Jordan Peterson: “There was plenty of motivation to take me out. It just didn't work" | British GQ

[@pitfighter871]

52:47 There is a visible edit-cut here. Vote this up so people recognize they removed his response.

[@keyboardwarrior9177]

Well that's damning

[@daviddibonito2260]

Yes, it seems you are correct. I had thought the continuity seemed disrupted but didn't give it enough thought til I read your post. thank you for pointing this out. Wonder what exactly they were afraid to let viewers hear and wanted to cut out.

[@navindudissanayake9883]

He made her cry after that idiotic opinion about what hierarchy is.

[@psychcowboy1]

@@navindudissanayake9883 Agreed. Peterson's opinion on hierarchy is idiotic.

[@vovozaum]

@@psychcowboy1 you cant even read, can you? You are such an imbecil that you think your opinion on hierarchy is more valid than the findings of a scientist...

[@tlawhon]

"Privilege is a problem!" "Give up your privilege, then..." "I don't want to."

[@aeternusdoleo4531]

White Left in a nutshell, ain't it.

[@ZehManelCigano]

@@aeternusdoleo4531 White left? Racist

[@ZehManelCigano]

@Gophuck Urself is it not enough? What else are you

[@AZDC99]

@@ZehManelCigano You are wearing out words like "racist" and "sexist" to the point where they mean nothing AT ALL anymore. Keep on going! (Proud white MAN here...sue me! Had enough of you getting overpaid for jobs you can't even do over me. Feminism equals cancer!!)

[@ZehManelCigano]

@@AZDC99 im a white male. Please educate me. What is the difference between black left and white left

[@johnfields4414]

She's doing her best but Jordan is ON FIRE here. Yet in a very controlled way. What a joy to watch.

[@psychcowboy1]

@@johnfields4414 No one can find a Peterson win.

[@David.S.]

this "interview" took a lot out of Peterson, took him a few days to recover. His words. And yes, Jordan's firing on all cylinders.

[@psychcowboy1]

@David.S. No one can find a Peterson win.

[@yolomcswaggens9482]

@psychcowboy1 See his book reviews. Or watch the vid above, at least.

[@psychcowboy1]

@@yolomcswaggens9482 I agree JP was rude and got intellectually destroyed in this video.

[@matthewcb1970]

This was like watching someone trying to stop a tank by throwing stones at it.

[@JP-lj2lq]

A toddler arm wrestling a giant

[@hermanmelville3871]

Perfect analogy.

[@jonathangarzon2798]

Saving Private Ryan against the tank

[@jojoexperience]

Or blocking roads just coz your favorite candidate didn't get elected

[@grantpickens2704]

You mean tampons

[@MsZombiechews]

Looks like they forgot about equality when it comes to microphone quality

[@nukepizzaa]

Microphone equality!

[@amut6647]

they did that on purpose cuz their argument is so weak

[@j_freed]

You do hear his mic in the later part of the interview. They may have forgotten to turn it up earlier, which could mean they never tested their equipment before beginning their work.

[@Aaron-mj9ie]

I wish you could have seen my reaction to reading this. I almost spot soda all over my desk.

[@vovakrivbass]

Dude she is writing book about feminism.

[@awsomesauce73]

"How would you like to be remembered?" "As someone honest" Absolute gold.

[@MrAvaraa]

Total excellence imo too.

[@joshuajim65]

Natives Americans arent filthy rich

[@AndrewWilliamSpence]

@@joshuajim65 define rich

[@firerrhea1086]

JP takin this tryhard to school. She gets cred for trying though

[@robmarrin6720]

Funnily enough he went through an epiphany and re-evaluated himself and wether most of what he said was ego and then realised that he sometimes had in the past said something that he didn't believe so a lie and it changed him there's videos on here on it, it takes an honest person to admit that they may have been wrong in the past,, I know someone will ask define honest 😉

[@mcv5705]

His eye contact says so loudly, "I'm onto you...and I'm not falling for it."

[@psychcowboy1]

@@mcv5705 no one can find a Peterson win.

[@True38]

@@psychcowboy1 He has won 10 out of 10 times so you're wrong.

[@tskitishvili3]

You forgot "bucko"

[@psychcowboy1]

@@tskitishvili3 No one can find a place where Peterson outsmarted Helen Lewis.

[@tskitishvili3]

@@psychcowboy1 other than this video we're commenting on? 😭😭😭

[@tianna1116]

“If you hire a plumber, and he happens to be male, it’s not because there are roaming bands of tyrannical plumbers....” I died laughing

[@junit7590]

😅😅😅😅 funniest sentence ever

[@avelineb8239]

Me too lol...

[@MiguelBaptista1981]

We need new Monty Python's, they would have absolutely no trouble coming up with 10 seasons of material, just by 2020 alone.

[@justinmiller5660]

@@Estrogen_intolerant notice how it's only high paying jobs women are mad about being male dominated. Don't see them calling for more female trash collectors.

[@154421535]

He is so funny. Love him.

[@ellerykingston1077]

"how would you like to be remembered?" "As someone honest" That is something everyone can respect.

[@JPMNRB]

Love it! What minute of the interview does he say that?

[@james.e.sharpiii]

1:40:52

[@james.e.sharpiii]

@@JPMNRB I think it's her last question...

[@jackgreenway4646]

@Hana Ayo Alemayehu You cant have watch this GQ video, everything that video you linked which is out of context got stomped out in this video, watch the videos before linking them you idiot ahahhaha!

[@peacefulambiance9064]

@@jackgreenway4646 it's a bot

[@piyushsharma8515]

when he said "READ MORE" man that was some extreme burn moment

[@Amphibian67]

piyush sharma more like extreme BRUH, am I right?

[@piyushsharma8515]

@Justin Last true

[@lossantosmalakozemonia3196]

DUDE!!BRUH!! THIS WAS FIRE!!

[@duffinthemuffin5792]

I like how they did that was to immediately paint him in a bad light

[@cwg9238]

jordan peterson is pretty much the kwai chang caine of the academic world

[@lftr_react]

I have never seen someone as well armed in a debate as Jordan was here. It was virtually astounding to see how stable the footing is for him. To have that depth of knowledge and this level of access to it is a rare and amazing spectacle.

[@psychcowboy1]

@@lftr_react No one can find a place where Peterson outsmarted Helen Lewis.

[@stenhendrix8538]

​@@psychcowboy1 I've read a lot of your comments constantly repeating your request for a list of examples in which Dr. Jordan Peterson outsmarted Helen Lewis. I would deem it highly probable that you are going to ask me the same thing right after reading (or who knows, not reading) my comment. I'll try to explain this once for you, even though many have already tried. I won't provide examples. So go on, don't read the rest of my message and reply the same thing you've replies to everyone. To address your repeated request for specific examples of Dr. Jordan Peterson "outsmarting" Helen Lewis, I’ll first clarify the context and meaning of "outsmarting." A commonly accepted definition is: "to defeat or get the better of someone by being clever or cunning." However, the point many are making isn’t necessarily that Peterson defeated Lewis in a manipulative or cunning way (outsmarted). Rather, the suggestion is that Helen Lewis employed certain rhetorical tactics or attempted to misrepresent his views during their conversation. Despite these attempts, Peterson demonstrated intellectual clarity and composure, effectively sidestepping the traps she laid. This is what many are interpreting as him "outsmarting" her-not through trickery, but through intellectual consistency and the verbal ability to lay out again and again his basic principles of thought and his basic beliefs despite Helen trying to twist them. Helen Lewis often tried to frame Peterson's arguments in a way that could be perceived as extreme or socially unacceptable, potentially painting him as untrustworthy or harmful. Such framing could have serious consequences for Peterson’s public image and even his personal life. Yet, Peterson repeatedly countered these attempts by returning to the core of his arguments, refusing to be mischaracterized or cornered into positions he didn’t hold. That is the reason he may incidentally interrupt her, he corrects her when she is speaking incorrectly of him or his arguments. This avoiding of rhetorical pitfalls and preserving the integrity of his arguments under pressure is what many consider Peterson "outsmarting" Lewis. It’s less about cunning manipulation and "winning the conversation" and more about intellectual resilience in the face of adversarial questioning that is not at all part of genuine and open curiosity and debate. I'd like to repeat I expect your reply asking about the outsmarting examples. I won't list the examples as your question is wrong, Peterson fundamentally didn't "outsmart" her. I believe I did you one better. Because a true understanding of what I just wrote might enable you to find the right examples you are looking for yourself.

[@lftr_react]

​@@psychcowboy1 I know...well, unless you watch them speak. Lewis is a superficial first order thinker. She and her ilk cannot regard nuance or counterintuitive aspects of a system. This is why you see her regard wage gap as an issue of gender. She is unable to regard even a single layer down to the actual reasons for disparity. If we take a second example with the lobster, we see that she is unable to grasp the corollary aspect that Jordan is regarding. 'They urinate out of their faces' she proclaims. As if this has anything to do with the subject. She can't get past the very first aspect of the chosen example, which is that it is a crustacean. A child thinks in this way. I am a high school graduate & I could 'outsmart' this woman. What this illustrates is that it is no great feat to outsmart a person with Lewis's brand of deficiency. If you're having trouble finding a place where Jordan outsmarted Helen, you may be struggling with the homogeneity of her defeat which offers less contrast for which to point out a particular spot. Fans of 1st order thinkers tend to be 1st order thinkers themselves. Such types need high contrast to anchor their opinion upon (and then get it wrong for lack of depth). Not to worry, I can help you. Look at the timeline of this interview and click on a spot at random. There, you found a place. Glad I could help you out. Good talk.

[@lftr_react]

@@psychcowboy1 I know...well, unless you watch them speak. Lewis is a superficial first order thinker. She and her ilk cannot regard nuance or counterintuitive aspects of a system. This is why you see her regard wage gap as an issue of gender. She is unable to regard even a single layer down to the actual reasons for disparity. If we take a second example with the lobster, we see that she is unable to grasp the corollary aspect that Jordan is regarding. 'They urinate out of their faces' she proclaims. As if this has anything to do with the subject. She can't get past the very first aspect of the chosen example, which is that it is a crustacean. A child thinks in this way. I am a high school graduate & I could 'outsmart' this woman. What this illustrates is that it is no great feat to outsmart a person with Lewis's brand of deficiency. If you're having trouble finding a place where Jordan outsmarted Helen, you may be struggling with the homogeneity of her defeat which offers less contrast for which to point out a particular spot. Fans of 1st order thinkers tend to be 1st order thinkers themselves. Such types need high contrast to anchor their opinion upon (and then get it wrong for lack of depth). Not to worry, I can help you. Look at the timeline of this interview and click on a spot at random. There, you found a place!

[@lftr_react]

@@psychcowboy1 I know...well, unless you watch them speak. Lewis is a superficial first order thinker. She and her ilk cannot regard nuance or counterintuitive aspects of a system. This is why you see her regard wage gap as an issue of gender. She is unable to regard even a single layer down to the actual reasons for disparity. If we take a second example with the lobster, we see that she is unable to grasp the corollary aspect that Jordan is regarding. 'They urin*te out of their faces' she proclaims. As if this has anything to do with the subject. She can't get past the very first aspect of the chosen example, which is that it is a crustacean. A child thinks in this way. I am a high school graduate & I could 'outsmart' this woman. What this illustrates is that it is no great feat to outsmart a person with Lewis's brand of deficiency. If you're having trouble finding a place where Jordan outsmarted Helen, you may be struggling with the homogeneity of her defeat which offers less contrast for which to point out a particular spot. Fans of 1st order thinkers tend to be 1st order thinkers themselves. Such types need high contrast to anchor their opinion upon (and then get it wrong for lack of depth). Not to worry, I can help. Look at the timeline of this interview and click on a spot at random. There, you found a place!

[@someaccount659]

“I feel very privileged for my job” “Then quit” “Nah”

[@ripperfisher182250]

she isn't so guilty of her privileged position, but can criticize others for theirs lolol. Of course there is some factors that may affect "privilege," but dedication and passion goes a lot further than your skin color or gender... something msm seems to sweep under the rug.

[@Frank2489]

😂🤣😭

[@Insect0man]

She's a product of the same self-loathing/worshiping culture that manufactured Patty Hearst.

[@Insect0man]

@@ripperfisher182250 Dedication, passion, and competence. Criminals are generally incompetent and thus unable to compete honestly, hence THEIR manifestation of the so-called "patriarchy" - which only exists today in the context of socially engineered unlawful disorder... which benefits the incompetent, and those who feed on them. Donald Trump and the plethora of tribal organized criminal goons circling in his orbit demonstrate how that works.

[@Insect0man]

She is the brainworks of the farm. Are you not aware, sisters, that it is for your benefit that she eats all the apples and drinks all the milk!?!

[@SergeDufresne]

“Human beings are born with different capacities. If they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free.” - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

[@sbaumgartner9848]

Good quote.

[@hashtagspandas4070]

👏

[@dolphin-studio]

Capitalism vs Communism basically

[@TheMoonlightCraftsman]

That is perfect

[@Chrisuperfly1]

Solzhenitsyn definitely knew a little about freedom, and a whole lot more about a lack of.

[@yonethazine]

"Can’t wait to not buy her book”. GQ deleted this comment around several times now. Let’s keep this comment alive.

[@yonethazine]

@Serpant Stepper i love you more

[@elsievaenz9531]

Dumb comment Just do it ! No need to tell the world what you aren’t going to do

[@crisbowman]

@@elsievaenz9531 That's actually the only need to comment such an announcement.

[@jopoveromo1054]

@@elsievaenz9531it’s a statement, people are tired of being lied to and attempted brainwashing by democrats.

[@joeb5230]

Interviewer: This is what you're saying. JP: No, it's not. Interviewer: Well, this is what you mean. JP: No, it's not. Great job. Truly, great job.

[@psychcowboy1]

@@joeb5230 No one can find a place where Peterson outsmarted Helen Lewis.

[@NumberSpace]

Jordan: "Then why don't you give up your 'priveleged' position?" Woman: "Because I don't want to"

[@spherex6523]

Clear evidence of selfish and unwise feminist.

[@reidsimonson]

Cognitive dissonance at its best. Everyone else give up your privilege but me. Also who is the privileged one here? The white European or the Canadian Native American? Hmmm who exploited who for centuries?

[@tomdwyer9917]

oh yeah.. that one stops these people in their tracks. lol

[@roccprofit]

Of course it's easy to say someone else needs to give something up. Typical of these people to not want to give up anything themselves. Hypocrites.

[@securityforce3789]

I know feminist hypocrite

[@SunlightSpeaking]

His patience is next level! Why do interviewers keep reinterpreting things he states clearly?! He deserves a medal for dealing with so much nonsense.

[@psychcowboy1]

No one can find a JP win.

[@sateeshmaharaj9730]

"Lorrdd Fadda😂"

[@penultimania4295]

He's just high on drugs here probably

[@psychcowboy1]

@@penultimania4295 Helen won most of the points.

[@treydogg4690]

@@psychcowboy1JP got you worked up for 3yrs straight 😂

[@jaydonaldson3410]

“I can’t wait to not buy her book.”GQ deleted this comment around several times now. Never let this comment die.

[@amarg.247]

Understood

[@W.W-z3x]

😂😂

[@King_Crown-x7p]

Viva la revolution!

[@W.W-z3x]

@@King_Crown-x7p why would an american say that?

[@King_Crown-x7p]

@@W.W-z3x :0 … :| u right.

[@niravpratap5428]

Every once in a while I come back to watch this masterpiece.

[@psychcowboy1]

We have a project going to see if anyone can find a spot where JP outsmarted Helen. So far no one can find one.

[@cyclicozone2072]

@@psychcowboy1 When she admitted she holds her position due to privilege and Peterson pointed out her hypocrisy for keeping it. God you libs are coping 😂😂😂

[@psychcowboy1]

@@cyclicozone2072 Did you find any JP wins yet? 33:30 H: The US was founded on identity politics, full political rights for white males. J: It is absurd to say the US was founded on identity politics. J: Let's get our definitions straight, you can't lump all unequal treatment as identity politics. H: Politics based on identity is the definition of identity politics. J: That is not the definition of identity politics. You can't say that people's proclivity to identify with their group is identity politics. Identity politics is nested in Marxism and post modernism. [Let's unpack this: HELEN CORRECT: The US was founded on identity politics, full political rights for white males. JORDAN WRONG: J: It is absurd to say the US was founded on identity politics. JORDAN STRAWMAN: J: Let's get our definitions straight, you can't lump all unequal treatment as identity politics. HELEN CORRECT: H: Politics based on identity is the definition of identity politics. JORDAN WRONG: J: That is not the definition of identity politics. JORDAN WRONG: You can't say that people's proclivity to identify with their group is identity politics. Identity politics is nested in Marxism and post modernism. (JP is saying that BLM and jewish zionism isn't identity politics? Score for Helen!]

[@psychcowboy1]

@@cyclicozone2072 I agree, you can't find any Peterson wins!

[@cyclicozone2072]

@@niravpratap5428 “I could but I won’t” Helen Dunce Lewis on holding her position of privilege. Peterson trounced her 😂

[@wokewoken192]

Apprentice journalist: "I've read bits" Jordan Petetson: "Read more"

[@hzuiel]

The problem is that she is expanding the term alt right to encompass people who it does not apply to, and then saying "look at these alt right people who like your work."

[@MisfitMindset]

Epic reply.

[@Papa-fv1rn]

Yes, I liked that bit!

[@CoreyJayB]

JORDAN PETERSON DESTROYS FEMINIST WITH FACTS AND LOGIC :D

[@edwardvaughan1814]

Lose definition of alt right...haha

[@teravega]

1:08:29 "I'm not hearing what you think, I'm hearing how you are able to represent the ideology that you were taught. It's not that interesting because I don't know anything about you, I can replace you with someone who thinks the same way, and that means you're not here. That's what it means." Man that...right there, was a mic drop. NPC

[@ballin1394]

It was the best line I ever heard used against a liberal...

[@InputSpark3]

When did he say this?

[@64kdawg]

Yeah it was deadly, mic smash

[@ReubenRosczyk]

1:08:29

[@JELB1960]

Her conversational style got a bit better after that.

[@siu281]

Its nice to see so many women saying positive things about him in the comments

[@sunnydlight2375]

The world is waking up to several problems of the past 2 decades that have been cancer to all of us: 1.) Social Media induced attention-seeking millennial junkies all chasing validation and dopamine kicks. 2.) Rabid Modern Feminism gone mad, trying to destroy all pillars of a functional society. 3.) Narcissistic Sociopaths that normally follow 1 and 2.

[@oscarorozco1137]

woah woah... how do u know they are not men transitioning to a women...... hahah a little mirco agression right there.

[@skj158]

Did you just assume my gender??

[@potatitis6441]

Perhaps they don't belong in the kitchen...

[@thehill8353]

It's particularly straight women as opposed to the alphabet soup which that woman is a part of.

[@narayanson77]

We all come to an end eventually. He is 62, so we still have time with Jordan. I hope another Jordan Peterson is out there ready to expand upon his knowledge to take his place.

[@okasart]

No one can take his place; however, I’m confident there are more brilliant minds out there willing to share their insight and knowledge like jordan :)

[@eury5405]

HER: "I've definitely read bits" HIM: "Read more." 😂😂😂😂

[@strikerron2252]

she just got destroyed by 2 words

[@khuszar6778]

Eury lol

[@bakerfresh]

It baffles me you don't think exactly like me?!?....really, of all the things to baffle you.

[@stoicspartan01]

*read more* BAM! haven't laughed that hard in weeks

[@eury5405]

@@Toodream I caught that too....what a smug broad.

[@bradendredge6809]

“How would you like to be remembered?” - “As someone honest.” What a man.

[@emirozdemir2037]

yeah says clean your room, addicted to pills...

[@Mr.Haveaword]

pro-conversation

[@tostitosfritos1748]

robert fripp he’s not perfect you’re definitely addicted to something aren’t we all

[@emirozdemir2037]

@@tostitosfritos1748 yep.. but i don't make millions posturing to insecure males..

[@tostitosfritos1748]

robert fripp it’s business...

[@blakog949]

In retrospect, knowing the health crisis he is going through during the time this interview was done, this man is incredible. His precision with word choice and ability to follow an argument and stay on topic even though the host constantly pivots anytime she feels pressed on a point he is making. It’s incredible. This man is a genius. Not only a genius but beyond patient, humble AND gracefully explains every point he makes regardless of how she try’s to so blatantly portray him in a terrible way.

[@charlie7286]

“I can’t wait to not to buy her book.”GQ deleted this comment around several times now. Never let this comment die - Doing my bit

[@dhaqabk4022]

The hero we need

[@vincem1957]

why is this identical comment re-posted by 3 different people..she's an educated idiot!

[@polarlab113]

@@vincem1957 that she is my friend intelligence and education don’t necessarily go hand in hand

[@josemanuelzamora4949]

The hero we never knew we needed

[@AB-ju1ii]

"I can't wait to not buy her book!!" 😁😁✊✊💯💯👏👏

[@lynnlee8194]

This video was put out 5 years ago and now in 2023, Identity politics are just spreading like wildfire especially in the university scene, freedom of speech is under threat. Jordan Peterson was spot on about it. Listening to him calms my mind.

[@Lilhaggis747]

It can be quite discouraging to see how identity politics are spreading. But I think people are waking up and realising how bad it is getting. I have hope for the future.

[@wingloading]

I'm where she described him as calling his description as apocalyptic terms. I need to check back in on this in another 5 years.

[@Bewefau]

Alex Jones been saying sense 1999

[@AB-ol5uz]

it was spreading like fire when they had this conversation - it's been spreading for over 10 years.

[@NatureWithPamela]

Yes!!!!!!

[@JohnDoe-zu2cm]

"What are you selling that people are buying?" "Truth."

[@DeathSpellXVI]

BS

[@buklau8755]

Chad

[@alexandras8209]

New titled “Jordan Peterson defending his rational beliefs for an hour and a half”

[@kje5120]

@@DeathSpellXVI Nah JP is accurate on most things he says

[@diggie9598]

@@DeathSpellXVI That's your argument? You need to try way harder.

[@cielomcmeekin7296]

This man is an absolute gem

[@jshepard152]

I can listen to Peterson almost endlessly.

[@topologyrob]

Only to those who find thinking frightening

[@yolomcswaggens9482]

@topologyrob I don't think the interviewer was too fond of him.

[@psychcowboy1]

@@yolomcswaggens9482 No one can find a place where Peterson outsmarted Helen Lewis.

[@leftygambinoTenno]

Helen Lewis: Im gonna bait Jordan Peterson Jordan Peterson: Hold my lobster

[@sawyermade5469]

best comment on here, not sure why it doesnt have more likes.

[@3L3CTR0static]

Made my week!!!!

[@jcmoney11111]

@@sawyermade5469 only 3 days old as of now. Haha. Doing pretty good.

[@amazinglyaverage590]

Almost burst out laughing lol

[@summittaedae2323]

I properly laughed reading this comment. Thank you 😂.

[@mairuzo]

“I’ve read bits on the internet-“ “Read more.” Starting out with a whopping left hook.

[@ThatRipper]

Why did I click that !!!

[@willieeetmioutt716]

🤣

[@noremac4807]

Yes, quite brilliant!!

[@myrinw1598]

* Right hook

[@joemcalister7105]

She said she's read the alt right "enjoying" his work so he says read more. What? So he does admit the alt right do use his work and is saying ignore that and look at the others who enjoy his work who aren't alt right. What kind of comeback is that? He just admits it and says but don't just look at the bad guys though. The issue she's trying to bring up is whether he's at all responsible for encouraging the alt right so saying 'but there are others too' is besides the point. I feel like I misunderstood or just disagree that that is a 'whopping right hook'.

[@ThatGuyJulio]

I’ve watched this video in its entirety 5 times over the years, and now starting my 6th. Every time I watch it I hear something new. This was a Masterclass from Dr. Peterson. The way he carefully chooses his words to get his points across despite the vitriolic questions is amazing!

[@mikeygee7]

Spoiler alert: JP remains the undefeated champion of logic.

[@syrupNpankakes]

SHOCKER!

[@halcyon6098]

Hows he doing? Has been sick; last i heard. Like im not on the internet to find out..

[@keithg5187]

Halcyon ur smart for not being on the internet. Hope he’s well

[@tonysand69]

Then you don't know Zizek

[@harshdeepsingh9028]

𝟾:𝟺𝟻, ᴛʜᴀᴛ’s ᴛʜᴇ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ᴀ ʙᴏᴏᴋ ᴡᴀs ᴇɴᴅᴏʀsᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴀ sᴇᴀʟ.

[@Darthmgtow]

I am not buying her book....thanks a lot Jordan my man.....

[@marianhernandez6655]

"Priviledge is a problem" Then give yours to someone less priviledge" "No."

[@sephy980]

i dont want to. someone else should.

[@stephensenior6825]

I was wondering if someone else besides me caught that. Well done!

[@charlesomalley9564]

@Drew Down Sure it is. Why not? She can easily resign and let someone "less privileged" have her position.

[@enesduraku6087]

@@charlesomalley9564 The good ol' lets be charitable with the money of the others logic in full display here.

[@charlesomalley9564]

@@enesduraku6087 Exactly, and in this case it's even worse than that! She sees herself as immune (enlightened ally) while professing that others renounce their "privilege" because they are using it in a manner she does not like. If she ever gets what she's asking for, she will lose everything with the rest of us. I can't imagine that she has any children, otherwise how could she promote their genocide? This is subversion of a society in real time.

[@lg8365]

I am female and Jordan Peterson is right on!! Love this man!

[@clairee4939]

Same.😊

[@cheeseisgud1152]

This video is two years old, and I can still find comments from five minutes ago

[@damonmagness4681]

Literally

[@Geeisjudied]

Yesssirrr

[@jaymethomas7109]

What’s your point?

[@cheeseisgud1152]

@@jaymethomas7109 I just thought that it was interesting. Most videos this old don't attract very many comments.

[@kylemenos]

I have no interest in these topics from what i view on youtube but the algerithm brought me to this video through an extension I use to auto play youtube while i lay in bed. If you've experienced 'click here to continue' on a video in the last few years you know what i'm on about but the point is that this is what KZbin wants you to see.

[@JJims7]

JP: You're an ideologue and your beliefs are totally predictable... Interviewer: Yeah RIGHT! Then what do I think about transgender issues? JP: *pauses* I suspect you think gender identity is a social construct. Interviewer: I believe that gender identity is only 99% social construct - GOTCHA HAHAHAHAHAHA!

[@RMTP5]

This starts around 1:09:13 for anyone who wants to see it

[@LordDTwigo]

Lol, funny how she tried to side step that, then right after admit she believes it's a social construct. She just didn't want to admit he knows exactly where she stands on multiple issues without having to ask her because she has never had an original thought in her life.

[@richardprescott9897]

Why do you laugh about a complex issue that requires a considered and complicated answer? Neither has made a joke.

[@joyceburns2613]

Mic drop

[@Millistration]

Hey British GQ, fire your audio guy.

[@kevinc6805]

They probably un-mic'd Jordan on purpose.

[@MarkCuda]

Seriously. First thing I noticed haha

[@Two2onefive]

Did you just assume the audio person is a guy?! Sexist!!!!!

[@gonegeargaming463]

I also noticed that. The interviewer's audio is fine but somehow Prof. JP's audio is messed up. They probably did that on purpose lol

[@briane8286]

They definitely did it on purpose to make her appear dominant at a subconscious level

[@amcorazon698]

I'm a 44 year old mother of two boys and I adore Jordan Peterson. He's so smart and compassionate. How can someone not see that?

[@cadensilver3015]

Sadly, Ms. Corazon, a good number of people "fail" to see what you see; further to that, another good number of people PURPOSELY CHOOSE NOT TO SEE IT, because that is at cross-purposes to their need to RAIL AGAINST what JP "fights for"...

[@veshaw.]

Are you single can I take you out to McDonald's?🥰🥰😘😘😍😍

[@neversurrender6112]

"Is that your theory, eh?" "Yeah." "Well it's a foolish theory." XD

[@quewntenerif616]

"My big problem with the lobster is that it's scientifically... b ollocks" XD

[@Bergerac82]

@@quewntenerif616 Except it isn't, if you're capable of reading and understanding. As was readily proven by his comprehensive defense of the point and her shabby argument from authority (PZ Myers, FFS)

[@CampFireJammer]

My favourite, “I benefit from lots of unearned privileges” Peterson: “Like your job!?” ROASTED and she was totally unaware, haha.

[@thaliagarcia9684]

@@CampFireJammer She wasn't the one being silenced for nearly a minute a couple of times lol, and she had the decency of not saying the patronizing expression 'gotcha', like he did to Cathy. Then again she is intellectually honest, we cannot say the same about him.

[@cantankerouspatriarch4981]

@@thaliagarcia9684, #YaasSisSlayy #JordanManBad

[@OPrincessXJasmineO]

Interviewer: "I've definitely read bits" JP: "Read more."

[@shanesheets2682]

Nnjni n nnnnnnnnnnn nijnnjijninjjnj nnnnnnjnnjinjjnn

[@Gustav4]

She did well not running away crying.

[@yurikendal4868]

Be more honest jp

[@blessingmansallay4559]

I loved that😭

[@mrjpb23]

Yeah it’s pretty hilarious how triggered JP gets when it’s pointed out that the alt-right loves him.

[@kathi3276]

This was painful to watch. The teacher took her to school, but she didn't learn a thing.

[@Chaos1187me]

Fools never listen. They only wait to speak.

[@towerandstar3838]

Bravo

[@TheProOfficial]

If I could, I would give you an award for this comment.

[@courgette3401]

So odd. What did you see that I didn’t. I saw an intellectual debate . And I really enjoyed that. What did you see?

[@Hatleyrocket]

It’s hard to argue with someone who has already thought everything through to the end.

[@PaulWhiley]

This man said all this 5 or 6 years ago ….. he has outrageously deep insight ….. he literally can see the future. This is a powerful way of interpreting the truth around us all. What a guy Jordan P is !

[@vawrielsorna573]

3 years later, who is still enjoy people making fool of themselves with so much determination?

[@girlgrown2696]

ME!

[@leonardoscatizzi6023]

hey there, third time i view this, just a reminder that intelligent and articulate people exists

[@natedukes2729]

I’ve honestly watched this 15-20 times. When he tells her she’s ideologically possessed I grin ear to ear. That may be the best minute on KZbin

[@o0julek0o]

I highly recommend the discussion between Sargon and Thomas Smith. Even if you don’t like Sargon, like me, it is very fun to watch

[@samrahere]

😂🤣🤣💀💀

[@swanofnutella4734]

British GQ can't afford 2 microphones?

[@Althea92610]

They do it on purpose so JBR won't sound clear

[@adhoc302]

@Legendary StarNPC GQ, FHM et al haven't been male focused publications in years. if you look at the large swathe of their ads, they're very much focused towards women.

[@marcosalazar4682]

Have you ever seen the Mics that Mr Lobsterman uses? They're absolutely atrocious.

[@chriswood1821]

Lol exactly what I was thinking.

[@treasuretrovel3816]

Or an interviewer who is a bit easier on the eyes

[@melissaosullivan2]

Speaking as a woman, I find Dr. Peterson's writings and lectures are meaningful for me. And I'm watching on KZbin.

[@jessegimenez5480]

That last part is deep. As someone honest. If he isn’t remembered as honest our fate was less than fortunate in the end. Taking into account that total fascism is the result of dishonesty on a scale that requires mass delusion due to all the lies. Glad I took the time to watch this again after all these years. A reminder as to why I started listening to JP in the first place. I think the work he has done is incredible and he will be remembered as a great in his field, the amount of work he has done expanding jungs work and presenting it to the public is incredible.

[@janterrirocks]

Every Interviewer: I'm hear today with Jordan "Alt-Right" Peterson. JP: "I'm not alt-right" Every Interviewer: But you influence the alt-right JP: "no I don't." Every Interviewer: Well, let's move on..... So, Jordan "alt-right" Peterson, why are you against women advancing in society? Seriously, it's like Monty Python meets Groundhog Day.

[@xmikex902x]

JeremyDRUMS it’s a poisonings he well fallacy, trying to create a negative bias early on around him in the mind of the viewers. It obviously not only fails but backfires every time, yet these ideologues continue to try.

[@chiakum]

18:29 GQ owned. She's filthy rich woman.

[@Enhdros]

Hahaha, gave me a good laugh; Thank you!

[@I1caro]

This sketch has been done a few times at least. Reality lags behind art.

[@I1caro]

@@skair5425 The same thing can be said by people who believe in socialist policies, obamacare, minimum wage but are not marxists or neo-marxists. So you are correct that some of his values are shared by the alt-right. For example they don't believe in the guilt of white men as a fact. He can't just become alt-right for not catering to the some of the left policies. Surely there's a middle ground. I haven't seen anyone ask directly if Peterson is in favour of socialist policies, I wouldn't be surprised if he is.

[@zoshida]

"That's your theory?" "Yeah" "That's a foolish theory" I'm dead hahahhaha

[@granxtheftxaltcoin9644]

I was crying when I heard that 🤣🤣🤣 omg he's such a savage

[@burningdaylight4146]

This was better than half the movies I've seen this year!!

[@5gonza541]

all*

[@leanhanleleanah6929]

ToaToay móviles are trash

[@MFShowtime]

Literally lol

[@QuercusQuest]

Lol

[@webstime1]

@@leanhanleleanah6929 You then haven't watched the right kind of movies

[@JLo-4music]

I think this was a very good interview. One reason why is that they both stood their ground but respected the conversation, they cared for what was said.

[@SSPspaz]

Interviewer: "Do you want to eat women?" Peterson: "Well, we might want to taste them." This has been your out of context moment for the day.

[@nynonimousnynth3844]

timestamp it idiot

[@SSPspaz]

@@nynonimousnynth3844, I owe you nothing you freaking ingrate. For everyone else, @50:46

[@peterfitzpatrick7032]

@@nynonimousnynth3844 if u actually watched the vid u wouldn't need a timestamp... idiot !! 😅😅

[@themayqueen666]

His real name is Dr. Jordan Lecter

[@gargoyle1850]

@@nynonimousnynth3844 ur dumb

[@Crushbandido]

funny how Peterson’s audio is extremely low compared to the interviewer, but his words ring louder and full of meaning.

[@MrKlotzi123]

Deleting Comments now? Real mature, british GQ, real mature there...

[@complexunity4533]

But they leave this interview up which is clearly damning to the presenting side’s view 😂

[@Gallowglass7]

@@leiasart4610 You're right it's youtube. They do mix comments around and push comments down if it's a popular video

[@aliway4136]

@@Gallowglass7 you do realize when you leave a comment then you leave and come back your own comment is the first one you see. No matter where youtube pushes it you will always see your own at the top unless the channel deletes then it's just gone!

[@scottstorchfan]

What do you expect from leftist amoebas?

[@GTFBITK]

The guy on the right reminds me of a woman.

[@fernandomartin3207]

I am not buying her book but I am buying two copies of his book, one for reading and the other copy to make him richer.

[@sov19871987]

Would be a great gift

[@kanjikuro496]

@@sov19871987 would like but you got 69 likes i dont want to ruin that

[@gingertrang8686]

What he wants is making people wiser, not him richer

[@shayrenae4139]

Fernando, I adore the way you think.

[@dylangleeson2814]

i second that

[@user-ci9te3yt6t]

If this is his real-time live arguments, think about his comebacks when he's taking a shower!

[@joshuabray37]

LOL, I was thinking pretty much the same. He's so sharp.

[@charlierose5569]

Underrated comment 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@astro39]

😂

[@thegreatinterpreter8382]

Haaaa! Great post! "I'll send you a better / updated comment after I get my shower in."

[@JaxDianne]

Awesome comment

[@leonidemelin1131]

It’s strange to me why no one answered the argument about woman changing name after marriage. It’s not about “ownership”, it’s represent a fact that woman now belong and represent another family and most importantly she will inherit all assets of that family.

[@strangelee4400]

I bought her book! Now my wifes boyfriend has kicked me out of the house.

[@JaneOnTheJourney]

strange lee 😆😆😆

[@shermanrobinson1178]

😄😆

[@ianboyd9723]

That’s not deep, but it is funny.

[@Mikados_Advark12]

You need to stand up for yourself mate and not allow boyfriend to kick you out- man up - don’t be a wimp and weak

[@kanwalhr1781]

😹😹😹😹😹😹 ohhh boy.... it's so deep .... n dark . Sarcasm

[@kabukijo3148]

“I can’t wait not to buy her book.” GQ deleted this comment around several times now. Let’s keep this comment alive.

[@frankschest8584]

She said "I am married" x3. And then "Marriage is an institution of tyrannical patriarchy". I thot "Oh man. Good luck to her husband"

[@stephencarlsbad]

I wouldn't worry too much about him. No doubt they both live in that self-deluded world called the far-left...

[@TSAR373]

imagine being stuck in a marriage like that.

[@pink3puppy]

You can agree to disagree in relationships. it might be possible he changes her mind. It's good to have dreams.

[@nickbrennan3389]

The west / first world countries are full of weird and strange people

[@thespeckler1]

@@TSAR373 More than likely a beta soyboy.

[@wendymacdougall3471]

Dr. Jordan Peterson is definitely one of the greatest minds of our time

[@johntaylor4084]

A feminist being shown a mirror and declaring "that's not me!"

[@Orbert]

“Do you think you’d be less angry if you weren’t on Twitter?” Absolutely. Deleting my account did wonders for my mental health.

[@timsoom7027]

same here, twitter is for people with a 70 iq and lower

[@Emorphiamusic]

social media is pure poison. people are addicted to it. getting rid of social media was extremely liberating for me. i recommend it to everyone.

[@5people829]

@@Emorphiamusic but youtube is social media...

[@denverbroncos4]

Twitter is byfar the worst out of the social medias in my opinion, probably that and FB, but both are so toxic and I see the effects on. people all the time. Its crazy

[@Emorphiamusic]

@@5people829 yea.. true. but i ment like twitter/fb/ig. youtube is slightly less poisoned .. for now.

[@devastatedpigeon6174]

this Peterson is freaking genius. Keep speaking truth, seeking truth, and fighting for it with reason and logic.

[@dfdfdgggjhjjh5081]

What exactly is genius about him. I’ve never heard anything remarkable come out of his mouth. It’s like people saying Depak Chopra is a genius. Maybe it’s because people in Canada are some of the stupidest people on the planet

[@mysticnomad3577]

Agreed, except when it comes to the moon landings and the faking of going to space.

[@mysticnomad3577]

@@dfdfdgggjhjjh5081 I live in Canada and although I agree with his stance on human interactions he is completely out of touch when it comes to faking space or believing that man landed on the moon. All Canadians are not indoctrinated.

[@dfdfdgggjhjjh5081]

@@mysticnomad3577 You could be right, I haven't looked into the moon landing, and the moon landing was not even on my radar with what I was talking about lol

[@mysticnomad3577]

@@dfdfdgggjhjjh5081 Understood. I like Jordan but when he was on Joe Rogan talking about it he had no ammunition supporting his stance. Not everyone is perfect.

[@snailface1981]

I've recently discovered Jordan. I know. Where have I been?! His intellect is simply astounding, literally light years ahead of most of us. Bravo!!

[@psychcowboy1]

No one can find a spot where JP outsmarts Helen Lewis.

[@kumaranvij]

Are you a bot?

[@psychcowboy1]

@@kumaranvij Helen: It makes lobsters more aggressive and humans less aggressive. JP interrupting as usual. No that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive and lobsters more willing to fight, I know my neurochemistry. Score for Helen!

[@BlindOldSage]

​@@psychcowboy1 He said "makes humans less aggressive but more dominant". Six years now you've spent misquoting JP, pointing out "wins" for Helen in what was supposed to be an interview, not a debate. God only knows why you're so invested, but keep doing you I guess 😂

[@psychcowboy1]

@@BlindOldSage Correct, I have pointed out a bunch of Helen wins, and no one can find a JP win. If you find one LMK. Helen: It makes humans less aggressive. JP: No that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive, lets go play neurochemistry.

[@CryptoDatabase]

Her: I think Him: I know Pretty much sums the entire conversation up into a nutshell.

[@reellezahl]

@Skelter He: anger and feelings. She: baffled by how dense this man is.

[@alisondaly5560]

Shows how arrogant he is

[@pp-te5wp]

@@alisondaly5560 wtf

[@pp-te5wp]

@@alisondaly5560 have you watched the video?

[@alisondaly5560]

@@pp-te5wp obviously

[@KINGH4L0]

British GQ and Channel 4 news gave Jordan the chance to be seen by nearly 100 Million people. So glad he handled these interviews so well and kept his cool. An amazing man.

[@treyshaffer]

lol did we watch the same video? I have no clue how he handled this well: he was defensive and throwing ad hominem at her the entire time, calling her foolish, talking over her, and steering the conversation away from any direct questions. I could hardly stomach how ridiculously little he was able to actually debate the topics at hand, even when she would cede points to create common ground. It's absurd and frightening that people see how JBP shoots out random unsupported intuitions and somehow she this as win. Maybe his statements confirm their prejudices?

[@XXPHYSCO113]

@@treyshaffer You are ignorant to a maximum . Random institution? Man's was a Harvard Professor. He was only defensive because he had to be to break down her accusations and fully explain his viewpoints. She made plentiful accusations that characterize JP in a dark light, and it was disingenuous. So he cleared up the grey cloud in the room. So I don't think we watched the same video, I think you stepped on your soap box and never actually listened to the whole hour and a half. To see this debate as if JP lost is just pure Cope.

[@treyshaffer]

@@XXPHYSCO113 I said intuitions not institutions lol. Google the word. Also what's an example of her making accusations that characterize him in a dark light?

[@treyshaffer]

​@@XXPHYSCO113 Also, it's funny that being a Harvard professor is supposed to bolster his credibility, yet he simultaneously claims that all of our higher educational institutions are not credible, which is sorta a contradiction lol. And the woman he's talking to went to Oxford, so it's not like she's lacking in academic pedigree

[@XXPHYSCO113]

@@treyshaffer my bad on the institutions part I skimmed over it first read and was also a bit high, but the whole debate she constantly misquotes and mischaracterizes his words and things he's said in the past and even things said during the interview. The first hour i'd say was very obvious she was on the offensive, but then you see JP defending his character as steering away from the direct questions because you didn't like his answers. Now about your second comment, it's not really about bolstering his credibility in a "look at him he went to harvard so he must be smart" but rather he TAUGHT at harvard. Not just went to, but was employed by harvard, to teach the adult youth. Which gives his statements about our higher educational institutions a bit more validity cause he was apart of the system and was even villainized by it. Now I don't really care where she went to college because comparing a student vs teacher is just a silly counterpoint, no offense to her because she is a smart woman. But just being smart doesn't mean you are automatically right about everything. Same way being a professor doesn't make you 100% right 100% of the time. You need to analyze everything and try to concur a reasonable and logical conclusion based on your own life experiences. It seems you are not listening to what JP is saying but rather are only hearing how he says those things. It seems disingenuous from your part to not really listen to his arguments but rather paint him as some debate bully.

[@theme542]

"you also talk about Nietzsche who was also favored by the nazis" ... come on lady

[@TinyMK1]

@Sarah Die Well, and remember how he said that Nietzsche's sister misinterpreted his works after his death as well. I do remember reading that in a political ideology book I had for class but I don't believe it went into great detail as to what exactly she misinterpreted.

[@4_times_college_dropout_tr24]

sounds like something her favourite feminsts columnist said or her university professor.

[@UrraSergio]

Ignorance is bold. And mother of fanaticism (intellectual blindness, if you prefer)

[@martinsmartians]

Agreed. A prime example of grasping at straws and intellectual LAZINESS. I truly believe she's smarter than that. Ideology clouds the minds.

[@haitebodesu]

I think a lot of the comments are missing the mark on this one. She clearly demonstrated her reasons for bringing it up as a parallel to perceptions of him and whether he felt any responsibility for misuse/misinterpretation of his own words. As I'm sure we've all seen dozens of poorly-informed incels and other people within the alt-right sphere worshiping Peterson for "owning" feminists and other left-leaning ideologues, the question of whether or not he took any responsibility wasn't a reach at all. His response itself showed that, as he was very quick to point out and correct misinterpretation but ultimately admitted to feeling a measure of responsibility for it.

[@patriciahehir3576]

I too love Jordan Peterson. I’m an 84 yr old granny I just love listening to him.

[@carlosmedina774]

she made me want to buy his books

[@cambrositv]

His books are great

[@likeorasgod]

I normally only read nonfiction as he said but been thinking about getting his book too.

[@ez6043]

@@likeorasgod I'm not sure which book you're talking about, but I doubt his book(s) are fiction.

[@muddywitch9016]

Buy Peterson's books and not buy hers. I can't wait to buy Paterson's books and I can't wait not buy this woman's books. This woman who is so genetic, I can't even remember her name!

[@rynor7132]

mic drop lol great comment

[@ChrisHarperKC]

Lewis: "How would you like to be remembered?" Peterson: "As someone honest."

[@bleachbucket9440]

@John Galt I spot a fuckedup teeth leftist britt soyboy.

[@nataliaseweryn]

John Galt you reckon Peterson isn’t truthful?

[@LaidbakZak]

John Galt point out the alleged specific lie and we’ll address it point by point and perhaps we can change your mind or perhaps you can change ours.

[@zanzibar6508]

@@nataliaseweryn don't say "reckon" in typed out comments...please it sounds...dumb...

[@aldenb5878]

Who is John Galt?

[@beatrizmattos2386]

My like is for Peterson, this journalist is not making feminism look any good

[@takarsagafe]

Feminism is already associated with hate, anger, resentment, intolerance, envy, bitterness, misandry etc. etc. in the eyes of most men and a large percentage of women who don't call themselves feminists and don't see men as their enemies.

[@mariaguzman1552]

I admire Dr Peterson, he is Brilliant and has amazing patience with this Radical Feminist. She appears to be very Shallow. She interviews better than Kathy Newman.

[@JevoKitano]

Clever choice.

[@daniel173880]

@@takarsagafe Hey! Why do you think that?

[@SourceCod33]

M B but no body pays attention to traditional and modern, they just see feminists, and the fact that the ideology that feminists have have the possibility of being so wrong like interviewer and then thousands of people follow her shows how bad it is At least have the word mean both men and women, can’t really see how someone who’s never heard of FEMinism would see it and think oh equality im guessing

[@susansuarez343]

I’ll never tire of listening to this interview, especially the beginning when Jordan responds with, “READ MORE!” It still gives me goosebumps everywhere & it sends shivers right up & down my spine like nothing else! 5 years ago Dr. Jordan Peterson had 1.4 million followers on KZbin. As of June 28, 2024, he now has 8 MILLION FOLLOWERS & COUNTING! You’re a great man & mentor to millions Jordan, we love & adore you! ♥️🇨🇦 0:30

[@Stormsong93]

I am so grateful we have such a large fount of information that is easy and free for us to soak up. JP is incredible!

[@trollfacenationalist3653]

Why are the both of us fighting amongst ourselves WHEN WE CAN UNITE AND DESTROY OUR ENEMIES FROM THE CENTER!?!?! >:D

[@dluap75]

Troll face is a genius except what is the center exactly?

[@johnlewis8934]

@@dluap75 I'd like to know what tge center is too

[@trollfacenationalist3653]

Left is Liberals, Right is Nazis.. Center is Globalists dogs? :/

[@Matthew_S_1985]

If you think he's good, listen to RooshV

[@jacobwestcott4536]

He gassed her out, she stopped debating as passionately later in the interview and revealed the holes snd contadictions in her original arguements, well done sir!

[@oriolo99]

shes actually a globalist, wanna be tyrant herself. Calls people with less than her "Neanderthals" 18:39

[@wardsl1796]

@@oriolo99 yes she does. just goes to show how she feels about people who don't agree with her

[@OurPastSecrets]

52:40 I want to know what was edited out at the end of that bit of discussion

[@armoda1057]

quewn tenerif he’s never said anything remotely resembling the straw man you just constructed for yourself. But yeah nice job bud, you really put the straw man in its place. A+.

[@sgordon92]

@@armoda1057 a lot of strawmen seem to get put to rest around Peterson lol

[@wilfredruffian5002]

quewn tenerif is that an echo from the hive mind I hear?

[@armoda1057]

TheRea1Gordon the radical left nut jobs are ideological drones, they’re incapable of thinking for themselves. And the small proportion of academics who dislike him are so blind to how jealous they are of the guy. He is better than them in their niche (academia) and has also left it and become wildly successful outside of it.

[@quewntenerif616]

@@armoda1057 oh really that's interesting because he sure does love a straw man. Like the one he created about the "tyrannical patriarchy" in order to make it easier for him to deny it exists (he failed miserably, btw). So explain to me, since JP is so bad at explaining his own points because everyone "misinterprets" him all the time, what does he mean when he talks about "competence" intead of power imbalances when he talks about white male supremacy?

[@Marlene-hw7nu]

I've never seen or heard anyone like Jordan Peterson before,, really enjoy watching,,

[@gypsygypsy2551]

"We aren't close to putting people in prison for jokes." "What about that guy with the pug." "That wasn't a joke." Jesus these people are frightening

[@walkerjus]

Many people have warned us about this outcome. Jordan and many others tried to talk us out of this, but it's too late. It has become quite obvious that speech is being restricted because those who've taken advantage of the freedom of the press and the first amendment are the last barriers to a full leftist authoritarian regime.

[@nineaxis9941]

@@walkerjus “it’s quite obvious speech is being restricted” what? By online PRIVATE companies that make their own rules? Are you referring to trumps Twitter ban somehow infringing on the 1st amendment? If so, using the Republican view point, they’re a private company, with private rules, upon creating an account you abide by those rules and they can ban whomever they want for whatever they want. Go create your own platform.

[@chilliecheesecake]

@@nineaxis9941 That's an awfully convoluted way of saying you support suppression of freedom of speech as long as you disagree with the other person.

[@TheUplate]

@@nineaxis9941 Which rule did he break?

[@animangacircle]

@@nineaxis9941 Are you saying that private companies can ignore basic human constitutional rights? That's all kinds of bigoted thinking that is galaxy level.

[@electropentatonic]

"You could trade it off with someone that's less privileged, that'd be a start" "I... uh... I don't want to and I won't" Conversation for equity over.

[@localistmagic641]

Conversation for slavery over. Conversation for an 8 hour work day over. Conversation for a 40 hour work week over. Conversation for women's suffrage over. Conversation for Brown v. Board of Education over. Conversation for Romer v. Evans over. If only we had "common sense" throughout our entire history, right?

[@stevek5968]

Just like when asked to define "filthy rich" after claiming she doesn't particularly like them

[@leonelfederico245]

Awesome!!!!! I forgot about that one.

[@jkinder1982]

Yes, every person who has a slight bit of privilege should trade everything they have with a less privileged individual, that's the only way to create equity. What an idiot.

[@roughrider0195]

British GQ's best video of all time is only due to how bad their interview gets owned

[@wyatthennings4327]

Jordan Peterson Slow Roasts a British Ham.

[@QuercusQuest]

Exactly

[@MarcusWellstead]

She is smart but my boy’s wicked smart! Jordan knows his fields of study endlessly and it shows. It also shows that he has chosen his words so carefully in his writing and interviews and after such rigorous though before arriving on that view that he can instantly pick up when his ideas have been misconstrued or shall we say creatively paraphrased to suit an opponent’s argument. And he can pick out his sources in an instant. It’s totally consistent with his own rules. So he practices what he preaches. It’s quite something to witness.

[@jonirving5606]

She fails at every attempt to bait him. Peterson is always ready. She is in over her head with Peterson. And it shows.

[@derekbeck1982]

It's because these people use cookie cutter tactics. They are insanely predictable.

[@dannyw9364]

He’s always on guard to it now. Man is too smart to be caught off guard.

[@BKBader]

Lol she had moped prepared. He didn’t. Did anyone see how long he waited to reply sobetimes?

[@raximousbordo4833]

“I can’t wait not to buy her book “. GQ deleted this comment around several times now. Let’s keep this comment alive.

[@Real_vanGogh]

That last line was simple but still powerful: "how would you like to be remembered?" Jordan Peterson: "as someone honest."

[@kicknadeadcat]

I love his expression at the end it went from a smile To a piercing stab. He was not happy.

[@johnrodgers8457]

We should all be so lucky.

[@MrCmon113]

He is honest to others but not to himself. Hence his defense of Christianity.

[@Raz0rIG]

Taxtro it takes more faith to believe there is no God than to believe in one. Watch Tim Keller’s talk on google for reason for God. Many are indoctrinated to believe religion is just blind faith, there are several reasons for belief on both ends for or against God including very compelling arguments and reason. True faith is when you question your own biases and assumptions rather than just being brought up in a certain mindset and never truly questioning your belief. I say this even to those “unconverted Christians” who claim they saw the truth and turned away from religion.

[@leannemo7382]

@@Raz0rIG >> Not so. Scientifically and logically, people cannot prove a negative; the burden of proof falls upon those who make a positive claim about a belief or proposition. Nothing itself is equal to negative and null/value zero; one cannot provide evidence for nothing/negative/null. Only an absence can be proved, after its existence is established. When a person places faith in a God(s), regardless of religiosity or denomination, they choose to believe so without the burden of proof being met. *That is the point of faith.* You suggest that atheists have more faith than believers; it seems you're confusing the confidence found in *both* certainty and faith. When you state "true faith is when you question your own biases and assumptions”, you’re labeling faith as "true" which implies there is faith that's "not true" or "false", which hardly makes sense. For example, a woman is either pregnant or not; there is no "true pregnant" because there is no untrue or false pregnancy. Similarly, a person has faith (in something/someone) or they do not. Perhaps by relabeling "blind faith" as "true faith", Mr. Keller and you mean to express a "devoted" or "unwavering" faith in God, which makes more sense while also losing the negative connotation of “blind”. But when we personally "question [our] own biases and assumptions" we are simply engaged in self-reflection and self-discovery - an important part of maturity that’s been documented since humankind's earliest written records. If it matters: I believe in God as a sort of hybrid Agnostic-Deist, allowing faith based on personal experience and a bit of logic. The agnostic in me believes that God is currently, scientifically unknowable. The deist in me believes if God exists, there's limited-to-no direct interaction or intervention with humankind, which may explain suffering and various evils...yet there seems to be apparent free will, or at least the illusion of it. Perhaps we're in a simulation after all. :) Cheers!

[@Steve19055]

He’s sharp. No nonsence, straight to the point and brutaly honest. Gotta love this guy!

[@psychcowboy1]

Poor jordy got destroyed in this video.

[@ENachtigal]

When he started to challenge her about giving up her position to someone less fortunate based on what she believes and said she is apart of a higher economic status, then she said she “would not” give up her position. I almost died laughing. 😂

[@amitsaxena4108]

Time stamp?

[@garrison951]

@@amitsaxena4108 17:30

[@I_like_turtles_67]

Yup. Just your typical feminist mental gymnastics. It's easy to accuse others. It takes real character to look at yourself with some humility.

[@guysumpthin2974]

…. So women pressure other women into using makeup? According to her . And Great competent fathers are feminine?? I appreciate her ambition, but she has a LONG way to go with: ethics , respect, anger , wisdom, knowledge … Cant get into heaven by provoking people

[@murderburger1811]

I know right. Bloody golden

[@curtisboyce3849]

"Multiple Orgasms." she spent all week coming up with these deep questions the media could take pull quotes from. he's daring them to stoop low enough to take that single sentence out of the almost 2 hour conversation in which he conducted perfect professionalism. he truly is brilliant.

[@lisarigg5534]

Absolutely

[@randominternetguy3537]

It's really cool that you think so deep about a mistake

[@curtisboyce3849]

@@randominternetguy3537 his smirk would tell anyone familiar with Peterson and a general understanding of mannerisms it wasn't a mistake. you'll understand one day. 🙂

[@randominternetguy3537]

@@curtisboyce3849 and I 100% agree

[@lisarigg5534]

@@randominternetguy3537 have you ever considered the fact you are mistaken?

[@EyePlayDrumsBoi]

The interview aged unbelievably well in just 5 years.

[@blaghmrblafh4348]

Actually, at least comments is enabled, I shall respect the channel for that. The BBC is disgraceful for disabling their video's comments... Especially when they advertise "have your say".

[@suzesiviter6083]

The BBC realised they are so far off public opinion they had to censor speech rather than changing their despicable behaviour.

[@blaghmrblafh4348]

@@suzesiviter6083 v for vendetta suddenly feels like a potential reality

[@MrWackozacko]

Same in Australia with the ABC

[@suzesiviter6083]

Indeed v for vendetta does seem like a plausable outcome in the present times, it wouldnt even need that many people to over throw a government.

[@macdiggitty]

blagh mrblafh this is GQ though...

[@OverLord3693]

Helen: "Do you want to eat women?!" Jordan: "You might wanna taste them" That's the punch line for me.

[@seymourfields3613]

I just about died laughing.

[@alekk2565]

Bruh I read this exactly a minute before he said it! 😂😂😂

[@IlLAD3LPH1A215]

where in that did he say that??

[@KnobCreekBandit]

HOW YOU GUYS GONNA QUOTE THAT AND NOT TIME STAMP!?!

[@samihasarah4406]

Here you all go. Here is the timestamp 50:47

[@yeetyeet-wo4rd]

People trying to twist jordan’s words is so funny. He’s literally the most well spoken person i’ve ever heard.

[@darthimperious1594]

Yeah. I wish I could learn to speak as eloquently has he does. Mostly so that I could get my ideas and thoughts across without them being misconstrued due to my own flaws in communication.

[@yeetyeet-wo4rd]

Erik Cedergren so true. Feel the same way. Whenever i get in an intellectual conversation and i can’t articulate my ideas i get so frustrated.

[@jonathannutt3264]

@@yeetyeet-wo4rd Write down your thoughts on a subject and read them to yourself (not in the moment but on your own time). It's very helpful. I also speak aloud arguments to myself when I'm alone. It helps me articulate what I am thinking and sometimes I surprise myself and arrive at a viewpoint I would not have considered had I not spoke the words out loud. These can be really helpful to put in to practice although it will be uncomfortable and awkward at first (everything worth doing is, in my experience). One pitfall: when you do have a discussion with someone, don't be so focused on what you have rehearsed that you don't listen to what they are saying. (See Rule 9 in Dr. Peterson's book). Anyway, it really helps me :)

[@mariusetternavn6214]

@@darthimperious1594 you can

[@deadlyNytshayd]

Nothing got twisted he exposed him self as the ultra conservative bigot that he is.

[@mwalkerl]

Respect to GQ for uploading this (mostly) unedited interview

[@DaMaster012]

Best part of this whole -pathetic attempt at an intellectual lynching- interview was at 1:08:34, when Peterson says: "I'm not hearing what you think; I'm hearing how you're representing the ideology you were taught. And it's not that interesting, because I don't know anything about you. I could replace you with someone who thinks the same way, and that means you're not here; that's what that means." Jordan Peterson, in his own way, just branded Helen Lewis as an NPC.

[@SHARK_QUASAR]

I find this very funny

[@ErwinRommelNazie]

this comment is gold

[@billeons]

I feel like that's a very important statement he made. I want to know about people and what they actually think. I want to represent my ideologies as I believe and understand them, not as I was taught.

[@mitchslack9613]

Gold star for you

[@Catdaddy510]

Bravo 👏

[@djilyaz]

2020, he is almost prophetic when describing university decline..

[@EFChartley]

My university now has Thomas Sowell's books and I hope the tide turns!

[@gravity111587]

Here is another dangerously accurate one from him: kzbin.info/www/bejne/epa8g35na7V8oqM

[@samikalastaja]

What university, and how? Any specific examples, something that can be measured?

[@gravity111587]

@@samikalastaja Decline into ideological pathology and reversion of places where people learn to think into safe-spaces. The evidence is too overwhelming and obvious to make it worth the trouble of compiling for you. Set out with an open mind and see for yourself.

[@samikalastaja]

@@gravity111587 Well, I guess I need to find the numbers by myself. I would've guessed if the evidence is too overwhelming you could've given me few pointers to actual data.

[@cbskean]

Her smug questioning is so insulting. She is doing to him what she would detest if the roles were reversed.

[@B2727]

She was womansplaining

[@Desmont123]

That's what feminists want tho, they want for men to suffer.

[@summushieremiasclarkson4700]

@Alucard *Dr. Peterson, but yes, your point stands.

[@rebecca2827]

That's the way she thinks. She us promoting what she's so called fighting against. Makes zero sense.

[@rebecca2827]

Roland Wimmer it's tragic. So sad. So against how God intended our relationships to be.

[@vitusoltmanns8099]

I dont think there is a person with more very well aged arguments/interviews then Dr. Peterson

[@psychcowboy1]

@@vitusoltmanns8099 No one can find a Peterson win.

[@leonardodesordi4853]

“I can’t wait not to buy her book”.

[@TranslatedAssumption]

Her poor husband is probably a doormat.

[@apexsmixedlollies]

She’s glad

[@azmtkdzv]

supporting the cause!

[@thereadysaltedcrisp8959]

@@TranslatedAssumption they got divorced 🤣🤣

[@markreale5218]

​@@TranslatedAssumption Oh, no doubt. Just look him up and look at those puppy eyes :)

[@josipvran]

"I don't have to debunk it, you have to demonstrate its existence" Rule number 10: Be precise in your speech.

[@greyaye8565]

its* For precision's sake.

[@josipvran]

@@greyaye8565 Hahaha, a very good point. Usually I spell check because english is not my native language, but mistake happened. Thank you for your observation :D

[@succubus20y]

This comment here my friend just convinced me to buy his book

[@josipvran]

@@succubus20y I'm glad to hear, his books are great, also his youtube lectures are invaluable.

[@imaniushindifanga127]

I totally agree.