CASIO fx-991CW Statestics and Distirbution Calculations using CLASSSWIZ Calculator

In this video we learn how to to Statestics and Distirbution Calculations using Casio calculaotr FX-991CW and FX-570CW calculators.
Full Video maual for FX-991CW and FX-571CW: • CASIO fx-991CW fx-570C...
Full Video maual for FX-991EX and FX-571EX FX-991DE: • Getting Started with C...
**** Purchase Casio CLASSWIZ FX-991CW
eBay: ebay.us/kQaet9
Amazon USA: amzn.to/3yNQgzJ
Amazon Germany: amzn.to/3JRy6nd
Amazon UK: amzn.to/3yPAkNy
Amazon France: amzn.to/3JoLUEd
Amazon Japan: amzn.to/42lSTX6
Amazon Canada: amzn.to/3JN9A6y
**** Purchase Casio CLASSWIZ FX-991EX from Affiliated Stores below
eBay: ebay.us/DlKUlp
Amazon USA: amzn.to/3l7JzAe
Amazon UK: amzn.to/3DajqKA
Amazon Germany: amzn.to/36o4Jb3
Amazon France: amzn.to/3LbXeCR
All other Europe: amzn.to/3LbXeCR
Amazon Canada: amzn.to/30QUfut
Tutorial by Ahmad Shamshiri from Canada
#equaser #equaserCasioFX991CW #equaserCalculator

[@stephencoy2021]

Very good. Fair play.

[@benmalkin6020]

Thank you!

[@SPra761]

Hi ! Can it be calculated Normal distribution using z value, by CASIO fx-991CW ? As per your illustration, if we put x, mu & sigma value, its not providing same result whereas other calculators do. (as we know z=(x - mu) / sigma) Please support.

[@danielweber8457]

Here's how to calculate a Z-Value using the calculator: Home > Distribution > Inverse Normal Area: 𝛼 (one sided) or 𝛼/2 and 1-a/2 (two sided) 𝛍: 0 σ: 1 (for normal distribution) Select OK on Execute; this will output the z-value you would normally look up in a table. If you put the same values into the Normal PD function, that's giving you the probability density on the y-axis, not the Z-value. Hopefully that's what you are looking for.

[@malladibhogyaswetha4704]

I did it find statistics option after 1 variable and after selecting 2 and catlog😢

[@shubhrajit2117]

Plz add timestamps...

[@lee3003xx]

at 2:42 you entered 600 instead of 66

[@adhithyanrajan4383]

kay🎉

[@SaiSai-lz3tk]

Probability is in increasing by adding above probability... 😑 😑

[@equaser]

:-)