Are floating offices and water homes our future? | Land Unlimited | Full Episode

[@dongjing7283]

When I lived in countryside when I was young, I looked forward to the life of big city. Now stay in big city for many years, I miss countryside life.

[@Mtkvks82]

I have lived in both kind of lives, it’s n suburbs. I still miss the big city life

[@johnchua5328]

Building self sustaining floating cities (with capacity of 50,000) each is a good altrnative for land scarce and for this matter sea area scarcity in Singapore. it has to consider the impact on the under water eco system it also has to consider the impact of the commercial shipping lane that handles thousands of ship daily.

[@RonzigtheWizard]

I am certainly impressed with Singapore's ability to find new solutions to old problems but the real problem they need to find a solution too is the demand to continuously grow. They should learn when enough is enough and develop a means to maintain a successful society without seeking constant growth.

[@johnchua5328]

You should tell your government to stop seeking constant growth. because you had enough. We will continue to seek consistant growth not just for now but for future generation.

[@tomkelly8827]

Floating cities are an excellent idea!

[@xcre8ionx]

Love the enthusiasm of Singapore

[@scsu300]

Inspired by its constraints

[@tomkelly8827]

I am watching this in rural Canada. It is super interesting to see what is possible. Out here though the land seems endless. Our main issue is a lack of people

[@theobserver9131]

Let's hope it stays that way. I don't want Canada to look like Singapore.

[@vgames1543]

Floating platforms with skyscraper that reach both up into the sky and down into the Abyss, sounds cool doesn't it?

[@kvetchdreckmann8483]

Ocean engineering materials is a tough dilemma. Sea water is basically 'life paste', where if you stick something in the ocean, stuff will grow on it, and often into it. Then there's the corrosion of sea water itself, especially at the oxygenated 'lapping' level. Things get ugly quickly when you stick them in the ocean, unless it's coated in something toxic. It's fine to put on virtual reality goggles and have hope, perhaps, but there's a massive lack of practicality without a materials and maintenance discussion. It's the difference between an investment scam and an investment, or waste versus progress.

[@kvetchdreckmann8483]

This conjures other architectural ideas, especially the recently recurring theme of forests in skyscrapers. Graphic artists turn city planners by pasting fanciful ideas onto photos of cities. (It worked for science fiction book covers.) Ignoring the lack of space for root systems in most images, vegetation also requires lots of water; water has high mass; these 'forest buildings' would be simultaneously over-built and under-built earthquake prone resource hogs. [When: Force = 1/2 * Mass * Velocity(^2), and you add an earthquake, that water suddenly acts really heavy with every ripple, and wants to take that building down.] Again, the heavy moisture would promote disintegration, require sterilization, while sucking large amounts of power to circulate the needed water, as they'd be upside-down waterfalls on hefty steel and concrete matrices.

[@joeyat3529]

In Singapore, we have an aging population and a shrinking population due to the lowest fertility rate in the world - 1.08. that means Each couple only has one child. I don't understand why in the first two sentences, they assert that Singapore is growing and we must have more land for people.

[@joeyat3529]

​@Mr. Frank 'forever 40' Garret That's not going to happen because people is not going to give their vote. So, I am still baffled why the projection of growth.

[@xenuburger7924]

@@joeyat3529 It's happening in the USA and nobody is being asked to vote about it. Federal courts ensure that it cannot be voted on.

[@GlennYarwood]

Maybe we’d be looking after the sea a bit better if we lived in it 👍

[@nurjahannijhu1637]

No we'd ruin it more just like we're ruining our lands

[@RonzigtheWizard]

Doubtful. More likely all waste would get dumped directly into the water. It's the capitalist way.

[@WhoAmEye_WhoAreEwe]

@@RonzigtheWizard "......It's the capitalist way...." Well said. 👍

[@mauryginsberg7720]

The old London bridge (before it fell down) was built like this where the bridge had a market, 138 shops. multi-seated public latrines, an unknown number of private latrine it even had a palace and and a bloody church! and that was built in 1176.

[@chillylizerd]

Thanks. 👍I knew about the shops but not the rest

[@isaachung9382]

Interesting Development.

[@gaslitworldf.melissab2897]

Impressive. If I were in my 30s, I'd study Malay for an opportunity to live and work there. It's a tropical city, but as a young person, you can more easily adapt than a menopausal woman. Lol.

[@catherinelee1064]

GaslitWorld f. Melissa B Singapore is a multi-racial country, thus many languages are being communicated. As Long as you can speak English, you can move easily within the country...

[@thedamnedatheist]

Shimitzu, of course, lol. Build down for commercial & industrial uses, build up & over roads. Don't build floating structures anchor the securely into the seabed with breakwalls around them.

[@paulystp]

The homeless finds space that isn’t used

[@mrbart518]

Interesting video, yet the music that was supposed to be in the background ran as foreground and made it harder for me to hear the people giving the info.

[@kiranm25x]

Finally found someone else who also felt the same! Thought I was the only one. Could not hear 70% of his words.

[@Alieou]

There is many videos to make noise about the music but, this isn't one those in my opinion.

[@seokoking6956]

Singapore has been living on concrete literally. The tech for building into the sea , ‘floating’ on water. Roads and airports have been build over concrete slabs. Why not. Go for it. You can have garden high in the sky. What’s to stop building over water?

[@dogan6070]

the whole country is going to be overcrowded with high-rise buildings and not feel good when you're walking down the aisle it doesn't have that open concept!.

[@Enviotonin85]

instead of trying to build houses over the canal, might as well build a cover on the canal and then build houses on it. Adding levels to heritage building might as well just demolish the whole building, as if it goes wrong its will be hotel new world waiting to happen again.

[@CQChannel]

Useful, thank u for sharing 👍

[@sinOsiris]

underground or floating near coast all contribute data and mayhap in near future underwater borne -- integral aspect growth +orbital/ beyond earth planetary

[@InfiniteEchos]

..have heard of uphill gardening, but vertical farming 🤔..

[@Templemain]

Singapore is a country of mixed races with a super potential but land is a problem. I don't know why all of those experts trying to find more space have not considered SHIPS. Around the world thousands of cruise, cargo, container ships have past their useful life on the sea. Much bigger ships are being designed but that does not stop those older ships being completly

[@Templemain]

SEE recent comment: That does not stop those older ships being completely refurbished to become luxury homes, malls, sports center, parks, educational centers, hospitals, play grounds, parks or working man's accommodations. These great ships that no longer have engines, but are now just movable containers can but parked on a grand marina suiting their refurbishment. Time is a cruel mistress and every ten years or so these ships need servicing but no problem, they are simply towed to a dry dock repaired refurbished & returned to their berth. Singapore could be a city of a thousand great ships that go no where. Imagine the tourist potential?

[@jzk2020]

Cool doc.

[@mikewillis44]

You take a huge space outside London put good prefabs on it and join it to central London with a hyperloop.It's not that hard .Both are developed concepts. Sewers ,water and electricty is done all the time. Done by Government because they can borrow the money cheapest.The rent goes back to them

[@RonzigtheWizard]

One major drawback I see with these rooftop developments is that they neglect the opportunity incorporate built in solar systems into the developments. Such shortsightedness is a terrible waste of an opportunity. Utilizing solar in a new development's roof is far less costly than adding panels to an existing building.

[@darrenmarchant1720]

salaam the sky is not the limit.

[@Guguaguga]

well, personally i don't like the idea of building residential houses on the canal. first is because of landscape, a city for residents should not cover all its space with concrete; second, it is very humid when you live above water. you may visit those water city to see how the molds growing on the wall. this idea is more suitable for building vertical agriculture for sg

[@anomalysg9489]

How about sky or space?

[@Humanaut.]

33:44 LEGO ftw

[@alantan9863]

44:43 Having a self driving bus eliminate the problem of sleepy head for night shift drivers.

[@hw5768]

How old is this report , it even says HK runs out of grade A offices . It’s a bloody joke , companies cant wait to exit HK ASAP now .

[@joeyat3529]

@D9INE LEGEND Did anyone ask if the Singapore citizens would prefer to be the minority in their own country? I think we have a problem in the planning assumption.

[@shawtyyy3549]

Joe Yat Singapore is literally a country of immigrants, what are you on about?

[@星辰学姐-g3j]

Maybe make better use of office spaces that are left empty after working hours

[@dayylogg9716]

The future will be robotic, automation, AI and remotely operated devices. Hence, we do not need human intervention on most of the operation. And, most of the countries will be focusing on depopulation or the STOP AT TWO genocide policy to reduce their population. For example, a surgeon can operate on a patient in Singapore from London. Road vehicles are driverless etc.

[@l-b01josefandres44]

nope, we're gonna colonize other celestial bodies freeing up space on earth and populating the stars of our own.

[@dayylogg9716]

@@l-b01josefandres44 Wait for the Alien Disclosure.

[@l-b01josefandres44]

@@dayylogg9716 so?

[@dayylogg9716]

@@l-b01josefandres44 We're doomed.

[@joeyat3529]

The technology is cool though, maybe that's why the civil servants love it!

[@ngrobert5054]

CECA boss

[@theobserver9131]

Very creative engineering, but this can only go so far. If our population keeps growing, we need to grow OFF planet. We've already destroyed too much of this planet's ecosphere and wiped out thousands of species. We're not quite ready to move to other planets, but we ARE ready to build and inhabit space stations.

[@prossynannyanzi7072]

What popped in my head is WHERE would sewage go?

[@davegoldfarb]

the garden

[@PhiloSurfer]

it is being converted into drinking water

[@dannyhughes9874]

Tunneling into mountains -- great idea. Elon Musk has some great Boring Machines and he works REALLY FAST.

[@donkeykong516]

Singapore has this problem, but it can’t take ocean waters from others

[@ctkalan]

we can build under water city.

[@frederikawells2425]

👍👍👍

[@pleaseyourdeityhereletmere8926]

Er, no! Why? Are we suddenly running out of that other stuff? LAND!

[@saifulabee3389]

3A+ yes,of course i really know about that bcoz mymoney very2 unlimited to much n too many a lot can do more project unlimited in the world,🤴🏻💯✅🌁💷🌍

[@davegoldfarb]

100 years lifespan isn't too good

[@bobbone8029]

Ya, not when your 55 years old! Lol! We need longer lives or learn how to manipulate time!

[@bobbone8029]

This is NOT a NEW IDEA! Ppl been doing this for thousands of years!

[@cliffwoodbury5319]

In a place like singapour they can build into the mountains. You start from teh top and extract rock and you can turn whole mountains or large portions fo mountains into city sectors

[@mightyrockstar22]

singapore jeez correct your spelling ffs

[@PhiloSurfer]

@@mightyrockstar22 pardon my French

[@whatthef911]

Or maybe reduce zoning laws and housing regulations.

[@whatsupbudbud]

I bet the powers that be shall make zoning laws and housing regulations worse for both land dwellers and floaters. :D

[@staph8022]

i have a new idea for renewable energy for coastal cities, can anyone tell me how do i pursure my technology?

[@staph8022]

or how can i implement it in real life without any companies stealing my ideas? :))

[@andydc8838]

Those guys missed WW1 and WW2

[@davebezo5134]

And waterworld becomes reality time to grow some gills lol

[@grandmaster137]

Singapore has never heard of land reclamation?

[@bnggon9248]

Watch part 1 to find out how much land SG has already reclaimed and why other options are being considered. kzbin.info/www/bejne/oqm2nX-BocSIeLM&t=1180&fbclid=IwAR1vDKVX8GoGWIMO4kQyfdKxTBON9coL57BSAUbQc28SYOyELHwko17czAQ

[@gaslitworldf.melissab2897]

I think floating cities are better than going deep underground, because it will disrupt water systems and require complex ventilation and water management. Why not have cruise ship style condos and rental apartments? There is plenty of water around Singapore.

[@1ninaboo1]

we're polluting the sea enough

[@jarrodyuki7081]

why not just take some land from indonesia?

[@tokitoyotokitoyo]

Can, unless you want to take on their military go ahead.

[@udgamcl]

or just buy some more land from neighboring countries with ur mega bux

[@telelakay-tv1337]

Télélakay TV

[@ballsakch2489]

Yes it's called FEMA barges in America

[@vinny4149]

You guys made this seem like a commercial for that indian guy. That's nothing new.

[@natpainter8185]

going backwards blindly and polluting yourself, ya real smart

[@animewatch4213]

Why not just open more free trade zone with Malaysia? Plenty of lands there for industry and etc.

[@juliettun7574]

I think there should be a law in Singapore that a family must have less than 5 children. I think people should not live in houses on water. Ocean is for animals and mermaids. Ocean is not for people. I think Singaporeans should rent land in Malaysia and live in houses in Malaysia.

[@jemimychannel7893]

What makes you think that SULTAN JOHOR gonna let your ideas become reality?

[@xinhee2794]

What? Singapore has a Low fertility rate. Hence, government has been encouraging more families to have children. Did you forgot /s?

[@alantan9863]

Maybe retire in Malaysia. Letting Singaporean stay in Malaysia at substantial numbers is a politically problematic situation.

[@battlespace13]

The average family size in Singapore is 3.24. That means two parents, a child, maybe 2 children every 5 households. They're only growing due to foreigners moving there, apparently.

[@the3rdeye776]

Increase of land is NOT a must. The human population has to stop growing--this is the must--you are thinking small--the world is limited in size, the world's dwindling resources is NOT just for humans; humans serve no purpose for the natural world. If the human race disappears the world would be an healthier and more peaceful place; if the bees disappears terrestrial food chain is drastically affected--"the sky's the limit" idea come from people who knows nothing about the natural world. Stop having babies--adopt children already there.

[@peterkompter2417]

roads, ya great for yoga, tai chi, do you or modern people even know what these activities mean? who cares mostly lost already anyways, lol, FYAMF

[@dadude4960]

30:45 talking about Europe, show the US. the sound engineer should be fired as well. your Hans Zimmer remixing sucks.

[@daryjohnmizelle]

such mediocre music in this film...

[@scholarlyreader383]

In silicon valley we have listen to these idiot with their grandiose ideas. The resulting affect has been awful to the caste majority in working and middle class people in the valley.

[@vinny4149]

Let's tell the muslims to stop having 10 children

[@shukriramlee]

Says the ex-miner settler. How come Singapore got 75% majority Chinese in Southeast Asian country? The only possiblity is that slanted got their baby like how hor nieee ra bbit bree d.

[@kikin310]

what about getting rid of all those space wasting churches? and build homes for people that need them

[@TheMelluuu]

Can I get a "Hell no"?

[@frederikawells5785]

100 years is not that long 😱😱😱

[@hoangle2446]

Frederika Wells yes it is the longer

[@peterbelanger4094]

I agree, 100 years is not that long for large scale architecture. Sure it lasts for the lifetimes of the people who built it, but the following generations are left with a decaying heap. All this fancy new technology, we can't design a structure to last 500-1000 years or more? FFS, people thousands of years ago knew more about building things that last than we do. Bring back the megaliths!

[@Templemain]

SEE recent comment: That does not stop those older ships being completely refurbished to become luxury homes, malls, sports center, parks, educational centers, hospitals, play grounds, parks or working man's accommodations. These great ships that no longer have engines, but are now just movable containers can but parked on a grand marina suiting their refurbishment. Time is a cruel mistress and every ten years or so these ships need servicing but no problem, they are simply towed to a dry dock repaired refurbished & returned to their berth. Singapore could be a city of a thousand great ships that go no where. Imagine the tourist potential?

[@frederikawells5785]

👍👍