Black Holes and the Structure of Spacetime by Juan Maldacena

PUBLIC LECTURES
Black Holes and the Structure of Spacetime by Juan Maldacena
DATE: 25 May 2018, 16:00 to 18:00
VENUE: Chandrasekhar Auditorium, ICTS, Bangalore
Black holes are fascinating objects predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity. Though they were initially viewed as pathological and unphysical solutions, they were later understood to be a solid and generic outcome of the theory. They are objects where the distortion of space and time is so extreme that it defies imagination. Black holes give rise to paradoxes whose resolution requires us to modify our conception of spacetime. We will review how black holes went from being an apparently unphysical solutions to a central tool for discovering new perspectives on the nature of spacetime.
Table of Contents (powered by videoken.com)
0:00:00 PUBLIC LECTURE
0:09:43 Black Holes and the Structure of Spacetime
0:10:40 They are not black
0:11:26 Principle of Relativity
0:12:06 Special Relativity
0:12:31 Both measure the same speed of light
0:13:16 The twin paradox
0:15:44 Gravity
0:16:16 Einstein's happy thought:
0:16:57 Feels weightless
0:17:14 General Relativity
0:17:57 Gravity changes the flow of time
0:19:10 Karl Schwarzschild found the spacetime geometry outside a massive spherical body
0:21:26 They are not falling freely!
0:21:47 The geometry continues behind the horizon
0:23:54 Space-time as a river
0:25:49 1) Once you cross the horizon, you cannot get out!
0:26:13 Real black holes
0:26:39 How do we see them?
0:27:14 Many galaxies similar to ours have these black holes at the center.
0:27:59 Black hole collisions produce gravity waves
0:28:33 Interesting theoretical aspects
0:28:54 Interesting properties
0:30:30 Area law - The area of the horizon always increases.
0:31:25 We have discussed black holes according to Einstein's theory of general relativity,
0:31:51 White Black holes!
0:33:39 Why? Relativistic quantum mechanics
0:33:49 The vacuum
0:36:28 The life of a black hole
0:38:02 Theoretical problems with black hole temperature
0:38:46 Temperature
0:39:19 Heat and entropy (disorder)
0:40:36 What are the constituents of a black hole?
0:41:08 Information loss
0:42:36 We need a theory that puts together quantum mechanics and gravity
0:42:52 String theory
0:43:58 Holography
0:45:57 Black holes correspond to a large number of particles on the boundary
0:46:56 The theory on the boundary obeys the rules of quantum mechanics
0:47:28 Emergent geometry
0:47:55 If a man does not keep pace with his companions,
0:49:10 State of the quantum system.
0:50:04 What is a black hole in the spacetime
0:50:08 Back to the sentence
0:50:13 Make a couple of changes
0:51:14 More changes...
0:51:24 No words...
0:52:00 If the changes were produced by a reversible process, e.g. an encryption algorithm.
0:53:06 Laws of physics on the boundary change the state of the boundary theory.
0:54:02 Using holography to learn about strongly interacting theories:
0:55:14 Black holes as sources of information
0:56:09 Entanglement and geometry
0:56:51 Two sided Schwarzschild solution
0:58:43 Wormhole interpretation.
0:59:27 Not the typical science fiction wormhole
1:01:19 In the exact theory,
1:02:42 Analogy
1:03:51 A forbidden meeting
1:05:39 Black hole interior
1:06:36 Conclusions
1:07:14 The end
1:07:23 Q&A

[@nicolasarias2666]

Maldacena talking to regular scholars about the basis of quantum mechanics and general relativity is like a parent teaching how to add or divide to his kid. This is so simple for him that he adds pictures and animation like a high school power point presentation. He is just in another level of brightness

[@Mehlsack93]

quot regular scholars

[@2010sunshine]

It's highly laudable effort on the part of ICTS to have invited Juan Maldacena. No doubt that his lecture and interaction will motivate young Indian scientists.

[@philmarch171]

I believe one of the biggest indicators of intellect is the ability to explain complex things simply. Dr. Maldacena is of of the select few on the planet (even in history) that has this ability. He doesn't talk above people and doesn't get abstract to avoid tough questions. He's one of the brightest minds today and I feel lucky and grateful to be able to view videos like this.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Frank DiMeglio has surpassed Newton and Einstein.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Frank DiMeglio is the world authority on gravitation, BY FAR. Juan is deliberately and deceitfully evading and ignoring everything that Frank DiMeglio has proven in physics.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Wrong. Ask him about Frank DiMeglio.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

WHY the motion of the planets relative to the Sun NECESSARILY involves BALANCED GRAVITATIONAL/ELECTROMAGNETIC force/energy: Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This is proven by F=ma AND E=mc2. (This NECESSARILY involves what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE.) Therefore, GRAVITATIONAL force/energy is proportional to (or balanced with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ACCORDINGLY, a given planet sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THEREFORE, "mass"/energy involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL force/energy; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or balanced with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/energy; as this balances AND unifies ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity; as this balances gravity AND inertia. (This explains F=ma AND E=mc2, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy IS gravity.) ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/energy involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. It ALL makes perfect sense. This ALSO explains why objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course) in direct comparison with the SPEED OF LIGHT. SO, BALANCED attraction and repulsion is FUNDAMENTAL; AS GRAVITY IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY; AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This also explains WHY the force/energy (or "mass"/energy) is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE) in the case of the orbits of the planets relative to the Sun, as PERPETUAL MOTION is thereby explained as well. Great. SO, "mass"/energy involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL force/energy; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. IT IS PROVEN. Indeed, a PHOTON may be placed at the center of the Sun (as a POINT, of course); as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or balanced with) the speed of light. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. BY Frank DiMeglio

[@bipolarbear9917]

@@frankdimeglio8216 Crackpot!

[@alwaysdisputin9930]

14:30 _"if you have a particle you will want to remain at rest or move with constant velocity but it will not start accelerating & moving back & forth in a random way if there is no external influence & they do that because they like to maximize their lifetime so there is this principle of maximal lifetime they try to experience as long a life as possible"_ 23:00 "Singularity is in the future. Interior is not "inside" but "into the future". It is a crushing future, but it is hidden from the outside." 29:47 When BH collide, the final BH's area > A₁ + A₂ & total mass, M < M₁ + M₂ 34:31 _"You cannot measure energy very precisely over a very short period of time. So in order to measure some energy, you have to wait for a time which is longer, the bigger precision you want on your energy. So for a very tiny instant, you can have negative energy because the policeman cannot measure energy over such a short period."_ 36:29 As a BH emits radiation it loses mass: BH of mass = Earth's mass = 6 x 10²⁴ kg would last longer than the universe 10¹² kg BH produced at the Big Bang may be decaying any time now 100 kg BH would decay under 1 s 39:00 Entropy, S = no of configurations of the BH's constituents = event horizon area, ̲ ̲ ̲A ̲ ̲ ̲ 4Gₙℏ where 4Gₙℏ = 10ᐨ⁷⁰ m²

[@debsub1]

Audio quality is poor (for Maldacena). Please improve it !

[@jimsteen911]

Idk how the guy in the beginning can both not speak coherently AND also speak for infinitely long whilst not saying much at all. You could condense his intro to a paragraph and it'd be articulate than those several minutes. And you can't say he doesn't know the language, he sounds as if he were educated in England. Good God, thankfully, Juan is my favorite physicist. Humble, genius, pious.

[@annabeatasohalmy9612]

Ez a nagy Fermat-sejtes című könyvemben található a denevér mintázat. HALLELUJAH. Dicsőség Istennek. Csomó videó megtalalhato a konyveimben. HALLELUJAH. Dicsőség Istennek.

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

The introduction and introduction to the introduction finally peter out by 9:45.

[@sonarbangla8711]

Maldacena conjectured that the whole universe is a QC function, based on Hawking's wave function evolving into the unitary universe. I believe he will be the first to prove CQ functions to be error correcting system, explaining how elements to molecules to organic molecules... lead to life and consciousness.

[@sr71black]

El argentino desconocido por la mayoría de sus compatriotas..

[@ajosin]

Es un heroe de los de verdad

[@jorgechichiri5792]

Es Argento papá.

[@juandavidferreira]

Tranquilo pá... Para que querés que lo conozcan?... para que lo critiquen?. Mejor así.

[@philipcoleman8184]

The singularity and black holes, Since some black hole grow with matter, what is the relationship of size to weight, next step, what size would a black hole be if it contained all the mass from 100 galaxies the size of ours? go up by 100 times the mass then what will the dia be? Is further compression expected?

[@ramankumar-rl7rl]

good explanation

[@hitendragarg6988]

IS IT WORTH TO ATTEND THE LECTURES

[@clickdevice80]

Estas claro grande!

[@JuanRodriguez-so7xb]

If we are in space, what is space in ? I think space is in a topological black hole and that the big crunch is the fate of the universe and will close off as a black hole.

[@doodlepadhi9103]

What energy in GeV is required to smash two protons to form a micro black hole?

[@davidwilkie9551]

The default property of Time is the impermanence of the e-Pi-i sync-duration now-instant, the motivating source of frustration and and anxiety about sustainability. Of course, from this POV, Theoretical Scientific Analysis is a permanent requirement for study. So putting the Holographic Principle in the Perspective of The Big Picture of Temporal Superposition-point (Black Hole) Singularity vanishing point-zero-infinity, i-reflection containment, and matching words to Observable Actuality meanings, is why Philosophy of definitions and reiterating the study of (Mathematical) forms continues, here-now-forever.

[@idrisarab5110]

Dark matter is affected by gravity. How much of it has been gulped in by black hole? 5 times more? What role it has to play inside? Pl reply

[@amedeofilippi6336]

To form a BH a massive star should be shrinking as to reach the radius when light can no longer escape, but what about its increasing rotation? Is there a chance that rotational centrifugal force balances the increasing shrinking and thus can avoid to form a BH?

[@JAYMOAP]

Highly unlikely. The rotation independent from the object experience degeneracy. Is not the same as deformation

[@TheEmergingPattern]

Is the lifetime of a particle fixed to a certain maximum? So, the start & end are fixed in space and hence in time...? hmmm, perhaps the space-time is linked to the magnetic time with some balanced formula

[@nunoafonso2593]

Why does the hypothetical boundary of the universe being entangled with the volume of the universe mean that space time is emergent?

[@carnsoaks1]

during q&a why haven't we travelled the U, using BH to provide gravity assists? 1969, LEO, which BH, 10's of km/s spaceflight...... That kid lives in a comics world

[@bell1095]

Intro finished at 9:45

[@baharuddinbukari3088]

.. thanks

[@doodlepadhi9103]

I am a big fan of yours Maldesena.

[@doodlepadhi9103]

Maldesena is more like a rock start for me.

[@annabeatasohalmy9612]

Jaj Dávid annyira szeretlek, csak nehogy hulyeseget csináljak ha már a szüleim nem lesznek! S te sem! Sírni tudnék utánad annyira hiányzol, mázsás sulykent nehezedik rám a magány.

[@golski4878]

What is a noncontact external force ? How objects Moving without contact

[@BillEFabian]

Juan's audio went South almost immediately. Doesn't speak well for ICTS. How many physicists does it take to......?

[@bconigliaro]

How many people from a wealthy neighborhood does it take to change a light bulb? Two. One to fix the martinis and one to call the electrician.

[@mattward715]

Question: if Juan speaks of strongly interacting systems on the boundary of a black hole losing "long-distance correlations" as a function of the area of the black hole, and we know that the area of a black hole is proportional to the information contained within it, then is this concept just an association between the entropy of the "internal" AdS space and the entropy of the quantum system associated with it's boundary? In simplier terms, more information in the black hole means a higher black hole entropy and thus a more disordered quantum system on it's border?

[@tokajileo5928]

if you enter the horizon surely you enter feet first or head first any way parts of your body enters before other parts. since there is no way information to go out from behind the horizon then when you cross say feet first there is a moment when you experience 'loosing your leg' as you do not feel them because they are behind the horizon but your head is not yet. ok this time is short but real. so in theory you will know that you crossed the horizon.

[@UnforsakenXII]

Biological signals don't propagate instantaneously.

[@alexlevent8414]

Le dégarni légendaire ❤

[@tokajileo5928]

charge is information so how can a black hole have charge if no information can escape from it?

[@albertmora4290]

Mister Maldacena is an amazing physicist, and his life-story is just as amazing as his brilliant mind. Brave man. My speculation: "Black Hole" should be re-named to "Extremely-Dark-Sphere" or just "Dark Sphere" to be more accurate. Black Holes - spherical areas in space where the mass of an object falling into the horizon is infinity and the object's clock stands still don't exist because no object can have infinite mass. Dark Spheres have no inside. They only have a surface. The concept of Spacetime has no meaning inside Dark Spheres. There is no singularity. All mass, energy, momentum, space, entropy, information, etc. are on the Dark Sphere's horizon. Another idea: Every formula in physics should be amended by adding an i to the independent side of the formula. The i represents all "i"nformation not captured by the rest of the independent side of the formula. i is a combo of everything - geometry, mass, energy, momentum, information, etc. I think the i is already called a "perturbation" in some branches of physics. Last one: Every formula has meaning if we reverse the dependent variables to independent and vice-versa. MC^2 = E is as true as E = MC^2. E = MC^2 teaches us that mass and motion create energy. MC^2 = E teaches us that energy creates mass and motion. I have no idea what I'm talking about. But I'm having fun!

[@manishsingh-vk8if]

What is his life story ?

[@alankritapriya6248]

He explains with such great clarity.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Frank DiMeglio has the fundamentals of physics. Juan is not being open and honest.

[@euqinimodllewdlac7477]

If black holes attract all matter into a singularity: what becomes of all that material. If material can’t be destroyed only transformed, what is the material in the singularity transformed into? If energy; what kind of energy produces Attraction of material into that singularity?

[@johnvandenberg8883]

When it comes to popularizing physics, Juan Maldacena is by far the best. As a physicist he's a Grand Master as well.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Wrong. Frank DiMeglio is.

[@steremihai1978]

Three guys were disappointed that Juan didn't start with "Please interrupt me" and disliked the video :-)

[@captainclone1367]

I have a question for the Dr. Maldacena. What generates or creates the Higgs field? The Sun or the Black Hole at the center of our Galaxy or the Big Bang?

[@JAYMOAP]

Neither. Think in terms of excitations of the background and in terms of potential

[@Chris-St-DE]

Is "boundary theorie" the same as the "holographic principle"?

[@tzsdccstarsandgalaxiesast1546]

I think it's one application of the holographic principle.

[@dlbattle100]

I don't see how a black hole could be made in a particle accelerator since the energy of the smallest possible black hole is around 10^9 J and accelerators can reach only about 10^-6 J.

[@ARCANEmateCLAN]

build a bigger accelerator

[@sr71black]

No pueden poner sub español

[@jainalabdin4923]

I hear a lot of commentary around the event horizon that an observer free falling wouldn't feel anything special crossing it. However, if I can feel around 10g on the surface of the Earth, I sure as heck would feel a force approaching infinity crossing an event horizon. I'm not convinced you can even cross one and fall inside.

[@michaeljorgensen790]

In the case of "not feeling" anything different is only when falling straight towards a non rotating supermassive blackhole where the event horizon would be a huge distance away from the singularity at the center. This is how some people come to the conclusion in their own minds that "spaghettification" would not take place until you have continued to fall farther into the interior. The problem is the people that think this way only do the thought experiment in their minds and do not do the math. When you do the math...in order to not feel anything different you would have had to be free falling towards the black hole (you would not feel the acceleration) but as you cross the event horizon your velocity would have to be close to the speed of light just before entering and the speed of light after you cross. People like to point out the flaw in that is that you are matter and matter can't reach the speed of light. However, matter that reaches the speed of light is now 100 percent Energy and is no longer considered matter. The time experienced by something traveling at the speed of light is zero. So the math says that from the perspective of someone falling into a blackhole they would cross the event horizon and hit the singularity instantly after that (from their frame of reference) even if the blackhole is a light year across from the outside. What even the smartest people always seem to forget is that the only thing allowed on the interior of a black hole is compactification of every frame of reference and convergence of any two vectors. So you are right not to be convinced.

[@jamesmonegan7275]

Much of the information about black holes is mathematical or theoretical and as far as I can tell it seems common enough for people to talk about going through a black hole event horizon or what it is like inside a black hole, but that doesn't make sense to me. It would seem that if a black hole is a super dense object left over from a star collapse you could never go inside there is no inside it's not hollow or full of chocolate syrup it is solid like a rock. It is so massive and compressed it is probably a perfect sphere and absolutely smooth. As you are drawn in closer by its be super strong gravity, you are broken up and heated smaller and smaller on to the atomic and subatomic scales and dissipated through the ecretion disk and high speed jets.

[@JAYMOAP]

That's right, there is a possibility that you can not fall INTO a black hole at all but shred apart before that. They use examples of no rotating black holes in these examples but there is no proof for different classes

[@paulnimmo3233]

wow thought I misunderstood that title .

[@marksakowski9272]

In principle we can do anything but entropy usually doesn't allow it.

[@JAYMOAP]

Legend

[@SuperProtector]

A massive particle will disintegrated before it reaches the horizon... But we are always talking about when we cross the horizn and do not feel anything... The geomtry of spacetime changes continually, the horizon may not support massive particles... inside the horizon only massless particles are supported. ?? some fantasy... it is a nice talk..

[@saturdaysequalsyouth]

Why is the intro 10 minutes?

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Frank DiMeglio is the world authority on gravitation. Juan knows that.

[@josephlau13d77]

crackpot alert

[@harrykalern9447]

17:38 Why objects deform space time? Why heavier objects deform more?

[@nitinrbhat]

Because of the mass

[@michaeltaylor6133]

I believe you.

[@sarahlight956]

An other brilliant One😁it seems you did an equation on wormholes! Let's hope I won't burn my dinner🤣🤣🤣I forget time when writing on science! Fascinating! Let me help you a little bit(well you will have to watch Warner's Interstellar, this Warner time traveller Con! ) The difference between a black hole and a wormhole is that black holes are FULL of Information , which means time though almost stops, and space vibrates to almost an infinite speed, in an extremely cold conditions with no exchange of energy...wormholes , however contain NO INFORMATION, space stops vibrating, Sakinah😊you see? That is why Light erases memory. I call that The Queen passage: Imagine the dark bowing, leaving a passage, giving allegiance to light.😊It is a salute of allegiance, and wormholes happen when light and dark work together, they know the meeting "place": the dark creates the passage, and light naturally flows, no huge distances, just a point, in Sakinah😊 It is an other story when the dark doesn't work with light...

[@golski4878]

Time is not stopping because time is a different thing made by human perspective we measure how time stops by looking atoms and movements of partical under gravity Because there is a huge non contact external force to the matter There is a realitionship between the electrons spining and gravity force Because gravity force Doesnt let any object to move any direction craking them with huge force what i understand about einsteins teory gravity force and sub atomic forces Are related but how ?? we dont know

[@davidwilkie9551]

Back Engineering a Projection Drawing Graphics program reveals how the internal design of Circuitry and time duration timing modulation interference memory is tabulated resonances, if you accept that e-Pi-i sync-duration connectivity controlled by the mathematical Circuit of the Standard Model configuration and Periodic Table resonance bonding location approximation as it occurs in natural superimposed potential possibilities of real-time logarithmic singularity Timing-spacing sync. Ie AdSpace is a particular specific relative motion timing rotation/modulation interference ratein AM-FM Communication = Projection Drawing integration. Laser Pulses are reversible, which is only another aspect of demodulation/harmonic tuning. Mass-energy-momentum compositions of e-Inflation from E=mC² Superspin logarithmic singularity condensation, ie a very understandable concept of positioning-location coordination Conception.., CFT.

[@luisavila8342]

White Black holes.." so its not good as a flashlight." Hahahahahahah im dyyyingg

[@pacajalbert9018]

Od čierne 🖤 dieri sme asi tak jeden milimeter 🔭 ďaleko

[@MrLadiezman95]

Black holes hold life in balance by this point right

[@doodlepadhi9103]

EP= ERP

[@OneCrazyDanish]

aka Mathemagics. Plasma Cosmology has already taken the Crown. You just didn't notice.

[@mrwideboy]

I heard the India bloke who spent 10 minutes introducing him now i cant hear his voice.

[@zendan37]

Every planet has an escape velocity associated with it ,depending on its mass. Molecules of gases move around at specific velocities. The mass of Earth is such that not much oxygen and nitrogen cannot escape. On Mars, they can. Black holes are so massive and their escape velocities are so high that not even photons travelling at the speed of light can escape. The centre of a black hole is collapsed matter. They are super- neutron stars. ` Is it possible that the Hawking radiation they emit ends up as hydrogen?

[@MrGodofcar]

What is the escape velocity at the center of a black hole?

[@zendan37]

@@MrGodofcar It's greater than C. That's why the star is "black".

[@MrGodofcar]

@@zendan37 But isn't light the fastest thing in the universe?

[@zendan37]

@@MrGodofcar Yes it is, but it's speed is still finite and the gravity exerted by an extremely dense and massive collapsed star may have an escape velocity higher than that. i.e a black hole.

[@ankushsharma5122]

Can i join icts?

[@jsnthurst1]

Juan is his secret identity. I think he's really the Engineer from Prometheus!

[@tonemonkerud9112]

tbh the eqivalence prinsiple has no bearing on time dialation, that conlcution is proven wrong, it just is.

[@doodlepadhi9103]

It's a metaphor.

[@derleumedia]

14:00 live fast die young

[@danielparsons2859]

the speed of light = 299 792 458 m / s Relative to what?

[@rayzorrayzor9000]

Relative to anything and everything stationary or in motion .

[@olasek7972]

Relative to your frame of reference

[@Q.Mechanic]

It's invariant

[@frankdimeglio8216]

The University of the Punjab, right on their page, has given the following a thumbs up. It is a most fundamental and gigantic unification of physics. University of the Punjab, a supreme masterpiece of physical understanding. Absolute, clear, ingenious, and perfect proof that gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy: It is impossible to understand gravity apart from both ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND inertia/inertial resistance. Balanced inertia/inertial resistance is fundamental, as gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity and ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND balanced, as gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Fantastic. Outer "space" involves full inertia, AND it is fully invisible AND black. The sun and photons are linked AND balanced, AND the speed of light is inertial resistance. ALSO, energy has/involves gravity; AND energy has/involves inertia/inertial resistance. So, ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Magnificent !! Indeed, E=mc2 AND F=ma are equivalently expressed or understood when gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Again, the speed of light is inertial resistance. Gravity/acceleration involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance, as gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. (Both equations apply to the sun.) Great !! Gravity/acceleration involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance, as a given planet sweeps out equal areas in equal times in accordance with F=ma. Great !! So, gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Therefore, inertia/inertial resistance is proportional to (or balanced with/as) gravitational force/energy; as this unifies and balances ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND gravity; as this balances gravity and inertia. So, in the case of the "black holes", there is full gravity with/involving full and balanced inertia/inertial resistance. Accordingly, gravitational force/energy is proportional to (or balanced with/as) inertia/inertial resistance; as this balances and unifies gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy; as this balances gravity and inertia. This explains E=mc2 AND F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Therefore, gravity/acceleration involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance; as gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. (This also makes perfect sense of what is perpetual motion.) The "black hole(s)" AND photon(s)/speed of light are linked AND balanced opposites that reveal that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. So, "mass"/energy involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance in accordance with what is balanced gravitational/electromagnetic force/energy; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (This also explains the supergiant stars that were falsely deemed as being incapable of existence.) So, the falling man feels no gravity; as the feeling of gravity by the man who is standing on the earth/ground ALSO involves balanced inertia/inertial resistance; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Indeed, objects fall at the same rate in accordance with what is balanced inertia/inertial resistance AND gravity/acceleration; as gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Accordingly, inertia/inertial resistance is proportional to (or balanced with/as) gravitational force/energy; as this balances and unifies gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy; as this balances gravity and inertia. Absolutely ingenious !!! I have now proven the fundamental, extensive, and true unification of physics. By Frank DiMeglio

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Frank DiMeglio is the world authority on gravitation.

[@Mehlsack93]

47:00 escher

[@federicopagano6590]

Este canal censura comentarios

[@davidwilkie9551]

A constant speed of light is actually obvious to anyone who understands the Quantum Chemistry, period doubling, cause-effect resonance of the QM-Time modulation wave-package, but the logic of the Quantum Operator obscures the timing-spacing, like one-way mirrors, that appears to create this brane-boundary image within-without the wave-package. (Galaxy-universe in a kid's QM-bubble marble?, of fractal spinfoam) A Black Hole is an example of the one-way mirrored surface of the Universe.., like Sunlight on the bottom of a swimming pool with waves on top that focus a bright and dark image on the bottom, it is the same in principle as the bright and dark shaping of timing-spacing of the observable universe in AM-FM quantum bubbles of spinfoam resonance. The principle is simple modulation-timing at the temporal superposition vanishing point singularity, but the available 2D picture of a 3D image, of an infinite-eternal "interference-entanglement" integration, ..is an "Artistic" technique of imagination requiring years of Apprenticeship. So the graphical presentation of the lecture is probably the most effective way of teaching a core concept of mathematically derived logic of exclusion, to demonstrate what is. Quantum Duality self-defining meaning is of an eternal-infinite virtual projection of QM-Time fields from the connection singularity vanishing point of eternity-now, in a hierarchy of relative timing-shaping wave-packaging, from an empirical-deterministic classical observer's perceptions in mathematically-linguistic associations to the dominance of quantization cause-effect probabilities in possibilities. "Parallel" word meaning has this quantum, axial-radial-tangential.., sequentially dualistic co-existence association of symmetries, dominated by existence-now. "In particular", travel is the same in principle everywhere in the observable universe because it's coherent with the same clock-speed that determines the Phys-Chem properties of this reality. If, like the Galaxy in the bubble, the particular quantum fields particle chemistry of the chosen zones around travellers is phase-locked in resonance, then the universe, in its wormhole aspect around the bubble, can be jumped through. (?)

[@UnforsakenXII]

bro what

[@rayzorrayzor9000]

This is what happens when you give an academic acid lol 😂

[@frankdimeglio8216]

The page "Physics of the COSMOS (Book Series)" has given the following writing the thumbs up on its page. FULLY UNDERSTANDING E=MC2 AND F=MA: E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This is PROVEN by BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time dilation ALSO proves that GRAVITY IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. THINK about it. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS CLEARLY GRAVITY. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL FORCE/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. PERFECT. It is proven. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is FULLY INVISIBLE AND black. By Frank DiMeglio

[@finbarmostyn-williams8713]

Great talk - terrible questions!

[@starlord6088]

He looks like Steve Jobs...

[@almirahmedic4399]

Maybee black holes are new universes and dark matter and dark energy is maybee vakuum

[@almirahmedic4399]

@Dirk Knight i wright here maybee some physikal read this but that Thing noubady know now and maybee never

[@almirahmedic4399]

And i am not physikal its only what i think

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Frank DiMeglio is RECOGNIZED as having surpassed Newton and Einstein.

[@frankdimeglio8216]

Frank DiMeglio is the world authority on unification in physics BY FAR.

[@yendorelrae5476]

Jesus, I was worn out by the presenter.....stammered for over ten minutes telling nothing we do didn't already know...damn I need a break now!

[@JDhvactech]

Umm uhh umm jesus Indian guy spit it out

[@yasirshah284]

Poor questions asked by the students, what an opportunity missed. Abdus salam the founder of this institute must be turning in his grave.

[@Juan-yj2nn]

I tbink that maldacena should learn to public speak. He is a genius and everything but I find this lecture somewhat boring.

[@JAYMOAP]

That's a good sign, it indicates that you may understand the topic:))

[@Crunklife2010]

Uh, I want to comment but uh, uh, I can’t uh figure uh what I want to uh say

[@jimsteen911]

Those questions at the end were some of the dumbest questions I've ever heard ever. Who was he lecturing to - kindergarteners?

[@jimsteen911]

Normally I'd never call any question dumb, I'm not a hater, but these were bad

[@smilereceive]

Not the best speaker.