Breitling Superocean - Where is the value?

[@dannysimenauer5745]

I own several Breitling watches, and applaud the new version of SuperOcean! Unlike many Swiss brands which hardly ever try out new designs, I think this design pops! If it doesn't sell then Breitling can always go back to its old design. I believe this new model will appeal to the new generation of collectors. Kudos to Breitling for designing something brand new!

[@ChaosAI24]

The new design brings something fresh, I sense the other's fear of bringing something new on the scene, the courage must be appreciated, they've done a very good job but the finishing still needs a bit of refinement, just a bit!

[@nigeljames83]

Just got the code yellow "46" love it !

[@j.willis5570]

I guess if you were stranded on a deserted island, you could make a boat and break off the minute hand, and use it as a paddle.

[@nukiepoo]

I almost p*ssed myself when I read that comment. Touché

[@diavalus]

Remark applies for Tudor as well.

[@IrixGuy]

@@diavalusThe snowflake on Chewdah would freeze the water.

[@mariog7213]

🤣🤣🤣

[@Ooz1977]

Proud owner of the black version, the watch is extremely accurate. Inside movement gets you less power reserve then expected at this price level but is never really an issue, it just keeps running as you wear it ;) Sits really well on the wrist too. Design is finally something that stands out while keeping a retro feel/look. Materials used are absolute top quality, very happy with it.

[@kevinpuloski]

And you can get this moment serviced / fixed anywhere in the world. 👍

[@richardattridge3182]

I think people getting upset about the movement in this watch is a little bit daft. The movement is a high grade COSC certified movement based on an ETA 2824-2. Breitling use a lot of high quality parts in the calibre 17. It’s a very easy movement to service and will cost considerably less for this very robust movement to maintain. Love the yellow dial on the super ocean 42, its superb. Great general review Bruce.

[@cdepo2042]

I have the 42mm black dial on bracelet and bought the rubber strap. The strap is fantastic. Yes the movement could better but it is slimmer, adjustable and fits excellent. This is the adult version of the prior model. Thanks Bruce!

[@giusepperocchi2979]

There’s nothing adult in that minutes hand.

[@jimlittle5769]

It's also regulated to chronometer specs AND it'll but MUCH cheaper to service when it's time than an in-house movement. That's the part that cracks me up about people who bemoan the movement. They want the in-house movement that will make the watch cost more and also cost more to service, then complain about those prices too.

[@jimlightanddark]

Nice vid! I like the new version way more than the discontinued one. Kudos to Breitling.

[@ashleychambers7602]

I’ve just bought the 46mm in black and looks fabulous. I don’t give a rats ass about it not having a in-house movement and poor power reserve because it’s on my wrist regular and keeps superb time and the build quality is top notch.

[@slanealb]

Movement snob alert here... Seeing this on your wrist at the garage grill event got my cogs moving. LOVE no dates and I love boldness of color. If this watch was priced close to an Oris which (essentially) contains the same mvmt, I would be throwing my money at Breitling. I think the 300m comparison you make perfectly illustrates where the value propositions falls short. The 300m has a METAS certified movement, open case back, ceramic bezel, laser waved grain dial, 300m WR with saturation valve, and very strong brand cachet. Now I think the Breitling SuperOcean is beautiful, but I'm still battling my internal movement grinch. If one could have Superocean for $4100 on Bracelet and $3900 on rubber and I'm buying this thing tomorrow. It just hard for me to spend 5 grand on a two hundred dollar movement, but I am starting to see the light. Beautiful photography as always Bruce, you make that turquoise explode on the screen, you are an amazing artist.

[@TheLastRealWatchGuy]

If I handed you two identical watches with different movements. You would not be able to tell me which is which. Hop off the high horse and enjoy your life.

[@kyleweber9760]

I love the new style, the colors are incredible too!!!!

[@jeremyelliott9831]

Picked up the orange Kelly slater version. Loving it, especially on the breitling NATO. The hate seems to come from a place of inexperience or disinterest. I can say that the top 3-5 internet complaints about this watch aren’t relevant to the actual in person piece. Open your eyes and enjoy.

[@jimlittle5769]

I have it too and I love it on the green rubber strap it came on. Can't get myself to switch it out. It was the color combo of dial/strap that drew me to the watch.

[@nschepis]

I like the design. Very practical and functional as an actual diver, which I think sometimes gets forgotten with modern dive watches. The minute hand is highly visible and distinguishable from the hour hand and this helps the lume as well which is most important on the minute hand and bezel marker when diving. I own multiple breitlings, Rolexes, omegas and really like this version of the SO. While most will never dive with it that is the purpose of the design, and for others it is something unique that sets it apart from other watches and makes it interesting.

[@rhdtv2002]

Absolutely stunning..im a big fan of Breitling even if at the moment I'm not there financially to own one..thanks for showing these..great watches

[@tywinn5786]

Tried a couple on a few days ago. I liked everything except the Hour Hand and the price. Needs a new Hour Hand and better movement for the price. A Tudor BB58 or BB Ceramic with in house movement available at or below SuperOcean MSRP.

[@micahpbt9638]

I think a lot of people underestimate the thin factor of a dive watch. Comparing this to a Omega Diver 300m and the SO Heritage, this is noticeably slimmer and sits better on the wrist. It's my pick of the 3.

[@ivanlim9459]

*0.48 what kind light of torch* ❓

[@ats-3693]

I have the Superocean II 44mm blue dial and bezel with bracelet and rubber dive strap I love it, it's my second favourite watch next to my Planet Ocean 600m 43.5mm with black ceramic dial and bezel also with bracelet and rubber strap.

[@jimlittle5769]

Gorgeous watch! I prefer the Kelly Slater LE version, so I got that, but this would have been my next choice.

[@philc1773]

I'm a big fan. In the dive watch sector. No one is pushing it like Breitling, design way ahead of the competition.

[@craigwoolbert2443]

As always- great job Bruce! That yellow one is amazing.

[@y_rb4080]

I loved this more than the previous one

[@jaredcoffin3907]

I am among those not loving the new generation. My favorite iteration is two generations back with the large italicized arabics. And no I do not believe that given only with the requisite passage of time all will necessarily become converts. Just as Mapplethorpe’s photography will always (rightfully) offend, so too will this generation of SO be forever objectionable. Yes, it is true that over time “more” will “grow” to accept this model. They will do so, however, not because their aesthetic taste has “risen” to the proper level such that they can appreciate what they initially had been missing, but rather any delayed adoration will have come from the weakening of their aesthetic resolve, the effort with which to maintain proving unsustainable over time such that the far easier course - the “growing to like it” path - proved an acceptable escape hatch from the burdensome task of holding true to one’s aesthetic values. I pledge to stay strong 👍🏻.

[@JoelDrumReview]

I love the new gen. I’m all in.

[@davidb9531]

Looking for value in a breitling is like looking for ham in a birthday cake

[@RedwoodAggie]

This is a watch that needs to be seen in person, and tried on wrist. The giant minute hand threw me off when I first saw it online, but this watch really impressed me in person. I actually loved the Navy blue 42mm on bracelet, and I also tried on the green 44mm on rubber strap, which fit my 7-1/4” wrist well also. I think the thinness, the quality of the bezel rotation feel, quick adjust clasp, and just overall build quality are there. Do I feel it’s maybe a touch overpriced? Maybe a bit, but not by a lot. I saw a video comparing this to Tudor and saying the build quality wasn’t nearly as good as Tudor. Tudor is great, but I think these are built quite well. Anybody knocking these needs to go try them on. I will say I wish the movement was a little higher end. I truly don’t care about in house at this level, and I did read that Breitling said they needed to be able to get a high quantity of movements, and this allowed to do that. I do wish they had used a current SW300 base, as my understanding (from what another brand told me) is Sellita is only delivering the newer 56hr power reserve version of those at this point. I care more about power reserve than in-house. Getting a full 2 days off wrist isn’t quite the 70 or 80 hours of some brands, but it is certainly better than 1 day. Sinn and some other brands are using these now. I do appreciate that they are using a COSC movement. It would be a deal breaker for me if it wasn’t COSC at this price. While I agree that the Omega SMP is a great watch from a technical and movement standpoint, the things you pointed out do bother me. I hated rotating the bezel, the Helium escape valve is ugly, and the bracelet is not only bulky, but dated looking. The only other wish list item would be to have a date option at the 6 o’clock, but I know a lot of enthusiasts like no date. Finally, I don’t think it is fair to characterize this release as not popular. I tried these on at my AD in August. They had a few empty spots, but in general had the sizes and types I wanted to try on. By the time I went to show my wife the model in early November, the new Super Ocean section was wiped out except for an orange 36mm on strap. It looked like a Rolex display (also at this same AD)! I was bummed I couldn’t show one to her on my wrist. Navitimer, Chronomat/Chronomat GMT, Top Time, and all the other models were filing the display cases. The sales guy even told me the new Super Ocean is quite popular. Maybe it’s only popular here in Texas, but I can’t imagine tastes vary that much regionally.

[@georgetown8986]

That’s what Stevie Wonder said look what happened to him after looking at it in person.

[@scottwexlin6456]

I have now tried this watch twice, on two separate visits to my AD. I just can't get myself to commit. While I'm thinking about it more, and it's a good looking watching, I just can't commit to it - yet.

[@shaijam8021]

What about its daily variation of secs for this model?

[@paradoxstudios6639]

Did you ever put that steel bracelet on the bronze model, will it work ?

[@jodysilvia2]

The Fat chapter ring and that enormous square is starting to grow on me a little. I'm a breitling fan either way.

[@Pepsiaddicto]

I just picked up a new old stock Breitling Galactic Unitime SleekT, a watch I didn't even know existed until recently. I've never seen the watch in any watch media, but it has an in house movement with a patented world time function that is better than any world timer I've seen. It also has a tungsten carbide bezel that is amazing in person. It has an $8k+ MSRP, but you can pick them up in perfect condition for well under $4k. Really an underrated watch IMO.

[@yz8096]

Good objective analysis, Bruce. Thanks. These are worth considering (all things considered - LOL).

[@RTTGuy45]

As a big fan of Breitling and big heavy mechanical watches I have used Breitling divers, Superocean A17040, A17360, A17390 as daily driver for work, travel and leisure for 20+ years. I recently went to my local retailer to look at the Superocean 44 (now discontinued) and I got put off trying it with the rubber strap, stainless is my preference, I was tempted but I wasn't impressed enough by the stainless steel bracelet to part with my cash. Other than what's left of the Avenger series Breitlings are no longer the "Instruments for Professionals" they used to be. Their new Breitlight watches are just embarrassing to an old Breitling fan as me. The Superocean series is heading the same way. There was a time I loved the design of almost everything in their collection - It seams like Breitling and me have grown apart, there is not much in their current collection that appeals to me (but the Chronomat with the UTC is cool). I suppose watch collectors and influencers buy more watches that those of us that buys a high end daily driver every 7-10 years. I just can't help thinking that sometimes change is not needed. There is plenty of watches out there with new bold designs, no need the Superoceans to join this club! 35 years ago I had a Submariner now I'm thinking of getting another one...

[@Adam-on6hl]

I got the white dial , I get some looks and compliments, i like it because it's young and sporty.

[@blakslee720]

Value is such a tough thing to deal with. Breitlings in general seem to depreciate like a brick in the ocean, so I would never buy one new. This watch is stunning, and if I owned one, that's what I'd be thinking about. For my next diver, the Omega 2254 has priority, but this Breitling will definitely come at some point.

[@Loopie157]

Had the pleasure of trying on the Black and white version and found myself with raised eyebrows kinda muttering wow, this is actually really nice! Especially at 42 and not too thick , it ticks quite a few boxes

[@bennettcain635]

I have to say before the release of this watch Brietling were up there on my list, especially the previous iteration. But this released turned me off. But your video has enticed me with those macro shots and how it looks on the wrist. I think it might grow on me now.

[@AM-qk5qg]

Hi Bruce. Does it wear larger or smaller than a SMP?

[@AM-qk5qg]

@@Pler1978 hate this. Breitling was one of the few remaing brands for us big wrist folks. Now that is gone too

[@markymark3572]

I think I'm in the minority in preferring the new generation to the old. I like it👍

[@BruceWilliams]

It was the same with thr old gen. Watch enthusiasts are slow to come around, but it will happen

[@markymark3572]

@@BruceWilliams I agree. I think the price is a bit steep for a Sellita movement though, maybe an Oris Aquis offers better bang per buck if you're talking Sellita?

[@jimlittle5769]

I never even considered a Breitling till they released the Pistachio B09 chrono. Almost bought that, like REALLY close. When the new Superocean came out, I didn't hesitate. Jumped on it. So I'm with you, prefer the new generation.

[@rw6836]

I could agree with some commenters, this is not an "only watch", it's a watch within a collection. As an only watch, one might want something more conventional. As a watch within a collection, this is something different and fun. I'm interested in the turquoise dial in 44mm too, it would be different color than my other watches. When I first saw it online, I disliked the weird square on the minute hand. Since then, the look of the whole watch has grown on me. Haven't seen it in-person yet, but will go see it soon. The big rehaut might look strange to some, but I like how the black numbers and markers take on shiny appearance against the white background under certain lighting. Some also don't like the small-ish dial? I kind of like a smaller dial, over one that is too big and has lots of "empty space". As to the price, I'll for sure try to get a discount, if I end up buying one.

[@marcdee4427]

Much much prefer the seamaster

[@stapleboss]

The only thing wrong with Breitling is their prices are 25-50% too high, so I don't see any value. For $1K more than this SO you could get an OP41. These new SOs used prices are already under $4K. I don't own a Breitling because I can always find something better for less money.

[@BruceWilliams]

Haha then you will always miss out

[@philc1773]

Yep, you clearly know nothing about watches....

[@jimlittle5769]

I think if someone was looking to buy a watch to be their everyday watch., you know, like normals do, this isn't the watch for them to get. I'd certainly recommend a Seamaster 300M instead. This watch belongs in a collection of watches. More of a fun watch.

[@rossdev]

@@jimlittle5769 Have to agree. Funny thing is I sold both my Seamaster 300's to buy the new SO 42 and the rest went towards a Planet Ocean. I guess I've had my fill of Seamasters over the last few years and wanted something different, but they are a fantastic watch.

[@brutustheoldeenglishbulldo8672]

An OP41 at 1k more!?!? 😂😂😂 cheapest OP41 is 10k. These brand new can be had for just over half the price of an OP41. If you can even get an OP41 at MSRP

[@iancraig6070]

As ever great job Bruce.I prefer the previous model which looks a far better quality.The new one looks like a bad startup design,in fact it looks cheap.

[@TheLastRealWatchGuy]

You are so clearly talking out of your ass and haven’t seen it in person

[@ikirikchi]

It borrowed design from 2005 Breitling Slow Motion diving chronograph without borrowing it’s functionality. That’s why it looks strange.

[@AndyAndy-kk7qt]

First Breitling wich i like, i have the green one 44 mm..i love the watch.

[@stevedoyle74]

I used to love Breitling. I still like a lot of their style (including the new super ocean) - but I think they are way over priced for what they give ya. And just as I typed that out you brought up brought up what I was saying lol

[@tapirdeaalex7104]

The inner white rim is way too fat , it would have looked better if it was 35% smaller. Also, that minute hand is an abomination. Im not sure how well this model is selling but I hope they will launch am improved version of this soon.

[@itsryetime]

Is that a press on case back?

[@Chris-mm5gi]

Without the square minute hand and at 3200$, I’d like this watch. But not at 5000$. My new Squale Montauk has an SW 200 (non certified) movement and is running within chronometer spec. I may have just gotten a good one, but given what this gets me for 600$ I can’t see the new Superocean being worth 8x, even with the Breitling branding.

[@bobhob35]

I completely agree and that’s why I bought a squale as well. I bought the militare which is also a no date. No regrets 😊

[@nealweeks6632]

Someone said this watch felt cheep. Did you get that impression?

[@Bredes1]

Tried it on and the size and fit of the 42mm was perfect. Bezelplay was really bad tho

[@solidarnosc9663]

This is one of the slickest watches I have ever seen!!

[@davidlocky8227]

Love your series of videos covering the new SuperOcean -- well done, so thank you! Like many others, I was a little perplexed when I saw the first renderings of this in the spring, believing the design was strange and had fallen short of expectations. However, when the Kelly Slater LE version caught my eye I had a difficult time not seeking more information on that and the other models. The story of the Slow Movement is compelling and I have to hand it to Breitling on a bold and compelling design, including harkening back to the family B instead of the winged B. To be honest, the previous generation SuperOcean never did anything for me with the very large numbers and the textured bezel. However, I'm sold on this and just picked up the Kelly Slater version. Agreed, it is too expensive (though $500 from the Slater version goes to Ocean Protection), but I paid, just the same, and hope to eventually pick up the black on bracelet.

[@krasnaludek298]

Absolutely love this watch; the color, dial layout, proportions … very striking. After the Superocean; the Navitimer 46 in Chrono setup with Black & polished band is my 2nd choice. Also really like the Aviator 8 “Chronometer” in green. 👍🏻

[@Dengis7]

That case it's the same on my Baume & Mercier Clifton Club 🥶

[@baze3SC]

It looks fresh, unlike other dive watches out there. Yeah, the design is a bit polarizing, you either love or hate it but I think it's great. Regarding the movement, my only complaint is the mediocre power reserve. But otherwise you don't need a highly specialized movement to move three hands around the dial. That doesn't make sense from a business perspective. Nor do I want to pay $1000 for routine maintenance.

[@NLWerner]

If it wasn’t for that minute hand I’d be very tempted 😅

[@fakenewsisthenews3542]

So beautiful and I love all the colorways.

[@dillonm4794]

A lumed minutes hand in which the lume is only on a massive square away from the end of the hand doesn’t exactly aid in readability. Very hard to actually know what minute it is when you need that lume, which for a dive watch feels like a silly design element.

[@professorBoulevard]

Is it antimagnetic?

[@derekbrettell8121]

Breitling are doing some good things but this isn't one of them. Plus they're getting quite excited with their prices. I think they need to settle down and align prices with comparable watches such as Tudor.

[@rsavage173]

I bought the Superocean 44 in yellow before the change and glad I did

[@ewnyMetroExpress]

This is great! Indeed this is a controversial model. The two big drawbacks are the date is removed and the price is 30% higher. I'm disturbed after spending almost $6,000 then read many bashing reviews and comments.

[@draakisback]

Yeah dunno. It's a fine watch but then I'm not a huge diver enthusiast (not do I really like brieghtling). I have a black bay ceramic and a submariner from the 80s. Outside of the blancpain fifty fathoms bathyscaphe or a grand Seiko evolution, I just don't see myself getting another diver any time soon. But then I also think I am in the minority in that I specifically go for smaller watches. My daily watch right now is between a zenith captain dual timer and a blancpain leman dual timer (gmt for me is important). Also bought a Omega constellation 38mm during black Friday but am holding off since I pre-ordered a horage supersede.

[@shuycg]

Can't see how this can be competitive. You nod to Omega several times. And you are right to do so. The designs are definitely better than before. Its just not at the right price point. This cannot cost more than the Oris Aquis 400. A stronger brand but lesser internals so lets say they balance eachother out. Materials are the same with a small advantage to Aquis. A sapphire back is more expensive than a steel caseback. Design is subjective. Still there is nothing interesting on the back of the Breitling. I'd choose the Aquis 400 even if the Superocean would cost the same. The Seamaster is an another league.

[@BruceWilliams]

Owned each model you mention. My ranking 1) breitling 2) omega 3) Oris

[@philc1773]

Omega fan boy!......who clearly can't come to terms with a resurgent Breitling and the quality on offer? Oris are.... let's say boring. The movement in the SO brings debate but the rest of the package is top drawer.

[@jimlittle5769]

I have all three. Blue Omega Seamaster 300M, Breitling Superocean Kelly Slater LE, Gradient anthracite Oris Aquis 400. IMO, the Seamaster is clearly the best of the bunch, and then I'd have trouble deciding between the other two. Thankfully, I don't have to.

[@shuycg]

@@philc1773 on the contrary. I'm happy Breitling are coming back up. Mostly due to that new design team they have. And I have already stated that you might consider the design better than Aquis'. But asking 1.5-2k over the Aquis' price, while you use the same caliber as 500 euro watches... Is a bit of a stretch. I hope they'll soon do on the movements side what they've managed to do on the design side.

[@shuycg]

@@jimlittle5769 that's my point. You cant decide between a Aquis and the SO. But then, the are not the same price bracket. Maybe they should be.

[@andreaiacolina]

I really like the design on this new Super Ocean. I understand that it's not for everyone, but I like it. Also I do not have any problem with the Sellita movement, because it's thin and easy to service. But with this movement my only problem is the price... If the price was lower, I could have considered one, but at this price point you have a lot of alternatives that maybe deliver a better value for money. In conclusion: I really like it but I'm not sure about the value for money proposition.

[@tongotongo3143]

And what do you think, which watches would give you better value for money than this model?

[@andreaiacolina]

@@tongotongo3143 if you're searching for a diver with a Sellita movement, for example you have Squale that delivers history, quality and a very well regulated movement. Christopher Ward is another brand that uses Sellita movements and their quality is great. Both with a lower price (around 1.5k). And they're not the only options...

[@tongotongo3143]

Well… then for example Orient Kamasu with in house movement is even better value with the price 400€. Squale and CW aren’t comparable names to Breitling, completely different league.

[@andreaiacolina]

@@tongotongo3143 I agree with you, but anyway with the same money you can buy a Tudor with in house movement. So I personally wouldn't spend this much on this specific Breitling. I would spend even more on a different Breitling model with in house movement or I would buy this only if it was less expensive.

[@tongotongo3143]

Tudor is a very bad brand because it’s “poor man’s Rolex”, and Rolex itself violates human rights so for any sane person it’s a dead brand. In house itself isn’t necessary better than other time proven movements heavily modified by Breitling to COSC standard. In house for the most part is just marketing and manipulation. Today Breitling is experiencing renaissance as it was 20-15 years ago when it was the most desirable brand for most rich men. I agree it costs about 1K too much, but I don’t really see the alternative, except just buying less expensive watches and enjoying them, and there are very good options for 1/5 of the price of this Breitling.

[@rossdev]

Of my small collection of six, three are Breitling Superocean 42. Two of the outgoing (black, orange dial versions) and the newer release with the black dial. The new one is way more blingy than the old, with the polished centre links on the bracelet, the polished indices and deep black glossy dial. The caseback on the new one is disappointing, it's like Breitling forgot about it. Still very much like the outgoing model too.

[@Bruno_Powerlifter]

Wait,breitling are using sellitas? Since when??

[@jefferywong9744]

The dail really suckssss... oversized lum parts looks weird, squares adn cycles mess up together. I miss the old day of Superocean Abyss :( what a shame

[@vicioussky1256]

One of my favourite watches is Superocean Heritage II. That one, a bit more toned down than this one, is so cool. But these are so much fun too. Breitling finally turns things around due to new design team.

[@technoboy21]

The inner part of the indices looks so rough - really bad finishing for the price. I've seen many Ali Express watches with a better finishing for a fraction of this one's price.

[@tangoadvance8393]

The new generation looks way better to my eyes. Looks fresh.

[@robertl8429]

great video. thanks for this review. great coverage of the movement. these ones look like zodiacs, which i like. but at that point a zodiac is 1k$ and these are 3k$. I know zodiacs super sea wolf is actually older than the super ocean. the SSW is the same years as the first rolex diver, if i recall correctly.

[@mrbkkt1]

current gen... I like except the fact that it has a bezel and movement from a 38mm watch in a 44mm case. Ditch the chapter ring, since the bezel makes it redundant, and offer me a date wheel.

[@albertoalvarez1924]

Breitling is absolutely top engineering. Stunning

[@5OclockSharp]

Honestly the 42mm version of this has a form factor that’s about as good as a Sub. If the design wasn’t so polarizing and this had the BB58 movement it would be selling like crazy

[@andrejensen9002]

Love the new Superocean. Hope you will review the bronze models soon 🙂

[@BruceWilliams]

I would love to

[@bluesdog645]

I tend to agree with you Bruce. I have my eye on the Blue & Gold version. What I didn’t like about the previous version was the 12, 6 & 9 Arabics and then a tiny date window at 3 o’clock. It threw the dial off for me. The Longines HydroConquest has the same effect, in my eyes.

[@ctboy4467]

I like the style. More modern looking

[@treasurecoastgypsy]

No lumed bezel!, deal breaker !!

[@vijaymehra1101]

I don't understand the dial....confuses me

[@TheLumeRoom]

That new yellow one is hot!

[@pruteanu6]

4450 EU for a sellita? 38 h power reserve ? NOPE

[@Talon173]

I actually quite liked this in person. Case, clasp, bracelet is a big step up…my main gripe isn’t the dial, it’s the bezel…on the one in store there was a crazy amount of play

[@BruceWilliams]

The three I have filmed have had excellent bezel action

[@Talon173]

@@BruceWilliams that’s good to hear then….hopefully just a bad one I tried

[@jimlittle5769]

@@Talon173 mine too, if that helps

[@russellgooding7475]

I like Breitling's general style. But they are just so poorly priced. If they were 30% less and so competing in a lower segment. They would be very nice watches. But here in the UK at least. You would never buy one at list price in an AD. Not without that 30% discount. They are just over priced, and most watch people know it. You can't compare this type of watch with an Omega. Design or movement wise (especially the latter). I bought an Omega Aqua Terra a year ago and got a very nice 15% discount, and it's a brilliant watch to this day. For a Breitling therefore I would want 45% off list to be anywhere near it... Don't think I can get that. So it's a shame, as aspects of the new designs appeal. But they need to seriously review the bloated price structure frankly.

[@nightstalker824]

Thanks for the review, but it's a no go for me. Definitely a "collection" piece. What I mean by that, is that this watch is for someone who needs something a little different to set off the redundancy of their watches. Even the new black model is a bit too "out there" for me. That said I stumbled upon this video because my local Breitling boutique still has one previous model 42 in black. They have had that thing in their case all year, if they have it come income tax(that's daddy's play time fun money lol) then I might purchase it. I just don't know about the $4200 that I'm sure the boutique will not budge on.

[@Tony-u2y4i]

I’ve tried this on and have to say it sits beautifully on wrist , think it is a well crafted lovely piece .. couldn’t bring myself to buy , Cmon Bruce are you kidding ? 5 grand for a selita movement is a joke … 38 power reserve 0ff the shelf .movement 2 grand overpriced .. why such a blatant cash grab ..?

[@MyVideosWillCalmU]

Nope 🚶🏿

[@speed1281able]

Tudor offers much better value..

[@SIZZO76]

TUDOR IS NOWHERE NEAR THE LEVEL OF OMEGA BREITLING OR ROLEX.

[@terrorrbabbletwo]

Minute hand is obnoxiously large, no counter balance on the seconds hand, chapter ring seems unnecessary and makes the dial look tiny, non in-house movement, and the MSRP lol. I like Breitling but this ain’t it. There are MUCH better options at this price and even $1-2k cheaper!

[@waynedennett9064]

I actually quite like the design, i do think the second hand should have a sq lume pit to match everything else and i do think its expensive given the moment. You can buy a Sellita or Eta based 300 metres watch for a lot less

[@BruceWilliams]

True but not a certified chronometer with this level of finish in this killer of a design

[@watchroll3310]

I think the reason why breitling is using a sellita is because their name is big enough for the regular consumer that doesn't know about watches to still sell a lot. Is more profitable and they can get away with it.

[@Mpantiques]

It looks like 200€ watch, they f….ed it up with new design and logo.

[@tangoadvance8393]

It really doesn’t…….

[@darioz5894]

What an outrageous statement, you have no idea what you're talking about LMFAO

[@Mpantiques]

It realy does.

[@Mpantiques]

Outrageous? Why? Becouse you are fanboy? I held it in hands, this watch like many of new breitling watches looks and feels like cheap trash.

[@darioz5894]

@@Mpantiques has nothing to do with being a fanboy and everything to do with reality, while you seem to base everything on your bias, emotions. For under 6K this is an awesome, sexy time piece.

[@dingodave3966]

Nice watch

[@Tom_H327]

Brietling is not even on my radar. If they had even one watch that could hold my interest longer than a minute, it would be different, I suppose. I guess the Super Ocean comes close, but it just reminds me of every other brand. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@adilrahman1204]

Chronomat with the bullet bracelet?

[@colincelso9428]

I love the colours of the new super ocean but like a lot of people the price tag stops me pulling the trigger. Also I love the blue but in my experience white and silver hands on a pale blue dial are not very legible in certain light.

[@luxuryfood3810]

I don’t know how much breitling pay you but this watch is crap. Starting with the price.

[@meneurb]

Breitling is the best brand.... quality, luxury, price, endurance, heritage....

[@KeithBeacham]

That huge square on the minute hand and the fat chapter ring....just no. I don't like this at all.

[@jdcmendiola]

Not a fan of the new superoceans and specially the new case backs . I much prefer the super ocean II with there busy dials and just a more toolish robust look compared to this.

[@MischkaMunich]

Not my watch, cause of the missing inhouse movement!

[@Smithy67]

The watch face itself is tiny, like a kids watch.