын
I am trying to find one online. Any suggestions?
@ArturoPena-v3w2 ай бұрын
Where can I get one, thank youu
@saleemahfareed449511 ай бұрын
In the inside is it large print to see the words better
@enriqueshinobi56903 жыл бұрын
That is incredible 😳
@claudiojohnperri88162 жыл бұрын
Where can I get a copy of the 1828 NOAH WEBSTER DICTIONARY
@1217mikegrs2 ай бұрын
Amazon
@lifewithkennya78383 жыл бұрын
Great
@thykingdomcome49063 жыл бұрын
👍
@amyfisher1472 жыл бұрын
Yeah I have some questions are the people who are misclassified as negro black in color Indian native American African-American are they Moors also who are the Aboriginal Americans and what is the definition of European
@TWESHELLSHOCKR2 жыл бұрын
Alot of the information you seek is in the Library of Congress. Or just look up the Word in Older Dictionaries like this. Once you see it and comprehend it yourself, then start your journey from there.
@vantejohnson3683 Жыл бұрын
Where did you purchase from??
@KrazykoolSaurabh1388 ай бұрын
Its available on amazon
@The_name1052 жыл бұрын
I got it for Christmas. It is definitely very good.
@wildernessofzinn173 жыл бұрын
Look up the word BATRACHOMYOMACHY It's in that dictionary, but NOT in the Third New International or many others. In the Preface, Noah Webster foresaw 300 million people as the population of America 200 years hence. Well...here we are, 200 years hence (well, dang close), and we're around 330 million. It is indeed a wonderful dictionary and not secularized like modern ones.
@rgortega12859 ай бұрын
I never saw any maps or bteakdown of certain letters of detail views of english languague and the cover was green and all I've seen in past were red or light colored cover books. So your saying the first dictionary had no maps or other facts of knowledge? Hum, maybe it was an obvious short version of the 1913 webster dictionary. Mine has maps of locales on earth, a value breakdowns of letters, and more. Bottom line.