Canon RF 600mm and RF 800mm lenses inital impressions

[@Luna-cf3op]

Very good review. Your sample images speaks more than tens of other reviews I saw on KZbin. Most reviews covered the lenses with the R5 or R6. I'm very surprised to see the quality you got out of the RP. Thank you.

[@JayCatterson]

Thanks for using the RP for your tests! Those pictures look great! Can’t wait to throw down the cash for the 600mm!

[@Mmmjakis]

How did you feel about the 800mm having one less stop is IS? Was it noticeable?

[@p_adam19]

It's important to mention that these lenses do *not* support combined image stabilisation with the R6 and R5, only 5 or 4 stops of lens IS in the case of the 600mm or 800mm So they feel right at home on the cheaper R and RP bodies.

[@HeroShotz]

Thanks you someone finally put the 600 on the rp lol thats what im gonna use with this lens

[@WestVirginiaWildlife]

your voice is like an animated character lol sounds cool

[@PhotoBob]

I’m trying to figure out who these are for. F/11 and non weather sealed rules out wildlife and sports. The price and being a prime rules out soccer moms and casual photographers. I don’t get it.

[@kikipratama1]

To be fair, 600mm and 800mm are destined to be huge. These F11s are just options, especially for starters. Seems like a waste for many, but I believe most people have never touched a real, super expensive yet enormous super-tele primes. Weather sealing is a bit gimmicky for those who use this kind of lens regularly; They still use covers. That said, those lenses are not for me.

[@DrummingTmate]

The ISO in bright light is ridiculous and means you can't crop into the photos as there is no detail there.These lenses are a waste of money.

[@Yupthereitism]

No color with these lenses, pretty disappointing