Bruce Robinson @ 5x15 - They All Love Jack: Busting the Ripper

[@jharkinsmedia1790]

Bruce is fantastic. I love listening to him in conversation, at events like this.

[@TheDharr]

Superb book. I was stunned by it. Robinson should be applauded.

[@BlackCat-we5eg]

paul harris but he seems confused and confusing

[@duneideannaer5990]

I got this book from fiancée for my birthday after begging her to get me it. I’d watched his interview in Jaipur book festival video and was taken away! I’ve still yet to read it. I’m waiting for my stomach to gain strength lol. Paul Harris is it worth the wait?..........

[@cianpritchard1961]

@@duneideannaer5990 I think it’s worth waiting. Even if he is confusing, you can learn so much in his complexion. Almost a conspiracy of bafflement, the confusion of its confinements. He’s a great guy to listen to.

[@joshuadg78]

Very impressed.

[@stevesandford1437]

Bruce Robinson is a REAL (eccentric) genius. xx SF

[@of1300]

best book ever written on the case. so much new information you have never read about.

[@terrycollett603]

I have this book twice and will read it again. Classic

[@normanmorrow4897]

Absolutely terrific book. Great watch.

[@geofftayloruk]

Incredible book...

[@siradro]

Agreed

[@nigelcarren]

Re 'Curry': Bruce, if ever you have the misfortune to find yourself in France, please look me up. In 2008 I went on holiday by mistake and I am still here. I can think of no better dinner guest and I can cook the best Chicken Shaslik and mushroom-pilau known to all humanity... I am happy to pay for alllllll the booze. Bless you 🏆🇬🇧

[@romeaffair]

Reading this at the moment. Pretty convincing so far.

[@davidraleigh4552]

Stunning book.

[@AngryBlackDogger]

Michael Maybrick was performing on Thursday night 8 november in Redhill Surrey. Mary Jane Kelly was murdered that night, 8 november - 9 november. How could Michael have done that if he was performing that night? Honest question.

[@chriskapinos8734]

Incredible book. I couldn't put it down. Wish it were longer, to be honest. Lol. Knowing what I now know, it all makes perfect sense . I've no reason to suspect Mr. Robinson has any ulterior motives for his conclusions.

[@jamescorlett5272]

No no Only a Hollywood film with the American slant .

[@KirstyKing-v7y]

All your hard work points the finger in the right way !! And yet no one will prove it ? I have watched this video over and over again infatuated years of hard work should prove your point I have read story’s around the same time and they add up if anyone adds different stories up that same year I promise you you’ll hear a similar story

[@NoPainNoGain200]

It took me 15 years.." we were both bum boys at the back" in Romeo and Juliet 1968...

[@hollandproductions4813]

i don't want to take any credit, but I'm sad that I only figured this out today without this book when I didnt know someone had already figured out what I figured out 6 years ago

[@AngryBlackDogger]

Did Maybrick ever confessed or said something about being the Ripper?

[@carmichael3594]

Love his book. I won't touch the ripperligist book's bit Robinsons definitely a great read

[@allisterwhitehead]

I don't think Wallace did kill his wife. The police couldn't reenact the killing in the best of circumstances. The man on the phone wasn't Wallace. Looked more like a framing to me and the real killer walked off. Happens more often than than people would imagine but Robinson should know better.

[@billyellis4670]

Stephen knight already said about being ritually laid out victims.

[@sidmicheals9739]

and your point is what? Bruce already knows this...indeed they may have been ritualistic but the source that told Stephen the killer may have had royal blood was done so as misinformation. Bruce didn't steal this notion he just came to a similar conclusion.

[@357lockdown]

I see the JTR case in a whole new light after reading Mr. Robinson's book. What a wonderful piece of research he put in.

[@rizmark5522]

He read Stephan Knight and then went off on his own tangent!

[@sidmicheals9739]

@@rizmark5522 nah he didnt. Knights theory is easy to rip apart Bruce merely points out that he was correct about parts of his theory

[@rizmark5522]

​@@sidmicheals9739 I know whaT he means, Ive had trouble with that group too.

[@sidmicheals9739]

@@rizmark5522 erm ok?

[@rizmark5522]

@@sidmicheals9739 Hes constantly swearing and talking politics and other topics nothing to do with JTR, its annoying.

[@ULYSSES-31]

It was Alan Moore & Eddie Campbell who explored the Masonic ritualisation of the murders in the comic From Hell. That should be acknoloedged. The idea didn't come out of nowhere.

[@meninpapin]

Actually it was Stephen knight, Jack the Ripper :The final solution during the mid 70's. Alan Moore 's graphic novel is based on the book implicating the Queens doctor sir William Gull in the murders with his accomplices

[@duneideannaer5990]

The Royal myth sold as ‘revelatory evidence’, was given to Stephen Knight to discredit him & make an example of anyone who wanted to solve the identity. Warding off anyone who would dare ‘Out’ a Freemason or as I call ‘em -“Lodgers”. That book ruined Mr Knight’s career as an (credible)author. Bonus fun fact: In light of some of the above, there has only been one Motion picture that has been anywhere near accurate. And that’s the Alfred Hitchcock movie from the 1920’s. Accurate in being that he titled the movie -The Lodger. There Endith the truth.

[@NoPainNoGain200]

There was a technique: not a crucifix... the book is not about the ripping of the guts

[@shanegrant8441]

Maybrick was either queen Victoria son or grandson look at the likeness of queen Victoria husband

[@jimmyjohnston8287]

Chanty rassler.

[@jimmyjohnston8287]

Looks like 'Richard Dawkins'.

[@Stantheman848]

Luckily he was not thick like dawkins

[@Steven-ze2zk]

Lechmere.

[@Stantheman848]

Such a terrible lazy suspect.

[@shanegrant8441]

Micheal maybrick