In my opinion Mads Mikkelson is one of the greatest villain actors of all time.
@Bobba85904 жыл бұрын
Mikkelsen
@brianmaiden11854 жыл бұрын
*_MM33 Code Alert_*
@sophiecooper36244 жыл бұрын
Love Mads He's my favorite Hannibal Lecter and he was great in Casino Royale
@StewyAdamRules4 жыл бұрын
He’s great and this movie is awesome.
@antonk63599 жыл бұрын
1953 to now - AND THE SAME QUEEN ALL ALONG
@PongoXBongo8 жыл бұрын
+Anton K In the books, the movies, and real life! God save the Queen. ;)
@homelesshannah508 жыл бұрын
that's because that woman will never die! I suspect she is a freaking alien.
@AFreakingAxeCH8 жыл бұрын
+Lavern Merriweather oh god here we go again.....
@Dicedude8 жыл бұрын
Yep. She has reigned longer than any other British monarch.
@6424minatrea7 жыл бұрын
Solid Snake I hope prince Charles croaks first. William will be a good king
@lexman71799 жыл бұрын
Apparently Flemming's wife actually was the one who got Flemming to sit down and finally write the book he was always talking about writing. When he had finished it he said that he was going to dedicate it to her but she read it and said "This isn't the kind of book you dedicate."
@cashwin453 жыл бұрын
Probably because of the misogyny lol
@warrenrhinerson63732 жыл бұрын
@@cashwin45remember the book takes place in 1951
@flyingcabbage35519 жыл бұрын
'In the book he had brown hair and eyes' I almost forgot that in the film he has no eyes
@jamesoblivion7 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@Dragonfly-00106 жыл бұрын
In the book he has black hair and blue-grey eyes
@theindestructible.4 жыл бұрын
No eyes?
@katemara6673 жыл бұрын
James Blind.
@bluebell21662 жыл бұрын
@@katemara667 😂😂😂
@PtrOBrn8 жыл бұрын
well... we now know why bond has no children after sleeping with all those women through the ages.
@WooZIE9978 жыл бұрын
OMG YES!!!!!!! sorry but this made my day man LOL!!!!!
@jazzx2517 жыл бұрын
Must correct you there - in the books, Kissy Suzuki (who is a sort of incredibly strong Japanese Amazon diving girl - like alot of her friends on a small Japanese island [a bit like Wonderwoman]) gets pregnant by Bond. You Only Live Twice was the book where he meets her.
@boxtank52886 жыл бұрын
@@jazzx251 Which lends creedence to the fan theory for The Rock...that being 'Mason is Connery's James Bond.'
@suelyfunes75606 жыл бұрын
Actually he had a son called James Suzuki. But he Was killed later in the books. (It happends on the books after felming's death.)
@Trev3594 жыл бұрын
@@suelyfunes7560 If it's not a Fleming book it isn't canon as far as I'm concerned.
@PaulineMontagna6 жыл бұрын
I knew Vesper was doomed from the moment Bond said 'I love you.'
@MohamedMostafa-qn6zk5 жыл бұрын
The author didn't keep the life of any girl Bond had fallen in love with. Vesper, then Tracy. A man like Bond radiates danger towards those around him (his enemies and loved ones), so he always lives alone.
@vetoland929 жыл бұрын
"Beat for beat. Ball squish for ball squish." Had me dying haha
@caseyredmon58139 жыл бұрын
We had ALOT of iterations of that line. Spent a good 10 minutes making them up and laughing at ourselves like children.
@CineFix9 жыл бұрын
+Casey Redmon GET BACK TO WORK, CASEY!
@caseyredmon58139 жыл бұрын
+CineFix yes, overlord.
@claytoncourtney13099 жыл бұрын
if I recall the book did not have the comments from Bond. in the book he kept thinking "in an hour i'll be deaf"
@janeyrevanescence129 жыл бұрын
+Casey Redmon oh to have been a fly on the wall while you guys were recording it.
@loudplanetlive50808 жыл бұрын
If memory serves, the gun in the book was pretty cool. It was disguised as a fancy-handled walking stick so the shooter could get close enough to Bond to shoot him in the back of the head.
@locutusdborg1265 жыл бұрын
Actually, the back of the spine, but otherwise you are correct.
@KageNoTora744 жыл бұрын
M: "Did you learn your lesson?" Bond: "No." Brutal honestly.
@alm21879 жыл бұрын
According to IMDb, On Her Majesty's Secret Service is the most faithful adaptation.
@rodrigosilva73115 жыл бұрын
Yes, because Ian Flemming met the spy that inspired Bond in Estoril
@thiagodunadan9 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how they managed to update the story to a most modern social view, while maintaining the character's essence.
@WilliamShulte8 жыл бұрын
Actually, in the Fleming novels, James Bond has blue eyes, just like Daniel Craig.
@jimamo27685 жыл бұрын
Main difference was his hair was black
@locutusdborg1265 жыл бұрын
Actually, gray.
@bloodtimemaximusfullthrott2265 жыл бұрын
Locutus D'Borg blue-gray. Directly refers to them like that
@locutusdborg1265 жыл бұрын
@@bloodtimemaximusfullthrott226 You are correct.
@elzerom73785 жыл бұрын
That's why Henry Cavill will be a good 007
@NoName-cu5jn9 жыл бұрын
they called the Aston Martin in the movie db5. the Aston Martin in the movie was an Aston Martin dbs v12
@TheGamerThing9 жыл бұрын
Noticed that
@riskybusiness95309 жыл бұрын
+Jai Kataria It was actually a db9 thanks
@Bruceybaby16v9 жыл бұрын
No, it really is a DBS V12. Thanks xxx
@riskybusiness95309 жыл бұрын
No you are absolutely right. My apologies.
@GiloTintin9 жыл бұрын
+Jai Kataria glad someone else noticed that... Further more the car in the book was not a Bentley Limousine but a Bentley Continental Mk II similar to those used by Bentley at Le Mans some years prior.
@santos84689 жыл бұрын
From what I remember of the book, the movie follows the basic story very well. The major difference is the inclusion of the two action sequences at the beginning and the one at the ending because nobody is going to watch a Bond movie that doesn't have any action in it.
@jac69959 жыл бұрын
+Blue Whovian Bond movies have become their own entities outside of the novels.
@gabbar51ngh3 жыл бұрын
@@jac6995 that's true. There's tonnes of comics of James bond with new storylines which has nothing to do with Ian Fleming's original character. James bond movies has broken out of literature and is pop-cultural icon now
@Gadget-Walkmen3 жыл бұрын
all bond stories are spy action thrillers so no duh.
@ninjaf00t9 жыл бұрын
"Awful Pierce Brosnan entries". What does that have to do with Goldeneye? Goldeneye was awesome.
@alexanderrot22709 жыл бұрын
+ninjaf00t Die another day and some others were not.Besides goldeneye they were so shitty that until today I did not watch them till the end or at least I can't remember what there was in the end cause they sucked for the biggest part^^
@TheImSolid9 жыл бұрын
+ninjaf00t yeah man! Those Brosnan kitesurfring scenes were definitely a work of art!!
@ninjaf00t9 жыл бұрын
Gabe N The kitesurfing scene wasn't in Goldeneye so what the hell are you talking about?
@TheImSolid9 жыл бұрын
ninjaf00t It was still part of the Brosnan series. I never said I was talking about Goldeneye.
@ninjaf00t9 жыл бұрын
My original post was about Goldeneye so what's your point? I never said all of Brosnan's Bond movies were awesome.
@eskreskao9 жыл бұрын
The Cyrillic "Ш" isn't actually a "W", it corresponds to the "sh" sound.
@ilkkarautio24495 жыл бұрын
shs to be presice, im not even kiddin. You need to put more sssssss to it.
@g.v.34935 жыл бұрын
eskreskao Да, это правда!
@johnbeauvais31595 жыл бұрын
Yep, like Shpagin
@sulzh5 жыл бұрын
@@ilkkarautio2449 no
@garyranieri38564 жыл бұрын
It has a 'z' sound in it and is similar to the second 'g' in 'garage'. Nice to see somebody educated enough to know the difference
@rakaman275 жыл бұрын
The biggest fiction in both the movie and book is that in the the real world either the CIA or MI6 would voluntarily offer to pay Le Chiffre debts in exchange for what he knows and he would end up working for them.
@Cielosta6 жыл бұрын
I love how Casino Royale still capture the vibes of a classic espionage/spy thriller movie that you can easily imagine be made back in the 50s or 60s in terms of storyline and character archetypes, but it also has all the goodness of over 50 years progress, such as the characterization of Vesper. Seriously, Eva Green is a goddess!! That much amount of girl power is just not possible in a Bond movie. She and M are the utmost badass females in all Bond movies
@declansheehan17688 жыл бұрын
I recall the gun in the book during the baccarat game being disguised to look like a cane.
@jhonny444445 жыл бұрын
As in Valentin's cane from the world is not enough?
@jazzx2514 жыл бұрын
@@jhonny44444 They do cross-over stuff alot - doesn't surprise me. Die Another Day plot basically mirrors book "Moonraker" plot. Villain gets plastic surgery and becomes a respected British billionaire. They then fund Britain's nuclear missile program. On the day when a supposed "test launch" is to be televised ... they've secretly programmed it to not explode in the North Sea, but to deviate to London and explode there! Both Die Another Day and book Moonraker have the horrible villain say into the cameras: "you have no idea how your lives are about to changed" [or to that effect!]
@KageNoTora744 жыл бұрын
I had wanted to see more of Valentin in the series.
@matthewgiven33968 жыл бұрын
This was great, Casino Royal was the first book of it's type that I read in one sitting, I spent six hour on the edge of my seat reading the book, not even getting up to use the bathroom, it is that intense of a novel. The film restored my faith in the Bond film franchise and this episode did a great job of going over the differences between the two. Thanks for making it.
@MaxxMcGeeImpactStudios9 жыл бұрын
Very good! That gives me a totally new point of view of the film, great work!
@CineFix9 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Maxx!
@ultmvids9 жыл бұрын
+CineFix hey can you do jumanji misery and IT
@zeked42009 жыл бұрын
+CineFix Why haven't you done A Clockwork Orange...there are quite a few differences I can think of. It'd be awesome to see that.
@quietdemon81389 жыл бұрын
+Zeke D that would be awesome
@elranger999 жыл бұрын
You beat me to it!!
@genuinesaucy7 жыл бұрын
I think it's important to note that the attempt to kill Bond in the book was tried AT the card table, with a one-shot silenced .45 hidden inside a cane. Dude straight up just tells Bond to give up or he'll be quietly shot and collapse without anyone realizing what happened until the assassin is long gone. Definitely not as cool as the movie's poisoning scene but still pretty cool.
@jamesmata29454 жыл бұрын
Exactly correct
@J.S.MacDirty8 жыл бұрын
Actually Bond is described as having cold light Gray/ Blue eyes
@g.v.34935 жыл бұрын
While “The bitch is dead” line from the movie reflected his own hurt feelings, in the book he was thinking of all of the other agents who were tortured because of her.
@dravenuk8 жыл бұрын
The 2006 movie is a fabulous adaptation/update of the book and is my fave Bond film. Craig is terrific and Eva Green is just sublime in every way.
@HugoStiglitz887 жыл бұрын
Eva Green is hot. Good example of how hot british chicks can be though IMO, she's not the hottest girl even in Casino Royale. That hispanic girl Bond fucked that was married was the hottest hands down.
@TylzorJPG6 жыл бұрын
technically he didnt fucked her.
@brianwalendy37355 жыл бұрын
@@HugoStiglitz88 she's French
@charlesmagyari1785 жыл бұрын
Sorry but this version is an insult to the JB legacy, Craig's style (or lack thereof) just doesn't fit, and having him pine after Vesper after he finds out she's a double agent...garbage...not sure how you find any of Craig's movies satisfying as a Bond flick....please let's get a new Bond!!!!!
@brianwalendy37355 жыл бұрын
@@charlesmagyari178 yeah, well that's just, like, your opinion, man.
@Mikes664427 жыл бұрын
Casino Royale with Daniel Craig was terrific! It's a pity they couldn't repeat that success with the other films. Great opening foot chase with Craig.
@jasemalvis21408 жыл бұрын
You know I think it'd be kinda cool to see the story's accuracy taken to new hights. think of it: Same movie, but it takes place IN the actual 50s with a new portrayal of Bond.
@pvtrichter88168 жыл бұрын
do you mean it would have something akin to an alternate world wherein it's set in the 50's but somehow still modern!!? interesting concept!!
@Balty_Burnip8 жыл бұрын
pvtrichter88 Or its just set in the 50's.
@pvtrichter88168 жыл бұрын
Simple enough !! they would realistically put a modern spin on it THO!! enjoy bruv!!
@BitcoinMotorist9 жыл бұрын
It's been almost two decades since I've read the book but the scene where Le Chiffre's henchman threatens Bond with a gun is very suspenseful and well done. And it wasn't just a gun with a silencer. It was also disguised as a cane. Do you guys actually read the books before you do these?
@nitsuagaming61214 жыл бұрын
I just read the book and i love that scene but also bond being poisoned makes more sense considering how do you get away with shooting a guy in public even if the gun is disguised as a cane
@WG554 жыл бұрын
@@nitsuagaming6121 As Leiter explains, the thug came in alone, standing in the crowd, with no connection to Le Chiffre. And when Bond forces the malacca stick away from him, the thug is able to escape in the chaos. Unfortunately, his fingerprints were still on the stick.
@speedracer19453 жыл бұрын
I didnt read that one but a few .
@NickOwens9 жыл бұрын
I just watched the film, and you upload this. Excellent timing as always, Cinefix.
@naughtydog16177 жыл бұрын
I just recently finished reading the 1953 novel. And actually, the torture from the novel was VERY different from the movie (besides the "wooden carpet beater" part). In the movie we see Bond being humorous about the whole situation and he is only hit like 5 times (in the balls). In the novel it is VERY dark, VERY serious, and VERY intense. Bond was in so much pain and so weak that he couldn't even gather enough saliva to talk. I think he was only able to say just 1 or 2 words to Le Chiffre throughout the whole ordeal. Bond wasn't humorous AT ALL! In fact he was so busy trying to remember the tactics of staying alive through the torture. Le Chiffre hit Bond's body ALL OVER and for OVER 10 FREAKING MINUTES too nonstop! Bond had a large ring of sweat under his chair AND he lost a sh*t load of blood too! He even fainted from the torture! The aftermath in the movie when Bond is recovering in the nursery home he doesn't seem too bad. However, in the novel Bond is freaking TRAUMATIZED by the torture he just went through! When he tells Mathis everything that happened to him, he starts to FREAK OUT and SWEAT WITH FEAR when he thinks about the torture Le Chiffre put him through! I'm not certain but I think the novel even said Bond had freaking NIGHTMARES about the torture! I kind of wish they had went with the dark tone of the torture from the novel into the movie because it is a LOT more interesting than what was in the movie (in my opinion).
@cjmcc52317 жыл бұрын
They didn't use a simple gun to try and assassinate bond at the casino. It was a gun disguised as a can which they aimed at his spine- the silencer and perfect close range would kill him and make it look like he had fainted. Movie scene is better though.
@nitsuagaming61214 жыл бұрын
But then people would see the blood
@nitsuagaming61214 жыл бұрын
Which is why i perfer the poision in the film but the book scene is suspenseful
@dellefranz9 жыл бұрын
"...Awful Pierce Brosnan entries." ... WHAT?!? Goldeneye was a fantastic movie, and Pierce Brosnan made a perfect Bond in that movie!
@harryburganjr.9699 жыл бұрын
+Kevin "FortuneCookieBeer" Traberg although Goldeneye was great it still does not make up for the god awful mess known as Die Another Day.
@blackwaltz4639 жыл бұрын
+Kevin Traberg (FortuneCookieBeer) Two words: KITESURFING SCENE
@AHHHHHHHHHHHHl9 жыл бұрын
The kitesurfing scene is not the only thing that made Die Another Day terrible, Bond had virtual reality training sunglasses and a ridiculous invisible car.
@blackwaltz4639 жыл бұрын
Akaaraq Hansen I know it's not, but is the most memorable of the awful moments.
@HugoStiglitz887 жыл бұрын
Nope. Pierce was the biggest wimp of all the bond's. A gust of wind could knock that dude over. He should've put on muscle for the role and at least be convincing like Daniel Craig AKA the best bond. And Sean Connery also, Connery seems believable. Pierce isn't.
@aitornavarro65978 жыл бұрын
8:46 wrong in the movie he drives Aston Martin DBS not a DB5. The DB5 he drives when he's in the Bahamas.
@HugoStiglitz887 жыл бұрын
Also he drives a DB5 in Skyfall. Plus didn't Sean Connery drive one?
@jamesshaw20094 жыл бұрын
@@HugoStiglitz88 erm sean Connery drove the db5 in goldfinger and thunderball get your facts right
@alisaconser60203 жыл бұрын
Pretty cool they were able to reboot and innovate while staying pretty faithful to the source material
@bloodrunsclear8 жыл бұрын
Wow...I'm surprised actually how faithful this movie was O_o
@56Jagman7 жыл бұрын
I assume that you do not consider all the changes that have been made just to make the story less "politically incorrect" or the changes that have been made to shift the era of the story 50+ years into the future as being of any significance then? The plot is quite faithful but not a lot else is!
@locutusdborg1265 жыл бұрын
@@56Jagman Changing Baccarat to poker so the rubes in USA could identify was lame.
@MrConstantine025 жыл бұрын
@@locutusdborg126 1) Hold'em Poker is a much, MUCH, more exciting game than baccarat, and 2) It's not just the "rubes in the USA". The vast majority of people in the world have no fucking idea of what baccarat even is at this day and age. Hell, reading the 'Casino Royale' novel was honestly the first time I'd even heard of that shit (and no, I'm not American)
@gabbar51ngh3 жыл бұрын
Same.
@1SaG4 жыл бұрын
Gotta admit it... the "Make sure junk still works"-bulletpoint and the "Bond getting his balls patched up"-animation had me in tears... :D
@diezel449 жыл бұрын
You guys need to do Forest Gump
@DemonBoy32238 жыл бұрын
Maybe a few suggestions for _What's_ _the_ _Difference?_: The Sum of All Fears Patriot Games Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? = Blade Runner Angels & Demons I Am Legend
@luqas995 жыл бұрын
The Bible and The Quran.
@kobizarre20034 жыл бұрын
Blade runner, the name surely would make it in the video.
@raoularmagnac20374 жыл бұрын
@kishenkoolskills90 How about Alec Baldwin in The Hunt for Red October?
@sharpenedsphere83459 жыл бұрын
Do Frankenstein or the modern prometheus by Mary Shelley Please !!!
@briannaMBrown9 жыл бұрын
HEY EVERYBODY!!! SCOTT CAWTHORN IS IN THE COMMENTS SECTION!!!!!!!!!!
@andyaquino25869 жыл бұрын
+briannaMBrown in case you're not joking, it's not actually him
@leftcoaster678 жыл бұрын
+The Sea Bottle Vlogs Both has a scientist creating life. Other than that NOTHING is the same.
@thewall11796 жыл бұрын
I would imagine they meant the original 1931 James Whale adaptation. The most significant difference is that in the original novel, the monster wasn't a dumb brute that goes on a rampage. He was instead an intelligent sociopath that serves as a more developed antagonist to Frankenstein. Also, the whole narrative is framed as a secondhand anecdote a failed writer and explorer received from the doctor himself as he lay dying in the north pole. Yeah, the film was nowhere near as ambitious in scale or philosophy.
@alexander.m969 жыл бұрын
it's 'Daniel Craig' not ' Daniel Creg'
@Floydthefuckbag9 жыл бұрын
+alex martin I just call him James Blond.
@IttsJoell9 жыл бұрын
+Floydthefuckbag dont you men blonde?
@IttsJoell9 жыл бұрын
+JJ Geek Don't I mean 'mean'?
@Floydthefuckbag9 жыл бұрын
JJ Geek Both spellings are correct, but blond works better for the joke.
@emmittmorgans80769 жыл бұрын
+JJ Geek No... "blond" vs "blonde" is one of the few cases where English has a different adjective for each sex. Men are "blond" and women are "blonde."
@angel-k899 жыл бұрын
Hey Casey and Michael, first off I just want to say you guys are great, the whole Cinefix channel is and I really appreciate how you guys take the time to break down major difference between films and the books or comics they are based off of. I learn a lot and feel better informed. One property I would very much love to see you guys explore is "A Clockwork Orange," there is a history with that adaptation and I am confident many of your fans would be interested in a "What's the Difference" video on that. In any case, I certainly look forward to your future videos and give my support all the way!
@caseyredmon58139 жыл бұрын
+Angelo “Angel-K” Kerrigan Thanks Angelo! A Clockwork Orange has certainly been kicked around the office. Maybe season 2 What's the Difference. Thanks again for the words of encouragement!
@Crlarl9 жыл бұрын
Are you going to do one of these for The Martian?
@EndOfSmallSanctuary979 жыл бұрын
+dimmddr1 The movie's so accurate to the book that it's sort of not worth making a video on it.
@Crlarl9 жыл бұрын
WheresWallace4883 Why not? There are lots of differences. Remember the "lucky" drill?
@EndOfSmallSanctuary979 жыл бұрын
dimmddr1 The only sort-of significant differences are a few extra challenges and setbacks that Mark faces, such as the drill-power-outage, the dust storm and rovers tipping. Oh, and also the rather silly Iron Man rescue and the actual ending. All of the characters are pretty much the exact same and all of the basic story beats are the same.
@samtarrant20939 жыл бұрын
+WheresWallace4883 besides that could be chalked up to them not showing the days instead of them not happening.
@jaimeguido30369 жыл бұрын
+Bot Squidly fty
@mcrazza5 жыл бұрын
Casino Royale (2006) still feels fresh 13 years later. SO good. And *sigh * how can you not fall in love with Eva Green every.single.time.
@dinomonzon74935 жыл бұрын
Dr. No, From Russia, With Love,Thunderball, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, & For Your Eyes Only were also mostly faithful to the novels. Bond's physical description was closely matched by Sir Sean Connery & Timothy Dalton.
@فتحيحسين-ث5ظ2 жыл бұрын
CR is a great (modern) adaptation of the book !.
@alexsilva289 жыл бұрын
Wow. Another awesome video guys!!! I had no idea the movie was so similar to the book!
@CineFix9 жыл бұрын
+Alejandro “Alex” Silva Yeah, it is! But the small number of differences kind of make it even more fun to go in-depth about them!
@MichaelLeroi8 жыл бұрын
Daniel Cregg?
@WhaleManMan8 жыл бұрын
MichaelLeroi Johnny Topples?
@Dragonfly-00106 жыл бұрын
Yeah. American pronounciation. If the can say 'CRAY' then they can pronounce Craig correctly.
@andrewgelinas93359 жыл бұрын
Finally I've been waiting for this forever
@nicholi89338 жыл бұрын
I read the book, it explained how to play bacharach very well. When I watch some of the older films that he plays this I actually know what is going on.
@Digscomics6 жыл бұрын
This is my favourite Bond movie. I actually read the novel before the movie came out and I was impressed how loyal it was.
@PUARockstar Жыл бұрын
Same here. Although through Madagascar chase I thought it would be nothing like the book, despite I recognised 2 kills that made Bond a double-oh from the book.
@CornishCreamtea078 жыл бұрын
You should do one on From Russia with Love
@mdo78 жыл бұрын
Same here.
@SolarDragon0078 жыл бұрын
And Moonraker. That video would be like half an hour long because of how different the film and book are.
@mdo78 жыл бұрын
SolarDragon007 yeah Moonraker, that one would be about 45 minutes long because of the big differences between film and the book.
@weltvonalex8 жыл бұрын
or the others books and movies :) i have read them and now the movies seem strange, and most of the time he is not such a jerk like they show him in th emovies
@SolarDragon0078 жыл бұрын
***** He feels like more of a relatable every-man then the film incarnations for sure. Fleming wanted Bond to be a relatively down to earth character who goes on extraordinary adventures and meets larger then life villains. The film versions,(particularly Connery, Moore, and Brosnan), make HIM a larger than life character.
@cha59 жыл бұрын
"My dear boy, the time for games is over." I'll always remember that torture scene from the novel.
@LynnHermione5 жыл бұрын
You got stuff wrong: - He's not to take down LeChiffre, just prevent him from getting the russians' money back. - He doesn't sprout one-liners after killing. In fact, canon Bond hates killing, even in self defense, and even tho he's authorized and can kill in cold blood, he always tries not to. -Because Vesper is a russian double agent, everything she does is on purpose to sabotage Bond. All her damsel-y qualities are an act. - If you actually read the whole scene, Bond is not actually angry at her. He just knows HE gets distracted around women and is angry at himself. He tends to internally rant about shit before coming around to "actually I'm just cranky" A LOT in the books . - The married women bit IS actually from the books! He's the boy-toy sidepiece of a few. - Bond *loves* M (like a father). He actually uses the word in the books. And M is a grumpy, closed off fellow but the feeling is mutual. - Book Bond is actually NOT shitty to women. - Book Bond's car is not a fancy toy, it's an old-as-balls monstrosity he keeps going out of sheer love. It gets trashed permanently either in this book or the next because fans brote to Fleming that the car was shitty. - The main difference in the torture scene is that in the book Bond reacts LIKE AN ACTUAL HUMAN, not a one-liner-sprouting machine. He knows he will break, he barely holds on even tho the time the torture took was short (and everybody is amazed he held on so long), and the event shakes him so much he seriously considers quitting. - If you think Bond/Vesper was unclear I don't know what to tell you other than go back and reread. They have the most delightful 50s romantic comedy dynamic, and Bond falls in love with women really easily. Book Bond is NOT a sleazy fellow at all. The one time he acts as such is incredibly OOC and clearly Fleming trying to copy Connery's Bond. - Bond is not actually callous or cold. He actually visits Vesper's grave every year - that's how he meets his eventual wife. Fun fact: he falls in love with her because she drives BETTER than him. What's the difference: The book is better.
@Lootroq5 жыл бұрын
Wow, thanks for detailing all of that. I've always what book Bond was like, but couldn't be bothered to read the books
@LynnHermione5 жыл бұрын
@@Lootroq Welcome! :) They are really lots of fun, and increasingly pulpy. CR is the most serious.
@rudolftrost35345 жыл бұрын
@@LynnHermione High time for Book Bond to get his own HBO TV series. I own all the books (even lost of the aprés-Fleming ones and Book Bond is so much more endearing and human.
@jamesoblivion7 жыл бұрын
Worthy of note, Craig is not the cinema's first blue-eyed Bond. That would be Timothy Dalton. I was shocked by Casino Royale. By how good it was, and even more so, by how faithful it was. Not since On Her Majesty's Secret Service has a Bond film even *attempted* to remain so true to a Fleming narrative, and Craig, to me, embodies what many of the other Bonds have lacked. As Roger Moore famously mused, "To me, he looks like a killer. He looks as though he knows what he's doing. I look as though I might cheat at backgammon." Craig is also marvelous at taking a beating.
@ziggyzaggyshaggy83129 жыл бұрын
If you guys havent already, can you do on for Scott Pilgrim Vs The World. Pleaseee :D
@xanderfoley66412 жыл бұрын
The book and movie are so good. Felix is such a fun character and a great friend
@checkmichlinus78896 жыл бұрын
8:44: "In the movie it is a Aston Martin DB5." No wrong, it's a Aston Martin DBS. But apart from that a very good video.
@MichaelAarons17019 жыл бұрын
Y'all forgot to note that between the film and novel, the goals for what MI6 wanted regarding Le Chifre were to make him desperate to defect vs just plain eliminated due to being difficult enemy agent. You also forgot to note that Mathis' nationality and familiarity to Bond were changed. The two were acquaintances prior to the book's events.
@thomasbaron53678 жыл бұрын
Casino Royale is absolutely the best James Bond movie ever! Daniel Craig is the best James Bond!
@DarinDmarkovic12 жыл бұрын
The American Bond, Jimmy, had some serious 50's swagger. I loved the performance.
@djjonasc9 жыл бұрын
Nice :D Could you also do On Her Majesty's Secret Service?
@romero3299 жыл бұрын
I recall Pierce Brosnan being quite popular in the 1990s, but it seems people have retroactively turned on him. Yes, the scripts were weak, but he was a great 007. He saved the franchise after the lackluster Timothy Dalton films. The producers are the ones who turned the quality of the films into shit (Die Another Day).
@JonathanRodriguez-nz9nw7 жыл бұрын
+romero329 too right. Maybe because his films were when I was growing up, but he is my favourite James Bond. Sean Connery and Daniel Craig are a close tie for second
@regularflurfy81747 жыл бұрын
_well I thought The Living Daylights was good_
@HugoStiglitz887 жыл бұрын
No he wasn't LOL Brosnan was 150lbs soaking wet. I could've kicked his ass at the time and I was only like 12 when die another day came out LOL
@JustinCase999997 жыл бұрын
Hugo Stiglitz Irrelevant. How about Roger Moore then, or even Sean Connery in his latest Bond movies? Brosnan was a great Bond, a perfect balance between all the previous Bonds.
@crazycomicguy50636 жыл бұрын
romero329 I thought die another day was pretty good. It wasn't bad or good, it was just alright
@RangerXML9 жыл бұрын
I loved both the book and the movie, this was the first time I was really happy with a book to movie adaptation. If only Quantum of Solace didn't spoil the whole thing.
@CineFix9 жыл бұрын
Too bad indeed!
@aymanahrara86319 жыл бұрын
+CineFix bro we wont season 4 for bad days please
@chripposh8 жыл бұрын
also wanna the three new movies has in commen? Spectre. Everyone villain on the bonds are a member of Spectre which told in the Spectre movie.
@FVD7 жыл бұрын
Kinda wish they could go back and remake that movie.... while possibly bringing back Martin Campbell to finish the story as well.
@HugoStiglitz887 жыл бұрын
Yea. I've always wondered how they managed to fuck up Quantum Solace so badly. I have a question, who is the hottest bond girl ever? Might've been Gemma Arterton if she didn't have that stupid red hair. The GA in Clash of the Titan's would be my #1.
@tomashize6 жыл бұрын
For me Brosnan was the best casting and Goldeneye the best film. Although tbh I love all the actors. Best novel is From Russia with Love. Great read.
@GRex77779 жыл бұрын
I spent literally about half the video just thinking "That's Dr Lector!"..... I need to get out more....
@jac69959 жыл бұрын
On Her Majestys Secret Service is definitely the most faithful adaptation of a Bond novel.
@tritone118 жыл бұрын
so basically..the movie is the upgraded version of the book:) btw the greatest bond movie of them all
@sherrattpemberton60898 жыл бұрын
maybe not upgraded but changed to reflect the times it was made in
@楽楽-v6z7 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say upgraded. Movies tend to have more action but books focus more on the details. Also, much more information can be stored in a book than in a 90〜120min movie.
@kahfernandez81865 жыл бұрын
@@larastroud5081 Really? I would say that Goldeneye is the best.
@Jantv815 жыл бұрын
All the Bond films have been “ adapted” with a modern twist. Guy Hamilton described that the dragons have changed... apart from only the Russians that Fleming described. The main problem I had with this film was the so called Reintroduction of Bond, even though he’s been around since 1962. Plus for me their was too many gadgets. Sorry I dislike the Craig movies. No one will beat Connery.
@kobizarre20034 жыл бұрын
Skyfall
@ForceMaximus848 жыл бұрын
I don't know why, but 13:18 cracks me up. Lol
@afghaaj7 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know which event inspired Fleming to wrote "Casino Royal"? And on which man and real WWII spy Bond's character is based upon?
@bighuge10607 жыл бұрын
I wasn't aware how much the film followed the novel until I listened to the audiobook of Casino Royale. I previously thought the film beyond Bond's recovery was the screenwriter's invention. Upon experiencing the book and movie, I think the movie definitely improved on the material. Your comparison videos are great and truly appreciated.
@Big-guy19815 жыл бұрын
Hey! what about the game? In the novel, Bond was a genius baccarat player while Craig's Bond relies on mere luck
@AndrewChapman2 жыл бұрын
Just finished reading the book. Oh man, those last few chapters. So sad😢
@stagarmsm47 жыл бұрын
brosnan was awesome. his movies where just the right fit for the 90's just as crieg is the right fit for the 2000's
@the_godfather99745 жыл бұрын
All but goldeneye weren‘t a good fit for anything Not even the 90s thats why they stopped doing them all together. Brosnan himself delivered a awesome Bond performance but the plots of his movies were sadly utter rubish
@rawrbeez66255 жыл бұрын
I love brosnan but he was a shadow of Timothy Dalton
@poiny915 жыл бұрын
His last one was so terrible though that hardly anyone today appreciates his first 3...
@RobynHarris4 жыл бұрын
Very good. “Casino Royale” is the only one of the books I have read. It is also my favorite film in the series. I like the ruthless, brutal Bond. Much better than the comedic figure he was forced into by many of the movies.
@Resimaster6 жыл бұрын
I once won a poker hand with the exact same straight flush that Bond does.
@rudranroy21094 жыл бұрын
I won. In a game. Not in real life.
@gordon840169 жыл бұрын
I love love love the episodes of "What's the difference?" So well done, filled with good info and humor. Please do Die Hard vs. Nothing Lasts Forever!!!!
@caseyredmon58139 жыл бұрын
Thanks Nicholas!
@robertfreymuth67349 жыл бұрын
you guys really should redo the beginning of this video. Pierce Brosnan films where are mega hits. the producers wanted to bring Pierce back for Casino Royale but felt that his Bond movies were a little too light to do the novel justice. we also thought the audience would have a hard time seeing a darker James Bond being played by Pierce Brosnan. fact Pierce Brosnan's bond was the first Bond to break a billion dollars in every movie. it was over top silliness of Die Another Day which made them want to switch direction. the legal battles or all over Casino Royale and Thunderball. it had nothing to do whether or not Pierce Brosnan's films we're good or bad.
@alexbiersner33502 жыл бұрын
Judi Dench is a delight every time I see her in the Bond movies and the tv show As Time Goes By
@crimsondeath74689 жыл бұрын
you do know smerch was a real organisation right? and not just a precursor to the fictional spectre
@Rbrowno979 жыл бұрын
8:47 - Correction: in the movie it's an Aston Martin DBS. The DB5 is Bond's original movie Aston Martin.
@mus7c9 жыл бұрын
I really want to see one of these for The Perfume.
@codename617 Жыл бұрын
5:11 actually it was in a cane. This was one of the many ways that Fleming would introduce clever gadgets in his books. Though Q Branch supplied equipment to the agents, they weren't commonly gadgets like a cane gun or a gun hidden in a copy of War & Peace, or a knife in Urma Bunt's shoe.
@zacharyrussell96187 жыл бұрын
Actually, the assassin at Bond's back during the card game was pretty interesting. His "gun" was disguised as an ornate cane, with the stock of the cane serving as a silencer.
@rhysstewart46504 жыл бұрын
Anyone know what the scene around 0:34 is from? With the kid pushing the other kid over? All the clips they show when introducing themselves look interesting but I've no idea of their names. Thanks in advance 😁
@firstwavenegativity63798 жыл бұрын
There is a mistake here, in the book he was not described as having dark hair and eyes but as having dark hair and blue eyes
@john-007files58 жыл бұрын
+Coolguy i agree..when i remember right, it is in FRWL (and/or in Casino Royale) where Fleming wrote "blue-grey eyes"
@saxyrep19 жыл бұрын
Loved the changes, super dynamic! Peace!
@ThePirateDjango8 жыл бұрын
eva green tho, omg. No other bond girl can compare.
@ronniejdio94116 жыл бұрын
Shes amazing. But many many " compare "
@Freddydemaesschalck6 жыл бұрын
Ursula Andress is THE Bond girl
@PedroOrdep-kv5vw5 жыл бұрын
@@Freddydemaesschalck Ursula Andress is overrated.
@MohamedMostafa-qn6zk5 жыл бұрын
Totally agree
@maryparaskeva6 жыл бұрын
I thought chapter 9 was called the game is baccarat and not winner and loser + what's the sad piano playing on the back round in 12:07
@DisgustedBatman9 жыл бұрын
You guys should seriously do forrest gump.
@richardhughes41346 жыл бұрын
Mama always said life is like a box of chocolates you never know what you gonna get.
@mkprocter8825 жыл бұрын
@@richardhughes4134 ***'Was' like a box of chocolates
@phmwu73685 жыл бұрын
Rolex watch in the novels, untill Omega bought their way-in...
@AtheistOrphan5 жыл бұрын
Ph MWU - Bond wore Rolex in the earlier films.
@jazzx2514 жыл бұрын
@@AtheistOrphan Bond's his own man. He's allowed to change what brand of watch he wears.
@dylankaiser55466 жыл бұрын
this is my favorite bond film. i know a lot of people say that goldfinger was the best but i prefer this movie since goldfinger was just about a heist. this was about a genuinely sadistic villain who's motivation was more than just to get rich. and the parkour scene is just perfect.
@DADDYFATSACKABLE9 жыл бұрын
The 2006 Casino Royale poster at around the 30 second mark looks a little different than I remember. Was that a real poster for the movie? I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just wondering.
@caseyredmon58139 жыл бұрын
One of many.
@Taidehaamu9 жыл бұрын
This is the less used poster where there is no Casino Royale behind them.
@briannaMBrown9 жыл бұрын
It's probably a variant poster or somthing.
@samuelperezgarcia6 жыл бұрын
You are so rude!
@jacklockwood42015 жыл бұрын
Used this as a source for a research paper. Appreciate it.
@slavatoin82739 жыл бұрын
What's the difference between the book Crime and Punishment and the film adaptation Ratatouille?
@mathers76006 жыл бұрын
You guys should do more what's the difference on the rest of the James Bond books written by Ian Fleming
@Caramirdan7 жыл бұрын
It's not a "W" but the Cyrillic for "sh", the first letter in the Russian word for spy.
@rabidspace69519 жыл бұрын
Great video as always guys!
@JamesDarkos9 жыл бұрын
how about taking a crack at the hanibal books. i know great timing, but still i would love to see how you guys do hanibal
@TheOneTrueErica5 жыл бұрын
I had not realized La Chiffre was portrayed by Mads Mikkelsen. Casino Royale was one helluva movie and I'm glad the changes were all to the benefit of the new Bond films.
@Prinzmetal499 жыл бұрын
Quantum of Solace is not disapointing, it's just different. I like it as a continuation to Casino Royale.
@Prinzmetal499 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed it, even more than Skyfall.
@ForceMaximus846 жыл бұрын
It’s still the worst of Daniel Craig’s movies.
@combatsportsaddict23346 жыл бұрын
+forcemaximus84 it is but just because its the worst doesn't mean its bad
@kahfernandez81865 жыл бұрын
It's ok if you like but for me at least it's a cofusing mess of a movie.
@qwertymanor5 жыл бұрын
@@ForceMaximus84 spectre is the worst
@meow-px6kk4 жыл бұрын
god, the best line of that film was just bond and vesper bantering in the car. "You're not my type." "Smart?" "Single."