Knives Out movie review -- Breakfast All Day

[@Killdreamsdead]

If Alonso dislikes something and Matt likes it = usually the best movies possible. Him liking charlie's angels kind of convinces me to not watch it.

[@alijoe4ever]

He's actually the worse lol. Blow my mind that he's a professional and so this for a job

[@TheSpiritOfTheTimes]

@@alijoe4ever Matt? Yes, he's a bit of dummy but a lot of people do not read criticism for anything but confirming their likes.

[@not2sharpmd]

I disagree with Alonso about there not being more. Without spoiling anything, I think that the house was "played with" a perfect amount. Any more and I think it would have verged on gimmicky. And with the utilization of the cast, sure I would have liked to have seen these great actors get more to do, but if you think about it, they all do each get at least one great moment to shine and sink their teeth into. And each of them plays off each other perfectly. The best proof I have is that each character is so memorable. A lot of them have two or three great moments that I can immediately think of and point to as amazing character bits. If they were more involved it might have messed with the pacing, which is so important with this kind of film, or it might have ended up being a 2 and a half hour movie.

[@histubeness]

I agree. One of the problems with Alonso's point that he felt some characters don't get as much screen time as others, is that you can't portion out equal screen time for every character, and still have a movie that's 2 hrs. and 10 minutes long, and no longer. The movie goes on just long enough, without being too long. To keep that same length, you'd have cut out screen/performance time that's there for other characters already. I thought Knives Out was pretty much weighted out as perfectly as possible, to work as well as it did.

[@Stuie299]

They need to do a second review where they are able to talk about spoilers. I'm interested to hear more about Matt and Alonso's diverging opinions.

[@luminaorchis4376]

I absolutely loved Knives Out; it’s not only one of the best films from last year- it’s one of the better films we’ve had in the genre. Rian Johnson has delivered yet again- showing how he can achieve great original films just as phenomenally as he achieves great films in pre-established franchises [such as Star Wars with The Last Jedi]. 🤗 I’m eagerly anticipating the sequel! Cheers! 🍻

[@MrGMovieReviews]

Charlie's Angels 2019 will never have a cult following like the other two films. It lacks the energy, and the visual backbone.

[@iansmart4158]

But it's so fun tho

[@MrGMovieReviews]

@@iansmart4158 How tho, compared to the other 2. It looks so bland too. No personality

[@MrGMovieReviews]

@@j2forew974 I liked her and Naomi Scott a lot and Ella was fine, but the material was trash.

[@BIGTENFanatic]

Yup. I really enjoyed the two originals, especially the second one. This new one doesn’t even compare to the original 2

[@citeriorcf]

Im with Matt here. I loved it

[@kwalton7690]

After seeing the film I agree with Alonso. The film is just Ok. I read Agatha Christie novels and hard for me to believe that people comparing this film to classic Christie have actually read classic Christie novels. The film also FEELS long. I agree that you should keep your expectations modest.

[@kylestyyle987]

Yeah I was expecting a more Christie-like reveal at the end that suddenly makes all the loose details fit... the actual reveal was okay but expected more

[@eve_venn]

I agree with Alonso. Maybe my expectations were too high. Liked it, didn’t love it.

[@richardsmith3121]

Alonso really needs to see ‘Brick’

[@shakenbake228]

@@reneelasswell3734 oh

[@ethidian3444]

@@reneelasswell3734 is that you Jeremy Jahns

[@jaybee1196]

One of the best film review channels.

[@SilverScale.]

OMG! I missed you guys ever since the TYT days! How did this fly under my radar?! SUB-scriiiiiiibed!

[@AgentOccam]

Well, you were right about it being a hit. And a much bigger one than many expected. Opened about double what was predicted and has proven to have legs.

[@erikb120]

I agree with tempering expectations. Mine were too high as well when I went to watch this knowing very little, so I wish I’d heard less as to how great this was supposed to be.

[@yagocampos9604]

I felt just like Alonso, but the more I think about the movie just the way it is withouth the weight of failed expectations, the more I love it and the more I want to rewatch it.

[@straightedgeveganbel2453]

To me the perfect execution of this type of movie is Gosford Park.

[@morriemukoda45]

So glad to find you guys and gal again!!

[@valzod3808]

I'll see it at some point

[@straightedgeveganbel2453]

I completely agree with Alonso

[@leapingwater]

OK I just found these guys again after not seeing WTFlick for however long, and I must say: chunkier Matt is back and the world makes sense again. I did not like his skinny persona.

[@musicmann1967]

Thanks so much, guys! This movie looks like it's right up my alley! (Alonso, ffs, see Brick!! It's great!)

[@kylestyyle987]

Any of you keeping up with Mr. Robot? It’s outstanding

[@BobSullivanAKABuffy]

LOVED Ana de Armas! Can't wait to see her explode! Looks like she'll soon be a Bond girl.

[@heisenbaj]

She has been cast in No Time To Die! 😂

[@JozieLeePro]

Knives Out. Disappointing. Such a good cast. Who doesn't love a good mystery? Promising start. Unfortunately found myself waking up at too many intervals. Upcoming dates with pals to see it again. Maybe better second time around?

[@RodneyAllanPoe]

Enjoy your clips, team. Video tip: try putting your heads two-thirds or three-quarters of the way up the frame, not half way. Windows and walls aren't very interesting.

[@SpudBro1]

Coming back to this review after glass onion. strange how people will focus on things and let it impact a review… e.g. great cast where its seen as a negative because they don’t have more to do… i.e you mean the role they read for… The fact good characters are in that fashion is exactly why you need good actors, get the most out of those roles as possible so that people are invested and can believe at any point any of them could have been responsible.. the fact the story focuses on only a few players is to move along the story and keep us focus the essential.

[@BreakfastAllDay]

Thanks for watching and sharing your thoughts.

[@shakenbake228]

I agree with Alonso

[@michaelgreene4816]

Now I know that Alonso and I do not have the same taste in film. Looper is one Hell of a movie. Willis' performance is his best in a looong time.

[@angelthman1659]

Agree with Alonso. Good but not great. The house was the weakest part of the movie for me. The rooms were small, so the cast spends a lot of time sitting in tiny spaces rather than move around.

[@abhiezibran9654]

I really need to know Alonso's top 10 of this year.

[@lafrikone]

So you can stay far away? Jokes. But in my case we rarely agree.

[@tccandler]

Alonso -- "White House Down" was atrocious. "Olympus Has Fallen" was 1000 times better. Hence the sequels.

[@ajman031790]

This movie was a let down, I thought it should have been more of a who done it than a can the main character "get away with it"

[@NitaTheDiva510]

Thanks for your honesty Alonzo. I think I fell asleep in the second act. RJ and his fans thinks he's more clever than he really is and the movie was mediocre. So yes. Temper those expectations.

[@Bosanovadude1]

Subvert those expectations

[@earnthis1]

or maybe you just didn't give it a real chance?

[@coolman102490]

I thought it was a dull movie

[@BIGTENFanatic]

The action in Charlie’s Angels was garbage...at least the action in the originals was over the top fun. The new one was poorly filmed and choreographed

[@theitaIianstallion]

NEED SPOILER REVIEWS PLEASE

[@cjwright79]

I was really turned off by the trailer because 1. the setting and the vibe is so decandant and gaudy and tasteless 2. smarmy Chris Evans disgusts me 3. silly Daniel Craig with a strange way of speaking is a dastardly mistake, it tarnishes his legacy as Bond, and as Michael Blomkvist in Dragon Tattoo (also with Christopher Plummer) I'd rather stay home and watch Plummer in Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country for the 20th time than pay $14 and ride the bus for two hours total to see this aesthetic abomination May I say once more Christy that you were really on your game the day you recorded these reviews, such lucid prose and advanced composition!

[@PrincipiaDeCinema]

I really appreciate very forceful and negative reviews of films by people who haven't seen them. Especially when they include such brilliant observations as Chris Evans shouldn't play the type of characters he specialized in playing before being cast in Captain America, and Daniel Craig should never play anything too dissimilar to James Bond, because that ruins Bond somehow. Also, where the fuck do you live where you have to take a two hour bus ride to see a movie? (I assume this is there and back.) If you live in an urban area, with actual public transportation, there is NO WAY a movie theater is an hour bus ride away. If you live in a rural area, why are you taking a bus in the first place, and where the fuck does a movie cost $14 dollars in a rural area or suburban area? Even in major cities on the coasts, most movies cost less than $14 dollars, unless they are in IMAX or some shit. Anyway, I give this comment 1.6, mostly because it is grammatically correct. Edit: I see from your channel you might be Canadian, which might explain the $14 and two hour bus drive. Sorry, I assumed you were American due to the stupidity of your opinions.

[@crakatoot5480]

This movie sucked

[@mexgiova]

Why are you so red?