Tudor vs Omega - Contrasting Two Excellent Brands

[@MasterChronometer]

As someone who has both I don’t know how anyone can argue Tudor is in the same ballpark as Omega. The finishing, the moments the design. Omega is head and shoulders above Tudor.

[@ziminar93]

100% i have both too. And a rolex. Omega = Rolex. Tudor is good but one big step below.

[@sinesaii]

I like Tudor, but I am starting to dislike them. Similarly, I love Omega, but I would hate for them to be anything like Rolex. Rolex is a branding excercise for people who desperately need external validation. Omega makes nice watches without games and BS.

[@fj7509]

Tudor has METAS now. In house movements,, great bracelets and clasps, expanding their model range, and are even testing precious metal out: all coming in at a great value for dollar spent. Meanwhile Omega keeps increasing prices every year. An Omega now costs two times Tudor when Tudor gives you a very similar product now. Omega needs to do something or else.

[@MasterChronometer]

@@fj7509 Tudor movements are less impressive than the ETAs they replaced and ugly, Tudor case finishing and design is as also basic as it gets. Omega movements actually look nice and have things like the coaxial escapement which is unique to them. The 8900 has twin main spring barrels. If you haven’t already try on some Tudors and Omegas and you’ll see the difference.

[@MasterChronometer]

@@sinesaii I am starting to hate Tudor also, probably the most overrated brand at the moment. Not to mention their price rising that no one complains about. The basic black bay 36 has gone up by over 1k.

[@Visia-w3h]

Omega much better. Brand level is much higher. Tudor also very good. But honestly omega is better

[@AZadeh-nd8vx]

No it's not

[@Visia-w3h]

@ omega brand level is soft of close to Rolex. Tudor brand level is soft of higher than longines . Tudor always Rolex little brother with big shallow. I will rather have lowest level omega model instead of top of the line Tudor. This is my opinion @az

[@ozmondos]

@@Visia-w3h How is Tudor a level above Longines? Longines beats them any day of the week. They have better sales figures, better finishing, better QC and enormous provenance even surpassing Rolex.

[@fj7509]

@@Visia-w3h Omega is nowhere near Rolex. Rolex is shipping Tudor to METAS just to show if their smaller brand can get it, Rolex can get it as well. Tudor has In house movements,, great bracelets and clasps, expanding their model range, and are even testing precious metal out: all coming in at a great value for dollar spent. Meanwhile Omega keeps increasing prices every year. An Omega now costs two times Tudor when Tudor gives you a very similar product now. Omega needs to do something or else.

[@brownmcpherson5724]

I own several Omega and Rolex watches. In my opinion the real comparison is Omega v Rolex. Omega makes fine watches on the same level as Rolex. In terms of case finishing, I prefer Omega. I think this comparison is apples and oranges. Omega being the superior brand.

[@lonewolfemcquade8133]

The fact that Omega uses parts from China for what they charge is ridiculous and it's a fact that the Swatch group has been outsourcing from China for years

[@David-ft7xz]

@@lonewolfemcquade8133 Lots of high-end companies buy parts from China. What's your point?

[@bngr_bngr]

When your watch depreciates like a car that’s not a good thing.

[@fj7509]

@@David-ft7xz But Rolex doesn't. Rolex is one of the very few watch companies that is 100% in house. Down to the metal in the cases. It's all theres.

[@David-ft7xz]

@@fj7509 Is it a Rolex comparison video?

[@craigwoolbert2443]

I absolutely LOVE both! But the edge goes to Omega.

[@craigwoolbert2443]

Why- because like you mentioned, omega has a lot more models that i must have😊

[@bngr_bngr]

Omegas is way more expensive than Tudor.

[@superdad4324]

I do have a lot of love for both brands. I own 2 Tudors, a 58 blue and a 54. I chose tudor as to me they are amazing tool watches, that are made incredibly well with plenty of heritage. I would consider 2 omegas, a moonwatch professional and a pierce brosnan era blue seamaster. I feel they have gone down the path as rolex, made everything super shiny, flashy luxury. They are no longer the amazing tool watches they used to be. The same reason why I would only consider vintage pre ceramic rolex.

[@ErikL727]

When the internet started saying "Tudor is coming after Omega" that's when they dropped the Chrono Chime. It was as if Omega straight-up laughed at everyone, then slammed pies in their faces.

[@thetrentmeister]

I own a BB58 and absolutely love it. A great watch is a great watch.

[@BruceWilliams]

Well said

[@Joe-xo3xy]

TBH it is great to see that one media personality has cleared the air regarding Omega being at a higher tier than Tudor, do not get me wrong, I am a massive Tudor fan. I started to think that may be Tudor was paying so many of the other media outlets to boycott Omega, I still think that may be true. Please let us try and be honest at all times because this space is becoming very deceitful.

[@MikePeterson-sv9ud]

I also own both Tudor and Omega, they're not in the same league. They're a closer comparison to Longines than Omega. Longines are really kicking goals at the moment.

[@swissmade1497]

TBH, I owned a BB58 navy, it was a photogenic watch, but it bored me to death, so I sold it. I bought an Omega Seamaster Professional blue dial/bezel. I think Tudor is way overhyped

[@jimlittle5769]

Omega 100% of the time

[@austriantruther4648]

I love Omega!!

[@DrBob0910]

Great presentation! Response to your questions on Tudor: 1. Yes. Well built watches. Noticed their prices have gone up. My local AD used to give a small discount on Tudor's but not anymore. 2. Similar to early Rolex quality at a reasonable price. I can purchase two Tudor Black Bay's for the price of one Omega Seamaster 300M. I am a fan of both products but given a choice, I will buy the Omega watch. Merry Christmas & Happy New Year.

[@jimlittle5769]

'I can purchase two Tudor Black Bay's for the price of one Omega Seamaster 300M.' Tudor Black Bay is around $4400 new, Seamster 300M is $5900...

[@codys5727]

I have a bb58 blue and looking to get a green smp 300 for my 40th in about a year and a half. I don't feel like there is any friction amongst tudor and omega owners as there may be with rolex owners and either of these. The two models i listed above give you great value and reliability while offering a nice level of luxury akin to the Lexus level of watches. You want something nice but don't care as much about the flex

[@randyreynolds1045]

Tudor rocks❤.

[@M3_86]

Omega. That ck859 is muah

[@SF30Actual]

That bronze gold Omega is fire.

[@TheKopolanpoika]

I have Tudor monochrome jubilee and Green dial Seamaster. Personally I like Tudor more, watch feel smaller even that both are 42mm, also as classic as Omega bracelet is, IMO it's dated and need taper version like Speedy have in these days. Tudor jubilee is so much more comfortable, especially for lefty, and personally I feel like bracelet looks more expensive with taper 20mm to 16-17mm. The quality is even, has to be really enthusiastic to see some quality difference

[@stephengarratt8027]

Both are fantastic brands and have great offerings. Previously I've owned four Tudors, but, my preference would be Omega. In the past I've put a ceiling of five thousand pounds that has ruled out what I've craved. Now I'm shrinking my collection and will buy accordingly when I can afford.

[@jeremydahm2124]

Tudor is so great at offering a quality product with its own identity, history, and design language. Many retain a toolish esthetic and charm that Omega and Rolex no longer have (my opinion). But, Omega, wow, walk into a boutique and you are overwhelmed with fantastic, beautiful choices. I say, If you let go of the "I got one" Rolex mentality, you're going to be very happy with your Omega. I do like Rolex of course but a lot of us are narrowly focused on the brand as the only one worth the money or having...which is silly in my opinion.

[@MJizzle4shizzle]

Tudor and Omega are going to stay right where they are on the totem pole until they release new IPs and stop centering their collection around one (or two) particular models. Omega has the capability to be innovative (Chrono Chime probably being a latest example), however when they do so, they’re still going to play it safe by always pertaining new works to the Speedmaster. But come on! At the least these guys can design something like a micro rotor to give us something new to look at through a case back while slimming down their cases! Anyways, I suggest your next “versus” video should be what we all really wanna see… MVMT VS INVICTA! P.S. My Omega is worn every Tuesday as opposed to my Pink BB Chrono and I am in love with that piece. However at the end of the day, the Speedmaster is the Speedmaster and it is just a better watch.

[@petewilson2314]

I love many models from both but I put my money down for a Speedmaster moonphase, love that one

[@WildManActual]

Omega needs to slim down the 300m. Tudor needs to slim down the Black Bay 41.

[@canadianwatchmonkey3992]

I wouldn’t call Tudor a one trick pony but Deffinetly a 3 trick. I would agree that Omega having to many choices. Merry Christmas Bruce 😊

[@brendonmorici1922]

Omega by far as a case by case basis Omega and Rolex are on par of omega isn’t a tad better in the movement and finish department Tudor should be compared to longines which are both amazing watches

[@Talon173]

Inagree Omega prices have been rising, but look at the competitors. Navitimer is the same RRP as the Speedy, aqua Terra is cheaper the the Date Just for example

[@slanealb]

Lot’s of “Omega is better comments” . My response is ..”They should be”. An entry level Tudor Black Bay is around $4 grand on bracelet. An entry level 300m is around $6g’s. That’s a whopping 50% more expensive. Half again as much. I think Tudor represents the best value for dollar in the industry, a position once FIRMLY held by Omega. I think Omega builds a better finished watch, but they could face some difficulty if SS Rolex availability increases. I love both brands and I think this video is awesome Bruce.

[@BruceWilliams]

Well said!

[@BenNS1971]

Arguments very well presented. Hard not to agree. Love both brands but Omega has won my heart

[@canadianwatchmonkey3992]

My favourite Tudor would be the BB58 925 and for Omega it has to be the Speedmaster FOIS , 😊Thats why I own them. 😊

[@uncles2000]

You can compare two of anything. They both make watches, choose the one you like.

[@scott7841]

I think Tudor is absolutely what Rolex used to be several decades ago. For example, I specifically remember the late 1980s and early 90s when you could buy a Rolex Submariner for a tiny fraction of the price they go for now days. And I say that factoring in wages, inflation, etc. As a result, it made Rolex so much more accessible to watch lovers back in those days. All that being said, I agree Tudor is not on the same level as Omega (at least not right now), but they are doing some great things. And I love my Tudor BB Monochrome 41. It may not be comparable to a new Sub, but it's a fantastic watch at a fraction of the price. And it's probably as close to the design language of a Rolex Sub as we're ever going to get.

[@nikc1313]

Pre owned tudor is the undisputided value king in the luxury segment. Black bays and pelis around 2k mark is just unbeatable. However, taking money out of the equation then Omega is in a tier above.

[@nuamtreaba-js5sh]

Tudor is a youtube brand.

[@fabfour289]

Looking frwrd to the thinner white bb 41 gmt, just like its sibling bb 58 gmt 12.8 mm thin. Thanks for the vid, man.

[@rossdonison4999]

While I admire Tudor and what they are able to do for the price, they seem to be stuck in a bit of a rut. I own a Pelagos and I feel like that’s a good Tudor representation of the brand. On the other hand I own or have owned over two dozen Omegas. I like their variety, quality and styles… however I completely agree with you and sincerely hope that they somehow take your advice to heart regarding their steady march upwards in price. This could be a brand killer, as much as I love the brand, I don’t think they have the market panache to start demanding $10,000+ for their baseline.

[@chief_energy5404]

Omega shud be compared to Rolex.

[@HighLifeWorkout]

Omega would like to compete with Rolex, but as far as sales go, Omega is really competing with Cartier

[@FightGenius98]

@@HighLifeWorkoutyes but in terms of quality, movement , innovation and craftsmanship omega is in a tier above Tudor and Rolex

[@omarion07]

@@FightGenius98movement? Sure Tudor has the same Master chronometer as Omega. Craftsmanship? Rolex case thinness and bracelets put Omega to shame

[@watchdogpodcast239]

​I've owned several of all three brands and I have to disagree. I find Omega QC to be a little unrefined. Definitely when compared to Rolex but also to Tudor. YMMV

[@jhrodriguez08]

When Omega watches don’t depreciate as much, they would be in a league with Rolex , but in the meantime nope 😅

[@Ryuu92i]

Tudor is stepping up its game with the black bay monochrome mostly, with their METAS certified movement, and no use of gilt that was kind of the signature of the brand Before it was more "vintage inspired" and tool-ish and it still is yet, but they tend to move toward a bit more modern vibe with colorset that people were looking for at Rolex We can also see it with the GMT opaline, although it's still quite bulky I really like what Tudor is becoming and I'm eager to see their future releases, maybe expending the 58 line as it's their best-sellers I personally own a black bay monochrome and it's a joy to wear everyday, we can feel the Rolex quality on their bracelet (especially the 5links), it's top notch and in my opinion, have a better one that all the Omega I have owned/tried. Omega is a proper entity by itself and even tho Tudor is stepping up, I would say only the black bay monochrome (and the burgundy version) can match quality of Omega but it can't justify putting them side to side as 1 (or 2 for this matter) Tudor models compete with the large catalog of Omega

[@AK-of9qx]

I love my pelly lhd. But the bezel markings had darkened in colour, it’s almost 2 yrs old..it’s obv still under factory warranty. Still waiting on the markers to fall out like baby teeth..

[@brafya]

if they had continued planet ocean the way it was in 2007 and made it even more fedined, smoother and elegant it would have been a real contender against the sub, but it just feels so janky and cluttered today. really sad to see my actual favorite watch go this way but i will stick to my 2007 with a steel grip due to this.

[@drzaius844]

As the owner of a couple of Black Bays, Omega certainly offers higher quality products. My daily driver is a BB36, and the only Omega I would replace it with is the AT38, which to me is slightly too dressy for every day. So for now I’m just sticking with my BB36 but am watching for a good deal on a first gen Planet Ocean.

[@theenavybluemonster]

Love and own both brands. But Omega is my favorite brand.

[@fabianteka]

Omega=Rolex Longines=Tudor 💁

[@dissident_mantis7]

Tudor feels more casual and tooly than Omega. I ditched the black bay and bought a Seamaster 300, then I purchased a Pelagos FXD. I think Tudor makes great tool/beater watches but I personally wouldn’t consider them to be luxury.

[@mz8393]

This is like comparing a ford to a Cadillac. The more logical comparison is Lincoln and Cadillac.

[@rodsalvador3608]

Why not both? Black Bays are so cheap now (BB58's in particular), they're like at microbrand prices!! Pick a couple, have fun! This is great for collectors; we can collect heavy hitters from Omega, GS, Breguet and others with the remaining budget.

[@dr.kevinmoore8889]

Very well made and thought out video as usual. I would choose Omega by default as the better of two brands that don't do much for me. They just bore me. With the exception of the Dark Side of the Moon Speedmaster. There isn't a single model in either of the two catalogs I'd choose over my Hublot Classic Fusion King Gold Titanium 45mm watch. And then, only if I kept my other Hublot which is the Hublot Classic Aerofusion Gold Chronograph.

[@horologywatchmaking13]

I own a few pieces from Rolex and Omega, the only reason why i don't buy any Tudor is because the quality is bad, real bad. Especially when it's place under a loupe. Tudor can't be compared to the likes of Rolex and Omega, period. Even Longines is better than Tudor in terms of history and quality.

[@BootsandWatches]

Bruce, big fan here of your content. I’m going to throw a curve ball at you as an owner of many omegas, tudors, and Breitling watches. I personally put Breitling ahead of Tudor in build quality. They have heft, finish, and the new clasps are great. Do yourself a favor and try the new avenger 42 model. The bezel action is probably the best I’ve felt. Sub level. My opinion, but i personally love breitling. Have a good Christmas and do a review on the new black dial 42 mm avenger on bracelet. I’d appreciate it brother!

[@BruceWilliams]

I love Breitling too. Likely more than the average watch fan. I fortunately got to film the new Avenger when it released late last year. I wouldn't put the action at Rolex level, but it was improved

[@MrZanzibar123]

Summer blue ultra deep is so dope! Good points, especially that Omega better be careful with that price creep as Tudor is nipping at its heels. But I think swatch group uses its other brands (like Tissot, Mido, etc.) as the more affordable entry level options, reserving Omega for the high end (for those who love and appreciate heritage and technical excellence, with the additional prestige just reflecting that). Tudor and Rolex are more like Seiko and Grand Seiko or Toyota and Lexus; appreciating the quality of the former can, but need not, drive you toward the higher-end prestige of the latter, and there is probably less of a difference between them on sheer technical specs than most people recognize, but still a big gap in prestige. Whether both keep creeping up in price will depend on the global economy and what happens to the middle class, who are the ones buying most of their bread and butter options. (Poor people think Rolex is a rich person's brand, but for the most part it really isn't.). I own Omega and Rolex but not (yet!) Tudor...

[@gotoisqk]

I like tudor

[@HighLifeWorkout]

I only like the tutors that don’t look like inexpensive Rolexes. Meaning the FXD line and the ceramic black bays come to mind

[@derekbrettell8121]

I agree, I think the FXD line are the best that Tudor offers

[@omegafanboyian]

This is a Very Brave Video Bruce , hope the Pitchforks don't come for you Lol Personally can see a case for both , I own both & wear each with great joy. Tudor does what Rolex won't & supplies immediately upon release of a new watch while listening to the customers. Omega Imo have a terrible supply ethos & have slowed recently with movement upgrades unlike competitors.

[@user-uc5xn6eq5q]

Not really comparable brands. Even though I prefer Tudor, Omega is at Rolex brand positioning. Only wish they'd make a 39mm seamaster. They'd sell like hot cake

[@dmoneydmoney6050]

Omega competes with Tudor and not Rolex. That should say everything

[@Talon173]

@@dmoneydmoney6050it really doesnt. Only thing Rolex has over Omega is value retention and a bracelet. Omega are well above Tudor….not bashing tudor they make great watches butnthey arent in the same league as Omega on many levels

[@user-uc5xn6eq5q]

@dmoneydmoney6050 price, heritage, quality. I'm all aspects they compete and compare with Rolex. I say this as a Tudor fan

[@MMAKnowledgeWinner.Undefeated]

​@dmoneydmoney6050 I am a fan of all 3 brands. However, looking at revenue Rolex is 1, Omega 3 and Tudor 17. Honestly, tudor is not finished to the same degree as the other 2 when you have them in person. Rolex at retail seems great value, but especially a couple of years ago the price on things like OPs were just silly for the watch you got. It's coming closer to reality now though. Omega nicely fits in between Rolex and Tudor on pricing, all be it with too many variants that aren't always needed

[@lonewolfemcquade8133]

​@@Talon173And don't forget Omega watches are riddled with parts from China. It's a well known fact that the Swatch group has been outsourcing from China for years. This is inexcusable for what Omega charges

[@adeilakram]

Tudor all day. Own both Seamaster 300 and a Tudor.. Tudor is huge value for money for fraction of price. Bullet proof movements in both watches but Tudor is a lot cheaper

[@LostEngland13-pi4yr]

Tudor is a Rolex poorer cousin. Not as good movements or feel. Omega should be classed against Rolex as Tudor is more tag level

[@g-mangregg5029]

OMEGA and TUDOR serve two slightly different markets. Tudor makes a more tool type watch. Omega also makes tool watches and some of the most beautiful dress watches out there. IMHO Omega is better finished, dressier and has the better of the two in-house movements. The Omega has as high a level of fit and finish as Rolex. Tudor is more toned down, more brushed as opposed to polished in its finishing. The Tudor movements are also excellent but Omega finishes their movements and certifies them to a higher degree of accuracy. TBH I like them both equally as they serve different purposes. You can’t go wrong with either one if they appeal to your personal taste.

[@greenerick]

The Tudor Pelagos is an excellent watch, but the Omega's anti-magnetic movement is superior, offering greater efficiency, though it possesses a lower power reserve. Nevertheless, it's a wonderful KZbin video. I must say, the Tudor bezel has a particularly satisfying feel when rotated.

[@TomHudsonOfficial]

Hello greenerick fancy seeing you here. Omega for the win.

[@lonewolfemcquade8133]

The anti magnetic argument is a moot point since Rolex and even Tudor aren't getting magnetized so it's a pointless comparison

[@mrnoisy4883]

Tudor putting an exhibition case back on the 925 is beyond belief 🤦

[@perrdland7903]

As an owner of several timepieces from both a Rolex and Omega, I find this comparison troubling. Tudor can be compared to Longines, all day and every day. Never to Omega. It’s freaking crazy to start with this. Based on history, Omega crushes Rolex. To compare the brand to Tudor is moronic. Honestly, I get pissed off seeing these brands being compared so often by KZbinrs.

[@eibi2001]

That bronze gold ck 👌

[@takethecurseOFFwashingmachine]

Rolex makes great looking, great functioning, purpose built watches. The problem I see is that they really are not high horology, and they seem to be resting more on their reputation as aspirational pieces for the middle class rather than exceptional watch making, while moving up market. I’m not sure how far that works

[@mikeyyoung63]

Tudor recently has done REALLY well and made a lot of progress but lets be real they are not Omega......

[@ozmondos]

I keep getting this Omega vs Tudor argument from the youtubers, but in reality they aren't in the same league. I went on to purchase a Black Bay 54, but I was really underwhelmed after holding it. In fact the PRX is much better finished than the Tudor Royal.

[@BruceWilliams]

Having owned both, I can speak from experienced. The Royal is in another league above the PRX!

[@zillsburyy1]

both are great. i like TUDOR more than bland boring rolex. But i do like OMEGA better than TUDOR

[@Talon173]

Omega still wins. Just picked up an Aqua Terra small seconds in the sales and its incredible. Dials, finishing, cases, movement are still better than Tudor. Thats not bashing on Tudor, they make great watches but Omega are still a step ahead. They do need to thin down some watches and shrink the 300m to 40mm though. Tudor make some great tool watches with the Pelagos, FXD and BB58 but i do feel like they need a bit of fun back in the brand like they had with the P01, North Flag, Monte Carlo

[@MR2D2AL]

I own no watches from either brand, but I could imagine having a collection of only five or six Tudor watches, and not feeling that anything was missing. BB39, BB Heritage Red Bezel, Royal Chocolate, 1926, BB Bronze… perhaps I’ve not gotten deep enough in the weeds with Omega, but Tudor has always resonated with me.

[@olegvladimir4368]

Omega >>>> rolex

[@AZadeh-nd8vx]

I've owned both brands and there really isn't any difference in quality, despite what people think and say.

[@seanlukecorroon]

Omega is far superior

[@darrenfry4695]

No it's not, it's not far superior, watch for watch one is just slightly better.

[@MagnusLarsson-b3h]

Omega is superior to Tudor and much more highend. Much closer to Rolex. Tudor are making great watches but not many outside the watch community knows about them. The brand recognition is much higher with Omega. The biggest problem with Tudor though is that most of their models are just variants of old Rolex models. The biggest problem with Omega is that their watches are becoming more and overpriced with secondhand prices not too great if you bought your Omega new and are selling it. However thats a problem with most luxury watch brands. Except Rolex.

[@GU5S]

Tudor and Omega are not in the same conversation. Tudor are both boring and ugly as hell. Now granted, that's a subjective opinion. But what's not subjective is the Omega are way ahead on movement, finishing, history and brand. Omega certainly are not perfect, and though I'm a big fan there's certainly much you can be critical of with them. But comparing them to Tudor is just wrong. Absolutely sick of hearing about Tudor from EVERY watch youtuber going. Sorry, they are not that great in my opinion. A brand like Longines gives you far better history and more interesting watches for better value.

[@deanjackson8322]

I owned and enjoyed the Tudor blackbay 58 until i acquired the Omega 300m. The Tudor is a good watch but the Omega diver just blows the blackbay away.......oh except for the bezel action but who really cares too much about that?

[@DiegoIrving2]

In my opinion they are pretty similar in terms of quality with Omega being a step above. That being said, Tudors are usually more wereable and age better. Modern Omegas look dated in just a few years. Especially the seamaster with the weird hands, the horrible looking bracelet, the waves on the dial and the valve esape. Too many things going on that make the watch not look clean at all and make you get tired of it. Less is more

[@ilmaril8432]

Most Omega models are "heavy hitters", whereas most Tudors are not.

[@impoautosguatemala9847]

Tudor is not near omega in any way haha omega is so above tudor 😅

[@wristopia4101]

No real comparrison, get both. Black date wheel on a grey dial looks bad on that Omega IMO.

[@Visia-w3h]

Of course omega. Why waste time to compare?

[@voltairecarlos2398]

Omega for sure. Tudir? I'll rather the Rolex thanks

[@siddhant46s54]

What Tudor need to do is get rid of those awful , fragile , scratchable and fading aluminium bezel and replace it with a fine brushed or matte ceramic bezel ( like in the pelagos and the new pelagos FXD GMT ) . the pelages FXD GMT has the best Tudor bezel to date with the fully limes matte ceramic bezel . The matte ceramic is the best of both worlds , the matte finish appealing and fitting into the vintage inspired vibe of Tudor plus giving us the durability , scratch resistance and non fading advantages of ceramic !

[@NeoWahNah]

😂

[@adamlichman1181]

Tudor movements aren't salida anymore.

[@JohnnyBeans-w9k]

Tudor is now starting to put a Tfit on their bracelet. Omega is not listening to its customers. Omega lume is subpar and top heavy. Tudor is starting to make thinner watches. I have the Aqua Terra $6200 and went for four Tudors. Pelagos, Pro, opaline gmt and BB41 each alI for less than $5000. I enjoy them all but my Rolex submariner Starbucks is on another level.

[@PhaedruS007]

Omega is overpriced and over hyped. They should be priced competitively with Tudor, which has more class as well. All the movie and marketing BS lowers Omega's desirability to me.

[@leeharding8306]

Omega is in between Tudor and Rolex although they are definitely underperforming with the history and brand recognition they have. Terrible bezel action on all the divers and thick cases along with poor bracelets and clasps let the brand down. They certainly need to replace many models rather than constantly tweaking old ones while cutting the catalogue in half. Tudor are improving year on year but they are essentially retro Rolex homages. Both brands have ramped up prices much too much.

[@coffeeboyclips1973]

Omega is more prestigious brand, tudor is same level as longines and oris Cant take tudor seriously with the snowflake hands

[@jimlittle5769]

Exactly...and I'll take Longines almost every time over Tudor.

[@coffeeboyclips1973]

@@jimlittle5769 same, I've owned watches from both brands, will pick longines every time

[@ViolinistWilliam]

Awesome video, Bruce. I don’t dispute folks saying Omega quality is better, it def is. But the fact remains that a ton of people don’t see it that way because so many of Tudor’s designs are superior and Omega’s look like toys.