UK Barrister Analysis: Amber Heard Credibility in UK Johnny Depp Trial

Lots of questions were raised With respect to Amber Heard’s credibility in the UK trial. Here is an analysis of the judgement and why I think some of those elements should have been taken into account against her testimony.
Check out my exclusive content at www.blackbeltbarrister.com
Also me: kzbin.info?...
My wife's cooking: kzbin.info...
Address for PAID Formal Advice ONLY: [e-mail]
Disclaimer: Neither this nor any other video, may be taken as legal advice. I accept no liability whatever for any reliance placed upon it, as there is no contract between us and I am not instructed by you.
For formal advice, please contact [e-mail].
💌 Become a channel member to access stripes and perks!
/ @blackbeltbarrister
MY CAMERA GEAR
🎥 Big Camera amzn.to/3yFFcFf
🎥 Small Camera amzn.to/2RB7ez9
🎙 RODE VIDEOMic Pro+ amzn.to/2QCJURi
Gobe ND Filter amzn.to/2R3eEuA
Neewer Ring Light amzn.to/3aOkLtT
Switch Pod amzn.to/3sZb8yA
JOBY Tripod amzn.to/3dXJYDT
External Media Drive amzn.to/3uxNDOQ And if you like my house and decor:
MY CHAIR:
amzn.to/3mYpPBB
Lamp 1 - amzn.to/3ntbEnm
Lamp 2 - amzn.to/3dXfUZi 🎓 Brilliant contract law book:
amzn.to/2PHC2O1 🎓 Excellent book with an overview of criminal law:
amzn.to/3gTPEAV 🎓 Learn more about trespass and tort law:
amzn.to/32N6TLS
(Affiliate link)
LAW FAQS
• Common Law
CONSUMER LAW PLAYLIST:
• Consumer Law
TREE LAW PLAYLIST:
• Tree Law Miniseries
ROAD TRAFFIC LAW PLAYLIST:
• Road Traffic Law
FAMILY LAW PLAYLIST:
• Family Law
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
I'm a Barrister of England and Wales.
Videos for educational guidance only, Always seek advice before taking action. Videos on my channel are not legal advice and should not be taken as such. I accept no liability for any reliance placed upon the content of these videos or references, therein.
#blackbeltbarrister #johnnydepp #amberheard
Description contains affiliate links; I will occasionally earn commissions from qualifying purchases or leads generated.

[@mystifeyed]

Wow the judge was so obviously biased. He had multiple instances of her lying and didn’t seem to care. Unbelievable.

[@melissadunkling7010]

It's crazy to think that a judge is bias the person who supposed to look at facts and he literally made excuses for her own admissions its mindblowing to try and comprehend his findings

[@andydudley1775]

he not just seem to care he secured it as truth and used that as a judgment call.

[@ApacheMagic]

My take on it….simplest answer is usually the most likely. It’s the old Amber effect. As hard to like as she is now we’ve all seen her true colours, there’s no denying that most people are overwhelmed by how attractive she is. She enchanted him (or perhaps ‘stupefied’ is the better term) with her personal charisma, which rendered him incapable of logical thought or assessment of her behaviour. Even judge’s get lonely and have hormones. The old man just had a crush, mate, and bought into her poor little girl story. She was working it and he probably got whiplash off her eyelash flutters. Unfortunately a lot of men in particular are susceptible, but even straight women have been known to be stunned by her personal beauty, if she jumps out at them unexpectedly. One actress (who’s name I regrettably forget right now) called her ‘blinding’ (on the Graham Norton show with JD). In NZ we have a rude word that far better describes it. Starts with C, rhymes with DumpTruck.

[@MargaritaOnTheRox]

@@ApacheMagic She's not that attractive. I believe it was more the fact that his son had connections to The Sun.

[@Mrskess]

Have you been to a family court? This is exactly what happens in family courts here and evidence of abuse to mother and child is ignored and abusers get residency of children. People have no idea what happens in the secret family courts here

[@NiceLoki]

That judge went so far out of his way to "believe" Amber it does really question his entire judgement in this case.

[@counterfeitclone]

its not that he went out if his way to believe amber. The Judge, Andrew Nichol is intimately connected with Dan Wootton, The Sun’s journalist who posted the defamatory allegation that JD was a “wife beater”. The connection is through the Judge’s own son, Robert N Palmer, who works alongside Wootton at TalkRadio, part of the same group owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News paper the sun

[@CCCC-rw9hx]

Unreal how spot-on Dr Curry's character assessment of Heard was.

[@Puffafish1]

Yeah she was bang on point about Scamber Turd.

[@keke5577]

It’s so interesting how people (myself included) were skeptical about how Dr. Curry could diagnose after such a short evaluation, then AH went on to behave exactly how Dr.Curry described.

[@tadpoleinnit2643]

I was unimpressed by the good doctor's choice of muffins for brunch. Croissants would have been a much nicer alternative.

[@janejane5281]

Yes! A qualified professional who offered a well-educated diagnosis. Dr. Curry was bang on!

[@tadpoleinnit2643]

@@janejane5281 - ....but muffins are full of processed gloop - a nice locally-sourced apple would have been a much better alternative for both parties.

[@MeginAL]

The judge used evidence of Amber lying to justify that she was not lying. In my opinion this shows that the judge was biased in favor of Amber from the very beginning. Possibly due to outside influence on the judge.

[@deebullock9284]

Wasn't her lawyer in Virginia, Elaine, kin to the lawyer in Australia??

[@Gmjd64]

@@deebullock9284 elaine was with her in the uk there are pics of her coming out of court together !

[@bevmacdonald9008]

@@deebullock9284 Elaine went with Amber when she was in the UK to testify; Elaine and Amber went to a dinner hosted by his wife during the trial. He and she are involved with something like the ACLU in England called the Doughty Street Practice or something like that. The judge had written a book about women's rights and his co-author's ex-wife is possibly also a colleague of Elaine's or the lawyer she had immediately prior. It seems this gender biased dv narrative is a common denominator 🤔

[@stevie681]

Dear Lord,I wonder how many other cases brought before this judge were corrupt.

[@philo2077]

All? All!

[@annstar4306]

So do I wonder! 🤗

[@teresatownsend1089]

Great statement . I feel bad for anyone who has to have him for a judge , you already know he won’t rule for justice . Sad justice system

[@stevie681]

@@teresatownsend1089 he retired right after this case .

[@rhondapruett1903]

😳 scary thinking that the UK justice system hangs on the decisions made by the likes of this judge!

[@carolinebrown539]

Everyone needs to sign the petition & get this case against JD looked at again!

[@dlouise5680]

Bizarre that AH wanted to sit in on the UK trial & that she asked the judge. Just another example of her harassing Johnny with her presence and refusing to leave him alone. IMO, this is another form of abuse.

[@emilala9049]

My abusive ex is still popping up occasionally, and we haven't been together for 18 years, these kinds of people will never leave you alone. It's part of why I haven't ever believed Amber, because abused women don't chase after the men who hit them, the one who is being hit tries to get away, it's the one who does the hitting that won't ever let you leave. Even once you do leave, you can never be totally free. I'm pretty sure my ex calls whenever he's single. We have a son together he hasn't seen him in 15 years, he also has 7 other children, and I assume he treats their mother's the same way he treats me 🙄

[@sharonwilson8208]

Agreed. But, it shows also how she's learned to use her gender as a woman. That's the only way she got her roles, not her acting ability. One on one with a judge, she can sway him with her, shall we say, beauty.

[@bevmacdonald9008]

The author of the Sun article, Dan Wooten declined to testify and actually sent Amber to testify in his place. It is my personal opinion that the reason she and her lawyers can't stop saying she won in the UK is because that slander piece published by Wooten was written with her and was part of their strategy to help protect her from being successfully sued for defamation in America. It secretly really was her suit, the Sun article was published to lay the groundwork, to create the idea that other people said things before she did, to sort of open a path for her to (violate the nda and) slander Depp with impunity while being the ACLU DV Ambassador, imho. And I agree it is more abuse perpetrated on Depp. Also, "Gone Potty " was part of the headline and I think it was more a hint to Depp about who was the real author, rather than just a Potter pun.

[@Reshhaha]

And she did a press conference outside the courtroom after the UK trial ended, right? I mean, she wasn't the defendant so why would she even do that? Lol. Sort of a crazy person move lol

[@sharonwilson8208]

Um, yeah! Then speaking to Savannah Guthrie before the awards hearing that she lost in the US. When asked why no one else came forward about JD, in the middle of the MeToo movement, she said "and look what happened to me. Would you?". Seriously? She's playing with a powder keg with that statement.

[@yvonne..]

It sounds like the judge was under her spell! Accepting all AH statements as true & dismissing everyone else as false.

[@katharina7502]

Probably more under the spell of the sun‘s money

[@liamdevine8063]

Under someone's spell but not Amder's, try Mr Murdoch's! Owner of The Sun has a personal relationship with the judge and employs his son!

[@maggsbufton1969]

She Probably boinked him.

[@Jesswithlessstress]

I wish this would be re-opened! Please sign the petition! Please guys!

[@strandedinseattle9931]

I tried, but when I hit 'enter' it sent me to a page to give the barrister donation money instead. Now I am getting spam email begging for my money for him.

[@geneivemary4234]

The petition makes us feel better. But UK law will not be swayed by any petition (thank god)!

[@galwithgloves8078]

Thank you for this! Her fraudulent acts speak volumes.

[@sydnidowney3598]

Does the fact that AH committed perjury when she said she gave her divorce settlement to charity and the judge assigned her credibility because of that?

[@babs3652]

Johnny should have you on his side and make an appeal in the UK. He couldn't have a better lawyer who has all the knowledge of the UK justice system. 🙏👍👍👍

[@XxSonnyBlackzZ]

Or an honest not biased judge

[@annstar4306]

Totally!!! 🙋🙋

[@bernardcassidy6497]

If British justice is to maintain its Sterling reputation, internationally, it has a duty to ensure that justice is seen to be done and any miscarriage of justice should be rectified and the respect will be even greater for a system that can acknowledge that errors can occur but won't be covered up and buried in legal jargon, love this channel , best ever .

[@Wise__guy]

Oh they lost my respect when they decided to extradite Julian Assange to the United States.. so you really think they’ll do anything about Johnny?

[@rostallar4243]

All 3 countries need to seen as credible by going after AH, for lying & making her accountable for her actions, sadly I feel this won’t happen, AH will continue to spread her lies spread her toxicity, I don’t know what it will take for the legal systems of these 3 countries to take action against her but again I feel that something needs to be done because if it doesn’t her & her followers are going to think they have some sort of credibility, which the world knows the truth, that they have no credibility whatsoever, I fear what message they are sending to other people out there who are like minded, by not taking action against her & others who have lied for her.

[@linamatthews512]

@@rostallar4243 Boycott the stations, papers, etc who seem to support Amber. Netflix is already going through the agony of supporting Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, even after their lies on Oprah show was found out.

[@rostallar4243]

@@linamatthews512 Exactly Warner Bros & Disney are about to find that out by firing JD without proof.

[@ef1757]

The U.K. would never go against their own for Americans or any other. Collectively, Brits believe Great Britain is a superior country and its citizens believe they’re also superior to Americans. Sorry, please don’t come for me. I live here and that’s what they tell me and have done for three decades. The judge in that U.K. case probably scoffed at JDs lawsuit against The Sun Newspaper. Plus, said judge has been nefarious, (allegedly) in his dealings regarding the judgement because of the company his wife allegedly kept including AH. Also, another simple thing for eg in entertainment: a competitive TV show.. No American (who competes in Britain) has ever won a show in the U.K. as opposed to Brits who would have (and have) won many times in America. Unfair? Of course! However, the WORLD got to see the entire contents of the Virginia case from legal lens and we, the court of public opinion AND more importantly, the jury in the VA case and we saw who the real guilty party was! That was a revelation! Shout out to Brown-Rudnick and ALL of their awesome, fantastic lawyers! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

[@boot2342]

Can this judge be held accountable. I realize right after he resigned but he should still facing charges!

[@tnndll4294]

There should be question time for UK judges.

[@suehancey8355]

She would appear to be a serial liar, and very sadly the UK judge seemed to have fallen under her spell, or is too naive to be sat on the bench. ( eg his statement that people who come to court are under oath and therefore tell the truth, if I’m understanding this correctly) Having lied (allegedly) to homeland security and got away with it, she now seems to believe there are no consequences to anything she lies about, which would appear to be everything!

[@pam751]

The judge is connected, one way or another to the paper. So no matter what was presented in truth it was going to be in favor of the paper! The judge needs to be charged for misconduct of the law, and Amber for perjury! I cannot believe the the UK court would want this kind of reputation!

[@hlwhhlwh2351]

@@pam751 it's never bothered them before. The trouble this a very public case.

[@AshleyJade1]

From what I have heard from multiple different people, the judges son actually worked for The Sun at the time. That, in my opinion, was the conflict of interest and should not have been allowed. Another judge should have heard the case.

[@AshleyJade1]

@@pam751 I agree 100%

[@Asshole88]

Johnny beats women #JusticeForAmber

[@queenizzydeigh9085]

That judge just seems to have been very determined to let AH off the hook, closing his eyes to all the evidence 🙄

[@emilala9049]

Not let AH off the hook, she wasn't a party to that suit, to let the Sun, a shoddy tabloid rag off the hook. One where it's rumored anyways that his son worked and if that's true, that judge should never have heard this case in the first place, it's an obvious conflict of interest.

[@rethapretorius9860]

Paragraph 126 - I respectfully disagree with the Honourable Judge. Any false statement, especially to authorities (be they whatever) does and always should reflect negatively on the credibility of said witness.

[@bevmacdonald9008]

and the court was even presented with two occasions she did that!

[@nightsgrow6575]

Absolutely mindboggling how he could say that and also claim that she was credible simply because she testified under oath, because “people under oath tell the truth”. Well, we’ve seen that she doesn’t mind lying to the authorities, what makes you think you and your court are any different?

[@maggsbufton1969]

I agree with you, but calling this judge “ honourable “ is a bit of a stretch. He clearly had a conflict of interest and did not recuse himself from hearing this case.

[@griffith500tvr]

What's the point of winning the case if she does not shut up? Apparently a book is next? What to do?

[@joethelion6016]

👍

[@kb4014]

Along with Disney, WB - I have also not seen Dan Wootton apologise to JD for having false allegations thrown at it. Dan Wootton wrote that article without any hard evidence against him and he lost jobs from Disney and WB because of her lies. JD deserves a huge apology from many. This world is so unjust where he has been found guilty without the evidence to back it up 😥

[@kb4014]

@Vintage Bollinger I agree with what you have said an even though he has proved it, it's disappointing that he had to go through all of this as he was accused and dropped without evidence to back up the claims.

[@sharonwilson8208]

He lost legacy roles, not just roles. Now Warner Bros has 1 movie they may not be able to release because of Ezra Miller (same movie JD was asked to step away), and Aquaman 2 that keeps being released at a further date. With other actors caught in other's misconduct.

[@SoniaGilioliF]

Dan Wooton is a hideous and disgusting being. He continues to slander and hated and hates Michael Jackson, even after he was killed by that subspecies of "doctor"; now the victim of libel and hatred of him is Johnny Depp. The Sun has ALWAYS been a junk newspaper and it never stops being.

[@bevmacdonald9008]

WB needs to give up on these villains being presented to us for heroes. Soon after the Sun win, Wooten actually wrote about Depp again, about how himself and Amber had been contacting JKR personally to get Depp fired. Some say he is a buddy of Musk's and that's how they got together, others say through the ACLU and their UK friends at the Doughty Street practice...hmm, ACLU, there's e lon again 🤔

[@SoniaGilioliF]

@@sharonwilson8208 Please keep trying to release Aquaman 2 with A.H, Fantastic Beasts and the movie with Ezra Miller. THEY WILL LOSE EVERYTHING !!!

[@100Mickl]

This judge seems to be incredibly wrong on so much this is outrageous

[@patlydeval2453]

I'm so shocked to see that AH can lie under oath all around the world and get away with it ! Is lying under oath legal now ? I don't think so ! What do the prosecutors wait for ? Well done on your content and congratulations on the 200 000 subscribers ! 🎉🎉🎉

[@jesussaves7849]

I do not think any prosecutors were involved except for in.Australia.

[@TopazTaryth]

I probably sound like an insane version of a sort of reverse conspiracy theorist (what a good first sentence for a bestselling book!). I'd think that the legal systems of Australia, the UK, and the US would *actively pursue* Amber Heard for committing perjury in three countries' legal systems in such a blatantly PUBLIC and nonchalant manner! If the legal system doesn't show ANY consequences for perjury then quite frankly the system will be worthless. This was SO obvious and public that she really needs to be made an example of, in my opinion.

[@madeleinedonaldson4422]

Yet Australia is usually so strict ? Look what they did to Novak Jokovich ( spelling)?

[@jaxworld4490]

Yes i agree 100%

[@teresatownsend1089]

Not only did she lie but she took up valuable resources of the courts which cost money and makes less time aNd resources for those who really need it . I think she should have fines to pay for doing that .

[@linamatthews512]

@@teresatownsend1089 I don't know if Amber has the funds to pay for all her offenses. She should have thought of that before lying.

[@tankgirl6446]

4 countries technically. The Dutch?talk show she claimed to have donated the $7million to which the UK judge based his decision on stating she didn't keep the money so she had no motives to lie. WHAT A JOKE

[@theogantisnipe]

All this makes me think the judge should be investigated for bias and potentially disbarred

[@jesussaves7849]

He conveniently retired after the trial with The Sun. Seems mighty suspicious to me.

[@cathy9768]

The judge seemed to have made up his mind early on and ignored all evidence that might put that conclusion in jeopardy. Shameful in my opinion.

[@sharonwilson8208]

So far, I'm appalled with the Judge in this matter. What about her speaking engagements, recorded and resubmitted on social media? One month prior to both UK an US trials, AH was claiming how great social media was, uniting survivors. Most often, during these short engagements, she had difficulty completing sentences and/or making little sense. Hired to speak for 5-8 minutes on DV, changing laws, or even getting people to register to vote and actually cast ballots... despite having a teleprompter!

[@Gmjd64]

and getting $33,000 dollars for every time she spoke at these engagements !

[@stephanieolsen8148]

I'm surprised that the prior arrest didn't make it.

[@jesussaves7849]

Me too!

[@sharmilaanand2859]

I think the UK trial was so unjust to Johnny and he could not appeal. But can it be RE - OPENED?? . When I seen a few clips of her at the UK trial her mannerisms eating during trial and her the facial expressions while answering gave me doubts about her credibility. I think even Australia should call her back I heard she poked fun of Australia as a country and named her dog after the PM if I not mistaken. She is getting away so easily with so much that is why she has become more arrogant. If she is not stopped now and brought to mother earth she will go on.

[@bcrouch2626]

I don't know how long you been on this channel but he has a petition video to reopen Johnny's case . If you haven't signed you might want to watch it

[@leanneporter2661]

She is representing so many who are getting away with there bullshit..because she is connecting herself with the alphabet people.

[@bcrouch2626]

@@leanneporter2661 that is happening all over the world . People are finally starting to realize this crap is going on .

[@bevmacdonald9008]

The deposition video in which she is seen being disrespectful and eating was for the divorce proceedings. The divorce proceedings ended up throwing her allegations out with prejudice. The NDA they both signed prevents Amber supposedly or Depp and his people from discussing what happened then. At that time they released a joint statement affirming their respect for one another and explicitly stating neither one "made false accusations" of violence for "money". Amber thought that would protect her while she was spreading her slander abroad, hobnobbing in the UK with Rocketman, imho

[@gail2485]

I think she has a naturally arrogant face. Recently I saw photos of her shopping at TJ Maxx and she looked aloof and arrogant.

[@bellbup1014]

Wow. How is this judge not being investigated.

[@ef1757]

I think we should get Piers Morgan on the case with a panel of lawyers.

[@annakarenina3188]

I was surprised the judge discounted two of his security, when one had been a sheriff in the USA, and another had been a HMPS guard in the UK. Surely if the security guards both left their positions with positive work records, their oaths sworn to justice still apply, and made them credible witnesses. I find it interesting that AH had a very high turn over of staff with some claiming bullying and PTSD/anxiety symptoms from the bullying they endured from AH. Kate James was apparently a "skeleton" by the end of her time with AH, due to being worked so hard, without being allowed meal breaks. .... Meanwhile, JD had longstanding and happy staff, some with him for decades. ... High staff turnovers are big red flags for me, and the latter, imo, speaks to good character of someone?

[@annetunstall967]

The judge erred at law, I understand that the bench must be respected but the way this case went showed an absolute bias in my opinion. Why even police officers and other witnesses were not believed above the word of Amber Heard, I and so many others find hard to understand.

[@badnoodlez]

It's an obvious conflict of interest. Totally corrupt.

[@silentsiren3879]

totally corrupt judge indeed in the UK

[@Asshole88]

the judge proved JD beats women #JusticeForAmber

[@sodoffbaldrick3038]

Absolutely agree. This just seems so glaringly obvious, but does the UK have any way of looking into this, that is not going to put your career in jeopardy?

[@liamdevine8063]

'Justice' Nicoll's son remains under Murdoch's employment and his and Murdoch's relationship is as fruitful as ever for both.

[@maryturpel8413]

So it boils down to Judge Nicol cherry picking.

[@bcrouch2626]

Sounds like the judge made excuses for Amber because then he turns around and uses almost the same exact thing against anyone who said or brought something against amber

[@paulajoseph1805]

I wish they would reopen the case in the uk I have already signed the petition this girl gets away w everything

[@paulineyoung4260]

I certainly believe in YOUR reasoning of the UK trial It should be heard again with a jury & new judge

[@annstar4306]

Yes your right ! 🙋

[@interactiveillusionist]

It is not just her credibility that is lacking, the CREDIBILITY of the JUDGE is also lacking.

[@rethapretorius9860]

TONE OF VOICE in an audio recording speaks volumes. In addition you are privy to hearing what exactly transpired in those moments.

[@brightonbabe2139]

Importing dogs to Australia is a major offence in Australia, and she is unlikely allowed to be able to return for several years if the government chooses. Also lying to Homeland Security is a serious issue. Had she been paying a friend here in Australia it is likely that her friend would be sent out of Australia and banned for 3 years. More than impinging her credibility, AH has committed offenses. I suspect the judge is susceptible to a lovely woman.

[@db198081]

I can’t help but believe the judge was attracted by AH. AH ran in the same circles as his wife so can’t believe the judge hadn’t spent time with her.

[@donnabarney1866]

He was affiliated with Murdock Family. Elon has a Murdock on the Board of Tesla. The Judge was retiring. Not having to be concerned about his career, it may have been easier to do to Johnny.

[@lisaquigley-moon9583]

AH is going after our boy Tug (umbrella guy)

[@badnoodlez]

He will be fine. He's literally spitting facts.

[@nightsgrow6575]

It’s mindboggling how this judge can defend siding with AH because “she testified under oath and people under oath tell the truth”. Wasn’t JD under oath? Was this the judges first trial? Or has every case he’s had before this only been extremely honest people admitting to whatever crime they’re accused of?

[@miraheil5521]

It was set up

[@lostbeyondpluto]

great breakdown and analysis! so good to see this case finally being talked about by larger channels to spread the word!

[@vickiwhite4004]

The judge put GREAT weight on her donating her divorce settlement . Found her credible and the only reason her donations became a big thing in the Virginia case .. Thats perjury.

[@jesussaves7849]

She didn’t donate the money though.

[@brookebyers1114]

I think the judge will believe Amber regardless what Depp brought forth. The judge was influence by his son and other people in connection with the Sun.

[@r1tac324]

It was interesting to find out from Christina Pykles that AH had asked for and was granted to sit in on the UK trial, from the Judge. Why comes to mind.

[@bevmacdonald9008]

She testified in place of Wooten. It was my understanding it was Dan Wooten who requested that, but that puts it in another light. I think the reason Dan did not was to avoid contradictory testimony. The author himself should have been compelled to testify, imho

[@jesussaves7849]

She was his wife’s friend maybe? There is a chart that shows how the judge and Amber are connected to EVERYTHING!

[@jesussaves7849]

@@bevmacdonald9008 EXACTLY!

[@PinkyakaAyannaj]

Could you please do a video breaking down the various personal relationships that were involved in the UK Trial? With Amber having ties to the judge and the judges son working for the Sun.

[@ef1757]

You’re asking him to do reporting as well? 😳

[@Tiewaz]

Given the depth and breadth that the judge went through in his judgment to explain his reasons for everything, given the inconsistencies in what he did and did not accept and what he did and did not (or would not) take into consideration, it sure doesn't reflect well on the judge or UK courts maintaining a lack of bias. His ties to the media company notwithstanding, it's like he was blindly accepting that "she is a (young, pretty, blue-eyed, blond-haired woman) and he is a man who makes lots of money with every movie" argument. Can JD appeal again, given the plethora of evidence of AH's lies, in particular to evidence that was accepted as valid but since proven questionable at best?

[@donnaritch4934]

The fact that the judge in this case, if I'm not mistaken, has a son working for the Sun, correct? IF so, would that not be an automatic case of conflict of interest with the judge and he should have recused himself from presiding the case? Here in the states, normally, because the judge would have a close or immediate relative working for the defendant in a case he/she is assigned to would have had to recuse him/herself from the case due to conflict of interest. Does the the UK basically have the same rule?

[@jesussaves7849]

He was working for a Talk Radio Station also owned by Rupert Murdoch.

[@geneivemary4234]

As a female from UK I didn't believe her back then! All the media coverage with her feed bandana! Didn't look like any kind of victim to me... looked more like someone in a publicity tour! It worked for me cos I'd never heard of her! Most Londoners thought it was a 'joke' cos we KNEW the network links with the old school influence.... its REAL! There's little trust over here for the judiciary!

[@rcninjastudio]

to me there's too many parts that were either took at face value, not gone into the full extent of the evidence or just blatantly ignored, the fact that the judge had an indirect link to AH should have been a huge red flag to start with as soon as evidence was being ignored

[@serenityb5816]

The judge protected his son, plain and simple. There’s a reason he didn’t recuse himself.

[@TheShedOccupant]

I struggle to believe anything that AH says, imo she couldn’t lie straight in bed! Her minions are going after anyone pro JD, it’s disgraceful

[@Asshole88]

Another 🐑 #JusticeForAmber

[@gail2485]

What a pity there was no jury for the UK trial. I think the judge’s decision was off.

[@ef1757]

Only in criminal cases would there be a jury. Since this was just a civil case, there was no need. The question is: how did it land on this specific judge’s lap? Hmmm… 🤔🧐

[@MO-mi6kw]

set up 2nd chanel on rumble as many are doing to show the bits youtube censors.

[@andreabruce5860]

There is information that AH is good friends with TMZ employee Matthew Weiss. They have been friends as far back as at least 2014.

[@ef1757]

That woman gets around but if she had a plan or was plotting or scheming, then she would have sought out key players a long time ahead. It was well-orchestrated but if Jerry Judge (JDs security) was alive (God rest his soul), I’m sure we would have heard a heck of a lot more! I wonder if he had advised Johnny to run run run! As far away from her.. Recall in one video (Australia finger event) he had said “we need someone STRONG to travel with her in case she kicked off.” That to me was telling.

[@tadpoleinnit2643]

Leaving aside everything else, I thought federal agencies such as US Internal Revenue, The US Department of Labor and The Office of Homeland Security were absolute sticklers for clerical probity and official procedure?

[@dandare1001]

It costs a lot of money to start looking into something like this, and the amount of money involved is too small, I suspect. The IRS have bigger fishes to fry.

[@tadpoleinnit2643]

@@dandare1001 ....yeah, I suspect it also depends on who you are and whether you've upset the wrong people in the Deep State.

[@Tracy_R]

I am beside myself. I don't understand how this judge looked at these issues? How he just looked past the truth or reality. I'm confused. The check was clearly made out as a "payment" for the work that she had done, whether the ex-assistant was fired or not, that holds truth. clearly AH has credibility issues when she clearly LIED to homeland security! AH lied about the dogs & was willing to throw anyone under the bus. AH acts like the law of the land does apply to HER! In my opinion a RETRIAL in UK has to be rehearsed! The audio should be held as TRUTH! AH LIED!

[@jeanniecorn2632]

i see Amber Heard has no Credibility from the day she meet Johnny , and i think the judge was a sleep and we need new judges for the law this not for the people and it not fine . thank you

[@Thea_MojaveOutliersWhipmakers]

I find now that I am very curious to know what other cases this UK judge has heard, and what the judgments are. Also, what does it mean when YT "restricts" a video?

[@nightsgrow6575]

I know right? The fact that he considers anyone testifying under oath to be credible because they’re under oath is …curious. I mean, JD was also under oath in the trial so why wasn’t his testimony equally as credible?

[@jesussaves7849]

@@nightsgrow6575 because he is a man. And they don’t think women can commit DV.

[@MsBabylove11]

Have you seen that eve Barlow is now trying to get you tubers like the umbrella guy shut down again? 🤬 stay safe because I really appreciate your perspective! ❤🇬🇧❤

[@markrobinson9394]

Eve Barlow is a hypocrite and only cares about free speech when it's in favour of the causes she supports. Otherwise, she blocks and calls for censorship to whatever opinion she doesn't agree with.

[@rozhector1361]

How come every bit of evidence or fact is disregarded by the judge. There is no way on earth JD could have won this so oneside case. The judge disregarded everything that was presented .

[@kimberley1449]

In my opinion anything even trivial things you lie about should have made her statements unreliable in the eyes of the courts!!

[@CJScrol]

It’s interesting to look at the maximum amount of effort AH applies to distort what’s real/true into “alternate versions” of any given event. Another point is that I am satisfied with the US jury’s verdict as a fair outcome for JD & for case law.

[@user-xs9js5oh9e]

I don't understand why she keeps getting away with breaking the law.

[@cynthiatucker2147]

It’s almost overwhelming that trouble and lies seem to follow Amber Heard wherever she goes. Australia with the dogs. The UK trial over the Sun. Of course, here in the USA. The fact that Johnny and Amber were bf & gf then they got married. I wonder were there any red alerts before their marriage? He should’ve listened to his daughter; well water under the bridge. Perhaps he fell into the trap thinking he could change her like so many women think about their intended spouses.

[@danfuntimes181]

Excellent content!

[@1977JohnBoy]

what does dan think about amber now or does he keep quiet about her now?

[@ludy41]

He seems to have had his tongue removed, whilst he has been in hiding.

[@jennym007]

The UK judges son had ties to the UK defendant...?!! CONFLICT OF INTEREST! He should never have tried the case.

[@rennegaukroger686]

The judge’s relationship (through his son) to the defendant (party) is at best unethical and at worst criminal. It doesn’t pass the smell test. Why didn’t he recuse himself? Aren’t there dozens of other judges that could or should have heard the case that didn’t have a stake in their son’s continued employment, earnings, and success? Is there a judiciary review or the like to look deeper into this judge’s motives; any new homes, large deposits, promotions for him or his son?

[@redlady120]

Thank you so much! was wondering what happened with it. and thank you for the upload.

[@ClairMbear]

This whole judgement is a stain on the UK legal system and needs to be reviewed, a KNOWN liar is given total credibility while more truthful people are dismissed, every judgement that MISJUSTICE Nichols ruled on needs to be reviewed as well as a full investigation into why he ruled this way in this case.

[@pb-c4904]

Spot on !!!🙏 It truly amazes me that this judge overlooked so much. A pretty face makes men overlook everything and sad to say that included JD. All your points to my mind were valid. Thank you

[@misty5979]

It figures. They won't limit the propaganda or hate groups & scams.......

[@simonfraser6365]

They claim to do both actually. in terms of "hate" groups youtube does immediately take these down when reported and verified.

[@DarkusZarvix]

It sounds like this trial needs to be redone somehow in the UK. There was so much that was lied about, and believed, by the judge. It sounds the judge read everything amber said as fact and wiggled through cracks to discount everyone speaking against her... God, this makes me mad no matter how many times I heard it. I'm glad VA got it right at least!

[@jaimeparedes9188]

Just listening to aforementioned facts makes me realize how off the judge was in the UK case.

[@rebeccahenderson7761]

Sign the petition to Appeal the UK trial.

[@WiscoGirl]

KZbin just loves to censor videos that don’t deserve it. Thanks for resharing!

[@janecarolineimlach]

If only some of the UK celebrities such as Rachel Riley would listen to your content or at least allow replies to the incessant Amber Heard support content they post. So enlightening as always from yourself. THANKYOU.

[@janecarolineimlach]

@Vintage Bollinger Absolutely However, having celebrity status allows privilege to reach a wider audience and therefore if the likes of Rachel Riley make comments in the public domain they should at best be informed and also have the decency to allow the public to reply and not block commentary. Ofcourse they should not have to put up with any abusive correspondence but to make misinformed public statements as a celebrity with a wide Reach and block responses is

[@janecarolineimlach]

In my opinion wrong

[@ef1757]

Methinks she has other (Russian/Ukraine) fish to fry! That is what she should be focussed on right now, not deflecting because of the JD-AH case.

[@sarahlogan942]

Yeah YT or ambers team who’s going round attacking many YT’s atm like TUG and Andy signore cos they’re not happy at those who speak the truth instead of spinning it ambers way

[@ianmacfarlane1241]

I don't know if it's possible for the UK case to be reopened with another judge, but there seems to be little doubt that something has gone awry with the UK trial. It's important to find out why the judge found in favour of Dan Wootton and News Group, as something appears to have gone very wrong.

[@sarahlogan942]

The uk judges decision wasn’t based on fact and we know that now and I sent you a video link the other day showing the links to both the judge and the sun and amber n the judge etc n there is plenty on Google too

[@RKP-hw5oj]

The Judge appeared to have decided the result very early on then tried to circumvent the evidence against AH’s credibility. The Judge’s approach was wholly unjust and I would say misconceived.

[@heatherb2762]

Another KZbinr found a peer review study of Amber’s credibility in the UK case: Assessment of Credibility of Testimony in Alleged Intimate Partner Violence: A Case Report. It is found on Taylor & Francis Online for the Journal of Forensic Psychology Realsearch and Practice. It would be interesting to see the study compared to your analysis.

[@sharonwilson8208]

Dr. Hughes's record after testimony...took a hit after testimony (not verdict) due to overwhelming gender bias. After verdict, she may have been a good doctor, but she is losing patients.

[@heatherb2762]

@@sharonwilson8208 the study does not pertain to Dr. Hughes. It is related to Amber and Johnny’s testimony/depositions in the UK case. I whole heartedly agree. Dr. Hughes may have been a good doctor at some point in her career, but she’s clearly lost all objectivity and sold her soul. IMO, the way she was preaching made me wonder how many men have been falsely accused and convicted based on her testimony and how she trains her “victim” clients. I believe she said she works cases where women have unalived their “abusers” and she testifies so they don’t get convicted. Scary AF!

[@carolynbriggs6972]

I read this paper. The journal is apparently a peer review journal. The author is an academic at a Swedish university. It’s quite a fascinating analysis. The author proposes a set of criteria for evaluating credibility, using this case as an example. Re : witnesses , Amber had 8 witness who were all related to her, or employed by or otherwise dependent on her. Johnny had 22 witnesses of whom only 7 were employed by or dependent on him. Yet the judge found her witnesses to be more credible.

[@alexstewart9747]

Shame on Judge Nicol and the UK Courts. This judgement needs throwing out.

[@tlevans62]

Totally agree with you. As a former Senior Constable of Police in Australia, it's my experience and opinion that the mear fact she admitted to illegally importing dogs into Australia, shows serious doubt on her credibility. The Judge made some bizarre choices in his rulings and some very odd assumptions. Amber was clearly involved in trying to get other witnesses to lie or misrepresent things in her favour. Her credibility is seriously in doubt and there's evidence to support that. He chose to disregard the evidence without rational justification.

[@karenlucas8882]

Your analysis of this is outstanding! I believe AH has always been a liar and compounds this in the dire consequences so many have and will continue to suffer until she is held accountable.

[@donnabarney1866]

Come on everybody, let's get signatures for the UK Apppeal on that Petition from Blackbelt Barrister!

[@marilyncalvert4143]

We are taught in our schools in the US that before you enter another country know the laws. It’s very clear to me and bring a resident of Texas Amber was not taught in her school to abide by these laws. Partial blame should go to the state of Texas.

[@bobimad]

beautifully explained and analyzed. based on the contradictions in the judges standards of evidence and witness evaluation, plus the personal connections you didnt go into, plus previous proved untruths stated by Heard in both US and Australia, how does the court of appeal justify refusing permission to appeal, putting aside the critical jury based judgement???? Personally i also think that such a legthy written judgement on this type of case, perhaps you can provide other examples, stinks of me thinks the lady protests too much! even on a cursory study the judges actions and points of view come across as biased, and not a little.

[@angelaclark129]

I agree with your very clear arguments, firstly that she was comfortable giving false statements to government agencies re the 'employment' of her assistant, she lied about the dept of agriculture documentation to import her dogs into Australia, and she bullied staff to falsify documents. Secondly re the taped arguments which the judge chose to dismiss, in which I agree very strongly (having been on the receiving end of many such arguments with my ex-husband) that the context and admissions are clear and obvious. Amber said she hit Johnny and that she started physical fights. To dismiss them because 'Amber gave away all the divorce settlement to charity and was clearly not a gold-digger' was as shocking to me on first reading as was the verdict of Justice Nicol at first hearing.

[@whathappenedtomyYThandle]

Have you ever been contacted by Dan Wooten regarding the SUN lawsuit in the UK? Just curious because at one point he seemed readily defensive toward anyone questioning the veracity of the decision or anything brought forth in reference to it. And very defensive of Amber Heard and anything she has to say. Thank You.

[@ef1757]

Maybe she slept with him too. Seems like that kinda girl who would sell her soul to the devil for wealth and fame nor matter the costs!

[@josieau]

I really wonder just what AH did to make the judge so blind…

[@ef1757]

She bedazzled and bewitched him with her love spells and charms.

[@josieau]

@@ef1757 I bet that’s not all she did.

[@captainsirjackchucklebutty6147]

So can the UK trial be summed up by saying AH did argue and get aggressive ,but because JD did react to that in a gentlemanly manner, JD did actually lay hand on Amber therefore is guilty as charged ? In other words , we mere men should hide on an island in the Bahamas until the hurricane has dissipated ....?

[@ef1757]

Yeah that sucks!

[@rethapretorius9860]

Paragraph 134 - In my opinion having had/not had contact with Kate J was irrelevant. AH tried in writing to convince another party to manufacture a lie involving an additional third party(Kate James). The one contemplating and frying to give life to this "lie" was AH.

[@bartdevos6291]

Is it possible that AH can het all audio sealed? So that in a possible appeal it can’t be used as evidence anymore?

[@emilala9049]

Sealed files can always be opened by a judge if they want them. So it would still be available as evidence. However as it's all been played so publicly and so many copies now exist, I'm pretty sure any judge would consider that point moot now, everyone has already heard and seen everything, there's no reason to seal it now as it wouldn't protect anyone's privacy anymore, which is why you seal things.

[@jesussaves7849]

@@emilala9049 in light that they disprove her credibility, I don’t think they can be sealed.

[@peterpauldonoghue7024]

Johnny should sue the UK Judges and the UK Government collectively- maybe he should take his case to the European Courts of civil rights?

[@SusanEmery2285]

I feel also this is a case of “damned fool Americans, going after a Great British newspaper”

[@ef1757]

@spoopymumma YES! Spot on!

[@kathyotoole4608]

A liar is a liar! I don’t know how the judge chose to ignore the fact that Amber lied to officials in Australia!! Amber has been caught straight out lying and the judge chose to overlook the entire thing!!

[@cooldad4]

The more you comment about this trial the more I feel our court's are so unjust and need a overhaul!

[@CJScrol]

In following what I hope will produce a fair resolution for JD, your analyses have been interesting. Thanks.