Рет қаралды 11,204
This is an interesting piece of history in the modern sword market.
You can find it on ebay here - www.ebay.com/i...
You can see it listed on SBG here - sbg-sword-foru...
Some years ago Bugei Trading Co. offered a service to make a custom sword. Howard Clark was one of the smiths that made those custom swords. The swords took time to finish and I don’t know how long the service was offered but it was not an option that was offered the entirety of Bugei’s time in business.
This sword is a 1086 blade. Mr. Clark made 1086 and L6 blades. While his work in L6 is more famous, the blades he makes in 1086 are nothing to scoff at. L6 blades are supposed to be more resilient to shock but dull more quickly. 1086 blades are the reverse. The edge retention is quite good but they will not absorb the same amount of sock. The blades are still very durable and I would argue that show a little more artistry. The hamon often has a little more character than the L6 blades. 1086 is also a unique steel to use. Many American smiths use 1075 or 1095. 1086 being somewhere in the middle it should offer some better edge retention than 1075 while being less brittle than 1095. I am not a metallurgist so take what I say with a grain of salt. What I can say as a user, 1086 has been great.
Apart from the blade being made by Howard Clark, the mount is a mystery. I do not know who did the work but I suspect it was Ted Tenold. The fittings are also a mystery, they are a bamboo and tighter theme. They appear to be cast pieces of a decent quality. The menuki look antique but I cannot say for sure. They are a higher detail and better quality than the other fittings.
I reached out to Howard Clark about the sword and asked if he remembered making it. As it is a longer blade, I thought it might stand out among the rest. Mr. Clard did not recall but was 80% sure it was his work. The nakago is not signed and that is odd though not impossible. In my personal opinion, Howard Clark looks to be the smith. Too many characteristics point to him and the likelihood of it being an early work explains some of the other oddities.
I also reached out to Ted Tenold and he did not recall the blade either. Though being many years back and only looking at the photo, it was not enough to say one way or the other.
The condition of the sword would be best described as unused but aged. There are some minor signs of handling on the ito. The koiguchi has a crack in it but it does not look to have been used. I would imagine the crack is from age/expansion ect.. The saya has some minor blemishes and dings. The blade has some scuffs that look like saya rub but no signs of use on cutting. Minor scuffs on the polish don’t come out in photos easily but they are present. Additionally there is some tsuba wiggle. I would guess it could be tightened up though. I personally think the condition is quite good overall.
Handle/Tsuka Length: 15.375”
Blade/Nagasa Length: 31.5” (without habaki)
Sori: .11”
Moto-haba: 1.24”
Saki-haba: .885”
Motokasane: .285”
Sakikasane: .23”
Weight: 3lb 1.4oz
POB: 6.75” from tsuba
MSRP: Around $4500 from Bugei (back in the day)
In terms of handling this sword moves pretty well for its size and stature. It is a big sword with a long handle but the weight is pretty low for its size. It feels controllable in the cut or thrust. The sori is closer to koshi sori but it is so small that the blade is very close to straight. It draws well and noto is not a problem if you are comfortable with a blade this size.
Mass 1400.466442375
Hilt Extremity 0
Grip Reference 39.0525
Blade Extremity 121.92
Center of Gravity 56.515
Lever Reference 1.27
Hilt Node 31.115
Blade Node 93.35
Action Point 34.8
Pivot Point 100.33
Action Point 17.8
Pivot point 76.5
subcaelo.net/e...
Music provided by - Kevin MacLeod incompetech.com
Link to the new facebook spot - / matthewjensenswordreview
Link to the new patreon spot - / krunan
Link to my ebay sales page - www.ebay.com/us...