Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Campaign Review

Player freedom drags down Modern Warfare 3's biggest moments.
#gaming #gamespot #callofduty #callofdutymodernwarfare3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3's campaign picks up where last year's Modern Warfare 2 left off. Captain Price's iconic Task Force 141 is back in action and, as teased in the final cutscenes of Modern Warfare 2, the new threat is Vladimir Makarov, a major antagonist of the original Modern Warfare franchise. Modern Warfare 3 sparks a hot opening with an early reveal of Makarov, but the introduction of the new Open Combat missions disrupts the story's pace for a fizzled-out ending.

[@eggy_bread8579]

The fact that the 2019 Warzone map is recycled to make up half of the campaign maps is shocking. And the online maps are just MW2 maps from 2009.

[@arousedkhajiit]

I don't know if we can really call any profit-maximizing, cost-minimizing decisions from Activision shocking anymore.

[@Catastrophic_Cat_]

Imagine calling the game MW3 and not a single multiplayer map is from MW3. How do they mess up this bad that they confuse the game they are trying to bring nostalgia to 😂

[@andrewambrusko3651]

​@@Catastrophic_Cat_they'll release them with the battle passes in the future 😂

[@nukey_nuke]

That might be why they removed warzone 1…

[@shawklan27]

​@Caballolechero cuz this was 100% was meant to be dlc but Activision just said no to something sensible and charged it 70 quid

[@captainmercy87]

There was a time where I’d be excited by a new COD campaign.

[@gabrielgoncalves2763]

That last time was 2008 for me.

[@rhyssuy8361]

​@@gabrielgoncalves2763really you didn't like modern warfare 2 or black ops you only liked it until world at war

[@A_mir0_0]

Yeah black ops was the last one I realy enjoyed…

[@caprise-music6722]

Apart from MW2019 which I did enjoy a fair bit, the last campaign I REALLY loved was Black Ops 1. It was a great campaign. That was like the main reason to buy the game, yet it had the good multiplayer too ofc

[@steveo0127]

@@gabrielgoncalves2763that’s the last time I played the campaign as well

[@steveclock6051]

Looks like the review may be longer than the campaign

[@starboyjedi13]

Bro🤣🤣😂

[@aakashkapoor8933]

That hurts

[@smolltaco5667]

​@@aakashkapoor8933nah its funny

[@trumpisgod2535]

Mw3 was originally a map dlc pack for MW2 but they decided to just turn it into a full blown game

[@rj12341]

Did they not realise missions like clean house etc are what players like? how can they ignore this?

[@yogaajie4265]

Probably money

[@kitzys8887]

they saved so much money by just copy and pasting the warzone and DMZ map into the campaign. At this point they are barely putting thought into the campaigns because they know that millions of people will still buy cod for warzone and multiplayer. just how it is

[@johndodo2062]

​@@kitzys8887at least half the fans only played for campaign. Look at the trophies. Activision fed you people the lie that campaign isn't important and you actually believed them

[@kitzys8887]

I never said the campaign isn't important, I was just explaining that they will still thrive due too mp and warzone with a lot of players ignoring the campaign entirely. warzone makes more money for them than a campaign ever will.@@johndodo2062

[@xavierpeterson7139]

To be fair operators didn’t like all their tactics being shown in games. Can be used against them. That was another reason

[@azorahai6636]

This campaign is like final season of Game of Thrones, too short, too rushed and I have mixed feelings.

[@ACE112ACE112]

OOF. the $70 dlc meme is becoming a reality

[@remaks8405]

@@ACE112ACE112it wasn't a meme but an accurate prediction

[@fatshoelace]

It wasn't rushed. It was dlc

[@andrewambrusko3651]

Nah this makes the final season of GoT look like a masterpiece in storytelling 😂

[@kenlee4356]

​@@andrewambrusko3651DAMN. It's that bad?

[@kthiede]

Refunded. I don't blame the developers. They were given no time and a change of vision (DLC to Full Game) mid-way through. Publishers and executives are lacking what makes Cod amazing. Over-the-top action, linear missions, crazy cutscenes, and a clear story. Just take a gap year add the multiplayer maps as DLC for $30 and everyone would be happier than this. When you put revenue over quality it will cost you in the long run. I don't understand how companies forget this. Vote with your wallets.

[@ravantgarde1899]

I really hope people don’t end up buying this game. COD will never change if they keep breaking sales records each year

[@Gatorade69]

People will buy this, unfortunately. Vanguard didn't sell good so let's hope this does worse than Vanguard. However MS now own Activision and Bobby Nodick is leaving so maybe they can turn it around.

[@tchitchouan]

oh it will sell gamebusters

[@superduper6419]

@@Gatorade69This game will be doomed to face the same fate the vanguard faced tbh

[@crawdaddyy]

I held out from buying it this year, so there hope

[@Gatorade69]

@@superduper6419 Let's hope it does even worse than Vanguard.

[@Manunido]

I’d give it a 3/10. My main reason being when I play campaign I don’t want to feel like I’m playing Warzone. It feels like they’re trying to experiment with a way to get rid of both campaign and zombies and fold it all into Warzone.

[@thehobo00]

thank you for ensuring that I don't buy it lol

[@kabidabida409]

Yeah same opinion

[@Manunido]

@@thehobo00 don’t buy it until it’s on sale if at all

[@chan13153]

@@Manunido Don't buy it at all. Just keep playing the COD game you already own

[@frozone-yeah]

All signs were pointing to this being the case, the fact that this was originally MW 2 DLC, and they wanted to stretch it out given the whole “annual release” but since there wasn’t enough time that’s why they did the gulag and the Warzone maps, putting in content that was already established in warzone to pad out the game because of being rushed for ideas, and then put all that mess together with a few sprinkled linear missions. Boom $70 to $100 please. Seen this coming from a mile away. No thanks, I’ll get this on a deep deep sale if that. If zombies is not good forget it.

[@Dean1000...]

Original mw3 was much better. Ending was satisfying.

[@ProjectGamerYT]

They literally just threw this together as quickly and cheaply as possible

[@cursedcrow1033]

Like the last 4 year cods

[@emaadally5658]

And selling this game for 70 dollars 😂. This was clearly a dlc for mw2.

[@ajgarcia9402]

Was expected knowing it was sledgehammer studios who worked on it😂

[@Ray__E]

They know the COD fanboys will buy anything they throw out

[@ox_trueprotagonistchrisred9085]

@@emaadally5658I thought MW2 was getting an expansion and Activision decided “u know what? Let’s just make it another game, we have one year”

[@tnductai]

campaign used to be 1/2 of the game's value, now it's just a bonus that is there to justify the $70 price tag. sad for the gaming industry.

[@AbernathyCrimson]

$70 for DLC is a new low. The one thing I expect COD to get right every year is the campaign. They’ve been consistently good. But it’s more obvious than ever that COD has no competition.

[@neilsimmons9582]

They should have just remastered the original MW3, that would have been way better than what we got

[@smolltaco5667]

Why do you need to be resold the same game for more money? When you know they gonna shut down the og mw3 and make the new one bad Just buy the og instead of begging activision to ruin the only good thing they had

[@i4mboyc]

💯 I definitely agree

[@jollama]

@@smolltaco5667First 2 were remastered, might as well go all the way with the third one 🤷‍♂️

[@smolltaco5667]

@@jollama thats just dumb logic, did u not read my reply

[@steverodgers1486]

I play campaign a few times A few rounds on multiplayer. But I'm going to wait for price drop on this one...think it will drop quicker...like vanguard I picked that one up for just twenty quid. Anyone buying it though I hope you all enjoy remember it's the person playing it who decides if it's worth it Peace

[@yurtthesilentgod1225]

STOP GIVING THEM MONEY OR IT WILL NEVER GET BETTER. Buy and play a game that is not anti consumer. If you know its bad then show them you aren't a sheep. God you people are the problem.

[@flexivefowl8186]

Will this franchise ever end? By the way it was a 5/10

[@ChandranPrema123]

If that was the case would you think Microsoft would buy CoD for 70 Bn$😂

[@DarkTravesty03]

No, it makes to much money

[@theduck2970]

5 is still too high.

[@breadordecide]

It is always the best selling game of the year so no.

[@hbwdino]

Almost nobody cares about campaign in cod, and first time after black ops 4 we are getting dicent multiplayer. Probably it will never end since every year it is most selling game..

[@Mr-th9vh]

Not a patch on the original modern warfares,back in the days when you were excited for a new cod campaign, queuing at midnight to pick up your copy,money over passion nowadays.

[@morganator4874]

Exactly mate

[@leospeedleo]

Finally Call of Duty gets the score it actually deserves 😂

[@starboyjedi13]

Indeed

[@jacobtom9736]

Now give it to the multiplayer

[@kingcorey8438]

Xbox tax

[@a.i.m4242]

Crazy how Infinity Ward brought COD back to life with MW19 after years of disappointments. Then they release this.

[@Lead_Foot]

Sledgehammer made the campaign

[@seanzhang3873]

Sledgehammer is always that worst kid in the family. Vanguard was a disaster as well. I don't even know why Blizzard still keep the studio alive...

[@Razgriz-Specter]

​@@Lead_FootIW had oversight and were in charge of the narrative

[@gerardomotavejar8000]

@@seanzhang3873 Cheap studio perhaps

[@datavrg]

​@@Lead_FootSledgehammer made the multiplayer, infinity ward made the campaign, treyarch is making zombies, and raven is making warzone.

[@nialloconnor1490]

I remember being extremely disappointed by the original mw 3 campaign but next to this it looks like a classic.

[@KevBoy3D]

This is true

[@gokhankalyoncu1746]

Fact

[@alexhunter2361]

That’s because it was.

[@longan12]

The original MW3 campaign was top tier lol what are you on about

[@ChandranPrema123]

Original MW3 had a 10/10 Ending it was the last game of the series. But yeah that game too had a bad dev period

[@John117M63]

They knew exactly what they were doing. This is 't because it was rushed, its because they are trying to see how much they can get away with

[@camdenritter7652]

They can get away with a LOT more than this. People are still buying and defending it. I can guarantee that they can sell MW4 for $100 and with 5 old MW3 maps and no campaign and it will sell like hotcakes. Might even win a few rewards.

[@filb911]

MW3: The download is longer than the campaign.

[@vegasviking86]

Cool. So the only reason to get excited about MW3 is nothing but a lazy cop-out. Thanks for saving me from this $70 dlc

[@retroworldnews]

just finished the campaign today on my PS4. I feel people are more interested how the zombie game flow like in MW3.

[@Doffy11232]

Compare this campaign to MW2 Campaign, what are your thoughts?

[@CL88Rembert]

@@Doffy11232 disappointment it’s essentially Spec Ops/Warzone disguised as a campaign

[@VS_Gamer84]

@@Doffy11232 Looks like after watching this video I feel MW II campaign is 100% better than MW III.. I liked MW II campaign but 2019 MW had very good campaign

[@ItsDatCajunStuff]

Clearly rushed out the door so Activision could quickly profit off it before getting bought. Copy and paste from previous games, sell it for $70. Bad idea.

[@alfonsosolivan124]

Alejandro not being in this game is a crime

[@Nayson]

This video review is longer than the campaign.

[@Guirko]

So the campaign is recycled warzone with cutscenes, zombies is recycled warzone with zombies, and the multiplayer is recycled MW2009... And to think, unoriginality was already a major complaint from fans 10 years ago.

[@beingmda]

They should've just taken the extra year off as they said they would.

[@jackanory-balamory]

Nowadays I wish the campaign was sold separately because I don't have the time or inclination to play the multiplayer but there are missions from old games that I like to go back and play. Clean house comes to mind

[@Code_Dee]

It is so messed up, I only bought MW19 for the campaign but they literally force you to download warzone which is like 100 gb.

[@soumyadipray1374]

Although Activision tried really hard to make it like og mw2 (2009) but the map feels like i am playing warzone with npcs

[@Yetha148]

The fact they killed the main character of the previous game just like a side character

[@two-keytech7578]

They tried to make dlc into a full game in less than a year.

[@amritbasavaraj9146]

3:13 Why does this map look so similar to Battlefield 2042's Manifest map?

[@ChandranPrema123]

It's because of the weather and similar lighting that's why

[@THEdemetrishigashikata]

I thought the same thing it looks almost identical

[@Lionelitun]

IGN not uploading their COD MW3 campaign review on their KZbin sounds off. Anyway a franchise that releases a new game every year is quite not enough time for the developers to really make a good game. And now the focus in the modern gaming era shifted from good story telling to online gaming so how would you expect a long good campaign in this era, these are the downs of digitalizing gaming.

[@josht5453]

The developers rotate and make a new game every 3-4 years.

[@EX-Flashkick]

The uploaded it

[@Lionelitun]

@@EX-Flashkick yes a hour ago

[@SahilG23]

Thry rightly marked it as a dlc to mw2 on playstation

[@Hu3vosGr4ndes]

I refunded it last night on Steam, and I think the refund page may have listed it as DLC too. Rightly so

[@Gatorade69]

Yeah I would have probably bought it if it was 20-30$. You have to launch MW3 from inside MW2. This is definitely DLC. People complain about EA but Activision is literally the worst.

[@connorthomas3919]

the sad thing about this was that it was so obviously DLC for Modern Warfare 2 . obviously pushed out the door to make a new Call of Duty .they have to have a new game every year somehow .how about taking a year off .,and just released this is story DLC

[@emaadally5658]

This was clearly a dlc for mw2. Shame on activision for making the campaign a 3-4hr long. This game is not worth it for 70 dollars.

[@corruptedchaosmobile4574]

You know its bad when game reviewers hate it.

[@mezzops1716]

it feels like they want to make an open world campaign on a warzone map but dont quite have the technology to make it yet

[@Latinosmassacre-]

Nah they were just lazy don't want do anything bcuz their fanboy would still giveaway them 70 dollar..😅

[@Gatorade69]

This is just DLC being sold full price.

[@Code_Dee]

The technology is not the problem, what you're describing is basically MGSV or Far Cry 3. Games that came out ten years ago.

[@vindex7309]

“No Russian” was disgusting and highly controversial. That said, it was perfect and so well done that here we are talking about it today. Talk about a way to ignite the events of MW2. It was in a class of its own and, while it was a horrible sequence, actually spoke to the horrors of war.

[@davidTMF82rr]

GOTY

[@gangstergamer7414]

Call of duty: No easy day is currently in production and will be release 2024!!

[@WamaziTech]

No one is buying that I've lost all hope for MW after this stunt.

[@spacegerrit9499]

Not planning on buying it. No way I'm gonna pay this much for a rebranded DLC.

[@pad9x]

i think they should have included both play styles for the campaign mode. maybe during the first run it would be the traditional on rails approach, and then through the second play through you can have the choice of open play style.

[@sk8glassesnmay493]

Right !! And a weapons select screen before each mission. That makes it have so much replay ability . Why can’t they just do that? It took forever for them to even give us a fire mode select in the campaign. They don’t care.

[@TheLazyLabrador]

$70 DLC

[@goodguyseb3067]

Its always been

[@vindex7309]

MWIII seems like it’s trying to set up who Makarov is… but it falls short. I love the concept, but for a guy who is meticulous about his plans, they seem to be consistently thwarted with minimal stakes..?

[@seanzhang3873]

Well, you just know it is gonna be a bad apple whenever Sledgehammer involves it.

[@mariomario1462]

The no russian mission was amazing. Stop with the cringey crying over a game where your goal is shooting people.

[@ryanreyes5440]

90% of COD shelf life is on multiplayer. So having some elements from multiplayer made some sense. MW2 pace felt slow vs MW3 unlimited sprinting. It's not as pretty cause of the open world aspect and im sure they are just prepping us to play more war zone vs traditional multiplayer.

[@DuckiesUnite]

This review is almost as long as the campaign.

[@phlatz]

The first mission was legit the only good one

[@SkyForgeVideos]

Even it was too quick and too little. There's barely enough gameplay to justify calling it "mission". Compared to what we were doing in Raids or DMZ last year it's a complete joke. For example: The infiltration sequence could have been 3x longer with laser traps and tripwire defusing segments. They could have made it more difficult to unlock Makarov's cell. Then they could have had a whole boat chase sequence where you're being chased by the chopper gunner while having to shoot it down from the patrol boat turret... Instead it's juat a couple short shooting sequences that break up... The cutscenes. Total disappointment.

[@phlatz]

@@SkyForgeVideos fair, it was still mid of course I’m just saying it was at least better than the rest of it

[@AIFRANCHISE1]

I don’t get the point of even releasing it with a campaign if this is the kinda effort they put forth. Campaign Seems like beyond an after thought to them.

[@Gatorade69]

Because this was just DLC for MW2 year two.

[@mateofernandez4398]

That's why I keep playing the original version of COD modern warfare. This games are more like fanfiction.

[@joshuaradick5679]

I kind of liked the open missions. But that ending…It felt rushed, like only 2/3 of a story.

[@Channel-io4xu]

If this came out 15 years ago it would be a $10 dlc

[@ox_trueprotagonistchrisred9085]

COD is turning into live service every year SmH I’m glad I refunded

[@mephisto5856]

Battle Royale really destroyed COD.

[@rewpertcone8243]

Executives ruined cod

[@richhughes2526]

Yup this will be a £12 bargain bucket buy, soon as I saw open missions I lost all interest. Maybe £10 actually.

[@richhughes2526]

And another cliff hanger Ergh no.

[@o0junglist0o93]

The concept of open combat missions is great, the implementation however, is weak. If more care was taken with different objectives and areas available with higher difficulties, it could've been amazing...

[@mercenarydelta7351]

Yep. Much of the time, it's just going from Point A to Point B. And there should've been at least one mission where you start guns blazing with some AI teammates.

[@anthonybuda4767]

I'm totally new to COD, started playing zombies back in 2015 for a couple years so MWF3 is the first campaign I've done and I thought it was a blast!

[@jv-man3698]

Play 2019. It’s ten times better. And it’s cheap

[@jonathanmather6897]

Would have been a solid expansion at $20; as the lynchpin (for me, all CoD campaigns are) for a $70 title, it’s very disappointing.

[@sukhasnipes5812]

i hope they will show these ratings in ad like they always do

[@AliFOJ5]

I liked the campaign. Took me 6 hours to complete which is about the right amount of time any COD story mode has. Some of the starting missions were really good as well even if they were open combat styled. My big issue with the story is the ending. It felt so rushed and didn’t conclude anything which is kinda disappointing. They could have put an other missions in to conclude things slowly and not in this hectic way. I’d give it a 6/10. It’s not as good as MW2 but it is not as bad as people are making it out to be. Also I’m more excited for the multiplayer

[@interlinkedMedia]

Are you trying to tell me they rush these games out?!?!

[@jollyroger9998]

This is what happens when one of your studios drops the ball so you have to rush a game in a year that normally takes 3

[@Gatorade69]

Not quite. MW2 was supposed to be supported for two years. This is literally just DLC being sold as a full game.

[@V3ntilator]

Sony regret putting money in to this and tried to get a refund from Microsoft. Since MS were forced to honor the deal, Sony were also stuck with it. This is the last COD Sony had a deal with Activision on as the deal expires before next COD.

[@BetweenTheLyons]

Too bad they cut another 10 year deal a few months ago.

[@TheDeadlyiron]

Open combat feels like it was designed 4 speed running... it made me just want to get objectives done as fast as possible rather than feel and enjoy the story

[@Seanmyers2000]

Let’s hope the multiplayer mode will be good

[@Gatorade69]

It's going to be MW2 with some changes.

[@oasisgaming1026]

I was very impressed with the MW2 missions. Thought it had a bit of something for peoples different play styles and some good missions and character building. MW3 is such a disappointment. The linear missions where decent but the god awful open missions where a real drag. Ruined it for me, agree with the 5/10

[@blackdragon6]

There's no big stakes anymore, it don't feel like a globetrotting blockbuster action thriller anymore. Now it's just small and generic. IMO

[@Gatorade69]

If you want a big steak go to your local butcher. It's because this was a MW2 DLC being sold full price.

[@blackdragon6]

@@Gatorade69 i mean stakes 😭

[@Gatorade69]

@@blackdragon6 😁

[@iamskyfall]

It’s painfully obvious the “openness” of these levels are the result of the multiplayer maps being repurposed for single player missions.

[@MarcusHedenberg]

It might be worth putting a de-esser on the voice. The 's's sounded quite sharp in this review to my ears.

[@henrykrinkle5647]

They make games 70$ then put even less effort into making them. Gaming is dead.

[@Glubttub]

“Forces you to take part in act of terrorism.” Is a crazy way to put it. The game isn’t for super sensitive people. And you can complete do that mission with out killing a civilian. Forgot to mention that too..

[@deputyfeelgood]

😂why do I have to play a call of duty game and shoot fictional video game characters. Some of these reviewers are just soft as tissue😂😂. Does she live in a bubble filled with rainbows, butterflies and unicorns. She’s the same one that said MW1 campaign of clearing the house was too much for her and it should’ve been non-lethal.

[@factory_enslavement]

You are talking about a different game bud

[@LosPollosHermanosinc]

@@factory_enslavement no bud he’s talking about this game…you aren’t forced to harm people. If people really are sensitive about a mission then maybe they shouldn’t buy the game.

[@tlevs7621]

I’m actually kinda bummed that there’s going to be a mw4 now, knowing rather than something different we’re going to probably just get the same thing in 3 years

[@triplecombogaming]

Modern Warfare runs smoothly on Ps5, shows xbox footage, doesn't elaborate. Wut

[@DJdeliverance]

Well dam don't leave anything to spoil in the already very short story wth

[@knightoath1995]

These developers Are Getting Lazy. They're not Putting any effort in games lately. Especially from how good they used to be.. that's crazy..I miss The MW3

[@ShayanAsim]

Did she just say one forty one instead of one four one??

[@92JoseR]

Well, waiting for a sale on this one.

[@CCPJerBear]

Wouldn't even wait for a sale. I played 15 minutes of it and got a refund. It's that bad.

[@92JoseR]

@@CCPJerBear Yeah after reading all the BS I'm skipping this one. Shame cause I had high hopes after the last two. Story mode included.

[@dctrbrass]

These would be awesome as SP games IMO. As SP modes stand in these types of games, I don't know why they bother making them.

[@beepyou34]

This review is almost exactly the same length as Greg Kasavin's review of the original Call of Duty on PC from 20 years ago.

[@fightwithonefilms]

I would "play" the no Russian mission but I agree it should have an option to skip if it's too upsetting for you

[@djdimo_97official34]

If you think the game is to brutal and too sensitive just don't played especially if you asking for a skip option

[@Code_Dee]

They've had skip options in the past.

[@rodolfohernandez3303]

They manage to even ruin an iconic and controvertial level like No Russian. Asking for 70 dollars for a disaster of a campaign. That's why the Modern Warfare Trilogy the OG from 2007, 2009 and 2011 will always be BEST and never outclassed. I think is time to the COD franchise into a sleep mode for sometime until they resurrect into something that the OG COD had.

[@Trex40385]

I wanted to understand the insistence on Urzkistan (aka Syria). It worked as a presentation of a new saga/modern war at MW19, good, and it was possible to stop there.

[@fadedsteve33]

MW2019 and MW2 had good campaigns. This campaign was meant to be year two DLC and they decided to just make it a full release title. The greed of Activision knows no bounds… $40 is fair for this, but $70 for this campaign and regurgitated MW2 maps is robbery

[@fleetkidn]

Exactly why we should not pre-order!

[@reddchan]

I’m playing on Series X and I can only play the single player campaign while online …

[@SupraPetey]

Would be fantastic if you could edit and use whatever weapon you want……… And used warzone maps to do missions

[@AlexLoeding]

It’s a shame the campaign isn’t being revived very well.. dang I thought this was going to be my first call of duty that I purchase but now I might just stick to Battlefield. Thanks for the in depth review of the campaign.

[@MadsPlaysPCIOS]

I’ve played every single COD campaign ever and I got 3000+ hours in the original MW3 and I played 25 minutes of this new campaign on release and quickly made my very first Steam refund. I strongly recommend the first MW trilogy, it’s great fun and the games can be found dirt cheap.

[@5FmUke]

Can't wait to play this gem.

[@Latinosmassacre-]

Typical 11 yo bobby kotick fan

[@HiddenOne256]

WHO EVER SAYS TASK FORCE ONE FORTY ONE. ITS ONE FOUR ONE, CMONNNNN Xd

[@starwindamada5313]

Reviewer clearly hasn't played, someone else wrote the review and they're just narrating it

[@brycesmith2389]

the 1st cod I'll be waiting on a sale

[@MichaelThomasFrazier]

They’re slowly preparing us for Halo Vs COD:Aliens

[@ShrineMedium]

The ending was the worst for me

[@reiter155]

5/10 is WAYYY too generous, this game is truly turining out to be a bletant scam

[@TriniChiniese]

This is disappointing i am considering to just cancel my preorder and skip this game till it has a price drop . This is not a complete game just a Warzone DLC , from what i am seeing all of this should had been in the campaign in MW2 in the first place and not called MW3 .

[@michaelriverajr8891]

Paying $70 for a dlc? I was actually considering picking this up. After watching your review I'm saving my $70. It's unfortunate that Activision just did a copy and paste of warzone

[@thegame6038]

You guys give now all modes from a game separate review scores? Weird. Let's see if you guys do the same for all games.

[@Itsnotspaghetti]

I'm more surprised they didn't give it a 8.5 or 9 😂 This is the first rating from them that I agree with in a really long time.