Such a great discussion..Dr Last's comparisons between Galileo vs Hegel and Darwin vs Freud was so illuminating and brings together so many broad ideas. What he is doing with Philisophy Portal is amazing, and his recent substack article reflecting on the Dawkins/Peterson debate was also thought-provoking (and demonstrates the need for a Lacanian framing to mediate these sort of big ideas debates). Sam, I hope you interview Isabel Milar in the future?? Thanks for all your interviews, I always learn so much!
@RahulSam16 күн бұрын
Thank you for the kind words! Cadell sure is great. And yes! I have reached out to Isabel Milar and am hoping to discuss her book 'The Psychoanalysis of Artificial Intelligence' once she's back to work from maternal leave.
@far-light2112fuzzion11 күн бұрын
Being a studant of hegel, marx and Proudhon , i congrat your podcast, may u someday looking for sobody that have got some research about vero-similar dialetiks abotout Heráclito , Hegel and the Anarquist Proudhon Jean Pierre?! Thanks... The anti-nomics pairs of Proudhon are similar and do-not have a fixed sinthésis...
@RahulSam11 күн бұрын
Thank you, my friend. I will keep an eye out for such guests for sure.
@akbar-nr4kc17 күн бұрын
hi sam i want to know what would be hegel and zizek take on chomsky and colin mcginn idea of mysterianism? did he reject or accept it? mysterianism means certain metaphyiscal questions like concioussness and many other questions are beyond our cognitive limits ..sometimes it is also called cognitive closure...chomsky also derived idea from thomas nagel idea of 'what it is like to bat'''that same like this question ''what it is like to me '' is unanswerable and ultimate mystery..i want to know what would hegel and zizek regard this idea of mysterianism(ultimate pessimissm)..
@diedoktor17 күн бұрын
Hegel, Zizek, and Chomsky would all claim that there's an invisible barrier between human beings in the world that prevents knowledge from forming. Read Engels' Anti Duhring for a refutation.