CAN INDIA BLOCK CHINA's OIL??? 4K

/ @fermube
Thank you for supporting my Channel!
Buy me a coffee (PayPal): Tip me via WeChat:
paypal.me/Chin... prnt.sc/sv7r5c
Buy me a coffee (BMC):
www.buymeacoff...
I saw this video circulating on Twitter, where the narrator describes how India would be able to counter China's influence given that China's main weakness is the Malacca Strait. It is reported by the narrator that 70% of Chinese oil imports flow through this narrow passage between Malaysia and Indonesia.
For a long time, experts claim the strait can easily be controlled by the Indian Navy and thus prevent China from getting the oil that it needs.
www.usnews.com....
www.cnn.com/20....
www.ismworld.o....
www.spglobal.c...
www.newscienti...
www.eia.gov/to...
www.scmp.com/e...
LIKE, COMMENT, and SHARE this video to your heart's content.
Until I see you again, TAKE IT EZ!
#FerMuBe #TheWuMaoShow
Click here to see my latest video:
goo.gl/2fUP75
Click here to see my most popular video:
goo.gl/wMR5oe
Or click here to visit my channel:
goo.gl/CxUeJa

[@FerMuBe]

Sometimes, you see something online and think to yourself... could this really be true? I've answered that for you here. Let me know what you think.

[@limts9613]

This question should NOT be raised ???

[@jules263]

@@FerMuBe China imports 70% of its energy needs with little petroleum of its own. India is the least of your worries lol

[@dokinglife]

India really need to focus on their own internal issues instead boasting on world power status

[@nirajkafle9147]

Indian Can Win Or Block Oil For China only On You Tube Videos 😂😂🤣

[@amunra5330]

This comment made laugh so hard 🤣

[@milexiangyangli5666]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@milexiangyangli5666]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@milexiangyangli5666]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@Q_QQ_Q]

@@nirajkafle9147 it's only for views

[@taiwanstillisntacountry]

In a Bollywood movie 😂😂😂. Or in their dreams. Read articles about little-India's weapons to Armenia and the Philippines. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@gregwong2132]

@@taiwanstillisntacountry can you link those articles? Thanks in advance

[@melloyellow1836]

@@gregwong2132 Globlal Defense Corp

[@gregwong2132]

@@melloyellow1836 thank you!!

[@desmond7914]

China EW and kill web systems would turn India fighter jets into flying ducks and Indian warships into sitting ducks.

[@manofsan]

TaiwanIsACountry - the reality is that China has sought to bully all its neighbors, and has thus created enemies on all sides. This only increases China's isolation -- which is very much to Xi's liking, since his own political need for power takes priority over the interests of the Chinese people.

[@Lost_Johnny]

If India did try that, it might expect many kinds of reactions, along the border and in the cyber realm, not to mention severely damaging India's economy by stopping the import of raw materials. There are many videos about how powerful India is, but I wouldn't take them very seriously.

[@verypleasantguy]

If India did that, India will be no more, period

[@sootuckchoong7077]

Russia will never export to India anymore.

[@cheungchingtong]

In China, there is a famous national think tank member, also an expert of the China-US relation, once said, India, in Chinese perspective, is more or less a nation with a heart of a princess, hidden in a body of a maid, ambitious without strength, talk too much but do so little, can bully no one but weak little countries like Sikkim around it.

[@danielhutchinson6604]

China has whispered about stopping delivery of products to the USA. The sound of an economy going down the drain could drown out all conversation? Respect for the Nations of the Planet now appear to be something that faces discussion from all the People? The UN has failed to stop the Colonial Efforts of the G-7 to make Asia their private Pickle Barrel. The understanding that respect for the lives of the other Nations of the World bear as much weight as the ability to exploit.

[@cheungchingtong]

@@danielhutchinson6604 Who told you that, China has whispered about stopping delivery of products to the US?

[@danielhutchinson6604]

@@cheungchingtong Just rumors on Internet channels. No Government announcements so far that I have seen. The thought is provocative......

[@cheungchingtong]

@@danielhutchinson6604 I do think the last thing that China wants to do is to "decouple" with the west like what the western medias are propagandizing. Saying China does not want to trade as it being the most powerful industrialized and international trading country, is like saying the US does not want to sell weaponry as it being the most profitable MIC country.

[@PomegranateChocolate]

India bullied China in the 1950s and 60s, and the bullying eventually led to the 1962 war between the two countries. South Tibet was invaded and annexed by India in 1951 and became today's so-called Arunachal Pradesh.

[@SaeedMustapha-l7c]

India should focus on getting their people out of the slums. Spoiler alert.

[@manofsan]

India's standard of living is better than all of its neighbors. Which country are you speaking from? Better not be some IMF-beggar nation

[@user-uy9zm8sf2y]

@@manofsan africa is richer than india even Bangladesh look at gpd per capita lol

[@user-qz7un9ch9f]

And not forget to build enough "good public toilets"... 😂😂😂

[@manofsan]

@@user-uy9zm8sf2y - very strange then that Bangladeshis continue to illegally migrate into India, which you claim is poorer.

[@user-uy9zm8sf2y]

@@manofsan lol because somebody migrate to other countries doesn't mean they are poorer lol, many from USA comes to China to teach English does it means usa is poorer than China lol use your average iq brain

[@fatdoi003]

blocking the malacca straits is an act of war.....

[@FerMuBe]

Must certainly it would be. One that affects the entire world.

[@GuyWhoLikesTheSnarkies1435]

Whoever's making that clip is acting like us Indonesia and Malaysia won't be doing something about it and just let Indian Navy wreaking havoc in the region 😬😬 Gosh, all those online Indian nationalists and their foreign cheerleaders are a bunch of deranged people 😭😭

[@ssrae-2229]

​@@GuyWhoLikesTheSnarkies1435The Andaman and Nicobar islands supposely in Burma"s backyard. Its the British occupied Burma that gifted those 300 islands chain to their Indian colony. Within the Nicobar island is one named Coco which belongs to Myanmar, now host Chinese navy subs. The Andaman chain of islands shares Myanmar, Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia sea territory.

[@GuyWhoLikesTheSnarkies1435]

@@ssrae-2229 I don't know what's the purpose of your writing, but it sounds like you're ignoring the ramification of any resolute response made by Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand in case of any legitimate military build-up in the region.

[@csking6377]

Yes, It would be an act of war against many countries simultaneously.

[@Lennonrx8]

Nah, don't think so... If you ask Russia to Choose between India & China,... You already know the answer....

[@eish3291]

Of course Russia chooses china because India hasn't got much goods that Russia needs. They have forgotten why China is called the world,s factory.

[@lagrangewei]

how can India know which tanker is going to China? if I am a tanker operator i will just run a Saudi-Singapore route, and transfer oil to another tanker in Singapore to carry the oil to China. what is India going to do? sink every tanker? it doesn't even make sense, the reality is despite the NATO blockade on Russia, Russian tanker is still sailing all over the world, you can't stop it. beside, you can entirely avoid the Nicobar Islands by just sail via the Sunda Strait. lastly, any attempt to attack the oil route will affect the Saudi more than China, that would literally force Saudi to side with China and even offer Chinese navy the use of their port to protect the oil. the Indian navy just can't beat the Chinese navy it is a non-issue.

[@ssrae-2229]

You forgot : US or Australia "intelligence" will feed information to India --

[@willengel2458]

it's readily available. even the Houthis know all the ship that passed through.

[@user-ed9so2rb4k]

All these speculations will not happen nor would China seek such unnecessary diversion. If war is declared, China will treat it as such.

[@blcheah2672]

India has more than 20 million people working in the Middle East. If India cuts off the China trade, it will affect all ME economies which trade so much with China. And who is going to need foreign workers if their economy is damaged and they have no money to pay workers? Millions of Indians will go home jobless. And most Muslim countries have strained relations with India. If India screws their economies, they will all redouble support for Pakistan over Kashmir. The blowback to India won't be light.

[@user-ed9so2rb4k]

@@blcheah2672 In the 1st place, can India convince those workers to leave their jobs?? Maybe China can offer robots to replace them.

[@markmahan38]

China has worked with Russia on Siberia one and two lines. These can transfer both LNG and Fossil Fuels. Directly to China without any ships. But also China is the 3rd largest processor of oil. Meaning turning crued oil into gasoline, diesel, and kerosene. Also China is also the monopoly producer of plastics. China also has their own oil wells, I think at least 3 if not more. The Chinese push for independence or sovereignty across the board. Show forward thinking. It is brilliant how they planned for the future. China lacks energy sources, so China plans for both energy production and energy conservation. Absolutely brilliant strategy.

[@iechuanlee9326]

Blocking Malacca straight is a violation of international maritime laws. The USA doesnt respect does india too? The blockage will not just affect China, there are Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Vietnam and the many ithers indirectly or directly. This is just another BS created by these warmongers.

[@igolfer]

I wish India had more scholars and thinkers like Mr. Pravin Sawhney and Mr. Raja Mohan. They are the hope for better India-China relations. But I have to be straight forward and honest. Modi’s visit to Moscow and his meeting with Putin is a sign that Russia is winning the war in Ukraine; otherwise, Modi would not dare to appear associated with Putin under imminent pressure from the U.S. I really don’t understand why politicians in the West like to talk about war with China. China brings hope, peace, prosperity, construcción, human dignity to the world, while the U.S. stokes conflicts, wars, regime changes, destructions and fears. India also likes to talk about how bad China is, as if it can be very useful for the U.S. One Indian woman so-called international relations expert said in one interview on an Indian television talk show that Russia should know that China may not always be Russia’s friend or partner, it could one day be a big threat to Russia, but India will always be. It reminds me of what Joe Biden told Putin in their 2020 meeting in Europe, that Russia should be aware of potential Chinese trouble along their over 5000 miles shared border. Now we know who is the real threat and who is a friend in need to Russia’s existence. India has never won anything in its fights against China. Now, Modi goes to Mosco to kiss Putin’s ass, as if India were essentially relevant in the geopolitical entanglement among the world’s superpowers. But the world knows India is nothing but a useless idiot, an opportunistic prostitute. India could be a great partner with Russia, with the U.S. and with China. That would be beneficial and advantageous that no other country would enjoy; however, India is willingly and voluntarily being used as a vassal state in the geopolitical contention between the U.S. and China. In the end, no one would trust India to be their reliable friend or partner.

[@FerMuBe]

I have a video on neutrality coming soon. India’s role is of extreme importance for peace regardless of our views. Stay tuned.

[@danielhutchinson6604]

The Concept of "Asian Unity", after centuries of Colonial Exploitation, appears to be a thought that most Politicians and economists in G-7 Nations , are incapable of saying. But there it is...... They appear to step on CIA Spooks like Cockroaches. The G-7 now has to deal with BRICS. The ability to set the price for resources, no longer is a privilege of the West.

[@alanhamford2538]

When push comes to shove you are either with the US or against it. No third option. India has signed its Military Treaties with the US.

[@starnight1209]

India should ask her people not to make babies anymore that is the only hope she has.

[@user-ed9so2rb4k]

@@alanhamford2538 , If US is cocksure of the outcome, they would have engaged Putin in Ukraine!

[@ronluke7156]

The question is not "can India block.....? It should read why should India block China oil?

[@GuyWhoLikesTheSnarkies1435]

India: Buys Russian and Venezuelan oils and sells them to the highest bidder in the West* China: Definitely a major oil/gas importer from Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia etc, for the sake of the country's own domestic interests* Also India: *"We need to block Chinese energy export from coming to our nation!"* Imagine making a strawman and exercising mental gymnastic as your foreign policy 😵😵

[@blcheah2672]

They do this all the time. China is India's favorite scapegoat and bogeyman and straw man for hating.

[@wdp7128]

One bemused question, How exactly does the Indian Navy intended to blockade north melaka strait, without meeting fast and furious naval response from PLA Navy?? 😂😂😂

[@azharidris7092]

Fermube.. India is laugh.. people should listen to jayanth bhandari.. to know what India really is like.. it's benny hill of the world..

[@TFXJac]

Gwadar-Kashgar Pipeline is in the construction and is expected to start operation in 2027

[@brianliew5901]

Not even in their Bollywood dreams. 😂😂😂

[@user-sf1nq9uj7p]

"Can India block China's oil?" The answer is an irrevocable, "NO - it is NOT possible" China gets oil not only from the Middle East but through Russia as well and the last time I looked, Russia is located above China and far removed from India way down the south. An oil pipeline is being established to run from Russian oilfields to China and short of India blowing up that overland pipeline and blocking the sea routes (which are in INTERNATIONAL waters, not the Indian Ocean), it is just impossible without invoking an all-out war. Besides that, India trades with Russia as well and crossing into Russian territory to blow up the overland pipeline is tantamount to an invasion of Russian land and the same thing goes if India tried doing that in Chinse soil. It is massively illogical.

[@willengel2458]

India knows it better than anybody else. NO. India and China are not in the same class. it is the Empire of Lies with its naval base in Singapore. if its comes to that, then DF Express, rockets and missiles will keep the empire honest. the empire is retreating from the first island chain.

[@user-yo8ku7eq2x]

Imports of Middle East hydrocarbons as a share of China's total Middle East imports ranged from 73.0 percent in 2020 to 83.8 in 2022. Combined with imports in the chemicals industry, which includes petrochemicals, the share ranged from 88.5 percent (2020) to 92.4 percent (2022). You really need to do your research. I mean come on. A 10 year old could google this. Shame on you for not doing your research. Russia now accounts for 19% of China's oil imports. Shutting oil from the Middle East would cause a complete collapse of the Chinese economy and mass starvation within less than 9 months. DO YOUR RESEARCH!!!!!!!

[@manofsan]

The bulk of China's maritime commerce goes through the Malacca Straits. Oil is just one part of that. The strategic importance of the Malacca Straits is not expected to go down in the coming decades

[@wymmyw8744]

not just with the seller.. but with the buyer.. lol.. therefore it's possible.. if india wanna self-destruct..

[@danwelterweight4137]

Guess who is India's largest trading partner? China

[@jayjaywoodland]

china can still sail below sumatera island and go thru java strait, by passing Malacca strait...

[@eish3291]

True it,s a slightly longer route but then Chinese warships would escort these tankers anyway.

[@multipolarw]

India should focus eradicate call center scams and improve the quality of public toilets ,

[@blcheah2672]

It won't change anything. Because there is very little civic consciousness, and public toilets are very quickly vandalized. Toilet paper is always stolen. Sometimes entire sinks and cisterns can be stolen by people who take these and resell!

[@existentialbaby]

Love the real talk. Subscribed from India.

[@FerMuBe]

Welcome to my channel.

[@siewkonsum7291]

China has long trusted allies of Yanmar & Thailand since ancient times. In due course, Chinese maritime bases with military assets would be allowed to be built in the coastal lines of these 2 countries which share the Indian Ocean. The Chinese can use those immediate military assets to counter any sea line blockages by the Indian Government.

[@blcheah2672]

Myanmar has long been afraid of India and also has territorial disputes with India as well as the longstanding fear of illegal immigration into border areas. If India gets too aggressive in the Indian Ocean, its neighbors may all side China just to avoid being dominated by India.

[@desmond7914]

India have influence outside India, doubt so? India is a poor country but are top in talking, as good as US propaganda, but zero performance. Remember Modi blew his trumpet so loud when he send his warships to the Red Sea to hunt for the culprits that attacked Indian ships near India. The Indian warships are back and Modi should inform the world that he achieved next to nothing except for the arrest of a few pirates that have to be fed in Indian prisons.

[@edhiepitz]

I still remember that they kill a lot of doves and claim that they're CCP spies

[@FerMuBe]

@edhiepitz I remember that… some of indias media is very colorful media🤣,

[@desmond7914]

@@edhiepitz Pity the spy-pigeon that was tortured for eight months in an Indian prison. But the pigeon still maintain its honour and did not switch side. Animal NGOs, however, looked the other way.

[@Hocksan3333]

@@desmond7914 It is the toddy (coconut brew) talking… after a few shots they will oozing out the impossible dream. They singlehandedly confront all the super powers!

[@singsing818]

NATO.....as good as US propaganda, but zero performance

[@user-ed7rz7nl5i]

Endia has a big mouth! Just talk cheap and no action !

[@femcel101]

dude china can literally use Pakistan Highway lol

[@moss550]

Given the speed of China's green energy transition, China probably don't need oil by 2030

[@andrewlin6136]

This is why China 🇨🇳 is building different routes from middle East and Russia

[@donkeykong516]

Don’t forget the CPEC that can ship oil via Pakistan

[@kazegarasu4704]

Thorium reactor ..TMSR-LF1 , China just finished it on 2021 .. How did we miss it ..

[@lktan224]

Modi hugged everybody. Modi hugged Biden and come back a changed man. Then he hugged Putin and come back a changed man. Double face Modi.😂

[@寒山居士]

note that all the fresh water resources of india originate in the plateau of tibet! food for thought!

[@Anonymous------]

China can get oil directly from Russia if it wants. Putin rather loses India to keeping close friend with China. Russia and China are very close military and trade strategic partners, but not with India. India can't do without water flowing from China though. If India builds dams to store water flowed in from China, then all China has to do is make rivers to divert water to elsewhere, then India won't get a drop!

[@agusjusup]

Ohhh..bukankah India ada sungai gangga .

[@jameschu512]

Don't India benefits from trade with China or stifles its growth?

[@jJustPlayingNZ]

Hopefully the more that countries come to realize how interwoven all their economies are then hostilities which cause disruptions to global supply chains will be resisted by everyone. These interrelationships of trade will only become more complex as time goes by. It should be becoming obvious to all governments that sanctions and disruptions can rebound quickly and unexpectedly on the perpetrators. The recent example of how the USA's chip sanctions against China have caused the USA unexpected problems with their own space program proves this point.

[@miralu1279]

印度工商業就崩潰了🤣

[@petersmangalisongoma2013]

Who said India is an ally of America 😅

[@jjl4381]

India is no:1 in the world in BS - so don't worry. India knows that.

[@georgejesson1944]

BRICS needs to dump the current "letter I". Way too many conflicts of interests.

[@FerMuBe]

Indonesia is a country on the rise… that would save the acronym 🤣

[@Anonymous------]

@@FerMuBe Or Iran.

[@multipolarworldorder]

Half of China's Vehicles are EVs in 2024 - this will increase - do not need as much oil.

[@Rex-ww4cw]

No but even if they do, China is shifting their automotive towards EV anywhere. You can get electric from all sort of renewable and unrenewable energy unlike ICE vehicles where it only rely on oil

[@user-yo8ku7eq2x]

actually almost ALL of the electricity to provide energy for the electric cars in China is from Coal power.

[@wesleyclayton1168]

Blockage would mean declaration of war

[@steveleong1389]

Nothing better else to discuss !!!

[@tkhong1940]

India is not stupid to do so even with amer backup. China can also cut water to ind...

[@chongsewaun930]

Fernando your presentation is clear and precise. Thank you very much.

[@FerMuBe]

Thank you!

[@ngheanchoong]

very good story

[@FerMuBe]

Many many thanks

[@georgewilder7423]

India has a minor border dispute with China, then wait until they try to block the oil passage. It wont be a hot rogan josh that'll cause heavy sweating...🤣🤣

[@georwoogle]

✌✌✌

[@romarpromo8190]

Intresting!!!!But China also have oil.

[@FerMuBe]

Yes, you are right… in Xinjiang!!!

[@snake9370]

No...laaaa Not to worry India not that silly To be used by US India , Smart n .... .......

[@edie930]

Only india dream😄😄😄

[@RealKevinChan]

I haven't seen the original tweet but it seems like someone is putting the idea into people's heads to generate mistrust between India & China. India is not burdened, not even inconvenienced in any way, by ships passing through that route; that's why ships to & from almost every country - not just China - have been doing it since time immemorial. However, if they were to block only those ships meant for China as suggested, it is essentially a declaration of war. If the USA were subjected to such a belligerent act, it would promptly send its warships rather than protest about the block's legality in the UN & wait for a resolution. China could & would likely do the same. And you can bet the countries that are sending the oil to China would not be siding with India on this one.

[@Avatar_2025]

India, China and Russia are neighbours on the same continent.

[@Anonymous------]

The question should be "Should China Block Water Flow into India?"

[@rockychan4739]

😂😂😂👍👍👍

[@acuantjahyadi7393]

Fernando murni. Anda lucu Apakah anda mabok kecubung. 😂😂 anda jangan menanyakan mengenai China dengan warga kensington street 😂😂

[@aspiringfalcons842]

India can do it and then face the consequences. It gains nothing and loses a lot more. So no.

[@MichaelGoodgame]

I follow the news headline when did China and India go to war? Was at the recent BRIC's meeting???

[@FerMuBe]

As the video explains, this is commentary on a popular video circulating on Twitter. It’s by a company/account COGGNIZE

[@danwelterweight4137]

Guess who is India's largest trading partner? China Basically India would be blockading itself. The straight of Malacca is not the only path to get goods from the Middle East and Europe to the South China Sea. There are routes through Indonesia. Plus the Indian navy, neither the US navy are large enough and don't have the logistics to carry out such an operation. Furthermore, people who are saying these things don't know what the heck they are talking about or been to the Straight of Malacca. They have never been to that area. There literally tens of thousands ships going through there. Would the Indian Navy board and inspect all of them? Moreover China is not the only one getting oil and trade through the Straights of Malacca. Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Philippines and many other countries. And guess what all their supply chains are deeply intertwined with China's. Again, would India board all of the oil tankers and ships going through the region. Even if India were able to do so. The only thing the tankers and ships would have to do is falsify their documents. Then there is the Chinese navy. China could literally send its navy and sink the entire Indian navy. Then there are the other trading partners from China in the Middle East. How do you think Saudi Arabia, UAEand Iran would feel it India were to blockade their trade with their largest trading partner. European and North American supermarket shelves wojlr be empty in 1 to 2 weeks. Remember China manufacturers 1/3 of everything in the world. And the other 2/3 of things that are not produced in China have their trade routes highly intertwined with China. It's sounds a lot fun to talk about these

[@k3pm909]

America tech company is dependent on India such as customer service and etc. cause it’s cheap 😅

[@Q_QQ_Q]

Because they've to hire non whites that's why.

[@agabrielian]

Why would India block Chinese trade?

[@FerMuBe]

That’s a question for the people who made the video I’m replying to: Coggnize - you can see their name on the video at the beginning of mine.

[@multipolarworldorder]

China leads the world in Battery technology - CATL

[@picandvideo]

Holly cow! Really? Is it possible! 😂🤣😄

[@MrHongyinpui]

Ha Ha.Ha

[@hansweissmann_xviii6754]

Well, 1962 still lingers in the Indian minds. Together with the fact that New Delhi is less than 500 km from the Chinese border, they are aware of the possible consequences of that projected action. However, from the Murican perspective, that naval blockade makes sense.

[@brianliew5901]

The US navy has full control of the Red Sea and the Houthis are running away. 😂😂😂😂

[@danielhutchinson6604]

No sarcasm intended...........Right?

[@brianliew5901]

@@danielhutchinson6604 This is the kind of news Americans love. 😂😂😂

[@danielhutchinson6604]

@@brianliew5901 Sensationalism has always been the great disturbance of Peace.

[@brianliew5901]

@@danielhutchinson6604 The weird thing is that Uncle Sam informed its allies to send their warships there while commanding its own to get out of harm's way. 😂😂😂😂

[@danielhutchinson6604]

@@brianliew5901 The ability of Uncle Sam to find Pocket Change to fuel the various Fleets that were capable of Gunboat Diplomacy, seems to encounter the same difficulty the Royal Navy encountered after WW2. The struggle to exploit other nations resources now seems to face challenges on more than one front. Economic struggles were limiting the ability to enforce authority in 1967. The introduction of Fiat Currency to G-7 Nations now even seems to be limited in the power to provoke Poor Nations into positions that can allow domination. We are living in a period of Economic transition once again. That fact appears to be providing some interesting questions?

[@theansangong2659]

Malacca Strait !

[@user-gp9mk7wm1s]

When US sanctioned India over nuclear tests in 1998. India immediate reaction was: "What about China... we are the largest democracy... blah.. blah.." Childish reaction like my kindergarten classmate denouncing his friends when he only ( but not his friends) got caught "wrong doings" by the teacher.

[@DineshTwanabasu]

And who has the largest Navy? Is it India or china?

[@ssrae-2229]

@@DineshTwanabasu India has by far the LARGEST Curry gravy in the World . 😄😄

[@user-yo8ku7eq2x]

By tonnage. The US. By Blue Water Capability. The US by such a wide margin that it is bigger than the rest of the world combined....then Japan...Then several other countries. China is not even on the list. Almost all Chinese ships have a range of less than 1000 miles. That is 500 miles out...and 500 miles back. In a straight line. Pretty darn good for defending your coast line...Not much else.

[@cheungchingtong]

@@user-yo8ku7eq2x lol good try

[@Arie-Z]

@user-yo8ku7eq2x ehh what do u mean not even on the list. Their 2nd in the world by tonnage.

[@DineshTwanabasu]

@@user-yo8ku7eq2x little knowledge is dangerous man.

[@HappyPandaBear73]

👍🇨🇳🙂☮️🌏❗️

[@multipolarworldorder]

China obtains most of their oil from Russia.

[@Jojo_KokoUK]

Indian Navy Ship Brahmaputra has Self Sinking Ability....😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@ongsengfook]

New Delhi is near China India border. Can be an easy target. Remember Indian population is concentrated along Himalaya. Any conflict with China will adversely affect India.

[@peterkogl1329]

BS 😮😮😮

[@gfan003]

Well If India build a good navy That is. Just Recently one of India's flag ship sunk while been docked for repair😅, and it's not the First one as previously something similar happened not long ago. Not Just ships, jets and planes as well, usually a jet fighter will fall out of sky after a quick repair. China now deploying next generation of destroyers like 055b which are equiped with state of art technology Such as railguns, laser cannons, microwave cannons, vertical launchers for hypersonic missiles and attack Drone submarines; 076 Drone carrier; 094C nuclear subs equiped with anti-satelite laser cannons; 6 gen stealth figters with detachable Drone parts and more. The Chinese quantum computer simulated wars in South and East China sea over a thousand times, result is that US and allies Had close to 0% chance of winning. No Wonder why US suddenly showed all their nuclear Arsenal suddenly. Maybe in another hundred years That India become Strong enough to stop China.

[@stickerred]

繼波音三哥總裁太空船漏氣，再来微软藍屏，一波接一波。霸气侧漏。😂😂😂

[@no7of2001]

India needs internal nationalism and a tough stance against China to consolidate its tottering rule, otherwise it will face division.

[@agusjusup]

Bagaimana India bisa blok armada laut China?, sementara Rusia sulit membelanjakan rupe India..🤕 , petro China petro Yuan perlahan pasti gantikan dolar , India harus mampu petrorupe🤣

[@colinchia5318]

Spend your time at poverty.shame on you.

[@xyyyyx3247]

As BRICS+ partners, it would seem strange that India would act in that manner.

[@FerMuBe]

My thought exactly. Why the guys from Coggnize would put this on social media is beyond me… but that video has been seen millions of times around the globe on Twitter alone.

[@gelinrefira]

It's just western fantasy of westoids who have no understanding of actual geopolitics.

[@k3pm909]

Child rappers

[@samsulazlanosman2287]

be4 you cntinue with your idea, i'd like to tell you about china progress, they negotiated thier idea for land bridge in thailand only to test the US, if it happen its for thier cargo ships of export items, they already made an agreement with pakistan and mongolia to have thier pipe laid within pakistan and mongolia for oil from saudi and russia through to thier country, there's no need for them to worry about oil flow to china,

[@wish8442]

The land bridge in Thailand doesn't seem very practical because it would require 2 ships instead of one. It is also subjected to ever unpredictable Thai politics. The Siberia II and the Pakistan corridor projects are facing delays but will eventually be built and will vastly improve oil import from Russia.

[@PomegranateChocolate]

India has been a bully since its creation in 1947 because it sees itself as the rightful successor to the British Raj and follows in the Raj's footsteps of expansionism. India has land grabbed its neighbors, including China. Here is a timeline of how South Tibet was gobbled up by India to become today's so-called Arunachal Pradesh. 1912: In the first full year of the Republic of China after the fall of the Qing dynasty, the United States National Geographic Magazine dedicated an issue to China. Accompanying the issue is a large and detailed fold-out map of China. The map clearly shows that Dirang Dzong (德讓宗) and Tawang (達旺) are within the boundary of China. 1943: British India likely calculated that dealing with the Lhasa government was easier than with the Republic of China's Nationalist Government in extracting land concessions and proposed to the United States to recognize Tibet's right to exchange diplomatic representatives with other powers. The Americans rejected this proposal: "The Government of the United States has borne in mind the fact that the Chinese Government has long claimed suzerainty over Tibet and that the Chinese constitution lists Tibet among areas constituting the territory of the Republic of China. This Government has at no time raised a question regarding either of those claims." 1944: British India annexed Dirang Dzong (德讓宗), a Tibetan-settled area. Dzong means fort in Tibetan. The Chinese Government (the Nationalist Government of the Republic of China, seated in Kunming at the time because of World War II) protested to the British. So did the Tibetan Lhasa government. 1945: British India intruded into the tribal area of South Tibet. February 1947: The Chinese Nationalist Government lodged a complaint with the Indian mission, which was by then newly established in China, on British India's border intrusions into Chinese territory. August 1947: Britain left South Asia, and India was created as the successor polity to the departed British. India's creation means that a country that historically did not exist suddenly appears on China's doorstep. October 1947: The Tibetan Lhasa Government dispatched a formal request to New Delhi, asking the newly independent Indian Government to withdraw all its predecessors' intrusions into the territory between the McMahon Line and the traditional border beneath the foothills and return a wide swath of territory from Ladakh to Assam, including Sikkim and the Darjeeling district. 1949: When the defeat of the Nationalist Government in China's civil war was imminent, the Republic of China's ambassador in New Delhi reminded the Indian Government that China did not recognize the McMahon Line and held the Simla Convention invalid. October 1949: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) took control of the mainland, and its civil war rival, the Republic of China, retreated to Taiwan. December 1949: India recognized the People's Republic of China as the legitimate government, effectively cutting off the diplomatic channel the Republic of China used to deliver its protests to India. February 1951: India annexed Tawang (達旺), the birthplace of the Sixth Dalai Lama and home to the four-hundred-year-old Tawang Monastery. The Tibetan authorities in Lhasa protested but were simply informed by the Indian political officer that India was taking over Tawang. The Tibetans protested again, accusing the Indian Government of 'seizing as its own what did not belong to it.' The Tibetans went on to ask New Delhi to withdraw its forces from Tawang immediately. The protests were ignored. The Republic of China (which had already retreated to Taiwan by then and had no diplomatic relation with India) also vehemently denounced India's territorial travesty. Curiously the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) made no noise. October 1951: The PLA (Peoples’ Liberation Army) seized Lhasa, capturing the last remaining part of mainland China (except South Tibet) that was up to that point beyond the Communist control. 1954: India published a new map showing South Tibet as part of India. The map also shows the two neighbors of China, Sikkim and Bhutan, as part of India. Sikkim has been a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years and has enjoyed good relations. In the 18th century, Sikkim was briefly overrun by the Nepalese Gorkhas, and the Sikkim king fled to China seeking help. The then Qianlong emperor dispatched an expedition to Sikkim, expelled the Gorkhas, and restored Sikkim's sovereignty and independence. Sikkim remained unmolested for the rest of its history until it was annexed by India in 1975. Bhutan is another neighbor of China, and their proximity is evident simply by comparing the flags of Bhutan and the Qing dynasty of China. January 1959: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) commented for the first time on the issue of South Tibet when Zhou Enlai, in a letter to Nehru, offered to concede South Tibet to India. However, India rejected the offer, as it also claims Aksai Chin as part of India. Aksai Chin is located in an area that is very hard to access from the Indian side due to difficult terrain. This is evidenced by the fact that China was able to build a road there over two years without India even noticing, and India only became aware of it when reading an article from China describing the construction project. This clearly indicates that India not only has no control over the area but also lacks visual access to the region. 1960: India started establishing posts (border markers) north of South Tibet (north of the McMahon Line) and proclaiming that it has the right to unilaterally 'improve' the McMahon Line as it sees fit. October 1962: After years of warning, China attacked India's position in South Tibet and recovered Tawang shortly. Three weeks later, in a second wave, China recovered the whole of South Tibet. November 1962: China unilaterally withdrew back to the north of the McMahon line. 1975: India annexed Sikkim. 1987: India made South Tibet a state and renamed it the so-called Arunachal Pradesh. The Republic of China (Taiwan) put out a statement denouncing India. Here is the statement: "In regard to the issue of the Indian government's illegal occupation of our country's territory and the establishment of the so-called 'Arunachal Pradesh,' the foreign ministry of the Republic of China issued the following announcement at midnight: India's illegal occupation of our country's territory has been repeatedly stated by the Government of the Republic of China as something it will not recognize. Recently, the Indian Congress unilaterally passed the establishment of 'Arunachal Pradesh' to the south of the so-called McMahon Line. The Indian Government also made it a state. The Government of the Republic of China once again solemnly proclaims that the Government of India intends to legitimize its illegal occupation of Chinese territory. The Government of the Republic of China regards this as illegal, void, and absolutely not recognized." 2008: With the return of Hong Kong to China, Britain effectively withdrew from its colonial involvement in Asia, and Tibet lost its utility as a potential bargaining chip in British negotiations with China concerning Hong Kong. With no remaining interests in Tibet, Britain could afford to be forthright for once. The British government issued a statement acknowledging China's sovereignty over Tibet (previously recognized as suzerainty, not sovereignty). This statement, endorsed by both the Conservative and Labour parties, is notable for its candor in admitting Britain's past territorial ambitions in Tibet and adopts an almost apologetic tone. Here is an excerpt: "...But our position is unusual for one reason of history that has been imported into the present: the anachronism of our formal position on whether Tibet is part of China, and whether in fact we harbour continued designs to see the break-up of China. We do not.​​ Our ability to get our points across has sometimes been clouded by the position the UK took at the start of the 20th century on the status of Tibet, a position based on the geopolitics of the time. Our recognition of China's "special position" in Tibet developed from the outdated concept of suzerainty. Some have used this to cast doubt on the aims we are pursuing and to claim that we are denying Chinese sovereignty over a large part of its own territory. We have made clear to the Chinese Government, and publicly, that we do not support Tibetan independence. Like every other EU member state, and the United States, we regard Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China. "​​ 2014: A Tibetan Chinese named Nido Tania from Arunachal Pradesh (occupied South Tibet) went to Delhi and was beaten to death because he 'looked Chinese.' 2024: In the 1990s, India subtly probed the People's Republic of China (PRC), leading to the inference that China's position on South Tibet had hardened, despite the PRC officially maintaining ambiguity on the matter. It has become evident that China's earlier offer to cede South Tibet is no longer available, as China has explicitly stated that South Tibet is part of its territory. This stance mirrors the positions of both the Tibetan Lhasa Government and its civil war rival, the Republic of China (Taiwan).

[@cheekeongchan6605]

Interesting writeup. The border issue started in the 1914 Simla Conference where the McMahon line was drawn on a map which was signed by the British Empire/British India, Tibetan and Chinese reps. The Chinese govt rejected the new border and never signed the agreement which was only signed by British Empire/British India and Tibet. After 1947, India maintained the new border which China disputed. After 110 years, both India & China should nego and settle the dispute.

[@PomegranateChocolate]

@@cheekeongchan6605 Minor correction. The so-called McMahon line was not in the Simla Convention. It was a diplomatic forgery added to it decades later. Two copies of the original treaties survived, and they didn't have the McMahon line. One original copy is kept at Oxford University. Another thing is the Chinese representative never signed the treaty. The Tibetan representative did. He was immediately repudiated by the Lhasa government when he returned back to Lhasa.

[@wish8442]

The British also fraudulently changed the border between Myanmar and China, giving Myanmar territories which were Chinese.

[@user-gh5uj1od5l]

any one or any nation that turn their minds into scheming wickedness unto their neighbors. always harm itself for indulging on it! WHY? it's true, in this world, Satan is "mighty". BUT Satan extract first blood from those needing its help for evil! because Satan Does Not own this world! it needs permission from GOD to act. Hence, The REAL ALMIGHTY IS GOD! HE IS GOOD! HE Protects all of HIS creations!

[@whitefox9]

India would be like America if india does American bidding

[@user-td1ob4kd1m]

This topic is very interesting. But the very title of the topic should have you, Fernando, wonder how and why it is possible for India, a "founding" member of the BRICS like China, to want to "block China's oil"...

[@FerMuBe]

There have been calls for Indonesia to replace India. India’s “neutrality” is too fluid for everyone’s comfort.

[@GuyWhoLikesTheSnarkies1435]

They're just jealous, they want to import China's imported oil and gas for cheap prices so that they can resell them to the market at higher price tag. But instead, China choose to make better use of their oil & gas reserve to generate added values into their export.

[@shuilong52]

crap ==

[@whitefox9]

This is rubbish It's making a story on could have would have but nothing happened You becoming a GOSSIPER

[@FerMuBe]

The gossip is from COGGNIZE - the makers of the video I debunked. I expect your apology.

[@glass8289]

Why would India want to Block China Oil? Both India and China are trading for 1000's of years. Except this border issue, which is created by british, china and India are prosperous economies living together for 1000's of years. not sure why this kind of misinformation is coming from. I thought you are a journalist. why need to use a click bait title to spread hate between 2 countries?

[@FerMuBe]

I’m not a journalist. The thumbnail asks a question and the video answers it. Can India block China’s oil? Answer is: No. BTW, the video is a reply to a video being circulated on social media by a group called “coggnize” I’m here to correct THAT disinformation.

[@glass8289]

@@FerMuBe Sorry, My apologies. I thought it's just a live stream. hence didn't checked your content fully. Sorry again. Just wanted to say this. India never wants to be an ally with west. For past 50 years india is a non aligned country and does what is best for it's people. we don't want war with anyone. Thanks for correcting the disinformation.

[@FerMuBe]

@glass8289 no worries. There are forces out there trying to separate China and India when there is no reason. This video hopes to render those “social media” posts ineffective. Cheers!

[@ncchew3356]

This is not misinformation. Looking at the past to predict the future is not a correct way to think. As long as Uncle Sam is around to instigate, anything bad can happen. India would be more than foolish to impose a blockage of the passage of Chinese oil. Chinese superior naval strength would crush the blockage and inflict such heavy casualties on the Indian navy that it would not forget for a very long time. We can bet that Uncle Sam would not side with India to engage in a naval battle against China. There should always be freedom of navigation in the Malacca Straits just as there is in the South China Sea even though Uncle Sam has been harping endlessly on freedom of navigation there.

[@ssrae-2229]

the Indians are boasting they have a invincible Naval base (backed by US UK and allies)) in the Andaman and Nicobar islands. Check the map, the 300 or so islands chain is located just South of Myanmar near Thailand"s Phuket island.

[@TheProBush]

How much are the US paying you?

[@FerMuBe]

I thought I was a CCP paid shill.., 🤣🤣🤣 Must double check my bank account balance.

[@georgequek7996]

BS MEDIA MAN😷

[@horace68]

Indian capital Delhi is only 350 km from Chinese border, the PLA just have to unleash several thousand cheap maneuverable rockets from the border and Delhi is history, China has this geography advantage which India forgot. Moreover when there is a need the PLA can just station couple of destroyers such as 052D and plus two more 055B the Indian navy will be cut off from Andaman sea and Melaka straight, even the US aircraft carriers will think twice about blockading this region as can be seen from what happened in SCS, Indian is nothing burger.

[@chuthao6303]

LMFAO REMEMBER THAT USA THING CALLED RIGHT OF MARITIME PASSAGE?

[@wongkokpey1283]

India can content China is mely wishfully thinking. Those politic expats have no knowledge on geography and history. First Delhi only within 400km from China's border with China's sonic missiles the Chinese PLA can wipeout India's capital within 2 miniute. Second China and India are neighbor for few thousands year, based on historical statistics India are 100% loser, India's army only can win Chinese army by mouth (India's media) or by Bollywood. Please show me any convincing evidence from international third party which support India's national army has beaten the Chinese.

[@aubergine10]

What do I and C stand for in BRICS?

[@arifminhas1699]

BY ONLY TELLING HALF THE STORY, YOU HAVE LOST ALL CREDIBILITY. Half your story is correct. Let me remind you of the missing half. You conveniently ignore 2 major sea/land routes as options. China and Iran have a major multi Billion $ deal for oil and infra. The oil can be transported from Iran to China via Afghanistan by train. Similarly, the Pakistan Gawadar Port is a less likely option (since the American led regime change operation ) … this was the option … sea route from gulf to Gawadar Port and then land/train transport to China…… LUCKILY, THE DIRECT RUSSIAN PIPELINES HAVE DIMINISHED THE IMPORTANCE OF THESE OPTIONS. on th flip side, you conveniently avoided and repercussions for India. If they fall into the lap of the American to block oil flow via the Straits, then a severe backlash from both Russia and China is a given. India will be denied the $130 Billion of imports from China, as well as the Himalayan frontier will be opened by China. China can fight on 3 fronts ….NOT INDIA. It can hardly manage to hold one front with China …. You think Pakistan will wait??? Nay …. Pakistan will attack the western borders of India. You think the Middle Eastern countries will sit and watch India block the oil flow from the Straits … NAY …. They will block sale of oil to India and probably also expel the more than a million Indian laborers from their soil. Russia will also NOT SELL oil to India ….. SO ALL IN ALL, A COMPLEX ACTION/REACTION SCENARIO …. LEARN TO PLAY, “”WHAT IF “” scenarios. So learn to look at all possible angles. And then try to look smart.

[@adiba9734]

The thing is the straith of malaca it self was own by indonesia, malaysia and small part by singapore. And if india was block the straith for their own interest it definitly this 3 country would reacted

[@ssrae-2229]

don't forget there are 15 million Malays, 8 million Chinese and only 2.5 million Indians in Malaysia. Indonesia have fewer or no Indians, but have around 3 million ethnic Chinese and S'pore has 3.5 million ‼️​@@adiba9734

[@FerMuBe]

I think you failed to watch the video in its entirety.

[@MegaSuehan]

Watch the whole video.

[@csking6377]

I think you are an extremely rude and arrogant person who thinks too highly of yourself. No, you don't look smart at all.

[@spikermike2843]

LoL don't be funny now

[@chingtuckmeng1122]

Ejecting dung