Casio G-Shock DW-5600UE-1, GW-M5610U-1 & GW-5000U-1. Pros And Cons Of Each Watch.

[@Gameonslayer]

I have the middle one and i love the red line around the display it gives a retro look to it ❤

[@ndadson]

I love the square G-Shocks and have all 3 of these and the stainless GMWB5000. The quality of the GW-5000 is so far beyond the other 2. They all have their place. Awesome watches!

[@gregrodriguez3169]

Nice video! You didn’t specifically articulate this point, but in addition to the thickness differences, the length (or “lug-to-lug”) is shorter on the 5610, which also contributes to it wearing more easily on a smaller wrist. The screw down case back feature on the high end version is nice, and virtually guarantees that when (if) the solar battery needs replaced in 15 or so years, you won’t have to worry about compromising the water resistance if there is a misstep in fiddling with the standard case back on the others.

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thank you! Great point. I only found out about the L2L distance while editing. I included some screenshots with dimensions 😁 Definitely the 5610 wears the best on my wrist and the 5000 looks the very best. The 5600 is a no brainer when on sale 👌🏻

[@Dragoneye-cp6fv]

Vote for trump

[@rcc911]

Thank you for the video,i almost bought it the M5610u-1er but now i go with gw-500u-1er

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thanks for your comment. I am glad you found the video useful.

[@leejeremy7411]

I need that Belgium beer, first of all. Great review, btw!

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thank you very much.

[@Quatorze1516]

Thank you for this very interesting video. I own the 5610 - it is so great with the solar power and the radio controlled time setting. The only thing I do not like is that after some time the strap begins to look shiny and a little bit cheap. So one day I will give me the gift and buy the 5000.

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thanks for sharing your insights! What about replacing the original strap? I haven’t looked into that option but I did go with the Jaysandkays NATO adapter route before.

[@Quatorze1516]

@ My plan is to keep the 5610 and to appreciate the faded and used look. And for the nicer days I will be happy and proud with the 5000.

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Sounds like a solid plan!

[@deadonit1967]

What a GREAT review! Thank you for your details. Like Gameonslayer below, I have the middle one as well. While an afterthought, wasn't initially sure that the additional $60 was worth it over the DW-5600U. HOWEVER, understanding the solar function and MB6, I did the math on replacement batteries over time along with the MB6 I think it WAS worth it. I still may pick up a DW-5600U as well. I agree that its display is a bit clearer without all the printed shenanigans on the screen.

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thank you! I did the same math and ended keeping the 5610 👍

[@albertsylvester2981]

DW 5600 UE1 GREAT WATCH CASIO MAKES EVERYBODY HAPPY

[@rohansangle7777]

Well explained Sir

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thank you very much!

[@JamesSmith-qs4hx]

DW-5600UE-1.... All you need GW-M5610U-1..... Best value/features GW-5000U-1..... If you know, you know. I've got them all but only wear the cheap one🤣

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Great points! For me it’s the 5610 because of the specs and the (smaller and lighter) fit compared to the other two models.

[@ianwalker4803]

Snap me too, I always grab the DW-5600

[@jemandthemystery]

Good comparison. The 5000u should really come with the Casio combi bracelet. The individual, moving links and the micro adjust positions in the clasp mean that you can find a good fit. The rubber strap, although more soft and comfortable than found on the cheaper models, is made for a thin/flat square. The deeper/thicker body of the 5000u doesn’t work as well with it. As it turns out, I own both the 5610u and the 5000u so I bought a combi bracelet for the 5000u and used it’s softer, more comfortable strap on my 5610u. Both watches are improved by that arrangement. OK, the reviewer (and perhaps others here) might not like the even greater weight of the 5000u with the resin and steel link combi bracelet (approximately 113gm). It carries it well though due to the better balance and fit of that combination. Bear in mind that the all-metal square series in stainless steel top out at around 153+gm (about the same as a steel diving watch like a Rolex Submariner) so the 5000u with a combi bracelet is still very manageable.

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thanks for sharing these valuable insights! I also noticed the thinness of the soft strap of the 5000u.

[@jemandthemystery]

@@GadgetsforGentlemen It is thinner but (apparently) it is made of polyurethane, not resin like the chesper models.

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

@jemandthemystery Thanks for your clarification. I ended up keeping the M5610 (wearing it now while typing). It fitted the best on my wrist. Also the best value for money in my opinion.

[@jemandthemystery]

@@GadgetsforGentlemen I agree in terms of value for sure as it shares the same module. When I want either a very light on the wrist experience (active, sporty stuff where I don't want it to feel in the way - or even feel it all(!)) or a great watch for modding I choose the 5610u. It's great and that's why I own several of them for different applications. The good thing about having exactly the same module (3495) across different watches is that it is the same muscle memory operations. You don’t have to think about it. Casio squares with this module are the only watches I use so there is always a seamless change between watches. If I could only have one "desert island" or "do it all" watch, the 5000u with the combi bracelet is just class without the blinginess and weight (and coldness in sub zero temperatures) of all-steel watches. It's a private indulgence, not a public one and is the "sweet spot" watch that I wear the most.

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

@jemandthemystery thanks for sharing. I agree regarding the module. So much easier to use the same buttons instead of thinking what button to press. I would add adding a F91W for the days where you really want a super lightweight, thin and discrete digital watch.

[@henrik_DE89]

Thank you for this Video comparison. I am thinking of purchase a g shock square for the longest time, but i cant choose 😅 i would go for the expensive one because i like the look and would appreciate the better build quality. But about the case back, that is a good point to make, because i wont need the extra height.. thanks again and greetings from germany😊

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thanks for your kind words! Hope the video helped! I would recommend watching a few more on other channels to see which model suits you the best. For me it’s the M5610 because it wears a bit smaller and thinner.

[@dawidszalobryt8087]

Fantastic review,helped me to choose right watch. Middle version

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Much appreciated!

[@brianmsahin]

Very nice video ! Just subscribed. I love Leffe! You've just reminded me to stock up. They're very cool watches. On the first one I got the metal version GM-5600SS-1DR Street Spirit edition with the older 3229 module, but with negative display which is very clear. Functionality is exactly the same including seeing the time in stopwatch mode. The only difference is LCD backlight on the new one versus electro-luminescent on the 3229. In my humble opinion the LCD is a downgrade, though battery life is a little longer on it. Even though the most expensive I do have my eye on the tough solar one at the end! My GM-5600 is also 73 gms but it's from the metal bezel rather than the case back which is a standard one. Now, having watched your video I'm off to the "Tekel" as they say in Istanbul to get myself some Leffe beers !😊

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thanks for sharing your insights. You live in a beautiful city! I have fond memories exploring the city and its culture. I stayed near the Blue Mosque in Sultanahmet and there was a fantastic roof toop with a view on the Sea of Marmara. Enjoy those Belgian beers!

[@brianmsahin]

@GadgetsforGentlemen 👍😁

[@bau-m7q]

i like the 5610 construction but i can't go past the red line design :( probably 5000u it would a better option if you don't have a budget limit

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Agreed!

[@jax02zerotwo]

It is such a thin red line in all honesty. When I look at mine, on the daily, I never think "look at this red watch of mine," It is mostly sleek looking on my wrist anyway. You must already know this but there is a blue line version as well, and a negative display version as well. Cheers!

[@JamesSmith-qs4hx]

The first G shock square DW-5000C-1A from 1983 had the red line.....

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

@jax02zerotwo Thanks for your reply. I have considered the negative (all black) version but I think the display is hard to read. There is a Tough Solar version in blue (but no Multiband?) that is sold outside of the European Union.

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

@JamesSmith-qs4hx That’s true! I think I included a screenshot of the original model. However, I appreciate the current design of the 5600 (with blue) better.

[@Mike-kc8rl]

I would love to see casio introduce the dw 5600ue with the full metal case as of the gw 5000u! I prefer the metal case i also have all three plus one you have not reviewed the g5600u which is the 5600u plus solar ! Same look as 5600u .

[@ianwalker4803]

Great review, I own all three (Casio fan collector here) I am a big G-shock square fan and like all three but my favorite is the cheapest DW-5600UE-1

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thank you! Now I really like to know why the 5600 is your favorite as someone that owns all three models.

[@ianwalker4803]

@@GadgetsforGentlemen difficult to say really, for three nearly identical watches it does look slightly better and for me it wears slightly better , It's the one I always go to, but all three are fantastic , any Casio fan would be happy with any of them

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Totally agree. These are such trustworthy watches with iconic designs.

[@MrBacchus18]

Why is it your favorite if I may ask? Seems like the othersare more feature rich.

[@ianwalker4803]

@@MrBacchus18 Its hard to say exactly why, if you only owned one , then any would be pleasing, it just looks fractionally better and wears fractionally better and I'm talking very small amounts here, its just the one most like the original and has an invisible something that just makes me smile more, so its my grab and go.

[@patsonti1703]

I only own the 5000u. Feel like it's sufficient.

[@deadonit1967]

Can you do a comparison of the GW-M5610U-1 vs. the GW-M5610-1? Trying to understand the difference that the "U" makes between them. Thanks.

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Hi, I don’t have that piece to demonstrate. The key difference to my understanding is the display. With the “U version” you can still see the time when you use the stopwatch and or timer. Also you can change the layout of the date. Hope it helps. For me the “U” is the “better” version.

[@TheBrian9210]

To add to this, the older version has a blue EL backlight while the newer "U" version has a white LED that can be set to light up for either 1.5 or 3 seconds when pressed. It can also automatically light up when you raise your wrist in the dark to look at the time which I'm unsure if the older model can do.

[@deadonit1967]

@@TheBrian9210 Thank you very much. What's interesting is that my new GW-M5610 has the selection of 1.5 or 3 seconds AS WELL AS auto-illumination when you raise your wrist. What is VERY nice is that this light ONLY comes on when it is dark. If you are in normal light and auto-illumination is turned on, it will NOT turn on. So it is actually detecting the environmental lighting levels which is very cool. I was surprised that my non 'U" version had these features.

[@TheBrian9210]

@@deadonit1967 oh cool! Great to hear even the older model gives you so much functionality 👌🏾

[@Jim58223]

Any Baby-G's or similar G-shocks under 40mm that are made in Japan or Thailand? Thank you.

[@plasticindices3385]

Nice video and review. Thanks

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thanks for your kind words!

[@danmarly5173]

Bien ! 🤗

[@chrizto0808]

You sound like a Malaysian.. are you?

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

No I am not.

[@JimWestrich]

A 1,85m white Malaysian with a Dutch accent, I assume

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

😂

[@watchthis90]

It's a very good video, but there are a few things I would like to add. You didn't mention how frustratingly difficult it is to press the buttons on the GW-5000U. If you use it a lot, it will bother you. The GW-M5610 and the GW-5000U have exactly the same module, 3495. That this module is packed in a metal case and therefore charged two and a half times as much is ridiculous. I say this despite the fact that I also have such a watch, and also the older model, the GW-5000-1. We watch freaks are not normal, are we? What you say about the LCD display is not true at all . The DW-5600UE has by far the best display. Hold it or any other watch in your hand, rotate them slowly, and see how much better its viewing angle is. The DW-5600UE beeps much louder than the other two. This is also a very important difference. Although it doesn't know the time zones, I like it even more because I don't have to step pointlessly when switching between modes. It is important to mention that the DW-5600UE can flash when it wakes up, which is a very nice feature, I use it. The outer cover of DW-5600UE and GW-5000U is interchangeable, the same size. I like the DW-5600 in a larger case than the GW-M5610, but with narrower numbers and a much more harmonious overall image. The GW-5000U is already different, because the larger numbers already look good in the larger case.

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Thanks for your elaborate comment!

[@watchthis90]

@ I was just practicing typing. If there was anything useful in it, I'm glad. :)

[@GadgetsforGentlemen]

Most definitely.

[@Biowolf626]

Is there another g shock square that shares the same lug to lug as the 5610u that features a screw down caseback?

[@watchthis90]

@@Biowolf626Why? What is the piont of the screwdown caseback? I’m just curious what is your reason. Older models has screwdown caseback (DW-5200C, DW-5600C, and the anniversary models.