Want to get Smarter, Faster™? Subscribe for DAILY videos: bigth.ink/SmarterFaster
@mdranjankhan73994 жыл бұрын
What if Einstein is not born
@manjsher30944 жыл бұрын
Don't do drugs
@MegaGeorge19484 жыл бұрын
"Want to get Smarter, Faster™?" Sorry, my brain cannot exceed the speed of light.
@ishworshrestha35594 жыл бұрын
Ol
@hammertimebaby4 жыл бұрын
No
@Mohit-jl8kl4 жыл бұрын
Me at school : Fails in physics exam Me at KZbin : *_What if Einstein is wrong_*
@csmeitt11884 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@Mohit-jl8kl4 жыл бұрын
@@csmeitt1188 😂😂😂
@sayainsights4 жыл бұрын
lmao same. On KZbin we are searching Einstein, Newton, Tesla and on paper I can't solve shit
@MeasuredFlat4 жыл бұрын
Nobody could do the math Einstein came up with. Not because they were not as smart but because it was fraudulent. You can learn science without ever having to go to school. A degree to go into debt for is just a piece of paper giving you permission to work in the field of your choice. It is a nice scam.
@L0rbass4 жыл бұрын
@@MeasuredFlat Bullshit
@MrWarhead169 жыл бұрын
Einsten would be glad to be proven wrong if enough evidence is provided.
@AlchemistOfNirnroot9 жыл бұрын
Jessrey Mark Solijon He's a true scientist.
@smthb1239 жыл бұрын
AlchemistOfNirnroot *was
@SecretlyStarscream9 жыл бұрын
AlchemistOfNirnroot Do you claim that he's still alive?
@misterde52049 жыл бұрын
Yes...beautiful hu?
@uchihahikaku16309 жыл бұрын
+Jessrey Mark I bet Einstein didn't even know his own self. So how could he know the entire universe?
@RafaelRabinovich8 жыл бұрын
I think Einstein said: If I am right, the Germans will say that I am a German, and the French will call me a "citizen of the world". But, said Einstein, if I am wrong, the French will say that I am a German, and the Germans will say that I am a Jew!
@lireggieil56468 жыл бұрын
such is life
@3mtanzsport2918 жыл бұрын
It turned out to be just a error of measurment. Nothing is faster than c and Einstein still is German ;-)
@gsanewphysics89028 жыл бұрын
The problems of general relativity arise when you look at the Universe at very small or at very large scales. What's wrong with general relativity ? New finding in 2010 you don't know before, in general theory of relativity Albert Einstein ignored refraction of light. Einstein's proving method (EPM) via eclipse is unscientific and deeply wrong. It is very surprising. Einstein was wrong. Please read on the reliable source the book The Universe and DR.Einstein, by Lincoln Barnett, London, 1949, Preface by Albert Einstein himself, page 78 - 79. Einstein's gravity is wrong. Deflection of light is caused by refraction, not gravity. Shapiro delay is false, time delay is caused by refraction, not gravity. Gravitational redshift is false.Redshift is caused by refraction. Redshift is not Doppler shift, Lensing is caused by refraction, not gravity.....etc.
@ImranKhan-cz3rg8 жыл бұрын
jew factor
@assalane7 жыл бұрын
+GSA New Physics Let me guess. You never read the book, you got your information from a pseudo science blog, and you have no idea how refraction works. Am I close?
@steffliot37884 жыл бұрын
He explains everything so well. This person is great.
@alphagt624 жыл бұрын
He does have a gift for explaining extremely complex subjects.
@srishtirana91914 жыл бұрын
You are a swifty
@steffliot37884 жыл бұрын
@@srishtirana9191 well yes i am a swifty. cheers.
@vidcooldrake30594 жыл бұрын
@@steffliot3788 what is a swifty?
@steffliot37884 жыл бұрын
@@vidcooldrake3059 A Taylor Swift stan. I see you fancy drake;)
@hippis5638 жыл бұрын
Its so nice to listen to Michio when he explain, its just pure joy !
@lireggieil56468 жыл бұрын
because he is a good actor
@DemHighTimes8 жыл бұрын
*on startalk he always acts better than Chuck, but then again I would too*
@derkaiser79687 жыл бұрын
II Reggie II, he is a scientist, not an actor. Why do you even claim that shit? For some likes?
@hippis5637 жыл бұрын
He act in the lerning of sciens, if he would talk pure fact you could not lissen and thats called Retorik, if he just talk facts any new would not lissen. And for other he has theorised request like light saber,warp, and so much more. Becuse of this if you whant sciens you need to lissen and lern from your mistakes !
@derkaiser79687 жыл бұрын
Mats Johansson Science* Listen* Rhetoric*. Till nästa gång. ;)
@giorgiomauceri4105 жыл бұрын
"So in a sense, they are using relativity to disprove relativity" Michio Thanos, 2012
@chewinggum55503 жыл бұрын
I didnt get the thanos part
@giorgiomauceri4103 жыл бұрын
@@chewinggum5550 one of Thanos's most famous lines is "I used the stones to destroy the stones". They're similar
@chewinggum55503 жыл бұрын
@@giorgiomauceri410 ohh
@b_f_d_d3 жыл бұрын
😂
@Hardstuckval4203 жыл бұрын
I think they use the ether
@svs43054 жыл бұрын
I remember in school when I'm calculating speed of a car on a physics problem I found out that it was faster than speed of light. I was shocked at my multiplication capability
@shunyabinduinteriors Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@anuragchowdhury41013 жыл бұрын
This video is the best example for showcasing the misunderstanding which arises by only reading the Headline of news which is more often than not misleading. And the truth is revealed when one reads the whole news.
@pedrojuan80505 жыл бұрын
"GPS, Nuclear weapons..." Me : "Dang that escalated quickly"
@rayx89575 жыл бұрын
Yup
@godjususst.pierre72555 жыл бұрын
I near get my reward fore all the work t j at i did more then whate i was suporter dow the promis me money i near got but i dont give up
@MrPatatoHead5 жыл бұрын
Hahaaha
@spitshinetommy37215 жыл бұрын
I was just trying to find the nearest donut shop.
@timothyblazer17494 жыл бұрын
GPS doesnt prove relativity. There are no relativistic corrections on GPS satellites. Talk to the people who built them Secondly, nuclear power and weapons were known to be possible prior to Einstein, and could have happened without his work.. All Einstein did was mathematically harmonize newton with a few other theories. Mr. Kaku should know all of this. He is propagating cancer and stupidity.
@T33K3SS3LCH3N5 жыл бұрын
He is talking about the OPERA experiment in 2011, which turned out to be a faulty measurement due two to errors in their equipment. Two months after this video was uploaded, an attempt to reproduce the experiment failed to exceed the speed of light in full accordance with relativity theory. Another three months later they had fully analysed the original experiment and concluded that it simply was a faulty measurement.
@Jonathynn5 жыл бұрын
T33K3SS3LCH3N thank you sir
@ERWebster5 жыл бұрын
Why is this not the top comment? Thank you.
@JeremyHurtt4 жыл бұрын
This is why I was reading the comments. Thanks!
@hustle_tee2 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@shushuyu10 жыл бұрын
I really respect that physicist have the balls to admit that some of their theories could be wrong while some groups won't ever imagine that conclusion.
@alz23010 жыл бұрын
everything could be wrong ... that's how science is. Everything is a theory waiting to be replaced. Everything is refutable
@eternitynaut10 жыл бұрын
alz230 The problem is that the scientists themselves are flawed, ordinary humans and they protect their accomplishments and are not quick to embrace change. This can be both and good thing and a bad thing. Don't get me wrong though, compared to other things in life, the pace of science is still one of the fastest when it comes to progress and regardless of egos, the truth will always prevail.
@MKeehl2310 жыл бұрын
kalimul Egos are stronger than to admit new theories.
@shushuyu10 жыл бұрын
Mello Keehl Especially if like most creationists they were taught ever since they were young. It's kind of hard to throw away something that you thought you knew for 20+ years. Another unfortunate thing is some groups shun their family and friends just because they don't want to be proven wrong. It's a narrow-minded life for some folks.
@Kevin1504710 жыл бұрын
That's science in a nutshell.
@ananthu44444 жыл бұрын
I saved this to my playlist, only to play when someone is around me who might peek to find out what I am watching
@mind-h4i4 жыл бұрын
They'll probably think he is a smartass or an intellectual
@brenmatttaming40873 жыл бұрын
LOL
@MadWorldEarth3 жыл бұрын
👊😄👍
@thandokuhlemsomi30873 жыл бұрын
I swear to God dats what I'm doing right now.... I'm in a room full of my sisters friends
@scottyj62263 жыл бұрын
I like your style dude.
@robst2479 жыл бұрын
What a wonderful man! I would love to have him as my physics teacher. He has everything a great teacher needs: abundant intelligence and knowledge, great anecdotes, also a tremendous vitality and wit. He's passionate about his subject, but he doesn't take it or himself too seriously. He also radiates simple, down-to-earth human warmth, unlike many physicists.
@dlwatib9 жыл бұрын
+Rob Stuart I can't stand him. He's arrogant.
@robst2479 жыл бұрын
dlwatib I don't find him arrogant at all. I would say he is self-confident and passionate
@robst2479 жыл бұрын
***** Hate? That seems an unnecessarily strong emotion.
@robst2479 жыл бұрын
+IAmKing720 Whatever turns you on! You have to live with it.
@robst2479 жыл бұрын
james eremine The world desperately needs people who understand science and can passionately explain it to non-scientists, especially because so many young people are turning against science. Just look at all the pseudoscience and anti-science suspicion and even hatred here on KZbin. Researching and publishing isn't a prerequisite.
@gladJonas8 жыл бұрын
Thanks for spoiling Superman....
@-_Nuke_-7 жыл бұрын
HAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAA xD
@georgemorley10297 жыл бұрын
gladJonas Well played!
@dallasoconnell86937 жыл бұрын
gladJonas you wasn’t going to watch it
@1UpsForLife6 жыл бұрын
lol hi jonas i didnt expect to see you as the top comment
@aceburgers88016 жыл бұрын
If an individual has not seen Superman, well then they deserve to be spoiled.
@7scarld1705 жыл бұрын
Albert Einstein: What If Michio Kaku Is Wrong?
@taragragg4005 жыл бұрын
Rival Gangs. The Swiss get beat up.
@PaoloCostaBaldi5 жыл бұрын
Well, Michio Kaku is actually saying Einstein was not wrong: he clearly says he thinks there was an error in the calibration of the system used in the latest experiment, therefore Einstein was right
@rr-dy5ij5 жыл бұрын
Paolo Costa r/wooosh
@omarabdelkadereldarir74585 жыл бұрын
O3o
@hezekiahwill5 жыл бұрын
This made me laugh.
@g.alistar77984 жыл бұрын
“Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position but certainty is absurd.” Voltaire
@dmonkeyluffy623 жыл бұрын
@Hans Coventrierenhabenmachen In case you are serious and not trolling, I suppose you are referring to volts (V) who were named in honour of Alessandro Volta. And AFAIK, Voltaire wasn't a physicist. Nevertheless, he was also a scientist
@KorAllRBare3 жыл бұрын
If I were to refer to everything, it would be a Closed and isolated system, Behold I refer to the Universe, in short a finite ergo a CERTAINTY, is that absurd? NO! Truth "Facts" can never be absurd, truth is certain, contradictions though are uncertain, so honestly why is this certainty which is everything absurd? I insist all uncertainties treated as certainties are the absurd, and it's high time more data is accrued so that all uncertainty is eliminated..
@g.alistar77983 жыл бұрын
@@KorAllRBare well…..that’s a start!
@KiNGKuNTa9865 жыл бұрын
Einstein would rather be happy if he is proven wrong.cause knowing the truth is more important. Ego inversely proportional to knowledge.
@megacosmic65075 жыл бұрын
Well said sir
@michelguy55695 жыл бұрын
Perfectly agree ! The more you know the more you realize all what you didn't know, this is a big lesson of humility. For me a true genious is modest, humble. He know much than the common people, understand better lots of things, but this level of understanding and comprehension push him to realize that all is knowledge is quite ridiculous compared to all his ignorance.
@dsbiddle5 жыл бұрын
Robertson longjam - oh yeah? Einstein told you this?
@ronerickson80835 жыл бұрын
If you correct an error of Einstein which has stunted the growth of physics for about 110 years would someone please proof this E=mv^3 where v = lights variable speed. If this is not proofed you will not believe the result. It comes out being that light speed is possible means Einstein made a human error since we are all human and did not take into account that light is variable due to its speed can change such as a speed in a different medium since this has already been proved by the lights refractive index.
@AKA-0775 жыл бұрын
Robertson longjam einstein was fraud and he stole the theory of relativity
@fordz37815 жыл бұрын
If someone could prove him wrong in all this. That would be scientific find of the century.
@h01975 жыл бұрын
Maybe you can do it, you'll never know, if you do Physics
@godjususst.pierre72555 жыл бұрын
I did have of the mishen when i fist stared it i was called alier that i near beet the mishen when poeple prove it
@godjususst.pierre72555 жыл бұрын
That just dont wont two here the truth
@sidgerard49665 жыл бұрын
Oliver St.pierre Dude you have to learn how to spell.
@flymasterA5 жыл бұрын
Red Rat , My point precisely. Theory is not truth.
@armynso9 жыл бұрын
Einstein: What If Michio Kaku Is Wrong?
@jamilhneini10029 жыл бұрын
armynso dat plot twist
@KOSHY689 жыл бұрын
***** Read my research papers in the following link to understand how Einstein's theory does not stand the test of time. www.researchgate.net/profile/Pradeep_Koshy4
@jamilhneini10029 жыл бұрын
Pradeep Koshy but it's toooo long
@shandon3609 жыл бұрын
+armynso Well Kaku even explained possible theories to why the SWISS were wrong. He wasn't even the one to come up with the anti-relativity hypothesis.
@Ryan-wx8of9 жыл бұрын
+Jacob Zondag Did you not watch the video? MK is arguing that relativity still holds and the experiment was flawed..which is was
@imperialguardsman91414 жыл бұрын
Ahh I see, so what you're saying is, einstein was Probably right.
@saiku90814 жыл бұрын
I don't get wat he is talkin' bout
@cheetoortiz23614 жыл бұрын
U big brain
@VarunOregunta4 жыл бұрын
No buddy they goofed these secrets. But I think the CERN has a delay due to the some loss of fiber wire. Which in delayed the collision.
@cucumber_9994 жыл бұрын
Varun Oregunta haha that is exactly what happened! but Einstein hasn’t even finished his work?? what is light relèvent to! they think tachyons could move faster instead of neutrinos
@Chinook__4 жыл бұрын
How so did you conclude this? I’m a philosopher 🇺🇸
@LondonCityGirl10 жыл бұрын
He explains things so well.
@benjaminwells391010 жыл бұрын
Because things make sense in his head like that. He sees the math and thinks that ^ so he can explain it to us commoners lol.
@akhildevasia72236 жыл бұрын
We can reverse time
@akhildevasia72236 жыл бұрын
But I need an answer
@sciencenerd83266 жыл бұрын
Anu V A Anu I don't know ask Einstine.
@ramzisuleiman84696 жыл бұрын
see my remark about his inaccuracies ...
@Bincle8 жыл бұрын
I didn't come here for Superman spoilers, GEEZ!
@LukeSumIpsePatremTe7 жыл бұрын
Imagine watching Superman with Dr. Michio Kaku
@awkweird_panda7 жыл бұрын
LukeSumIpsePatremTe this comment made my day 😂😂
@jensraab29027 жыл бұрын
I hate spoilers and can feel you. Nevertheless, be soft on Mr Kaku for spoiling a movie that's been released almost 40 years ago (in 1978).
@Reach13357 жыл бұрын
Jon Snow is a Targaryen in the show but probably won't be in the books(unless it was a triplet birth.)...How about this spoiler, do you find it more to your liking?
@Dropz_RSA7 жыл бұрын
Lol
@this_mfr9 жыл бұрын
If it wasn't for Einstein questioning the current state and understanding of physics, in his day, let alone the top physicist at his time (Isaac Newton), then he would never discovered anything. Moral of the story? Always question. Einstein's theories might be just one small step towards the greater picture, just as Newton was for relativity. To assume that one guy had it all correct and we need not question his theory is to not be scientific whatsoever.
@xnoreq8 жыл бұрын
+It's Me Einstein didn't question the then current state. In fact, he built on the work/discoveries of e.g. Lorentz and Maxwell.
@thisisblackmesa8 жыл бұрын
+John Doe before relativity, there was 2 theories about the speed of light: Isaac Newton thought that light and gravity acts instantly. So Einstein did prove Newton Wrong as we know. Also, Newton's equations could not explain Planet Mercury's orbit, but Einstein's equation explained it. It was a big step towards the validation of relativity.
@xnoreq8 жыл бұрын
Molun The speed of light had already been measured before Einstein.
@this_mfr8 жыл бұрын
It's not so much the speed of light that Einstein questioned, but it's behavior in relation to everything else (including time and space). Einstein had the insight to see that the speed of light was the same for all observers, and basic algebra would show that if one thing stays constant, everything else must give (that being time and space). It was such a profound thing to claim, but something that was not considered or discussed in his day, or ever in the past. That's what I meant about questioning the current state and understanding of physics. He wasn't questioning the laws, per se, but how those laws interacted with each other. It was just a simple paradigm shift. But that same principle can be applied today. Perhaps our understanding of light, space, and time is still skewed because of some simple change of perspective no one has yet to notice?
@xnoreq8 жыл бұрын
No, it was Lorentz that formulated the idea of length contraction and time dilation based on more precise measurements of the speed of light that had been done. Then before Einstein Poincaré had already worked with a constant speed of light and relativity, building upon Lorentz' work. Lorentz' original theory contained however an absolute ether that could neither be experimentally confirmed nor is it compatible with relativity. Poincaré knew that. So Einstein dropped the ether, postulated that Lorentz transformed coordinate systems are frames of reference (which are a theoretical construct) ... and that's special relativity. He also noticed that the speed of light is not just about light by recognizing c in Maxwell's equations. You see, this was a chain of small steps taken by several smart people and technological advances were also very important in order to be able to do the experiments.
@iyand66463 жыл бұрын
Finally found another physicist aside from Neil DeGrasse Tyson who can explain complicated stuff and make a regular man like me somehow understand.
@bosshogg84473 жыл бұрын
And you found one who isn’t a pompous, asshole like that infamous “scoffer” Idiot Neil. You’ve upgraded. Well played.
@huskiehuskerson53003 жыл бұрын
@@bosshogg8447 ikr 😆
@BFPerry2202 жыл бұрын
Its not something to understand. And I honestly don't think someone traveling right under lightspeed is traveling to the future, while just past lighspeed were then traveling to the past. What in the Marvel Multiverse bullshit is that logic? Its whatever, humans will die off long before getting to even 1% of lightspeed.
@dianelines Жыл бұрын
look up Dr Brian Cox
@julythrunov Жыл бұрын
Brian Cox does it better
@kledi38175 жыл бұрын
I'm way too stupid for this
@pristoste5 жыл бұрын
no, admitting you don't know something is also an act of intelligence
@magnusvinter98875 жыл бұрын
I can asure you that you are not stupid. Stupid is way to broad a term to be used for a person.
@Scarletraven875 жыл бұрын
Me explain Bernard. No use termometer in sunlight. You dum dum.
@-Vitalis-5 жыл бұрын
**Socrates has entered the chat**
@-Vitalis-5 жыл бұрын
@@tentailmadara2500 10/10
@TangFiend18 жыл бұрын
Einstein would be happy to be wrong.
@heldersufiano28168 жыл бұрын
+Robert “TangFiend” James .......i cannot agree MORE!!!............YOU damn right!!!
@equliguemasse63148 жыл бұрын
+Robert „TangFiend“ James it is just f(x) = 2² ...
@AlWwW18 жыл бұрын
incorrect, Einstein would be happy to be proven wrong*
@carlxross80138 жыл бұрын
Wrong, Doctor Einstein would be happy to be proven wrong*
@vivigesso37568 жыл бұрын
He promised the Nobel prize money to his ex wife for child support. He later added the cosmic constant to his equations to created a static universe. "the Einstein blunder" that also proved with that addition to the equation to show an expanding universe. The constant he added would be what he'd be happy to have gotten wrong. just a TL;DR :)
@Nightlurk9 жыл бұрын
I'm a programmer and when doing debugging, it often saves a lot of time to ask yourself the question "where did I botched up" and just start from the presumption that you made a coding mistake which is altering the entire thread and hence the output (inside out) than to start the process backwards from the symptoms of the problem, through the entire thread, towards the source of the problem (outside in). Obviously this is not always the best solution, and you need many years of experience to gain this instinct of guesstimating directly the source of the problem than going through the normal process, and some times it just doesn't work and your instinct is wrong, you must always keep in mind that everything is possible and be opened to the possibility that you may be totally wrong. I guess the point I'm trying to make is, most of the times, the most simplest explanation is the right explanation for an apparently inexplicable phenomenon. In this case, there is much more likely a problem in the actual method of measurement of the experiment, than the theory of relativity being wrong. However, that does not mean the theory of relativity is bullet proof, and a good scientist must keep that in mind, because nothing is more disruptive to progress than not being able to see the forest because of the trees. If in this particular case the simplest explanation is the measurements being wrong, it's possible that in other cases, the simplest explanation might just be that relativity is not quite that... relative.
@TheGargalon9 жыл бұрын
I don't believe that there is a scientist who thinks that relativity is the end of physics and should be written in stone tablets somewhere and left for the generations. Every theory should be thought of as "not yet proved wrong", or "the best we have". And relativity is had been pretty useful so far. I mean, everything tech related we have because of Einstein's work. So is relativity 100% correct? Probably not. Is it good enough for now? Hell yea.
@WMTeWu9 жыл бұрын
Nerubz That's what I like in Science. We (as humanity) may one day discover that speed of light is not strictly constant but depends on something. If this happens, it won't mean that everything need recalibration and Einstein was wrong, it will just mean that Einstein was on the right track but just didn't see the bigger picture and it would mean that we'll be able to do more than we could before. Considering how little we know about the time, I think that theory of relativity just scratched the surface of something much much bigger.
@MrKrinkelz9 жыл бұрын
THEN BAM!! you just missed a semi-colon
@gfetco9 жыл бұрын
GoodGameHunter Ever heard of Test Driven Development?
@TheGargalon9 жыл бұрын
Enlightenment I have, and I think it's a nice concept but very impractical.
@Mohit-jl8kl4 жыл бұрын
Einstein's last words were : *_Don't believe any quote said by anyone I said including this one_*
@myw6r5d864 жыл бұрын
That's Buddha
@samichloricacid4 жыл бұрын
lmao no, his lasts words were in german and the nurse didnt know german
@mitxunjumaboev54544 жыл бұрын
@@samichloricacid that nurse must be lived whole sad life because of not understanding Einstein.
@rintea42064 жыл бұрын
@@samichloricacid R/wooosh
@ishworshrestha35594 жыл бұрын
Ok
@CyborgsupermanX5 жыл бұрын
Couldve given a spoiler alert for the superman movie jeez
@nareshwildbones5 жыл бұрын
Actually, i didnt watch the movie and just went and saw the clip after this😂
@blackstar53554 жыл бұрын
Yeah ikr, he just jumped right in
@myview99233 жыл бұрын
There was a pop-up saying spoiler alert from 1978 to 1988
@ishworshrestha35593 жыл бұрын
Ok
@r.b.ratieta61116 жыл бұрын
The governing mantra of science: "It is not about what we know -- it's about what we believe to know thus far..." Einstein blew Newton out of the water, though he didn't necessarily contradict him. Newton blew Copernicus and Galileo out of the water, though he didn't necessarily contradict them." Knowledge is always growing, new laws become old laws, and old laws are changed by new discoveries. There very likely is a chance that someone could shatter Einstein's theories, just as much as Einstein's theories could be irrevocable. The great mysteries of science.
@doradora78136 жыл бұрын
R.B. Ratieta my friend even newton Called gravity as a myterious force einstine defined relativity with sufficient proofs
@ramzisuleiman84696 жыл бұрын
actually I had already done that. But almost nobody wants to listen. As a start, please have a look at my public talk: www.researchgate.net/publication/323691934_The_Crisis_of_Modern_Theoretical_Physics_and_its_Simple_and_Beautiful_Solution
@geoffblankenmeyer70816 жыл бұрын
IOW, the former just expounded on the latter.
@fcssefvvgattrfdx4876 жыл бұрын
The great mysteries of the “religion” science
@ToiletPaper20206 жыл бұрын
R.B. Ratieta No one will ever shatter Einstein's theories. Einstein was NEVER once wrong and never will be. Now, you can expand from his knowledge and not contradict him as you even stated but you will never in your life discredit him. For example, NASA states space is a square with no edges. Einstein did not understand the geometrical shape of space at that time because the actual density of space was not measured. There is no such thing as a square with no edges. Space is made of parallel circles with infinite curvature that cause the equal and opposite reaction of flat parallel lines in the interior and accelerated expansion. Physicists state that Einstein's theories stop at black holes when gravity pushes and it does not pull. Thus, the gravity of the atom that caused the Big Bang is pushing against the deflating gravity of the universe when time space is broken down in a black hole. They attempted to discredit Einstein and failed so miserably that they became flat Earthers as a result.
@SalmonPowered11 жыл бұрын
It's incredible to me that all the technology we've implemented so far that relies on general and special relativity has worked perfectly. The fact that Einstein's theories haven't failed us even once just goes to show how incredible he really was.
@hamzahashim47412 жыл бұрын
Besides being a great theoretical physicist, he is also a great science communicator! One of my favourite personalities in science.
@slow-mo_moonbuggy2 жыл бұрын
Really? What is your favorite scientific theory of his?
@MRTOWELRACK10 жыл бұрын
I love how half speed can make anyone seem a little drunk or high.
@Elsombrero51210 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@horusloko10 жыл бұрын
Principally Jeff Goldblum.
@jsnam813910 жыл бұрын
You made my day bro
@MultiPotato5510 жыл бұрын
He's high as fuck! :DD
@Codester14510 жыл бұрын
Oh my god, I died laughing. That's amazing.
@ErikANilsen694 жыл бұрын
Einstein struggled with his theories , especially GR, during his mid to late career. He questioned a lot of their fundamentals. He even wrote a personal letter to a friend claiming that one day his theories would likely be replaced because at least one of his assumptions is wrong. Evidence for a timeless universe is building. That is, the universe may evolve in only 3 spatial dimensions. In a timeless universe, time is independent parameter used when making measurement of things in 3D. The starlight deflection calculation that helped launch GR into stardom and replace Newtonian physics can also be done using purely Newtonian physics. Unfortunately the corrected calculation only happened recently, so it will be met with skepticism, etc...a lot more more such calculations are needed before people start to take a 3D timeless universe seriously. Whatever happens, Einstein will still be remembered, by many, as one of the greatest scientists of the 20th century planet (and that is my view too).
@denegregg91224 жыл бұрын
You are on the right track. The Universe cannot begin the way it is presented at his point. The expansion theory in itself is an admission of error or lack of understanding. WATCH THIS SPACE. Dene GREGG. AUSTRALIA
@cpt1910214 жыл бұрын
what a coincidence almost like he ran out of material he stole from being a patent clerk
@denegregg91224 жыл бұрын
@@cpt191021 RE: last comment correction (this point not his point) > Science has in some respects drifted away from reality. Theory and Calculation does not always answer the questions we cannot see or accurately measure. Put it this way, just because super glue sticks most substances together well, does not mean that it fills holes just as well. It doesn't. My disagreement is that Inflation theory attempts to do a similar feat. . . with similar results. It astounds me that highly paid scientists from most areas don't apply the fundamentals to come up with their assumptions. . . and much of it is merely hazy assumptions at best. Seriously, the Universe is physical in nature. That is why E=mc2. Inflation theory is like asking a Sheep " Dear Mr. Sheep, what is the answer to our existence? The Sheeps' answer is generally more plausible. Sheeps' answer is Baaaa ! I could go on, however it seems pointless (RE: Big Bang, Inflation Theory, Hubble Constant etc. . . . . . Oh ! don't knock Eistein too much. He did always try to make sense of his theories and thoughts... and he had the sense to flee from the Dictator who ruled over another mob of sheep... Agghhh ! or is that Baaah !
@fuzzygreen36349 жыл бұрын
The title should be "Michio Kaku: Einstein Isn't Wrong"
@WMTeWu9 жыл бұрын
Atlas Slates Then noone would bother to listen to the obvious ;)
@Hankextreme9 жыл бұрын
Atlas Slates he actually talked about the scenario where Einstein was wrong, so the title is correct.
@ilyaaaaaaaaaaaas9 жыл бұрын
Atlas Slates It should be called:"you can't beat relativity with relativity".
@SonicGraffitiArtistisAmazing9 жыл бұрын
I love how the people that are watching this have SpongeBob and Pikachu as their profile pic. It's like they're just giving society the middle finger, as if to say 'PEOPLE WHO WATCH SPONGEBOB AND POKEMON ARE NOT ALL STUPID!'
@Hankextreme9 жыл бұрын
SonicGraffitiArtist Well I watch neither. I just love the derp face pikachu does. I have a whole collection of about 40 pictures with all derp pictures of Pikachu. You can google "retarded Pikachu" and find out for yourself xD
@Headbangerr-en2cc3 жыл бұрын
He looks on this thumbnail like he would say: "Your soul is mine!"
@darkstar74623 жыл бұрын
*"Your brother soul is mine!"*
@asdfasdf82743 жыл бұрын
Mortal Combat. Classic
@polatbulent75885 жыл бұрын
What if einstein is wrong EINSTEIN: *you dare opose me mortal*
@hendrik4575 жыл бұрын
@heatedvoltz....... Okay?
@hendrik4575 жыл бұрын
@heatedvoltz yeah you being a bit slow
@polatbulent75885 жыл бұрын
Wow what a great coment section
@IMCYT5 жыл бұрын
Oppose*
@reds7vn6445 жыл бұрын
@heatedvoltz No they didn't. It was a computer simulation of a photo of a black hole. Einstein was proven wrong through Frame Dragging or the lack of it.
@subliminalcastillo21266 жыл бұрын
The greatest advacements in science were not made by coat-tailing on others ideas, but from challenging old ideas constantly.
@fiend6526 жыл бұрын
Lmao why is everyone in the comment section mad?
@javierherrera87826 жыл бұрын
They need some milk
@alberttorres49176 жыл бұрын
@@javierherrera8782 From his mama.lol
@ghawk12326 жыл бұрын
I'm mad because I'm right and everyone ignores me. :( Regarding time, relativity, and two planes flying opposite directions with atomic clocks (Hafele-Keating experiment) ... There is reason to doubt it because, as proven by Reich, orgone (life) energy affects rates of radioactive decay. A plane moving one direction moves through more of it in one direction vs ground and the other. For the same reason, Pons & Fleischmann may have been correct about cold fusion. If the container they used to control temperature was built more like an orgone accumulator than those who tried to reproduce it. Radioactive decay rates are not constant as assumed. You can see them change over the next few days just subjecting samples to 50KV for 30 minutes (AC or DC, doesn't matter). For that reason, our dates are unreliable with carbon-dating, it depends on how many times the sample has been hit by lightning. On a similar note, the Samsung phone batteries that were exploding would be those delivered from Korea with a flight near the pole when the aurora was active. See: A Theory about the Boeing 787 Lithium-Ion Battery Problem Belief in accreditation is for CYA and so we don't have to think much. I don't need no stinking bachelors, I have a gift. :P
@taylorryan60436 жыл бұрын
garyha I don't need a bachelors*
@grovegreen1236 жыл бұрын
Hey albert
@davidseed29394 жыл бұрын
the systematic error was that there was a reel of fibre optic “cable” in the light path (hidden somewhere) that hadn’t been accounted for.
@scurus11scurus4 жыл бұрын
for reel?
@StarryStarryNocturne3 жыл бұрын
Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.
@JasTheKariol5 жыл бұрын
Albert Einstein: “There could be no fairer destiny for any… theory than that it should point the way to a more comprehensive theory in which it lives on, as a limiting case."
@memoryofthestars74496 жыл бұрын
What if Einstein, Newton, and others were slightly wrong or biased or incomplete? Welcome to the world where nobody knows anything finally.
@sarwarghouris6 жыл бұрын
Memory of the Stars How can you call something knowledge which always changes ~Socrates
@burnerjack016 жыл бұрын
Math, when properly applied, is never wrong, biased or incomplete.
@memoryofthestars74496 жыл бұрын
@@sarwarghouris well knowledge is knowing something about something at any given time. However I didn't get your point with that quote?
@sarwarghouris6 жыл бұрын
But the essence of knowledge is that it must be timeless and must have a universality Which science lacks, but we're working on it to refine it as much as possible
@memoryofthestars74496 жыл бұрын
@@sarwarghouris nope knowledge can be temporary or inconsistent. Knowledge literally mean knowing about something. It's very subjective all those theories of "universality" etc only fits with a certain things which is once again very subjective.
@ezekielmajor55118 жыл бұрын
There is one thing faster than the speed of light - a man on a beer run 10 minutes before the game is about to start.
@Real-Ruby-Red6 жыл бұрын
Helios77711 you are an earthling
@ezekielmajor55116 жыл бұрын
shut up and have a little humor you nimrod.
@michaelpaulos4203 жыл бұрын
I've been following you on public TV for years. I'm so happy I found you on KZbin. Thank you very very much for your service. You make pondering the cosmos fun.
@Imsuper6568 жыл бұрын
It was due to a equipment malfunction.
@BillGreenAZ6 жыл бұрын
Correct. But Mr. Kaka here says it was due to an error in calculating a relativistic system. Just another time he has been wrong in his videos and people eat this stuff up. SMH.
@matthewdavix76456 жыл бұрын
They think it is a mistake but they have not found any malfunction. In other words, physicists are trying to prove they are right without the proving there is a mistake.
@jessstuart74956 жыл бұрын
And disclosing potentially revolutionary results before reviewing all the possible sources of error. Sloppy and undisciplined physics leads to this kind of bullcrap.
@mikeladnun46475 жыл бұрын
A Japanese Einstein, it's always interesting to listen to this man (Michio Kaku) and I think it would be really cool to meet him. The insights explained on a simple level is the only way I can comprehend. Thanks for the insights!
@AksamRafiz2 жыл бұрын
No need to make him another Einstein, michio kaku is michio kaku.
@galaxia47098 жыл бұрын
Definitely one of the coolest guys on earth.
@NewMechaa20014 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile i stand on the couch puting this on replay for an hour waiting for my mom to come home and be impressed of what her son is actually interested into
@AgileMJOLNIR10 жыл бұрын
There is a reason these are all called "theories" ladies and gentlemen. At any given time Science, Mathematics, Physics etc could change.
@arnabdey3067 жыл бұрын
Einstein would be glad if he knew that he is wrong if enough evidence is provided
@jamesdunn97146 жыл бұрын
But he is not wrong as has been well proven.
@AnonimatosTM6 жыл бұрын
actually he probably got something wrong since Relativity breaks down at the quantum level, and he couldn't stand the idea of quantum entanglement ( spooky action at a distance, as he called it), wich was proven to be real.
@jamesdunn97146 жыл бұрын
The universe did begin with the big bang. Evolve? Yes, so did the universe. Think about the contradictions in your statements.
@AnonimatosTM6 жыл бұрын
the universe did began, and it will probably end when the last black hole evaporates, what we call time is nothing but the ever forward evolution of the universe. At least as far as i understand the laws of physics.
@Gentleazi6 жыл бұрын
lol. as long as there is movement there is time. the reason for ur claim being hard to grasp isnt because everyone except for u has a limited brain, its because ur claim is fucking stupid. please just go away.
@JaDanBar974 жыл бұрын
I remember watching this when i was 18...and i now realise i had no idea what was going on...5 years later after an engineering degree it all makes sense
@Sonyetc3 жыл бұрын
i have a degree in engineering and still don't understand shit, what does speed of light have to do with traveling through time wtf
@inspirex18313 жыл бұрын
@@Sonyetc I am 14 and i Can understand , You just need to Study A Lot of physics.
@Sonyetc3 жыл бұрын
@@inspirex1831 define a lot
@67chevy963 жыл бұрын
Engineers? You guys have no phD?
@DJ-ov2it6 жыл бұрын
Newton was not wrong or proven wrong. His models just dont work at very large scales and more extreme circumstances. Einsteins model works on both scales but also doesnt address the absolute most extreme scales and circumstances. One day there will probably a model that works in all situations which will probably be the theory of everything. It will supercede newton and einstein, but it doesnt mean that they were wrong. Thats the point.
@PADARM6 жыл бұрын
exactly
@vishalikasharma26246 жыл бұрын
Gar Nicht yess
@minerbob43346 жыл бұрын
Exactly, each person's theory is a modified version of the other, Einsteins studies were based on Newton. We will keep modifying it until the theory includes all circumstances.
@chatluktuke136 жыл бұрын
Actually, Stephen Hawking felt, that there could be no single unifying theory which combines both quantum mechanics and relativity or any other theory. He felt that there would only be a set of interlocking theories, which we would just try and make better fitting with each other, and more precise.
@DJ-ov2it6 жыл бұрын
You could not have written a more insane comment. Please dont waste our time, whether youre trolling or serious.
@amirmoore67957 жыл бұрын
Michio makes physics sound fun
@0ooTheMAXXoo06 жыл бұрын
Literally everything you define as fun happens because of physics.
@bingo45196 жыл бұрын
Physics IS FUN. You're just too dumb or uninterested to figure it out.
@aboubakarkaba94366 жыл бұрын
Ghost khiz. I agree physics is the best thing ever and phenomenal but we don’t need to call him dumb 😂 we’re all just a bit hurt about Einstein being wrong that’s all...which I can’t believe
@inkoalawetrust6 жыл бұрын
Well he's a science communicator that's literally his job.
@iwasadeum8 жыл бұрын
Too many people believe these minds now long gone were somehow Gods. Einstein himself acknowledged the possibility that his whole life's work could be wrong. We will never advance until we forget the past and begin to challenge deeply seeded paradigms. Not saying he is wrong, because I'm not a physicist, but the possibility is very real.
@cocowood23168 жыл бұрын
Two idiots who have probably never taken a physics class...
@Frostbiter778 жыл бұрын
Beauty of being human
@sickworld88798 жыл бұрын
The problem is many careers and reputations rely on the accepted theories, this kind of approach in my opinion hinders science and reminescent of the old catholic churches tendancy to ignore theories that might threaten them. Old minds are not usually very open to new ideas, even those scientists. I Personally i believe we have'nt even begun to scratch the surface of what this existence is.
@MrX85038 жыл бұрын
+Gabriel cazorla persson You're not smarter than Einstein and you're wrong.
@mmaallday7 жыл бұрын
KingZam You take Einsteins word as definite and 100% correct and your comeback is "youre not smarter then Einstein" or "all physycists belive in in relativity" therefore anyone who goes againts it must be retarded. Posibbly the greatest mind to ever exist, a guy who could put Einstein to shame, the very person responsible for 75% of modern day technology, Nikola Tesla, thought the theory of relativity was complete horseshit. When asked how it feels to be the smartest person in the world, Einstein replied "I dont know, go ask Tesla" 😘
@ZERO_ULTRA4 жыл бұрын
Here comes the comment sections, where everyone is an expert about time and space than the scientists themselves.
@slooob233 жыл бұрын
And scientists have never *ever* been wrong about anything
@ekathe853 жыл бұрын
Yeah, cause getting in here and calling everyone an idiot is such an interesting contribution
@bosshogg84473 жыл бұрын
Debate is part of what science is about. Questioning things that were previously “established”. If you don’t understand this, I encourage you to take a few science philosophy courses. Stop trying to be a gate keeper. It’s unbecoming, and doesn’t advance science in the least.
@ZERO_ULTRA3 жыл бұрын
@@bosshogg8447 There are limits to the so-called debate. People don't debate about the shape of the earth for example because it's done, we know the earth is round.
@bosshogg84473 жыл бұрын
@@ZERO_ULTRA And who decides what is allowed to be debated, and what isn’t? And why shouldn’t someone be allowed to put forth a theory that “muh Earth is flat”? It will either check out, or it won’t, based on peer review. No offense intended, but I hear stances similar to the one you are making, and it seems like programming to me. It’s not a scientific way of looking at the world. It sounds, in fact, like the resurrection of Old World principles where one did not question the word of people who sat at the top of the church. And look how far that set us back.
@HighSlayerRalton8 жыл бұрын
Should have been called "_Why_ Einstein Isn't Wrong".
@luk11c48 жыл бұрын
Shouldn't, cuz he still can be wrong... But we don't know it yet :P Open title is good for us to describe how (possible) Einstein error will take effect in our reality.
@sivanpelegpsychologist10567 жыл бұрын
He personally hates Einstein. He wishes to outshine Einstein. Appearing all over only to come close as he can to Einstein's celebrity scientist status. I wonder what real contribution this guy has on the real world... I mean, besides sounding pseudo smartellectual
@vladmarcu35367 жыл бұрын
i have the same feeling about him.. he is promoting a string theory which is pure science fiction and there is no fucking way to prove it
@lit3plumber127 жыл бұрын
But you know, views.
@Xfacta124827 жыл бұрын
+Vlad Marcu New things cant be discovered unless you venture outside the realm of what you think is possible.
@thefinnishbolshevik24048 жыл бұрын
There's plenty of models in science that explained stuff pretty well and worked yet were fundamentally incorrect
@xnoreq8 жыл бұрын
+TheFinnishBolshevik Any examples?
@thefinnishbolshevik24048 жыл бұрын
John Doe Various Aether theories and Classical Newtonian physics. Newton wasn't really necessarily incorrect but his model only works roughly and with medium sized things
@xnoreq8 жыл бұрын
TheFinnishBolshevik I don't think that aether "theories" were anything more than hypotheses and classical Newtonian physics works beautifully in many cases. It's not fundamentally wrong, it just didn't take the finite speed of light into account.
@thefinnishbolshevik24048 жыл бұрын
John Doe from the point of view of trying to explain basic physics it doesn't really matter if light is particles or waves going through the aether. Its kinda the same with Newton. His stuff works fine within limits. My point is that our current understanding might be the aether theory of it's day. Within our narrow context it seems to make sense but in the grand scheme of things it could still be wrong. For example so called 'dark energy' is not a real thing. Its just a concept physicists invented to patch some holes in the theory of relativity. Nobody has ever seen or observed 'dark energy' and its probably not even real. It may just be that the whole theory of relativity is somehow wrong in a way we dont understand and it results in these weird glitches and things working differently then they're supposed to. Still 99% of the time it appears to work fine just like Newtonian physics or even some of those aether models.
@xnoreq8 жыл бұрын
TheFinnishBolshevik Our current theories are actual scientific theories supported by mountains of evidence and countless experiments. Aether "theories" were not. That's why I said they were merely hypotheses. 'Dark energy' is a hypothesis too, albeit one that is largely accepted as the one that fits data best so far. But it's still a hypothesized unknown form of energy ... So yeah, that's not exactly scientific theory material either.
@simple84758 жыл бұрын
"I am neither especially clever nor especially gifted. I am only very, very curious." - Albert Einstein
@kommentieren527 жыл бұрын
No
@jeancarlosrosario69907 жыл бұрын
Bullshit. Lol
@enriquelanderos70354 жыл бұрын
"We use relativity to defeat relativity" That's quite a paradox!
@DTM-Books9 жыл бұрын
A big thumbs up for mentioning Superman. Science!
@FLS965 жыл бұрын
When Kaku talks about light and neutrinos from the same event reaching the detectors at the 'same time', does he mean it literally? Mustn't there be at least some latency, since neutrinos have now been proven to have mass?
@eduardop21115 жыл бұрын
Its a coincidence, had it been a few thousand light years farther, there would be a good delay(not saying there was no delay, but in cosmic scales its likely not inportant) But the reason they got here at the same time even though they have mass is bacause they almost ignore matter, and supernovas take a few hours to explode, so the neutrinos at the beginning of the supernova shot out of the star like it as nothing, but the photons took quite some time to leave the star as they were blocked by the matter, and so over these thousands of years the light has been catching up to the neutrinos and we happen to be very close to their point of intersection (Do not take my word for a fact, but i am 90% sure on this info, and if you doubt it, please search for info for this on your own)
@NetAndyCz4 жыл бұрын
Eduardo P is pretty much correct, and Kaku's explanation about neutrinos and photons travelling the same speed is rather incorrect. Neutrinos are slightly slower, but they get a head start.
@Think_Inc4 жыл бұрын
That happened in the 90s. They don't have our detectors then.
@FearTheSirens5 жыл бұрын
“Since the mathematicians have invaded the theory of relativity I do not understand it myself any more. ”
@johntakolander8613 Жыл бұрын
I have a book written by A Einstein himself "On the general and the special relativity theorie". In this book he says that an observer in a closed elevator cannot find a difference between a gravitational acceleration and an acceleration by some kind of towing. He forgot completely the gradient in a gravitational system which can today be measured with a very high precision, nanogals according to geophysicists.
@donalain69 Жыл бұрын
Everybody makes mistakes... even Einstein. Doesn't mean he was wrong in general.
@johntakolander8613 Жыл бұрын
@@donalain69 Here`s a second mistake: Einstein had no knowledge about the Suns humongous magnetic field. This causes the precession of Mercurius` orbit by a paramagnetic effect! Einstein juggled his numbers in the general theory and found that it "explains" the precession exactly.
@Morewilliam9 жыл бұрын
"In 2011, the OPERA experiment mistakenly observed neutrinos appearing to travel faster than light. " from wiki
@Morewilliam9 жыл бұрын
and time do. es not go backward when you go faster than light. I think it's just that you can see things happened before but you are not being in that moment. But I might be wrong im not the physicist here
@Morewilliam9 жыл бұрын
plus the max speed of universe is not determined by the speed of the light, in the opposite, it is the max speed of universe determines the speed of light
@Nucleardave789 жыл бұрын
+Weilun Mo No. When the "speed of light" was determined to be a set figure is what some physicist will find to be just the figure that needs to be fixed. The equipment I have here at my house isn't good enough to tell me by exactly how much but I'm finding that the speed of light must have been based on an average of the visible spectrum. The speed that light travels faster at one end of the spectrum than the other. So, if this is true, the speed of light in an equation and a variable depending on the frequency of light you are using for accuracies sake. There is a lot of light we'll never be able to see because now that the universe is expanding at faster than the "speed of light" any light no matter how bright it is, even if it's as bright as a super nova and shining directly at us and it's generated from only a foot away from us will never be seen it because it's moving away from of us faster than the light can travel towards us.
@HiReeZin9 жыл бұрын
Almost all of the light emitted from that tiny galaxy a foot away, is seen, just because C is constant. That's why the expansion is said to be "metric". 10% of 1 foot is much less for that little photon to fly in a second than 10% of 3,000,001 kilometres. In the latter case the poor particle might face a hopeless task, indeed. That is, if Einstein was right.
@Nucleardave789 жыл бұрын
You would be able to see "faster than light "LIGHT" unless it's traveling AWAY from you because it would be impossible to see something traveling AWAY from you if it's emitted light is moving away from you at a speed greater than it's emissions can travel.
@malcolmt78838 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't be impressed unless the neutrinos arrived at the detector before they were sent.
@quintonlewis72018 жыл бұрын
What if you choose not to fire the neutrinos after seeing them arrive before you actually did anything?
@malcolmt78838 жыл бұрын
Could go with Back to the Future rules?- if you don't send the neutrinos, that reality fades away and nobody remembers receiving the signal.
@ericbatista75828 жыл бұрын
Which means it could have happened but we wouldnt remember it
@adayatatyme8 жыл бұрын
True. I don't like his statement, without basis, that if you exceed the speed of light, time goes backwards! It's cliche.
@quintonlewis72018 жыл бұрын
+is reality is comprised of light segmented by dark matter; the very thing that gives light a home is itself built out of condensed segments (e=mc sq) of the very light whom's highest ambition is to illuminate any and all revisions of itself (every facet of reality). From our level, matter came before the light, and is therefore faster and always a step ahead of the light (manifesting is impossible for light unless it allows itself to be condensed by dark matter in order to manifest on this plane ((fallen angels)) but the light can only do what the dark matter allows for . Anything that can potentially give light energy a platform to persuade all other revisions of itself to override the material world (everything) would give light too much influence (Jesus or some light deity) and eventually it will embody the material and light will have acquired the ability to create matter and obliterate it on the fly (like dreams, we create temporary realities based on intent, then terminate them
@normanshafty7 жыл бұрын
Don't you just wish that he could have been your teacher at school?
@SokumenTop6 жыл бұрын
ammar qahtani why
@docfisher9486 жыл бұрын
no
@agentsmith47356 жыл бұрын
ofcourse yes!!
@Laffy13456 жыл бұрын
normanshafty yes, yes,...
@nullpointerparty6 жыл бұрын
I wish!
@srikanthkal86952 жыл бұрын
What a privilege to watch Dr. Kaku’s Physics Video! I get a pleasure like watching Steven Hawking, Albert Einstein, or Sir C.V.Raman (his simplicity in explaining Physics and clarity has to be seen to be believed).
@ghadymrad7 жыл бұрын
Thank you jimmy page
@idilyaktubay40486 жыл бұрын
Ghady Mrad hahahahaha
@FaizanShakeelKhan6 жыл бұрын
hahahaha
@Alexa16Qc6 жыл бұрын
Hahahahahaha damn
@Tynnyri5l6 жыл бұрын
ha, boi
@azamattf6 жыл бұрын
hahahaaaa
@islamonlysolution4617 жыл бұрын
tesla was right he was not praised because he was not elite
@thegreatnakultiwari54386 жыл бұрын
Einstein is a wrole best geniius he can't be wrong written by Albert Einstein(2 )
@protoman2476 жыл бұрын
Ishaq Niz edgelord
@Littleblaza6 жыл бұрын
TESLA was the king , no one will ever match him , Einstein was a joke math never gets you anywhere in the universe , mathemagic I call it , in the end all theories will fail miserably . .. .
@inkoalawetrust6 жыл бұрын
Yes and a random worker at the patent office is.
@pphilosophy21565 жыл бұрын
Tesla gets the praise he deserves. Have you ever seen an electrical engineer not fanboy over Tesla? Stop being silly. Einstein's results were just a lot more far-reaching than Tesla's. Get over it.
@AlexHutajulu6 жыл бұрын
please come back to led zeppelin
@adrianjezierski80935 жыл бұрын
Haha
@speccolo5 жыл бұрын
Ahahahahah
@안드러메가5 жыл бұрын
is this guy a scientific commercial clown?.Big Mouth
@MrStalyn5 жыл бұрын
Hahahahahahah
@rinad23455 жыл бұрын
listen to stair way to heaven backwards on youtube please
@nostalgia633 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Philochrony is the theory that describes the nature of time and demonstrates its existence. Time is magnitive: objective, Imperceptible and measurable.
@FaustoM74327 жыл бұрын
This video is outdate. A few months later, scientists re-checked their instruments, and discovered that there was a poorly connected optical fiber in a measuring instrument from the Italian laboratory. Einstein is saved :-P
@AzguardMike6 жыл бұрын
probably covering their tracks because noone wants to say "Einstein is wrong" Look at when Hawkins made a black hole theory, he had theories and data and they physics community just said "Yeah well Einsteins E=MC2 says it cant happen." But then this proved that his theory could be right and suddenly they claim "Instrument error"
@insuspectedrulling10826 жыл бұрын
Nope more and more scientist trying to prove Einstein wrong now
@SeventhSaucer6 жыл бұрын
Silent Gamer - That never happened.
@black_jack_meghav6 жыл бұрын
seventh saucer how do you know that?
@kzero14996 жыл бұрын
Not really. He concluded systematic errors, but he was explaining and giving examples of what was being claimed at the time as well.
@100101101101010 жыл бұрын
There was an electrical malfunction for the exact amount of time the neutrinos beat the light.
@a_yan65815 жыл бұрын
When you realized almost every time when you've already finished a test, but your teacher says to check your answers again. Springs back to life.
@Anonimowany14 жыл бұрын
He can explain things so well and clear. Im so amazed.
@alyasgrey937010 жыл бұрын
I hate any reference to "proving Einstein wrong". He was a brilliant man, but he wasn't perfect. The man was wrong about lots of things because his job required him to make new conjectures on a regular basis.
@archilzhvania62424 жыл бұрын
"If facts don't agree with theory, change the facts" @Einstein.
@philipcoffman43728 жыл бұрын
What a smart guy . One of the greatest minds of our time for sure ..
@Striker7758 жыл бұрын
tragic that one of the greatest minds of our time has watched that god awful superman movie
@HighHell998 жыл бұрын
+Striker775 😂😂😂😂
@patinho55898 жыл бұрын
+Striker775 it was a Classic in its day
@RichardShearer8 жыл бұрын
+Striker775 dude that was like mind blown at the time hahaah i use to watch it all the time as a kid
@overthetip8 жыл бұрын
One of the greatest minds of our space-time you mean!
@edwardbecker85462 жыл бұрын
Energy = (distance)(time) such that (E/d) = t where time is a measure of energy divided by distance. integral E dt = integral dt de such that d=1 where E=(1)t such that E = time when d=1unit where E>0 and t>0. The derivative of E=dt is DE=(d')(t)+d(t') and if d=1 then DE=DT. Therefore, Energy = time when distance equals 1 unit. So, there must be an equilibrium of distance in order for Energy=time. Possibly, this idea could contribute to the idea of relativity being caused by an equilibrium of distance depending on a certain center of mass.
@rhysbrown99478 жыл бұрын
This anomaly of the neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light was a mistake. The equipment used to get this measure was faulty. A fibre optic cable attached improperly and a clock oscillator ticking too fast. The problems were fixed and the results showed that neutrinos speeds are in fact consistent with that of light.
@mariofakova3675 жыл бұрын
What if michio kaku is wrong
@-Vitalis-5 жыл бұрын
What if reality is just an illusion of vanity and your thoughts aren't really yours?
@brand58875 жыл бұрын
@@-Vitalis- wtf. Im calling the fbi
@-Vitalis-5 жыл бұрын
@@brand5887 Aw, shit... not again.
@elliotts63355 жыл бұрын
it's not even his opinion or theory he's just reporting the facts lol
@ledzeppelin12125 жыл бұрын
Maybe we all just live in a simulation, says Elon Musk kzbin.info/www/bejne/aHyukJ6wp6-DiZo
@jasondotson8 жыл бұрын
Man, Jimmy Page should just get the mighty Zeppelin back together and bounce from this gig. Just sayin'. He can help the kids better that way. By rockin', I mean.
@vincelunceford8 жыл бұрын
LOL
@vishalj274 жыл бұрын
Neutrons are detected at the same time because neutrons are released from the source 3 hours before the explosion (When light is released). It's the short explanation, full explanation is enough complicated to explain here. Source: Cosmos TV series
@pythontron87104 жыл бұрын
neutrinos
@SaiyamVerma5 жыл бұрын
I used the relativity to destroy the relativity
@lly_094 жыл бұрын
Jenius*
@samlogistics33364 жыл бұрын
A positive person understands more negativity than the positivity
@lordmaster43064 жыл бұрын
A small price to pay for salvation
@usamalasharibaloch83654 жыл бұрын
How bro??? Plz tell me .. I'm already in confusion whether its true or not!
@usamalasharibaloch83654 жыл бұрын
@bruh what???
@Gold_Tail10 жыл бұрын
Just to say, he was right. it was actually just a GPS failure
@DarkAesthetics3310 жыл бұрын
Really? Got a link? I would like to learn about it.
@Gold_Tail10 жыл бұрын
One link is this one news.sciencemag.org/2012/02/breaking-news-error-undoes-faster-light-neutrino-results and if you want to really read up on it here's a wikipedia article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_neutrino_anomaly
@Rodrigo-bv7uv6 жыл бұрын
For the GPS of my phone I live 40 meters down the street.
@charleslyell37486 жыл бұрын
That's mapping data error, not GPS.
@Nova-pr5cw6 жыл бұрын
Lol
@s0ulshot6 жыл бұрын
Damn that liar Einstein!
@alanrogers80366 жыл бұрын
Rodrigo, i'd suggest you get out of your neighbors house before he gets home.
@firststreet47716 жыл бұрын
:-))
@rlrudedog9 ай бұрын
I enjoy listening when he explains anything.
@archiesutherland61275 жыл бұрын
I got excited when they said something went quicker than the speed of light but then was 😔
@NeverAsk5 жыл бұрын
Mr Hard Apple there is something, I sure you know that, however it’s a hypothetical particle
@eternaleffect24995 жыл бұрын
Quantum entanglement information travel faster than light
@MattStifler5 жыл бұрын
Boi you are at least 5000 years away in technology development before we will get close to speed of light
@donovana28615 жыл бұрын
@@MattStifler Maybe 500
@arnvgurung88535 жыл бұрын
H
@GururajBN4 жыл бұрын
Lovely talk. Physics with humour was unheard of so far!👌
@nithikeshrajan58614 жыл бұрын
Feynman says hi
@tokmol65495 жыл бұрын
Einstien theory is true based on what he said like: "the soup is hot" -Albert Einstien
@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time2 жыл бұрын
Albert Einstein said: "Everything is vibration" But if this is true if everything is just a form of energy vibration then there should be a process where new vibrations come into existence and other ceased to exist. Also this process should be able to explain why we all have a future that is always uncertain and interactive relative to our actions with a past that is always unchangeable and only really existing as a memory in the mind of the individual. Such a process has to be a physical continuum that is unfolding at the smallest unit of vibration energy the light quanta of quantum mechanics. Therefore it is unfolding photon oscillation by photon oscillation forming a great dance of energy exchange with new photon oscillations continuously coming in to existence.
@cdgt15 жыл бұрын
Here are the corrected equations: E = mc^2 = hv/m = (hc/lambda)/ms = kTm^2s = Kgm^2/s^2. Energy is a hypothetical state and is compared to torque. The true state of a force is power. Force = Kgm/s^2,Energy = Kgm^2/s^2, Power = Kgm^2/s^3.The space for allowable transference of energy is described as Permittivity x Permeability x The maximum speed of light in vacuum squared, which equals 1 exactly and is dimensionless (A^2s^4/Kgm^3)(Kgm/A^2s^2)(m^2/s^2) = Unity.
@itreallybelikethatdoe8295 жыл бұрын
Wait wut
@meshram10404 жыл бұрын
I read your book "Parallel Worlds" a masterpiece
@yusurkassem41745 жыл бұрын
Well that explains why I failed my physics exam today...guess I’m just too smart, I always knew that it made no sense 😏
@BernhardSchornak4 жыл бұрын
["First, it means that time travel could become commonplace because as you approach the speed of light time slows down."] What really happens is: The device used to measure the passing of time underlies dilation effects, and its mass grows with growing speed. When the mass grows, the inertia grows, as well, slowing down the device's measurement - the device *seems* to run slower than a not moving device, but, in reality, it just *counts* passing time slower than its not moving counterpart. Time travel is a nice illusion, but assumes that one exact copy of our entire Universe exists for each yoctosecond that passed by since the beginning of time (if time has a beginning or an end...). Where should that infinite quantity of energy come from, and which cosmic force was capable to create copies of our Universe in yoctosecond intervals?
@kancelariaprawnamdp5 жыл бұрын
Tesla has right not Einstein.
@roberthelms17373 жыл бұрын
Tesla was right. Einstein was a fuzzy haired crackpot. Bending space-time, seriously?
@ThunderZephyr_8 жыл бұрын
einstein isnt right or wrong ..he is old what would einstein say if he had access to todays knowledge?
@user-is3yn7xr4c8 жыл бұрын
couldn't agree more
@pcdispatch8 жыл бұрын
If Einstein lived today he would not be known by many people. There are many people doing remarkable research nowadays, but who knows their names? Also we are not making much of a progress today. Not the progress compared to the progress scientists made when all was discovered a long time ago. This is why we are still referring to people like Einstein, Tesla, etc. We are still using their foundations. Only additions to those foundations are being made. If Einstein lived today he would not be groundbreaking.
@roadsector95278 жыл бұрын
the world has lot of problem with this theory
@ThunderZephyr_8 жыл бұрын
my name you are kinda missing the point
@zmoopi8 жыл бұрын
***** Although my questions was blocked (presumably by Thunder Zephyr) it was a trick question: "Would that knowledge include things we know now, like the photoelectric effect?" I'd say your reply reveals your inadequate research skills to the community. Yes, it was too deep for you?
@hoobs41404 жыл бұрын
That's why he called it "THEORY of Relativity"
@blvp21454 жыл бұрын
But, but, Theory's have been proven, right? Or have I been told a lie for my whole life?
@hoobs41404 жыл бұрын
@@blvp2145 some theories have been proven but some haven't been proven yet
@blvp21454 жыл бұрын
@@hoobs4140 I would agree.
@muffinnit4 жыл бұрын
It is a scientific theory not just a theory and scientific theory find evidences and proof until it will be taken while theory is more like an a opinion
@drizzly99364 жыл бұрын
The theories of relativity have been extensively proven over and over
@SIRMMA4 жыл бұрын
Michio Kaku: What if Einstein is wrong? Albert Einstein: Hold my mustache