These 4 MYTHS About the Bible have been Proven WRONG

[@wennemalino9013]

I believe when isaiah prophesied about Babylon, he by the Spirit also referred to the spiritual rulers & principalities over Babylon in the spiritual realm. This i believe is the pattern in most of the Bible prophecies. They refer to the physical & factual, also to the unseen realm behind the curtain for that particular subject

[@shawnglass108]

This is absolutely true and is the way prophecy was understood and presented in the New Testament. This is the only way you can truly understand the prophecies shared by Matthew. He shares prophesies that came true in their day yet were not fully realized until Christ fulfilled/fulfills them. The view of many modern Bible students is that prophesy is only literal and is only relevant for the single event of its day. This is absolutely not true as Matthew and the other NT authors teach us. The prophesies were an example of Christ. Just as many Bible Characters, like Moses, were an example, or type, of Christ.

[@cc3775]

Nope

[@shawnglass108]

@@cc3775 , such a deep answer. I’m surprised you had time to think of it.

[@shawnglass108]

Some people are a little too simple to understand this. The way Matthew uses prophecy should make it clear to people who actually study the way prophecy was taught and believed in early Judaism.

[@cc3775]

@@shawnglass108 I don’t need to give a deep answer. I just stated the truth.

[@e12agent]

About Isaiah's prophecy, there may be a context that this prophecy was directed to a king, but it goes much deeper, it's directed to the spirit that was acting through him. No man could ever fall from heavens, but we all know who fell

[@Jdogg0311]

Its directed past the king to the evil one who fell like lightning and is the one who has influenced all the nations to do evil and rebel against God. It’s pretty clear to me. I don’t understand why ppl like Brandon do this and are so sure about it when it’s heresy.

[@Existentialkev]

It's called a metaphor. He is speaking about the king falling from the heights of his hubris. The word Lucifer is Greek and the book of Isaiah was written in Hebrew. This is clearly something that was misinterpreted when the Greek translation was made

[@Esbamken]

@Existentialkev thanks goodness ,the misinterpretation makes the massage clearer, it's directed spiritually at satan

[@Jdogg0311]

The seventy-two returned with joy, saying, “Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your name!” And he said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you. Nevertheless, do not rejoice in this, that the spirits are subject to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.” In that same hour he rejoiced in the Holy Spirit and said, “I thank you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and understanding and revealed them to little children; yes, Father, for such was your gracious will.” ‭‭Luke‬ ‭10‬:‭17‬-‭21‬ ‭ESV‬‬

[@gmork1090]

@@Jdogg0311 Satan fell, but Isaiah is talking about a king. The being we think of as Lucifer does exist, but maybe not as Isaiah describes. There are angelic beings given the job of deceivers, but apparently, one of them (a certain cherub according to Ezekiel) went way too far and is now considered the enemy, the dragon, current ruler of earth.

[@marybrewer2203]

My personal problem is that when I learn the truth about certain scriptures, I make the mistake of trying to correct people, instead of allowing the Lord to do His work. I want to keep learning, but also to walk in love.

[@ooze4472]

Engaging in the correction of Exegetical inaccuracies is justifiable, provided it is executed with a compassionate demeanor and a commitment to walk i the Spirit. Our responsibility to uphold truth mandates a courageous defense, even when met with resistance or aversion. Our corrective efforts manifest an authentic concern for the individual undergoing correction. This demonstration of care is rooted in a sincere commitment to fostering intellectual growth and ensuring the integrity of scholarly discourse and the respect of context.

[@tomgregory687]

The problem is that if we didn’t correct people there would be thousands of denominations. Oh wait, there are! Just speak the truth in love. (Ephesians 4:15)

[@shawnglass108]

Share your opinion in love and you can have peace in sharing it. Do not let Satan silence you from sharing what God has revealed to you as truth.

[@BelindaM44]

There is nothing wrong with you directing them to truth. God expects us and encourages us to tell truth. You can do that in a loving way by simply explaining how you learned what specific words mean regarding the original language.

[@Marialla.]

The right question is: How would you feel if someone approached you that way, with what THEY thought of as truth, if you didn't agree? Try to be the person you wish THAT person would be.

[@Jdogg0311]

The seventy-two returned with joy, saying, “Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your name!” And he said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven. Behold, I have given you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall hurt you. Nevertheless, do not rejoice in this, that the spirits are subject to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven.” ‭‭Luke‬ ‭10‬:‭17‬-‭20‬ ‭ESV‬‬

[@theMolluskMan]

Lots of things fall from heaven in the text of scripture. What makes you think there’s a correlation?

[@amamamia4391]

With that context maybe it should read "And I saw Satans' fall, like lightning from heaven.

[@180fJC]

The Greek word used there is satanas as well, which has its root from the word satan.

[@AnthonyJ-ji8dg]

And Lucifer name means light bringer or morning star

[@γένεσις-ο9ψ]

The SUN (son of the MOURNING aka dawn/morning) is a STAR as Lucifer was considered a fallen angel/star aka the son of god.

[@travissizer9578]

The best description of 'Satan' or 'Lucifer' is best told in Ecclesiastes, when the teacher calls him the Adversary. So, I started sticking with calling that evil, or the snake, or lucifer, or satan as The Adversary.

[@dominicpardo4783]

*ZERO EVIDENCE THAT SATAN EXISTS*

[@kadmow]

- I think you are reading something into Ecclesiastes - that is not in the versions I have read ??? Satan - rather satan, is a common masculin noun (Hebrew and Greek are gendered languages) denoting an (or "the" if one must use the definite article) adversary, one who withstands (personal, national or figurative). ( even God, or an Angel of God, when he stands in opposition). NB: the common word for enemy in hebrew (oyeb) has its root in "ayab" - indicating "to hate" or have "enmity against".... Ecc 12:13 The conclusion, when everything has been heard, is: fear God and keep His commandments, because this applies to every person. Ecc 12:14 For God will bring every act to judgment, everything which is hidden, whether it is good or evil.

[@McDLea62USA]

Great video, Brandon! Thank you for all your efforts to create these videos!

[@MattSmith-6868]

I really enjoy your videos! Thank you for helping us gain deeper understanding of His word

[@sherrygodwin4162]

Thank you from me also! 😅

[@billygoat5091]

Thanks ,that is something I learned and now had reinforced by you. We are taught to "never go beyond what is written" but many do just that.(1 Cor 4:6)

[@kadmow]

- and it seems that many church teachings incorporate human philosophy - "puffed up" interpretations and suppositions, using Jewish superstition and Greek mystic and metaphysical understandings - -going well beyond the Faith of Abraham. We shouldn't be arrogant to one another.

[@MrLastname-g3d]

That's a fact ​@@kadmow

[@carriewilloughby3806]

I love that he encourages you to check the Hebrew words and how it's translated. Also its little details that can make a big change. It's GOD'S word who are we to change even a little detail.

[@KennyIsbell]

Hello how are you feeling today and how's the weather condition over there today?

[@ROCKIN-AL]

It's NOT misinformation, it's MISINTERPRETATION

[@dc8617]

Many Mansions - My Sister when She was young use to live with my Grandmother who was a Godly woman and studied scripture day and night. When visiting Her as you entered into Her house you could feel the presence of the Lord all around. One night my Sister was woken. My Sister knew something was wrong. She went to see my Grandmother. My Grandmother was not breathing, my Sister knew the Lord had taken Her. My Sister fell to Her knees and Cried out to Our Lord. Minutes of praying had passed. Then my Grandmother took a deep breath. She turned to my Sister and told Her the Lord came and showed Her many things. She even seen Her family and greeted them. The Lord took Her to this Mansion, My Grandmother said it was so big with giant Pillars outside, precious stones and the floor was made of Gold so pure it was like glass. The Lord lead Her to the Door which was not like anything She had seen on Earth. The colours were so bright. She asked the Lord if this was His palace, and the Lord replied that this was Her Mansion. 1 Corinthians 2:9 9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.

[@martinsolomon5500]

Sounds cold and empty. Who would want their own mansion. Lonely. 😢

[@dimariobell8499]

What a beautiful testimony

[@margueritestafford2713]

Thanks for your studies to make me more aware of the Biblical translations🙏🏻

[@CheckmateSurvivor]

This guy is a globalist puppet.

[@IAMJ1B]

He is a false teacher 😂

[@Uncanny_Mountain]

​@@IAMJ1BWhich is why it is said so by a man's own lips alone only is he so judged, and for the Wage of Sin is Israel The Angel of Death

[@KennyIsbell]

Hello how are you feeling today and how's the weather condition over there today?

[@authorjosephtruitt]

Great work, Brandon! The is much freedom in breaking the chains of our preconceived ideas and things we've been taught in the past. We should all challenge ourselves to get back to the original texts to gain a deeper understanding of the scriptures. Keep it up!

[@wordsofourtestimony6390]

Amen!

[@JimRPickens]

I think it would be a good idea to also read what the Church fathers said in their sermons and in their writings about the Holy scriptures. They lived much closer to the times and culture when these events were happening and a few even knew the apostles. What has amazed me is that many forget that Christianity has been around for two millennia and totally ignore anything written, explained or taught from the close of revelation to the present times.

[@mytwocentsworth]

I had come to the same conclusions as you Brandon, so good to hear my conclusions confirmed!

[@AlphaProto]

In Renaissance art the forbidden fruit was shown as an apple. This is a great example of how media can distort people's knowledge of the bible. That's why it is best to read things for yourself instead of relying on media for your theology. Also a good example of the second commandment and not making images of God.

[@perfectpeace00]

You mean 2nd commandment

[@AlphaProto]

@@perfectpeace00 thank you. I've been watching too much news, heh. I'll edit that.

[@Marialla.]

The apple in artwork isn't accidental. It's a symbol that people of that time would recognize, though people today don't get the reference. It means sex. Original sin used to be thought of as sex, which is why Eve is shown offering the apple in such a seductive way, and why it is said that all humans are born under original sin. Even sex in marriage wasn't considered pure, though it was allowable. It was said by some that "God left the room" when a married couple had sex, and therefore they were in danger of being caught by the Devil at that time. I believe a terrible injustice is done in many of those paintings when the Serpent is portrayed as a female naga, or half-woman half-snake. It is an attempt to thrust all blame for the sin onto women in general, and portray Adam as a helpless victim of their wiles. My understanding of the original story, however, is that the serpent is only written in as a metaphor for the snake a man carries with him in his trousers. It "talks" not with words but with urges and temptation nevertheless. It urges folks to "taste of the apple". But once people give in to that temptation they are expelled from the Garden of Eden, which is innocence, and must take up adult responsibilities such as childbirth and working in the fields. The whole story was once just a myth about growing up. People who take the Bible too literally cannot see that metaphor.

[@ThaDogfather_YT]

​@Marialla. That is a great metaphor, although when reading scripture it wouldnt make sense because God gave Adam and eve the command to "be fruitful and become many/ or Multiply fill the earth and subdue it...." Genesis 1:28 and this is before they sinned so context tells us it was definitely NOT the original sin, as it was God's plan for the man and his wife.

[@Marialla.]

@@ThaDogfather_YT The "be fruitful and multiply" thing was the ending of the previous myth about creation. Kind of like "and they lived happily ever after". The myth about the Garden of Eden is a separate tale. Genesis is a collection of several stories mishmashed together. That's why you have two separate creation accounts, with things attributed to being created on different days. It's not literal.

[@lancemoyer5156]

This is right on, if you read around it you will see . Thanks for showing me stuff I thought was not exactly correct in so many videos. Not that what I thought was bad but your teachings help it make more sense !

[@KennyIsbell]

Hello how are you feeling today and how's the weather condition over there today?

[@davidchalona6494]

I fight this battle with believers and non-believers. I tell them all to just read the Bible.

[@antoniocoburn-sl4kl]

That’s what we have to do, in order for us to be approved by God.

[@antoniocoburn-sl4kl]

@stizelswik3694 Amen!!

[@uncle_Samssubjects]

​@stizelswik3694 unless you read my book, and quote from it, you have no life in you..

[@_Love.Light.Africa]

This is a lie.@@uncle_Samssubjects

[@josephcelestine1945]

I have read the bible and it's full of so many errors, I can sit with you and prove them all, and you would still argue with no logic at all, and tell me I would be wrong, despite having done the work for 3 decades.

[@JesFos]

This ☝🏻 is why I keep questioning it all. The more I research, the more I follow what feels right (intuition) the better I feel about my faith & closer I feel to Yhwh

[@olivianatwick7603]

Once again I say Amen brother. You need to continue to preach that we do not read the Bible incorrectly and this leads to misunderstandings and if I may say so bad theology. I see so many Christian preachers today that seemingly have bad Theology and I am very upset and disappointed in this.

[@IAMJ1B]

U appreciating a false teacher😂 So are u agreeing too satan didn't fall sky. Then explain luke 10:18verse Jesus says about satan fall from sky

[@olivianatwick7603]

@@IAMJ1B you misread what I said.

[@IAMJ1B]

@@olivianatwick7603 U appreciated a false teàcher about truth seeking. And i am not wrong about u

[@olivianatwick7603]

@@IAMJ1B you know I'm not going to engage with you in this. I went to Seminary I graduated from Seminary I was a minister for over 30 years I know what I'm talking about so please hold your peace

[@IAMJ1B]

@@olivianatwick7603 U pick pocketing urself. Try to prove me wrong. And u will seek the truth

[@MrSwhorfe]

Thanks much for the eye opening.

[@donnastorey3830]

Thank you for clearing up the myths. This is very interesting.

[@IAMJ1B]

He is a liar. So are u agreeing satan didn't fall sky. Then explain luke 10:18verse where Jesus says about satan fall from sky

[@RobertBrayley]

I agree ronbianco...the passage starts off speaking of the king of Babylon, and in verse 12 we see a shift in Isaiah's thoughts. He starts writing about the spirit behind the king. The king never was in heaven to fall from heaven. We see a similar thing in Ezekiel 28 starting in verse 11. He was first talking about the king of Tyre, then started talking about the spirit influencing the king. Verse 13...I'm sure the king of Tyre had never set foot in the garden of Eden. And we know this verse is not talking about Adam or Eve. One of Satan's moves in these latter days is to try and remove himself from scripture so we eventually don't believe his existence. "Hath God said?"

[@SavedByJesus-pi3yu]

This comment should be pinned and have more likes! You hit the nail on the head. I was trying to explain it correctly and you did it perfectly

[@crystalsea72]

You said this much more thoroughly than I could have.

[@jonathanrobertson3406]

Exactly. And this is how a great many of of the most esteemed bible scholars see it.

[@markbcrich]

Regarding Ezekiel 28:13, Ezekiel is comparing Tyre to Eden when he suggests the King was in Eden. Not sure how you are tying Satan in to this again. Satan is never mentioned in the book of Genesis either.

[@jamespittsfordiii7632]

Maybe you can correct my understanding in this thought, several verses in the Bible have dual meaning and can be understood to cover two instances in one text. Moses made a bronze serpant which he placed upon a pole so the Israelites who had been bitten by vipers might be healed. This also was symbology of how the Son of Man would be raised up.

[@ritabrandow1318]

100 💯 percent right ✅️

[@kadmow]

- ie Jesus details and makes the connection with Moses - John 3:4 - and John 8:28, contrasting to "established Judaism" John 12:34.. (ie. Jesus was teaching from the Torah and Mishnah things very different to the established Rabbis) Judaism in Jesus' time was not the faith of Abraham and Moses. Just as much of Christianity in our day is not the teaching of Jesus. - nor the biblical record. - of course the original story was back in Num 21:8-9

[@lionzion1879]

Well, some gnostic text would suggest that maybe Jesus was the serpent that brought knowledge to humans and the evil God was actually the God of creation and the God of the old testament. He brought knowledge that only was given to him. this was indicated In the gospels of John. Maybe this two Gods were different.

[@kinglee2659]

Thank you brother, amazing how God brings this knowledge to us to feed our wisdom and understanding of his Word. Praise God❤

[@bukharagunboat8466]

The name Lucifer in Isa 14 originates in the Latin bible; it's a poetic term for the planet Venus (the morning star). The KJV translators ported the word across into English.

[@IMKSURVIVOR]

God never made planets, only the flat earth with the sun n moon under the firmament!! It's does say "Lucifer is the ruler of this world!

[@e.m.8094]

It was translated by Jerome.

[@bukharagunboat8466]

@@e.m.8094 True, Jerome used Lucifer, which to him simply meant the planet Venus. Wycliffe left the word unchanged in his English translation of the Vulgate. The Geneva Bible also used the word, but a marginal note shows that the translators were aware that it was simply a term for the planet Venus, with which the king of Babylon, Nebuchadnezzar, was being compared.

[@wendellhoward884]

Brandon. I love your podcast. It has changed my life. Unfortunately I see some negative comments. With all respect to these brothers and sisters, even Jesus couldn’t satisfy all of his listeners. Continue putting out content, following the lead of prayer and the Holy Spirit.

[@Friedbrain11]

Without the knowledge of how the people lived back then there is a lot of misconceptions as to what is meant. It is why I want a true translation of the Bible which I am still looking for.

[@JSnyder3333]

Try the Cepher or the HalleluYAH Scriptures for greater accuracy. Or use an interlinear Bible with a Strong’s for deeper understanding.

[@oneminutereviews25]

Good stuff man

[@WendyMedcalf-sk3yv]

Thank you so much for these videos. I always walk away from them with a deeper insight which helps my bible study. I would love it if you could do a segment on the meaning of some of the parables that Jesus taught. I sometimes feel like the depiction of the disciples in The Chosen when they tell Jesus they don't quite get his meaning.

[@Uncanny_Mountain]

Pythagoras means Heart of the Serpent, he was born in Sidon, a fishing Port in Phoenicia. His mother recieved a message from the Oracle of Delphi that he would become a great Leader and Teacher. Sidon means Kingdom of the Fish, and the Essenes, who wrote the Dead Sea scrolls, worshipped Pythagoras. The Sarcophagus of Eschmun III found in Sidon names him as the Widow's Scion, aka Hiram Abiff, the Founder of Freemasonry, of which Tyre was the premier Capital (at least equal to Thebes). In 911BC Rameses II married the Queen of Sidon, home of Jezebel (Daughter or consort of Baal, basically "Queen") founding Neo Assyrian Babylon, an alliance between Egypt and Hiram, father of Jezebel and King of Assyria, and Egypt, forming the Phoenician colonies and building the first Temple of Melqart to commemorate the alliance. The Si in Sidon is the basis of the Latin Exe, or X, and is the basis of the Cross, or Chi Rho that Constantine painted on his shields. Also known as the Cross of Tyre, or Cross of Baal, being Ra-El, or Ba'El. Oddly enough irrational numbers can also be mapped using Euler's number, producing a Templar Cross in the process. This cross can also be seen around the neck of Nimrod in Assyria, and is consistent with the Union Jack, and Solstice Calendar found in the Vatican Shiva Lingam. Shiva is the Hebrew word for 7, their culture also found its way to Japan (via the Phillipines) ultimately becoming Shintoism. It was the Phoenicians who gave their name to the Pole Star, which they used to Navigate the Oceans using the Zodiac, thats what the Antikythera mechanism was for, and with it they wrote the Byblos Baal, what we now call the Bible. The first form of the Bible was written in 325BC and called the Vaticanus Greacus, or Son of the Sacred Serpent, a reference to Sirius, the basis of the Sothic Calendar, which uses a Hexidecimal or base 60 system found in all the Megalithic sites around the world. In the second century AD astronomer Valentinus Vettori transcribed it into a Lunar chart of 13 houses, what we now call the Zodiac. Horoscope means Star Watcher, and the Phoenician word for Saturn, or El, was Israel or El, (Fruit) of Isis and Ra. El is the primary God of the Phoenicians, representing the offspring of Egypt, and his consort Astarte represents the Assyrian half of the alliance. It may be possible to trace lineages and alliances through the naming of gods, which can be traced all the way to Ireland and the Vikings, and to Indonesia and the Americas, even as far away as New Zealand and Australia. It denotes Sirius as Son of Orion and Pleaides, which sits at 33 degrees of the Zodiac. The basis of the Sothic (dir Seth) Calendar of the Egyptians. The New Moon in this position marks Rosh Hashanah, the Egyptian, Celtic, Phoenician, and Assyrian New Year, the first New Moon of September, which is called September because it's the 7th House of the Zodiac, when the Sun is in Ophiuchus. The Phoenix, Benben, or Bennu is the Egyptian word for Heron, a Feathered 'Serpent'. It baptised itself in frankincense and myrrh at BaalBek, and then alights atop the Pyramid, upon the Holy Grail, or Alter of Ra every 630 years to take three days off the calendar during the course of the first New Moon of Nisan, which means "Prince". The Capstone of Pyramids is even called the Benben or Bennu. The Phoenix is found in all religions, which are all Astrological Allegory for the Moon travelling through the Constellations, as a soul migrating from body to body, this is the basis of Joseph Campbell's Monomyth, or the Hero's Journey. The various planets no doubt play their own roles as portents, omens, and aspects, this astrology is the science of the Bronze age, and lasted all the way up to the 20th Century. Resurrection was an early teaching of the Christian Church, and likely relates to the lineage of Kings (The King is Dead, long live the King.) Phoenicians represent the interim step between Egypt and Greece, their artisans and culture exceeding that of the Greeks, who literally adopted the Phoenician Alphabet, which we still use to this day, sounding out words phonetically. Phoenician is aliiterated in Venetian, and Vikings, being Kings of the Sea. The Bennu is the Egyptian Phoenix, to Phoenicians the Hoyle, no different to the traditions of the Etruscans, who saw birds as sacred, just as the Celts. Hebrew and Iber as in Iberia have the same root meaning over, as in overseas, as in those who travel "over the sea." A colony called Iberia also appears on the Eastern shores of the Black Sea, where the same Dolmens and Megalithic culture originating in Ireland and Brittany appeared circa 4500BC. _Phoenician_ means Scions of the Phoenix, the first Bible: Vaticanus Greacus Son of the Sacred Serpent (Prince). Then there's the Essenes, Sons of Light, the Tuatha De Danaan, Sons of Light, Annunaki, Sons of Light, Arthur Pendragon means Arthur Son of the dragon, Chertoff is Russian for "Son of the Devil" and Dracula also means Son of the Dragon, Masons have been known at times to call themselves the "Brotherhood of the Great White Serpent". The Ziggurat of Anu also denotes her as a great white Serpent, while New Grange and the Bru na Boinne in Ireland (4000BC) coated buildings with white quartz to denote the Moon. The Moon itself travels outside the Solar Elliptic by 5 degrees, which means it passes through specific constellations in a serpentine fashion that is always changing, but repeats every 19 years, the time it took to train a Druid or Magi, Magi meaning "Teacher" the Phoenix is also associated with this sacred number 19. The name "Pharoah" means "Great House" or "House of Light" and Cairo used to be called Babel. Pharaoh's themselves wore a hooded crown representing feathers, just as Native American Chiefs, ie the Feathered Serpent, they were also called the Commander in Chief. Aztecs also had Serpent Kings, (Canaan means Serpent Kings, and Sidon was a Son of Canaan, and Great Grandson of Noah) who were called to lead with cunning and guile, being the very virtue by which they claim the title in the first place; but to be seen in public as just and diplomatic. "As wise as Serpents, but gentle as Doves" the old Egyptian flag of an Eagle attacking a Snake is also reflected in the Modern Mexican flag, denoting the Constellations of Serpentis (13th sign of the Zodiac) and Aquila. The dimensions and 12 mathematical constants of the Great Pyramid are also expressed in New Grange, and Stonehenge, as well as in Watson Brake, (2500BC) and Teotihuacan, which correlates to the Phoenician/ Sumerian Hexidecimal system, which is what our modern systems of time are based on. Officially no one knows who invented astrology, the zodiac, navigation by the stars, and time keeping. But whoever built the pyramids, and pioneered the 24hr clock in Egypt 5000 years ago also knew the exact dimensions of the Earth, as well as the speed of light. These calculations can all be made using these Megalithic sites as surveyors use a theodolite. Specifically Teotihuacan, which sits 180 degrees opposite Cairo, and has the exact same footprint. The ideal positions to determine the speed of light using the transit of Venus, by which one can accurately determine Longitude for navigation. Capt cook did the same thing in 1774 when he 'discovered' Easter Island. The only culture that fits the bill was wiped out "not one stone upon the other" by the Romans in 146BC. Tyre, the capital of Phoenicia (israel) sat just offshore from Ur Shalom, City of the New Moon, or City of Peace. The root of the name Jerusalem, and was also seized by Rome in 70AD after a 13 year seige. The gap between is 216 years. Greek Dionysians built the Temple of Solomon (now called the Temple of Melqart) representing the Solar Lunar Metonic Calendar on which this system is based, they also carried mirrors, a practice associated with both the Magi and the Druids as well as Greek and Egyptian scholars, these Mirrors are Astrological charts called "Cycladian Frying Pans" and record the cycles of the planets. The first Temple of Melqart (the Phoenician form of Horus, or Hercules, or Pan, or Thor) representing the 13th Constellation of Ophiuchus or the Serpent Bearer (hence Orphic Serpent worship) had pillars of Emerald and Gold, representing Isis and Osiris. The Jerusalem Temple only took payment in "Shekels of Tyre" a currency minted during the Jewish rebellion against Rome. "Give that which is Ceasar's unto Ceasar" When Alexander sacked Tyre in 332BC they moved to Carthage meaning "New City" or New Jerusalem, where they built a second temple with Pillars of Bronze. Nebuchadnezzar also seiged Tyre for 13 years, taking the City captive in 573BC: the same time as the biblical account of the Jews. And again in 70AD after a three and a half year seige, also consistent with biblical accounts. Esus was a character created by Joseph of Arimathea, who was a Celt, the King of Tyre, the Bible is the Phoenician Almanac, Esus the God of Death, Polaris, the Pole Star. It's written backwards, in a mirror, just as Egyptians made their astrological records, the Zodiac. Palestinians are the Seed of Abraham, the Phoenicians, Sons of the Father, the Phoenix, the direct line of Pharoahs of Egypt, and their Messiah calls to them from New Zealand, their Promised Land! And in fulfillment of the Covenant that was made.

[@jorgeabuauad]

No pure de gnostic propaganda, Pythagoras was a Satanist , the zodiac come from hell and all the pagans serpent are demons . The pyramid are satanic temple satanic rituals and mason are just the satanic Templar .

[@tollaserfontein642]

And you honestly believe all this hogwash?

[@jorgeabuauad]

@@tollaserfontein642 is gnostic satanism .

[@joshuacromley7439]

​@@tollaserfontein642 appeal to ridicule fallacy reflects the duality of a disconnected circuit

[@bugler75]

Some extremely tenuous connections are being made here. However, I would like to read the evidence that supports the original poster’s ideas. Otherwise I will read the story of The Three Little Pigs and have more faith in that.

[@JoyOfTheLORD.]

My goodness, 7:05 the LORD blessed me with a revelation through this. glory to the Lamb of God

[@dawnbassey5630]

you will not believe how the last 2 years have been to show people from scriptures that contextual reading of Isaiah and Ezekiel does not give the history/fall of Satan and that Lucifer is not his former name. The thing is that many churchgoers are so deeply rooted in church tradition that it clouds their reading culture. They approach the bible with pre-conceived ideas and that is very fearful, to say the least.

[@ooze4472]

Amen! That theological notion in question appears to have drawn inspiration from the apocalyptic Jewish literature, commonly known as pseudepigrapha, particularly 1 Enoch. These texts held significant popularity during the 1st century. It is noteworthy that despite the prevalence of themes in apocalyptic literature, including 1 Enoch, the specific claim associating Isaiah 14 with the word "Helel" as Satan does not seem to find explicit mention within these sources. The development of this specific interpretation gained prominence notably with Origen and further solidified with the Latin Vulgate translation by St. Jerome in the late 4th century. Recognizing the historical context provides valuable insights into the evolution of theological perspectives surrounding this matter. A nuanced exploration of the historical and literary context enhances our understanding of these theological perspectives prevalent during the time. It is imperative to underscore the paramount significance of context within Scripture.

[@IAMJ1B]

So are u agreeing satan didn't fall sky? Then explain luke 10:18verse Jesus says about satan fell from sky

[@dawnbassey5630]

@@IAMJ1B was Jesus speaking of a near past event or far past (pre-historic) event? I think He was talking about the spiritual implications of what they were just sent out to do. Note that "Satan" means the opposer

[@IAMJ1B]

@@dawnbassey5630 No He "saw"! past.

[@BenWilliams7]

@@IAMJ1B Well, we might consider it this way... that we can overcome the power of Satan by the power of God Most High. :) verse 19: “...I give unto you power... over ALL the power of the enemy...” verse 20: “...in this rejoice not, that the spirits are subject unto you...” Acts 26:18: “To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.” Revelation 11:15: “...The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our LORD, and of HIS Christ; and HE shall reign for ever and ever.”

[@ruflcupter5]

Brother, most of my misinformation is mistranslation. Most of the bible stories I had grown up with need relearned. The Bible is becoming a new book.

[@trafficjon400]

?

[@kimberlyboldt5213]

Thanks, Brandon. I agree about Isaiah. Chapter 14, it's clear, "prophecy unto the King of Babylon." And God is being sarcastic. It has nothing to do with Satan. Unfortunately, people won't let go of "the traditions of men."

[@ceciliasteinmacher809]

Thank you Brandon.Ive listened to you a bit on You Tube very informative.We had gone over some of the same info with the same conclusion It's amazing well things can be misinterpreted by going from one language and culture to another As well as sometimes that culture not having a word to explain the context of another

[@ronbianco5919]

Sorry Brandon, but no, the Isaiah verses do refer to our adversary AND they refer to the Babylonian king. as do most prophecies, There are both near and far interpretations. I’m sorry that this is the road you have chosen to take lately. I have been following your ministry for about 2 to 3 years during this pandemic, and most certainly ever since The Chosen has come to fame. Mostly your messages have been uplifting. I’m not certain if you can see this, but the click baiting of these recent messages have been to sow a lack of confidence in our understanding of God’s word. it is one thing if the things you’re bringing to our attention are doctoral issues, but it is a far different thing when it comes to picking at words, does it really impact anybody’s doctoral position if it’s an apple or not? I’ve never thought it to be an apple. I’ve actually thought it to be a fig, but it’s immaterial. I’ve never thought the snake was crawling on belly when it tempted Eve. I have always figured it was a consequence of after the curse, but what of it? Is my theology off because of it? I encourage you to please return to using your discerning gifts to encourage and build up the body and improve our understanding of the Word, but not just nit pick at words that do not impact our doctrinal understanding.

[@Lola-eh9cp]

❤❤

[@Baltamore.the.chosen.]

I knew there was something very different from this guy. Heretic just like td jakes Joyce Meyer and Joel olsteen. The spirit of God has been telling me to stay away..!!

[@majormayco]

I've told him that a million times. His arguments are empty, lack depth and cannot build anyone. That's what happens when one is full of irrelevant bible arguments but has no revelation of the word of God or any insight from the Holy Spirit.

[@splendidarc1402]

To be fair and give the benefit of doubt, is it such a bad thing to teach new Christians or Christians who don't know that it wasn't an apple, or that Satan means adversary and is not the name of the enemy but a title? Whilst I do see your point, that these aren't really building up perhaps the goal isn't always to build, but to inform. To pick up a metaphor used by Paul, a teacher can't always give meat, sometimes a Christian isn't ready for meat but instead needs more milk. Perhaps I do not see as you do, but I do propose that it isn't as bad as you seem to be making it out to be. In love and faith

[@Ian_622]

If you start saying things, like Isaiah are dual fulfillment, prophecies, you could do that with anything. The passage is an astronomical metaphor about the king of Babylon using the planet Venus. If you’ve done any observations of the Night Sky, you will notice that the planets such as Mars, Jupiter and Saturn always appear at the zenith of the heavens. Well, Venus is always lowest in the sky. Additionally, you have shemyaza who led the rebellion against the Yahweh in the book of Enoch and he and his friends mated with human women and produced Giants and Nephilim offspring. There was also another angel that fell called azazel. And he taught mankind warfare and women make up and stuff like that. So which one of those are Satan? Oh wait a minute you don’t believe that the book of Enoch is inspired Scripture do you do you see how we can play games and decide whatever we want? Plus in the book of Job Yahweh literally makes a bet with Satan on the faith of the prophet Job. If you read the entire narrative, Satan is under the complete authority of Yahweh, and is only allowed to do to Job as Yahweh permits

[@charmainedoherty6064]

Thanks for these clarifications! I learned at Fuller that Jesus's words in John 14:1-4 are taken directly from the Jewish wedding ceremony, when the groom assures his bride that he is going to prepare the place in his father's house where they will live together as one. The same motif is used in Jesus parable of the virgins (the bridesmaids) and their oil lamps that they are kerping lit to be ready for when the groom returns to take his bride to the wedding feast, Matthew 25. Knowing this adds so much depth to the assurance Jesus is giving to all his disciples at this time of uncertainty for them. So beautiful!

[@onlyonewhyphy]

I'm not a Christian, but scripture of any kind, is fascinating and potentially very beneficial. I love in depth looks at the details, origins, specifics and I'll definitely sub here. 9:17 - Wait, what? 😂

[@markbcrich]

He wasn’t correct. Only 2 places in the Bible where Lucifer is written. Isaiah. The king of Babylon. 2nd Peter, Jesus is Lucifer

[@onlyonewhyphy]

@@markbcrich I'd need to go through the whole video again to remember the specifics he spoke about, as I watch quite a lot like this. Is it possible he referred to another edition of The Bible? I know there's a range of difference between them. Is he categorically wrong? EDIT - I think he highlighted what appeared to be times Satan was being referred to, but is not considered so, or the opposite, being that it was a reference to Satan but, it wasn't about him, at all.

[@darnellgriffin6005]

​@@markbcrichYeshua/Jesus is the Bright One, the Holy One. The only one worthy of earthly glory!

[@markbcrich]

@@darnellgriffin6005 According to 2 Peter, Jesus is Lucifer. The actual word lucifer is in he Latin Vulgate referring to Jesus.

[@JoshuaSeevers]

You had so many opportunities to delve deeper into your nachash and its meaning as the shining one.

[@cherylweso]

I love what you do Brendan! I study with a great group, but I love the addition of your language knowledge. Thank you! In Christ Jesus always amen

[@davidwalker361]

Thank you for your videos. I learn or remember some of these things. Not sure why so many people want to read the word as it was written a week ago

[@rosalindfeemster8049]

Your messages help me to understand Gods word better. Thank you

[@tollaserfontein642]

Gods?

[@KennyIsbell]

Hello how are you feeling today and how's the weather condition over there today?

[@timelessperspective]

5:42 This is an important one. From this, I can see you understand the deeper context of which you speak.

[@ElizabethBattle]

I love biblical myth busting! Thank you so much, Brandon.

[@SavedByJesus-pi3yu]

But he is wrong about Isaiah. It does start off talking about the king of Babylon but than Isaiah’s thought shift to Satan which is the one behind the evil deeds being done by the king. The king was never in heaven to have fell from it and when humans do evil, they are being influenced by Satan. Isaiah is talking about both, the king or Satan depending on the verse you are focused on. Many bible scholars have explained this and it makes a lot of sense when reading it. It’s often done in other areas of the Bible as well such as ezeakial

[@markbcrich]

@@SavedByJesus-pi3yu The entire book of Isaiah never uses the word Satan. And it describes Lucifer as a man. So, it is not Satan.

[@ri3m4nn]

Satan is the king of Babylon.

[@dominicpardo4783]

@@ri3m4nn Satan is the king of your imagination.

[@ri3m4nn]

@dominicpardo4783 sure, canon is canon regardless of your personal belief, edgy teen.

[@deannekaye]

So good. I don't know how many people I've recommended your channel to.

[@GEES44DC]

Moving on its belly is not literal. It's symbolism for being embarrassed, brought to shame and humbled.

[@Marialla.]

I think the whole story is a myth about growing up. The garden of eden is childhood, when you are cared for by your parents (whom you see as God). The apple is sexuality. The snake is a part of a man, that can be wily and persuasive. There is no "fall" of mankind. There is only the end of childhood and stepping into adult responsibilities of childbirth and daily toil. "Upon thy belly" and "eat dust" only refer to how sex as an adult becomes rare rather than the daily playtime it seems to be when you are young and not a parent yet.

[@blackwatch4709]

@@Marialla. Lol what are you smoking?

[@GEES44DC]

@@Marialla. Every scholar would strongly disagree with this.

[@Marialla.]

@@blackwatch4709 What? You honestly think the talking snake thing makes more sense than a growing-up metaphor?

[@Marialla.]

@@GEES44DC What kind of scholars do you mean? The ones with time machines to confirm the actual talking snake and magical tree? Humans need growing up stories. It's normal to have a mythology to explain stuff. The story is dumb if taken literally, but makes sense as a metaphor.

[@CarlTuckersonn]

The only reason I became a Christian was because I thought I was supposed to get a mansion in Heaven.. I’m done.. thank you for exposing this I’m letting everyone of my church friends know this is a lie that our pastor is telling us

[@megadisneygeek]

Wish I knew Greek and Hebrew so I could read and understand those translations.

[@ChubbyChic]

Me too!

[@mamalor13]

Getting a good concordance and an expository Bible dictionary. I use Strong's Concordance and Vines Expository Dictionary. It is a big help.

[@garyrodriguez8414]

I also have used Strong's concordance and a bible dictionary. There is another concordance available known as Thayers. There are sites on the internet where you can acess all of these and more to save you the expense, they make it is to study, please remember to try to think like an ancient Jew when you are trying to discern the thought being conveyed.

[@ngdavid3925]

@@garyrodriguez8414 To get to the truth of everything, we need not think like a Jew or a Greek, but rather trust in the Holy Spirit to lead us into all truth. Jn.16:13 It is having the Mind of GOD and the Eyes of the LORD to see the scriptures as the LORD sees them. They that seek the LORD understand all things. Prov.28:5b

[@nevillenewman2785]

@@mamalor13 , Strong's can be very helpful but it is important to remember that it is a dictionary of root words, period. The original full title explains this. And, sadly, there is a lot of theology working its way "backward" in some of Strong's definitions. Use it, but do not use it alone.

[@nevillenewman2785]

Brandon, I downloaded your eBook on Bible Study Strategies, and it looks very good. I did notice something amiss, however, in bullet point #2 under Strategy #5. You write that "WE NEVER SEE JESUS TEACHING A DISCIPLE ALONE. THEY ALWAYS LEARN TOGETHER.". However, this is exactly what Paul/Sh'ul claims is the way he was taught. I'm not disagreeing at all that we should study together, because we can so easily wander off the right path, but I thought this bullet point should be addressed in the next revision.

[@virginiadavis1097]

I really enjoy every minute of video's.

[@DavidinMiami]

Excellent video! And Sheol is not even a fiery pit, an eternal hell. It's simply the realm of the dead. And it's sometimes used metaphorically. Case in point: While David was writing the 139th Psalm, he wrote the words, "If I make my bed in Sheol, you are there." God is in hell, where David is sleeping? Of course not! David is very much alive; therefore, we know that Sheol is a metaphor for something dark, depressing, painful, and/or deathly, and anguish of the soul that David compares to a deathly state.

[@sandiefrankenstein8972]

Another great lesson. Thank you Pastor!!

[@orwellhuxley8736]

Great video. First I have seen. I appreciate how you promote study of the Bible as opposed to reading the Bible. God Bless

[@seanocansey2956]

I hope there are more people like you. The more Biblically literate people there are, the better we will walk with God and fight worldly accusations.

[@dwightsimpson5386]

Not a believer, very good teaching things I already knew thanks

[@think1416]

Strongly disagree, in verses 12 - it starts different, it’s no longer about king, it is about Lucifer, about king story finished in verse 11

[@martinsolomon5500]

So in the Latin Vulgate version of 2 Peter 1:19. When Peter says “until the day dawns and LUCIFER rises in your hearts” Peter isn’t talking about VENUS (the morning star). Peter is saying until the day dawns and THE EVIL DEVIL WHO RULES THE UNDERWORLD rises in your hearts” 😂😂😂😂 That’s what Peter is saying. Hilarious 😂 and in the LATIN version of Psalms 110 When it says “in your holy garments, from the birth of LUCIFER, the dew of your youth” It is actually saying “in your holy garments, from the birth of the DEVIL THE RULER OF THE UNDERWORLD, the dew of your youth….” It’s not referring to the morning star. Venus at dawn - it means the EVIL DEVIL 👿 😂😂😂😂 Hilarious mate. So funny. 😂 😂 Your user name is THINK How ironic that you’re unable to think 🤔

[@s0cializedpsych0path]

​@@martinsolomon5500I was gonna address this comment, but you've already done a better job than I could have.

[@think1416]

@@martinsolomon5500 see if you dig in translation, you can get anything, In 2 peter original Greek said phosphorus, meaning illumination, meaning light not Lucifer , which in Latin by the way is same illumination as Greek phosphorus, It’s not about a person as a satan or jeses , it is about light it self

[@christopherchmiel7872]

In studying, Scripture so much has to be considered. In reference to the “snake in the garden”, nakash can also mean “ Shining One” or mean Seraphim in Egyptian. I don’t believe Genesis was referring to an actual snake but a rebel Son of God.

[@enforcerridley158]

No, scripture actually was referring to a snake with נָחָשׁ (nachash) considering that people who speak Hebrew fluently refer to snakes as _nachash._ The claim that _nachash_ can also mean "Shining One" is really nothing but apologetics with no real backing, confusing it with another name snakes can go by in Hebrew: שרף (saraph), derived from a root that means "to burn". This is because the pain from the bite from a venomous snake feels like burning, so venomous snakes are sometimes referred to as "burning ones" in Hebrew.

[@christopherchmiel7872]

If your position holds true, then what is the meaning of Genesis 3:15? What does enmity between the woman and an actual snakes seed mean?

[@Jrande2003]

The phrase is also used about Jesus and the Latin Lucifer is translated from the Hebrew, such that Christ is referred to as Lucifer in the Latin mass. Many have misunderstood that for years.

[@suetrublu]

Where did you hear that?

[@Jrande2003]

I read it in the Latin Vulgate @@suetrublu

[@waynejackson5678]

Didn't he say I saw Satan fail from heaven like a fallen star

[@robertgillis6245]

There are two trees mentioned that are mentioned in The Garden “ The Tree of Life “ and “ The Tree of Good and Evil.” Trees bear fruit. Isn’t it more important to know that it was a piece of fruit involved in the fall of man than argue over what type of fruit it was?

[@yahsmouse]

I am so glad to hear you teach the truth about Satan. Thank you Brandon

[@TB-rd5ms]

It’s not really the truth. Satans name was Michael then he fell down had his wings taken down and was called Lucifer. You know just like how Lutheran is named after Lucifer if you think about it. Then he became Satan. We call him the devil. Lived. Evil. Live. And if you really want to learn go read Enoch.

[@IAMJ1B]

So are u agreeing satan didn't fall sky. Then explain luke 10:18verse Jesus says about satan fall from sky

[@mike11800]

​@@IAMJ1Bpeople believe anything this video is so misleading 😂😂😂😂😂

[@IAMJ1B]

@@mike11800 yep. Many are waiting and allowing scholars to teach them anything not god and this happens.🥴

[@mike11800]

@@IAMJ1B it's amazing how he can read scripture and butcher it and people actually believe him the bible say"s my people will perish for the lack of knowledge!!!!

[@tsovka]

Thank you for this video!

[@GinetteEvand]

You Are A Good Teacher. Thank You. May God Inspire you Always!🌻

[@majormayco]

Continue searching but you'll never find, because you've never discovered the Holy Spirit.

[@IAMJ1B]

Explain luke 10:18

[@burongaroso2538]

Amein and Amein Brother Brandon. All Glory to Yahuah ❤ Yahusha yasha ❤ May the Face of Yah shine on you.

[@ericvondell5157]

PROOF That You should NEVER Drink and Text!

[@SavedByJesus-pi3yu]

As others mentioned, Isaiah started off talking about the king of Babylon but his thoughts shifted in the next verse when he was describing the fall of Satan who is the evil behind the king of babylons, actions. We know this because the king of Babylon was never in heaven to ever fall from it but Satan was. Any person on earth who does evil is being used by the devil which is why Isaiah speaks of him here. It’s done in other areas of the Bible. Someone made a more detailed explanation of this in the comments below. Scroll down for their detailed comment

[@zadkiel242]

Yeah no. That's not supported and make no sense. The first stories about an angelic rebellion is in the Book of Enoch which was written almost 500 years after Isaiah. That angel's name was Asael. Satan was always used as a role or title and never as a name.

[@theeternalsbeliever1779]

@@zadkiel242 The Enoch book is not divinely inspired, so your argument is completely irrelevant.

[@zadkiel242]

@@theeternalsbeliever1779 Enoch being inspired isn't the point. The point is that there is NO mention of an angelic rebellion in Tanakh. That story is in the book of Enoch. If you don't think it's inspired, great. Neither is the story of an angelic rebellion.

[@markbcrich]

Isaiah is comparing the King of Babylon's rise and fall to the planet Venus. That is all. There is no mention of Satan in the whole book of Isaiah. You are reading more in to the scripture than it actually says.

[@markbcrich]

@@theeternalsbeliever1779 Whether it is inspired is not relevant. It is what is actually said that zadkiel is referencing. However, Jude quotes the Book of Enoch and says it is prophesy. So, at least the author of Jude thought it was inspired.

[@Ephesians1.7]

The serpent tempted Eve (not both) then she went to Adam when he ate of the fruit.

[@achildofthelight4725]

Eve meaning: breath, giver of life, is the Spirit of God breathed into Adam as the Light (Spiritual Mind) Serpent: carnal mind of man, a false image of the Light.... the fall happened in Generation 1, Genesis 2 is the beginning of Salvation. Adam is the first redeemer (Jesus figure) the son of God, and he falls before Eve is beside him.... as his breath is removed from him..... its a reversal of Jesus when he is born man, and the breath is given again in baptism ❤

[@Jpdejesus]

Thank you!

[@gcnewd]

I dont care what anybody says, Brandon what you are doing is awesome. And i really believe you are blessed by God to decipher these passages that are confusing to "not so studious people" like me. Thank you

[@tollaserfontein642]

Amen my sister!

[@elrafa5845]

That's a man not a sister lol wtf is wrong with you people

[@milforddekalb6429]

This is a false teacher don't listen to him.

[@ChubbyChic]

What is your proof for such an accusation?

[@DRVenard]

If he is false, then all of the reference material he sites is false! I have a difficult time believing Jewish people, familiar with the Old Testament in its original language are "False" as well. His biggest idea is for YOU to not accept what "someone else tells you" but to "study it out for yourself" he tells you how to do this for YOURSELF. He isn't saying: "trust me, I'm right, they're wrong" like you are claiming. He is simply saying 1) study your Bible 2) go "Beyond the Words" 3) consider that certain verses may not mean as we've been told. 4) use every resource at your disposal to find truth in scripture. To be honest, I've never heard a heretical word come from his mouth. If anything, he is encouraging YOU to do the work and proof it yourself!

[@Unknown2Yoo]

I would encourage folks to also understand that the Tanak is full of archetypes, metaphors, and hints when it comes to multiple prophecies. We find that prophets, like Isaiah, spoke for his time and the future time as well. You see this when Peter quotes Joel in Acts. Even though we can understand that passage literally when it comes to the king being called Lucifer, we must not dismiss it is important information for understanding an "antichrist"/lawless archetype that is illustrated throughout the Bible. The misrepresentation from Christian tradition is trying to do this ignorantly. Simply remember there is merit to understanding that one passage, especially written by prophetic authors, can have more than one meaning and it was common for Jewish Christians to hold two ideas in tension.

[@CynthiaAlvarado-l1g]

Thanks for the truth 🙏 l learned so much 😊🎉❤

[@JUSLOFI]

Thank You.

[@ambientmethod]

It's important to interpret scripture with scripture. Scripture always supports itself. Isaiah is not the only place you can find an account of Satan rebelling and God casting him from heaven. In Isaiah, the prophet is most certainly talking to the Babylonian king, but spiritually, he is also speaking to the power behind this king, which is Satan himself. Izaiah identifies Satan with Nebuchadnezzar, as one who was one with Satan. Ezekiel does the same thing when speaking to the king of Tyre. He says 'you were in Eden' and refers to him as the anointed cherub of God, and says 'So I cast you out of the mountain of God.... Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty....' and it goes on and on, in even more detail than Isaiah. Very consistent with Isaiah's speaking. This is important to see. Yes these prophets are speaking to these kings, but there is deeper spiritual significance in their speech. These worldly kings were one with Satan and used by Satan in his worldly administration.

[@kimmeyfitts9539]

Thanks so much for your honesty. I was following someone who just couldn't understand the importance of the King James Version or the Hebrew/Greek words. You are doing a wonderful service to the sheep. 😇

[@erichwentz2866]

The King James Version was edited by an ungodly tyrant king. That book has no authority.

[@janosterud4188]

Excellent teaching. Thank You. What revelations are revealed to us when we look up definitions of words and test the spirits of the translators

[@IAMJ1B]

U are a liar too? So are u agreeing satan didn't fall sky. Then explain luke 10:18verse Jesus says about satan fall from sky

[@janosterud4188]

@@IAMJ1B yep the Bible says every man is a liar. I fall under that category You still didn't address if the word lucifer should be in Is 14:12

[@IAMJ1B]

@@janosterud4188 So that means u r still under the laws of gentiles not grace. That escapism proves u still stand with this false teacher. Damn. U r not from god

[@IAMJ1B]

@@janosterud4188 So that means u r still under the laws of gentiles not grace? Thats why u don"t know anything about it and appreciating liar. Nothing to say more. U itself proved

[@markbcrich]

@@IAMJ1B Luke describes Satan falling from the sky. But, it doesn't say that Lucifer in Isaiah is the same being. Isaiah makes it clear that it is the King of Babylon. There is no mention of satan in the entire book. If someone is saying that Lucifer is Satan, then they need to explain why Peter in 2 Peter calls Jesus Lucifer.

[@ehaley6838]

This is excellent. Thank you so much

[@jillbuzzard6808]

Thank you for your words, I do learn a lot.

[@IAMJ1B]

Yeah you learned lies. Good. So are u agreeing satan didn't fall sky. Then explain luke 10:18verse Jesus says about satan fall from sky

[@christineterry9953]

You mentioned "Jewish idioms' in your video, one is used for the 'Unknown Hour" of Christ's return. It's something to do with the Levitical feasts. Could you possibly do a video on the topic?

[@DIYDaveT]

Great message! Don't herd. Read the Bible. Learn for yourself. You cannot have a personal relationship with Him unless you read His word yourself.

[@Nostalgianic]

4:43 Something to note. If they didn't know good and evil yet (right and wrong) then they weren't accountable yet. Therefore, eating from the Tree of Knowledge was a transgression of the law, not a sin. It's the same concept as a young child not being accountable vs an older child. Young children don't know right from wrong yet. That's why it's not necessary for young children to be baptized to wash away sins because they have no sins yet.

[@brianmann4705]

Shalom Brandon Robbins, this is not the first time, this is the second I started to listen to you and you sounded like you are teaching what you learned from a pharisee modern day orthodox judaism. They will tell you it is wrong, while they themselves do it. The very first 7 words in bereshyt/gen 1:1 teach us the principles there must be 2 or more witnesses to establish a matter as truth, and that everything is both physical & spiritual. The Word of YeHoVaH has what is called a plain meaning, and then the deeper spiritual meanings, like an onion, you peel back the layers to get to the core. Yeshayahu/isa 14:12 is both.

[@teleacaldwell]

Could you please do (Matthew 16:28 - Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.”) Would love to hear your take on this. Love finding the truth about the bible, thank you.

[@philipleong2602]

I read somewhere that he was referring to John at the island of Patmos

[@RobKlarmann]

Thanks Brandon. Enjoyed the first part, but the second half included content that's repetitive (you've spoken about these things before). Something I'd be interested in, is investigating how the misconceptions have managed to survive through the 20th century, when there have been numerous scholars, who have pointed out these mistranslations. And yet, popular (Christian) culture insists on holding on to the imagery of the serpent/apple and the rooster crowing. These have been illustrated by many artists throughout the centuries and somehow won't be replaced by the correct meaning. At the same time, I wonder if theologians/pastors etc. feel that it's irrelevant to the actual meaning conveyed by these passages. Does it matter if the serpent is already in the tree tempting Eve or whether the devil's form looks different? I'd say it does, because the serpent is a consequence of disobedience and Christians don't want to hear about a God who actually does carry out consequences. Perhaps you could elaborate on this further, why knowing the correct context and meaning is essential? Thanks so much!

[@RichlandCommunity]

Have you done an episode exposing the pre-trib rapture?

[@johnwillsea6600]

Thanks for another wonderful viseo

[@TboneWTF]

Here's an excerpt from a Google search : There are at least seven passages in the Bible where God is depicted as directly permitting or endorsing slavery. Two of these are in the Law of Moses: God permitted the Israelites to take slaves from conquered peoples permanently, and the Israelites could sell themselves into slavery temporarily to pay off debts (Exod 21:2-11; Lev 25:44-46). The other five passages are in the New Testament, where slavery as a social institution is endorsed and slaves are called to obey their masters “in everything” (Eph 6:5-9; Col 3:22-4:1; 1 Tim 6:1-2; Tit 2:9-10; 1 Pet 2:18-20).

[@TboneWTF]

lol

[@vincentwood7036]

During 1611 the primary meanings of "Mansion" were "to dwell" or "to reside" or "dwelling place" or "place or residence". It comes from the root word "maneo" which means "to dwell". The thesaurus also lists all of its variant meanings including "to dwell" and "to reside".

[@RedCloudGawdian]

I agree that Isaiah 14:12 is about a Babylonian King, but to say it isn't about the rebel from Genesis 3 is to isogete rather than exogete the text. Many of Isaiah's prophecies have double meaning and come true twice. His prophecies about a child being born refer to both the birth of his own son and that of the Messiah. So with that context in mind, I can't say 14:12 doesn't refer to Serpent. But I will agree that Lucifer and the story of the heavenly rebellion is a bunch of mistranslations and verses taken out of context to create myth.

[@TnOrchidguy]

Thank you, brother, thank you.

[@montezhill9003]

Beautiful

[@emmabrauer5360]

thank you so helpful

[@johncarminati2326]

I really appreciate that you wish to dispel myths. And i must agree with much of your presentation. But you really need to read Isaiah 14 in context. Though it is addressed to the king of Babylon it says"...how you have fallen from heaven...". Which king of babylon fell from heaven?

[@WusWrongWitUs]

First time on the account and its already speaking my language

[@joycedalesio9575]

Thank you for your studies. What study bible would you recommend that has information on the word meaning and the history and culture notes of the time? There are so many bible studies out there and I want one that is true to the Bible in all respects. Thank you

[@DRVenard]

He has many referenced books in his Amazon. I have gotten several books from that list. I know he uses different study Bibles too. I belong to the Beyond the Words community. The list is linked above in the description under *Books I have found helpful in creating these videos: (followed by the link) My favorites were the Rabbi Jesus series! God bless your studies📖🙏💗🕊

[@Nolo00000000]

Finally someone speaking truth 🤦🏽‍♂️🙌🏽🙌🏽

[@ladygreen632]

Wrong. He's not getting it all either

[@jorgeabuauad]

Doing witchcraft mudras with the fingers .

[@stormythelowcountrykitty7147]

Thank you for this

[@IAMJ1B]

For what. Learned lies from a false teacher?

[@ErikMeliska]

In Genesis 3:1, the creature that tempts Adam and Eve is explicitly described as a serpent before their sin. The transformation of the serpent to crawl on its belly is a consequence of its role in the temptation, as stated later in Genesis.

[@truthmonger7]

For more on this topic, No King But Caesar & The Return Of The Melchisedec is available online at Advantage Books. Peace to all.

[@PDPresents]

If you give a cell phone connected to the internet to a isolated tribe that has never seen human civilization, that would be a perfect example of a fruit of the knowledge of good and evil. if they eat of it, it will change them forever.

[@PBTexasBoy]

Great comment.