Budget 4090 Killer? The NVIDIA RTX 5070 GPU

3dGameMan T-Shirts: 3dgameman.mysp...
Join our community: / 3dgameman
Tip Jar: paypal.me/3dGa...
Channel Perks: / @3dgameman
Thanks for liking, sharing, subscribing & hitting that notification bell :)
Have a Question?: • Ask Me a Question
Other relevant links:
Twitter: / 3dgameman
Steam: steamcommunity...
TikTok: / 3dgameman
My Podcast: • Podcasts (Gaming, Tech...
Source: www.pcgamesn.c...
The RTX 4090 boasts significantly more raw GPU power than the RTX 5070, despite the 5070's impressive performance gains through DLSS 4. Here's why:
Core Count: The 4090 has a substantially larger number of CUDA cores, the processing units responsible for rendering graphics. This translates to significantly more raw processing power.
Memory: The 4090 features 24GB of GDDR6X memory, double the 12GB GDDR7 found in the 5070.1 This larger memory pool allows the 4090 to handle more complex scenes, higher resolutions, and demanding textures without running into memory bottlenecks.
Memory Bandwidth: The 4090 has significantly higher memory bandwidth, allowing it to transfer data between the GPU and system memory much faster. This is crucial for maintaining high frame rates in demanding games.
Ray Tracing Cores: The 4090 has more dedicated ray tracing cores, leading to faster and more efficient ray tracing performance, which is increasingly important in modern games.
In essence:
While DLSS 4 and multi-frame generation are impressive technologies that allow the RTX 5070 to achieve remarkable performance in certain scenarios, the RTX 4090's superior raw GPU power, larger memory capacity, and higher memory bandwidth give it a significant performance advantage, especially in games that don't fully utilize DLSS 4 or have demanding graphical requirements.
Disclaimer: This information is based on current knowledge and may be subject to change.

[@dennis0007]

I didn’t realize you were still making videos until this popped up on my KZbin feed. Loved your case reviews back in the day. Keep it up!

[@um8778]

Unfortunately, the motherboard tray is not removable.

[@nyranstanton203]

you can always cut the hz rate of your monitor to 60/144hz. I kind of expect 144fps these days because my monitor refresh rate is 240hz, but i can cut it to 144 hz. For the unbelievable prices of the 5090...i kind of WOULD want raw 144fps performance without DLSS, otherwise might aswell just be happy with 60fps with a 5070.

[@Pwnag3Inc]

I will be sticking with my 4090. I never use dlss or frame gen because the tech sucks. It’s cool they can nvidia do it, but there are also people out here that swallow swords. Also nvidia chose far cry 6 as a rasterization comparison with the 4090 and the 5090 looks to be about 25-30 % faster. I will not pay $2000 for a 30% uplift.

[@Razear]

Yeah, it's disingenuous for Jensen and NVIDIA to market the 5070 as a faster card without mentioning the caveat that they were leveraging DLSS 4. But that's the PR spin that companies shamelessly love. It's one of those "read the fine print" moments.

[@lewisbutler3396]

Every slide that said it was faster said only with the full suite of ai turned on

[@Magnulus76]

They do mention it. They are counting on the 5070 being bought for its actual real world game performance. Most RTX owners use DLSS to play games.

[@Magnulus76]

The more CUDA cores is only going to matter in situations where DLSS and framegen are not used. Neural rendering is the future of computer graphics, so basically this is like complaining that the Kyro II wasn't really faster than the Geforce 2, because it's 16-bit color performance wasn't better than Geforce 2.

[@sharkeys]

Make's you wonder considering the fact that Nvidia is currently unmatched at the upper echelon of the GPU ladder they feel the need to inflate or misrepresent their "performance", they didn't mention real raw performance at all which is deeply worrying going forward.

[@md-vl3lm]

Waisted money buy 4090😅😂

[@deadpoolf1]

And you get lantcey and input lag