BIG 40K Rules Reveals - Tournament Pack Leaks Changes EARLY? Aquilons Nerfed!

[@auspextactics]

Apparently the Fervent Acclamation ALREADY has an FAQ that states it works for stratagems (seems to have been added in the last errata). So this one is actually also clarifying that it works for enhancements too. Thanks for spotting that!

[@Bumbaclart247]

It was in the last MFM - found in the index cards

[@dickjohnson1461]

GW, how is this document so hard to find that I have to wait for the KZbinrs to link a copy?

[@troublemaker9899]

If I'm reading the wording correctly, for the Death Guard, it will only generate Nurgle's Gift while you are "In Control" of the objective. Therefore if you lose control but you kill the enemy off of it, it will be considered Infected, but will not generate Nurgle's Gift until you control it again.

[@thingsthatgobomb]

I think it generates the aura as long as the opponent doesn't control it, whether you control it or not doesnt matter so long as its been infected

[@ANDELE3025]

@@thingsthatgobomb As written from both rules text and FAQ: "that objective marker is said to be Infected and remains under your control even if you have no models within range of it, until your opponent controls it at the start or end of any turn", the infection marker is cleansed at those points, but not on markets if their loss of control happened in phases between the points when infection status/cleanse is checked for at end/start of turns.

[@joshpries9376]

Is anyone really surprised Aquilons are getting nerfed? They were insane for their price.

[@Ezrol1994]

Honestly it came faster than I was expecting but otherwise yeah was definately a when not an if

[@hexzinggaming5040]

I think this is how they thought it was going to work from the start but being GW they just didn’t play test it and forgot people would use them in weird and inventive ways. I really think GW makes datasheets and they think about how they want people to use them but forget to limit the rules on how you can use them letting you do broken things. Definitely not a surprise and knew there would probably be some points changes at the very least. It’s good that they changed the rule without fundamentally changing them and getting rid of 3 inch deep strike.

[@im_flat]

Being able to completely cuck a charge with them was game-breakingly stupid and I am beyond glad it is gone

[@dankvu]

​@@hexzinggaming5040 what sucks is it likely is already printed in the new Codex without this FAQ already, but idk how manufacturing works

[@foxnut13]

No, and anyone who plays Guard(like me) that says yes is lying 😂 10 guys, 3in DS with Turret, Grenades, and Specials, and they are 90 points 🔥🔥🔥

[@huskerdevil24]

The fervent is just a clarification that works for strats AND enhancements

[@huskerdevil24]

Stratagems were addressed in the last erratta

[@auspextactics]

Ah thanks for the heads up there, that makes sense. I'll post a pinned comment above :)

[@Bonesawisready926]

Where is the eratta? I don't see one for Templars on the community site

[@Bumbaclart247]

@@Bonesawisready926it was in the index cards last update

[@huskerdevil24]

@@Bonesawisready926 it's in the index cards eratta under Black Templars

[@baval5]

Im glad they fixed the rules contradiction on Hellblasters, but its still an errata that theyre disguising as an FAQ.

[@ANDELE3025]

Stop calling rules updates errata. Errata means grammatical fixes.

[@baval5]

@@ANDELE3025 An errata is a update in printing or writing to fix mistakes. Changing a rule because it wasnt balanced is an errata, the imbalance is the mistake.

[@ANDELE3025]

@@baval5 Incorrect. Errata (Erratum technically as the errata is the individual edits) is the act of correcting or releasing a corrected version of a text with grammatical errors. A correction (or corrigendum) is a the release of a corrected version where the mistake happened due to authors writing mistake, despite intent otherwise laid out clearly, slipping past editors. And a (in this case rules) update/Nth edition/new id reprint are official revision(s) which takes post release information into account.

[@baval5]

@@ANDELE3025 That is actually incorrect. An errata is used to fix any mistake caused by the publisher, while a corrigendum is a mistake caused by the author. Neither is limited to or excludes grammatical errors. Strictly speaking a rules mistake would indeed be a corrigendum, but as GW is also the publisher either can be used. And since the term errata has been used colloquially for rules updates in tabletop games for decades, being pedantic about an archaic definition is asinine.

[@matthewgagnon9426]

@@ANDELE3025 Errata has a different meaning in games. Stop being a grammar nerd if you're going to be wrong on several levels. Literally no one aside from the people deepest in archaic grammar knows what a corrigendum is, and using it at all makes you look like an asshole. It's like how "Are these they" is a grammatically correct sentence but you look like a jackass if you ever say that.

[@nimric3348]

Guard player here: These are healthy aquillion changes. I hope they are generous on the points. 100 points sounds fair. After that we really have better options. People won't like it either way we compare aquillions to artillery. Less aquillions=more artillery

[@sundownwargames]

100%

[@hoppou748]

14:45 So units arriving from reserves also would not trigger these the rules that allow a reactive move then? Because that unit arriving from reserves “has not made a normal move, it only counts as having made one.”

[@KillsXUnited]

Yes, units being set up on the battlefield don't trigger reactive moves as they just "count" as having made a normal move not actually done one. However you can still over watch as overwatch also says "when set up on the battlefield"

[@hoppou748]

@ thanks for verifying. I am aware of the overwatch bit because I tend to use a lot of deep strike rules, but I’ve limited opportunities to play, and I’ve not come up against many units with the reactive move rule. I was under the impression that they could, so it’s good to know.

[@davidgantenbein9362]

About terraforming: GW states that it’s impossible to start to terraform while an enemy unit is CURRENTLY terraforming the objective. But that means it’s absolutely possible to shoot a unit off the table and then start the terraforming action as the enemy unit no longer fulfills the CURRENTLY requirement and terraforming can be started at any point in the shooting phase. I doubt that any decent opponent will argue that his dead unit is still performing the action.

[@tman2902]

Aqs just prove that the rules writers have never met each other or played the game together

[@stephenball-qo7ug]

GW we going to make a OP unit, Unit sells now nerf.

[@IsacCivil]

@@stephenball-qo7ugit’s Meta

[@jamiep9991]

​@IsacCivil it's planned Meta, they have the power to give the units any ability or rules they want, and they choose to make it broken on release to boost sales.

[@DennisW91]

@@jamiep9991 thats pretty much conspiracy theory right here. DW-Knights were the most anticipated release this year and they sucked for what 6(?) month straight before getting buffed? And Vindicators are meta right now, those models are older than 95% of the playerbase, hardly a planned meta.

[@eskhaphey2873]

GW not playtesting or proof reading rules has been apparent since 8th came out XD

[@vishes47]

They addressed strats in the last faq. This one is just answering that question for emhancements.

[@Celt1389]

Keep it up with your videos. I bought black/green Auspex Tactics dice, I love how they feel and roll.

[@Demigodish4o3]

Im very thankful for the Pariah Nexus card clarifications

[@cartwright290]

Kaldor Draigo had to use his ability when he declared a charge. If you declared it and rolled a 9 inch out of deep strike it was wasted. Now you can pocket it, HUGE BUFF

[@jean-philippecarrier2216]

not sure its the same tho, because the ability says 'when you declare a charge' not 'in your charge phase'

[@cartwright290]

@jean-philippecarrier2216 but you declare your charge in the charge phase...and it says do it whenever you want...so when else are you gonna add to your charge?

[@jean-philippecarrier2216]

@@cartwright290 I think you misinterpreting with the FAQ for the chaos knight where they say you can do it ater the charge roll because in this stratagem it said "in the charge phase" so in can be anytime. Contrary to the ability of Kaldor who says "when you declare a charge" implying that you cant do it after. The FAQ for Kaldor was just to say that you can use his ability anytime in the game thats it... (So nothing to do with the FAQ for the chaos knight. It would have, however, if in the text saying "in the charge phase" , which it doesnt.)

[@PaintCelestine]

Dark Angels watcher change now allows you to use it vs start of phase Mortals, like Doombolt.

[@caramelcrunchy9927]

Aquilons getting nerfed is coming to nobodies surprise. Mkay? They are insanely good for their pricetag and the only people mad about them getting worse is the people who abuse them.

[@ironwarriorhonsou9303]

Interesting choices. I do feel Guard really need something to make basic guard functional, not relying on gimmick units after the repeated blows to anything but tank spam

[@josephrogers4246]

I feel like being able to use Fire Overwatch or Heroic Intervention while still performing an action does makes sense in a way. Both are in response to what your opponent is doing, rather than your unit initiating the activity. They already spent their turn getting set up, now they just have to defend it.

[@jimmydesouza4375]

They still haven’t given Kasrkin the ability to order themselves while in transports. Big sad.

[@Klierowski]

Why would they? Such rules don't work in transports.

[@jimmydesouza4375]

@@Klierowski Why would they give an exception that allows a unit designed to rush up the board in transports and get cheeky first round shooting off the capability to use their datasheet ability while pushing up the board in transports? Well gee willy bob, I guess I don't know!

[@oliverp3545]

Because no other army gets such benefits like that, like should Tau be allowed to spot out of transports?

[@jimmydesouza4375]

​@@oliverp3545 What on earth are you talking about? Multiple armies get benefits like that. Even the guard gets this very same benefit on all of their officer units. The kasrkin are the exception, because their self order comes from its own rule rather than from the voice of command faction rule, despite the fact that this seems to be the entire purpose of their unit. Please if you do not even know how guard orders work, don't try to argue with me, yah?

[@oliverp3545]

@jimmydesouza4375 yeah and do you think GW stood by that decision for commands in transports or just a bandaid buff for Guard? It goes against the design intent of the game that some units get to do it.

[@WraithRaider]

You can't heroic intervention during an action as the movement restriction does not have the same "until end of turn" that shooting has.

[@oinked]

Troops in Rapid Ingressing transports cannot disembark... Cue drop pod arguments.

[@Lumovanis]

The grenade clarification for aquilons is desperately needed apparently as most people seem to be doing it despite grenade being worded pretty clearly.

[@MrHoneuma]

The Knights of Shade thing isn't actually new, but I don't think it had been written down. I want to say I learned it from an Art of War stream and checked with a friend who used to TO to confirm.

[@mentok1]

Glad to see the DC Dreadnought syrge move gettibg thst minor change to bring it in line with others.

[@ProxyHammer1]

It’s a good time to be an Eldar player! 😊

[@jimmydesouza4375]

Has it ever not been a good time to be Eldar? I can't think of any time off the top of my head where you guys were bad, you're always either top tier or average as far as I can remember.

[@ProxyHammer1]

@@jimmydesouza4375 I can think of several large spans of time that the Eldar were unplayable competitively and difficult to play casually because of the immense age and lack of proper model kits. You wouldn't know unless you played Eldar unfortunately...

[@jimmydesouza4375]

@@ProxyHammer1 I have absolutely any interest in anything but regular humans. Even the space marines don't interest me. I like the idea of regular flesh and blood defeating cosmic horrors. Can you give an example of what you think was the most severe span of time either in terms of sheer length or in terms of how little usable units you had?

[@ProxyHammer1]

@ Absolutely! Most of 5th edition with a 4th edition codex (about 2 years), 4th edition (before we got our 4th edition codex) which was also several years, and 8th/9th edition when we were using just our index. I still played them though despite that and had a blast but they were one of the worst factions in the game at those times. Only faction that was probably worse was nids in 5th edition.

[@jimmydesouza4375]

@@ProxyHammer1 So you guys get the no codex treatment a lot too then? I'd always assumed that was GW punishing guard players for not playing marines.

[@dragunov01234]

FAQ about transport using Rapid Ingress, What happen if I use Rapid ingress on Tyrannocyte or droppod? Will unit inside them die cuz they cannot disembark?

[@jacket2848]

The datasheet addresses this. Your datasheet rule of "can" beats core rules of "can't"

[@DmanDrums]

If only only GW sold tiny violins, they’d make a killing from guard players.

[@StarkMaximum]

Auspex didn't you _literally_ just release a video about how good Aquilons are

[@WraithRaider]

The funniest one is that now if you rapid ingress a drop pod in turn 2, you both cannot and must disembark

[@AngelusSperi]

So... what happens if you Rapid Ingress a Drop Pod??? Normally the unit must disembark when the pod enters, but now there is a rule saying they cannot disembark. Does this result in models being stuck in the pod? Or does Drop Pod Assault overrule this FAQ?

[@MrUdarr]

Glad to see the DC Dreadnought clarification. But when does this changes goes "live"? Because a friend says all this changes are only for the tournament? it would be weird to only allow the DC Dread to move into engagement range for the Event

[@stephendarkman576]

I guess if the Overwatch strat works for a unit doing an action, then Heroic Intervention works too?

[@Antidisinformation]

What happens to drop pods? The drop pod's own rules insist that you MUST disembark once the drop pod is set up on the battlefield.

[@SteveB182]

General Vs specific rules. The specific ones are true for the thing they refer to (drop pods in this case), everything else uses the general rule.

[@maxbrooks5468]

Honestly this just built up more hype for Deathwatch for me!

[@grapetonenatches186]

You had to tell everyone about the Aqualungs.

[@Irencor]

Thanks for all the infos. Always love your Videos.

[@Majere613]

I'd be a little more interested in the WCW if the last game ended with Sting powerbombing his opponent through the table due to a booking error.

[@HooDie-Trench-GoTh2022]

Index states about fervent acclamation FAQ, stratagems , enhancements etc

[@osogitzgraymane72]

technically, if you are using the App, the aquilons cant use their abilities anyways. They do not have the Deep Strike ability.

[@shadowlink025]

Interesting to see nothing in there for sisters, given the whole we are looking at miracle dice usage.

[@Lowlandlord]

So, terraforming is like pie? Limited availability?

[@shadowywarrior]

i don't understand the FAQ for consolidation....base to base already with the objective marker in the middle, so its talking about 3 inches right? they told us we don't have physical objective markers in the middle of those anymore...are we bringing it back?

[@prestonasullivan]

If I won the December giveaway, would I be allowed to wait to order minis until the release of Emperor's Children next year?

[@stephenwitham]

Wonder about Rapid ingress on a drop pod ?

[@nicholasd7107]

None of these rules are in play CURRENTLY unless you are going to that tournament. Remember that at your local gaming stores.

[@SoulCrusherEx]

Oh no what a surprise! Kinda sad ngl but oh well

[@sphotoburpee]

Not a bad nerf to aquillons. Not going to stop me from taking them. Pretty sure in December they will get a big points increase.

[@mattiasgamin3891]

Aquilons don’t seem to have the DEEPSTRIKE Ability or Keyword in the GW app? If so can they be set up using Deepstrike, even at 9”? Maybe the app is wrong?

[@davidgantenbein9362]

The app is wrong. Their datasheet can be downloaded from Warhammer Community and that version aka the officially published one has Deepstrike on it.

[@Fomfonicus]

Mmmm... The aquilons deep strike nerf should be added to all 3" deepstrikers in my opinion.

[@davidjones4772]

I agree, but at least there are only 2 or 3 units in the whole game with inbuilt 3” deepstrike. Most units do it with a strat which is limited to your movement phase.

[@swheen]

And inceptors were not a must have in every sm list since the start of 10th.

[@dwood268]

You look at the rules something like Aquilons get for 90 points, and you wonder if these people have ever played or watch the game being played before.

[@johnrobertson6302]

So to clarify. If I buy the current printed version of the rule book and codex for my army how many FAQ errata do I need to get from GW’s website? Is it just the most recent one or is it all of them since the rule book was originally published?

[@LordCrate-du8zm]

The most recent ones.

[@Dunkan-3]

When GW will abandonned paper rules ? Or update. Use digital rules web sites.

[@WeDontTalkAboutJosh]

@@Dunkan-3 when it stops being so profitable to sell a whole new range of rulebooks every 3 years.

[@tomtombinks1830]

Damn, they hit aquilons hard and faster than any other broken things I can remember lol

[@kdhlkjhdlk]

Well they were good while they were unavailable.

[@marechal_joukov2375]

6:57 i eared baby 😂 not maybe ! Hés defenetly a real human ! xD

[@Trolley_Connoisseur]

im so lost, so once DG infect an OBJ, its infected all game? then also if the opponents loses it, dg dont get the obj but it gets the aura?

[@jacket2848]

Yes. You're not lost, you nailed it haha

[@galling2052]

good stuff overall.

[@gingraham9779]

So melee army's are whining about screening?

[@theirishasian5490]

So, can you just not rapid ingress drop pods anymore with the not being able to disembark, the embarked unity would be destroyed

[@MrDefender1234]

OK I get the Aquilon Nerf.. (though it is sad since I was about to field some tomorrow in a game and they got nerfed before I could try them lmao) but can the Inceptors still do this? They better be nerfing this across the Board and not just for Aquilons... >:(

[@jamesloder8652]

Aquilons nerfed before I've even gotten to use mine...

[@TheCommunistColin]

They're still very good, they were just bonkers good before.

[@tjturner4461]

That's what killing my game a stupid exclusive elite tournament pack? Wtf

[@beatooze8025]

Oh Good. Necrons can finaly use grenades... Wait... No? .... 😢

[@KonradCurze-w3o]

Where tyranids buff?

[@vsGoliath96]

Aquilons got nerfed?! Come on, they were already second rate to the Allarus terminators! They didnt deserve this! What's that? GW got lazy with naming again and there's a totally different squad also from an imperial faction named Aquilons? Imagine my shock.

[@notvkn]

give me back my plasma pistols on hellblasters GW

[@598019001]

honestly, Anyone pretending to be mad about the aquilons getting hit are trolling. everyone knows that Aquilons are way to good for their points, and that they were going to be hit. As is, These rules changes feel like a nerf, but only a nerf in the way of stopping them from doing stupid cheesy shit they shouldn't have done anyway.

[@kingkaiju6872]

That hell blasters ability is honestly so stupid and should definitely not work if they blow themselves up 😂 that’s just dumb

[@stephenball-qo7ug]

Maybe the gun instead of pulling the triggers they have to release the trigger finger.

[@slyoldowl]

I never got to use my aquilons hell I never got to play a game

[@spearsage]

Well, you have until december, or until it is applied on the actual dataslate update.

[@Piotrunusus]

As always - bunch of random changes, and hope that it will help the balance.

[@Sirilere]

Why does GW always act after the horses are out of the barn?

[@thorscape3879]

Because they do not have the gift of foresight. Not all interactions are obvious.

[@deanthomas2561]

Better than not at all?

[@Spongemonkey26]

Because they're a model and paint company. The game is secondary.

[@lunawense6288]

They heavily rely on tournament results for balancing rather than using statistics to heavily balance units

[@thorscape3879]

@@lunawense6288 Tournament results are a statistic. Real play is the only way to measure the performance of Aquillons.

[@Arkiham]

So many of these faqs are literally just people trying to abuse the rules in their favour. Like the dg one

[@BillWD]

I can't tell you how sick of 40k rules updates I am. So much so, that I stopped playing 10th a month ago and I've been playing 4th Edition 40k and Necromunda ever since. I may go back to 10th but I need a break. I have been to tournements etc, I'm not just a narrative game player but I'm just sick of constant changes.

[@hannahgeraghty4201]

I can whole heartedly recommend 30k for people who miss the game 40k used to be

[@ZaZi-Zeta01]

The problem comes when people want their esoteric factions that really give the universe its identity (though Heresy to me is still the most interesting) ​@@hannahgeraghty4201

[@supershot9729]

4th edition best ed

[@jimmydesouza4375]

How are you getting 4th ed games? You have a local longbeard community or is it some online thing?

[@BillWD]

@hannahgeraghty4201 yes so I hear, I haven't played it yet but I'm putting together an Emperor's Children army for it.

[@povelvas9710]

I mean... What they were thinking, hwen they wrote Aquilons rules in the forst place? Same with the point changes. Are they so incompitent, so everythime that they add something, they have to fix it asap?

[@ForrestFox]

uhh, wut? You can do consolidation move towards an objective? o_O Where does it say that in the rules? I thought you could only do a consolidation move towards the nearest enemy if you were in engagement range. Im confused..

[@akirakan5086]

Or toward an objective IF you can get the unit onto the objective.

[@Xenocide13]

I think you may want to revisit the fight phase rules! Units are eligible fight if they are in engagement range with an enemy unit OR they made a change move that turn - so if they charged and then the unit they charged died for some reason, they are still eligible to fight. When selected to fight, they pile-in - so they do not need to be in engagement range to pile in, but the unit has to end in engagement range with an enemy unit for the pile-in move to be legal (and a few other caveats). After fighting, the unit can consolidate. Again, the unit does not have to be in engagement range initially. For the consolidate move to be legal the unit has to end the move within engagement range of an enemy unit, or if that is not possible then within range of an objective instead (plus other caveats).

[@ForrestFox]

@@Xenocide13 Yeah, I know about that. But what does consolidation it have to do with moving towards an objective as he speaks of in the video? o_O "When making a consolidation move towards an objective marker".

[@Xenocide13]

@@ForrestFox as my last bit covered, if your unit can't consolidate into engagement range with another enemy unit, it can consolidate into range of an objective marker instead.

[@Damnedlegion40k]

Add a comment...

[@hinti24]

Ok, so, please nerf every single unit in the game that can deepstrike 3" close. People cry too much about 10 dudes with lasguns.

[@eaglestrike211lel2]

HOW ARE YOU POSTING, IT'S 3AM IN THE MORNING! I ONLY SAW THIS BECAUSE I WENT TO THE SHITTER

[@countswagula6150]

Time zones

[@Xenocide13]

​@@countswagula61503 hours ago is still 5am in the UK, where Auspex is.

[@eaglestrike211lel2]

@@countswagula6150 bro I live in the same country as he does IT WAS 3AM WHEN HE POSTED, THERE'S ONLY 1 TIMEZONE

[@countswagula6150]

@ ahh in that case gotta respect man’s grind

[@jacket2848]

Its called scheduling

[@NZDivine]

Hellblasters firing on death when dying from overcharged is such a dumb rule imo. It makes no sense that someone whose weapon has exploded and killed the wielder, can magically fire it again.

[@jamesygamesy5124]

yeah but thats their rule thats their charm half the fun and point is the fire twice

[@Dieonceperday]

It doesn't 'explode' though, otherwise when a unit with more wounds fails gets hot they just wouldn't be able to use the weapon anymore. It just vents all of the heat all over them and they decide, through the fire and flames, that if they're gonna die they might as well die shooting. Death is a great motivator to go above and beyond. It's dumb, and cheesy, and corny, and is absolutely what 40k should be about, imo.

[@supershot9729]

​​@@Dieonceperday bro doesn't know the lore lmao when a plasma gun overheats it blows up, it's been a staple of the game and lore since 3rd edition at least, the hellblasters wouldn't just lose a weapon they would lose a hand and maybe their life, either way they won't be shooting again after that.

[@Xenocide13]

​@@supershot9729please tell the rules writers for any vehicle with a plasma weapon that they shouldn't be allowed to fire it again after it overheats, then.

[@Dieonceperday]

@@supershot9729 Well, according to Lexicanum, sourced from the book "Munitorum: Plasma guns" and from the Only War Core rulebook, they actually release a cloud of superheated vapor, which is usually lethal to the bearer, though the weapon often survives. Weird, that sounds a lot like what I just described.

[@gosuman69]

Of course it gets nerfed 😂😂

[@likeyacutg4720]

Just make rukes for comp and rukes or everyone else ffs. Stop letting comp just piss all over factions. It gets boring real quick

[@Night_Geist]

Aquilons still amazing but at least they can’t do the rapid ingress shenanigans. May still need an adjustment up in points.

[@dantejrl]

GW pls, stop move rules, it's boring -_-

[@BurnByMoonlight]

41 views in only 0 seconds? Auspex really fell off.

[@azuzak]

I wish gw would get rid of hellblasters fighting on death from their own hazardous test. It just seems wrong, always has, and with this ruling it's back to hellblaster shoots, dies, shoots again nonsense.

[@tonybayer2546]

They're a C-tier unit with a gun that's really only good against infantry and is fragile for the points, not only are they easy for your opponent to kill but also easy for you to kill your own.

[@danjones3012]

​@@tonybayer2546not so much. They have great range, damage output even before the idiotic I get to shoot twice bs. If your opponent is killing them is generally because they dont have any other targets or need to protect a forward unit; or the sm player made a mistake in placement/movement.

[@supershot9729]

​@@tonybayer2546 you must just play space marines or something lmao if you played guard you wouldn't be saying that

[@tonybayer2546]

@supershot9729 I have played against Guard with them, they don't do anything to vehicles and against infantry I'm better off with a ton of bolters instead.

[@danjones3012]

@@tonybayer2546 I see the problem, you are using them against chaff. And guard isnt even a good marker for them against, cheap and hordeish. Against other armies they are quite overpowered for their cost. Take necron infantry for example, elite point cost but literally half the wounds as comparable non-necron units and all of a sudden that "c-tier" unit of yours is "s-tier" because they will wipe the whole necron squad which costs almost double yours.

[@Cross_Malaki]

Update doesn't fix T'au, don't care.

[@konnermccoy9348]

First here

[@wlof-l4c]

SECOND

[@maneco104]

FIRST 😃

[@DreadQuinn]

This dude grasping for views..lol..

[@tap037]

Lol, i literally sold my aquilons to a guy who wanted to use them for his IG like a day ago🤣🤣 good for me i guess

[@Klierowski]

Good change Aquillons, they were insane good plus too cheap.

[@maneco104]

FIRST 😃