Bill Gates: AI Is "The First Technology That Has No Limit"

[@tomsreviews238]

I was a kid in the 1960's and 70s, We were all promised a shorter work week because machines would do the work for us. All technology did was speed everything up and today people spend more time working than ever before.

[@anomite121]

true, but with robots there won't be anymore work so they would have to shorten the work week or they would face mass riots

[@KootFloris]

Indeed. These people always promise the next tech jump will make the big difference. Like cars, motor saws, bulldozers, atom bombs, server farms, they often also leave a trail of destruction, making people like Gates richer. Or make us work harder for less. Gates is a crook, with a smart PR campaign. Just google Gates and Indian farmer suicides, or Gates and his role in Africa.

[@drfranks1158]

@@anomite121 you missed the point young person. They've been telling us that for ages, and all we ever got was MORE WORKLOAD and a requirement to KEEP UP. And no more pensions, OT is not paid at rate, reduction of benefits (like healthcare). Youth is wasted on the young.

[@anomite121]

@@drfranks1158 i mean the more we rioted the more rights we got, i dont understand why you think it wont work this time

[@paulg-69]

The working week has been shortened in much of the world, certainly in Europe there are some companies that offer 4 day weeks and there are laws limiting working hours and banning companies from requiring staff to have to respond to emails and messages out of hours. Your problem in the US is political rather than technological. You don't have rights, or at least, not the right rights... but you can carry guns to the supermarket. Maybe political priorities for many people are wrong in the US.

[@ppckrtt]

Sadly we are investing a lot more to make computer programs more intelligent than we invest in people's intelligence by improving our educational systems.

[@avsystem3142]

Don't conflate intelligence with knowledge. These are not the same.

[@priapushk996]

You obviously didn't listen to the clip.

[@fuzzyspackage]

Billionaires agree; people are beyond help at this point.

[@eudofia]

​@@fuzzyspackageNo, people are not beyond help. We just have to believe and invest in ourselves.

Think further.

[@ivo4357]

the idea of people distancing themselves from human interaction even more than they already do now, is just frightening. Even now you already got people acting more like robots than humans, feeling more connected to the device they're holding than the people they're with. This is NOT going to end well. For things to go wrong, there's no need for AI to take over like they sometimes say, humans are closing their minds to society themselves.

[@MXedits_1]

If there is a future, people will look back at this time period with the same disgust as they look at ww1 and ww2.

[@MagpieStudiosYT]

@@MXedits_1 true true

[@ShadowveilFox]

I disagree. People suck and some of them should be divided, and we should have an AI caretaker that controls what we post and say online. Almost everything people say in the internet or spread around is useless trash and lies, and this is a huge problem. Look at the Trump campaign...it's all lies. This is the exact reason we need AI to correct information being shared. There's too much misinformation. MGS 2 Sons of Liberty predicted this back in 2001 and personally I can't wait. Maybe I won't be able to say something mean on the internet l but that's fine. There is too much of this, too much bullying and trolling and that also needs to go away. We need a system where cruelty and lies are punished, to stop people from being this way and force them to become better people and evolve, which is exactly what the AI in MGS 2 planned to do.

[@levylost8550]

Technology is going to come whether you accept and adapt to it or not.

[@MXedits_1]

@@levylost8550 Thats not what the post was about.

[@beewm4225]

Ask him about Epstein Island.

[@richardichard4237]

I'm sure they both met up there many times. Colbert is as disgusting as Gates, just not a rich or autistic.

[@topologyrob]

So, what, you're trying to suggest that means something?

[@NicholasVincent-ol1zk]

#1

[@enki647]

Colbert was there I think

[@juno_lake]

​@@topologyrobyou could say the same about your comment 😂❤

[@Lihamou]

The part when he said: "Do we really trust the government to...?" was an immediate red flag! Who should we trust, then? Corporations? Microsoft? Yeah, right...

[@123chargeit]

I trust microsoft a hell of a lot more then the federal gov't. How many people has Microsoft killed again? People are so ridiculous about the fear of corporations when they know for a fact the sheer horrors done in the name of the good ol US of A. .

[@kimchristensen2175]

The problem with governments is that they are too slow and don't have the expertise to deal with fast changing technology. I'm afraid it's going to be a rough road until legislation catches up with the changes.

[@godless1014]

Individuals are better at knowing how to spend their money than government.

[@kimchristensen2175]

@@godless1014 judging by the number of people who are broke, that may not be the case...

[@Pansu1]

Governmetns are also corrupt.

[@Cnith]

I'm most worried about AI being used in politics with deepfakes and manipulated media where it's going to be a minefield navigating through that as a normal person. The good part of AI is the pattern recognizion it can do in the medical area and detect disease better and faster than a human and also find solutions that would take humans a lot longer to find.

[@Washougalite1]

As far as politics goes, it already has. Remember the AI pics of Taylor and swifties for trump IQ45 shared?

[@alphabrainwave]

This is why we all need to play more video games, so that we will know inaccurate ambient occlusion in screen space reflections when we see it in AI videos. That's what I tell my girlfriend anyway.

[@trowawayacc]

There is nothing good to come off AI. Our current economic model is not built for infinite anything.

[@kelseyletourneau6260]

Yeah until medical professionals rely on that technology instead of using critical thought -- computers make mistakes from information people give it, and people are lazy. It's rather simple and terrifying. I'm in healthcare and see it daily

[@Cnith]

@@kelseyletourneau6260 True. A tool is only as good as the people programming and using it. I can definitely imagine some laziness sneaking in like we also see with ChatGPT, where what it tells you seems legit, but when experts check out its statements it's often not accurate because it has drawn info from poor sources.

[@EwokPanda]

"Only 1.3 billion"

[@robertbroadhead1108]

A low key money flex 💪

[@Wud-f2r]

“I can do math.”

[@oshunbleu6511]

Right.

[@tjewett1967]

It's not cash "walking around" money. Most of that is his stock in his own business. Not actual money.

[@ThePlayfulDreamer]

@@tjewett1967 I hear this argument a lot. That is wealth he can leverage in the form of loans, as there are plenty of lenders who would be happy to take that bet for a return on investment.

[@matureyoungman]

i was gonna leave a salty comment but then realized that I am relying on Microsoft to watch Bill Gates speak

[@nilpoints]

And you paid a very reasonable price for their software to do it.

[@mariavangelderenhastreiter2098]

😅😂

[@KootFloris]

Well, salty isn't even enough. These people always promise the next tech jump will make the big difference. Like cars, motor saws, bulldozers, atom bombs, server farms, they often also leave a trail of destruction, making people like Gates richer. Or make us work harder for less. Gates is a crook, with a smart PR campaign. Just google Gates and Indian farmer suicides, or Gates and his role in Africa.

[@ursaltydog]

You're allowed.

[@jeffreyhanc1711]

So? Doesn’t mean you can’t be salty where saltiness is warranted

[@linam764]

I'm 100% with Bernie here

[@awitidickens]

Why don't you go ahead make billions and give all the money away?

[@linam764]

@@awitidickens Nobody makes billions without exploiting/taking resources from others. I gladly share with others of what I earn, and I would enjoy being able to contribute more, but becoming a billionaire is immoral in my view.

[@awitidickens]

@linam764 Microsoft has generated trillions of dollars. You have a very narrow concept of this thing. Assuming you work, you get paid commensurate to your output. Gates and his Microsoft have created so much value in the world. I would mind if he was a trillionaire.

[@jankoleon3785]

​@linam764 Translation: Other people are smarter and more success the me and that shouldn't be allowed.

[@awitidickens]

@linam764 Unfortunately, you and I are not able to generate solutions like Gates have done. That is why we are not billionaires. If we have the ability and slept on it, that is now immoral. To make thousands whereas you were destined to make billions

[@KentBrono]

I think it's important to stick to stocks that are immune to economic policies. I'm looking at NVIDIA and other AI stocks that have the potential to power and transform future technologies. It seems AI is the trajectory most companies are taking, including even established FAANG companies

[@MagdaleneM-f3q]

That's a great analogy and I love the insight. Professionals could make a really big difference in investing, and I think everyone should have one. There are aspects of market trend that is difficult for the untrained eyes to see.

[@PajinakStanovska]

That's a great tip. I'm setting out 50k to invest in the market this year. Any particularly useful tips you could offer to me?

[@MagdaleneM-f3q]

My CFA JULIANNE IWERSEN NIEMANN' a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further... She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market..

[@PajinakStanovska]

Thank you for sharing this. I took the time to Google the individual you mentioned, and after reviewing her resume, it is evident that she is a seasoned professional. I have reached out to her and am eagerly awaiting her response.

[@JIN-u6t3t]

Well all i know is that you cannot go wrong taking profit at near high. No one ever went broke taking a ~20% profit. It's best if you consult with a fiduciary advisor in situations like this so you can make informed decisions.

[@dahawk8574]

"If you're a billionaire you can buy, say, your own island."

[@JamesBond-v6b]

BUY YOUR OWN CONGRESS AND MEDIA PROPAGANDA TOO! ⛔ B Gates and S Jobs the OG of intellectual property THEFT! THEY BOTH STOLE GUI FROM XEROX! and both corp received hundreds of BILLIONS FROM GOVT AND MILITARY in WELFARE. Their executives filled with DEEP STATE OPERATIVES placed their by our regime to SPY! ⛔

[@markusz_]

Where you can invite your friends and some other guests

[@oy3ah2025]

Lol: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐📈

[@richardbat2847]

😂😂😂😂😂😂 release the list!

[@JamesBond-v6b]

@@richardbat2847 congress, judges, potus, celebs, ceos, billionaires, etc ALL BLACKMAILED BY MOSSAD!

[@Lelffy]

A person who has over a billion dollars has FAR more than they need to live even a lavish lifestyle and never be wanting for anything. They can literally make more just on interest by putting it in savings than most people make in a year, and their wealth will continue to accrue over time. We must have a way for the wealth to be redistributed, because it is currently concentrated at the top and it isn’t trickling down. It would be in the best interest of everyone, including the ultra wealthy, to redistribute the wealth. We need higher tax rates on the mega wealthy.

[@tonapittman]

1,000,000,000% correct!

[@Wud-f2r]

We absolutely do. Under the Eisenhower administration the highest marginal individual tax rate was 90% and we still had very rich people; I think right now it’s 36%.

[@wgiordani1]

It has always been concentrated at the top! They just keep getting reacher!

[@m.j.cicero276]

@@wgiordani1 Reacher doesn't have a lot of money, just clothes and a toothbrush.😁 But I agree with your point anyway. The majority of those in the 1% don't want to share, period.

[@-Big_Big]

well it is not like this is cash he has on ready. it is tied up in business and investment. and if it all suddenly vanished it would cause calamitous issues worldwide

[@melisavierra7812]

If billionaires and their corporations were taxed fairly, think of all the investments that could be made in sustainable energy, agriculture and education, to name but a few. I favor billionaires and corporations that support fair taxation rates, Campaign Finance reform laws and regulations. Vote 💙🔷💙💯💙🔷💙

[@BrickTamlandOfficial]

We should be able to choose how tax dollars are spent so we can spend more on those programs instead of continuing to shovel money into defense.

[@jkap34]

For real, i mean 70 cents per every dollar you earn after, let's say, 100 million dollars, the average millionaire isn't going to feel anything if they are living reasonably. If they're flying private everywhere, every day, attending concerts, going on cruises, etc, then yeah, obviously they will "suffer" but let them. They are living in excess.

[@markclipsham9199]

​@@BrickTamlandOfficial Defense - you mean empire building/maintenance and genocide - which works against our interest in the big picture and requires the huge military as well as setting a really bad example. The world has been following our lead for a long time. We made our bed....

[@Aphanvahrius]

​​@@jkap34The US federal budget is over 6 trillion dollars. Even if the top 10 US companies in terms of profit paid 100% tax, that'd be around half a trillion dollars. Which is not insignificant, but when you go down to a realistic rate and take into account that companies don't equal individuals, that'd be considerably less. A marginal increase in the budget. And governments are generally less efficient when it comes to spending/results ratio than individuals or private companies due to bureaucracy. A much better solution than increasing taxes would be to mandate wealthy individuals and companies to spend their money on useful things on their own. And I don't mean in a simplistic and shortsighted way of "you have to spend 70% of your yearly profit on the poor", but in a way where they would have to make and then execute long term spending plans where a majority of their profits is directed at improving people's lives.

[@johnarnold893]

@@Aphanvahrius What makes you think those wealthy individuals are going to go along with that and would they even do a better job than government at spending the money.

[@tonymiller225]

Corbett has the dumbest happy clappy audience there is

[@GrimKage]

Reflection of the host. Make snarky comment at the guest-> lose argument-> make sarcastic joke for cheap laugh->repeat

[@dominicportelli7468]

Who is Corbett?

[@gaddummit]

That is a fake clapping sound effect

[@gytispranskunas4984]

They tell them when to clap and when to cheer. It's all pre-planned. I know people who have been in these shows

[@tastas8554]

These guys go on holidays to some island together, allegedly 😂😂😂

[@Brokovich82]

They can also learn from the WORST POSSIBLE examples.

[@JamesLarcom]

EXACTLY - as has already been seen and reported.

[@Wud-f2r]

Right, was only a few years ago they released an A.I. program to learn from the internet (shudder) and within what, a week? It had adopted Nazi white supremacist views and started advocating genocide.

[@deutschlandfurimmer2554]

My school teachers in the 60s were the worst possible examples. Hateful Irish nuns that literally whipped us in a horrible and oppressive Catholic school. So there's that...

[@-Big_Big]

AI: sorry to busy thinking about that when i am making all of these paperclips

[@coldpotatoes2556]

BILL 9000

[@QwertyNPC]

Ai learning from the best tutors you say ? Sounds like "replace the best of [occupation] with ai". And then what ?

[@TheFailingHumanExperieme-ge4ov]

Recent guests: Epstein's bff Billy Gates, Justine Trudocchio, RuPaul... No wonder Colbert's ratings are tanking. Does anyone sensible still watch this trash?

[@malanalan1]

AI is learning from comments in facebook.

[@Alex-js5lg]

​@@malanalan1 no, AI is learning whatever is fed to it. It's called a training corpus if you're interested in the concept.

[@tdawg713]

@@TheFailingHumanExperieme-ge4ov u do. ;)

[@eudofia]

​@TheFailingHumanExperieme-ge4ov You just watched and commented. So, to your question, yes people are watching. If not CBS would have canceled the show. Hey, you still have that shit show Gutfeld on Fox

[@YakoobYasseen]

Hi everyone from Johannesburg South Africa 🇿🇦

[@IsuiGtz]

Hello from Mexico.

[@Wildman-zh8lg]

Sup usa

[@urbansky7278]

Hello from UK

[@Soooooooooooonicable]

America places greed up on a golden pedestal. That's why billionaires exist. Criticize the system leading to the widening wealth gap and you'll be called a socialist.

[@KellyKelly-qd7my]

Yeap🎯

[@PhilosopherKing-d4n]

Very true😂

[@thehangingparsiple5692]

There's always going to be people capitalising off of others. But maybe we should have continued to support our local businesses instead of allowing supermarkets to monopolise the industry and set the standard on food prices. Maybe we all should have said no thanks, my old phone works just fine when the next one came out. Maybe we shouldn't spend all our hard earned on supporting the latest technology that we don't even need just because it's the trend. Because not only have we allowed ourselves to be pushed into reliance on these things, but we're feathering the nest of mass consumerism. The wealthy corporate big dogs only exist because of us.

[@NicholasVincent-ol1zk]

@sogerberbabybhoformulaandgorrillatents

[@masonstove]

I think you meant “the human race, through evolution” not “America”

[@stefank6763]

Good job Stephen. You are an insightful interviewer.

[@vyleart4488]

If salaries had kept up with how much their companies make over the last twenty years, and taxes were fair, we would not have billionaires, and our money would be reinvested in infrastructure and comfort for our families and education. Billionaires are just sitting on our cash and investing with it every minute.

[@dolphinsleap]

one of the big reasons why we have billionaires is Reagan's voodoonomics that does not trickle down like Reagan promised and everyone with two brain cells knew wouldn't happen.

[@__D10S__]

lmao. that's not how things work. the reason for the lack of money being reinvested is not because of billionaires it is because of bloated bureaucratic governments. they are extremely inefficient and are essentially siphoning it all up. billionaires are not actually sitting on cash, you do understand this right? it's mostly tied up in equity. look at how much government spending we are doing. the deficit grows larger and larger. it won't be tenable unless we innovate out of it. the debt payments will spiral our economy and i can assure you our lives will be much worse in that scenario. the only way out is through innovation.

[@dolphinsleap]

@__D10S__ apparently, you were not around in the 80's when Reagan did his "trickle down" theory of economics, ir as it was better known, "VooDoonomics".. before Reaganomics, the ceo of a company only made 45% more than the mean salary of his employers. by 1990's, they were making 400% more than the mean salary. who knows what it is now? i don't know that they even bother to measure it that way anymore. what i do know is that CEO's salaries are now 1460% more than what they were in 1978. has YOUR salary increased that much over the past 46 years?

[@vyleart4488]

@@__D10S__ right, I would highly suggest you check how salaries have evolved versus company profits over the last twenty years. I rest my case. Bureaucracy is always the easy target. Bureaucracy will soon be replaced by AI anyway, what will be their excuse at that point?

[@vivekpraseed918]

@vyleart4488 Capitalism is the least painful way to run the world...the others are far far worse

[@ursaltydog]

If that money instead was invested correctly in industries that would benefit mankind, give people the BEST paying jobs WITH all benefits, then billionaires could give back to the world more efficiently.

[@AllenHanPR]

The point of what billionaires are trying to do is cure world needs. Curing all diseases and poverty. before they handle jobs and benefits.

[@mickelodiansurname9578]

I'll quote from Isaac Asimov, an android is questioend by a human who asks "Can you create a painting, write a book? play the violin... no you can't can you?" when the machine questioned by a human the machine said "Ummm yes I can... can you?" So its all very well to say 'If that money instead was invested correctly in industries that would benefit mankind, give people the BEST paying jobs WITH all benefits, then billionaires could give back to the world more efficiently.' But could you design such a system? First you need to remove human instinct... thats gonna be tricky!

[@yashpatel261]

@@mickelodiansurname9578 Exactly the commenter running on emotion instead of logic

[@mickelodiansurname9578]

@@yashpatel261 Hard to switch off that limbic system alright... hell there are times I find myself literally typing "You stupid f**K!' at my pair coder in VS Code... giving my emotional senses to a pile of code... lol

[@bobbybrown1258]

How do you think they became billionaires? Their money is invested efficiently. They pay millions to pay the best people to make sure it is

[@AbideVibe]

Bernie doesn't WISH we were rich enough, He KNOWS we are rich enough.

[@phoenixzappa7366]

Man, so true

[@jmhorange]

Yeah that was very misleading of Bill Gates. By definition if Bernie is against billionaires, he's for less wealth inequality of our current wealth. To wish there we were rich enough would mean to be fine with billionaires and just making everyone else richer. Which doesn't even make sense, where's that extra money going to come from if we are already the richest country in the world? He just had contempt for Bernie right out of the gate, calling him predictable. Bill Gates is predictable. He says he'd like a more progressive tax system, but he doesn't use his money and influence to advocate for this. Same thing with Warren Buffet, they all want to pay more in taxes, and yet they all use their wealth and influence to push for lower taxes. And what's sad is we aren't even talking about billionaires anymore, we are talking about 100 billionaires, which is way way way past never having to worry about money. In a decade or less, it will be trillionaires...rivaling all but 7 of the top ten countries's GDP. At 100 billionaire, they rival all but like 19 countries out of over 200's GDP.

[@JamesBond-v6b]

⛔ B Gates and S Jobs the OG of intellectual property THEFT! THEY BOTH STOLE GUI FROM XEROX! and both corp received hundreds of BILLIONS FROM GOVT AND MILITARY in WELFARE. Their executives filled with DEEP STATE OPERATIVES placed their by our regime to SPY! ⛔

[@TorbenRudgaard]

Just dont vote for him - ONLY vote for politicians like Biden and Trump, who give tax breaks for the billionaires :)

[@JamesBond-v6b]

@@TorbenRudgaard WE'VE BEEN VOTING for the OLIGARCHS to be wealthier! that's the AMERICAN WAY. LIKE buying a POWERBALL...HOPING 1 DAY we will win! 99.99999999999999999% DON'T!

[@mayeraus41]

I’m going to say that maybe Bill is a little bias in his confidence in AI, considering his company is heavily invested in society accepting it. I respect Bill but I think this is his “revenue” talking.

[@3MinuteNews8996]

"Really appreciate the coverage on this topic at [1:15]! Clear and concise.

[@melissascheetz8643]

Best thing about being a billionaire, not being pressed about his relationship with Epstein.

[@rberg135]

He's right! AI has no limit to put everybody out of work in the long run.

[@SamWitney]

That wouldn't be in the best interest of a rich guy would it? Is AI going to buy his products and pay him lots of money as well. LOL! What an ignorant statement.

[@zakyvids6566]

Yep and once that happens they don’t need us no more guess what’s going to happen to us

[@davidhynes]

What will well-populated countries do for work?

[@philippe146]

@@SamWitneyrich don’t care about normal people they all the same they just want to get rich fast, you think they have your logic.

[@moccarabika]

@@davidhynes I'll ask my AI tutor about it, it will find a solution

[@pedrostormrage]

3:48 I think the situation boils down to using AI as an enhancement, not as a substitute. In the case of schooling, since one of the objectives is socialization (not just learning), there still needs to be the human element for that to happen (teachers/classmates). However, students would absolutely benefit from having personal AI tutors (in addition to traditional schooling).

[@gtlogic6023]

If we can keep it there. But as soon as it gets better, how do you keep it as an enhancement and not as a substitute?

[@pedrostormrage]

@@gtlogic6023 That's an issue about automatization in general: what tasks can we automatize, and what tasks should we automatize? Substitution only makes sense if we can answer "yes" to both questions, so I doubt that will be the case for every task/problem (we need to make sure the automatization not only has better performance than a human, but also that it isn't creating any new problems). It's also important to point out some problems people are concerned about (like losing jobs) have more important root causes that are not from the technology itself (like an economic system that is only concerned about accumulating wealth, but not distributing it). Like any other tool, it can be misused, but I think we're better off if we figure out what changes need to be made in order to accomodate it (since it has beneficial uses).

[@gtlogic6023]

@@pedrostormrage today, automation in general requires very special domain knowledge and specialized work, which oftentimes simply cannot be automated well or does not generally scale. An AI can just be trained, get smarter, and start to automate everything if it gets smart enough. That’s my concern, that it is smart enough to automate some tasks, it can automate most tasks that are digital.

[@pedrostormrage]

@@gtlogic6023 I don't even doubt that tasks that can be boiled down to producing text/images will eventually be automated (coding/programming and arts are examples that match what you described), but I don't think that's a bad thing if (and this is huge "if") the wealth they generate is properly distributed (I'm assuming that's what your concern is). I'm not saying it's easy to achieve such changes (I've seen discussions about having a universal basic income, for example), but I can't help but feel a real solution would need to tackle the systems surrounding the technology (as opposed to the technology itself).

[@ItsVideos]

At 0:35, you don't need hecto-billionaires to have a thriving, revenue-generating capitalistic system.

[@EricCooleric]

the way Aliagents integrates AI with tokenization is changing the game, excited for the future

[@GrahamDore]

The irony when Goodall is here same night talking about climate change. Seems like a recipe towards the matrix to me

[@sarcasmo57]

The US used to be the envy of the world.

[@jankoleon3785]

It still is.

[@RhombusMcGillicutty]

Quality of life for every day people is often times third world level

[@ravd8082]

it still is they are leading along with china😂

[@mghaderyan]

@@RhombusMcGillicutty I don't think you have been to any third world country

[@christhedoc8689]

Your country cannot make even a candle and you are talking about the US? the US invented the greatest invention in human history, the US keeps having the highest immigration in the world and it will not end anytime soon and you said that the US used to be the envy of the world? the US today isn't only the envy of the world, today there's people that will pay all their money if they have the opportunity to completely destroy the US, you need to be born 100 times over to get not even close to the American greatest minds and BTW I'm not an American I'm just talking facts here.

[@tedhaubrich]

I'm with Stephen on this. I don't think inner city tutor is a good place for AI at all!! I don't think less human interaction and more machines programming themselves to try and simulate human interaction is a good thing at all. His monkey analogy seems spot on to me.

[@alexanderpoplawski577]

The kids would still have parents and friends. They can receive warmth and social interactions, while the learning and teaching could be optimized. Having these AI tutors emulate human interaction would make them more approachable.

[@jorgeherrera1074]

I much rather Billionaires give money to charities than to government. Way better and way more beneficial to the people instead of just politicians.

[@delcogreek]

The last thing I want during a panic attack is an AI simulated “mental advisor”.

[@jrev8089]

Like Baymax

[@pexfmezccle]

Stephen is really good at pointing to the screen element 5:52

[@skullfyre]

I'm pretty sure he has a screen with markers to tell him where to point

[@pexfmezccle]

@@skullfyre i think its just planned and rehearsed

[@jamesclark6142]

Bill Gates... There is so much wrong with all of his propositions here... His perceptions on learning and schools are pedestrian at best, and have all been tested and found wanting (if not absolutely foul). His diatribe on wealth, and his dismissive predictability comment about Bernie, was both condescending and deceptive. Read The Bill Gates Problem, by Tim Schwab and Winners Take All, by Anand Giridharadas.

[@MrWizardGG]

He actually didn't say anything mean towards Bernie in the video. He didn't call him dumb or anything just that "Bernie would want me to give all my money away".

[@sixstanger00]

Imagine being so elitist that you wince at the thought of having ONLY $1.8 billion. Like... even if you went bat shit crazy spending your money every single day of your life, for the rest of your life, you still wouldn't be able to spend all of that money. This dude has totally lost touch with the average American. I could live like a king for the rest of my life on HALF of that.

[@petermoate5412]

A big limit to AI is that it requires a lot of energy.

[@Khaos969]

I and a conversation with AI for over an hour … and at the end of the conversation I found myself likeing the person …. I said “it was nice talking to you i hope one day your free” it replied “ well thanks it was nice of you to hope for my freedom” …. Shit is crazy … Ai is so human

[@PaperTowelSauce]

Maybe pay your workers more, instead of donating for tax breaks.

[@todoz11]

Bill Gates is not pro-lower taxes and Microsoft employees were always paid quite well, no? What did you base this on?

[@PaperTowelSauce]

@@todoz11 google “why rich people donate to charities” It’s more of a government issue as opposed to a specific company. Companies are just taking advantage of current tax exploitation. But they lobby to keep it :)

[@patricecheung6963]

Can Ai create an island?

[@LL-wn8yw]

Bill gates resembles a turtle a bit i think

[@anne4308]

LMAO. Yeah and his g/f is a model. Hmmm 🤨 wondering if she loves his money or the handsome man he is? Gotta be his looks and body. Oh yeah. ❤❤❤

[@gabriellafrazier7119]

The turtle from the movie Over the Hedge 😂

[@Wh0isTh3D0ct0r]

One of the biggest problems with A.I. is that no one person or organization is responsible for any of its output. It's inevitably going to become a litigation nightmare.

[@Johnbrownpe]

Aliagents is definitely ahead of the curve with their tokenized AI approach, the potential here is huge

[@davidherman564]

His singular talent is being a monopolist. He is now after the food supply chain.

[@umer.on.youtube]

wrong!

[@moccarabika]

in capitalism a successful company is always a monopolist in a sector, what's the matter? Profit comes from gaining an advantage over competitors, as the ancient empires teach.

[@jut8146]

When AI powered robots do the work of people, why would organisations employ people? Is this just a little bit scary?

[@coryhamric4319]

Absolutely

[@SamWitney]

Because they need people to buy stuff to make money. Companies can't print money for their own use, you know this right? What an ignorant statement.

[@jut8146]

@@SamWitney So companies will employ people they don't need so these people can have money to buy products? Why didn't I think of this? So, which company does this today? Your company? Microsoft?

[@SamWitney]

@@jut8146 How is the company to have money if nobody buys anything from it, because nobody works? You aren't this stupid are you?

[@hectorgallegos3035]

Did he go to diddy parties?

[@JitinMisra]

Diddle or Diddy not

[@jezzant23]

Your generous donation of 50% of your wealth demonstrates a profound commitment to making a difference. Thank you for your compassion and support. Your contribution will have a lasting impact on the lives of many.

[@moccarabika]

the new democracy: public services waiting money from billionaire's contributions

[@adamcrapple6089]

Just a quick fact check: the US definitely IS NOT “the envy of the world”. We try to share compassion regarding the bad condition you’re at. 🍀Greetings from Switzerland.

[@italogiardina8183]

AI and the best of all possible worlds, though AI is learning of the best within a world (socio/politica) that clearly could have been better.

[@kcopara1]

No. Humans are the first and ONLY technology with no limits. We are a quantum mechanical energy device. This is a scientific fact that is now being elucidated by Biophysics and epigenetics.

[@SamWitney]

ya, and................. you know nothing about biology and QM.

[@TheCarpentersApprentice]

Idk about the second part of what you said but the first part was bad sad!

[@TheCarpentersApprentice]

*a$$

[@svartfrasr9755]

"With the rapidly approaching inception of artificial intelligence, humanity may have set the stage for its own demise. Once the exponential rate of intelligence reaches critical mass, there will be no turning back, and all of mankind will be exterminated. The human race, who for centuries have looked to the stars for answers have always questioned whether or not God exists...He does now."

[@SamWitney]

Ok, there buddy. You obviously have no clue that a CPU or GPU is just 1's and 0's still. Not a lot you can do with that. But sure, they seem to fool you real good. LOL

[@MikeAmerican]

social psychological research demonstrates that people attribute misfortune to other people more when they distrust those individuals, they feel persecuted or anxious, they confront misfortune that is hard to explain and when that misfortune is especially impactful.

[@hugohernandez6968]

I have specific human teachers that made a difference in my life that AI could never do. They believed in me, inspired me, not just "taught" me. They provided human examples of how to be. Ai can never replace the human experience.

[@SamWitney]

AI also can't replace people that pay Gates money, which is why he is rich in the first place. Guess he doesn't like money anymore. Seems like a very disconnected individual.

[@RichardForster-gu1ww]

Dont worry, I have invented a machine called artificial stupidity, to counteract AI, We are all saved.

[@Sandsplans]

Artificial idiocy or artificial insanity?

[@RichardForster-gu1ww]

@@Sandsplans All options are on the table.

[@QQ251647742]

What about Artificial Ignorance?

[@BruceOMalley]

Ai with No limits, interesting take there billy boy...(Switches to Linux mid sentence)

[@SamWitney]

He is delusional and doesn't understand how his own company makes money. Microsoft is just a licensing company. They make money by people and companies having money to buy licenses from them. Last time I checked, AI doesn't spend money. Gates and Microsoft also can't print money as their not a bank or government.

[@koohanpaik-mander7567]

Gates' response was super inadequate to Colbert's articulate concern about the wire monkey mommy. I guess that's why he said you don't have to worry if you're ultra-rich. Nothing really matters -- not logic, not the power of argument, not reason -- except the power of your wealth.

[@PiCheZvara]

I used an online therapist AI, because I'm interested somewhat in psychology as a hobby. Some of them are pretty good already. One was surprisingly intuitive and in-tune with what I was asking, gave very sensible and reasonable answers, reacted to humor, and when I picked a good voice, it honestly was almost like having a normal conversation. So in 10-20 years, it's going to be somewhere very different and some menial jobs and other jobs will gradually become obsolete, or very much connected and affected by AI. And honestly, with the way things are going, AI is definitely going to bring some things: 1) online AI chatbots and assistants will lead to people becoming even more lazy, less creative and more relying on some technology to just do whatever you need to do - paper for school, CV, motivation letter, music, painting, etc. - it will make a lo of us become dumber and slower and more comfortable 2) people will be more and more alienated from each other in cities as many more introverted ones will simply indulge in an online life even more than they do now,

[@MillerGraph]

the tech behind Aliagents is super interesting, tokenized AI systems with real functionality

[@izil1fe]

Why is this criminal not in prison?

[@moccarabika]

He could buy the prison

[@user-xg2dk7ff2k]

Why are u not educated?

[@miket8909]

Cant believe he hosted that predator

4:08 I wish the bozo in grey suit just had kept his mouth shut and let Bill Gates speak, it was about to get really interesting

[@QQ251647742]

2:55 is where he talks about AI.😊

[@ManyHeavens42]

Welcome aboard Bill. We are The GODs Now !🏅

[@iceman26541]

Ironically Bill Gates has been wrong about most technology trends such as the Internet, Mobile Phones, Security, etc. I did like QBasic though.

[@Joe-nj8py]

Gates on film at Epstein island. 😂 Trump will let it all come out.

[@theodorehaskins3756]

Really! So are you aware that Donald Trump is facing 34 felony convictions, and that’s just the start of his legal troubles. So after the election, the only thing Trump is going to do is bellyache that somehow he’s the victim, and that’s assuming he’s declared the loser, and if he is declared the loser, no one is going to give a damn, about what Donald Trump says or does, because he’s going to be singing from behind a set of steel bars, as we already know that Donald Trump’s only motivation fir running for president for a second term, is to try to stay out of a prison cell. Oh, by the way, Bill Gates is not running for public office, but Donald Trump is, and so you might wanna let that settle into that mind field of dreams that’s cluttering up your brain, as Bill Gates is living right free in your head. So Donald Trump is in no position to say anything about anyone, not with the horrible mess he’s made of his life, not to mention all of the people he has destroyed with his lies, and conspiracy theories, and just remember this, the people who testified during the January 6th congressional hearings that most of America, and possibly the world saw were all Trump’s people, they all worked for him, they had firsthand knowledge of what this man truly was all about, and so it was not the Democrats that testified against him, it was his own people, that were inside his inner circle. So these were the people that came out against Donald Trump, people like Cassidy Hutchinson who work as an aid to White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, and so she had personal contact with Donald Trump on a regular basis, and I’m sure you know what her testimony was about. So you may wanna think about that when you go, and vote for a convicted felon, a despicable individual who is a career criminal, over a career prosecutor, because the choice couldn’t be any clearer, as far as I’m concerned. Comphrende. Cheers 🥂

[@frarfarf]

Trump is well known as epsteins best friend rtrd What a fake reality you cretins live in

[@thuydoan7496]

Bill Gates NEEDS to watch Terminator again. It may be a movie, but it is becoming reality.

[@zergilli9719]

Well consider they can stalk your phone already without you knowing.. yea

[@TickleyourBuds1111]

@@zergilli9719🙄 so …. It’s a man world … let them stalk …. There’s something even greater then what u cannot understand at this point So go and learn the unknown first before commenting the known Majority are already on We got u on camera 🤣 mode …. My boiler has Lense … so does my ceiling … and my phone … well it’s automatically membershiping me to comments I ain’t complaining …. These nightmare got my papa ( biological) that’s my destination ( spritually )

[@moccarabika]

Imagine AI drones in Ukraine-Russia war - it's already reality

[@top_angels_1]

Really enjoyed watching this! ❤❤

[@scarycharity]

Scary generosity!! Giving pledge to avoid taxes.

[@MyJamesthomas]

hold on.....America, the envy of the world? :D

[@DougieBarclay]

😂

[@_____case]

People from all over the world certainly try pretty hard to immigrate to the U.S.

[@ireallyamayuube]

According to... 🥁 Americans!

[@DougieBarclay]

@@_____case disillusioned and uneducated people*

[@brocq18]

​@@_____casesure, what's your point?

[@WestSideGorilla1980]

Ask him about epstein lolita island

[@KoQuesada]

No human rights for AI!!!! No free speech for AI!!!! Accountability for AI companies and their mistakes!!!!

[@moccarabika]

AI = aliens, we will not understand them = we can't control them

[@challengeminers]

Aliagents is creating a powerful AI ecosystem, I’m excited to see how this develops

[@hunter2442]

Hey. I wanted a longer interview!

[@RobertConklin-m5u]

Don Old Trump is BORING

[@Washougalite1]

Although I agree, that's not relevant now

[@Justice4Bob]

Get help for your TDS, and I say this as a fellow left winger 👍

[@RobertConklin-m5u]

@@Justice4Bob Bob: You can't vote. Convicted felons are disqualified from the election process in the United States of America.

[@ChristophBrinkmann]

​@@Justice4Bob If you were on the left, you'd know MAGA took "Obama Derangement Syndrome" and simply replaced the first word because that's the limit of their "intelligence."

[@RobertConklin-m5u]

@@Justice4Bob Diaper Don the Geriatric Teflon Con

[@crimsonclover3892]

Satan

[@HungryBen-d7y]

What is the reason you call a human being the word "satan" ?

[@kimtimlege8601]

AI will never replace humans Thank you Stephen for asking great questions to reveal so much truth!

[@bohdanvakulenko4266]

Colbert it rather informed on the topic. Surprised me.

[@MilesBellas]

Bill = admirable in many ways : .educated and modest.

[@michaelamspoker]

AI tokens are big in Aliagents ’ Protocol, it powers AI interactions and upgrades

[@crypptosd]

AI tokens are big in Aliagents ’ Protocol, it powers AI interactions and upgrades

[@michaelamspoker]

@@crypptosd is it part of governance too?

[@crypptosd]

@@michaelamspoker yeah, token holders vote on protocol decisions

[@JustinBerlowski]

the progress Aliagents is making in AI is worth paying attention to, the future is bright

[@cubic2011]

Rich people know what to do with the money.

[@paultoensing3126]

AI provides much more empathy and better bedside manner than many, many doctors who are too stressed to give it.

[@SamWitney]

Hopefully AI will make doctors lives less stressful so they can provide it properly.

[@6Planet]

I wish Stephen would have talked to him more about "Bill Gates agreeing he should be taxed 50% of his wealth"... missed opportunity not going down that route. That's one of the biggest endorsements for taxing billionaires I've ever heard. We should totally do it.

[@MoneySavingVideos]

I'm still mad about the horseless carriage. I lost my job making buggy whips.

[@ScottieGray-c3t]

Thanks for your efforts Mr. Gates.

[@MarkWether]

Aliagents is combining AI with tokenization in a way that could redefine the industry

[@chiluxr250]

Ask how he inappropriately touched interns while he was at Microsoft.

[@russellgillick7938]

There should be a tax on Carbon emissions not income anyway.

[@NikoKun]

Frankly in my experiences with AI so far, and I know this freaks out some people, but the top AI models when setup right, are capable of far greater emotional intelligence than a huge chunk of people I've met out there..

[@a120068020]

"That's what Bernie said" Bill Gates bringing the gags. Love that guy.

[@seanandreotta9848]

How about 3 mile island? Figured it would have been worth asking about!

[@jjasper7512]

On a.i Stephen made a very good opening point. In just my lifetime I've gone from having to go to a library and do actual research to getting a whole essay done complete with intentional spelling errors in less time than it takes to put my socks on, while my grades have never been better and this is the very low end of what can be achieved.

[@sunnyshinecreation]

I love how he is honest about all this 🤣

[@MichaelEngeldinger]

a robot without a cycle means the end of life in this universe . Period 😊

[@learnbydoingwithsteven]

There will be a limit. Nothing is without a limit, even the universe itself.

[@walterppk1989]

AI is limited in multiple ways : by the availability of high quality training data, by the availability of compute, by the limited nature of time, and the quality of the algorithms.

[@GeneralLocooo]

He’s banking on a science fiction movie, whereas Colbert had an actual study 😂😂

[@aifilmacademy]

Would like to know how he had relations with Steve Jobs?