The Kawai has more warmth; although a few notes in the Yamaha mid register are slightly out of tune, it's got a crisper, more bell-like tone. Very sharp and precise. Don't confuse crispness with dynamic range; the Kawai is highly expressive! When I was younger I would have preferred the Yamaha, but my taste over the past decade has changed and I enjoy the richer, more complex tone of the Kawai. Some styles of music and individual pieces may be more forgiving of the Yamaha's crispness, but I think the Kawai is more suitable for a broader spectrum of genres. Will soon visit my local dealer and compare the actions. Hands down the tone winner for me is Kawai.
@guidodemarcoroma4 жыл бұрын
I tried Yamaha GC1 and the quality of sound to my ear was a little less rich than Kawai GL-30. However, the GL-30 is 166 cm whereas the GC1 is 161 cm. I also tried in a different showroom a GC2 that is 173 cm and it sounds was more powerful compared to GL-30. So I believe the sizes matter in these comparison, however, I really liked most the keyboard of GL-30, it is lighter and I prefer it over the Yamaha keyboards.
@damianwong7503 Жыл бұрын
Kawai GL-30 3:12 Yamaha GC1 4:25
@Max_sbk125 жыл бұрын
Kawai for classic music is the better!!
@pigramentebambino71174 жыл бұрын
I think the exact opposite...
@EveshkaGhost4 жыл бұрын
I favour the Kawai's over the Yamahas and I've been in the show room a few times there. At the moment they have this immense Yamaha which is voiced and regulated to perfection though. Also, a really nice Feurich. Kawais for me have the more classical sound. Yamahas usually (with the exception of a few) are a bit plain. Depends what you're after! Yamaha touch is amazing though. Can't deny that.
@benjaminsmith22875 жыл бұрын
I don't necessarily find the Yamaha more sparkly or brighter. I do find the Kawai lusher but that doesn't necessarily mean it's richer. Yamaha seems to go for clarity and evenness and subtlety where Kawai almost has more "body" in the sound although the tone is quite sweet. Excellent marques and both would make find practice instruments.
@rodrigofratin51414 жыл бұрын
Kawai is my choice!
@ian7574 жыл бұрын
Nice playing. 👌
@Kaitlynrenee784 жыл бұрын
I really expected to prefer the Yamaha. But the Kawai won me over
@seancregomusic3 жыл бұрын
I don't know why I prefer the sound of the shorter Kawai grands, but I always have. In every other brand, though, I can't handle anything under 6 feet. But with Kawai, even the GL20 and GL30 sound fabulous. My brain must be wired in a very strange way.
@kenpeters98073 жыл бұрын
Sean, you’re not alone. I found the sound of the two Kawai’s (20&30) to be fantastic. I’d ordered a GL20 (big price difference in the USA). Mid way, I went back and listened again. The GL-30 trumped them all - even 6’2” + in other brands. I’m not putting down the GL-20, as I said I had ordered it. We came into a little bit of more money and the GL-30 was more than worth it. I’m not sure of why the noticeable difference in only 3”. The KAWAI Indonesian factory supposedly mimics their Japanese factory. Maybe the artisans in Japan put in a bit more time -who knows. You certainly pay more. I like classical so KAWAI is it. But it sounds wonderful in most pop, rags, jazz and the like. Yamaha, I think, has the edge in a lot of pop and more modern music. If you offered me either for a very low price, I would take it.
@titob.yotokojr.93373 жыл бұрын
Both are very good pianos but I prefer the lushness of the Kawai in this video, particularly the lower range of the Kawai.
@IamKonstantin4 жыл бұрын
Definitely the kawai :-)
@DavidIzquierdoAzzouz5 жыл бұрын
I'm sure both actions are delightful, although I clearly like how Kawai sounded here rather than the Yamaha. For me Kawai sounded full and woody, while the Yamaha was lacking a bit of presence, just a thought.
@beback_4 жыл бұрын
Both are beautiful but are you sure you're Yamaha is tuned?
@dchrzescijanek4 жыл бұрын
Yes, it's in unwell tempered :D
@markE9464 жыл бұрын
It's slightly out of tune
@markE9464 жыл бұрын
The yahama seems slightly out of tune, but my ears are accustomed to their digital piano range not wooden acoustic pianos that require regular tuning
@rhondaleavitt34564 жыл бұрын
What is the name of the second song you played? I would love to learn it.
@beback_4 жыл бұрын
Chopin's Nocturne Opus 1 No 2 in B flat minor! kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKWsiGWoZqqUoq8
@tm.anwarianwari81074 жыл бұрын
Chopin nocturne op9 no1
@pian0gao4 жыл бұрын
What was the name of the1st piece he played? Beautiful
@elias77485 жыл бұрын
Kawai definitely got a much more powerful sound which I'm a fan of
Not a completely fair comparison as the Kawai, although not brilliantly tuned, is rather better tuned than the Yamaha.
@mikeyshanghai98014 жыл бұрын
Kawai has brighter more crisp notes while Yamaha seems to be more mellow and more depth in its tone.
@shanshanliu84454 жыл бұрын
I agree with you.
@benjaminsmith22874 жыл бұрын
@@davidalarconquinones87 Interesting. I found the Yamaha significantly more mellow and almost to the point that I thought the Yamaha was overly subdued, especially in the treble.
@benjaminsmith22873 жыл бұрын
That's what I heard as well. I didn't hear Yamaha as bright or sparkly at all. It almost seemed restrained and certainly mellow. It also has less body but not necessarily less richness. But the singing tone is almost a talking tone in the Yamaha. The Kawai seemed to have an "oing" to its tone but if you go to the Yamaha CX, they do as well.
@gustavogo2915 Жыл бұрын
@@benjaminsmith2287 🤡
@africanhistory3 жыл бұрын
yamaha wins for me. If you were recording each piano would fit different songs
@Yussnan84.4 жыл бұрын
The Yamaha sounds better.
@CaptJackAubreyOfTheRoyalNavy3 жыл бұрын
Kawai sounds more rich.
@ianreed76055 жыл бұрын
Yamaha sounded nicer to me
@JD-kf2ki5 жыл бұрын
Nah, Kawai.
@benjaminsmith22874 жыл бұрын
@@JD-kf2ki He did say "to me" We all have different preferences.