Tudor Black Bay Chrono vs Pelagos FXD Chrono Cycling Edition

[@richardmorris6365]

Both,have the Panda on an Everest rubber strap, great watch.

[@Risayogi]

As both road cycling and watch enthusiast, this watch is very tempting for me. Large diameter is useful to see the time at a glance while cycling, and as most road cyclists are weight weenies, being lightweight is a good plus for us.

[@paulbrown2422]

I think it is very cool that they make the cycling edition.

[@EdmundPorter-ju8kd]

I recently tried on the cycling chronograph just for fun. I have 7.75” wrist & I really liked the feel and look. The red is an original color and not at a garish.

[@astrostl]

FXD for sure

[@robertlock6041]

I'd be interested to know how shatter proof the carbon case is. I'm not a racing cyclist and don't need a chronograph, but a standard FXD MN would be would suit me. You're not crazy! The cycling Pelagos looks great...

[@BRMIV]

I'm always drawn to Panda/Reverse Panda dials, so I would take the 58. But I'm with you on the size-in a smaller case it would be a stronger candidate for me.

[@yukonthornsaengsanoh7942]

I like the carbon one, but really want Tudor let it has a see-though case back.

[@feisty8]

Cycling Edition .. No Doubt about it.

[@TheCdM1981]

Pelagos at 43mm is too big for every day wear. Intended to be an active wear watch. Always the BB chrono for the win.

[@DanielDahl-i9p]

Fixed lug is a deal breaker

[@scottlynch5804]

I agree that the cycling Pelagos looks better on wrist.

[@tschoy9388]

The cycle Pelagos if better. Much lighter.

[@tvo6453]

I hate light watches…so chrono SS for me

[@ianwoollard2063]

Both are a hard no for me.