actually couldn’t tell the difference until your sister used it to film! Good content 📸
@tomjens20466 жыл бұрын
interesting, I have zero experience with video and it was pretty clear that first one was more shaky.
@analuisabenitez5 жыл бұрын
me too! jejejeje
@J_claud5 жыл бұрын
Aye, its Montell Fish!
@GMM-j925 жыл бұрын
loool
@pe1etr5 жыл бұрын
Ditto.
@davidlongenecker94146 жыл бұрын
I actually use a glidecam for my professional work. It takes a bit of technique, but once you have it down, you can get 90% of the same shots. And you don't need batteries, and it will never glitch out... Like I always say, physics will never malfunction.
@MyFriendlyPup6 жыл бұрын
Bearings can. Lol
@loganconnmusic73145 жыл бұрын
MyFriendlyPup far less likely. Especially with good bearings.
@THEMATT2225 жыл бұрын
.....until you want to change the focal length!!
@MrLennonson5 жыл бұрын
@@MyFriendlyPup hahahahaha agree with u!
@hqmediaprod5 жыл бұрын
And having the skill is👌
@TheCrowleyCrew6 жыл бұрын
The steady cam was not exactly as smooth but it didn't have the weird bouncing movement that plagues gimbals. Both require learning before you get cinematic results. Good comparison and clever to use someone that hasn't used them to show the difference skill makes with the steady cam.
@Kelkschiz6 жыл бұрын
I like that you showed how much difference the skill level makes: gimbals good for everyone, and steadicam only good with skill. I recently bought a cheap steadicam and was surprised by how difficult it was. The balancing alone was a nightmare.
@dakhos6 жыл бұрын
That's because you bought the cheaper one, also owned chepo for 2-3 years, got better with time but still it is worse than glidecam hd, recently bought used hd2000 for 170 and oh man that thing is so easy
@NicolasWaldvogel6 жыл бұрын
I actually thought the cheap gimbal looked better when you did the test. It just seems more natural and organic (and therefore more cinematic) than the motorized one. The only motorized gimbal that didn't seem robotic to me is the Ronin S! Thanks for the video:)
@tillfischer19085 жыл бұрын
That's the point! That's why even in Hollywood the mostly shoot with steadycams it's much more natural and cinematic👌🏼
@TopblokeGolf5 жыл бұрын
Till Fischer I’m watching a top Netflix film now, and it’s all jerky hand movement style shots,
@NatesFilmTutorials6 жыл бұрын
The Steadicam feels more fluid and natural
@NigelBarros6 жыл бұрын
I think so too, but the gimbal is definitely more consistent!
@NatesFilmTutorials6 жыл бұрын
NigelBarros good point, maybe worth having both. Biggest thing I wanna have is to get the shot quickly in as few takes possible. I’m finding it more annoying to try to get it right handheld.
@nightcoder5k6 жыл бұрын
Some movements make it look more natural, and sometimes that's what you want. I bet a bit of post-stabilization would smooth that out if needed.
@StayingAfloat6 жыл бұрын
it wouldn't work for me cause I jump with it in my hand's XD filming freerunning
@bruhdabones5 жыл бұрын
CODER QN or a bit of post camera shake effect 😂 going the other way
@jeremyc19926 жыл бұрын
This was the most straightforward and honest comparison between the two. Subscribed!
@Noojtxeeg6 жыл бұрын
Very glad that you decided to explain that it took some skill to use the cheaper option as well as showing the difference in skill. I feel like many KZbinrs would have left this part out.
@Noname304y2u26 жыл бұрын
That cheap stabilizer design use to cost about 400 dollars back in the day.
@aMoneyYell6 жыл бұрын
SPOT ON! They USED to be HELLA expensive
@JeremyGalloway6 жыл бұрын
I knew I wasn’t crazy!
@alphasiera17576 жыл бұрын
Lol
@Lauw105 жыл бұрын
Yeah I bought one for €200,- wonder wher it's now🤔
@ashevilletrainman69894 жыл бұрын
Cuz they actually worked. Usually cheap things =crappy ISH, noticeable cheaper, and expensive items are expected to work well . These worked well. They got away with the $400 cuz people got it and actually got something out of it.
@dameanvil6 ай бұрын
0:00 📹 Introduces two stabilizers from different price ranges: Home Tech iStudy Gear ($400) and Cisno ($40) 0:12 💸 Describes Home Tech as an electronic 3-axis gimbal 0:21 🛠 Explains Cisno as a mechanical gimbal with manual balancing 0:48 🎯 Plans to compare footage from both stabilizers and reveal which is which 1:45 📊 Invites viewers to guess which footage looks best 1:51 🧑🤝🧑 Little sister will operate both gimbals to demonstrate ease of use 2:36 🔍 Reveals Shot A was Cisno ($40) and Shot B was Home Tech ($400) 2:47 🤔 Prefers the $400 stabilizer for ease of use and smoother shots 3:06 🔋 Notes advantages of the $40 stabilizer: no batteries, waterproof, portable 3:24 🛠 Mentions a full review of the Home Tech gimbal available 3:34 📏 Highlights Home Tech's capacity to hold 5.5 pounds
@itsKEVO6 жыл бұрын
This makes me feel better that I went out and got a 3 axis gimbal from using my glidecam hd2000..stable footage with minimal enough or skill. Great content man glad I found your channel and yes I've hit the bell lol
@almanages4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for providing this very interesting comparison Nigel. I appreciate your down to Earth approach and format. It's entertaining, short to the point and very informative. Good Job!
@Tokiofritz3 жыл бұрын
The great thing with Nigel is that he understands not everyone can spend $400 on a gimbal. Another budget gimbal video on here starts at $500!
@Mike0193Azul4 жыл бұрын
Appreciate the video and honesty on both systems. I'll be getting a stabilizer for now and a gimbal later on
@fizikone19734 жыл бұрын
Still waiting for the tutorial on how to balance the $40 gimbal.
@HitWaveMusic4 жыл бұрын
I used to have a glide cam but it got stolen on a gig. There is a very large learning curve with just being able to set it up to be balanced. And as soon as you change your lens the entire balance gets thrown off... or even if you just flip open your lcd screen... it will have to be re-balanced. Honestly it was a pain to use.
@martinf96266 жыл бұрын
I use both . The stabilizer for more natural look or cinematic mood and the Crane 2 for more technical scene . but the only problem i encountered with the stabilizer is when you are outside and you have to much wind . then you can't use it . and yes you need a lot of practice to operate the Stabilizer. I use a Canon T7I with a big wide angle Tamron 10-24 mm
@jorgem506 жыл бұрын
I've always preferred the smoothness of a stabilizer but with the right gimbal, camera, and IBIS you can get amazing buttery smooth footage from a gimbal.
@nilent5 жыл бұрын
My inexpensive Vixia HFR800 already has pretty good digital stabilization. When combined with the inexpensive mechanical stabilizer *and* a skilled/attentive technique it should do a great job! Your review was very helpful, thanks.
@theiammike123 Жыл бұрын
Having both is a solid investment. Not only you can bring out your traditional when the gimbal's battery suddenly runs out. Not also when you'll be shooting a rainy scene (unless the gimbal's waterproof). You can also save your gimbal for definitely camera-intensive scenes by using the traditional for otherwise. Best of both worlds. 📸
@themockingjay31735 жыл бұрын
I'm amazed by the place .... The pine trees looks amazing
@HitWaveMusic4 жыл бұрын
Your link in the description was broken.
@markusgroyss32626 жыл бұрын
I personally prefer the Steadycam look because it‘s more natural and you can operate it better - especially for slow slider like movements. only prefer the gimbal for higher speed shots (dirt bike etc.)
@summers92183 жыл бұрын
The steadycam is what I still bought in 2021. I am never a fan of gimbal because it cant turn quickly, it glitches frequently. In smoothness the steadycam is a bad ass when it comes to cenematic shots. I love it even more.
@creativesymon5 жыл бұрын
Your experienced use of the stabilizer was 100% passable and usable. So much + for something with no batteries needed etc. BUT...I'd take a motorised one if anyone was offering! Ha! But the prices of gimbals is getting above that of actual cameras and we need to all say "NO" to that shit. It's purely taking advantage.
@YourOwnAdventure6 жыл бұрын
Glidecam always looks better! I still use mine because I don't have to worry about batteries running out.
@Thedanielmart6 жыл бұрын
I feel ya, I have the Ronin-S and still seem to use my GlideCam a ton because its so damn reliable..
@phill_super-beardmay39703 жыл бұрын
The UPS truck and the end made me laugh. I'm a UPS driver and am learning photography and video. I bet that driver loves driving out there.
@GMCobh5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, your sister demonstrated the difference well. Gimbals were also used on Apollo missions, which is why I came here. Thanks again :)
@hannessassenberg73416 жыл бұрын
Honestly I am using that cheap stabilizer since few month for my LUMIX G6 and it works very well. If you ask me this is the Must have for budget beginner! For me it’s like this Gold Medal: Gimbal Silver Medal: Glidecam (btw if you buy it second hand it’s around 150 bugs) Bronze Medal: cheap stabilizer
@Bobster9865 жыл бұрын
The advantage of using a electronic gimbal is that you can focus all your effort on composition vs keeping it stable.
@rorsharch3 жыл бұрын
I could tell the difference easily. However, I think there’s something to the shake of a steadicam that looks good.
@giallodreams6 жыл бұрын
this location you shot in looks so cool, i really need to check out the PNW one day
@wheeliebrady3 жыл бұрын
I ride electric unicycle and want to have an extension pole to film any ideas? I have canon 6 d but want to set it up with gimble extension pole ect.
@ConflictMedia6 жыл бұрын
40$ Steadycam looks good, but in this video you don't really push both to their limits. Slow walking should be easy for both. I would like to see a video in which you compare them in extreme conditions :D Anyways a great video!
@baz61283 жыл бұрын
Dude your videos are gold. GOLD!!
@KosmatiBohem3 жыл бұрын
Before I watch video: I reckon mechanical gimbal will give smoother footage with no jerkiness, but more floating. Electronic gimbal will give footage perfectly level with horizon, but more jerky (sudden correction, small jitter). Manual gimbal demand perfect balancing that can be very fiddly and tedious with cheap gimbals and every gram of change on setup counts against balance, while gyro-gimbals excuse a lot of mistakes with expense of less smooth image. Now, let's go watching. :)
@kelasbebas8742 Жыл бұрын
I have both of these kinds of stabilizer. Both have same purpose, to stabilize. But each of it has different specific purpose. I will keep to use the steadycam for some kind of shooting. It has natural feel and sometimes its all what i want, not too steady, but feels live.
@NabidHasan6 жыл бұрын
Finally KZbin feed suggested something I was looking for!!
@kraftistbumerang2 жыл бұрын
First take which you used stabilizer cisno is the best. When you use the gombal its a little more stricted and stressful footage for me. first one suits the scene emotionally most.
@dharmikrajasekhar19386 жыл бұрын
I was expecting you would say the 40$ gimbal is better at it's price man you are truly genuine love you love this video enjoyed the shots man
@GadgetInspector6 жыл бұрын
That must be one quiet road. Makes for some cool shots.
@swartgb69736 жыл бұрын
The A looked better actually. Good job !
@mchampag6 жыл бұрын
Great demonstration, and beautiful image, as usual! I'm surprised at how much those mechanical stabilizers are coming down in price (presumably because the gimbals are getting cheaper). A year or so ago, they were $100 or more.
@josephedwardnancheta3286 Жыл бұрын
In my opinion, I would go for the cheap stabiliser. I would agree to what you said about the no-need batteries and the waterproof side. I do a lot of outdoor shots and recharging batteries would be a problem. Thanks for this info video.
@Record503S6 жыл бұрын
the $40 cisno is now $52.99, wtf, lol
@mister.richiemusic6 жыл бұрын
Yes jahahaha I saw the same too!
@alwaysbenicesmileoften84924 жыл бұрын
Hahahaaa
@ashevilletrainman69894 жыл бұрын
Cuz people increased buying
@oDzTV5 жыл бұрын
40$ still out of my budget xD
@userouyuy4 жыл бұрын
oDzTV true! 😂
@braedenolewnik54854 жыл бұрын
Lol same
@juanpinate73194 жыл бұрын
U still broke man? :(
@bauszczyk81213 жыл бұрын
same lol
@madedigital6 жыл бұрын
The other thing is weight of camera won’t be limited also weather proof
@hgoneci8 ай бұрын
I thinki somebody thought that, what if, I mount the gimbal on the stabilizer. how about together using.. please test it for us.
@tillfischer19085 жыл бұрын
Heyy there, it's incredibly difficult to master a steadycam and I think it's one of the hardest techniques in filmmaking at all. Even in big movie productions the DoPs use steadycams over gimbal (Emanuel Lutzbezki got famos threw his steadycam skills). So gimbals are just more practical and easier to use (for getting much better footage much faster) but when you are good with a steadycam you can even achieve better results. Just check out @mattihaapoja or @parkerwalbeck.
@tillfischer19085 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/ep_Mh5mPq8qUn7M
@joelgrizzel83716 жыл бұрын
I just think you'd make a great brother in law. What a guy.
@atarassi6 жыл бұрын
I have the same steadycam and I agree. I prefer spend 40$ and take the time to learn how to handle and walk with, improve my technique, than spend 400$
@pacificostudios3 жыл бұрын
Attaching a monopod to a camera and using image stabilization works well for me. Then I can stabilize further in post for rock-solid shots. However, thanks for showing how much better a gimbal is. My B Camera, a Canon XC10, would be perfect on a gimbal.
@redshiftmedia24854 жыл бұрын
did your camera lens have OSS? do you think that we can stabilized shots with average technique without OSS
@MightyMonk3606 жыл бұрын
Her face in the video 😂😂😂made my day 😂
@JPSRose6 жыл бұрын
Do you think the cheap mechanical gimbal would be ok with a very light camera, like the Samsung Gear 360? I'd like to experiment with using it on trips, but I don't want to break the bank doing so. Cheers!
@DTRBrianMallard5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info! I've always wondered how that 40 dollar rig worked, cool.
@komnothet6 жыл бұрын
The camera that you use to test have body stabilizer?
@komnothet6 жыл бұрын
Or stabilizer on the len?
@NigelBarros6 жыл бұрын
No, the lens and body are not stabilized
@komnothet6 жыл бұрын
@@NigelBarros thanks
@WilliamMcAlpine7776 жыл бұрын
You're video came at the perfect time for me! I'm looking at getting a €50 stabiliser. The footage looked good.
@jemenade3 жыл бұрын
Where can I buy the stabilizer gimble?
@MobileFilmmaking5 жыл бұрын
My gimbal died while making my new short so it would have been great to have that mechanical one as a back up. Do you think it would work ok with a mobile phone? Do you have any videos on how to use it?
@isabellagalimberti5 жыл бұрын
Heyyy Nigel! It would be great if you could record a video about how you manually write on screen, thats so cool!
@daisigner4 жыл бұрын
Gosh, I laugh my a** off when your sister tried the Cheaper Gimbal...
@JasonMichaelKotarski5 жыл бұрын
Good comparison, very noticeable but I can see where one might benefit for a "look" over the other (whether that's steadier or "homemade") A) I notice I focused more on the background moving around and the subject was second B) I focused on the subject and she had more movement in her stride with a smoother background that wasn't distracting.
@JyrkiS6 жыл бұрын
This was great and informative test, especially since you showed how it looks when pro uses both and how it looks when totally new person uses both.
@adamh.79406 жыл бұрын
It was easy to tell right away. It was obvious that A was $40, due to the slight swinging motion in the shot. In shot B, it was clear that it was filmed with the iSteady, due to the shot looking perfect.
@ScarlettVisualsEnt5 жыл бұрын
is it me or was Shot "A" a lot better then Shot" B"? felt/looked a lot smoother . cool comparison , helpful. thank you.
@thanhdat2212 Жыл бұрын
it's because the sister didn't walk as smooth as him
@jeffmurnahan4 жыл бұрын
To get the highest bit rate with a Panasonic gh2, do you have to use the avchd format or whatever it’s called? And if you do, is there a way to easily get it onto my phone so I can use lumafusion to edit?
@jeffmurnahan4 жыл бұрын
I don’t want to use my laptop since it sucks when it comes to editing, and putting the videos on my laptop first would be a huge hassle of an extra step. I’d like to be able to transfer them to my phone directly if possible
@jejakbayang85225 жыл бұрын
A6000 & sigma 16mm can be good in steadicam bro?
@KiR_3d Жыл бұрын
Hi! Is 400$ stabilizer weather resistant?
@david_potvin156 жыл бұрын
Is the music used an instrumental of “Breach” by The Tower and the Fool by any chance?
@sketchbyty5076 жыл бұрын
Hey Nigel, i m using a panasonic g6 with a rode mic and i cant seem to stop the hiss. Can you pls tell me how you fixed that? Thx.
@Ben-rz9cf6 жыл бұрын
At the 400$ price range you can get the zhiyun crane plus now. Really great gimbal with some really advanced features, well worth the money
@justinperkins43535 жыл бұрын
You are absolutely right, however it takes a lot of time to balance and master the stabilizer... I spent hours trying to get it balanced and then using it properly was extremely hard. I finally gave up tossed it in the closet and purchased a gimbal .....
@IvoPavlik3 жыл бұрын
Very nice comparison! Is the shown footage stabilised in the post production or directly in the camera or is it the actual raw footage?
@123mbcline6 жыл бұрын
Very nicely done review, I hope to see more from you. keep up the nice work.
@EpicAdrian3D5 жыл бұрын
I'll be honest. I thought you were on a green screen the whole time:)
@rob93865 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@EricMyles6 жыл бұрын
Awesome video! to the average eye I dont think it'd be too clear which was which. I for one could tell from the first shot haha
@Spartan117A515 жыл бұрын
Could already tell A was mechanical. Lol but it's still super smooth
@SCREAMOguy4136 жыл бұрын
what lens was being used during the main shot of you talking?
@NigelBarros6 жыл бұрын
This whole video was filmed on the DJi 15mm f1.7
@thekp5036 жыл бұрын
Do you know how long this gimbal has been on the market? Not many reviews online and even less in the U.S. I would love a gimbal but can't afford the ronin s. I was looking at the fosicam fm1-45 last year but it was discontinued I hear. I'd hate to spend $400 and this thing explodes the next day and the company pulls up the tent stakes and leaves town the same day.
@SmokinMcPot4 жыл бұрын
nice video dude. thanks for the demo.
@edulens_6 жыл бұрын
how do you color grade?
@danfuerthgillis44833 жыл бұрын
One thing people don't understand about the older system of Steadicam is the operator has to take on 40 lbs on the body as the system is based on inertia so it requires a heavy setup in order to actually glide/ float through space. No gimbal in the world can match even a Steadicam from the 1980's. They 2 different tools that have nothing to do with each other. You can hybrid Steadicam and use Gimbals but this defeats the floating through space look of the Steadicam.
@geraldbertram77186 жыл бұрын
How much does the Hohem gimbal block the back of the screen?
@NigelBarros6 жыл бұрын
My Gh3 screen flips out so it doesn't block it at all, but with something like a sony it probably would block it a lot
@Veypurr14 жыл бұрын
A gimbal we eventually give you a problem in the field when you are really counting on it.
@pramesh406 жыл бұрын
Can u make the same video but then filming faster objects, like sport?
@mikenaughton42986 жыл бұрын
Nicely done. Great info. Thanks!
@DeeKaye4215 жыл бұрын
Sup Dude. Names Drew. I’m best buds with your brother Levi. Looking at cheap gimble reviews and found this one and recognized your sister. Small world haha anyway keep up the good work my friend!!
@serheyvasyuryna77086 жыл бұрын
I have same cheap stabilizer as your. Not bad for my first device. More better than handheld shooting, especially when you're shooting in 60 fps.
@Nearlyloved8654 жыл бұрын
I want that CISNO. Period.
@zazar22735 жыл бұрын
Whats the title of the song?
@JamesWickendenVideography6 жыл бұрын
Your must have had some practice with that stabiliser.... those shots were super smooth. Were they warp stabilised??? Awesome work man
@NigelBarros6 жыл бұрын
No warp, I’ve been shooting with the glide cam type device for a long time so I’ve had a lot of practice!
@topicruben6 жыл бұрын
😲 incredible!!! Thanks dude 👍👍👍
@churchsantana94624 жыл бұрын
Nigel, How long did you have to practice with the steadycam to get those tracking shots that smooth?
@BKrandy07 ай бұрын
I guessed wrong, lol. For me not having to deal with battery life is a big deal and why I will go with a stabilizer over an electronic gimbal
@sktx36286 жыл бұрын
One problem I have for the stabilizer is my camera being too light for it to be balanced
@mrparker-cro30496 жыл бұрын
Is the 40€ stabilizer compatibel with the panasonic g6 ?
@jenankaradsheh36275 жыл бұрын
what's your camera
@NigelBarros5 жыл бұрын
Panasonic Gh3 ✌🏼
@joshdiditt6 жыл бұрын
Use the $40 one with the GH5 IBIS and you're good to go.
@richaneesh6 жыл бұрын
Can you share link
@joshdiditt6 жыл бұрын
@@richaneesh it's in the description. Just press the arrow down. Or just type in Gimbals in Amazon.com and find a good one based off the reviews
@trickyricky986 жыл бұрын
BREADCRUMBS get a $40 glidecam and buy a $2,000 plus rig??
@joshdiditt6 жыл бұрын
@@trickyricky98 The GH5 is like 1,400 now. Good deals in eBay. Just make sure you look at the Sellers Feedback. Also check out the FlyCam review on Parker Walbeck channel
@mklokkert5 жыл бұрын
The moment you bring the stabilizer up the mountain the wind will not be a good friend though ;P