Can we see evidence for Noah's Flood at the Grand Canyon? - Dr. Steve Austin

This video segment is from "Beyond Is Genesis History? Vol 1 : Rocks & Fossils," the follow-up to our feature-length film where we explore the impact of the global Flood on the Earth. Check it out on our website: bit.ly/BIGH-1.
Geologist Steve Austin takes us to the bottom of the Grand Canyon, where he explains how the global Flood of Noah's day is evidenced by an intercontinental erosion surface called the Great Unconformity and the thick layers of sand, shale, and limestone (called the Sauk Sequence) making up the canyon walls.
Dr. Austin is a field research geologist who has done research on six of the seven continents of the world. His research has taken him by helicopter into the crater on Mount St. Helens, by bush plane onto glaciers in Alaska, by raft through the Grand Canyon, on horseback into the high Sierra, by elevator into the world’s deepest coal mines, by SCUBA onto the Great Barrier Reef, by rail into Korean backcountry, by foot onto barren plateaus of southern Argentina, and by four-wheel drive into remote desert areas of Israel, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Dr. Austin received his PhD from Pennsylvania State University in sedimentary geology.
For more information on Dr. Austin, please visit: bit.ly/34i18pj.
----------------------------------------------------
✨ Looking to learn more about Genesis and Creation?
🦕 Visit our blog for helpful articles: bit.ly/3d306R1
🍃 Free Videos: bit.ly/3e1HRgc
🌌 Questions & Answers: bit.ly/3d0EG6T
🔬 Help support the advancement of creation science: bit.ly/genesis...

[@flamingpieherman9822]

This is an excellent presentation. I've noticed that those who believe in evolution are not open minded to science or to any other line of thought other than their own. But if you want to believe in real science you have to be able to accept all possibilities not just your own hypothesis or set of beliefs

[@daboffey]

@@patldennis Evolution is a fairy tale.

[@Jeremy9697]

@@daboffey lmao there's more evidence for evolution then a flood that has been proven to never happen. The Bible states the earth is flat and slavery was okay with God. Your Bible is a child's story book. Real scientist know the earth is much older then 6000 years.

[@alanthompson8515]

@@daboffey So, would you agree (on the same "reasoning") that other fairy tales include gravity, electricity, vaccinations, cell phones and the internet?

[@mickeybrown9052]

@@patldennis Darwin started off as a geologist.

[@Jeremy9697]

This is not real science, this is a attempt to push science to fit a creationist agenda. Real science and geology have already proof the earth is much older then 6000, we did not live along side dinosaurs lmao, the was a super continent, and Noah's ark could not of fit 2 of every species let alone food for a year. Terrestrial plants can't survive in salt water. That alone debunks Noah's flood not tension there are cultures with history longer then us with no record of a flood.

[@bear________]

When I watch the evidence, explained from a evolution perspective, it's like having the evidence put in a blender and then spoon fed a bunch of garbage and I get a stomach ache. In contrast, the genisis story, I get excited, I'm ready to learn, can't get enough and the ppl in your video, I feel at ease with, heart warming, the others give me the creeps!

[@nathanspark4876]

no man is simply you incapable of understanding simple things, VERY SIMPLE THINGS.

[@a_randomuser4]

Nah, dude, you're just a dumba*s who couldn't understand something simple that has actual evidence; you probably don't even know what evolution is, "explained from a evolution perspective" evolution the mean time is more objective than a perspective, it has been the best explanation so far with evidence.

[@projectdesign4675]

Scientist tend to glaze over (visually on their faces even) when you explain the proven theory of the flood. Anyone knows if your off a 1/10th of a degree,you've missed the point by a million miles!

[@marcusmuse4787]

science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind -Albert Einstein

[@diamondlife-gi7hg]

because it has no soul, cold and bitter tasting fruit it is.

[@AlwaysHopeful87]

Just got back from Salt Lake. Something big happened there. Granite next to a red layers, both oriented in many different ways. Love to see Dr. Austin go there.

[@beestoe993]

I have lived in the Salt Lake area all my life. You are right, signs of massive flooding are vast! There are huge swaths of rounded off lake bottom boulders all over the state. Not just where Lake Bonneville was, but down in the southern desert areas as well. Up Spanish fork canyon (and other places) you can see a massive sequence of lake bottom material up in the mountains! It is obvious from there that Isostacy formed mountain ranges after the flood. I have emailed Dr. Kurt Wise and told him that it is easy to see how the Grand Canyon was formed if you are in Utah. The post flood/Ice age runoff here was immense! And post flood Isostacy forming mountain ranges would have multiplied the post flood catastrophe. In other words, after the great flood covered Arizona in several mega-sequences of mud. Utah, Colorado and Wyoming DUMPED monstrous amounts of water into the Grand Canyon. There are many ancient river beds up north, even from small isolated mountian ranges, feeding into lake Bonneville that are MASSIVE in their width, but only 20-30 feet deep indicating that the post flood ice pack in this area melted very rapidly, creating a post flood flood. I am convinced that THAT is what formed the Grand Canyon! The post flood drainage. I too would love to see these Brilliant men come to Utah. I know they would be in awe.

[@allyshivers3082]

I would too never been to Utah Im in Oklahoma that means that maybe turner falls area may have been formed the same way only its full of trees now Ive been to Arizona though its beautiful

[@justintyme2764]

No we can’t see evidence of Noah’s flood. But you can see evidence of the destruction/flood that took place at the Katabole (satan’s casting down i.e. overthrow. God’s destruction of the first earth and Heaven age).

[@freemind..]

@@justintyme2764 - No. There is a massive amount of evidence of the biblical Flood... many of which defy explanation otherwise.

[@justintyme2764]

@@freemind.. Actually the Katabole, overthrow, foundation IS a Biblical event. So is Noah’s flood. But the destruction revealed within this video is MUCH greater than Noah’s flood. This occurred at the destruction of the first earth and Heaven age as a result of satan’s downfall/overthrow. Respectfully.

[@Rstars11]

I bought the DVD set and this was great prep for our family trip to the Grand Canyon last March. Your explanations make far more sense than the official statements on site!

[@darkeen42]

If you don't understand sciences or logic

[@55Quirll]

@@darkeen42Quite true, I prefer the scientific explanation for what causes this.

[@ryanlemons7831]

man based on comments I’m seeing, it’s almost as if the strict devout science believers fear that the balance of the universe will falter and collapse if creationists are allowed to question the “sciences”.

[@55Quirll]

@@ryanlemons7831 No, quite the contrary, science is based on questions, evidence, not faith, that is the reason science has lifted the standard of living and inventions, not religion.

[@darkeen42]

@@ryanlemons7831 no it's that machine 2000 years about harm torture suffering ignorance forced ignorance they literally tortured people for trying to learn the reality of the world

[@acedia4453]

Was first introduced to Dr. Austin's work my second year as a graduate student at the University of Chicago. There is no room to argue with his research. While the class did not convert people to religion, it did establish the fact that there was a global flood at some point.

[@the_alchemy_method]

Just because man can’t explain it doesn’t mean it’s not possible

[@Dan-lq4op]

The reason some do not believe,, is because not all are called to believe. I will always believe God over man.

[@Jeremy9697]

That's pretty silly to say since the Bible was written by man. Everything you follow it you are believing man not god... great logic

[@itmaster3805]

@@Jeremy9697 Yet there is much logic and wisdom in the Bible, God inspired. God's Word has not altered. Man's science continues to change, the mapping and computer modeling of the Chixalub meteor impact has changed the myth of Uniformitarianism. Human genomics study is crushing the fairy tale of evolution.

[@Jeremy9697]

@@itmaster3805 to say God's word hasn't been altered is something you have no clue of... it was written by men how do you hold them to the same truth as God? How do you know they weren't influenced by the devil? You don't. And the Bible has been revised to fit our world understanding several times

[@Jeremy9697]

@@itmaster3805 do you know what science is? As we better understand our world we build apon our previous science. Almost never do science discover make other science completely wrong. Just a better understanding of what we thought we knew. Man's science? If God created the world then he created science...open your eyea

[@beestoe993]

@@Jeremy9697 The Bible is the most well preserved ancient documentation on the planet. That is no mere coincidence. Written by men, yes. But inspired by God. If you realize the significance of that then you can understand what the others are trying to say. Imagine of you will Moses being instructed what to write in the first 5 books by God himself! By reading the Bible you can see that many things come to pass simply because God will's it. And the Bible is one of his many gifts to us. Satan has tried many times to destroy it, but God wont let him. I know what science is, do you know who the greatest master of science is?

[@antonioperez2623]

I'd love to see this illustrated by animation.

[@izziebon]

I think it has much more power seeing the real thing; it’s not fiction or a cartoon.

[@darkeen42]

@@izziebon it is most certainly fiction. We know where the bible comes from NOT GOD

[@itmaster3805]

@@darkeen42 how is it that 66 books, written by 40 different authors, over 1500+ years, has a central theme, no contradictions, predicts future events, and shows evidence of being influenced from outside of our time domain?

[@Chewligan1]

Yeah 'Dr' Austin would be big bird.

[@darkeen42]

@@itmaster3805 constant contradiction have you read it????? How many people witnessed the resurrection? The most important thing in Christianity is still contradicted in the bible. READ IT!!!!!!!!!! or shut up

[@kenlane9402]

Somebody needs to show that to Bill Nye the science Guy. Loll 😁

[@anthonytoomer353]

“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? Declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? Or who hath stretched the line upon it? Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? Or who laid the corner stone thereof; when the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?” ‭‭Job‬ ‭38:4-7‬ ‭KJVAAE‬‬ How would man know how long it took the Most High to do His will. Who really knows how old the earth really is.

[@six1nyne]

Your answers in the last sentence we all know. Now through a glass darkly but then face to face. Jeremiah 1:5, romans 8:16-19 Marvel not that i say unto thee thou must be born again. Ur welcome. Comeuntochristdotorg

[@projectdesign4675]

I'm a Christian ( I agree with scripture), I do not approve of your message. "You're" a bit smug (arrogant) with your "Ur welcome"!@@six1nyne

[@fredsilvers1427]

Just imagine the fire that will be this time.

[@saturn722]

Is KZbin messing with your view counts? These videos are GOLD and I hope more people are willing to stop by for a bit of truth!

[@sidepot]

If you want truth you will need to keep looking. If you want lies...... keep watching!

[@darkeen42]

Golden lies

[@user-xm2iv2zi8x]

Its now march 2024. I just discovered your Is Genesis History series. Outstanding is what comes to mind. I am utterly amazed . thanks

[@IsGenesisHistory]

Hello @user-xm2iv2zi8x! Glad you found us!

[@workaholic5318]

If the time span the evolutionists was in existence, the salt content of the seas would be as the dead sea. Instead it is more in line with a young earth. Being a closed system there is no place for salt to go but into solution with the water, then when the saturation point is reached then to the bottom of the sea. That does not comport with what exists.

[@vladimirstolov9324]

ok flat earther lol

[@daboffey]

@@vladimirstolov9324 Ad hominem attacks don’t count as refutations.

[@Keesha_Hardy]

@@vladimirstolov9324 There are plenty of creationists who do not believe that the earth is flat. Stop it.

[@vladimirstolov9324]

@@Keesha_Hardy it's the same idea though....ignore all evidence to believe in total nonsense

[@vladimirstolov9324]

@@daboffey oooh look who knows the fancy latin....im all tingly inside now

[@kbrown611]

Thank you, gentlemen, for another great presentation.

[@darkeen42]

Well presented lies

[@freemind..]

@@darkeen42 - You are here to defend the lies. You're oblivious to it for now..

[@skyrider7527]

Now is the time to make a video for us to see on how the layers were created, the process. Put your theories on the screen. You say this, now show us the flood.

[@gregwright5926]

I have a photo of a geological feature from southern Utah which shows a very large circular hole in the sandstone. It is excellent evidence for the global flood you often speak of. It simply could not be a feature carved out over millions of years. It had to be done quickly, when the sediment was soft and formed from very deep and fast moving water. I can send you the photo if you want and also let you know where it is.

[@donchilders226]

How did all the dinosaur tracks and human tracks together get on the Colorado Plato? There is a massive petrified flotation device in AZ about 340 square miles of it.

[@donchilders226]

@@patldennis DOOMED survivors genesis flood if there was a world flood than a world would try to survive it.

[@Lastprophetpeacebeuponme]

What flotation device are you talking about? Please explain I’m interested now.

[@stephenolan5539]

Is that the one that a guy confessed to faking? Or the indistinct ones that kinda sorta look like human footprints. And also look like theropod prints?

[@donchilders226]

@@Lastprophetpeacebeuponme the petrified forest. If you look at the Indian ocean tsunami and the tsunami in Japan you see people animals riding the debris pile so grabbing onto the first thing that floats would be the thing to do. About day 41 of the flood what is now the Colorado Plato rose and things were able to get off the debris pile that's why you can follow there track's right too the petrified remains. Some of the petrified wood have colonies of petrified insects on top of the wood it was flooting. Some of the most complete dinosaur remains petrified that is are at the petrified forest in AZ. I hope this brief explanation helps. The book of remembrance DOOMED survivors genesis flood if there was a world flood than a world would try to survive it.

[@Lastprophetpeacebeuponme]

@@donchilders226 thanks I’m gonna look more into it.

[@leostokes]

If water covered all of the earth would that imply the following? The water would be in uneven motion due to the tides. This motion would stir up sediments. These sediments would be deposited in low areas time after time forming layers as the tide recedes and the flood abates over a period of months, leaving behind layering like we see in the Grand Canyon.

[@nathanspark4876]

no friend, because animals inside would be mixed and not LAYERED ACCORDING with evolution. U'd find old and younger animal together which actually is not. Great flood never happened

[@freemind..]

@@nathanspark4876 - The Flood did happen around 4400 years ago. The water was miles deep which means it was global.

[@nomadhoss4827]

If the water was miles deep globally, where did all the water go?

[@lahaina4791]

​@@nomadhoss4827You know about oceans, right?

[@brunobastos5533]

@@freemind.. zero evidence of a flood where i live , how you deal with that

[@jerrylawrencedrums8224]

Sounds like the great breakup of "Pangaea" happened a lot faster than science anticipated.

[@marcusmuse4787]

the great fountains of the earth burst forth that sounds like it would affect plate tectonic movement and the breakup of pangaea.

[@TrevoltIV]

@@marcusmuse4787 Technically the great fountains of the deep are still going, they just slowed down significantly.

[@tfk0527]

@jerrylawrencedrums8224, And you make that assertion based on … what evidence??

[@matthewstokes1608]

@@tfk0527 this film is good evidence - as good as any other I've heard.

[@brunobastos5533]

@@matthewstokes1608 no is not

[@jasonkandahq1003]

they tried to dispute the hittites evidence was found. they tried to dispute david evidence was found. they tried to dispute jesus being fictional evidence goes against it. its hard for atheist to dispute the historical accuracy of the bible thus theyre reason for trying to attack its scientific aspect whichdoes not make sense especially if theyre attacking miracles. if Gods the reason for all existence i dont see why it would be hard for him to do things that go against the laws of physics and science etc. Praise GOD

[@marcusmuse4787]

especially if he created the laws of physics.

[@brunobastos5533]

@@marcusmuse4787 whom created him, you know the famous watch must have a watchmaker you throw at evolution

[@brunobastos5533]

Harry Potter site real place in England and London . so it must be true

[@brunobastos5533]

the bible also say Lot daughters fucked him . but i know that wasn't a sin back then how convenient

[@jasonkandahq1003]

@@brunobastos5533 have you not watched it? Duhhh

[@vikingskuld]

Really great video. I really appreciate you guys taking the time to show all the evidence. Thank you and keep up the good work.

[@djsarg7451]

Answers in Genesis problem is in the age of Earth. Genesis was written in Hebrew (small vocabulary), not English. The word "day" in Hebrew is "yom". This can be 24 hours, but in Genesis it is a long time span, as Hebrew has no word for epoch. We use "day" the same today. "In my grandfather's day, cars did not go fast". My grandfather did not live for 24 hours. The Earth is 4.543 billion years, this is in the timeline of Genesis when using the correct understanding of Hebrew and yom.

[@PR1NC345]

Old earth creationist

[@frankcasey7423]

Super interesting! I love these videos. They really get you thinking about a lot things that were possible that you didn’t think of before. Thank you! Awesome work!!

[@darkeen42]

Not possible just fiction

[@PS-du3mn]

@@darkeen42 you saying fiction is fictitious. The truth slaps you in the face like a big ole smelly fish, yet you continue to return to the pile of vomit which will never prove right except to deny you the truth of Gods grace.

[@user-hw3cl5hu2l]

I'm from Arizona, and I appreciate this video! As a Christian, I know and believe in creation. May God bless you and those who hear this video.🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@lindaellison899]

the little magnet shifts its axis to line up with the big magnet when it (He) returns from His long journey, and no one knows the day or hour when it happens.

[@wlhgmk]

I think this one of the most extreme cases of cognitive dissonance have seen. I'm surprised it doesn't cause a geologist to go mad.

[@tightlines106]

History will repeat it's self

[@johnsheaman8057]

No,I read somewhere it's the lake of fire next. Probably Yosemite.

[@tightlines106]

@@johnsheaman8057 probably right my friend peace

[@vivliforia2262]

Some people say: man repeats history

[@izziebon]

God promised not to flood the world again; see Genesis!

[@LV4EVR]

So ... there's a lot of arguing in the comments below. IMHO, there are primarily atheists who require millions/billions of years and equal numbers of zero-possibility, random chance events to produce anything resembling order, and God-believing Christian creationists whose God can literally, instantly speak the universe into existence. I won't join in the debate, as it's utterly futile; neither side is, at this point, open to the other. You may, however, correctly deduce that I'm firmly in the second, God-believing side. One thing is beyond debate, though. One day, the God-believing folks and the atheist folks are all going to depart this life. At that time, the Christian and the atheist will have the issue settled, forever. If the atheist were right, the Christian would be in for a forever nap. If the Christian were right (they are), the atheist would be in for forever misery. All have sinned. All need a savior. Repent and trust in Jesus' sacrifice for your sins. You'll never make it on your own. The days are short. And getting shorter.

[@billyb7465]

Isn’t this just Pascal’s wager? It’s not a binary choice; for instance, what if the Muslim is right? Or some follower of any other religion that has ever existed throughout human history.

[@SuperPhester]

THANK YOU Dr Austin and IGH for your Great FAITH!!!

[@moss17dale]

Genesis 7:20 “Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.” So the flood was just over 8 metres deep

[@IsGenesisHistory]

@moss17dale The floodwaters prevailed about 15 cubits over the tops of the tallest mountains of that time. If the total depth of the floodwaters was just 15 cubits deep, it would not have killed all humans and other animals that were not on the Ark (especially the flying varieties) (Genesis 7:21). Given that the Ark was 30 cubits high, a flood with a depth of just 15 cubits would not have been deep enough for the Ark to float (Genesis 7:18). The dove would have no difficulty finding a place to land once Noah released it from the Ark (Genesis 8:9). And finally, the floodwaters took many months to recede from the earth's surface. If the flood were only 15 cubits deep, there is no reason it would have taken that long. The most explanatory interpretation of the Flood narrative in Genesis 6-9 is that it describes a worldwide Flood that covered the tallest pre-Flood mountains by 15 cubits of water.

[@ozowen]

@@IsGenesisHistory And the water inn the mud would necessarily have taken millions of years to be removed. Drainage and compaction processes would force the entire extant surface to be incredibly deep a fluid mud for centuries.

[@moss17dale]

@@IsGenesisHistory Thank you for your response.

[@randyjones3869]

Last conversation about how Mt Everest at 29,000 feet could have been covered with water and the reasoning was “the landscape was vastly different then”. But now the landscape of the bottom of the Grand Canyon shows evidence? Pick a side.

[@dr.johnbrunn1550]

I chose both. Mt. Everest wasn't 29,000 feet then and is loaded with marine fossils. The grand canyon is evidence of massive runoff, unless God protected it intact for millions of years. A single catastrophic event could easily have created both mountains and canyons.

[@randyjones3869]

@@dr.johnbrunn1550 what was the highest peak at the time of the flood, and what was that height? If Everest wasn’t 29,000 feet, how high was it? Wouldn’t shifting tectonic plates of the continents also account for seas becoming mountains, and massive water shifts?

[@izziebon]

@@dr.johnbrunn1550 The Nevada (desert) State emblem is a whale because so many of them are found there underground from what must’ve been part of a global ocean.

[@dr.johnbrunn1550]

@@randyjones3869 (I believe) the shifting tectonic plates are the leftover movement from the cataclysmic event which caused the flood. The movement of tectonic plates currently seen is probably too small to raise a mountain like Everest, because that requires too much momentum (possible in the case of a very sudden shift of continents). There are many related videos on this channel that explain these forces. The reason for marine fossils on Everest is that they were rapidly formed. Marine fossils don't routinely form on the bottom of the oceans- they aren't buried rapidly enough. There are no skeletons around the Titanic to be discovered in the future.

[@dr.johnbrunn1550]

@@izziebon For me, that's even more evidence of a global flood. Fossils don't form easily at the bottom of the ocean. Even small creatures need to be buried quickly in order to be preserved. A much larger flood would be necessary to preserve a whale.

[@jaybee7890]

You can back into any conclusion you want if you start with the answer. No matter how glossy the production or how much conviction and calm you use, it all breaks down under scientific scrutiny. There is enough here to keep a follower engaged but to me that is the sad part. The Grand Canyon has nothing to do with Noah’s great flood.

[@m0x910]

The Grand Canyon is one in a long line of evidence of Noah’s flood. Science is just playing catch up as it always has to the truth: God’s Word. We have witnessed the scientific theory shift from “millions of years of deposition” as a cause for the geologic column, to “millions of years of multiple catastrophic deluges”.

[@ozowen]

@@m0x910 No, the Grand Canyon is just a favourite icon in the YEC quiver because most YEC is in the USA and they need an explanation for their fave geological site. In fact it doesn't help at all.

[@m0x910]

@@ozowen Yes because diversity of thought never helped anybody. We must all think and believe the same things.

[@ozowen]

@@m0x910 Certainly YEC demands compliance of thought. Science demands contestation and doubt. However, once the challenges have been exhausted, we end up where the evidence inevitably requires.

[@7inrain]

@@m0x910 _"The Grand Canyon is one in a long line of evidence of Noah’s flood."_ Quite the opposite. People like Austin, Snelling or Whitmore have to invent the most outrageous scenarios to be able to stuff the deposition of 28 different geological layers with a total thickness of more than mile into one year of an alleged flood. Every real geologist is laughing them in their face for their idiotic brainfarts.

[@jerryg3524]

an interesting hypothesis, but not entirely convincing; for starters just imagine poor Noah trying to fit pairs of dinosaurs into his ark

[@jenniferdeiner8637]

Baby dinosaurs

[@jerryg3524]

@@jenniferdeiner8637 😂 maybe

[@SamuelMartinez-sq7ei]

As many species instinctively migrate to a set point at a set time, God may have triggered that in one moment for all species, thus choosing how to fit them all in (e.g. minimizing full grown animals)....just my thoughts😊

[@marcusmuse4787]

juvenile dinosaurs could fit. and why didnt the carnovores eat the others? its says in the bible that originally we were all herbivores and didnt become omnivores until after the flood.

[@geenogee]

Creationists should consider if the Colorado Plateau was uplifted at about the same time as mountains were uplifted after the Flood. The metasedimentary Vishnu Schist and the granite dikes in the basement rocks suggest that worldwide metamorphism happened during this catastrophic uplift. The granite dikes were likely injected as magma into the Vishnu Schist during metamorphism. The magma slowly cooled to form the granite. The rapid evaporation of water in groundwater, lakes, rivers, and oceans would have catastrophically flooded the earth from ongoing rainfall. These floodwaters would have all been flowing downhill in very hot geological features and would have easily eroded river channels and valleys. Such an event would have caused mass extinctions of plants and animals around the world. Geological extension of the earth’s crust at this time would have formed large igneous provinces around the world that some associate with mass extinctions. This may have been triggered by worldwide asteroid impacts that some also associate with mass extinctions. Some say most of the fossilized plants and animals are extinct.

[@rougebaba3887]

There is a cliff face in which a rather square boulder is imbedded, set on one corner with another corner jutting up into the strata above. What is interesting is that the strata below the boulder is distorted, as if the boulder landed in soft ground and pushed down into it while those above are relatively the same thicknesses as those on either side. If these strata were laid down very slowly over this boulder, the strata would just climb up, pretty much ending at the boulder's surface. Any stuff laid slowly on top would also slowly suffer erosion. The slowly climbing strata would eventually cover it. But these strata layers run over the boulder like blankets being laid over a hard object, running one after another right over it, retaining much the same thickness as the surrounding layers. The only way to explain such a picture is for there to be either one massive flood where sediments settled very quickly one after the other, or numerous but more localized large scale floods that laid these down in successive order. Considering the uniformity that exist in the strata as a whole, a single massive flood makes more sense of the picture of this imbedded boulder.

[@trevspark]

It would of been nice to see the part of the strata being talked of

[@izziebon]

You were seeing it throughout most of the video.

[@deepSouthTexasPrepper]

It is extremely interesting to me that the question is always, where did the water go? Recently it was discovered the massive amount of water in the earth's deep rocks. Scientists explain it as great oceans under the ground ... when its actually water inside of rocks...but kinda explains where the water might have gone

[@nomadhoss4827]

I suppose there must have been no ground water before the flood. That means it never rain before the great flood. That’s got to be it!

[@jujuyuchi6736]

Might I enquire as to your thoughts on, say the deposits upon the canyons of I80 Utah and I70 Colorado? Interesting strata laid down by....?

[@SchitzNGigglez]

I was hiking the I-70 road cut today. It's like walking through time... I would love to see it all laid down. I may have walked home with a few fossils too.

[@Doty6String]

Where did all the water go?

[@rickzabala6020]

How noisy do think it was for Noah during the global flood?

[@beestoe993]

There is a video called "In depth explanation of what caused Noah's flood" By Dr. Kurt wise. After watching that and listening to Dr. Wise describe subduction and the mega earthquakes that happened I think that life during the flood would have been utterly horrifying. Good thing they had faith in God.

[@sidepot]

Whatever he imagined in his delusional mind.

[@justintyme2764]

No we can’t see evidence of Noah’s flood. But you can see evidence of the destruction/flood that took place at the Katabole (satan’s casting down i.e. overthrow. God’s destruction of the first earth and Heaven age). Noah’s flood was a peaceful walk-in-the- park compared to the Katabole.

[@rickzabala6020]

@@beestoe993 I'll check it out more sometime, it's long.

[@rickzabala6020]

@@sidepot At least it seems you think he was a real person. For me, for all the writing he did, he was brilliant. But he did like his wine. Maybe he had a little PTSD for all the Noise & shaking. You are his descendant.

[@wirelessone2986]

Is there evidence at the bottom of the great lakes?

[@TheDeadbirdy]

I think going to the Grand Canyon is much easier

[@wirelessone2986]

@@TheDeadbirdy Did you read the write up on this guy?It sounds like around the world in 80 days...traveling every where with every travel mode tracking creation/flood.Its in the drop downs under the title...so with that in mind...he now needs to travel (or he already has) to the great lakes...I've heard about trees at great depths sitting on the bottom upright in superior..

[@jaimemartinez3866]

@@velkyn1 explain how different cultures around the world speak of the earth being flooded??? ooooh i know what you will say, it is coincident. yeah right.

[@daboffey]

@@velkyn1 And funny how there actually is a consensus on the date of the flood. God has revealed enough information in His Word for us to calculate it.

[@jaimemartinez3866]

@@velkyn1 the cultures are not saying the banks flooded a few feet inland.

[@duffysullivan2794]

I have a question. If Noah's flood was a global event and the whole earth was covered in water deep enough to cover the mountains, where did all that water recede to?

[@six1nyne]

Genisis 1:2 maybe that has somthing to do with where it all went.

[@duffysullivan2794]

The chapter to read is Genesis 8. That goes into detail about the flood waters receding. Says there was a wind that moved the water and the rain stopped and the fountains of the deep were stopped. The fountains of the deep must have produced a lot of the flood water. No way rain could produce enough to cover mountains. But the problem remains, if water covered the whole earth, all land being deep under flood water, where did the water subside to? The whole earth was one big ocean, if it was all under water.

[@wolfbbq6076]

If you believe in the sky wizzard and his magic baby then its easy to buy this nonsense .

[@vivliforia2262]

@@duffysullivan2794 wind blows from cold places to hot places. The great cold wind could have been moving from the poles, freezing (not all) the water, creating the Arctic and Antarctic regions. Moreover, the ark could be floating almost near the troposphere where the higher you get to the troposphere, the lower the temperature gets. The water quantity decreased as it was freezing. Besides, earth mantle could save much much water from the surface. Sorry for my English. That's from my perspective.

[@vivliforia2262]

@@wolfbbq6076 troll 😒

[@marceasusanna7749]

So what is different about the Pacific Northwest on that map? You just showed showed three or four different layers of Earth and then in the Pacific Northwest it's totally different. Why is that?

[@Teacher2Polis2XtraRice]

I really want to visit this place.🤩

[@TheSharperSword]

Ive watched this at least 10 if not 20 times....

[@user-ue3lu5ze5w]

Caused the dry land to appear Genesis 1:9 This is the first great water related event in the creation of the world. Most people don’t recognize this event and how large it would have been. They only refer to Noah’s flood when this one likely was far greater. God caused mountains and hills to raise up out of the waters causing great floods that shaped the land, washing a continents worth of water over and off the land giving it shape. The second event was Noah’s flood this again shaped the land, but potentially in a less dramatic way. As the lands weren’t being push by tectonic plate movements with great earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanoes that would accompany such an event. Literally entire mountain ranges being raised up through the waters and the layers of soft wet ocean floors. It would have been awesome to behold. 9 ​​¶ ​And God said, Let the ​​​waters​ under the heaven be gathered together unto ​​​one​ place, and let the dry ​land​ appear: and it was so.

[@James-ke5sx]

Impossible. The ocean was the same level as the water on the land. Therefore there would not have been a water flow. Also where did all the dirt go. If there was a rapid flow then there would have been 300 miles worth of dirt 2 mi deep and 20 mi across piled up somewhere at the end of the river. So where is 300 miles worth of dirt.

[@marschlosser4540]

I have a copy, but still come here to see it! In Jusus' Name, I bind all the Body's enemies at the feet of Lord Jesus and break all bonds they have. Lord, fill them with your Holy Spirit. Open their eyes to You. Open their ears and souls to You in all ways. Amen.

[@James-ke5sx]

Noah's Ark was copied from the fictional poem called The Epic of Gilgamesh written 4000 years ago. Plus we are in Ice Age and you cannot have a real life flood in a nice age when everything that got buried in the snow in Northern Canada is still sitting there after millions of years.

[@mikeprice4103]

Never did say how fast the flow is, I was hoping.

[@tonyjesshope6861]

What’s the age of the Tapeat sandstone?

[@loriannbendit6296]

I’m expected to believe in a Big Bang but not a 6 day creation.

[@ereynatetasgrafas9933]

Why not?

[@vladimirstolov9324]

we're not asking you to believe anything dingus....just to examine the evidence objectively...you won't though.......because science is too hard, takes too much time to understand...and ancient stories are easy

[@jaimemartinez3866]

@@ereynatetasgrafas9933 what for??

[@sebcollexts6889]

@@velkyn1 An explosion or (big bang) destroys life, it doesn't create it. Blow something up and let me see you make it perfect and beautiful again. Don't bother, it can't be done.

[@daboffey]

@@velkyn1 The only evidence for the Big Bang is in the evolutionists’ minds. It has all been debunked.

[@User0809205]

Why doesn't it ever occur to geologists to just look at the stuff they're talking about? Is Genesis History? (like Answers in Genesis) is constantly catching scientists who miss world-changing evidence because they simply don't look at the rocks they're studying. "The conventional paradigm says such and such, but if you really look at the rocks, they're obviously 6,000 years old and were formed by angels dancing on them or whatever."

[@sds_80]

Great thinking on the science and mechanics of what we really observe. Thanks!

[@jamespayne8781]

Take a quart jar, put in about a pint of soil, fill about an inch from the top with water and shake vigorously. Then set it down and leave it for several hours or even a day. Gravity will classify the soil with heavier particles on the bottom, lighter layers in higher layers. Organics will be on the top.

[@mobiusm7440]

Where did all the water come from? Where was it flowing from/to?

[@berns4146]

The book of Enoch states that the firmament was torn letting the waters from above the firmament come pouring into the earth below.

[@izziebon]

The first six chapters of Genesis explain it; there was a huge water canopy around the whole globe which made all the temperatures more temperate than we have now, also some water came up from underground.

[@marcusmuse4787]

the fountains of the deep burst forth so underground waters and if you read the genesis account it says God created a wind to blow over the waters this would force the water to go back into the earth and thats why we have oil and scientist did discover water 400 miles deep thats 3 times the amount on the surface. and it came from the surface,

[@starchild2121]

Are you guys going to make a Spanish translation?

[@MichaelJohnson-jt5cu]

A fast moving pole shift along with a fast moving crustal shift would produce the energy needed to produce a global flood that could scour the surface of the planet and create the mud flows and movement of debris flows across the continents. The only other possibility would be a major meteor impact into the ice caps melting the ice causing a fast imbalance of the planet potentially creating a crustal shift and or pole shift causing global flooding. A large object in space traveling too close to earths orbit could also cause a polar shift and crustal shift

[@insanedrummer89]

Two guys talking to a rock. nice!

[@beestoe993]

Your insight is profound. :D

[@izziebon]

Rock on!

[@James-ke5sx]

Impossible. The water in the ocean was the same level as the water on the Earth therefore the water on the Earth would not flow into the ocean.

[@j.whisper2379]

No we can't!

[@ohitsustu1835]

If you shake a jar of water and mud, it settles in layers just like the flood.

[@GiselleMAguiar]

What about the Painted Desert & Petrified Forest in Eastern AZ?

[@saturn722]

God never intended man to know everything about everything. There is more than enough evidence in the natural world for us to understand that creation didn’t happen by chance. The question is are we going to believe our own senses and common sense or listen to man’s alternate theories?

[@danielreynolds1632]

@@saturn722 Everything you said makes no sense at all…

[@idahoduckhunter]

Interesting question. Well the petrified wood would have to be buried in some catastrophic event to not rot away. The question to me would be was it part of the 1 year flood initial catastrophic flood that laid all the layers described in this video OR was it part of the second hand flooding as the waters receded, leaving giant lakes (like the one that drained to create the grand canyon) that that event buried the trees so they could mineralize. My guess is the tree were part of a raft of trees that ended up being covered by mud rapidly during the initial flood. Buried in mud the mineralization took place to petrify it. Then later after the flood waters receded and as local lakes began to drain (some catastrophically) it stripped away flood layers to reveal these petrified trees.

[@davepeters8902]

Still don't want to understand what you are looking at? When you're ready, I'll explain it to you.

[@mach1gtx150]

I read a fantastic well researched book called 'Cataclysm!' by DS Allan and JB Delair, which talks in sobering detail about this almost Earth-ending event about 11600 years ago. They theorize a planetoid size object with other huge objects in tow, came from deep space and passed by other planets, causing unimaginable damage to them, then passing BETWEEN the Moon and the Earth. The forces in play include massive crustal movements, creation of high mountains ranges, a possible pole shift, massive volcanic activity, a blackening of the sky with soot/dirt/smoke, etc and massive height tsunamis; which just about destroyed all human life and all flora and fauna. This is why we found instantaneous extinction of mammals like mastadons, saber tooth tigers, etc. on the American continent. Cultures from all over the world relate various stories about this event.

[@dynamo6796]

All these massive "meteor" craters all over the world, are really te fountains of the deep.

[@tfk0527]

I’ll make this concise. _”Do we see evidence of Noah’s Flood in the Grand Canyon (or anywhere else in the world)?”_ No.

[@m0x910]

Your interpretation is outdated and misinformed. The world if full of evidence, you are too wilfully blind or close minded to interpret it accurately.

[@tfk0527]

@@m0x910 feel free to provide your BEST “evidence”.

[@m0x910]

I will make this concise: Jellyfish fossils.

[@ozowen]

@@m0x910 Wow! So convincing. I guess there are no actual scientific explanations for jellyfish fossils then? Oh wait.

[@tfk0527]

@@m0x910 _”jellyfish fossils”_ ?? Too concise. I have zero idea what you are writing about.

[@cskinner6564]

If the moisture in the dirt is disturbed it will create the man made mud flow.

[@dlove118]

This is why we don't have to worry about climate change because as the seas raise the extra weight will mil the granite on the ocean floor and we will be fine

[@herozero5555]

Great bedtime stories, indeed!👍

[@realtruth172]

what i believe ties into what this man says that some granular material came all the way from the great lakes . i say the original plunge of flood water hit the great lakes first and thats when our wobble of our planet started and the volume after 40 days made our planet larger perhaps 35% bigger and increased our gravity . the water came from outer space . now possibly borrowed from mars . this is also ties in with the rounded rocks in the kettle moraine in wisconsin . no glacier made them round. a turbulent action of water from the initial plunge at the great lakes did that if a glacier made these rocks round they would be all over our state . thats why the shore line of east south america matches up to the west shore of africa the the planet got larger in volume they and they split apart . the exact percentage of size the planet got is debatable but its very obvious the lord brought the water from outer space .

[@trackinggod8087]

Stunning! Thanks so much.

[@georgeengland1699]

Love it!

[@zimberticagames5291]

Doug Vogt from the Diehold Foundation makes the claim that the Flood was a geomagnetic reversal. Lots of informative videos. I recommend.

[@David-zc6wq]

According to Lord of the Ring, that extinction event happened in the middle age. Do any of you understand radiometeric dating, stratus layers? No? Well, lets rely on stories and fables. Frodo Lives!

[@eugeneprewittforieat5073]

I understand radiometric dating and sediments. Using long half lifes to measure short ages causes some problems related to precision and scatter. The nature of how a magma melt ages may be sufficient to explain much of the apparent discrepancies between radiometric dating and rates of erosion and sediment accumulation.

[@jimmydickson8854]

It’s all sediment from a world flood no traces of animal or vegetation all sediment

[@IPoopOnYouEveryLastOneOfYou]

Heard this guy likes beer, stone cold at 3:16.

[@kevinrussell1144]

The good doc claims the Great Unconformity represents a catastrophic event over a VERY short time period. He knows, however, what science tells him about WHERE granite forms. It does not form at the earth's surface, but miles underground where it cools and crystallizes slowly. Coarse crystals equal slow cooling AT depth; fine grained volcanic rock implies the lava cooled quickly near the surface. An erosional surface cut into granite implies that an extended period of uplift and erosion occurred AFTER the granite formed. The Tapeats Sandstone resting on top of granite, above an erosional surface, means that AFTER and erosion, the region was down-dropped so that a shallow marine environment was imposed. What this event records, according to non-YEC geologists, is the rifting and breakup of the ancestral continent now known as Rodinia. This happened, according to these same scientists, between 750 and ~600 million years ago. That's what the geologic evidence says. You can choose to believe or not, as you please.

[@ozowen]

No

[@jfjusa1]

maybe, as the earth was a molten ball of rock - great splits would occur in the upper layers. sort of like tearing that you see see in molten metals as they are being formed. that would be one way the grand canyon could form without a "great flood", wouldn't it? those layers were once molten and they appear to be separate because of the time between them and the amount of minerals/deposits and so forth in them. the earth spent a long long time as a molten ball of rock - and that's what has caused all the layers in the rocks. years of deposits, then cooling, then more deposits, more cooling and so on.... water did not form those layers of rock - no way.

[@melvincastillo2496]

Poor Atheists 😭

[@sidepot]

Awwwe, you just keep on telling yourself that. Your delusional mind needs to be fed continuously.

[@darkeen42]

We're perfectly fine living in the real world accepting reality for what it is. We pity you people that have to believe in some magic fairy tail after you died to get through life. Life is what you see and no more make the most of it don't waste it expecting something that's never going to come after you die

[@darkeen42]

@@sidepot how much violence and hate has the need to believe in the magic fairy tales created in the world? Here's a hint the worst of it the Holocaust the Crusades the Spanish Inquisition Witch Trials all because you people can't accept reality

[@melvincastillo2496]

@@darkeen42 the magic is an explosion of nothingness , caused by nothing created everything. Now that's magic. Doesn't even qualify as science. Yet here you are

[@melvincastillo2496]

@@darkeen42 now you also say dont expect anything after you die. Which sounds like you would know as if you died. Keep the comedy coming.

[@literallyjen]

The bible is technically a history book. Blows my mind how people worship it though. That's wrong.

[@jimwright3566]

A question and a comment. I’ll concede the 40 days and 40 nights of rain is on the edges of possibility. But where did the water go? It drained where? And when it drained, it would have done so rapidly, carrying huge numbers of rocks and boulders, to carve the Grand Canyon. Water itself isn’t going to do it. They talk of the sedimentary layers being formed from bedrock, but with a rapid current almost all of the sediment is being carried downstream. Rivers carry material in suspension, which means heavier particles fall out first. They make a point of that at the Great Unconformity. The formation above the granite bedrock should be boulders or cobblestone or at least gravel. Where are the big rocks?

[@rickvenlo1362]

777. 🌞

[@albertcrawler409]

Not true, Noah's boat is also in the stars. The Bible is not a religious book, but a cosmological and psychological book. The Old Testament contains many Eastern allegories and the New Testament was written by the Greek writers in their symbolic language, so that we cannot read the Bible literally. See my collected KZbin playlist about the beautiful Bible.

[@bentleyfatheree1616]

How long did Adam & Eve live before they sinned

[@jameshale6401]

It dont say how long adam was alone before eve was made But the fact GOD said be fruitful and multiply and they didnt have kids until after they sinned It must have been maybe less then 9 months Possible she could have been pregnant while she sinned and maybe thats why the bible says we are born unto into sin Now if eve would have had kids and grandkids before she sinned i would think all of them would have had to eat the fruit on their own And why didnt they kill the tree after they ate it maybe GOD would not let them

[@kevinrussell1144]

Claiming the Tapeats is a chaotic flood deposit, analogous to a mudflow is just wrong. We can see, today, where sand accumulates. Fairly clean sand forms on beaches, in river channels, and in dunes, and the energy of the system and the kinds of material being carried by the wind or water depends on what material is available to be eroded, and how fast the medium is moving (which relate to relief, elevation, and climate). A thick sandstone layer, exhibiting thousands of individual bedding layers, means the environment was fairly uniform over an extended period of time.

[@neohippe1]

Sweeeet! Time for bedtime stories!!!

[@ncinteriorsplus3520]

Historic deadly heatwave and these guys are wearing long sleeves and not a drop of sweat. Hmmmm....

[@billswing1445]

It rained for 40 days and 40 nights it is not possible that that could have happened in 40 days and 40 nights so your calculations are 100% wrong

[@johnhess3886]

According to the bible, Noah's flood lasted for a year, not 40 days. Most of the water came from the breakup of "the fountains of the great deep", not from the rain.

[@user-lm7rs4jv7g]

Seriously? The youngest rocks in Grand Canyon date to 200 million years old. The sedimentary layers below range down to 1.2 billion years, then there is a missing level of sediment, and then the age of the rocks drops down to 1.6 billion years.

[@paulomachado5124]

Espero o vídeo traduzido. Aguardo ansioso.

[@andrewludlam2565]

Er NO

[@connielipp8648]

Wonderful!.. Thank you for sharing..

[@allyshivers3082]

Of course you can it was all over the world its what happened to the dinosaurs Noah's flood God is just that awsome

[@nomadhoss4827]

After the entire world was under water and then it wasn’t, where’d all the water go?

[@urasam2]

Hi! If you haven’t watched the video yet, let me save you some time. The answer to the question “can we see evidence of Noah’s flood at the Grand Canyon?” is “No”.

[@daboffey]

If you believe that the Great Unconformity is not evidence of Noah’s flood, would it not be better to suggest that we do look at this video to see how weak the evidence is?

[@Keesha_Hardy]

@@daboffey Exactly. Some people are closed minded when it comes to this. They’ve been taught all their life that the Grand Canyon formed over millions of years by erosion, and they never question it. They only question those who don’t just fall in line with what we’re told in school.

[@alanthompson8515]

@@Keesha_Hardy Well on this line of "reasoning" I suppose you spell vurds howefer yew wanto and 2+2=5 and a bit. Get real. What we were told in school was there for good reason. Mainly coz it was correct. Dozens, nay, hundreds of dedicated professionals (none of whom had any hidden agenda, unlike IGH?) have toiled over more than a century to provide a rational explanation of the observed facts re: the Grand Canyon area. This can be summarised in a few short paragraphs (please ask). However, simply because this account involves a few more years than IGH? and (I guess) you can accept, it is somehow the scientists who are "close minded" and not you? No. The account has changed and will no doubt change in detail again as new and more accurate information is added. That is science NOT being "close minded". You however HAVE to have a closed mind. You have to protect your dogmas - young earth and the presupposition that God Did It. SMH.

[@urasam2]

@@daboffey It doesn’t take much effort to research the great unconformity and reach an understanding of the science. So no, I don’t think there is any merit in spending time watching a video that is pseudoscience and mumbo jumbo.

[@urasam2]

@@Keesha_Hardy I agree that you should never blindly accept what you’re told but the fact is that when you bother to look into the research and data behind the great in conformity you see that it is perfectly well explained by actual science.

[@LuisHumbertoNunez]

watch this get ignored, This is only prof of god of the gaps. You point at an unknown part of history and say God. The great unconformity is far too old to be the biblical flood. I suppose you will just ignore that part.

[@seanbenz8277]

I saw evidence of flood in madang png