I've been wrapping my head around NIX OS, bit of a learning curve but the fact that it's so easy to reproduce once you do get everything set up is something I really like. I'm also partial to FreeBSD (or OpenBSD for security) over Linux when I can use it.
@Hypn0s25 ай бұрын
I do like NixOS. It reminds me of like configuring a Cisco switch/router.
@johndo1005 ай бұрын
I found that FreeBSD is easier to use. I'm running it now, bhyve (vm) and jail (container) works so well.
@PortsmouthHarbourBoats6 ай бұрын
I think you might of missed OpenBSD in them most secure. Qubes, Tails, Kali etc are hardly operating systems for servers?
@comosaycomosah6 ай бұрын
Lol right like wth 😂
@Hypn0s25 ай бұрын
I agree. Not sure why Qubes, Tails and Kali were in a video about servers. If I had a high netsec job with a ton of storange/ram/threads, I'd absolute run Qubes as a workstation OS.
@kjakobsen6 ай бұрын
Let's be fair. If you needed all the advanced features of VMware, you were never the target demographic of the free ESXI to begin with.
@wasiqmahmood77344 ай бұрын
Some server's OS are missing i.e. RedHat, Dietpi. Qubes and Tails OS is for Desktop level OS privacy search and Kali OS is for Pentesting use, we cannot use them at the server-level.
@MichaelChristoffersen6 ай бұрын
I'm sticking with BSD, but nice summery :)
@Hypn0s25 ай бұрын
TrueNAS core is pretty cool too - for people that want a fancy GUI. Bhyve has come a long way in recent years as an option for virtualization. If it was one server for one task, BSD I would consider. Especially if security was a factor.
@rhousand6 ай бұрын
These days I land on NixOS as a file server and for virtualization using Nix Flakes. The Nix language is kinda like learning VI. It has a learning curve but pays off once you figure it out.
@isaacaymerich27416 ай бұрын
I use Nix for almost everything at the moment, I really recommend it. I even use it as a replacement for my home internet router
@gregoryholmes42616 ай бұрын
I appreciate the advice. I'm just getting into this and thinking to pick up some minis for a homelab so mostly interested in the hypervisors. I am also learning OpenStack but not sure yet how it all fits together.
@everistusolumese935019 күн бұрын
Me too. I got me some IBM x3650 M4 and Dell PowerEdge C6100 which has 4 blades server in 1. Also got a Alienware, an M1 Pro, A trigkey mini pc and a laptop I might use in clamshell mode. I am just trying to figure out where everything fits in. I might run a Proxmox cluster and use VMs and containers to test everything else out or run ESXi and run other services in VMs and containers till I gain a better understanding of everything.
@JonatanCastro6 ай бұрын
proxmox
@et_phonehome_28224 ай бұрын
I used to run RedHat Enterprise as my VMs, but have moved towards CentOS.
@allanocenar32532 ай бұрын
thank you sir, its a big help
@germanlazzaroieqsinformati56396 ай бұрын
Thanks Brandon for your videos. always yours videos are very interesting. Regrads from Argentina Esquel!
@amitchettri_ac6 ай бұрын
Hi Brandon, can you kindly provide the learning path for Nutanix please.
@adamcadd6 ай бұрын
Xen Orchestra can be installed from source and this unlocks many features
@dmitrykobzar5 ай бұрын
Hi, do you know about the virtualization of Virtuozzo?
@yesmilan87955 ай бұрын
where is REDHAT ?
@bonitoviegas1136 ай бұрын
congrats . awesome tutorial
@algum5045 ай бұрын
Well, just learned bunch of terminology for the first time like vurtual servers, compartment servers and whatnot. Now replacing windows server 2012 that i barely know how to administer seems impossible task @@
@Psoewish7 күн бұрын
I know this is an older comment by this point and you may have found your way by now, but just in case you're still looking but are on the fence about it. Based purely on personal experience, so very anecdotal, I've found linux based servers to be way easier to administer in the long run. You're obviously going to have that initial learning curve going into it as you would with anything, but I find that everything just makes more sense once it clicks. On windows I feel like I'm always having to fight against the os and work my way around some pretty weird implementations. At the end of the day, the most important thing is of course having a running system. As the old saying goes "if it aint broke, don't fix it". I personally moved away from windows because while it did work, the user experience was broke, and needed fixing, but your situation might be very different.
@huyhandes6 ай бұрын
Any best suggest for GPU workload? I use ubuntu server and to be honest, too much struggle with nvidia driver and cuda and so on...
@reneb52226 ай бұрын
Hi Brandon. Great video
@user-od6gi4lz8t6 ай бұрын
The perfect server OS doesn’t exist, it exists the best server OS for your applications! 😅
@VictorEstrada6 ай бұрын
Got a little distracted with hypervisors uh lol
@phillipdesuze18016 ай бұрын
I would add Fedora Server to this list
@NetBandit706 ай бұрын
Honestly, it's really good. Podman and cockpit native, full fat virtualization, regular package installations. It's pretty much one and done. And it's kept current with a well tested update cadence.
@Hypn0s25 ай бұрын
This is interesting. I keep forgetting that Fedora Server is still a thing.
@mikewallis77626 ай бұрын
I thought you might have included Hyper-V in the Hypervisor section since it is a part of all Windows Desktop and Server OSs.
@NetBandit706 ай бұрын
Maybe if Micro$oft hadn't killed off the bare metal version of Hyper-v it would have made the list.
@g.s.33896 ай бұрын
I agree with any word you said.
@TheCocoaDaddy6 ай бұрын
Where wasn't there any mention of AIX or OS/2???? *sigh* lol j/k
@NetBandit706 ай бұрын
What!?! No System/36?
@PracticalHomeLabs6 ай бұрын
OS/2 was fantastic! The ONLY time I ever saw it crash, was when Hardware died. There is a reason it was the OS of choice for most ATMs back in the day.
@HksjJkdkd5 ай бұрын
GNU/Linux or any BSD since they are the fastest and securest systems and dont need to shutoff for updates (unless ist a super important one security or kernel but you dicede if you want to update eitherway). So i would say Stable Debain since Debain is like a rock you can hurt yourself with it but it will never break.
@stemid854 ай бұрын
CoreOS has replaced all my VMs and VPS. Minimize issues with immutable container hosts. I think Linux in general needs to be an appliance with easy image updates.
@tanju50426 ай бұрын
Where is OpenStack?
@icinemagr46216 ай бұрын
well when it comes to security os FREEBSD and as i see you did not even say anything about it.
@jmandman7856 ай бұрын
What about best OS for web-hosting and/or Firewalls applications?
@Hypn0s25 ай бұрын
Firewall = pfsense. Web-hosting = depends but I'd probably do a container.
@paul4546 ай бұрын
Great video as usual, but I can't get over the name Nutanix . It sounds like a dietary supplement, maybe for hair loss or Low T. 🤣
@NetBandit706 ай бұрын
Non-dairy milk substitute
@everistusolumese935019 күн бұрын
Where does Ceph fall into?
@josecarlosramos70036 ай бұрын
Is Microsoft Azure Linux?
@AndreMiguelLopes695 ай бұрын
Microsoft Azure is hypervisor and storage on the cloud. So it's whatever you need !
@diablobarcelona6 ай бұрын
You're overlooking FreeBSD
@sudocvua6 ай бұрын
and OpenBSD
@NetBandit706 ай бұрын
@@sudocvua OpenBASED
@calindan57174 ай бұрын
Harvester as well.
@soundsoftranquility22396 ай бұрын
Parot os is a nice alternative to kali
@DeadCat-426 ай бұрын
I use ipx for my internal network, I don't even have the IP stack on it.
@NoahM.Angell-sd4ez6 ай бұрын
Positivity is contagious. Spread it! 🌈
@othmanhendysuseno-kg8er5 ай бұрын
its not servers operating system , but its an hypervisor.
@chromerims6 ай бұрын
Best server OS's by use case, . . . This is the best video for that 👍
@illegalmexicain6 ай бұрын
No, RockyLinux ?
@NetBandit706 ай бұрын
A valid question... but getting away from the ivory tower of RedHat might be a better strategy. And Fedora Server get's you a pretty good experience without the drama.
@vinothrajavel88706 ай бұрын
"The video was informative, but I expected an information Hyper Converged Infrastructure (HCI) as well, given its growing importance in server environments. Covering HCI alongside the server OSes would have provided a more comprehensive perspective."
@TheEmperorXavier6 ай бұрын
I couldn’t agree more. Hci solutions are running K8s workloads and the benefits it brings is a great way to build on prem applications
@jeffnew12136 ай бұрын
HCI is the basis for Nutanix AHV and available with vSphere as vSAN. Both Nutanix and vSphere (ESXi) were covered.
@TheEmperorXavier6 ай бұрын
@@jeffnew1213 there are other HCI solutions such as Microsoft’s failover clustering with storage spaces, and opensource solutions such as Harvester
@jeffnew12136 ай бұрын
@@TheEmperorXavier I've never seen MS clustering on a list of HCI solutions. I think that's a stretch, but okay. Harvester has zero percent market share and seems to be a cobbled together solution. Are either of those two solutions really fit to be in a list of "best server OSes?"
@TheEmperorXavier6 ай бұрын
@@jeffnew1213 I agree with you in terms of best fit but I think it would be good to evaluate them as they are options and are used in different organizations
@brandonlee7125 ай бұрын
odly enough, my name is brandon lee, and i was thinking about starting a yt channel on virtualization.... turns out someone else with my name did just that LOL
@durgeshkshirsagar51603 ай бұрын
Do you know Kunfu? Lee
@VirtualizationHowto3 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@AlekseiLarkin6 ай бұрын
What kind of your glasses do you have ?!
@c0p0n2 ай бұрын
Ubuntu is easily the best all-purpose server OS there is at the moment.
@typingcat17 күн бұрын
That's what she said.
@dexiPL6 ай бұрын
unRAID?
@ericneo26 ай бұрын
RHEL and Almalinux if you need enterprise hardware driver support, because Debian is anti-propriety drivers.
@NetBandit706 ай бұрын
I don't know if that's a fair characterization. Debian is pretty accepting of all hardware; and since version 12 even more so.
@ericneo26 ай бұрын
@@NetBandit70 It is seeing it's their official stance. Their goal is to force you to go 100% free with no allowance for reality. Ubuntu doesn't have this stance.
@lightechoes6 ай бұрын
Your information about Debian is outdated.
@ericneo26 ай бұрын
@@lightechoes Ah yes, another delusion Linux elitist on copium who lies about the actual state of Linux. There's a reason why in 2024 we are still manually installing Realtek drivers on Debian and Proxmox. Mint, Ubuntu, RHEL and AlmaLinux don't have to put up with any of the Debian nonsense from the stone age. Their upgrades also check the new kernel is present on the system before removing the old one which Debian still hasn't fixed.
@Vyndiktus6 ай бұрын
Best server os... Stocck Debian. Discussion over.
@vestalfa6 ай бұрын
OpenEuler OS
@SirFuseable6 ай бұрын
I just couldn't take any more of your waffling. Here's a tip for you; get to the point and just say what's relevant.
@johnyferreira87336 ай бұрын
Best server OS? 🤔 very subjective but I say it’s Debian!
@gustavinus5 ай бұрын
If it runs Windows, it is not a server.
@lexiaontube6 ай бұрын
Offering WIndows is like sending ppl to their doom !!!
@pilotken86855 ай бұрын
will be using esxi 7 forever. will accept no support
@richardbennett43655 ай бұрын
Bhyve. Robust, powerful, and easy to use.
@richardbennett43655 ай бұрын
Also Apple hypervisor. Runs macOS, WindosOS, and Linux.