"Leaving Neverland" director Dan Reed defends explosive Michael Jackson documentary

[@not_your_oppai1341]

Just because you read in the magazine or see it on the a TV screen doesn't mean it's factual.

[@kingofthebeast4024]

Not_Your_Oppai 13 Actual. But everyone wants to believe all about it.

[@BWasHere354]

King Of the Beast but everyone wants to read all about it

[@kingofthebeast4024]

A C Now You See Me can’t believe I had the lyrics wrong this entire time lol

[@ethandsouza6617]

They are the backstabbers........ they'll do anything for money

[@aporue5893]

people need to listen to that way more.

[@cyrilgarcia2485]

If my kids were molested, I wouldn’t settle for anything less than jail time for the perpetrators. Would you?

[@rizzingsince1969]

Mj didnt do it

[@bslomof-1901]

Precisely. No excuses.

[@jamesdawson2906]

Mj did not do it. STOP attacking him

[@shanecoolvideostevens9395]

P

[@Hercasl]

I wouldn't settle for anything but death. That's justice. Cutting off his wanna be white penis and choking him with it. But sadly, there are horrible parents in the world. MJ has gone on camera to say he wasn't close to his family. They didn't understand him. Why are his family members acting like they did? MJ was a very creepy person. Too many children coming out then retracting their statements. Victims are rarely believed. It's the same old thing.

[@timothyhaven7110]

So he basically heard a rumor and choose to exploit it for financial gain

[@natashas.1566]

That is how I see it. I feel that the director negotiated with the two story-tellers (who already testified on the side of MJ in Court) to come up with this story, all for money, not caring a slight bit about the harm that they are doing. The director seems anything but genuine. He shows traits of a narcissist, instead.

[@andreasleonlandgren3092]

Yeah exactly

[@bizchats110]

Exactly Timothy. Right on

[@shaquoneperkins2021]

Man let the man rest and stop clout chasing off someone estate

[@sideshowbob6416]

If you don't believe that a grown man with a zoo and a theme park hanging out with only younger boys and even admitting sleeping in bed with them is a child molester than I feel sorry for you. The kid touching freak blatantly flaunted what he was doing to the world then laughed about it. I mean it doesn't take a genius to see what was going on even back then.

[@illustriousct]

“I found their stories to be very very consistent” LLLLOOOOOOL

[@laracroftvideos]

Ikr!!! It literally takes one google search to see how inconsistent and inaccurate their testimonies are 💀

[@yoisthatJ1zxel]

@@laracroftvideos fr not even that,you can see the way they act in interviews they try and cover up their laughs.

[@grammarofficerkrupke4398]

Which story was consistent?

[@mariacullati2371]

The "STORY" has lots of inconsistencies...read more.

[@Niinunnu22]

@@mariacullati2371 could u point out the inconsistent parts for me? Just curious, not judging.

[@ifeanyijohn6323]

They are big liars, they should be arrested.

[@miguel_ikno]

I say the should have been arrested when people saw the documentary i swore that they would speak the truth at court and failed

[@sheemasiddique5121]

Lies and lies Wade

[@sheemasiddique5121]

Wade is lieing

[@seonggihun5069]

You think victims of child sexual abuse should be arrested? We live in different worlds because I think that paedophiles should be arrested

[@GuillermoMajores]

@@seonggihun5069 ...if you believe that, then clearly Wade should be: kzbin.info/www/bejne/noWZZYWaibZroKs (..did you catch the 'UNDERAGE' part? 4 seconds into the clip)

[@GreenEyedChaos]

“They have no financial interest... past, present or future” ... didn’t they just try and sue the estate for $1B?

[@Illustraful]

The victims of Catholic priests also sue for compensation. Are they lying too?

[@GreenEyedChaos]

Illustraful if the Catholic priest was investigated by the FBI, was a victim of previous proven extortion, and was vindicated on all charges against him, I’d say all arrows point to yes 🙄 But you’re missing the point, why did he feel the need to say that when it wasn’t true?

[@Illustraful]

If you think there's nothing suspicious about a grown adult sharing his bed with boys not related to him, then go to a neighbour and ask if you can sleep in the same bed as their kids.

[@GreenEyedChaos]

Illustraful yeah he wasn’t exactly your next door neighbour though was he? He literally had NO experience of normal social situations. Also, if he was doing that to groom and rape young boys... why would he voluntarily admit it to the whole world?....

[@michaelfan86]

Illustraful and by the way Michael has stated he slept on the floor while the kids slept in the bed. And every time he asked the children to ask the parents for permission. He has also stated that every time they were in their own rooms they almost always wanted to be near Michael. Now what crime was committed when a child wants to be near the adult???? Where is this manipulative lie you’ve suddenly told yourself come from? Maybe you need some help.

[@thedestinefamily9075]

he said none of the Jackson family members were there. Mr DAN REED were you there???????? Were you???????

[@sussh9635]

Right?! Their wives, moms and siblings weren't in the room either so with Dan Greed's logic, why are they in the documentary. They weren't in the room!! Still they had a lot of BS to talk about but the Jackson's were excluded because they were not in the room. 🙄

[@CATSWITHKYLA]

Right!! Wtf ughhh

[@mistyh9403]

Dan Reed is trying to reach out and help other abuse victims. Many comments on youtube prove it is difficult to come out and tell their story. Poor kids

[@mistyh9403]

@@sussh9635 so they all lied?? MJ family are all innocent no abuse?? Wrong..we know Joe was abusive and MJs mum let that happen!!

[@mistyh9403]

Yes I agree with you!! Joe and his wife were abusers and let abuse happen to their kids!! @Suss H

[@Edgar_Vira]

"This isn't a film about Michael Jackson." Well, when you accuse Michael of molesting a child, it kind of is a film about him...

[@user-bj8wb1rb7q]

Michael is long gone yet the scars of abuse he left behind on his countless victims are still here and very real.

[@kylealexander1514]

@Mike Tati Forever you know that? I think to call a potential victim a liar, when you have no factual basis, is incredibly reckless.

[@grammarofficerkrupke4398]

@@kylealexander1514 Michael is the victim here and he's not even alive to defend himself.

[@TheNr1Tant]

Yeah, like anyone would watch this if Wade and James had accused just any random dance teatcher...

[@xenofastiq]

@@kylealexander1514 Choosing to believe accusers who have records of repeatedly changing their stories over the years, and have especially changed stories in courts countless times, is absolutely ridiculous. It's also quite convenient how when he's suddenly getting to a low point in his life, he's wanting to "tell his story" so he gets support to get his life back together. There are almost no facts to support these works of fiction from the two accusers.

[@gemineye523]

The director said any Jackson family member that knew Wade or James should come forward. Wade's ex girlfriend of 7 years Brandi Jackson (who is MJ's niece) came forward but of course no one is really giving her the time of day.

[@niroshrathod9045]

He said any family member that knew of the abuse, not any family member who knew Wade or James.

[@GuillermoMajores]

@@niroshrathod9045 Either way - Dan Reed's is either **definitively** a liar, or simply ignorant/incompetent: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gIHEnJumZ5mjhJY

[@globalcitizenn]

@@niroshrathod9045 There was no abuse to “know of”

[@aniapietruszczak9684]

She was his gfnd but it doesnt mean that M didnt abuse him

[@AurianWarriorOfDarkness]

@@aniapietruszczak9684 She was with wade for nearly 10 years since they were children till teens until Wade cheated on her with Britney does that sound incredibly sus to you plus Wade asked MJ to bring them together in the first place

[@kubanieten]

the Robson Safechuck court case was not thrown out of court for statue of limitations, it was thrown out because the stories were unbelievable. as the judge put it there were “contradictory”.

[@firenze5555]

You are wrong. Their stories were credible, it was that the statute of limitations had run out.

[@everything483]

@@firenze5555 how can it can be credible When their lying under oath is taken in account.

[@richardkovacs2006]

@@firenze5555 Which of their many stories do you think is credible? The one they kept telling between 1993 and 2013, even under oath? Or the one when they said MJ called it "love"? Or when they said MJ called what they accuse him of doing "dirty stuff", not love? Etc etc, Which one? Or you think you can freely chose the version that best fits your agenda? Sure. Serial liars are the most credible sources. Esp when NOTHING backs up their story.

[@cecilyworley8424]

That's just a lie. You can literally find transcripts online. The judge NEVER ruled on the veracity or credibility of their claims. To claim otherwise makes you a liar, plain and simple.

[@cecilyworley8424]

I understand the question about Wade's credibility but people keep trying to lump James in with him and that's just not being honest in the slightest. I am much more skeptical of Wade than James.

[@sarahjeffery9867]

4:33 that face says i don't believe your damn lies 😂😂

[@djarthounahmed3259]

😂I cried I wasn't at ready to see that 😂 oh God.

[@a.k.a.theruggedmanchild9685]

you mean that fetus face

[@messycritic7425]

😂🤣🤣🤣

[@luishern1309]

FBI investigates him too and never any evidence.

[@trobical86]

they investigated poor MJ for at least 6 years ...raided his home twice.... and found nothing .. it was many law enforcement entities cooperating against Michael Jackson

[@obaasan_loves_cebek]

@@trobical86 correction almost 10 years

[@obaasan_loves_cebek]

@johnny67448 it was between 1993 and 2005 and they sometimes raided him unexpectedly so it doesn't matter how long it was HE'S INNOCENT

[@kylealexander1514]

Yes they did

[@AT-cy7im]

oh the FBI found plenty of evidence, but never revealed because of "classified type material" documents only have becaome partly available after MJ's death so they really can't be used. No solid evidence could be used in court either. Jackson had everyone that stayed with him sign Non disclosures, if staff or anyone under such a contract, not only cannot testify against him, but they themselves would be brought to court and made to pay heafty damages. No wonder hardly anyone dared to speak against him Jackson was a BAD man and a Smooth Criminal, he told us himself this.

[@Catsandgraffiti]

It's crazy how many people are blind to this issue. It's pretty effed up.

[@gavinpowers1217]

Had the same here in the UK with Jimmy Savile and Rolf Harris. A childhood hero must be celebrated as a hero. Immune to any criticism. Sadly, if they f**k up, it's often the fans who are 'bad' for calling them out.

[@abbattle345]

Have you looked this up besides watching a one-sided documentary?

[@jedellie9555]

It’s different when there was literally a 10 year investigation by the FBI, against him.

[@presidentkennedy8971]

Kelly Sloan And its crazy how people are siding with these men by only words ita crazy how they both say its not about money but yet suing mj its crazy how people are not doing any research in any of mj past cases its crazy how wade robinson was dating mj niece and michael was the one who hooked them up but he was being molested its crazy how people are choosing words over evidence proof facts and a 10 to 13 years fbi investigation you wanna talk about crazy if you ask me thats insane and yet yall still believe he did it

[@AbbasKhan9364]

Oh, and you're so "woke" by an obvious, one-sided documentary. Give me a break.

[@shokoohmansouri9311]

He lost all of his hair by trying to research on Michael Jackson.

[@rob16248]

Well, Michael Jackson lost his hair trying to do a Pepsi commercial.

[@nilovabose170]

@@rob16248 Not all of it, unlike egghead here.

[@tae.london6263]

🤣🤣🤣

[@globalcitizenn]

Ron P he was not bald. He had a moderate scar & spotty hair loss from Lupus.

[@abelzeray1486]

i dont Think this guy care about Child abuse or pedofil he is doing Money snake

[@jerrydales721]

That's my egg head

[@hatenation4064]

Typical MJ fan. No brain cells whatsoever.

[@dinabowing4963]

@@hatenation4064 It's not about Michael Jackson it's also about justice. There are right now 30 lies from Safechuck and Robson. I think it's really bad to make up such a horrible story about someone who is dead, just to get money from Michaels inheritance. Reed knows everything better than the judges, FBI, law enforcement, police, the American Legal system. Michael was acquitted innocent. Safechuck and Robson told already so many proven lies. They fooled the audience with intention, treated people like idiots. As if no one has access to the court documents and legal documents. They are caught up in their stupid lies. Like the train station that didn't exist, the stupid wedding took place in an amusement park in Paris that wasn't even built, he was abused in New York at the Grammys when Michael was on tour and the Grammys were in Los Angeles. His mother danced when she heard the Michael was dead, although Safechuck didn't tell her he was abused, Robson was Michael Jackson niece's girlfriend, she was in the same Room, Robson mother said in an interview they saw Michael only 3 times in the first years, Robson cheated on Brandi and lied to her, he wanted his wedding on Neverland ......on and on and on. If you have a little bit of brain left how come you believe people who are notorious liars! They have to apologize to the public!

[@jerrydales721]

Hate Nation should I show you the real facts and proofs then maybe you will know who has brain cells and who doesn't. Cuz just by watching a one sided mockumentary you claim a man to be guilty instead of seeing all the statements of the judge , officers and jury members . What has happened to people's logic😕😟

[@longnights5945]

Dina Boehnig No.

[@rasheed9705]

When you look at the allegations, try rationalizing the claims with evidence. Takes James Safechucks claims, for example: 1. Safechuck claims he was abused from '88-92 (until the age of 14). I, the "Honeymoon stage" (the beginning), he was repeatedly taken to the second floor of the train station to be abused. ---> The train station was built in 1994 (construction began Q4 93) 2. Safechuck claims he was flown to NYC as MJ was there to perform at the 1989 Grammy's and was abused on that trip. ---> The 89 Grammy's were not in NYC, nor did MJ attend or perform.

[@hellokittyprincess8172]

"this documentary isnt about Micheal Jackson it's about 2 little boys who go to Neverland" REALLY dude?

[@AnotherPart0fMe]

Exactly. It's not about Michael and he doesn't characterize Michael. Just like I'm not characterizing him (Dan Reed) when I call him a filthy, opportunistic evil bottom feeder.

[@MJQueenForever]

The Lost Boys? 😂😂😂

[@pkmntrainerdee6153]

He's lying, it's all over his face!

[@michaelfiordimondo3591]

Yes really

[@MJQueenForever]

@@michaelfiordimondo3591 Agree TOTALLY!

[@clintongwanyama7188]

They should have come out when he was alive, dead men can’t talk

[@AdrianSLorio]

They want money so bad

[@annlanders978]

Obviously if he was alive there would be no "documentary".

[@dianakulicoff9626]

When he was alive there was a trial back in 2005 and these same guys testified under oath saying Jackson never ever touched them or did anything inappropriate to them ! And other people like the stupid maid were also testified against Michael and the juries didn’t buy their stories ! Money , money , money

[@rob16248]

That wasn't a man, that was a castrato.

[@rob16248]

Yunggin Queen - He walked out of that court because money bought his "innocence".

[@michaelleslie6992]

Stop saying he denied them. It was proven that he didn’t by the courts and THE FBI

[@xFloortje]

@John Whirling A LOT of evidence was found, but a jury didn't think he was guilty. That does NOT prove that he was innocent, it proves that the jury didn't find the evidence substantial enough.

[@TheMasterReaper]

@@xFloortje Literally zero evidence was found, the drawings didn't match, there was no CP like the "victims" claim.

[@shxkenup7041]

I heard James lied about the train station. It didn't even exist yet. Didn't exist like their stories lmaoo.

[@saltychips4866]

In the book written by MJ's bodyguards; Bill Whitfield & Javon Beard written in 1990, they wrote: Neverland visitors entered the ranch @ the train station boarding a steam engine that took them up to the house. Author, Randall Sullivan wrote in his book (also written in 1990): they climbed a hill out back that led to a near replica of the Main Street station at Disneyland. Both of these confirm Safechuck's account.

[@sussh9635]

@@saltychips4866 Watch video footage of Neverland and you'll see with your own eyes that the train station didn't exist before 1994.

[@sussh9635]

@@saltychips4866 " Now a professional aerial picture, licensed by Getty Images, of the ranch proves that the building did not exist in August 1993. This comes after two different accounts appeared to claim that the train station opened in 1990. Jackson biographer Mike Smallcombe has debunked the claims of the star’s bodyguards Bill Whitfield and Javon Beard as well as author Randall Sullivan. In Sullivan’s book Untouchable: The Strange Life and Tragic Death of Michael Jackson, he includes the train station in his description of the ranch during its public opening in 1990. PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE However, Smallcombe points out the book states that it uses a 2003 sheriff’s department video as a source for its description of the ranch. He said: “While there was a public opening of sorts at Neverland in 1990, the train station had not yet opened. “In fact, half of what became Neverland hadn’t been built, including much of the amusement park. “Randall Sullivan’s book mentions that the train station was there in 1990 at that press gathering. “He also mentions many other things being there then which weren’t, like the Zipper rollercoaster, which was approved in August 1991, and the bumper car arena, which was approved in December 1993, as was the high slide. “So while Sullivan mentioned all these things being there at the time of that 1990 opening, they weren’t. “The explanation for this is simple - Sullivan states in his source notes at the back of his book that his description of what Neverland might have looked like to visitors in 1990 was in fact based on a 2003 sheriff’s department video, taken during a raid of Neverland.” Smallcome points out that Santa Barbara County permits prove that construction on the train station was approved in September 1993 before the building opened in mid-1994. Speaking about the aerial picture, he said: “There is a picture on Getty Images, taken on August 25, 1993 by photographer Steven Starr, which shows that work on the station hadn’t even started on that date. “There’s nothing there, except the floral clock.” The Jackson defender also points that the bodyguards Bill Whitfield and Javon Beard did not start working for the eccentric entertainer until the mid-2000s. Smallcombe said: ““Their book ‘Remember The Time’ was a collaboration with a ghost writer named Tanner Colby. “That ghost writer, like Sullivan, said Neverland opened to the public in 1990. The difference is, he did not say the train station was there that year. “The train station is not mentioned until a few paragraphs later. “The book merely states, ‘Neverland’s visitors entered the ranch at its train station’. “This is a general remark, which has nothing to do with the public opening in 1990, mentioned much further up the page.” " The Sun By Mark Hodge 10th April 2019

[@vineetasjourney8017]

Salty Chips the actual building plan by the council have been released it’s confirmed that the train stations construction was completed in 1994

[@TremanFamily]

5:36 OWNED. Thank you for this question, brings to light Dan Reeds willful ignorance in creating this documentary. Glad they kept pushing the point. CBS is getting better each interview.

[@ZoeIpfilms]

100% agree! he stuttered and said he believes that the Jackson family has no knowledge, but how does he know they have no knowledge of that? its because he only did 3 weeks research and didn't bother contacting them about information allowing them to speak from their point of view.

[@shibachaleshgar4037]

The “documentary” is so painfully fake. It amazes me how so many people believe this BS. Leave MJ alone, he suffered enough during his lifetime. This is torture for his kids...

[@justaguy6903]

Yes!! Exactly

[@jjoycetgutierez9994]

the documentary is sexual and harrasment report it

[@SusanLynn656]

@@jjoycetgutierez9994😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@benscr]

Dan Reed says Wade Robson and James Safechuck have never had interest in money, before or after his documentary. Yet they have both tried and failed to sue Michael Jackson’s Estate. Their allegations weren’t just thrown out because of the ‘Statute of Limitations’, but also because the judge said their allegations were inconsistent and unbelievable. As both Wade Robson and James Safechuck keep changing their story. Dan Reed looks nervous and shifty in this interview. His answers have no depth, and I don’t think the interviewers like him or believe what he says.

[@globalcitizenn]

OMR Judge did say that since Wade had so blatantly lied under oath about not knowing of the existence of the Estate, nothing he said could be believed.

[@AdrianSLorio]

@@RPMcM09 judge did day that. They where caught lying multiple times in there own lawsuite and there case was throwned out of court.

[@dinabowing4963]

@@RPMcM09 No you are wrong, they both had no credibility. They were caught lying.

[@sarathnandakumar9639]

They look disgusted with him . I bet the whole room stank

[@garyography]

Dan Reed does look nervous, look at his armpits, that shirt is wet through

[@dianachando]

I don’t even know why he is still talking. Sue his entire career on being a director shameless

[@DJ_Kane1224]

Don’t you guys think it’s weird how Michael would hold kid’s hands and talk about sleeping in the same bed with them? I don’t want to believe this. But doesn’t that behavior seem kind of obvious

[@levishakur]

@@DJ_Kane1224 It does sound weird, but we all know Michael was a very odd person.

[@BB-se9bl]

Dan Reed is a very respected documentary maker in the business for over 3 decades.

[@meandujcko3420]

If you realize correctly ... "Nobody was in the room" and you come by as Dan Reed and assumes 100% abuse! Then there is always the possibility of a 100% lie, too!

[@ferodrigues1211]

If it were some other man who walked hand in hand with little boys and slept in the same bed with them and had a house in the middle of nowhere full of things that attract children, you could guess what he wants ... but because it is Michael Jackson no one wants to believe it. Still.

[@Kellster45]

Felipe Rodrigues it’s because idiots like you believe a scripted documentary that had no real evidence. Michael was found not guilty and they even searched his home and found nothing. But you believe to liars that have changed their story multiple times

[@Niinunnu22]

@@Kellster45 i think its very clear, who is showing to be the idiot here.

[@GuillermoMajores]

@@Kellster45 Regarding what you said - people/everyone is presumed **innocent** until proven guilty. 2005 proved Jackson wasn't guilty - in other words he was innocent... But then we have people like Missy/Felipe who want to argue because of propaganda.

[@GuillermoMajores]

@@ferodrigues1211 According to the news - these accusers lied and got caught: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gmLHhph7YshqiZI ...& Dan Reed's lied and got caught: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gIHEnJumZ5mjhJY ...Chandler clearly wasn't telling the truth: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gIHEnJumZ5mjhJY ...Arvizo **proved** Jackson to be innocent. Everything you said is pure propaganda. Demonstrable propaganda.

[@2234045]

I'm not a Michael Jackson "superfan" by any and will not defend him blindly but I must say the more and more i looked into safechuck and Robson the more I firmly believe Jackson is not guilty of any these allegations! Robson in particular has made so many contradictory and false statements in the past that he will get ripped to shreds in a court of law! You've got to remember these guys are saying that there is no financial incentive whatsoever behind these abuse claims but why then are they both in the process of sueing the Michael Jackson Estate to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars? I'm looking forward to actually seeing wether or not Robson and safechucks testimonies hold up in a court of law!

[@tulayamalavenapi4028]

The most compelling suit to date is the Estate of Michael Jackson against HBO. When MJ legally owns any production, and therefore owns LN, it will not be aired. Italy has already refused to show it no matter what. They know it is a one-sided load of trash.

[@lelelew2735]

In my opinion even outside the facts and just the extra details point of view it doesn't make sense... Like when he was alive all of the media was one sided ready to crucify him no matter what now that he's dead all of a sudden they are open minded and looking at both sides -_- that makes me think before it was a witch hunt to make mj look bad, they wanted him to be taken down now that he is taken down and everybody but mjs family has his money now they want to use logic. He's not here anymore to put secret messages in his songs or to be half owner of sony,or to buy Marvel. So the attack against him is called off

[@AurianWarriorOfDarkness]

They were trying to go for 1.5 Billions

[@eminosose]

Why were parents leaving their kids (keyword “their”) with Michael Jackson??? Was he a certified/qualified nanny, carer or babysitter??? Being famous is not enough validity. To be honest they left their kids with a stranger. If this really happened they should be charged with neglect!!!

[@alev4287]

Have you seen the documentary? When you watch it, I realized the reasons that must have been going through those mother's heads. We need to put ourselves in other people's shoes.

[@wmbpounder6840]

This isn’t something that happened over night. Mike groomed them boys and the parents to do this. It’s what pervs do.

[@brokenbutterfly3178]

It's Michael Jackson. The greatest entertainer of all time. Stop trying to pretend that given the opportunity, you wouldn't do the same.

[@adamray8371]

@@brokenbutterfly3178 If I knew a famous entertainer I might want to be friends with him, but if he as an adult finds my children more interesting than me and wants to sleep in the same bed as them, no, there's no way. That's a red flag if there ever was one. There's somethings money can't buy.

[@brocanujustbenicepls2944]

He was a family friend and the parents were *always* there. Michael didn’t let them stay without their parents being present.

[@angelaizzo641]

I like the male reporter, you could tell he's on Michael's side

[@MoosieBerry]

Yea. Disgusting

[@JayKlassGeneral]

No he was been a journalist. To ask questions and demand answers

[@brocanujustbenicepls2944]

Same

[@alicepaz8022]

Jami Sade like you.

[@michaelleslie6992]

If this was a documentary about leaving Graceland or about the leaving Catholic Church it would be pulled instantly

[@Aikyiomi]

Exactly.👏👊👌

[@VImongoose]

your absolutely right..

[@LadyCharity]

FACTS!!!!!!!

[@jjames4835]

HBO has shown several docs about sexual abuse in the Catholic Church

[@jjames4835]

Mea maxima culpa

[@ahrvolabs]

"The FBI, likewise, conducted a thorough investigation. Its 300-page file on the pop star, released under the Freedom of Information Act, found no evidence of wrongdoing."

[@testaccount01336]

and remember ZIMMERMAN is innocent!!!

[@g.l.shamir2629]

That’s true

[@mike309saa]

U know I read that it actually contained around 600 pages but only 300 odd pages where released to the public bit odd that..

[@ahrvolabs]

@@mike309saa not true. documents get redacted all the time

[@RenegadePyro]

Yea.....its crazy what millions of dollars in defense attorneys can do. Just like OJ Simpson...LOL

[@mosesberkowitz3298]

I'm glad John Dickerson and the others asked this guy some tough questions (which he didn't really answer). I won't be watching this exploitative "documentary".

[@sarathnandakumar9639]

I didn't watch the interview , can't stand his voice. Came here to dislike. Anyway. What were those questions ?

[@hiromamoru9144]

Nor will I

[@mosesberkowitz3298]

@@sarathnandakumar9639 They asked why MJ's family or MJ's lawyers weren't contacted to contribute to this movie-- 3:30 -- So the director says "This movie isn't about Micheal Jackson, its about the two boys..." Then John Dickerson follows up and says "You can't get answers if you don't ask questions..." And the director just mumbles....

[@mosesberkowitz3298]

@@RPMcM09 I feel like I've seen it already....the only difference is this one will be more explicit. Let the dead stay dead.

[@jcdx87]

He doesn't want to put them in the documentary because it would change the narrative

[@sophieatkigggvnson7917]

Oh please, they were too scared to do it when he was alive so when he died they grabbed the opportunity to make some $ because they know they could easily get away with it and "describe" horrific details that people would believe and feel bad for them.

[@previll]

EXACTLY

[@bunnyfreakz]

Make documentary about Harvey dude? It's already proven guilty.

[@honestperson6280]

bunnyfreakz Or Kevin Spacey, Bryan Singer and Elton John!

[@Christopher_Smiley]

So what's the point then? It's already known... This film has a purpose to get the truth out

[@tushararaghavan9565]

This is a cover up, talk of the Town story to cloud the release of Harvey movie realsed simiultaneosly.

[@TheNerdMan2]

Even better Roman Polanski

[@gigiarmany4332]

they were not little children, but grown up women trying to make Hollywood careers..totally different..smh!!!!

[@sussh9635]

Schmuck is bitter because MJ didn't make him rich and famous. It's not MJ's fault that he didn't make it in the entertainment industry. He didn't know that he was molested until Robbingson contacted him. Robbingson is bitter because he didn't get the Cirque Du Soleil gig. This is their revenge. It's all about the love of money.

[@sussh9635]

@@RPMcM09 Those two FAKE victims manipulate and disrespect TRUE victims. Unfortunately TRUE victims get emotionally triggered by their FAKE story.

[@sussh9635]

@REGIMENT65 Stop defending FAKE VICTIMS!

[@jereniahbullock8437]

Who you trying to fool you're not fooling us might be fooling people on TV are you not for us this is for the money you're lying on TV is what people watch the show you can stop loving Michael Jackson Michael Jackson live on forever

[@tomandre3023]

It baffles me that Dan Reed apparently is a professional when it comes to pedophilia, but last time I checked he was only a director and producer. They say they don't do this for money, but to put a light on sexual abuse and those kind of horrific events. However, when checking Dan Reed's twitter and interviews - he's always talking about Michael Jackson and how he did this or that - rather than bringing awareness into the matter of issue that the "documentary" supposedly is about. This man is a joke to journalism. He's put together a one-sided film to torment and rip up the legacy of Michael Jackson - not to raise awareness of child abuse. He should be ashamed. There's not much to say other than the fact that FBI found nothing on Michael Jackson. And the fact that Wade Robson and Safechuck have been proved to lie several times since 2011. It doesn't take much time to debunk the material in "Leaving Neverland" on your own.

[@AnotherPart0fMe]

If he really wanted to help actual victims of child abuse, he wouldn't make a "documentary" that he knows damn well is going to cause a backlash and lots of questioning about the credibility of these accusers. That is the very reason real victims don't want to come forward. He's perpetuating that. This is all about obscuring the rampant sexual abuse and pedophilia in Hollywood. And money, of course. And if he can get credit for assassinating Michael Jackson's legacy, he'll take that too.

[@RikiNewtonMusicianSongwriter]

Tom André Excellently worded comment Tom - all you say is true and righteous - nice one dude. Rx

[@weAllNeedOne]

last time I checked I never heard of this ugly guy before the fantasy movie

[@Jimmymatthewb]

@@AnotherPart0fMe That literally makes no sense. You're saying people don't want to come forward because of backlash. YOU people are the ones providing the backlash. I mean really.

[@AnotherPart0fMe]

@@endlesspoetry5411 He's in to money all right, but his agenda is obvious. He smugly tries to pass off these lies as facts and acts like people who question anything about his one-sided hit piece are the crazy ones. He's lying right along with them. Just like Oprah. He knows about filmmaking and knows this is no documentary. His agenda is clear in this excerpt from a USA Today article: Dan Reed, 54, the British director of the film, has led the campaign to promote and defend the film. In an interview with New York magazine's Vulture column last month, he said he made the film because there was already a question at large in the culture about Jackson's behavior. "And I think we’ve delivered the answer to that question," Reed said. "Why are people so interested in the truth about what this man did in the late ’80s and early ’90s? I think it’s because of his presence in the fabric of American life and people’s lives worldwide, the fact that he means something to people." "And the meaning of that thing is going to change, and we’re attempting to change it." Reed declined to be interviewed by USA TODAY.

[@martymartin9186]

C'mon, why couldn't we hear the other stories of the kids who said he never touched them?

[@bradgaines]

Right on!

[@martymartin9186]

Piatequila theories???

[@mittao86]

@Piatequila And how do you know those two kids didn lie? Do you believe the word of 2 kid instead of 7?

[@vegetalover1009]

jaja oh so now we’re just gonna assume all sexual abuse victims are lying

[@nickyholdgate7560]

i will always believe in MJ and will never stop playing his music

[@sofialavish1072]

I am always with MJ I believe him not even for r 1 sec I had any doubts about him.

[@dannywilson1743]

@@21April853BC there's no proof of him being a pedophile

[@rasheed9705]

@@21April853BC what a intellegent comment.. smh! Pick up a book

[@Baron1497]

And that's exactly why you wont entertain the idea that he did it. Because then you have to admit to yourself that you enjoy the music of a child molester

[@rasheed9705]

@@IrishScribbler pick up a book.. maybe even an article, here's one to start: mjjforum.com/site/in-justice-truth-runs-marathons/

[@branddork3180]

The film isnt about Micheal (name of the film "Leaving Neverland") no one would care if it wasnt about MICHAEL. For him to pretend that it isnt about Michael is crazy. He says they included his defense, the glaring issue is those defenses dont speak to their claims making them moot. He says he didnt speak to the family because they werent there yet the parent werent there when the "rape" happened so why include them? For emotional value. This dude is strange and uses double speak. He himself was not there, so if thats his basis why is he speaking on it while feeling the FAMILY of the accused has no place? This man is a fraud.

[@Lightemerging]

Absolutely!!!

[@andreasleonlandgren3092]

Brand Dork well said

[@AWAS-ps8sr]

Big time!!!!

[@branddork3180]

@Marquessa du Bois Im not disagreeing with that, the issue, that you didn't address is why not just tackle that topic of pedophilia? Why center it around Michael and conflate and flat out lie to do so? Why make the claim it (this film) isn't about what it clearly is about. Michael, who (these men claim) is a pedophile. You don't get to make a film on someone claim you didn't and then smear them under the guise of being informative to the topic in general. Double speak and non-sense. They could've made the same point without making it about Michael which it was.

[@andreasleonlandgren3092]

Brand Dork exactly he has no ground for these acussations being documented at all.

[@jdaradara9483]

So are we going to ignore the fact that Wade lied under oath in 2005? Isn’t that an offense?

[@moishe43]

I don't necessarily think they are telling the truth, but this does not discount his story. Read into molestation and how children react before posting something ignorant like this.

[@ancamarialacatusu7938]

@@moishe43 excuse me.. children? at 23 years old?

[@moishe43]

@@ancamarialacatusu7938 they were CHILDREN when the supposed sexual abuse happened. Their response is not abnormal to other adults reacting to their abuse. I am not saying I believe them, but their stories are in line with other adults recollecting their abuse.

[@ancamarialacatusu7938]

@@moishe43 in reply to JDara #So are we going to ignore the fact that Wade lied under oath in 2005? He was no child.. and neither in 2009 when their "agressor" died. what is their excuse for not saying anything then? I don't know what to believe, but their allegations seem too far stretched

[@moishe43]

@@ancamarialacatusu7938 I am not going into a discussion about whether Wade lied or not. I am not on any side of the argument. If you take other factors into the mix, there are a multitude of opinions. I merely state that their lack of saying anything before this is in keeping with child abuse and the ridiculous argument 'they never said anything until now', is therefore irrelevant. This doesn't mean I believe them. But other, more convincing arguments need to be given. Also, to claim he was 'no child' is irrelevant. He was a child at the time of the supposed abuse and is looking back to the trauma he supposedly suffered.

[@shaneburrows316]

Dan Reed is the modern day Tom Sneddon. Evil and has an vendetta against Michael Jackson. 🤬

[@errolflynn610]

Dan Reed looks like a creep

[@kingbuream218hh8]

John Galt he is a devil

[@kingbuream218hh8]

YarbJohnCarpLips prove it

[@AprilGay]

He was pure evil...period.

[@shaneburrows316]

Little April who’s he?

[@Muhdah1972]

Dan Reed thought this was a big story in the world?! Michael Jackson passed away about a decade ago, these accusations haven't been out in the news for a while. I think Reed wanted to work on a subject that would guarantee attention to his project 👎

[@globalcitizenn]

Sakinah Abdussamad Attention is exactly what he wanted.

[@richardkovacs2006]

@@globalcitizenn and he got it

[@jkmdemon]

Facts don’t lie people do

[@rxtsec1]

Exactly facts that they defended michael and now that he cant give them money they sued

[@FishKing_SG3]

It's there word against his, there is no audio or visual recording evidence. And unfortunately michael is not here to defend himself.

[@einc70]

Facts: 100M court case sounds juicy.

[@krimsonedit3272]

molesters lie and pay off victims

[@trismurray]

...still waiting for those other ‘victims’ to come forward Dan.

[@idiosyncrazy1980]

Be patient, "truth runs marathons", but those fools chose to run the Self-Transcendence 3100 Miles Ultramarathon... in Moonwalk... é_è

[@amandaserle3343]

@@idiosyncrazy1980 hi Dan Reed is thinking of making a sequel to leaving neverland 🤣🤣😂😂😂is he completely off his bald head🌕🌕🌕🌕🤣😂🤣😂🙄🙄🙄The first 1 is full of lies, inconsistencies and contradictions 🤣🤣😂😂UK has made their own documentary proving them liars being aired next month I cannot wait🤓👍😎🇬🇧🇬🇧😂😂🤣🤣🤣😎🙏🙏😋

[@AtomSmash3r]

Still waiting...

[@ayofrtho7014]

@The Darkhorse Effect *TO HIM

[@juliana4521]

His armpit is so wet.are you nervous dan reed.you know what you did was absolutely wrong

[@waderobsonisaliar3415]

Never even heard of Dan reed before but it's clear he hasn't got a clue what he is talking about so maybe go back and do some actual real research.

[@ladylovelace501]

Wade Robsonisaliar - Dan Greed said he never even heard of the case with Jordan Chandler. He just lies

[@karnhall]

Instead of the spotlight on a guy who is deceased, let’s go after the guys who are still alive. Cory Feldman has repeated emphatically that he has a list of names of sexual abusers who are still alive yet nobody seems interested. What’s gives? 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@Bamgeutcutiepie]

exactly!!

[@PrithviVc]

easier to go after a dead man who can't defend himself, I suppose 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@hillarymodem3151]

Karn Hall He said it’s in his book I believe and he just said last week that after watching leaving neverland, that he could no longer defend MJ, after he’s defending him all these years!

[@missgigip]

Hillary Modem and the reason is because he himself is a victim and is doing a documentary himself..he still maintains MJ did nothing to him and that wasn’t his experience

[@hillarymodem3151]

missgigi I agree with u, I never said he did abuse Corey, but has been seen in court and all the times in interviews, that he didn’t believe MJ hurt any children and was completely innocent! Now after watching the documentary , he said he could no longer defend somebody that could do those disrespectful things to children

[@ndoto9]

Wow literally not one person in the comments believes what tweedle di and tweedle dum are selling. Kinda makes me very proud

[@keishawilliams9056]

ndoto9 me too. Glad to see people have researched this 25 year witch hunt on MJ and researched the background of these two accusers who defended him for 20 years until they became broke and needed a job so decided to ‘realize’ abuse and sue MJ’s estate for hundreds of millions of dollars. Their lawsuit was tossed out of court by the way. They are currently trying to appeal the verdict.

[@charismaticjackson]

Michael Jackson is smooth but not a criminal ..

[@chrissiem4]

I am no Jackson fan but I can sense that this director is an opportunist, riding on the wave of the #metoo movement to get known. How can he say that the film is not about Michael Jackson when it totally is? And by saying that he just based his film with all the facts that was investigated for 3 weeks and from old clippings of what Michael said ... hmmm. but isn't it so easy to do a lot of editing just to make everything look sinister? I'd do my own research and not just take what this film is conveying line hook and sinker. The documentary is so one sided. CBS should do an interview with Brandi Jackson, Jackson's niece who claims to have been introduced and set up by Michael with Wade to date when they were kids and they had a 7 year relationship. Wade never mentioned her in his interviews. I think that relationship is very crucial.

[@KarmaKahn]

Indeed. At first I wasn't sure what to make of this documentary, then took a look at his twitter and there was no question. He's basically the journalist equivalent of an ambulance chaser. He retweets just about every tabloid piece that mentions Michael Jackson. When Barbara Streisand had a foot in mouth moment when asked about these new allegations, he of course retweeted that 6-7 times over, just so he could vilify her as well. Now, he's even talking about making a sequel! Dan Reed is one sick individual.

[@chrissiem4]

@@KarmaKahn I think he is obsessed with MJ lol! I think he has a lot to gain from this coz he was an unknown before but now he is notoriously known because of Michael. I've now come to the conclusion that these three are indeed the opportunists in this situation.

[@957543]

also he said the two guys have no financial benefit but then at the end says he found them cause they were seeking litigation assumingly to get money... and this documentary is gonna convict him in the eyes of the public...

[@sarathnandakumar9639]

Yeah right , Wade was in love with Mike when he was a kid. Actually he was dating Brandi Jackson at that time. But seriously , this Dan Reed guy looks creepy. Almost voldemortish.

[@blessedhighlyfavored3847]

Sarath Nandakumar who is Brandi?

[@makesense9927]

@@blessedhighlyfavored3847 Michael Js niece, he introduced them. Google what she has to say about her ex

[@Niinunnu22]

@@makesense9927 he was dating her when he was older. Not during the time he claims michael abused him. At least state your facts right.

[@discobroccoli198]

@@Niinunnu22 Nope. That’s wrong. They were “dating” since they were kids. Michael introduced them to each other and they were together ever since.

[@haroldneufville4244]

It's really amazing that anyone can say anything about anybody and just get away with it.

[@chancelleflorencenzangngom5760]

Not only amazing, it's scary too.

[@AFRoSHEENT3ARCMICHAEL69]

You mean like free speech?

[@mjmedia09returns]

@@AFRoSHEENT3ARCMICHAEL69 Free speech when you are caught in LIES? I think if they start sending these people to jail for making FALSE allegations, it will stop this nonsense.

[@jamesstewart8377]

Say anything? He was investigated multiple times and indicted multiple times. Just because he wasn’t found guilty does not mean the accusations had no validity. All it means is the man had the money to get a legal team that was unbeatable. Which did not surprise anybody.

[@shenelldixon-transformyour4237]

If you lie once you would lie again

[@MoosieBerry]

Clearly you don’t know anything about sexual abuse

[@TheGamersGuide819]

Shenell Dixon you lie all the time ?

[@sammyarriba8929]

You have clearly never lied in your life

[@farrypro]

Fact

[@moishe43]

Not when it comes to sexual abuse.

[@myelocake7]

Now you are changing your story, how can you be trust you are telling the truh now...???

[@ikiniuhulu]

Im so sick of these people. Put them in jail already

[@sandraopi5489]

😂😂😂 well said

[@amandaserle3343]

@@sandraopi5489 hi Dan Reed is thinking of making a sequel to leaving neverland 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂🌕🌕is he completely off his bald head 🌕🌕🌕🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😁🤓🤓💜They are going down, UK has made a documentary being aired next month proving them liars 👍😎😎😎💪💪💪🙏🙏🙏🙏💜

[@firenze5555]

I agree, but it is too late for the king of pedos MJ to go to jail.

[@amandaserle3343]

@@firenze5555 your are one of the pathetic media driven people🙄🙄I can tell, oh dear🙄you people are absolute idiots, the mind boggles🤣🤣😂😂😂🤪🙄🙄👍😎

[@amandaserle3343]

@@firenze5555 Michael Jackson was no pedophile he was the only victim all along but you people are too stupid to see it🙄🙄🙄and 'hey'!!! Mj died 10 years ago🙄🙄🤔🤔this should not be happening, these jerks and their stupid mothers are liars 100 percent, and are all in on it together, hope they get jail and not 1 cent😎👍👌😎

[@moonwalkerforlife6899]

For real now, these 3 guys need to face court for slandering MJ

[@djjameshayes9766]

60 proven lies later & this liar is still defending his mockumentry 🙄

[@starchild1595]

“Did my research.” Obviously he didn’t do any research when the two men he’s working with have literally been proven liars. This is so sad. To bring this back into the headlines and to talk of Michael as if he was some monster when he was proven innocent multiple times. He’s not here with us to defend himself and that’s what’s heartbreaking about all this. These allegations will always haunt Michaels name and there will always be someone ready to use it for a quick buck.

[@robertolecki7492]

1. He didn't say they weren't liars. 2. MJ wasn't "proven innocent multiple times" , 1st time there was financial settlement , 2nd time there wasn't enough evidence for the jury to prove him guilty, which basically means: "we don't know" 3. And trust me, to make a documentary you definately need to do a research, certainly more than you did by 15 minutes of searching on the Internet, kid

[@koopicaca7882]

@@robertolecki7492 I spent 5 damn years doing research and I’ve found nothing that makes him guilty.

[@Niinunnu22]

@@koopicaca7882 there is a word for that. Delusional

[@CousinPeaches]

@@robertolecki7492 ummm no. those are YOUR words “there wasn’t enough evidence to prove him guilty.” Michael was charged with 14 different charges, some of them misdemeanors with much lower thresholds for burden of proof and he wasn’t convicted of a single thing after 4 months of trial. If he was never found guilty of anything, then he is an innocent man. Also, a financial settlement isn’t proof of anything, especially guilt. The settlement agreement was for “negligence” NOT child molestation. It was specifically written into the settlement that the agreement was only reached as long as Michael admitted to no wrong doing. The family ONLY pursued a civil trial and refused to cooperate in a criminal trial. 2 grand juries declined to indict him based on a lack of evidence and they listened to over 400 witnesses called by the prosecution. 400 witnesses and STILL not enough evidence to even CHARGE him? that means zero evidence. zero evidence equal INNOCENT

[@robertolecki7492]

@@CousinPeaches I'll give him one accusation or even 2. But if he was accused so many times, there is clearly a pattern. I mean, would you honestly leave your child under his care? If it walks like a duck...

[@jasminegaspar8022]

Oh my god, the fact that CBS even has this man on here makes me sick 😷

[@goyerman]

They already testified under oath as adults as far as I'm concerned they had there chance to speak up and they voluntarily denied all of it. Now that Mike is dead and the money probably ended they wanna say something? Nah I'm good I'm not watching this

[@melgrant7404]

They were possibly threatened to testify for Michael.

[@daisy7066]

"Several nervous breakdowns?" So now he's mentally ill he's changed his story!?

[@theDavidChannel1]

This guy obviously has it out for Michael Jackson.

[@globalcitizenn]

He does

[@ancamarialacatusu7938]

he reminds me of tom sneddon.. that poor fool got himself shamed. can't wait for this other fool to face reality.

[@secretagent0280]

I actually don't think so. I think he has a warped view of life.

[@sarathnandakumar9639]

Of course he defends Leaving Neverland , its his pathetic creation after all.

[@tulayamalavenapi4028]

HBO IS IN VIOLATION NO MATTER WHAT, AND THE MJ ESTATE HAS FILED SUIT. Dan Reed is liable just as HBO is.

[@sarathnandakumar9639]

@@tulayamalavenapi4028 Why is HBO so adamant about this ? Judging by the trailer , the doc is a big fat joke. Those two can't even act properly.

[@CocoHornsby1864]

There's more hope to grow Reed's hair than his brain cell amount...

[@djarthounahmed3259]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I shouldn't laugh because of the subject that we are talking about, but i died, i'm sorry forgive me. You got me weak oh thank you 😂

[@kapy42]

😂😂😂

[@sideshowbob6416]

How about your brain cells. Or lack thereof. If you can't see that the dude was a kid touching freak then you're either blind or dumb

[@content4502]

Thanks troll.

[@brocanujustbenicepls2944]

I think they’re both near impossible

[@GQstyless]

He looks nervous... The police or FBI didnt find some DNA of wade in Michaels bed...

[@jayreagans1160]

He's sweating under his armpits if you look closely

[@MJQueenForever]

And talk about fidgety!

[@MJQueenForever]

Ok. Some shouldn't be allowed to type... or speak. Ugh. Absolute VULGARITY from such invertebrate jellies.

[@AtomSmash3r]

The two accusers are suing for millions and their narrative is not directly challenged in the film. Not sure that is fair.

[@raythelljordan6550]

Neither was R Kelly's side of the story told, But no one said it wasn't fair

[@TheHiphopgems]

I started laughing when this clown said the accusers had no monetary interest 😂😂😂

[@outb4thecount]

My main question was why not ask the other side? You don’t believe they have any direct knowledge? How do you know if you don’t ask? How about employees, extended family, someone who has no skin in the game? You could let your audience gauge what they were saying. This is not documentary in my opinion it is a one sided argument.

[@shadow.banned]

They refused to cooperate. And they threatened legal action against anyone even daring to publicly ask questions.

[@firenze5555]

This isn't an argument. This is a documentary from the victims' point of view to raise awareness on grooming and child abuse. We've had MJ's PR and "side of the story" for decades. They show in the documentary MJ's rebuttals at the time. Watch the entire documentary.

[@brandenstangle320]

They are just after money. They need to get over themselves. IF it were true, They need to concentrate on therapy and not on lining their pockets off the back of a deceased guy.

[@Lulu-hq8mx]

Is not normal that a grown man like to sleep with kids 🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏽‍♀️

[@mispelling]

That’s ignorance.

[@Kim-ed3mp]

Your mind is dirty

[@lopezfan24]

Eliesteth Rodriguez there is a literally a documentary from years ago where MJ says that he has slept with a young child. Those who keep saying that he is innocent are just bullshitting themselves

[@prometheus_ads]

@@lopezfan24sleeping in the same bed with a kid is not the same as molesting.

[@Archangel112]

I guy with arrested development, who was castrated at a young age

[@K1C2F3A4]

The real truth is out there for all : please do your home work research if you haven't already before you judge Michael : films are made to make the maker and his cast look and sound CONVINCING !!! I'm a mother of 3 against child abuse then am a fan of MJ I believe is innocence 100% .

[@inkyguy]

Describing yourself as a fan means that you really aren't willing or able to be objective about these or other allegations. You have to completely divorce and disassociate any admiration, pride or personal feelings about Jackson and approach this as if he were a man you've never heard of before.

[@thelovelymadamme7256]

@@inkyguy now that's difficult to do coz as fans we have done our research.

[@richardkovacs2006]

@@inkyguy being a fan doesn't mean you won't do a research or you can't think logically. It seems it's MJ NON-fans are the ones, who are incapable of research and think logically and without biase.

[@thelovelymadamme7256]

@@richardkovacs2006 exactly

[@Kareragirl]

@@richardkovacs2006 When you have affection for someone, you don't look at them objectively. It's scientifically proven. And you're even less objective when you have affection for and defend someone you have never, ever met in real life. He was a stranger to you.

[@safari4342]

Liars

[@safari4342]

@@RPMcM09 they are proven liars, they lied in their civil lawsuits with the estate multiple times.

[@lamaudelewis9866]

OMR In this case there are No victims

[@elizabethhenry6605]

@@lamaudelewis9866 Oh, really? Children groomed by a nonce and you think there are "no victims"?

[@faraimachakanja3247]

Elizabeth Henry we’re evidence to back that up

[@samwell2386]

Elizabeth Henry Evidence?

[@AlternativaRealidade]

"I did look throughout making the film, I looked for anything that could cast out or undermind Wade and Jame's story and I found nothing at all". I serched for 60 minutes and found more things than you did in 2 years. Let me help you: - Wade dated Brandi Jackson (MJ's niece) for over 7 years, during the period of accusations. Did you mention her in the documentary? I guess you just forgot. Or didn't know about this. How can you say you found nothing at all? If she was a part of Wade's life DURING the molestation, how come you don't even meet her and make some questions, even if you didn't include her testimony on the documentary? - Wade claims that he didn't knew he was molested until 2013. I wonder how many psychologists/psychiatrists did you look for in order to see if this allegation is even possible or common? Did you speek with James and Wade's psychiatrist? Did you asked them if what they say makes any sense at all and fits in a molested person's behavior? - In 2005 Wade asked Michael Jackson if he could get married in Neverland. Does it make any sense that a molested person asks his molester if he can get married in the place where all those terrible sex stuff happened? Is it mentioned in the documentary? No. Either you didn't know (so you didn't look hard enough) or you didn't care. Both options are bad. - In the documentary Wade's wife claims she doesn't know anything about child abuse, and she was very naive about all that. Did you know that Wade and his wife have a website for support abused child (it would be interesting to show how they actually do that) where she claims that she is ALSO a victim of abuse when she was a child. How come you didn't know that? Either you didn't know (so you didn't look hard enough) or you didn't care. Both options are bad. After the documentary aired, they changed the original text, and now seems like only Wade is a survivor of sexual abuse. I could go on forever, but now that you know there is a lot more, do the research you should have done before believing the story of two persons you don't even know

[@robynthomason949]

Carlos Silva you should read betrayal trauma theory to understand how children who are abused don’t identify it as abuse until much, much older. It’s a really great book from a woman who is both a survivor and an expert in the field.

[@AlternativaRealidade]

@@robynthomason949 I understand that Wade, as a child, couldn't understand it. I get it. BUT... As an adult, being asked clear and specific questions on the 2005 trial, does he really expect us to believe that he didn't know that what he went through was abuse? He heard other children accusing MJ of the exactly same things! How can he not put the pieces together? And other thing came to my mind: when you are a victim of sexual abuse, it ends up turning you in a very insecure person, especialy about sexuality. Well, if you look into Wade's life you know that he is very confident of himself, specially in his sexual life (Britney spears, cheating multiple times on Brandi Jackson). So he expects us to believe that these awful stuff that he (supposedly) went through left no emotional scar at all?? Come on. Don't let him take you for a fool, 'cause thats what Leaving Neverland tries to do. I felt very stupid watching some ridiculous allegations, because I already knew Wade's past.

[@robynthomason949]

Carlos Silva actually the common pattern is for kids who are abuse victims to be promiscuous as teens and adults. If that’s what you learn you are for early on that’s what sticks. So that only indicates he’s credible. Read the book, really if you have the ability to be open to learning read it.

[@AlternativaRealidade]

@@robynthomason949 Well I have to admit that I always heard that the lack of confidence was one of the long term effects of sexual abuse. But I don't know, knowing everything Wade did in the past... He called MJ a friend, he asked to have the wedding ceremony on Neverland (where all the abuse took place!!!), he is asking for a 1,5 billion dollar on court. His behavior completly changed after he knew he wouldn't be directing the Cirque du Soleil show about MJ in 2013... Wade is in near Bankruptcy and if he wins the appeal, he will no longer have to worry about money. And he does this only after MJ is dead? I just think he has no credibility at all. His behavior and story is always changing, and this unexpected revelation.

[@robynthomason949]

Carlos Silva having been a survivor and worked with child and adult survivors, promiscuity is a common result. You’ve heard wrong. Try the book, be open to learning.

[@darrylherring1730]

This director needs to be sued and locked up.

[@annlanders978]

Gayle King SHAME ON YOU.

[@anazaeid]

Dan Reed and Wade Robson two unfortonates.

[@basicelement]

you can see in their eyes that they are liying

[@marcoreed3700]

Whats an unfortonate?

[@Rollinjoint]

how is the family of Jackson's not relevant when you are talking about Jackson? I would understand if Jackson did not grow up with the family and the family was not involved in this life?

[@AdrianSLorio]

He knows that the family would totally debunk these allegations as false. He don't want that. Since he is after money. Not the truth

[@jcdx87]

It doesn't have to be just his family. He could have interviewed anybody that was associated with MJ around those times but he didn't.

[@richardkovacs2006]

@@RPMcM09 If a DOCUMENTARIST is not afraid of showing BOTH sides of a story, that would be NATURAL to ask those DOZENS of people, who were there and who defend MJ. For some mysterious reason you can only hear Robson$Safechuck version, NOTHING ELSE. That's not even a "documentary"....

[@horridnsordid]

Latoya Jackson went on tv in the 90s and said Michael was paying families hush money.

[@dansweet2499]

We love Michael and he was probably the most gentle person ever its always about the money and Jackson was the biggest star in the world people took advantage of how kind he was in a world so cruel to him.

[@phoebieryan6770]

0:50 He says every night there was abuse, whilst his mother was next-door, in the other interview with CBS he said that the abuse started when his family left and it was just them alone.

[@chelsea9641]

Another inconsistency

[@funny4899]

​@@chelsea9641 true😂

[@MK-mt8fx]

And people wonder why victims don't come forward.

[@chelsearogers1289]

McKenzie Hope This is the kind of stuff that would intimidate other victims from coming forward.

[@pippavombr5856]

It takes (in many times) years/decades to come out and face the situation what happened to you when you are sexuell abused. You think it is your fault what happened to you and it doesn't help when people don't believe you. I hope that this will not end in a bigger tragedy as it already is, even if M J was a Pedophile the truth must be told.

[@creedbratton1267]

They were in their 20s in 2005. Capable and educated adults. Just so happens in 2019 that MJ is dead and they are trying to get hundreds of millions of dollars from MJ's estate.

[@roderickbalt8993]

@@creedbratton1267 So according to your logic you can never attack anyone because they are rich and then your motive is to get money and also everybody in their 20s faces their childhood trauma? That is absolute hogwash, there are seniors who haven't faced what they went through as a kid, and if MJ was concerned about being sued over money, why have children over time and time again?

[@zindagiahmed4600]

If you'll do little bit research you'll know he was innocent I first stopped his music and researched about him and now I am convinced all the accusers were liers this was all planned many factors were involved some were after money and some were after revenge because some of them he fired from job and some were after his business he was powerful and owned 50%in American music industry.there are too many irrefutable proof against his all accusers that they were lying and after money the whole media were working against him there were a lot of pressure on judiciary but he acquitted ,according to their planned he broken financially but still they couldn't purchase his shares and in 2009 after his death he was free from all his debts because peoples loves him and now again 2019 he was not alive and can't defend himself they repeated the same thing just for money and try to destroyed him completely but look at the situation still peoples are defending him because they are not fool the try to searched the truth, and his accusers again failed and have been ruined they couldn't get what they wanted they couldn't get millions of dollars money by sueing his company and same happened to Martin Bashir and Same happened to Jordan Chandler's father he killed himself no one attended his funeral and now this man will also face the humiliation sooner or later.

[@AurianWarriorOfDarkness]

@@creedbratton1267 You mean "Billions" 1.5 to be exact

[@mjmedia09returns]

How could the settlement be "hush money" when the 1993 case was admitted into the 2005 Criminal trial with the Chandler mother testifying? You do realize settling a civil lawsuit does not stop you from participating in a criminal trial? And you should be asking is why didn't Evan Chandler appear in that 1993 case? Because his actions in this entire scam are problematic because there is evidence from his own mouth that he drugged Jordy with Sodium Amytal, which is a mind control drug. Evan said under this drug the allegations came out. That's the reason he DID not appear in the 2005 Criminal trial. In addition, you can't DRUG someone to make an accusation as that's called "under duress." But the question I like to ask good ole Dan is why did he come to the U.S. for these 2 fake liars but didn't do a video in his own country on Jimmy Savile?

[@tenofspdes]

Dan Reed should be sued by the Jackson's Estate. PERIOD!

[@Raywonka]

Boycotting this doc and everything this director has released and will release

[@StrongerThanYsterday]

The trailer alone was bad acting ,one of the negatives side of this me too movement is providing platform to everyone including LIERS ,so move on people and don't pay any attention to this BS. Next !

[@AdrianSLorio]

The trailer was awful. Not believable at all. They clearly want money

[@StrongerThanYsterday]

OMR alleged victims lol ?! ...Where ?! ok have a nice day :)

[@Hevynly1]

Allow me to correct you, CBS This Morning: 1. King- “The men say Jackson warned them they had to keep the abuse a secret.” That and Robson’s video testimony at the age of 11 when asked, “How did you feel when a boy was alleging that Michael had abused him?” Wade answers, “I was shocked too and I think it’s sick, ‘cause I know Michael that he wouldn’t do anything like that I know that for a fact.” Both instances directly contradict Robson’s adult claim of not knowing that a sexual relationship between adult and child was wrong. 2. King- “Jackson settled a 1993 lawsuit”. Intentionally misleading. Jackson’s insurance company settled a negligence lawsuit in 1994. Not a trial alleging any type of molestation. It is not possible to settle a criminal suit and no criminal charges were ever filed against Jackson at that time. The 1993 lawsuit was a civil lawsuit asking for monetary compensation. 3. King- “Both cases were thrown out because of the statute of limitations.” Also incorrect. There were four cases brought by Robson and Safechuck. All four cases were thrown out of court due to insufficient and fabricated evidence. The lawsuit was against the Jackson Estate, alleging criminal conspiracy to sexually traffic minors including themselves. The judge threw the cases out of court. Robson and Safechuck both owe the Estate over $70K, which they have not paid. 4. Reed- “The deep attachment that forms between the abuser and the abused…” Robson’s mother testified that during the 14 or so visits to Neverland they enjoyed, Jackson was only present for about 4 of those visits. She went on to lament how Jackson was not paying attention to her son and decided to “punish” Michael but disallowing contact for 6 months. Additionally, when seeking to use Neverland as a film location, Wade went through Michael’s nanny Grace, not Michael, to secure permission and thanked her in the credits for “making that happen”. These facts clearly indicate a lack of ease of contact and closeness and would also disprove Reed’s statement that, “They thought Michael was in love with them.” Additionally, Robson’s mother proved that Michael was not interested in Wade so much so that she had to keep contacting Michael to force the relationship. Additionally, Robson was not invited to Michael's private memorial, but begged Jackson family members to allow him attendance. 5. Reed- “Both Wade and James were in love with Michael.” Obsession is a better word as Robson has repeatedly said he was “obsessed with” Michael. Wade also testified that he couldn’t remember if he cried at Michael’s memorial, which clearly shows a lack of love. 6. Reed- “What was important to me was to have eyewitnesses or people who could add something to the story…” Except he offered none because nobody did witness any wrongdoing. The “eyewitnesses” who have come out to corroborate these allegations on various outlets have all been disgruntled ex-employees of Neverland who sold their stories to tabloids for tens of thousands of dollars, later admitting in a court of law that the stories they sold were false. One of which, McManus, was charged with stealing a great deal of Michael’s possessions and ordered to pay Michael $1.6 million, which she never did. 7. Reed- “I didn’t find anything that contradicted or cast any doubt on Wade and James’ accounts.” Their entire testimonies in 2005 completely contradict their current accusations. Both testified under penalty of perjury that Michael never touched them inappropriately. Additionally, James’ story was clearly lifted from the Victor Gutierrez book. Michael sued Gutierrez and won. The judge ordered Gutierrez to pay Michael $2.7 million, but he fled the country instead. Gutierrez is also a NAMBLA member. 8. Reed- “I certainly didn’t want to stake my reputation on a story that didn’t have a strong factual basis and that wasn’t true. I looked for anything that could cast doubt or undermined Wade & James’ stories.” Also untrue as there is a litany of evidence that casts doubt on their stories. Reed also said when choosing the films he will work on, “I do the projects that I like and the projects, that for some reason, turn me on.” Form the conclusions you like from that. 9. King- “I think people have to see it, I think, before they can draw any conclusions on either side.” Anyone who has researched the testimony of Robson and Safechuck can easily see how their stories have changed as many as three times - or as Robson terms it “evolved” - over the recent years. Robson also refers to himself as "a master of deception". 10. The statement that they are not being paid for this is misleading. Both Robson and Safechuck were suing the Estate for millions of dollars, some reports state up to $1.5 billion. Robson also wrote a tell-all book he tried to shop around and sold memorabilia of Michael’s to Julien’s auction house which took in over $80K. In addition to them both appealing their civil monetary case, Robson is currently asking people for donations. 11. Just as an aside, I think it clearly shows CBS This Morning's bias that they uploaded over 9 minutes (his full segment) of Reed's views on this "film" and under 60 seconds of rebuttal from the Jackson family.

[@chancelleflorencenzangngom5760]

👏👏👏

[@dirtydiana7365]

Thank god for your comment, and I would like to add 100s of other points (based on proof) but I just don't have the time, otherwise I would!!! 😁 Rip Michael ❤️

[@saffronxox1724]

See how he stumbles on his words...

[@eddyalvarez2078]

This is trash a hit piece all for money i do my best not to watch this money grab base on making money off a dead man name

[@Illustraful]

Eddy, do you share your bed with other people's kids?

[@eddyalvarez2078]

Illustraful what your point here ? Did you ever group up in a super bands groups and live in hotel sharing room with your brother. custom are base on what you group up to be the norm so your argument make no sense

[@tfrancis8300]

OMR it’s sad how you will blindly believe these people when they give no real evidence in the documentary it’s just pure claims

[@tulayamalavenapi4028]

@@RPMcM09 Just because buttheads fooled you, you have now become a bigger butthead!

[@jaidahrounds4930]

REGIMENT65 okay I'm really getting tired of you going around the comment section talking about the same dang thing every comment you post so since you like documentaries so much here's one you would really like.....have you seen the documentary of a superhero with an iron suit and got together with the most biggest superhero team in the planet? OMG...have you seen it? I believe that 100% it's crazy..oh, what about the boy who got bit by a spider and became a superhero and also joined the superhero team?

[@vivianebeleve3233]

Money💰💰💰2 liars, 2 loosers😠😠😠 #Michael Jackson is Innocent

[@AdrianSLorio]

Yes. They are clearly after money. Which is why they sued the estate for money

[@vivianebeleve3233]

@@RPMcM09 yes yes yes #Michael Jackson is Innocent #😠

[@Nomsaiyan]

we live in an age now where we assume an individual of guilt before finding the truth.

[@natashas.1566]

Even worse, we live in an age now where we assume an individual of guilt without even trying to find the truth. It is all about (fake) presentation. It is all about the filters you chose. It is sad.

[@Syklonus]

It's funny because Michael Jackson actually had a 10 year investigation by the FBI which turned up nothing and he got an official court ruling of not guilty. He literally has more official evidence of his innocence than anyone else on the planet. However it seems that two men in a documentary which does not include evidence is enough to sway people.

[@longnights5945]

Syklone Nope.

[@billiejeanjackson5722]

Reed forget the 10 year was FBI investigate all Michael do

[@longnights5945]

The FBI was not involved in investigating MJ. The FBI merely assisted local law enforcement with resources when requested. So they helped interview people outside local law enforcement’s jurisdiction, or analyze a video or computer for local law enforcement as they had proper technology available. There was never an “FBI investigation”, it was always the FBI helping local police departments on specific tasks requested of them. Even on the FBI website they say: The “FBI didn’t investigate Jackson, the files now available show the FBI working with other agencies.” The FBI DID NOT follow MJ, ever; DID NOT tap his phone; DID NOT put surveillance on MJ; DID NOT search his residence (neither Hayvenhurst, Century City, the Hideout nor Neverland); DID NOT open an investigation into molestation against him; and DID NOT do anything that they would normally do in a federal case.

[@gelynvideos8754]

It's all about Money what do u expect to the media to depend and find a facts about mj common.

[@iordanlucas1]

How can a person can get money fighting against a religion? Stop making excuses to protect this psycho

[@gelynvideos8754]

Sad to say that is different situation so if for u he is psycho for me he is not. I learned to search before I judge unlike u.

[@sebastianmelmoth685]

I find it extremely hard t believe the accusers.

[@shanicephillips9170]

They are lying

[@cameryn6495]

Pls keep it that way cause they r lying

[@loridenham1808]

Sure use Micheal's name alot for having nothing to do with him.

[@sarac.3568]

Just finished watching this thing - made me sick to my stomach. For many reasons. Mostly because of having to listen to explicit sexual misconduct towards children. And then to put Michael's face to it... I am trying to understand their reasoning behind going so public with this. I doubt they will ever get any money worth this kind of drama. I mean, Wade really made it in the entertainment business. They ruined their lives, personal and professional as well, it seems to me. This is my biggest question. I still believe in innocence until proven guilty, and I have seen no proof. What bothers me about Dan is that he doesn't sound professional. I mean, this is his "masterpiece" yet he isn't very well prepared to defend why he has done it. First he says the allegations(?seem like outright statements) are about Michael Jackson, not his family. Then he says, this doc is not about Michael Jackson but two little boys and their 2 decade long struggle...The "documentary" absolutely is one-sided and since it is, I think the director could have prepared better arguments for why he did it in that way. It just seems like he isn't professional. Side note: experiencing molestation myself in childhood, I can understand not wanting to say anything when you're 11. I can't understand going back to testify FOR the person when you're already an adult. I understand we all handle things differently but Wade was well aware while in his 20s that this behavior was NOT ok, and he still went to perjure himself...I can't know what I would do in this situation, but I believe if I had to do this in my case, I would never do it.

[@juliah4117]

Very powerful and honest view, I wish you well in life, this web of lies by Dan is shameful and insulting to real victims of such crimes.

[@smilelikeUmeanit90]

[@Catbooks]

Watch Leaving Neverland, if you haven't already. In it Wade explains the many reasons why he testified for his molester. He's not alone, other CSA victims have done the same when they've been groomed in this way. Yes, as adults. You ask some good questions, which is one of the reasons why I believe them both. Why would they torpedo not only their own lives, but those of their parents, and brothers, sisters, wives, not to mention putting their small children's lives in the way of danger, for the slim chance that they'd win their cases? Knowing the statutes of limitations had run out? Even if they did win, it's a guarantee that the attorneys would appeal it as long as they possibly could and drag it out for years, and even then courts can't force payment. I respectfully disagree with you that Dan Reed doesn't sound professional. I don't understand why you object to those two statements of his. Both Wade and James' statements are allegations. They can't be called anything else but unless this goes to court and is proven there. The allegations ARE about MJ, not his family, and the entire focus of LN is how these two were groomed and abused by MJ for years, and the impact it's had on their and their families' lives. That's why no one else was interviewed, only Wade and James, and their families.

[@jketcham9004]

Sarah M the French television interview is quite good

[@salouisemal4350]

they are trying to get 1.5 billion dollers. wade tried to do this on the quiet at first and he failed after 2 attempts to sue the estate. then he got together with j. safechuck and they decide to sue together, to help their case, they, with the help of dan reed come up with leaving neverland. it is not going in their favour though because their stories dont match and are easily ruled out. even their own mothers stories have actually hurt their case becasuse they dont add up and which i have heard were cut out when LN was played on channel 4 . having such holes in his story is also why wade was not sucessful in his atempts on the quiet. this has all been researched and there are plenty of ppl to watch who have done there research and shows these guys up to be lying. its only fair to look at the two sides. being a victim myself i dont believe them. i watched the oprah interview. they speak so carefully and without any insight, they rely on the accusations which are over the top compared to the other persons who were found out to be lying back in 93. also how can they go on show after show and just repeat the accusations and michaels name over and over without hesitation or evidence of the impact such accusations can have on a person. how many abuse victims can do that so easily. they told oprah that michael was so loving that they didnt see anything wrong. yet later they would say they dissasociated from the abuse. to dissasociate you have to have felt trauma. dissasociation can still be triggered in adulthood and then it becomes scary because all of a sudden its like your here but things are not real and the feeling can then last days, weeks, sometimes longer and can lead to thoughts of ending your life unless it goes away. they mention repression in other statements. repression can happen too in cases of serious sexual trauma, yet they say that it was so loving they didnt think it was wrong, so no trauma. wade defended michael j. in 2005 he was around 23, he knew by then what child sexual abuse is. wouldn't he have been educated by the trials at least and he was the strongest defence witness for the case and has defended m.j. the whole way through up until 2013. he decided to say that he didnt know he was abused untill 2013, which because of 2005 trial cannot be the case. first it was loving, then they say they disasociated and threw in represssion. they said that it was good. even oprah chimed in and and said yes it feels good. WHAT!!!! after she was an abuse victim and she done over 200 shows on this disturbing subject, she helps the men sum abuse up with It Feels Good. That finished it for me, what were they playing at. how dare she do that.... Abuse does NOT FEEL GOOD. how could she do that. the audience was also full of victims. there was not a bit of empathy on show between anyone on the stage, it was more to reel off these gross accusations. grooming has the effect of making the target feel special but once the abuser starts taking what they want thats a whole lot of betrayel, intrusion, pain and future tormoil to place on a child. safechuck said that a lot of his abuse took place at the train station at neverland which was not built until he was 17. both men say the abuse finished when they were 14. there is so much that takes away from their claims. i started looking in to this after the oprah interview. there was something not right about it. ppl do lie about being abused as children because it is the worst crime to be associated with and will hurt the innocent individual for whatever their motives. all mjs accusers wanted money, not justice, money. if he were truley an abuser then they would have fought to put him behind bars so he couldnt hurt anyone else they did not they took money and ran. lies breeds inaccuracy. wade and james look like sexual abuse enablers now too. i would never let an abuser known to me be free to harm other children. luckly mj was not an abuser. his children are fine and love him dearly. no one else has come forward and others who were around him as kids are defending mj. paeds cant help themselves, they will even target their children. look at jimmy saville 100s have come forward. he was an extream opportunist to have his needs catered for. poor unasuming souls lining up outside his dressing room for autographs where he could take his pick. he targeted hospitals where he ran charities for not because he cared but because he saw an opportunity to supply his needs, disgusting. all the kids and ppl all over the world that came into contact with m.j. and not one person has come forward from all over the world! the mans been dead for 10yrs and nothing until these three opportunist men do this badly themselves. get the money and run campaign and smeer m.j. who was so good to them while he was alive while there at it. the man is not here to defend himself. there actions point to opportunity. michael jacksons music and kindness is ledgendary. " heal the world make it a better place for u and for me and the entire human race" are they words from a preditor? i dont think so!

[@belindawalters377]

There should be a law passed if a person has not been found guilty in a court of law ...docs should not be aloud to be done on the story

[@wendelsean2963]

totally agreed!

[@mechajay3358]

Excatly, it's all a false narrative. themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2019/02/25/a-critical-analysis-of-leaving-neverland/

[@annlanders978]

I agree. And why isn't Robson in jail for perjuring himself in the 2005 trial?

[@AdrianSLorio]

Agree

[@mariahsmith5380]

He came to them.....they didn’t go to him...ha that really shows he wanted to earn a bag of money

[@Travis7060312]

That's how this works. Publishing companies have already contacted people involved in the college scam ordeal for a book. The people involved in the scam didn't go to the publishers, the publishers went to them.

[@Syklonus]

@@Blichens "Were".

[@squidbate3404]

Linda Beszt exactly lmao it’s insane how many people still think MJ didn’t touch little boys 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@maxineshaw3259]

@@Blichens I totally agree, they were young children and young children don't lie about being abused. They came up with this after being adults. The longer you're in this world the more fk'd up you become if you don't watch your mind. They said nothing happened as children. I will always believe a child.

[@Phantomiam]

He saw opportunity and went for it money hungry 😂😂

[@MaryMary-sn7hh]

May the KOP MJ rest in eternal peace.

[@pabloo8837]

Accusing someone after being dead is a coward thing to do

[@monty0289]

Sorry people but as a 37 year old man I would never even think about sharing a bed with 10 year old 'friends'. It's even weird classing kids that young as friends

[@ms.gordon3802]

I'm still waiting for people to provide court documents that said he ever slept in the bed with kids. Instead it says Michael slept on the floor while kids slept in the bed smh

[@monty0289]

@@ms.gordon3802 even that set up is just weird! would you do that??

[@monty0289]

@@ms.gordon3802 assuming you had 10 year old kids and they had a sleepover - would you sleep in the same room as them? Of course you wouldn't because that would be WEIRD. Best bit about it is they weren't even his kids so that's 100 x more strange. There must be a part of you deep down, that thinks something was off about that. You can still enjoy his music, yes he was very very talented, doesn't mean he didn't do bad things

[@ms.gordon3802]

​@@monty0289 You're talking about a man who was one of the youngest out of 10 siblings who weren't always financially well off growing up which means they had to share a lot. It's not hard to imagine someone whose shared a room with his older brother not thinking much about a kid sleeping in his 2 story condo. It's more than likely it brought him back to his childhood when he was that age. The only reason it seems sexual is because you choose to view it in that way and saying he wasn't their family doesn't mean that people don't have people who aren't family look after their kids. The fact is that people do to this day let people who aren't family watch their kids and it's only being scrutinized in MJ's case because of the allegations and people wanting to demonize every action in hindsight. I can guess that many male celebrities have watched a friends son doesn't mean that man will but rape him but that's the precedent we are saying. Even on the opposite end of the spectrum let's say that MJ did rape these guys, the film even still should include the other side of the story. Instead what we are telling people is that anytime anyone wants to make a claim true are false one side of the claim is enough to prosecute people by media. I agree with Oprah in idea that this transcends MJ but to the effect that the way we present and receive information as a society is bankrupt of any codes of conduct or regulation to ensure validity and relevance. This sets a bad precedent for future "documentaries".

[@tinyyogini]

I had my doubts. Who wouldn't? But when I heard them describe the stages of grooming and how the abuse escalated, I immediately knew they were telling the truth. Why? Because they basically described my own experience as a child. And I didn't come forward until I was almost 40. It's amazing how capable we are of burying and hiding our stories out of shame, especially when the abuser was someone close to us (as in my case). For those of you jumping to conclusions and assuming they're lying, I encourage you to dig into childhood abuse and trauma so you can understand how it affects the way we think and how that manifests throughout our lives. It's a very complicated brain and nervous system injury.

[@Feluc1]

What a shame you listen to tabloids and do no research!

[@claudiaarmah2389]

There are good actors who can lie professionally.

[@angelnicole17777]

@@claudiaarmah2389exactly😂😂😂

[@LittleCreek30]

Doesn’t anyone at all think it was odd having young boys sleepover at your house, in your room!??? Boys you aren’t even related to.

[@GregoryAlanBaileygamereviews]

Even after his death, some people are just to greedy to make millions out of him.

[@ritalati586]

Don’t forget that when they went to court. Jackson was a live . His still have them in his hands !!! U don’t know what he said