Big Brother Has A Visit From Big Brother

Big Brother is voluntary. Nobody forces anybody to go on it. The people filmed have asked to be filmed. The real Big Brother is a certain auditor who hypocritically hides behind a camera.
Footage is copyright of DJ Audits, Marti Blagborough, Laina and UK Security College, used here under fair dealing.
DJ Audits’ footage:
-“UK Big Brother House 2023 Security Try To Intimidate Drone Operator / Citizen Journalist”):
• UK Big Brother House 2...
-“Can You Please Stop It?”:
• Can You Please Stop It...
DJ Audits KZbin Channel:
/ @djaudits
Marti Blagborough’s footage:
-“Listen Muhammad Calm Down”:
• Listen Muhammad Calm Down
-“Get Your F*&%£#! Hands Off Me with @DJAUDITS”:
• Get Your F*&%£#! Hands...
My previous video with my view on the requirement to have SIA badges on display (“Show Your Badge For BP Visits”):
• Show Your Badge For BP...
TRAINING ON USE OF RADIO FOR SECURITY OPERATIVES IN THE PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY:
• TRAINING ON USE OF RAD...
Recital 18 of the UK GDPR (The Domestic Purposes Exemption):
www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/...
Part 5, Schedule 2 of the Data Protection Act 2018 (The Special Purposes Exemption):
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Article 4 of the UK GDPR:
gdpr-info.eu/art-4-gdpr/
Article 13 of the UK GDPR:
gdpr-info.eu/art-13-gdpr/
Article 17 of the UK GDPR:
gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/
Article 21 of the UK GDPR:
gdpr-info.eu/art-21-gdpr/
Regulation 2 of the Data Protection (Charges and Information) Regulations 2018:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/...
Schedule 3 of The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016:
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2...
Section 48(1) of the Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Section 9 of the Private Security Industry Act 2001:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Section 4 of the Private Security Industry Act 2001:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
The Private Security Industry Act 2001 (Licences) Regulations 2007:
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2...
Schedule 9 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Article 8 of Schedule 1 to the Human Rights Act 1998:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Article 17 of Schedule 1 to the Human Rights Act 1998:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
ENFORCEMENT: What to expect from the SIA (August 2018):
assets.publishing.service.gov...
Bernstein v Skyviews & General Ltd [1977] EWHC QB 1
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/...
Section 76 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Section 68 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Article 4 of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/947:
www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/20...
Article 241 of The Air Navigation Order 2016:
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2...
Article 265 of The Air Navigation Order 2016
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2...
Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
JB Fanvideo:
• JB Fanvideo
Channel Theme:
Music:- ASHUTOSH - Utopia
Watch:- • ASHUTOSH - Utopia
www.ashutoshmusic.com/music

[@babettesfeast6347]

He explodes everytime someone tries to film him and his company. Massive hypocrisy

[@stevietrucker4631]

Kermit the frog 😂😂 I'll defend myself if you come any closer, he's all mouth and no action.

[@v8cool231]

Always makes me laugh when he tells security people to 'get back to work' . They are doing their work. They're security guards. He moans at them when they do their work.

[@Cuckie1996]

DJ Audits, Marti Blagborough and Auditing Britain are the three biggest Knob Ends in auditing right now.

[@7king8debs79]

DJE, Meet the Tyrants and the laughing bellend...and the idiot who Ryan. All up for the title of worst auditor.

[@malakhiedwardsjohn5252]

Sorry to admit I used to enjoy DJ audits videos now you've opened my eyes, I have un-subscribed his channel.

[@mdmoore100]

Only just had the chance to get to the end of this one. Another excellent in-depth analysis of this unnecessary invasion of privacy 🙄

[@exsubmariner]

Thank you for posting this video I feel well armed now to post comments on his KZbin channel

[@User-3O3]

Sourcing a device which allows him to listen in on private conversations shows he doesn't give a 💩about anyone's privacy. If someone hacked his own personal mobile phone and leaked all his texts or tapped it to listen in on all his conversations, he would have a hissy fit.

[@mikespikeey4625]

they using pmr radios Frequencies that can be monitored without fear of prosecution include radio, TV broadcasts, amateur radio transmissions and a wide range of overseas transmissions on the short wave bands. Short wave signals often originate overseas and normally consist of commercial, military, news service and marine transmissions.SO HE NOT HACKED ANYTHING PMR IS NOT A PHONE

[@ShinyHelmet]

I wonder if they stock those cheapo walkie talkies at AC Adapters R Us? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@richrichie378]

Even DJ audits speaks down and condisending to David the drone, which is obscure.

[@kindcitizen-oe5ck]

Its surprising to me that more and more people do not just turn up at his place of business and film his site, or even get a few sandwiches out and have a picnic outside the front of it.

[@VictheSecret]

'I'll defend myself' Of course you will. Perhaps by throwing your handbag at the nasty man?

[@ianvarty8064]

If no one approaches him then he has not got a show, please let companies know.

[@SirD83]

Why don’t his workplace address get published and people keep filming him? The one video I’ve seen he didn’t like that one bit.

[@TheePunisher]

Unit 1, Barrington Business Park, Leycroft Rd, Leicester LE4 1ET

[@camron.w1841]

You need so much more attention! There is little to no coverage of Frauditors being called out for their scrupulous behavior KZbin needs more people like you to educate people about these pondscum. Do you think that any of the hardworking individuals being harassed could play copyrighted music to sabotage a fruaditor?

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@camron.w1841 Unfortunately the idea of playing copyrighted music won't work, for three reason: first, incidental music is not a breach of copyright; second, if it's background music, it won't trigger KZbin's copyright ID block on monetisation; and, three, if all else fails, any auditor could easily mute it or play something over it during editing.

[@rocco6t9]

Ive watched a marti blagbrough video with him and dj in .i noticed every time dj was on film he was blurred out. I wonder why that was

[@kindcitizen-oe5ck]

Its weird too, as his face is literally all over the internet and its not blurred out on any of his videos on his other channel.

[@robatkinson8581]

Why does he call it you toooob? Is he American 🤣

[@williamgeorgefraser]

On the subject of receiving radio messages, many years ago I was living in the south of France. One Sunday afternoon, I suddenly heard voices in my living room. When I went in to find out what was happening, I discovered that my radio, which was switched off, was picking up police messages. Never found out how this could happen.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Two possible causes for that are: 1. You lived near a transmitter and your radio picked up signals even when off. 2. Your amplifier was issuing faulty output when off. Until the 1990s, it was easy to scan police radio here in the UK and when I was a boy it was the thing everybody did. Then they encrypted it, which ended that. Not sure what the position is in France.

[@auditpundit1199]

RF harmonics.

[@user-rb3rj4dk9l]

DJ seems to be hanging out with Marty Blagbourough a lot these days, I wonder if Marty can pronounce the word Auchtermuchty or Weesht. Prosecute these bams!

[@three-phase562]

I do find it amusing that DJ Audits tells people that it is down to them to create their own privacy and yet when someone turned up at his business he found himself in the same boat and didn't have a mask to put on. No working person really goes around prepared to protect their privacy, they rely on others to behave in a reasonable manner towards them and not infringe on their privacy. There is no real legitimate need to zoom in on to identity cards in the manner he did.

[@JohnMalcolm]

The justification used by these so-called, self-appointed auditors is pretty lame and falls apart at the slightest examination. Take the photographer's rights defence. If they were conducting the type of normal photography amateur and professional photographers engage in they might have an arguement. Maybe there's a niche group of photographers who enjoy taking photos of businesses and sites on industrial estates that need their rights defended... But i very much doubt it. The DWP Job Centre ones always make me laugh too. I personally believe that customers, or whatever DWP calls them, should be entitled to audio and video record appointments or meetings they are having with DWP staff... How fuckwits wandering around the public areas filming leaflets and winding up minimum wage security staff will further that is beyond me.

[@ianvarty8064]

Can a member of the public claim monies off the auditor

[@andrewforrester8386]

"If you come close I'll defend myself" don't make me laugh. One punch, this "auditor" would be out cold

[@tomalex4806]

I think next time Big Brother is back on in January there will more than likely be a drone restriction zone per request of the production company to the CAA. Surprised that wasn't done already

[@streetvideoreviewer]

I didn't realise they could do that. Would that be an 'authorisation zone' or a restriction zone proper?

[@tomalex4806]

​​@@streetvideorevieweryeah I'm pretty sure they can request it, and probably a restriction zone then again it would maybe only last temporarily whilst the show is on which is normally for 6 weeks or so. Who knows

[@mdmoore100]

⁠@@tomalex4806I’m fairly sure they’d have done it if they could. It can be done for airshows etc but maybe only for safety reasons otherwise every person with enough money could just block drones over their house forever and that doesn’t seem to happen.

[@davidupton3175]

I had just come across a video of yours about an auditor and his complete lack of knowledge on trespass, his swearing at a manager for asking him to leave private land, and also his mockery at the managers appearance and physical make up, and his incitement to cause breach of the peace. I am subscribed to this auditor and, after witnessing this behaviour, am now unsubscribing. Also subscribed to another who is very deceitful towards his subscribers,let alone the subject of his audits. This is because I was ignorant of the laws concerning auditing,but thanks to you im a bit wiser now and won't subscribe to Deceit or downright troublemakers. Keep up this work and others will see through these plastic people.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Comments like yours keep me going. Thank you.

[@williamgeorgefraser]

Where DJ Audits comes from "brain cells" is pronounced "brain sales". He's sold his. Surely, if the security guard turns his badge to hide his details, he is still displaying the badge even though he is not showing his personal information. Likewise, could the badge not be put in a cover which shows only that it is an official badge but hides personal information?

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Yes, the badge can be in a cover as you state and is compliant, and door supervisors often display their badges in that way. However, it's not just the personal information, in my view it's the simple fact that he is SIA-licensed that could arguably be an infringement of privacy if broadcast to all the world. It's a further bit of information that helps identify him and a prompt for some nutter to make a complaint to the SIA.

[@tomalex4806]

​​​@@streetvideoreviewerAlso as the SIA have an open public register which SIA license numbers, expiry dates, sector and role, name and status of the licence are displayed. So for example: Joe Blogs Number XXXXXXXX Sector Door Supervisor Role Front line Expiry January 2025 Status Suspended. I think that's how it goes anyway haven't looked in ages. I've seen Marti share someone's license details just by simply getting a still of the persons license and putting it into the SIA website. Which is a popular way of getting a complaint raised. The only thing which the SIA don't share is the photo on the card itself

[@cabbagetv2883]

The whole point of having the badge with details on display is so you can note their details if they have acted unprofessionially or gone beyond their limited powers . If it was only a cover that said 'official' on it and they assaulted you , do you really think they would give you their details upon request afterwards ? They need to be held accountable as a public body with powers , like the police etc do

[@AlbaHistory]

Personally I think the laws need to change when It comes to Auditors and channel's like that they have no care or concern for the people who might not want to be filmed For example what if someone is filmed who has experienced abuse in their past and maybe the reason they don't want filmed is because they've had to move to get away from that part of their past auditors don't think about situations like that all they care about is themselves.

[@rogerbroadbelt3424]

I have often wondered how these auditors get away with posting peoples audio and video who dont wish to be posted. Ch5 were heavily fined for this, this is why Ch5 now blurrs some peoples faces on their reality programs. So how do these auditors get away with it? "I dont wish my picture posted anywhere" "You'll be on KZbin this evening" Praps KZbin allow these videos because they make money from the adverisers. I wouldnt wish my SIA licence details or any other ID card details to be filmed and posted on here as these auditors do.

[@tophatanimation8748]

They hide behind domestic legislation but in reality, as soon as they monetize the videos then there's a commercial element to the videos which requires them to register as data-controllers. This channel repeatedly mentions this but not enough 'victims' of these audits seem to pursue this.

[@mdmoore100]

He’s on very thin ice here commercially. BB is a big revenue generator and his actions have caused consequential loss (lock down). Criminal Offences aside, if the production company can demonstrate that revenue has been lost (and I would suggest it can) as a result of his overly intrusive filming and drone flight then I’d be pretty worried about civil legal action if I were him. The Wireless Telegraphy Act will be the least of his worries! To even defend yourself against these media companies in court could easily run into tens of thousands, and to risk losing the case to pay damages and the other sides costs is very stupid indeed. You’re effectively putting your house at risk. They will not mess about if you disrupt their revenue stream and are likely to have a fairly sharp commercial litigation team. DJ isn’t silly and I wonder if that’s why he buggered off sharpish when they told him the house was in lockdown because of him. I’d genuinely be a bit worried if I were him.

[@darrenhunter2324]

If the scanner is a Uniden 125xlt or the 75xl they can pick up PMR signals transmitted in the clear. They are preprogrammed with them. I have a 125XLT I use for ATC and Marian bands. As I understand it I am legal on those frequency. But of he using a Bofan radio and eves dropping on security as much as I remember when I worked in the radio industry he have to program the radio with the correct frequency and colour code (Encryption) and he done that then he is most definitely committing a criminal act.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

I was into amateur radio when younger. I did refresh my knowledge prior to making this video. The way that OFCOM interpret the law today is that a transmission on public frequency is only considered 'general reception' if it is a licensed broadcast to the public (BBC and commercial radio) or amateur radio or CB radio. Otherwise equipment and frequency are irrelevant considerations to law. If the transmission is considered 'private' and is not CB or amateur radio, anybody intentionally eavesdropping is committing the offence under section 48(1)(a). In this case, DJ Audits tuned to the radio transmissions by security and listened in. He then realised that two different channels were being operated (I would assume one by the in-house team, the other by contractors) and made efforts to find out what the other frequency was. He then by chance picked up radio transmissions amongst staff inside the building. All of this was intentional eavesdropping. He definitely broke the law.

[@Nathan1975Liggy]

@@streetvideoreviewer WOW you was into Ham Radio when younger. Did you pass the exam? if so what is or was your callsign?. Im an ham radio operator at intermediate level and my callsign is 2E0LIG

[@digitalanaloguehamradio]

The uniden xlt 125 has the feature close call where it picks up and locks onto extremely strong signals nearby even if the frequency is not known beforehand .If using this method, he could argue that the channel was not programmed it and it was picked up by accident. The frequencies he is picking up are analoge FM. and the tones used are ctcss And are not considered encryption.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@@digitalanaloguehamradio Yes, point taken, but he didn't happen on the transmissions accidentally or inadvertently, he was purposefully scanning. Furthermore, even if we say - as a hypothetical - that it was accidental, it was still an offence because he continued to listen in full knowledge of what it was. Quite apart from all that, he then committed a further offence in that he broadcast what he was listening to, to his own viewers.

[@MarkBowenPiano]

As much as I think these 'auditors' are obviously just doing it to annoy people and get a reaction that they can film I'm not sure why they need to register as a data controller? Could you show that part in the GDPR rules that states why he needs to? Thanks.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Regulation 2 of the Data Protection (Charges and Information) Regulations 2018. It should actually in the video and in other videos of mine. It's also in the video description. I always quote the law.

[@Alan_Watkin]

i do love love these, had to come back to get the last 10min... 👏👏👏

[@mdmoore100]

I think this one has gone from his channel? Not sure when it was though?

[@kindcitizen-oe5ck]

Its still there, I think it was uploaded a few months ago.

[@mdmoore100]

@@kindcitizen-oe5ck yeah it is you’re right, unfortunately I didn’t go back far enough. Surprised the staff didn’t make a privacy complaint? Maybe they aren’t that bothered?

[@tophatanimation8748]

@@mdmoore100 A company making a programme called 'Big Brother' probably wouldn't make a complaint due to the bad publicity it would bring. That said, others should do.

[@mdmoore100]

@@tophatanimation8748 yeah fair point. Although I’m still surprised they haven’t brought a civil claim for damages if his actions caused filming to be disrupted.

[@colinpenfold9890]

In the Sate of NSW a security Guard must display his license above waist high and clearly displayed and must show it to anyone he has contact section 35 and 36 of the security industry act 1997. So DJ has the law right for the wrong country.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

To be fair, he does have the letter of the law right for the UK, but I'm not convinced it could be fairly enforced in these circumstances, where basically the SIA-licensed individual is being harangued by a nutter.

[@colinpenfold9890]

I believe the SIA would just give a security Guard a caution and wouldn’t prosecute.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@@colinpenfold9890 Sort of, yes. It wouldn't be a formal police caution, it would be a letter of advice or a written warning/reprimand type of letter.

[@colinpenfold9890]

At the end of day it’s the security companies and training providers that are at fault here. In regard to the studio the Gaurds maybe close protection or in house. With regards to DJ notice how when he comes into contact with a film crew he likes to big note himself as this media personality.

[@speedtriplerider7853]

Brillianr as usual. Thanks for all your work in bringing these frauditors into the spotlight.

[@steppastyleuk]

Lol

[@Alan_Watkin]

the security guy who comes over to him at about 37mins could well be a resettled asylum seeker and his request not to be in the video could be because it could put his life in danger to be identified/found, thats what i thought when i first watched this the other week, even what the 2 lady's at towards the end are saying seems to back that up for me

[@robertreed4337]

I enjoy your output but do wonder why no-one has prosecuted

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Various reasons, such as nobody other than me realising, nobody knowing where to report it (OFCOM is the primary investigating/prosecuting authority for radio offences, not the police/CPS), nobody bothering to report it because it's not serious enough, lack of time/other things to do, etc., etc. Personally, I prioritise making these videos over reporting things because I believe that spreading awareness/education will defeat this activity in the long run.

[@robertreed4337]

@@streetvideoreviewer I am very surprised that Amazon have not taken action against him where he humiliated the security guards, took the managers photo from the wall display and showed the world who they are. I would have thought that Amazon would have stood by their staff better than they have done

[@atlanticx100]

Would filming a commercial film set be copyright infringement?

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@atlanticx100 I assume your question relates to filming from the public highway. If your vantage point is from an area of private land where you depend on permission for access, then the landowner/occupier could impose whatever conditions they wish on your filming activity. From the public highway, it depends what the film set consists of. Buildings are protected by copyright under English law but there is a specific exception under section 62 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 which permits you to take a photograph or film of a building without infringing its copyright. This means that you do not require the permission of the owners of the copyright in a building to make a film or take a photograph of it. That probably covers most of what is found on 'film sets'. On the other hand, art work, trade marks, symbols, etc. used in a film set are protected by copyright (as well as trade mark, and may also be registered designs). If you film those in such a way that it is not purely incidental and is intended to exploit the copyrighted material for your own gain, then possibly there could be a breach of copyright (and/or trade mark infringement, passing-off, design infringement). I don't believe DJ Audits' filming of the Big Brother set could be described as incidental. It's not as if he was filming from a significant height for the purpose of capturing a general recording of the site, he was low enough to see details, was zooming in, and clearly was filming with the intention of capturing the set. I'm not sure that would amount to an infringement of intellectual property rights, though, and that notion didn't occur to me as I watched what he was doing.

[@matthewking-kv7sf]

Great work DJ 😂

[@RedPillRachel]

I like your commentary and I don't like auditors like DJ "Audits", but I do think that the GDPR is draconian and over-reaching legislation designed to keep incumbents gatekeepers in place, and the little man from using lawfully acquired footage, in other words, it doesn't just affect "auditors", it affects everyone, just isn't yet enforced as written. Thank heavens. I just hope using it to prevent "auditing" doesn't affect other lawful evidence gathering in personal, business or public interest.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@RedPillRachel I've come to the view that the data protection regime we currently have is about right. On its face, it seems Draconian, but on closer examination most of it is just common sense and reflects a need for due consideration for others. If you gave me your personal information as part of some sort of business and I then passed on your information to others without your consent, you'd be upset with me. If I film you at your place of work without a legitimate reason to do so and you object and I go ahead and upload the video anyway, you should have recourse in that situation and I should be required to justify myself if I'm infringing your privacy. To me, it's just sensible.

[@RedPillRachel]

@@streetvideoreviewer it may well be right for these examples, we both agree there, I am worried about future overreach, protest footage with people walking past the camera, for example.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@@RedPillRachel If someone walks past a camera and is captured incidentally in a camera shot in a protest, demonstration or other crowded context, that will often not be regarded as 'personal data' in the first place, and even where it is, it will usually be possible to invoke a statutory exemption from most of the data protection requirements. In the case of a protest, the exemption would be journalism. Not a blanket exemption, but it relieves the photographer of the more onerous requirements.

[@RedPillRachel]

@@streetvideoreviewer This reply does nothng to allay my legitimate concern, there are plenty of people misbehaving in publc who don't want to be filmed doing so, and will use any law they can to suppress those who would reveal them for what they are. Murderous Islamists ranting, showing their core values, and likely the future of the UK, for example. Controversial, but true.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@@RedPillRachel But what you're describing normally comes under journalism, which is exempt from most data protection requirements.

[@davidflanagan2194]

These people have snitches that provide information for them. Some have said they will pay for this information 🤔 If you fly a drone over a work site causing alarm/stress should a accident happen who is responsible 🤔 His reply that's nothing to do with me. My activity is totally legal get lost. Like shoving your video camera through a hotel window that is open. reason - In public you have NO right to privacy 🤔 and posting this on social media 😡I'm right your not get lost.

[@chrispack3131]

I agree & like what DJ Audits does.. I disagree with your perspective of what he does!

[@stevejones8392]

So basically because you don’t like the law you disagree? It’s not a perspective, it’s the uk law.

[@KalebsRevenge]

it's still not illegal to record people in public and you are the worst at misrepresenting laws

[@KalebsRevenge]

before you ask "1.5 The journalism exemption applies if you: use personal data for journalism; • act “with a view to publication”; • reasonably believe that publishing is in the public interest; and • reasonably believe that complying with a specific part of data protection law is incompatible with journalism." journos don't have to comply in the way you claim.

[@KalebsRevenge]

before you ask "1.5 The journalism exemption applies if you: use personal data for journalism; • act “with a view to publication”; • reasonably believe that publishing is in the public interest; and • reasonably believe that complying with a specific part of data protection law is incompatible with journalism." journos don't have to comply in the way you claim.

[@Windscreen.tech1]

How would this compare to all the cameras in society of today and facial recognition cameras? or is that something completely different, I wouldn’t know myself

[@Jimb0b1111]

@@KalebsRevenge He isn't a journo, he sells AC adapters and annoys people with a camera to get content for his YT channel.

[@7king8debs79]

​@KalebsRevenge DJ does not meet any threshold of journalism. He is an instigator. He creates the interactions and it is the same over and over. There is no actual comment and as an active participant, there is no impartiality.

[@johnhawkinshawkins1284]

puerile commentary.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Butt hurt fanboy has emotional breakdown.