Bigfoot Believer Debates World’s Angriest Skeptic

[@dsbmitchell]

Two minutes in and it’s clear that this person isn’t an actual skeptic. They’re barely a cynic. More appropriately, they are more accurately simply a troll.

[@Augie-r9q]

Or perhaps cabin in the woods is strawmanning him

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

@@dsbmitchell Skeptic or cynic, no matter. There's still zero proof.🤷‍♂️

[@dsbmitchell]

@ There is plenty of evidence including oral history, eyewitness testimony, trace evidence, and more. Whether or not mainstream academia is willing to accept or examine that evidence is another matter.

[@kberken]

@@christopherwalkinalloverya5824 What exactly would it take for you to believe that they are real?

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

@kberken Any biological proof would do.

[@darylkoestel6921]

I don't believe in bigfoot either, but dismissing testimony from people is a ridiculous argument to say they aren't real. There are people serving time in jail based on "testimony" from people.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Excellent point!

[@hanburgundy4317]

As someone who didn't used to "believe in Bigfoot", I can guarantee you they're very real. I used to mock the entire idea, and anyone who "believed in it", which is the average go-to response to something that seems so absurd. But after seeing a few, finding tracks, hearing vocalizations, and returning to trails I had made to find them marked with stones, it's impossible now for me to think otherwise; they're out there. I don't think they're animals, though; not in the, "deer, rabbit, squirrel, coyote," sense of the word. They seem to be a people, and they're very aware and highly curious, but if they know you've seen them or you frequent an area they've claimed, they get very territorial - might even follow you home. I don't spend anywhere near the amount of time in the forest as I used to - the woods around here have gotten smaller and smaller over time with housing developments, and I've moved to the city and work too often - and as a result I haven't had an encounter in a decade. But I'm sure they're still around. I wouldn't worry too much about them; if you leave them alone, odds are they'll do the same. It's the dogmen that I'd worry about; those, I have no idea if they exist or not, but too many people around here have ran into them for it all to be nothing.

[@Augie-r9q]

Do some research. Eye witness testimony is some of the most unreliable forms of "evidence" But it still amazes me that a 60 year old piece of film and eye witness testimony is still what bf believers have to go on for the most part.

[@jeremiah6462]

​@@Augie-r9q Hundreds of foot prints Audio recordings that cannot be linked to any known species Wood knocking and other auditory clues And the fact that you so easily dismiss the PG film. That film has been analyzed, so much that many scientists have not been able to

[@danschneider7531]

Which is why most courts give little credence to eyewitnes accts. The skeptic guy is an ass, but stripped of all the mockery, he is still correct, more so than the OP. Look at the original PG film vs the blown up and AI altered new versions. You simply cannot blow up a film image and GAIN more info. Go watch the Antonioni film Blowup. AI altered film is also worthless. Decades of folks pointing out that the feet were bootlike, that the glutes did not move and there was no asscrack, and them AI comes and suddenly we see that, and toes and a face. The PG film in the original, is easily seen as a suit, but w all the AI and tweaks it is now worthless as evidence. If the Zaprude rfilm were as altered as the PG film we'd be seeing UFOs taking shots at JFK!

[@chrisd2051]

Based on this guys argument the gorilla didn't exist until 1902.

[@THEEGOBLINNE]

The forefathers of all of todays gorillas spontaneously materialized at exactly midnight, January 1st 1902.

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

How come "Bigfoot tracks" didn't exist until 1958 when Ray L Wallace began hoaxing tracks in Humboldt County as a prank to fool his logging crew? This is a huge red flag..

[@misguidedangel6550]

Different times and much less people

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

@@chrisd2051 Gorillas are not 9 ft tall and 1,000 lbs. Fakefoot supposedly is. In today's day and age with our dwindling forests and advanced surveillance capabilities, it should be very easy to find Fakefoot

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

@@chrisd2051 Gorillas are not 9 ft tall and 1,000 lbs like "Bigfoot". It should be very easy to find such a large animal with today's surveillance capabilities in our dwindling forests.👍🏼

[@AFloridaSon]

Bigfoot and religion make non-believers angry. If you say you believe in the Loch Ness Monster, they may laugh at you. Say you believe in Bigfoot, and they verbally attack you. I find that odd.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Odd indeed. Perhaps the prospect of a massive shift in worldview is frightening to them, and fear often breeds anger.

[@xfilesseasonteneponeandsix8346]

When it comes to the Bible it says why people reject Jesus. Because he shines a light so bright he exposes all the dirt inside us. Even thought the true gospel is salvation by grace and faith alone and eternal security. Sealed forever once saved they will want nothing to do with Jesus. They don't want to want to let go of what they want

[@xfilesseasonteneponeandsix8346]

Though*

[@dannyhernandez265]

@@xfilesseasonteneponeandsix8346I don’t believe in that respectfully.

[@Beforezzz]

Because the thought of these things being out and about frightens them more.

[@THEEGOBLINNE]

Lets be real guys, is a really big ape on two legs all that harder to grasp than a spotted horse with horns and a 10 foot neck, a beetle that basically breathes fire from its ass, or whatever the hell an elephant is? I mean, the existance of *humans* is arguably more baffling of a concept than bigfoot/sasquatch.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Good way of putting it! 🙂

[@Augie-r9q]

But we have tangible evidence for humans which we don't have for bf

[@Beforezzz]

The problem with Bigfoot is that much like spirits, cryptids, and ufos, it always leaves an endless trail of breadcrumbs to any undoubtful evidence of its existence. Gorillas and elephants are conventional animals who don't do that, which is why I suspect these things to be supernatural considering their size, where they've been sighted, this uncanny success rate of avoiding capture, and all the others things that have been reported in witness testimonies.

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

​@@Augie-r9qwe might- bf could be a large version of hominid already discovered.

[@Beforezzz]

Assuming Bigfoot is a very real thing, we don't know if it's simply another conventional creature that you can just go out and make a Nat Geo documentary out of. For its size, the places it's allegedly been sighted, and uncanny success rate of leaving no definitive proof of its existence points to it potentially being something unnatural. Elephants, giraffes, gorillas, insects, and humans all leave traces of themselves that you can track with a variety of results. This is never the case with cryptids, and people should really start asking themselves why that is.

[@climb37775]

I’m fully opened minded after hearing from fellow co-workers regarding finding footprints in the middle of nowhere. I worked for State wildlife agencies early in my career.

[@cabininthewoods517]

I applaud your open-mindedness! 🙂

[@doctoruttley]

Physician and retired coroner here, and I saw one when I was a teen. Something one never forgets. Never go into to woods without a rifle and a friend with a rifle.

[@genogallaher837]

I myself, a life long woodsman, have never seen one but several years ago an unseen presence, terrified me in the woods AND I was armed and sober,, of sound mind .. There ARE things SEEN AND UNSEEN ..

[@luckyjeniusjm]

Well done brother! Your calm logic alone is a win.

[@fredinalaska]

Debate for what? Understand that all the indigenous tribes around the world have oral tradition of their presence, I personally know as a Curyung Tribal Council member that our oral history is based on reality and it's the reason why we are still here ,there's no wasted words or bedtime stories our oral history is passed on by our elders relaying to us the dangers of our environment and the best hunting, fishing and winter or summer camps, we do not entertain fiction it's not our way, so when someone assumes our oral tradition is folklore or mythology they are actually dismissing the reality of our day to day lives and heritage, I personally take it as a personal insult to me and my elders and I will defend our honor to the death any time and place, I love and honor my heritage by passing along the exact same stories shared with me and modern examples of the reality of our world and the evidence is everywhere and yeah there's a ton of hoax bs however I don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, I know they exist because my eyes work lol

[@dwoncrawford5823]

That’s because a small group of people have been allowed to make the world’s narrative as if they have empirical evidence on everything. These people didn’t believe in the mountain gorilla until THEY verified it. Why are we letting them control things?

[@GhettoDetective]

Having the Christ is King mentality and believing in Native American Bigfoot stories doesn't go hand in hand.

[@danschneider7531]

All tribes- indigenous or not, also have wee folk like leprechauns and brownies. Even pygmies have tales of smaller folks, and NONE of them actually exist. Know what exists? Bad eyewitnesses and imagination.

[@danschneider7531]

Human tribes all have tales of wee folk yet leprechauns elude us as well.

[@dsbmitchell]

@@fredinalaska Thank you, Fred, for all that you have done and continue to do to support your community. Your channel is one of the best out there on the subject, and the work that you are doing will surely continue to resonate beyond your years. I am an African-American male and an assistant professor of psychology who has begun to dig professional into my lifelong intuitive understanding of these beings and other entities around the world. I truly appreciate the work that you and others like you have done. Know that I am doing my part to hold up the work that you and others like you have been doing through my own writing. May you continue to find solace and strength in community near and far. 👏🏾💪🏾🙌🏾

[@SweetHomeOregonSasquatch]

Fantastic points. I think you had an encounter with a typical troll. He had nothing intelligent to say and a lot of anger, as you said. His credibility on the subject is 0. He's never been on a research project. He's given no proof of false allegations. I would love to hear him debate Jeff Meldrum. 😉 Great video!

[@cabininthewoods517]

Thanks for the encouragement and for watching. 🙂

[@kberken]

You must enjoy arguing with trolls. I've learned that some people just go online to act like trolls. They don't necessarily believe what they're writing. They just get a kick out of trolling. It's a verbal staring contest! Glad you enjoyed it.

[@gregolson5532]

There is also people paid by Governments to do things to discredit/demoralize certain subjects.

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

@@gregolson5532 There are also gullible rubes who believe in such fantasy monsters as "Bigfoot".

[@LarryFleetwood8675]

@@gregolson5532 Yep, most Bigfoot trolls are just that.

[@thecontractor365]

Would love to hear a part 2 where you discuss the Patterson Gimlin Bluff Creek encounter of 1967.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Noted! 🙂

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

The PG film is a dead topic. It has been beaten to death. The face looks very fake when it faces the camera. As if a large cut out is over the area where the eyes should be. Possibly a hole to ventilate for an alleged man in a costume. It doesn't appear to be a real creature. Zero female hominids or primates exhibit a fully hair-covered face or hairy mammaries. I think there's a reason why only 13% of Americans believe in Bigfoot..

[@GhettoDetective]

@@cabininthewoods517 If the Patterson/Gimlin video turn out to be fake would you then stop believing in Bigfoot ?

[@windowmon6273]

I would like to see more of this debate, it made me laugh. I love the way you presented your aggressor with that angry picture and humdrum scowling angry voice. 🤣

[@cabininthewoods517]

Noted! Thanks for the encouragement. 🙂 As for the voice, that’s exactly how he sounded in my head haha.

[@ObsidianFane]

Yah it definitely was a straw man attempt to characterize him as a grumpy curmudgeon

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

They really sound like that. Same exact words too.

[@JoeBolders]

I believe the Patterson and the freeman footage are real.

[@cabininthewoods517]

I agree with you.

[@dannyhernandez265]

I think it’s fake. The reason why being… how come we haven’t seen another footage of one? Why just the 67 footage? It’s been a long time, and I find it hard to believe that no one has gotten footage of once since then.

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

There's been lots of other decent footage, but Patterson was lucky and caught the whole body in daylight. A suit in daylight would be exposed immediately.

[@JoeBolders]

@@dannyhernandez265 Maybe patty was the last of her kind? maybe they died off, maybe they moved further into the wilderness? No one knows, But I have watched the Patterson footage for decades and there is just no way it can be faked, look at MK Davis on here and his break down of the film. Its 1967, it couldn't be done by 2 broke cowboys and no one has been able to recreate it?

[@LastSunrise1981]

@@dannyhernandez265 Hard to capture decent footage when encounters only last for a few seconds. Also, remember there's uncertainty and fear with filming an unknown creature.

[@NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow]

The great Panda was considered a myth and no scientists believed the stories. But it was at the time very difficult to track and find. Yet a woman went in and managed to track it and brought one back.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Absolutely correct. 🙂

[@Augie-r9q]

Right but we haven't caught a bigfoot yet have we? And until that happens I will remain a sceptic and so should you. Same thing with the gorilla. In the 1860 when Europeans first started exploring the west coast of Africa they heard stories gorillas resembling humans living in the woods and they dismissed these stories until one was captured. And yet with bigfoot believers the Patterson film is still the main piece of evidence that they hang their hats on and it's almost 60 years old now. During all this time technology has improved many many times over. We haven't found any hair samples or fecal matter to date. This is not very impressive.

[@theprophet9429]

Everything is considered myth when cameras are scarce, video hasn’t been invented and travel was difficult. You realise 2024 is different to the mid 1800’s, yes?

[@GhettoDetective]

@@cabininthewoods517 Excuse me did you delete my question which was for you ??🤨

[@NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow]

@theprophet9429 hmm, oh yes, didn't notice...

[@BMO_Creative]

Sasquatch tribes don't just exist, they thrive!!

[@ricknovak5308]

BMO! Yeah man! BMO is a great artist and has drawn a bunch of them based on descriptions on his channel.

[@BMO_Creative]

@@ricknovak5308 Oh Hey! Thanks!

[@NikkiColon]

Not possible that they are thriving IMO. If they were then we would have definitive Scientific proof and their bones would be in a museum somewhere, like ours.

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

I highly doubt that. Go look up other Native folklore "creatures" such as "The Thunderbird". A giant raptor that shoots lightning bolts from it's eyes and creates thunder claps with each stroke of it's wings. Sorry, but I'm not buying it...

[@BMO_Creative]

@@christopherwalkinalloverya5824 I did a video about the Thunderbird and some creatures from the past that fit the descriptions from some of the native stories... and drew the Quetzalcoatlus because it was definitely one of them.

[@allenrusselljr]

Read up on Dr Ketchums DNA study and how she was well respected (used by courts and the FBI) then became blackballed after the study. There's been other DNA studies as well that have confirmed her findings. I've learned everyone is a skeptic until they have an experience.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Thanks for the insightful comment! I’m a big fan of fan of Dr. Ketchum’s work, and even had the privilege of speaking with her personally. 🙂

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

Admittedly, her data and conclusions seem suspect.

[@dsbmitchell]

@@cabininthewoods517 Awesome! How long ago did you speak with her? I haven’t heard anything about the new study she’s supposed to be doing in quite some time.

[@outlandharry]

I recently had a potential sighting. After hearing an ear piercing scream which sounded like a woman I shortly after caught some eyes on camera not high but around 5'. My buddy who has seen one thinks it was a juvenile. When I posted the video it got a lot of mixed comments about 50% thought It was, and the other half said cougar. I personally haven't seen one so I cant say I believe but I'm also not denying they could exist. This was in North Vancouver Island as well. After that experience I looked up bigfoot screams and stumbled upon your videos. This video was well put together thanks!

[@cabininthewoods517]

Thank you for sharing your experience, Harry! The details you provided are fascinating, and it’s always intriguing when potential encounters like yours are met with split opinions. Those piercing, woman-like screams are a hallmark in many documented Bigfoot cases and often hard to attribute to known animals like cougars, even though some suggest them as explanations. It’s interesting that your buddy, who has seen one, thought it might be a juvenile-that’s a detail worth exploring further. North Vancouver Island has had its share of unusual activity, so your experience fits well within the patterns seen in other reported encounters. I’m glad you stumbled upon my videos during your research, and thank you for the kind words about the content! Keep an open mind, and if you ever gather more footage or insights, I’d love to hear about them. Every piece of data contributes to understanding these elusive beings.

[@johnmcnulty4425]

I've been an outdoorsman for a large part of life, living in and working in several different forests in the US and several places abroad. I have honestly never seen, heard, smelled or felt anything that suggested of the existence of Bigfoot. Now, based on my own personal experience, I could easily say that this creature doesn't exist, but that doesn't incorporate having an open mind in my world view does it? Just the fact that so many humans from Native Americans and Daniel Boone to present day folks have stories would seem to suggest that something IS out there of a Bigfoot nature. Evidence exists but proof is still forthcoming. Honestly, I wish that it wasn't true as it means that I can never feel quite as at home in the forest as I always have. It hard to believe that the 'boogie man' is actually real until you have your own experience I guess.

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

I hear you. I've spent over 40 years camping, fishing, hiking and exploring remote wilderness and have never seen or heard anything that I would attribute to "Bigfoot". I believe it's just a myth.

[@comicrandomness3289]

I believe in people saying they have seen Bigfoot but i still want proof. I remember seeing a story about a man finding a mythical fish seen over 200 years ago. Imagine that. 200 years ago you see some crazy creatures but people say it's fake and goes down as a myth but it did exist and we didn't get proof until after everyone in that time had died. So i do believe these people but will we find a body in our lifetime?

[@alrivers2297]

What is your opinion on the Patterson bigfoot footage? Does it look like a real creature to you or someone in a cheap gorilla suit? It looks real to me

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

@alrivers2297 Looks very fake and it walks exactly like a human. The face mask in particular is very bad. There's obviously a large ventilation hole where the eyes should be. It just looks artificial all around..

[@missycitty9478]

I am a believer, however, because I've never seen one, I can't say for sure they exist. That is why I'd never argue the case.

[@cabininthewoods517]

That’s fair and perfectly reasonable. 🙂 Prior to seeing one (and possibly more than one) a couple months ago, I felt similarly.

[@missycitty9478]

@cabininthewoods517 😉👍 I love that you saw one!! And envious tbh!

[@Augie-r9q]

If you can't say for they exist then why do believe?

[@missycitty9478]

@Augie-r9q I believe because I choose to believe. I believe because I believe the thousands of testimonials I've read about and listened to since I was a child. Hope that answers your question.

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

@@missycitty9478 I don't believe because the lack of proof and the fact that in over 40 years of spending a lot of time in the wilderness I've never seen or heard anything that could be attributed to "Bigfoot".

[@davidnorwich3771]

11.41 Angry skeptic - "Now go curl up in the feotal position and pout." 😄😄😄😄

[@cabininthewoods517]

That one had me laughing too. 😂

[@principalmcvicker6530]

Just finished watching all your sasquatch videos minutes ago and then see that this was uploaded an hour ago. Great timing! I feel catered to

[@cabininthewoods517]

Glad you’re enjoying! Thanks for your interest and support. 🙂

[@mehGyver]

I'm always amazed at how someone will invest so much energy arguing about something they think doesn't exist. I don't believe in Flat Earth Theory, but I won't waste a minute of my life on their videos arguing with them. But then again, I'm not an emotional adult, seeking attention.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Takes all types to make a world I guess. 🙂

[@comicrandomness3289]

The earth isn't flat but i like to say so. I want to see if people are stupid or not.

[@spiritualarchitect4276]

Yes, this is a big puzzler. While there are people paid by the government/military to convince people that UFO's do not exist, I cannot see that happening for Sasquatch. I think the government just wants the whole idea to go away. I have no idea why deniers would waste any of their time trying to convince believers not to waste their time.

[@jimmy2745]

I've never understood what's so hard to believe about the concept of sasquatch. Additionally, at this point, someone saying there is ZERO evidence of the existence of sasquatch has absolutely ZERO credibility on the subject as far as I'm concerned.

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

The "evidence" is weak. It's the lack of proof that is most concerning. The Earth has been around for 5 billion years and still NO proof of "Bigfoot".

[@Nis3z6r]

I bet you believe in Santa too right 😂

[@jimmy2745]

@@Nis3z6r I feel a little sorry for people like you since you can never learn anything because you already know everything. Good luck with that.

[@dsbmitchell]

@@jimmy2745 this is the way. I’m in full agreement. Anyone saying they don’t exist is either a troll, hasn’t done their homework, or has some emotional block to admitting that there is legitimate evidence out there.

[@ericsteadman7235]

The Brown Thermal from the Florida panhandle is the most convincing footage for me. It's been 12 years thermal cameras are cheap enough now where are all the copies...

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

Like Patterson, brown was out there and lucked out.

[@charlespaxton1927]

Science never dismissed the idea of the giant squid.

[@theprophet9429]

Exactly. I just commented similar. People get confused with the history of the giant squid. We had dead specimens nearly 200 years ago. 🙄

[@danschneider7531]

Because it is very plausible, and there were physical traces. There are none for Bigfoot, yeti, Nessie, Mokele Mbembe, and all these other cryptids, gray aliens, ghosts, Solway Firth Spaceman, zombies, etc.

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

@@charlespaxton1927 Because we've had giant squid washing up on the beach for hundreds of years lol. Not one single Bigfoot ever found...🥱

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

A hundred years, not 1000. Until then, it was a myth that lasted centuries.

[@christopherwalkinalloverya5824]

@@robertcoggeshall3071 Giant squid live miles under the sea. Fakefoot supposedly lives amongst us in the forest. We would have proof by now if it were real. It's time to grow up and leave the fantasy behind...

[@shannonchurchill4556]

It's amazing to me that anyone can so profoundly declare that something does not exist, claiming there is "no evidence on this earth" while ignoring all of the evidence, and dismissing thousands of people's testimony as nothing more than lies, as if there is anything to gain by making such claims, besides possible ridicule. The fact that dozens of native cultures have names for these beings should be enough to make one realize that it's got to be more than coincidence. It's obvious that this critic is little more than a Dunning-Kruger case study.

[@mehGyver]

I'd love to see a part 2. I'm pretty sure that guy was saying the same things about "evidence" in my comments. Totally discounting footprints, sightings, unknown hair and DNA samples, pics, and videos.... saying none of that stuff matters.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Could well have been the same charming gentleman! 🙂

[@pseudonym3690]

What DNA samples are there specifically that point to a completely new unknown humanoid species?

[@jcarry5214]

He sounds really similar to several "guys" I have encountered as well. They never seem to know the difference between testimony and anecdote, or the difference between evidence/proof.

[@johnv9594]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence- Carl Sagan

[@PigeonKicker1234]

There are lots of clips here that I've not seen before. I would love a simple video on a loop of these bigfoot clips. I just think that even if they are blurry and at distance. The act of seeing them all together will show that there is something common to them all and that is that they are the same shape and importantly moving in exactly the same manner as each other. That's the thing I notice that the convincing ones all have the same smooth movement as each other.

[@renekuskchristensen2182]

You make good arguments to support your case in this vid... Well done😊👍😉

[@cabininthewoods517]

Well thank you. The main thing is to stay calm. 🙂

[@boomerang379]

I feel like people of his particular description and demeanor should be hauled out to East Texas or perhaps the northern Sierras, Cascades or Sawtooth wilderness areas and taken on a Bigfoot tour. I don’t think he’d maintain his angry skepticism for very long.

[@5150hammerhead]

I'm a skeptic. I would need more concrete proof, something more physical for me. But I still can't claim to know for sure.

[@cabininthewoods517]

That’s what I’d call healthy skepticism. Quite a different sort than the gentleman in my video. Thanks for the comment! 🙂

[@northmanskeep5996]

At least three of those videos were from Michigan, I swear they are all over. Great video with sharp points good job

[@LemonsCure]

Fun fact: The Dinosaur skeletons that you see in the museums aren't even real bones, but mere recreations. Great video, btw

[@pseudonym3690]

Source?

[@bradhurd6097]

I think they are recreations of real existing fossilized bones. I imagine the bones are too fractured and heavy for display purposes, which makes me wonder if the scientists have the bones in the correct shape, or even the correct location.

[@pseudonym3690]

@@bradhurd6097 Those bones aren't brittle. They're fossilized, so they're basically stone, hence why they survived millions of years. It seems that some US museums actually put out replicas for some skeletons, but that's certainly not enough to claim that all of them do it, Apparently, there are signs explaining whether those skeletons are real or not.

[@paulineplittlelady]

I believe some of the bones are actual fossils. Then they build the rest of the dinosaur around those found, based on assumptions made over time of study. Ultimately no one really knows what they looked like.

[@holzapfelstein]

@@bradhurd6097 - This reminds me of how the Museum of Natural History in NYC had their T-Rex skeleton standing upright for decades, but now the bulk of its bones are horizontal to the ground (as scientists now believe this is how they walked most of the time, while standing perfectly upright was something they'd only do occasionally to get a better look over trees & such). When I was a kid I saw the T-Rex standing tall, but the last time I saw it (as an adult), it was positioned horizontally.

[@AgentStargrave]

You can ask someone to think outside the box, but first they need to understand that the box is there.

[@dsbmitchell]

@@AgentStargrave 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾 well said

[@g-man4297]

I don't know for sure if Sasquatch/bigfoot's exist there are some compelling pictures and video's but for each one that looks real there are a dozen or more that don't, the hoaxers certainly don't help to change the sceptics opinions, personally I am open minded about it and find it a very interesting topic, have watched a ton of video's, hopefully one day it will be proven one way or the other conclusively, cheers from Scotland.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Thanks for the thoughtful comment! I appreciate your open-mindedness. 🙂

[@WisGuy4]

I was disappointed to see that you included as background to the video a segment of last years Colorado train footage, showing a hoaxer in a suit in a hillside along the train tracks. When the point of the video is to say that Sasquatch is real and reports of Sasquatch sightings are credible, it weakens your video to include a fairly well-known hoaxed video.

[@NikkiColon]

There were many proven hoaxed videos used. And I have to agree, it took the steam out of the main point. But I understand his points.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Sorry to disappoint you!

[@RandomRants525]

I was disappointed I watched this.

[@rossdawgsbrokenspirit9038]

was that one proven as a hoax?

[@j.d.leslie8458]

Can you post a link to this hoax being exposed?

[@NikkiColon]

You make some good arguments, but then you used multiple hoaxed videos to produce this video. Whether someone believes Patty or not, we are in the same position over 50 years now.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Thank you for your comment, Nikki. I appreciate your thoughtful input. While I understand the frustration with hoaxed videos muddying the waters of Bigfoot research, I want to clarify that the inclusion of such videos in the production wasn’t meant to endorse them as definitive proof, but rather to examine and discuss their impact on the broader topic. Regarding being in the same position for over 50 years, I’d argue that while we haven’t achieved definitive proof, the accumulation of consistent patterns-such as track morphology, eyewitness testimonies, and audio recordings-adds to the intrigue and warrants further investigation. The existence of hoaxes doesn’t negate the possibility of authentic encounters, much like how counterfeit money doesn’t invalidate the existence of real currency. The debate around Bigfoot thrives on critical thinking and open dialogue like yours, so thank you for sharing your perspective!

[@dannyhernandez265]

@@cabininthewoods517why in this modern day, where we have drones and improved technology, we still cannot find any evidence of them??

[@jcarry5214]

@@dannyhernandez265 I'm deaf as s--t and even I can hear a drone way far off in the woods. Having better tech doesn't mean it's being directed appropriately, either. People are not good at using it for some reason, and I bet some people that are successful just do not share what they get, which I can sympathize with. I think another big part of this is that people (like me) who could help with increasing the odds for people with those resources aren't being asked or will not share. I have made observations about behavior in a location over multiple years but In this specific case I think they should be left alone (if I'm right.) On top of that tech requires manpower, and even mundane creatures are exponentially sensitive to the increase of humans in a wilderness area. So to make tech effective you'd need an overwhelming draw that keeps the animals in the area, like an extremely habituated human outpost located near an important seasonal food resource. You're asking good questions, I hope this comes across as helpful and respectful.

[@jcarry5214]

Nikki I had the same beef, but i think I understand and am ok with using it as visual narrative. There are some that I'm less ok with because they've been resurrected so many times like the swamp ape tree stump one. But overall I'm welcoming this guy's work.

[@NikkiColon]

@@cabininthewoods517 Good answer thanks. Also, I'm a believer in bigfoot, wholeheartedly, but I am a true skeptic of the evidence. I base my show on the facts and talk about the stuff most in the community don't like to talk about. Thanks for your time.

[@adamk.mademewatchthis8622]

Bigfoot Skeptics are embarrassing at a certain point… the mid tarsal break proves everything..

[@cabininthewoods517]

The mid-tarsal break is certainly highly suggestive! 🙂

[@drop830]

I make this argument all the time, and i think its extremely valid when it comes to the Sasquatch topic. Look at the case of "Hiroo Onoda", He was the Japanese officer who hid out on a Filipino island for all most 30 years. He went un contact for decades, because he thought the war was still going on. Sure people had sightings of Onoda on the island, and many search parties went out looking for him over the long years, but ultimately he didnt want to be found, so no one could find him. Compare that to a Sasquatch. An animal that some believe has intellect of maybe an early human. Couldnt something like that stay hidden in Americas deep forests and swamps, hiding in the darkest couners of the world. Sasquatch stomping grounds are far bigger than some Filipino island.

[@cabininthewoods517]

That’s a fascinating parallel-thanks very much for sharing!

[@stangrunewald9374]

INSECURITY is what drives folks like that! They want to be in control of EVERYTHING and truly believe they are! THEY SAY THE BELIEVE IN GOG, but GOD always has to be on their terms! They're just closed off and unwilling to accept the agnostic and acknowledge the worlds keeps turning EITHER WITH OR WITHOUT their hard heads! GREAT PIECE MAN! I know what I saw down by Deep Fork River 20 years ago! When the owner of a business nearby called me at work to verify he and a deputy sheriff had seen the same thing, I was so thankful to NOT HAVE lying eyes because I'd never seen something so black and scary looking! Top of it's head come to the bottom of the eve of a nearby double wide almost and it shook my ass up! Stan the Jokeman Henryetta OK

[@LanceTerry-k6p]

The Gold Standard of Bigfoot footage.

[@cabininthewoods517]

What is?

[@Cobalt_Dragon0716]

​@@cabininthewoods517The Patterson-Gimlin film.

[@afterburner2869]

Does anyone else find it very strange that every video of what is supposed to be a Bigfoot here is blurry and out of focus? It’s always blurry, out of focus, unstable footage, very far away, or just very questionable in its nature. With all these modern video cameras available to everyone and yet they are always blurry and out of focus. It’s like we have become used to the poor quality of these types of videos and nobody even questions why.

[@biginrome8070]

The modern-day phone cameras aren't 4K quality to my knowledge and plus if you see Bigfoot are you really going to try to get close enough to get a better video?

[@afterburner2869]

@@biginrome8070. KZbin is literally jammed packed full of videos taken by cellphones of animals from bears to birds to seals and everything in between all perfectly clear. The excuse that cellphones are not capable of producing clear videos is false. If a Bigfoot were a real creature, there would be plenty of clear videos of the creature but there are none. If I were in the position to capture a Bigfoot on video, I would definitely try and get closer to get the best video footage possible. I wish they did exist but the lack of absolute impeachable evidence is not a good sign that they do exist.

[@adamb.c.1553]

This skeptic must HATE, inter alia, the Jurassic Park movies. They completely guessed, other than bone structure, what those dinosaurs actually looked like. And they even changed the size of some dinosaurs for cinematic effect. The skeptic guy probably walks around museums mumbling curses like Yosemite Sam.

[@shroomssadow4981]

“Ain’t no such thing as a black and white bear bro, just your imagination” 😂😂

[@kazkazimierz1742]

Given the physical evidence and the sightings by credible people, I think they are real creatures.

[@cabininthewoods517]

I agree!

[@Augie-r9q]

Then why hasn't the scientific community find any of this evidence sufficient. They don't.

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

​@@Augie-r9qtoo mind blowing.

[@carolbeck3645]

I don't believe, I KNOW they exist !!! And the DNA that has been collected is EXACTLY 💯 what I knew it would be !!! Things happened to2 of my family when I was little, and Things have been happening to my husband in just the last few weeks that had him extremely shook up !!!

[@dsbmitchell]

@@carolbeck3645 Oh, what has been happening with your husband? It’s good that he has you to talk to you about his experiences

[@jephfandingo1438]

Thank you for doing this video, in addition to strengthening the case for bigfoots existence, you've really helped me to improve my debate tactics in an open minded search for universal knowledge and facts not based solely on emotional self righteousness. Well done 🙂🙂

[@timtwing5886]

The moon is an extraterrestrial spacecraft that the ETs use as a means of watching us here on earth but programmed us to look at it as nothing more than a source of light that has mostly "always been there"!

[@mariongrable3834]

The one thing I find really annoying, is there are people that absolutely will not say it’s possible. And on the other hand some people will tell you what you think doesn’t matter, they are experts. And claiming to be an expert, on something that isn’t recognized to exist, is odd. This should blow this guys mind, make him real angry. There is more than one in that video. More like 3 to 4. You need to check out MK Davis, and bigfoot central. They’re real, they have been around a long, long time. And there is a lot of evidence. Footprints, hair, very few real videos, photos, and fecal matter. And check out the close up face image of patty it’s crazy. Thanx for the video. And believing what you want to believe. Looking forward to your next video.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Thank you for such a supportive comment! I completely agree-it’s baffling how some people outright dismiss all possibilities while claiming expertise on something they don't even acknowledge exists. The evidence, as you mentioned, is compelling-footprints, hair samples, and even the rare videos like Patty are truly fascinating. I’ll definitely revisit MK Davis’ work and dig more into the details you suggested, like the close-up of Patty's face. It’s always great to hear from someone who’s equally passionate about exploring the evidence. Thank you for watching, and I appreciate your kind words about the video-stay tuned for more!

[@baalbezub6848]

One thing I have a hard time grasping, pertaining to the P-G Film, is the non-chalant way it just walks away. You would think a creature that is supposed to be so elusive would either scurry away quickly, or better yet, not come around in daylight at all.

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

Patterson got lucky and caught a female out in the open before she got to cover.

[@dsbmitchell]

@@baalbezub6848 I have heard this argument elsewhere and would simply say two things: a) if these beings are quite comfortable in their environments and are essentially at the top of the food chain, then the perceived non-chalantness makes sense in that she has nothing to really worry about, and b) even if the her behavior is hard to understand, that alone is not enough to entirely dismiss the film.

[@joycerabbitt4362]

Great videos! First time watcher and enjoy your calm voice with decent content. Thank you for including us.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Thanks for the kind words and for watching! 🙂

[@johnneiberger]

Is it just me or is the brightness on this video cranked up to 10000? Other videos looks normal, but parts of this one look like my screen brightness is turned up to MAX.

[@allankang7374]

Skeptics and believers are the same, just on opposite sides of the same coin. Both operate on blind devotion of belief to each their own brand of cult. Then there are those who've actually seen the beings, those are knowers. They are NOT believers and simply accept the reality of what they've seen as a natural part of this world, like the birds in the sky, fish in the stream. Even though I've never seen a sasquatch, myself, I'd rather be considered as one who accepts the reality of sasquatch existence, rather than the "Belief" of their existence. I accept they are real and let them be, no need to prove to skeptics or anyone else on earth that they're real. That's just me.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Fair enough. I’m inclined to agree. I myself am a knower, but “Bigfoot Believer” is more relatable as a video title in my opinion.

[@Augie-r9q]

Sorry but sceptics will be willing to change their minds when presented with sufficient evidence. In this case of bf sufficient evidence would be to have an actual body where DNA samples can be taken. Anything short of that is insuffient. A cynict is one with blind devotion

[@frontsidegrinder6858]

Exactly my thoughts. It's just the way it is naturally.

[@danschneider7531]

They are NOT believers and simply accept the reality of what they've seen as a natural part of this world,- another way of calling them psychotics.

[@RandomRants525]

Strailian YOWIE here. Dude. I can't believe you wasted 3 days talking in circles like this. I can't believe I just listened to you both say the same thing differently over and over for 13min35secs. No winners, we have all lost something after this. And you humans wonder why we're elusive. We want no part of what humans have got goin on.

[@alevieirareis]

What is your take on the hypothesis of BF as an Interdimensional creature?

[@cabininthewoods517]

Haven’t looked into it deeply enough to have a fully-formed opinion just yet. Currently researching.

[@davidnorwich3771]

@@cabininthewoods517 I suspect that while that would be interesting, the reality of going down that road would forever alienate bigfoot research further from the scientific community. However after seeing that predator pixelation cloaker video that Barb Shupe took, it does make you wonder.

[@TheNortheastAl]

@@davidnorwich3771Freaky stuff.

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

Patty forgot to portal, lol.

[@Beforezzz]

Makes alot more sense tbh. I went into more detail explaining why this could be beyond the basic conventional theory in one reply but my comment kept getting deleted, yet all my other comments are fine... Ok.

[@thatsnotoneofmeatsmanyuses1970]

Astronomer Halton Arp cataloged hundreds of examples of astronomical objects with apparent physical connections to other objects despite large redshift differences between them (which would indicate enormous distances). His work wasn't easily refuted, so the next best solution was to deny him the telescope time to make more of these inconvenient observations.

[@markanderson5226]

300,000 trail cams in the North American woods. We would have one by now if they were there.

[@steveakka]

Part 2 please...subscribed 👍

[@cabininthewoods517]

Thanks for the support!

[@allenforbus9020]

To those who think there is no evidence of the existence of the subject, either you have not seen or know of all the evidence or you are ignoring all of the evidence. Even if you read only 100 or more encounter reports you start to see correlations in context of these reports, as in while driving, camping, fishing, hiking, swimming, hunting etc. this includes many other things even at home, work or play! Time of day, night, time of year, season, spring summer, fall or winter, type of weather etc. Of course type of context you are engaged in as there are many types even taking the trash out! So after only 100 or so reports read you will start seeing correlations & the more reports you read the more correlations you will find, now your learning Sasquatch behavior patterns no doubt you’ll agree. When thinking of Sasquatch one must think outside the box for the creature has many abilities that we don’t understand & when we don’t understand something we think it’s fake! Then we make fun of others for jokes & laughs! Very immature & childish no doubt! When you see one it changes your life, when you’ve seen more than three it f@¥ks up your life. Not really but you’re always thinking what else was I told growing up is fake but very real!

[@eliletts8149]

The way you presented your argument was far more eloquently done than the skeptic, hahaha! Also, based on some of the comments I have read in this comment section, I guess some people with still side with the skeptic for reasons...

[@cabininthewoods517]

Thanks for the kind words! Yes, there are definitely more than a few “Harolds” in the comments section. 😂

[@PrinzessinSchuhkarton]

are sceptics in reality scared of that they might face a change of their beliefs and knowledge?

[@gallery7596]

Well, as a once firm believer who is now more of an agnostic regarding the whole question, I think this skeptical guy is just intolerant and downright rude, and that kind of behaviour is totally uncalled for. As for me, I'm not holding my breath that these creatures are gonna be proven to exist in my lifetime, but I'd sure love to see it happen.

[@cabininthewoods517]

As a guy whose real passion is for boot-on-the-ground research into these beings, I’ll do my best to make it happen for you. 🙂

[@JasonHollis-hg6vg]

That's a point! What happens when one of them dies? Do they bury there dad? How come we've never seen a random dead body of a Bigfoot

[@jjasper7512]

Once all the trees are chopped down we'll know for sure! I'd prefer infrared,lidar drones over sighting areas. Hope it's not captured and put in a lab though

[@doctoruttley]

Trust the science! Remember how that turned out? 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@TheFiestyhick]

Nicely done Canadian chap😊

[@rickitickidicki]

@9:50 Apology accepted for Dr. Melba K. Big of you to admit it, Bro.

[@biginrome8070]

Let me put this into perspective for you the gorilla wasn't recognized by science as being real until 1847 when the American missionary and naturalist Thomas S. Savage, along with the anatomist Jeffries Wyman, described the species based on skulls and bones collected in Gabon, West Africa. They published their findings in the "Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History," naming the species Troglodytes gorilla, which is now known as the western gorilla.

[@Xsheaffer]

Skepticism and intellectual laziness are very difficult to differentiate.

[@longway2pro]

Lol the "something that isn't proven doesn't exist" is crazy. By that logic, a tree doesn't make a sound if no one is there to hear it

[@bc4198]

The debater was, in fact, a sasquatch who is catfishing you, to try and convince people to leave them alone.

[@waynedavis7245]

One thing that I notice is people will see a video and if the video is not the best quality, shaking or a little blurry they say it's fake. The same person will see a clear video and say it's too good and call it fake. The funny thing is that in a court of law video is enough to send you too prison. I know if big foot is real or not and I don't really care . But people are definitely seeing something. But I don't know what it is?

[@andrewhaddow7843]

Bruh every time you play the PGF it's an upscaled version. Play the og footage.

[@kaalen24]

Right from the beginning your argument for bigfoots possible existence is flawed. You said: “Absence of evidence isn’t evidence against bigfoots existence”. However, absence of evidence is a form of evidence. If you go into a cave looking for a bear and you find no evidence of bear activity, wouldn’t you say with a high degree of certainty that a bear isn’t living in this particular cave? Why would you say that? Because, we know bears are large animals. They leave unmistakable evidence of their existence. Lack of evidence is indeed evidence of something. It’s something you have to consider when making your calculations. A large hairy animal such as the ones reported must leave evidence of their existence or else something fishy is going on.

[@cabininthewoods517]

Your argument conflates the absence of evidence with evidence of absence. The analogy of bears in a cave doesn’t fully apply to Bigfoot research due to the vastly different circumstances. Bears are a well-documented species with known habits, diets, and habitats, making it easier to identify their presence. In contrast, Sasquatch are reported as elusive creatures possibly possessing heightened intelligence, nocturnal tendencies, and an ability to avoid detection. Additionally, the wilderness is immense, with millions of acres unexplored or lightly surveyed. Skeptics often overlook evidence such as footprints with dermal ridges, recorded vocalizations, and consistent eyewitness accounts that align across decades and cultures. If evidence of Sasquatch were as overt as bear scat in a cave, we wouldn’t still be debating their existence, but the subtlety and rarity of their traces suggest an entirely different behavioral pattern. Something “fishy” is going on-and that is a failure to acknowledge the uniqueness of the subject in question.

[@kaalen24]

@ You are talking about a large land mammal that has been reported to be hundreds of lbs in weight and upwards of 7 ft tall or greater. We aren’t talking about an ocean species where habitat is most unreachable for humans. These reports are coming from our backyards as it were. Stretches of woods regularly hunted, camped or at the very least explored by humans. The lack of physical evidence is disturbing to me. I fully acknowledge that it’s possible that a species exists in a small capacity most likely which would somewhat explain the lack of physical evidence. I don’t believe that is happening but I wouldn’t go so far as to rule it out. The lack of physical evidence on land is problematic for me. We haven’t found one fossil of a large primate that dates closer to modern times yet.

[@newcountryguy]

The funny part is the skeptics get mad because you don't think the way they do. Like it has an effect on their world what you believe or don't. Smh

[@cabininthewoods517]

Some do, certainly.

[@richardfireone]

the whole perceived reality is a hologram of illustrated information that the human mind labels "form" and information can change perception revealing deeper self created illusions based on an evolving definition process. No worse a blind person than the one who doesnt want to see

[@rogerthomas738]

Im waiting on more blurry pictures that seems they ever get.

[@mikefetterman6782]

My old boss is the same. He heard about Ray Wallace's kids announcing he faked some prints in CA in the 50s. That was enough for him to conclude that it is all hoaxes. Being highly biologically strict, as I am too, he doesn't see the arguments. Some people are very skeptical and to the point of not investigating. My boss and I now no longer speak, he has no time for this kind of talk.

[@mikefetterman6782]

I do agree, however, that sightings and testimony are the WORST forms of evidence. They may be true, but without documentation, they are just anecdotal, not physical. I have enough physical evidence displayed to me to know they are a real, earth bound, natural species (being that NO supernatural anything, has ever been shown to exist). Multi dimensional beings is not something we have anything but stories about. I have to discount those until SOME inter-dimensional evidence proves there are more than the 4 dimensions we live in.

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

Yes, the media is at fault for buying the phony confessions.

[@DRAKED411]

Thank you brother, great content someone who doesn’t want to believe in evidence you will never change their mind or they’re saying that there is no evidence? I don’t know what to say for him. The skeptic that is.

[@moejoehvl]

I don't think part two really is necessary; obviously, that was a very angry person, and you will never be able to reason with that kind of mindset. Let him go on Fiesta in his own world and you Just keep enjoying chasing big footies

[@davidcopson5800]

Another good video. Mr Skeptic was quite irrational. In a court of law, eye witness testimony is instrumental in convicting criminals. Part 2 would be good.

[@cabininthewoods517]

He was indeed. And thank you!

[@jimdreyer1]

I try to keep an open mind but the lack of a carcass or bones is troubling. How can an 8-10 foot mammal - that's purported to be seen all over the place - stay completely hidden in this day and age? Some propose that they bury their dead, but that would necessitate them living in groups, which would make them even easier to find. Yet, we find nothing... I'm not ready to dismiss what seem like very credible eyewitness reports (the stories on sub arctic sasquatch channel are scary as hell) but the lack of hard evidence weighs heavily in favor of myth.

[@robertcoggeshall3071]

Gigantopithecus still has not 1 bone of the body ever found. Only teeth and jaws.

[@Goesinya69]

All the tech now, especially with millions of cellular trail cameras out in the woods now?

[@cliftonjarvis8010]

That’s Tim Waltz in a suite😮

[@vasiovasio]

So, Objective and Logical video! The Only thing that I can tell you - Thank God your channel is related to Bigfoot and Not Aliens and UFOs, because Then you See what we call BACKLASH!!! 😂😂😂 Off-topic - what is the name/brand/model/type of your hat, and what keywords to use to find it? In my country, Bulgaria, practically Nobody wears this type of hat and we know it only from Indiana Jones movies or so! In the Canadian wilderness, it seems like an Amazing choice! ☺☺☺

[@cabininthewoods517]

Thanks for the comment and for watching! Agreed-you’d need a very thick skin to tackle aliens! My hat is made by a company called Rogue. www.rogueoriginal.com/products/rogue-original-hat?srsltid=AfmBOoqNLR7f_E_RUigtfqE4n7B3PqDxKdz2tRsJcntDdY1scuPc_dD3

[@JohnSewart]

Part II, please.

[@jamesaskew3493]

Boy,that guy needs a snickers candy bar! Maybe switch to de-caf ! I don’t know if they are real but, it’s plausible and hard to ignore so many reports! Its also fun to think Bigfoot is real!

[@pamelah6431]

Wait. The Easter bunny isn't real?!?!?!

[@pilbomags488]

My favorite part is the angry voice.

[@GibbonLord]

If someone would've said bigfoot lives in Thailand than I'd be interested but everywhere in the world would be very unlikely. And what would be more weird is that small primates havent naturally migrated to north America but a giant ape managed to do so. If bigfoot is thought as an alien or spirit I wouldn't claim it doesn't exist because than i would have no way of logically claiming its not real. But if its a real animal we need dna that closely resembles orang utan.

[@dannybright8708]

I’m just speculating here, but I think if Bigfoot actually is real its elusiveness is likely due to it having lived in Pleistocene North America and had to evade predators specializing in hunting megafauna like Saber-Toothed Cats, Dire Wolves, and of course later on humans. In fact, if we assume it crossed the land bridge into North America (it would’ve had too if it’s an ape) then they’ve been dealing with Saber-Tooths for millions of years, which is plenty of time for them to evolve very effective strategies for staying hidden.

[@cabininthewoods517]

That’s a fascinating theory, Danny, and it ties into some interesting ideas about survival and adaptation. If Bigfoot has been around since the Pleistocene, evading predators like saber-toothed cats and dire wolves would certainly pressure it to develop exceptional stealth and survival strategies. The notion of an elusive species persisting across millennia also lines up with how other species adapt to extreme environments or threats. The idea that Bigfoot crossed the land bridge and inherited these survival instincts adds another layer of plausibility to its evasiveness in modern times. Thanks for sharing your perspective-it’s definitely thought-provoking!

[@dannybright8708]

@@cabininthewoods517thanks for the response! I’ll take this a step further by saying that the elusiveness adaptation might have predated the arrival of Bigfoot’s lineage to North America. I will point out that the fossil record tells us that Eurasia was a massive hub for apes during the Miocene epoch, and if we are to believe the stories of other Bigfoot-like creatures in Eurasia (Yeti, Yeren and Almas) it made sense to me that Bigfoot’s origins were somewhere in Eurasia. These possible relatives of Bigfoot seem to be just as elusive, and Saber-Toothed Cats also had a presence in Eurasia for the last 20 million years (to say nothing of the Pantherine cats that live today and also probably hunted apes). Bigfoot’s size may have been selected for to ward off these predators, only for the predators to evolve larger sizes themselves and larger teeth to boot. Idk I just think “Ice Age Bigfoot” is a very fun idea that I wish was discussed more. It doesn’t even seem that out of place alongside what we know existed in that time.

[@MWhaleK]

Bigfoot is much more believable than the Duckbilled platypus.

[@cabininthewoods517]

True enough!

[@Sparks53]

Fred in Alaska who has the podcast Subarctic Alaska Sasquatch, could to take this disbeliever to places that would absolutely change his beliefs about Sasquatch.

[@rickyl9540]

There is plenty of proof. But an eye witness on it's own is actually proof and there are thousands of people around the world that have seen and experienced Sasquatch. In a court of law an eye witness can send someone to prison for life so it is a powerful point. I have met numerous people that have had Sasquatch experiences and they are regular credible people that had their lives dramatically altered. Often after an encounter people become quite obsessed with having another as a entire new world has opened up and they are never the same again.

[@mirrorblue100]

People believe what they want to believe. I just accept these creatures are real and don't care what anyone else thinks.

[@mikewatkins1725]

Thank you.

[@mikewatkins1725]

9:15 what skull is portrayed here?

[@kyuss89]

More points to the possibility, dare I say the probability that these creatures exists than not. Just go down the rabbit hole and find out